The Magenta Protocol - Why the First Known “Crash” May Have Been No Accident

[CaptnNemo]

Posted by peace (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=n4xngKLVCPQ

i'm not saying its a time travel device.


yes. yes, i am.

Again...A whole lot of nothing as usual. People that claim they know stuff but can't talk about it. I'm kind of fed up with these individuals. You either tell what you know or just stfu! loll

I've been seeing these kinds of "Non revelations" for decades now....Yeah I'm 50 years old...and still we know jack squat!

I'm at a point of just letting stuff happen and will deal with it when it does if it does.

Let's just enjoy every day's life as it goes and be happy in the present moment!

Sorry about the mini rant!

P.s. Nothing against you Peace!

[peace]

SOOOOOOO much of that, and i get it!

very frustrating. I trust the astronomer here, i think with time something will come of this.

(probably not a time travel device - but SOMEthing).

[peace]

HEY!!

Not a long wait:

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...al_Observatory

Abstract
Old, digitized astronomical images taken before the human spacefaring age offer a rare glimpse of the sky before the era of artificial satellites. In this paper, we present the first optical searches for artificial objects with high specular reflections near the Earth. We follow the method proposed in Villarroel et al. (2022) and use a transient sample drawn from (Solano et al. 2022). We use images from the First Palomar Sky Survey to search for multiple (within a plate exposure) transients that, in addition to being point-like, are aligned along a narrow band. We provide a shortlist of the most promising candidates, including one with ∼3.9σ statistical significance. As in previous cases (Villarroel et al. 2021, Solano et al. 2023), no known astrophysical or instrumental explanations fully account for these events. We explore remaining possibilities, including fast reflections from highly reflective objects in geosynchronous orbit, or emissions from artificial sources high above Earth's atmosphere. Notably, the ∼3.9σ candidate coincides in time with the Washington D.C. 1952 UFO flyover, and another (a ∼2.0
σ candidate) falls within a day of the peak of the 1954 UFO wave (Figuet 1980). We also find a highly significant (∼22σ) deficit of transients from Solano et al. 2022 within Earth's shadow, supporting the interpretation that sunlight reflection plays a key role in producing these events. This study should be viewed as an initial exploration into the potential of archival photographic surveys to reveal transient phenomena, and we hope it motivates more systematic searches across historical datasets.

THIS is why i was hyped: Villarroel is the real deal!

Conclusions: 11. CONCLUSIONS:
This paper presents a first systematic search for multiple, simultaneously appearing and vanishing optical point588sources on long-exposure photographic plates that also exhibit spatial alignment. We focus on the red POSS-I plates,589and present five top candidate events with three or more transients aligned along a narrow band. The most statistically590significant case (Candidate 5) coincides in time with the well-documented Washington D.C. 1952 UFO flap—one of591the most prominent mass sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) in recorded history. A separate study592(Bruehl & Villarroel 2025) confirms a statistically significant (>3) temporal correlation between VASCO transients593and independent historical UAP reports.594The origin of the transients remains unknown. One plausible explanation is that they are caused by brief light595emissions from artificial objects in orbit or by objects with anomalous movements in Earth’s atmosphere—emissions596so brief that they appear as point sources rather than streaks, despite the telescope tracking the stars. Alternatively,597they could arise from solar reflections o↵flat, highly reflective surfaces at geosynchronous altitudes. The latter598interpretation is further supported by our shadow test in Section 8, which reveals a significant deficit of such events599within the Earth’s umbra, consistent with a solar reflection origin and difficult to reconcile with many explanations,600including photographic plate defects.601Our results motivate continued investigation of historical sky surveys and the application of similar alignment-based602detection methods to modern deep-sky imaging. Whether or not these events ultimately point to the existence of603NTAs, the identification of statistically improbable, spatially aligned transients in pre-satellite data represents a novel604observational anomaly deserving of further scientific attention. Future work may help clarify whether these transients605constitute a new class of astronomical phenomena—or represent the first hints of artificial activity near our planet.606


TL:DR: evidence of something(s) orbiting/transiting our planet well before manmade objects were up

[peace]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uGSLeyt9YBI

a little easier to digest