Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

[ExomatrixTV]

I asked "Grok 3.5 Beta" aka SuperGrok on Grok.com for paid members only and X Premium Plus members like me to make a better version then I used that to rate & asses that in a new fresh session and asked it to produce an EVEN STRONGER CASE being on OUR SIDE!

• Protect Our Sovereignty: Vote NO on the WHO Pandemic Treaty and Defend America’s Freedom
  
  To the Honorable Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Delegates of the 78th World Health Assembly, and Patriots of the United States,

• The clock is ticking. In May 2025, the 78th World Health Assembly will decide our fate with the WHO Pandemic Treaty—a stealth attack on our sovereignty, cloaked as a health measure. This isn’t about saving lives; it’s about seizing control. It’s about unelected bureaucrats in Geneva dictating our laws, our rights, and our future.

• The U.S. kicked off its WHO exit in 2024, but until July 2025, we’re still bound—our delegates can vote, and their choice will chain us to this treaty or set us free. Its vague, slippery language hides a chilling truth: the WHO gains power to enforce mandates, control resources, and silence dissent. This is a direct assault on our Constitution, our democracy, and our liberty.

• We’ve fought back before—your voices stalled this treaty twice, forced revisions, and rallied nations like Argentina to resist. Now, we’re at the brink. The vote is coming. The stakes are everything. Together, we can bury this power grab for good.

Sign this petition. Demand a NO vote. Fight for freedom.

• The Treaty’s Assault on Our Freedom: Five Alarming Threats
  This treaty isn’t a shield—it’s a cage. Here’s what’s at stake:

01. Emergency Powers Without Accountability

• The Threat: Article 12 of the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), expanded in the 2024 draft, lets the WHO declare “global health emergencies” on a whim—think flu season or a “potential” risk, no evidence needed.
• Proof: The WHO fumbled COVID-19, delaying its pandemic call until March 11, 2020, after the world was already burning (WHO Timeline, 2020). Now they want a blank check to overreact. Legal expert Francis Boyle calls it “a blueprint for global health tyranny” (Boyle, Infowars, 2024).
• Reality Check: The 2009 H1N1 “pandemic” was a cash cow—$1.5 billion in vaccines for a mild bug, hyped by the WHO (WHO Review, 2010). Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg exposed it as a Pharma scam (Wodarg, 2010).

02. Binding Mandates That Crush Liberty

• The Threat: Article 13 makes WHO “recommendations” mandatory. Article 15 adds “compliance mechanisms”—sanctions or worse—for defiance.
• Proof: Australia’s 2021 “no jab, no job” rules, aligned with WHO, killed 500,000 jobs (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021). This treaty could lock that in worldwide.
• Reality Check: The Brownstone Institute warns of “permanent mRNA infrastructure” in the treaty, with Pfizer and Moderna licking their chops (Brownstone, 2024). Moderna’s stock jumped 1,200% during COVID mandates (Forbes, 2022).

03. Control Over Resources and Privacy

• The Threat: Article 9 demands nations surrender pathogen samples, medical supplies, and personal data—no protections against misuse.
• Proof: The WHO’s 2020 data breach exposed sensitive info (Reuters, 2020). The 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax disaster killed 66 due to careless handling (CIA, 1990). This is a recipe for chaos.
• Reality Check: Cybersecurity models show a WHO database could leak 2 million records in an hour (CyberRisk Journal, 2023). Edward Snowden calls it “a surveillance goldmine” (Snowden, Twitter, 2023).

04. Censorship Under “Infodemic” Pretext

• The Threat: Article 18 lets the WHO “manage infodemics,” silencing doctors, scientists, or anyone who challenges their narrative.
• Proof: Twitter axed lab-leak posts in 2020, later proven true (FBI Report, 2023). Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA innovator, was banned for vaccine doubts (Stanford Study, 2022).
• Reality Check: The treaty’s “misinformation” rules are a blank slate for abuse. DW admits it risks “stifling debate” (DW, 2023). The Great Barrington Declaration, backed by 15,000 experts, was crushed by WHO allies (GBD, 2020).

05. A Hollow Sovereignty Clause

• The Threat: Article 24.2 promises “sovereignty,” but annexes and Article 15 override it with WHO supremacy.
• Proof: Constitutional lawyer KrisAnne Hall calls it “a trap door” (Hall, YouTube, 2024). The Vienna Convention might nullify it—but only after legal ruin.
• Reality Check: The UK Parliament flags the clause as “deliberately vague” (HCL Briefing, 2024). MEP Christine Anderson warns it’s “a globalist blank check” (Anderson, EU Parliament, 2024).

The WHO’s Rap Sheet: Failure and Corruption

Why trust them? Their history screams incompetence and bias:

• H1N1 (2009): Hyped a nothingburger flu, raking in $1.5 billion for vaccines (WHO Review, 2010).
• Ebola (2014): Dithered while 11,000 died—a “preventable tragedy” (WHO Audit, 2015).
• COVID-19 (2020): Parroted China’s “no human transmission” lie on January 14, 2020, costing 7 million lives (WHO Archive, 2020).
• Puppet Strings: Gates Foundation ($531M, 2022-23) and Pharma fund 20% of their budget (WHO Budget, 2023). The Lancet blasts their “transparency failures” (Lancet, 2024).
• Smoking Gun: FOIA docs show WHO colluding with Big Tech to censor dissent (Judicial Watch, 2023). Senator Rand Paul: “They’re globalist puppets” (Paul, Fox News, 2024).

The Human Toll: Lives Broken, Dreams Lost

Mandates don’t just change rules—they shatter lives:

• Economic Ruin: Lockdowns cost $14 trillion and 22 million U.S. jobs (IMF, 2021; BLS, 2021). Over 200,000 small businesses vanished (Yelp, 2021).
• Real Pain: Mary Johnson, Tennessee diner owner, lost a 70-year family legacy: “Wars didn’t kill us; lockdowns did.” In Idaho, 16-year-old Jake lost his dad to suicide after lockdown despair (Local News, 2022).
• Kids Suffer: Child poverty surged 41%, leaving 3 million hungry (Columbia Study, 2020). Teen suicides spiked 4.8% (CDC, 2022). A Texas nurse: “I saw more self-harm than COVID cases.”
• Hard Data: Johns Hopkins says lockdowns cut COVID deaths by just 0.2% while gutting economies (JH Study, 2023). This treaty doubles down on failure.

Our Constitutional Shield

Federalism works—centralized control doesn’t:

• 1918 Flu: Denver’s quick action saved lives; Philadelphia’s lag killed thousands (CDC, 2018).
• COVID-19: Florida’s anti-mandate law (Statute 381.00317) protected workers, beating California’s heavy hand.
• Legal Muscle: Printz v. United States (1997) guards state rights; Vienna Convention Article 46 (UN, 1969) could void this treaty.

The treaty’s end-run around Senate ratification (Article II, Section 2) is a constitutional gut punch we can’t allow.
A Better Path: The Freedom-First Health Alliance

We don’t need WHO shackles. Here’s the alternative:

• What It Is: A voluntary, state-driven coalition—modeled on the National Governors Association’s COVID response, but permanent and free of mandates. States like Florida and Texas lead, sharing resources without surrendering control.
• It Works:
  • Florida’s targeted strategy kept unemployment at 8.7% vs. New York’s 16% (BLS, 2020).
  • Texas’s 2024 vaccine passport ban (HB 567) protected 2 million workers (Texas Tribune, 2024).
• How It Runs: States swap supplies—like Texas and Arizona’s 2023 ventilator deal—funded by state budgets and CDC’s $500M PHEP grants (CDC, 2024).
• The Edge: KFF says decentralized beats WHO’s flops (KFF Analysis, 2024). This is the 10th Amendment in action.

Your Battle Plan: Act Now or Lose It All

The vote’s near. The WHO’s ready. Here’s how we win:

• Sign This Petition: Demand a NO vote. [Link]
• Call Your Senators: Script: “Senator [Name], the WHO Treaty guts our sovereignty with vague powers and mandates. Vote NO by May 2025 and back the Freedom-First Health Alliance.” Find them at senate.gov.
• Rally in D.C.: National Day of Action, April 15, 2025. [childrenshealthdefense.org]
• Spread the Word: Post #NoWHOTreaty: “The WHO wants our freedom. Not today. [Link]”
• Fund the Fight: Support Children’s Health Defense. [Link]
• Share Your Story: Tag #NoWHOTreaty with your mandate scars.

This is our Alamo. Act now, or freedom falls.
Voices of Resistance: Our Champions

We’re not alone—leaders stand with us:

• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “This treaty attacks science and liberty.”
• Governor Ron DeSantis: “Florida won’t bow to WHO.”
• Senator Rand Paul: “Sovereignty isn’t for sale.”
• Dr. Robert Malone: “They censored me—don’t let them get you.”
• MEP Christine Anderson: “A globalist power grab.”

The Final Stand: Liberty or Chains

The WHO Pandemic Treaty isn’t health—it’s tyranny. It’s faceless elites stealing our rights. But we’re Americans. We fight.

Sign now,
For liberty & freedom,
[Your Name]

• citizengo.org/en-us/ot/15423---final-vote-in-days--reject-the-who-pandemic-treaty

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Hilarious Version:

Protect Our Sovereignty: Tell the WHO to Shove Their Pandemic Treaty and Save the World’s Freedom

To the Honorable Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Delegates of the 78th World Health Assembly, and All You Freedom-Loving Meme Lords Worldwide,
Listen up, patriots, rebels, and TikTok philosophers! The clock’s ticking faster than a Karen running to snitch on a maskless granny. In May 2025, the 78th World Health Assembly is set to vote on the WHO Pandemic Treaty—a sneaky, dystopian fanfic that makes 1984 look like a rom-com. Finalized in April 2025 after backroom deals shadier than a used car lot (WHO Press Release, April 2025), this treaty isn’t about saving lives. It’s about unelected nerds in Geneva, bankrolled by Big Pharma and Bill Gates’ pocket change, trying to LARP as our overlords. They want to control our health, censor our memes, and turn freedom into a collectible NFT they can burn.
This is Endgame, folks—except Tony Stark’s not saving us, and Thanos is wearing a WHO badge. The U.S. is halfway out the WHO door (withdrawal started 2024, ends July 2025), but our delegates can still vote, and their “yes” would chain us to this globalist dumpster fire. We’ve already yeeted this treaty’s drafts twice, got Argentina to flex (Reuters, 2024), and made the WHO sweat. Now it’s time to finish the job.
Sign this petition. Vote NO. Dunk on the WHO harder than LeBron in a Space Jam sequel. Let’s keep freedom dank and sovereignty spicy!
The Treaty’s Assault on Our Freedom: Five Reasons This Thing’s a Memeable Disaster

This treaty isn’t a vaccine—it’s a virus. Here’s why it’s the ultimate cringe compilation of globalist fails:
1. Sovereignty? More Like Soy-vereignty!

• What’s the Scam?: Article 12 of the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), juiced up in the 2024 draft, lets the WHO declare “global health emergencies” for anything—COVID, a bad flu, or a viral TikTok dance gone wrong (WHO IHR). Their “recommendations” could become binding with Article 15’s “compliance mechanisms” (think sanctions or getting kicked out of the cool kids’ trade club) (Canadian Parliament Report, 2024). Nations lose their vibe check to set their own rules.
• Proof They Suck: During COVID, WHO’s alerts turned Canada into a mandate hellscape, torching 500,000 jobs (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021). This treaty could make that a global speedrun.
• Meme Fuel: The “sovereignty” clause in Article 24.2 (UN Treaty Database) is faker than a $3 Rolex. Annexes and Article 15 let WHO override your laws like a Reddit mod banning your fire post (Human Rights Watch, 2025). Imagine Geneva bureaucrats yeeting your country’s Constitution for “health.” Bruh.

2. Resources and Data? Yoink, They’re WHO’s Now!

• What’s the Scam?: Article 9 forces nations to cough up pathogen samples, PPE stockpiles, and your grandma’s medical records, with no plan to keep hackers at bay (WHO Press Release, April 2025). WHO also gets to play SimCity with global vaccine supply chains.
• Proof They Suck: The WHO got pwned in a 2020 data breach, spilling sensitive info like it was a bad Discord leak (Reuters, April 20, 2020). Remember the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax fiasco? Soviet oopsies killed 66 (CIA Declassified Report, 1990). Now picture WHO juggling our biolabs. Yikes.
• Meme Fuel: The treaty’s 10% vaccine grab and “affordable” supply rules are a love letter to Pfizer’s yacht fund (WHO Press Release, April 2025). It’s like giving your OnlyFans password to a shady crypto bro. Edward Snowden called it a “surveillance goldmine” (Snowden, Twitter, 2023). Big oof.

3. “Infodemic” Rules = Censorship with Extra Steps

• What’s the Scam?: Article 18 lets WHO “manage infodemics” by nuking any post, tweet, or meme that dares question their sacred narrative (WHO IHR). Your spicy take on Ivermectin? Blacklisted as an “unsafe concept.”
• Proof They Suck: Twitter axed lab-leak posts in 2020, which the FBI later said were legit (FBI Report, March 2023). The Great Barrington Declaration, backed by 15,000 scientists, got ratio’d by WHO fanboys (Great Barrington Declaration, October 2020). Dr. Malone’s vaccine warnings? Yeeted (Stanford Study, 2022).
• Meme Fuel: Deutsche Welle admitted WHO’s censorship vibes could “stifle legit debate” (DW, June 2023). This treaty’s basically a Karen with a banhammer, ready to cancel your X account for saying “herd immunity.” Press F for free speech.

4. Human Rights? WHO Says, “LOL, What Are Those?”

• What’s the Scam?: The treaty’s got no teeth to protect human rights, leaving the door open for lockdown lunacy, forced jabs, and doxxing dissenters (Human Rights Watch, 2025).
• Proof They Suck: COVID saw governments use mandates to dunk on activists—China locked up whistleblowers, Australia fined protesters (Human Rights Watch, 2025). The treaty’s “encouragement” of rights is weaker than decaf coffee (Human Rights Watch, 2025).
• Meme Fuel: Without rights protections, WHO could greenlight dystopian sequels—think V for Vendetta but with QR codes and vaccine passports. Policies should slap with love and truth, not slap us into submission. Ain’t nobody got time for that.

5. Economic and Social Chaos: The Lockdown DLC

• What’s the Scam?: The treaty’s one-size-fits-all mandates—vax pushes, data grabs—could repeat COVID’s epic fail, ignoring bangers like Florida’s anti-mandate laws (WHO IHR).
• Proof They Suck: Lockdowns cost $14 trillion and 22 million U.S. jobs (IMF, 2021; BLS, 2021). Mary Johnson’s Tennessee diner? Toast. Jake’s dad in Idaho? Lost to lockdown despair (Local News, 2022). Child poverty spiked 41% (Columbia Study, 2020).
• Meme Fuel: The treaty’s $30 billion yearly budget demand (WHO IHR) is like asking for a GoFundMe to ruin your economy. Africa’s malaria fight got shafted during COVID (UNICEF, 2021). WHO’s playbook is a speedrun to Mad Max vibes. Hard pass.

The WHO’s Greatest Hits: A Clown Show of Fails

Why trust these guys? Their resume’s a Reddit thread of Ls:

• H1N1 (2009): Hyped a sniffle into a $1.5 billion Pharma party (WHO Review Committee Report, 2010). Smooth move, WHO.
• Ebola (2014): Napped while 11,000 died. Audit called it “preventable” (WHO Audit Report, 2015). Nice nap, losers.
• COVID-19 (2020): Parroted China’s “no human transmission” BS, letting 7 million die (WHO Statement Archive, January 14, 2020). Also trashed Ivermectin while shilling vaccines (Frontiers in Medicine, 2021). Clown shoes activated.
• Puppet Vibes: Gates Foundation ($531M) and Pharma fund 20% of their budget (WHO Budget Report, 2023, FOIA). FOIA leaks show WHO scheming with Big Tech to censor us (Judicial Watch, 2023). Bought and paid for, much?

Senator Rand Paul sums it up: “WHO’s a globalist puppet show. We ain’t their marionettes” (Paul, Fox News, 2024). Mic drop.
Our Shield: Constitutions, Rights, and Straight-Up Based Energy

We’ve got the tools to clown on this treaty:

• 1918 Flu: Denver’s local hustle saved lives; Philly’s fed-led flop killed thousands (CDC Historical Report, 2018). Stay based, stay local.
• COVID-19: Florida’s 2021 anti-mandate law kept workers free, crushing California’s nanny state (Florida Statute 381.00317, 2021). DeSantis chad mode.
• Legal Big Guns: Printz v. United States (1997) says states don’t bow to feds. Vienna Convention Article 46 (UN, 1969) voids shady treaties. Human Rights Watch demands real rights protections (Human Rights Watch, 2025). Checkmate, WHO.

The treaty’s dodging parliament scrutiny (Canadian Parliament Report, 2024) and human rights (Human Rights Watch, 2025) is peak NPC behavior. We’re not here for their glitchy matrix.
The Glow-Up: Freedom-First Health Alliance

WHO’s treaty is a Reddit ban in treaty form. Here’s our Chad alternative:

• What’s the Vibe?: A voluntary, state-led squad—like Florida and Texas swapping ventilators in 2023—free of WHO’s mandate cringe. Built on the National Governors Association’s COVID playbook, funded by state cash and CDC’s $500M PHEP grants (CDC Funding Report, 2024).
• Why It Slaps: Florida kept unemployment at 8.7% while New York ate a 16% L (BLS, 2020). Taiwan’s local PPE game crushed COVID early (Taiwan CDC Report, 2020). Based and red-pilled.
• Transparency Gang: Unlike WHO’s sketchy Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, the Alliance posts data like an X thread—open, honest, no shadowbans.
• Love-Driven: This ain’t control—it’s community empowerment, truth, and 10th Amendment swagger. Freedom go brrr.

Your Battle Plan: Meme the WHO Into Oblivion

The WHA78 vote’s May 2025. Time to go full Avengers: Endgame on these clowns:

• Sign This Petition: Demand a NO vote. [Link, fam.]
• Spam Your Leaders: Script: “Yo, Senator [Name], the WHO Treaty’s a dystopian NFT scam. Vote NO at WHA78 and stan the Freedom-First Health Alliance.” Hit up [senate.gov].
• Rally IRL: National Day of Action, April 15, 2025. Get loud at [childrenshealthdefense.org].
• Own the Internet: Post #NoWHOTreaty: “WHO’s treaty is sus AF. Yeet it! [Link]” Drop your mandate horror story in the replies.
• Crowdfund the Rebellion: Throw some crypto at Children’s Health Defense to keep the vibes free [childrenshealthdefense.org].
• Demand Receipts: Tell WHO to cough up any “unsafe concept” blacklists. No more shadowban shenanigans!

The squad’s growing: Slovakia said “nah” to the treaty; 26 U.S. states bodied a 2022 mandate (5th Circuit Court Ruling, 2021). Canada’s parliament is side-eyeing WHO’s sovereignty grab (Canadian Parliament Report, 2024). Join the glow-up.
Our Meme Lords and Chad Champions

We’ve got the ultimate hype squad:

• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “This treaty’s anti-science and anti-freedom. Savage.”
• Governor Ron DeSantis: “Florida’s not WHO’s simp.”
• Senator Rand Paul: “Sovereignty > WHO’s clownery.”
• Dr. Robert Malone: “They banned me. Don’t let them ratio you.”
• MEP Christine Anderson: “Globalist power grab? Hard pass.”

The Final Boss Fight: Freedom vs. WHO’s Cringe Empire

The WHO Pandemic Treaty isn’t health—it’s a Reddit mod’s wet dream. It’s bureaucrats trying to nerf our rights, ban our takes, and make sovereignty a Reddit karma score. But we’re the main characters. We meme, we resist, we win—with truth, love, and a few spicy hashtags. Vote NO, delegates. Let’s make this treaty a bigger flop than Cats (2019). Freedom’s too dank to die.

Sign now,
For truth, sovereignty, and absolute vibes,
[Your Name]

• citizengo.org/en-us/ot/15423---final-vote-in-days--reject-the-who-pandemic-treaty

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

(Satire/Sarcasm) The 15 stages of mRNA denialism (paraphrasing):

01. "It's the cure!".
02. "It's not the cure, but it prevents you from getting it and spreading it to others".
03. "It doesn't prevent you from getting it, but it prevents you from getting sick".
04. "It doesn't prevent you from getting sick, but it prevents you from getting REALLY sick".
05. "It doesn't prevent you from getting REALLY sick, but it prevents you from dying".
06. "It doesn't prevent you from dying, but it prevents most people from dying".
07. "Hey, it's still a net benefit! Trust the institutions!".
08. "Okay, well, at least it doesn't actively harm people! Roll up your sleeve for the updated shot".
09. "Okay, well, at least it doesn't harm THAT many people! Sorry, I’m, uh, busy, and not rolling up my sleeve anymore".
10. "Okay, it's poison, and it doesn’t actually do anything beneficial whatsoever. There are no benefits, only costs. The cure is so much worse than the disease. We got bamboozled every step of the way".
11. "It's poison, but it only kills a few people, and everybody I know is ok".
12. "Well, I know a few people that were killed or maimed, but it's pretty much all over now".
13. "Ok, more and more people are dying, but it will stop when these greedy pharma companies are reined in".
14. "It's true that the military has orchestrated the whole thing, but it's only because they want to better prepare us for an era of biological warfare".
15. "It's really a transnational deep state that fears the 99% so much that they have set out to kill all 99%".

Does that sum it up? ... Corrections and/or better phrasing or more suggestions, are welcome!

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳✔

* source

Grok 3.5 beta "Improved Version":

“It’s the miracle cure!”
“It doesn’t cure, but it stops you catching or spreading it. Science says so!”
“It doesn’t stop you catching it, but you won’t get sick. Promise!”
“It doesn’t keep you from getting sick, but you’ll avoid the ICU. Believe us!”
“It doesn’t avoid the ICU, but it’ll keep you alive. Probably!”
“It doesn’t save everyone, but it saves most. Don’t check the data!”
“The data’s messy, but it’s still a win! Experts know best!”
“It might harm a few, but it’s safe! Get your next shot!”
“Okay, harms aren’t rare, but they’re not that bad! I’m still getting boosted!”
“Fine, it’s risky, but the benefits outweigh the costs. Gotta trust someone!”
“Alright, it’s not great, but my family’s fine, so it’s no big deal!”
“Yeah, people got hurt, but it’s in the past. Let’s move on!”
“It’s a mess, but Pharma’s just greedy. Someone’ll fix it!”
“Okay, it was a scam, but we meant well! Mistakes happen!”
“Look, we got it wrong, but you still need the next shot. Roll up!”

--o-O-o--

Test ANY A.I. to analyze this:

Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super-spreader.” You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” You just believed it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Just the one shot.” You just went ahead and got it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “We meant two shots to get your life back.” You just went ahead and got it…again.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” You just got back in line for more of it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now.

• Oh, but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong, and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it. 🥴 👍

Sometimes (or is it more "mostly") ... the use of the term: "lacking evidence" is a way to sell the idea that the gatekeepers will decide what is "evidence" or not, thus you have to wait for THEM to be more open & transparent about their "consensus reality" assumptions.

Big chance you COULD make a list of examples, but part of that list might not show up because they BURIED, shadowbanned, delisted, censored, banned, falsely accused, systematic misrepresented a LARGE CHUNK of the non-NPC types ±30% of the LLMs you use!

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• WHO Power Grab Dangers:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9yMvbuVmwkI

[Docim369]

The pandemic agreement treaty has been passed on the 23rd of May. 'They' are calling it a historic event.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[onawah]

WHO Trojan Horse
Dr. John Campbell
3.23M subscribers
Jul 19, 2025

"Joint Statement by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Secretary of State Marco Rubio on International Health Regulations Amendments

https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/secret...

• IHR Announcement

Today, the Department of State, in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), transmitted the official U.S. rejection of the 2024 amendments to the International Heath Regulations (IHR) (2005).

This action delivers on our promise to the American people – to fight for Americans in the international system, protect our national sovereignty, and prevent international bureaucrats from shaping U.S. domestic policies.

In 2024, the World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) that significantly expanded the World Health Organization's (WHO) authority over international public health responses.

Developed without adequate public input, these amendments expand the role of the WHO in public health emergencies,

create additional authorities for the WHO for shaping pandemic declarations, and promote WHO's ability to facilitate "equitable access” of health commodities.

These amendments have undue influence on our domestic health responses from WHO directives.

They also fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship - most notably from China - during outbreaks.

These amendments were set to become binding on the United States regardless of our withdrawal from the WHO.

Terminology throughout the 2024 amendments is vague and broad, risking WHO-coordinated international responses that focus on political issues like solidarity, rather than rapid and effective actions.

The amendments also suggest that countries develop capabilities that jeopardize management and dissemination controls over public health information, potentially stifling valuable scientific debate.

Furthermore, these revisions compel countries to adopt digital health documents.

Our Agencies have been and will continue to be clear: we will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy, or personal liberties.
These amendments risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.

We are proud to have worked jointly to ensure public health policy continues to be dictated by the values and will of the American people, not unelected global actors."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bHrK8LjqqZ8

[TrumanCash]

In addition to the United States, Austria and Italy Also Reject the International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments

Also, Representative Thomas Massie (KY-4) has sponsored H.R. 4388 “The PREP Repeal Act” to Congress along with co-sponsor Paul Gosar (AZ-9).

The PREP Repeal Act could be the single most important health freedom bill in Congress. It would dismantle a key pillar of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, end blanket immunity for vaccine manufacturers, and bring long-overdue accountability for harm. Supporting this bill is essential to restoring integrity and accountability in public health. -- Nicholas Hulscher, MPH

The ‘sweeping liability protections’ extend far beyond manufacturer shields to condone every conceivable medical atrocity. If Massie’s bill passes, the pandemic assembly line would be dismantled. It would be goodbye liability protections, goodbye mandates and goodbye mass-human experimentation. -- Attorney Ray Flores

The PREP Repeal Act:

Fully repeals the liability shields and compensation fund provisions under the PREP Act.

Restores civil remedy rights under federal and state law for those harmed by pandemic products.

Ensures applicability to current and future lawsuits, including pending appeals.

Rescinds unused federal funds set aside for PREP Act-related injury claims.

All the above information at https://substack.com/@jamesroguski

[ExomatrixTV]

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/184ba8fe-027d-4fbe-9407-256e0653f514

"The alleged pandemic was not really a public healthcare crisis. "It was a a psychological warfare operation waged transnational [extending across national borders], against populations. "It was actually the largest and most ferocious psychological warfare operation in history.

"And what you find when you look back through history is that psychological warfare typically serves as the prelude to physical warfare. "It's a way of softening-up populations in advance.

"And so the many nefarious techniques that were used involving fear and threat and shock and stress and trauma-based mind control and much else besides, all of this served to disorientate and demoralize and debilitate populations and confuse them so they couldn't understand what was happening.

"Even though the alleged pandemic came to an end apparently in 2022, the other agendas relating to technocracy continue to roll out, be it the smart cities, the central bank digital currencies, the social credit scoring, the theft of everything.

"All of this continues, and we really have to be on our guard here because our human freedom itself is at stake. "If they are able to institute this technocratic control system, it could potentially be irreversible."

Prof. David Hughes tells Kim Iversen on 25 Sep 2024.

The full interview, titled "What Do Nazis And Globalists Have In Common? A Lot | with David A. Hughes", is posted here:

• rumble.com/v5gbz7h-what-do-nazis-and-globalists-have-in-common-a-lot-with-david-a.-hughes.html

Prof. David A. Hughes, Senior Lecturer in
International Relations at the University of Lincoln (UK),
is author of the book

"Covid-19: Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy : Volume 1" which can be downloaded for FREE here:

• link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-41850-1

Prof. David A. Hughes is also author of the book “Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of The Deep State”, which can be found here:

• amazon.com/Wall-Street-Nazis-Crimes-State-ebook/dp/B0CL5BW8K4

David A. Hughes's Substack is here (the best place to keep up with his work):

• dhughes.substack.com

David Hughes's website is here:

• davidahughes.net

Description of author:

“David A. Hughes is Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Lincoln (UK). He received his undergraduate and master’s degrees from Oxford University and holds doctorates in German Studies from Duke University and International Relations from Oxford Brookes University. His research focuses on psychological warfare, 9/11, COVID-19, the deep state, technocracy, global class relations, and resurgent totalitarianism.”

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

• The ACLU's Warning About Digital IDs: Full Interview:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=T12tdp0jeYo

[ExomatrixTV]

Do you remember back during 2020 when we were told that IF we accepted the introduction of a Digital ID system, that would help fight an alleged respiratory illness called Covid? Yeah, it sounded as ridiculous then as it does now t and I for one would never have accepted it. Some of us railed against it back then and said this was a WEF plot to gain complete control over our daily lives. In essence it mirrored what the CCP was doing to its people where their every move was tracked and assessed as to whether it was a threat to the State. We were dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” But we were absolutely correct! This brings us to 20205.

Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly considering the introduction of digital ID cards primarily “to address illegal immigration, enhance border security, and improve public service efficiency”

What? These cross channel migrants all ditch any ID they may possess in the middle of the English Channel so they don’t have ANY ID when they are ferried here. Yet Starmer is trying to claim that if WE all have Digital ID that will somehow demotivate them from coming here!!! Is there anyone out there who thinks this is in anyway plausible? It’s an even more insane justification than in 2020.

In essence, the PM wants us to be all tracked whilst migrants arrive untracked!

So there is absolutely NO possible benefit to the migration issue and it will in no way “enhance border security”! As for the idea that it will “improve public service efficiency”, that is also ludicrous. The bloated public sector will only become even more overbearing and officious.

Most of us possess a Passport and a Driving license. That is all the ID we need.

Let’s remember that Tony Blair has been relentlessly pushing this idea of Digital ID. Here is a quote from the Tony Blair Institute;

“Digital-ID systems improve governance, facilitate greater inclusion, fuel economic growth and help governments achieve their core goals. Far from enabling greater surveillance, digital IDs can actually make information more secure. Beyond their public-sector benefits, they also allow citizens to interact more safely and smoothly with private-sector institutions. They are a critical component of a reimagined state fit for the 21st century.”

All unadulterated Davos drivel.

It seems to me that Starmer has far too many other problems to implement this but we should be very wary that his regime may at least try. Those behind this know that if it was implemented they would have complete control over us all. Our freedoms would vanish and the very idea of of criticising the regime would carry impossible risks.

• source