Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

[ExomatrixTV]

• Exiled Brain Surgeon: DARPA Mind Control, Quantum Biology & Sunlight Medicine | Dr. Jack Kruse

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SiBFtwbyv44

Dr. Jack Kruse is a neurosurgeon who focuses on the study of physics, light, magnetism, and electricity. He ultimately concluded that modern medicine lacked a deep understanding of how humans function in relation to the natural world.

[ExomatrixTV]

Top US Neuroscientist & Military Advisor Confirms Reports Are ‘Credible’ That Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Have Happened on US Soil And Targeted US Personnel Abroad; Exclusive New Records Reveal Exposure to “Microwave Weapon” After Intel Officer Discovered Secret Op. “These are weapons of maximum disruption…It allows you to get in fast, hit hard, get out, and only then will the effects begin to be known.”

• 01:50 Reports of DEW Attacks on US Soil Are Credible
• 02:50 Different Types of DEWs: Sonic & Scalable, Directable Microwaves
• 03:30 Retired Counterintelligence Officer Mike Beck Now In Assisted Living Following DEW Attack
• 04:50 DEW Attack Happened After Beck And His Partner Discovered Operation Targeting USA By Hostile Country
• 06:40 How DEW Attacks Disrupt & Destroy Brain Networks
• 07:30 DEW Attack Aftermath: Brain Cell Death & The Domino Effect
• 08:20 Big Three: USA, Russia & China Have DEW Capability
• 09:05 Why Beck’s Case Stands Out And The Legacy of Suffering
• 10:20 CIA Whistleblower ‘Alice’ Targeted by DEW in Africa
• 11:00 Exclusive New Medical Records Document Beck’s Microwave Weapon Brain Injury
• 11:55 US Government Denied Beck Workers’ Compensation Multiple Times Before Approving It
• 12:10 US Government Currently Three Months Behind ($25,000+) On Payments for Beck’s Assisted Living
• 13:00 Beck: US Government Has Critical Evidence About Attacks & Weapons
• 14:20 Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Started in 2016: False
• 14:50 Trump Administration Openly Addresses Havana Syndrome: Secretary Rubio
• 15:50 Beck’s Request for President Trump

source

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Case Against 5G "Safety" Claims!

[ExomatrixTV]

• W.H.O. Finds Mobile Phone and Wi-Fi Radiation Causes Cancer

by Gillian Jamieson
5 May 2025



In what appears to be an astonishing volte-face, a WHO systematic review has found reliable evidence that radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) increase the risk of cancer in animal experiments. The WHO has a long history of downplaying the health risks of RF-EMFs from smart devices, WiFi and mobile communications base stations. Indeed, up until two weeks ago, when a correction to a different WHO review forced an admission that RF-EMFs do after all have a negative impact on male fertility, this history seemed to be repeating itself.

The WHO EMF Project had commissioned 12 separate reviews to assess existing studies on the health effects of EMFs and indeed, many of these were true to form, finding little harm from wireless radiation. Take, for example, the systematic review on ‘The Effect of Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields on Cancer Risk in the General and Working Population’, by Karipidis et al. (2024). This concluded that exposure to mobile phones or phone masts is unlikely to cause brain cancer or childhood cancer and that occupational exposure may not cause brain cancer, with one of the authors, Ken Karipidis, being quoted in the Guardian as saying, “concerns around links between cancer and mobile phones should be put to rest”.

However, in a complete turnaround, this latest review, ‘Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Cancer in Laboratory Animal Studies’ (Mevissen et al.), published on April 25th, concludes that there is “evidence that RF-EMF exposure increases the incidence of cancer in experimental animals with the [certainty of evidence] being strongest for malignant heart schwannomas and gliomas” (brain tumours). The review also found moderate certainty of evidence of an increased risk of rare tumours in the adrenal glands and in the liver. Although the study states that extrapolating the level of human risk of cancer from animal studies can be complex, the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) has said in its press release: “Notably, the same types of tumours have also been observed in human studies, adding significant confidence that the associations observed in human studies are real.” (The ICBE-EMF is an independent “ international consortium of scientists, doctors and researchers with expertise and peer-reviewed publications on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields including wireless RF radiation.” ]

Why is it a surprise that a WHO-funded review is now admitting that RF-EMF exposure increases the risk of cancer? Put bluntly, the WHO has always appeared to be on the side of the telecoms industry, rather than on the side of public health. Oncologist and epidemiologist Professor Lennart Hardell in his comprehensive 2017 article, (which I highly recommend) alleged that the WHO EMF Project was compromised, since it began as a close collaboration between the WHO, the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the electric, telecoms and military industries. The project was partly financed by the industry lobbying organisations, GSM Association and Mobile Manufacturers Forum. Its current leader, van Deventer, is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, which has long prioritised international lobbying efforts aimed at the WHO. Hardell also mentions the sharing of personnel between the WHO EMF Project and ICNIRP, whose safety exposure guidelines are followed by the UK.

Industry funding and conflicts of interest are likely to lead to flawed science. Six of the WHO reviews have already been severely criticised, with requests for retraction and another three have had to be corrected, in one case leading to an opposite conclusion to the original. Dr Joel Moskovitz of the University of California, Berkeley listed these issues in his webpage news (scroll down to his entry for 24th April).

The earlier review on the effects of RF-EMFs on humans, with regard to cancer (Karipidis et al. 2024), is one of those that has attracted criticism. The ICBE-EMF, in a letter to the article’s editor, stated that there were critical methodological flaws leading to an understatement of the potential for causation of cancer by RF-EMFs. In addition, another recent meta-analysis by Moon et al. (2024), which used almost the same studies as Karipidis et al. found that higher cumulative call-time is associated with a statistically significantly higher relative risk of brain tumours in humans. Furthermore, another six recent meta-analyses showed similar results, confirming a close association between phone use and cancer. ICBE-EMF has produced an excellent fact sheet to illuminate the scientific flaws of the Karipidis et al. review and listing the other meta-analyses.

Riddled by conflicts of interest as the WHO project is (Hardell, 2017), the conclusion of its latest review (Mevissen et al. 2025) admitting cancer risks in animals is indeed highly significant. Public health bodies throughout the world rely on WHO guidance, which, even now, states that, “no adverse health effect has been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies”. In the UK, our Government seems to be fully reliant on the WHO. COMARE, a Department of Health and Social Care expert committee, whose remit is to report on the health effects of RF-EMFs to Government, has never been asked to do so and indeed does not have the expertise. It has admitted that it is awaiting the results of the WHO reviews, as mentioned in my written evidence to the ‘Broadband and Road to 5G Inquiry’. The last review undertaken by the UK itself was in 2012 by the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation (AGNIR), a report which was discredited by Dr Starkey as it omitted and distorted scientific evidence, leading to wrong and misleading conclusions.

In its press release on 27th April 2025, the ICBE-EMF states about this latest review:

Given this high level of certainty, government policymakers worldwide should immediately move to revise their RF radiation exposure limits to protect public health and the environment. … Current exposure standards, based on outdated assumptions, do not reflect the scientific evidence linking RF radiation to cancer and other health effects. …The conclusion of the study commissioned by the WHO shows that the long-standing assumption current government limits are based on — that cell phone RF radiation can only cause harm through tissue heating — is wrong.

With chronic disease and electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) on the rise, surely it is time for the UK to stop relying on ICNIRP, to take on board the immense significance of the WHO producing a review admitting the harmful effects of EMFs and to adopt more protective guidelines. RF-EMFs are present in ever-increasing areas of our lives and the ability to reduce our own exposure, if we wish, is simply disappearing day by day.

Despite the classification in 2011 by the WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of RF-EMFs as a Class 2B carcinogen and thousands of studies showing harm to health below the tissue heating threshold (ICNIRP’s main measure of harm), and despite the chance to update the safety exposure limits in 2020, these limits have remained unchanged since 1998. Long-term effects such as cancer and effects below the heating threshold were simply ignored.

This recent review giving reliable evidence that RF-EMFs increase the risk of cancer, along with the corrected review admitting that RE-EMFs have a negative impact on male sterility, therefore represent a huge change of emphasis. But what action will be taken by Government?

Put simply, and considering that the tumours described have also been found in human studies, anyone using a smartphone or other smart device, or who is near WiFi, near a smart meter, in a modern car, in a train or near a phone mast, is exposing themselves to the risk of cancer in the long-term. There are of course risks of other disease, but that is not the subject of this article.

Even those, such as electromagnetic hypersensitivity sufferers, who need to protect themselves from EMFs by not going out, by wearing shielding clothing and using only ethernet-wired computers, will soon find themselves being assaulted in their own homes by the need to have a smart meter, or even worse, will find that when their copper landline is finally discontinued, their BT Smart Hub 2, necessary for VOIP, has a DECT phone signal, which cannot be switched off, though the Wi-Fi can be disabled. BT confirmed as much to an EMF surveyor friend of mine during an online chat. And what about those living in flats, being irradiated by their neighbours’ WiFi, or even a nearby phone mast? We are reaching a stage where there is no longer any choice.

This recent review should be a wake-up call for everyone, not just those who suspected as much all along. Although most people cannot imagine life without a smartphone, much can be done through engineering solutions and by using wired internet connections in homes, schools and workplaces, as well as various personal measures, such as not carrying your smartphone next to your body or using a Faraday bag. But first of all, people have to know about the harms of EMFs. Who will tell them?

• source
• tinyurl.com/Bogus5GSafetyClaims

[ExomatrixTV]

source

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Catherine Herridge INTERVIEW: Feds KNOW MORE About Havana Syndrome 'ENERGY WEAPONS'!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bfk_V0XhWIY

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Ruling In Case Against 5G Rollout Postponed Until July 2, 2025 Mass Claim In The Making:

The verdict in the lawsuit against Odido in connection with the halting of the rollout of the 5G network has been postponed for six weeks until July 2. The good news is that the multi-member chamber takes this legal case very seriously and has now twice needed six weeks more time to deliver a verdict on this important legal case, says Jordy Zwarts of the National Association against Government Affairs, which brought the case. The court therefore needs 12 more weeks to pronounce a verdict, according to the Association. “To be clear: there are three judges involved in this case. The judges have been checkmated, with a very special demand that cannot in fact be rejected.”

• Extreme dangers

The WHO has acknowledged a "highly likely" link between mobile phone use and the development of malignant brain and heart tumors following a new study into the effects of radiation on cancer. This marks a remarkable U-turn for the WHO. In addition, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. previously revealed that he had won a major lawsuit against the US telecom authority FCC, which he accused of lying about cell phone radiation. During a meeting broadcast by NewsNation, Kennedy said that radio frequency radiation from 5G is very dangerous. “There are tens of thousands of studies showing the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation,” Kennedy said.

• Mass Damages Claim

With these developments and the upcoming verdict of July 2, 2025 the Association will file a mass damage claim together with the foundation Act 4 Claim, demanding the termination of the 5G network due to the great dangers and the involuntary involvement in an experiment. A compensation of 2000 euros per day is claimed for all participants in this collective legal action.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
• fb.com/groups/Stop5G
• Stop5GUK Fb Group

[ExomatrixTV]

An official website of the United States government

NLM database & National Institutes of Health.


Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Nov 29;15:439. doi: 10.25259/SNI_731_2024

Microwave Radio Ffrequencies, 5G, 6G, Ggraphene Nanomaterials: Technologies used in Neurological Warfare

Fabien Deruelle 1,*

PMCID: PMC11618680 PMID: 39640342

Abstract

Background:

Scientific literature, with no conflicts of interest, shows that even below the limits defined by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, microwaves from telecommunication technologies cause numerous health effects: neurological, oxidative stress, carcinogenicity, deoxyribonucleic acid and immune system damage, electro-hypersensitivity. The majority of these biological effects of non-thermal microwave radiation have been known since the 1970s.

• Methods:

Detailed scientific, political, and military documents were analyzed. Most of the scientific literature comes from PubMed. The other articles (except for a few) come from impacted journals . The rare scientific documents that were not peer reviewed were produced by recognized scientists in their fields. The rest of the documentation comes from official sources: political (e.g., European Union and World Health Organization), military (e.g., US Air Force and NATO), patents, and national newspapers.

• Results:

(1) Since their emergence, the authorities have deployed and encouraged the use of wireless technologies (2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi, WiMAX, DECT, Bluetooth, cell phone towers/masts/base stations, small cells, etc.) in full awareness of their harmful effects on health. (2) Consequences of microwave radiation from communication networks are comparable to the effects of low-power directed-energy microwave weapons, whose objectives include behavioral modification through neurological (brain) targeting. Above 20 gigahertz, 5G behaves like an unconventional chemical weapon. (3) Biomedical engineering (via graphene-based nanomaterials) will enable brain-computer connections, linked wirelessly to the Internet of Everything through 5G and 6G networks (2030) and artificial intelligence, gradually leading to human-machine fusion (cyborg) before the 2050s.

• Conclusion:

Despite reports and statements from the authorities presenting the constant deployment of new wireless communication technologies, as well as medical research into nanomaterials, as society’s ideal future, in-depth research into these scientific fields shows, above all, an objective linked to the current cognitive war. It could be hypothesized that, in the future, this aim will correspond to the control of humanity by machines.

Keywords: Cognitive warfare, COVID-19 vaccines, Directed energy weapons, Electro-hypersensitivity, Internet of Everything, Neurodegenerative diseases

• INTRODUCTION

Unlike natural cosmic microwaves, microwaves from wireless communication technologies are polarized (electronic oscillations take place in specific directions/orientations), which can lead to irregular triggering of electrosensitive ion channels on cell membranes and cause numerous biological effects, up to and including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, cell death, or cancer;[113,114] modulated (used to encode information) and pulsed, at very low frequencies (close to brain waves).[106,115]

By the 1970s, the biological effects of microwaves (neurologic, endocrine gland activity, cardiovascular, hemodynamic, metabolic, gastric, ocular, testicles, bone marrow, hypertension, abortion, and behavioral), with exposures below intensities that cause heating, were already known,[14,27,106], especially from the military, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and World Health Organization (WHO).[1,79,117] The guidelines and standards selected by the WHO, through the International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), have therefore been deliberately chosen with full knowledge of the facts since the beginning of wireless technology deployment.

The standards defined by the ICNIRP serve as the basis for most recommendations and regulations in countries around the world. In 2020, ICNIRP guidelines, for all frequencies between 2 and 300 gigahertz (GHz), allow a 30-min average whole-body exposure of 10, 000, 000 µW/m2 (10 W/m2 or 1000 µW/cm2).[106] With regard to 5G technology, which uses frequencies above 6 GHz, and whose specificity is to send directional beams localized on the user [Figure 1], the ICNIRP authorizes a local exposure of 200,000,000 µW/m2 (200 W/m2) for 6 min over an area of 4 cm2, and 400,000,000 µW/m2 over an area of 1 cm2, for frequencies >30 GHz.[106] However, according to experts with no conflicts of interest, the maximum intensity should not exceed 10 µW/m2.[106]

Figure 1:



In contrast to previous generations of networks, 5G uses beam steering, allowing base station antennas to direct the radio signal toward users and devices rather than in all directions (Source: “The Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) Explained Series - emfexplained.info”).

By comparison, for the whole frequency spectrum from 2G to 5G, the ICNIRP exposure limit recommendation for man-made electromagnetic radiation is ~1021–1023-fold higher than the average radiation background of the Sun’s nonionizing radiation at Earth’s surface in the 2G–5G spectral range (~10−23–10−21 mW/cm2).[55]

The massive rollout of 5G and 5G in the millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency band (30–300 GHz) is scandalizing many scientists with no conflicts of interest. Indeed, since the start of wireless communication technologies using microwave frequency bands (0.3–300 GHz), the authorities in charge of health assessments have constantly covered up the truth about the dangerousness of these devices (2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi, WiMAX, DECT, Bluetooth, cell phone towers/masts/base stations, small cells, etc.).[52,70,106,107]


Below ICNIRP limits (non-thermal effects), microwave studies have shown brain tumors, neurological effects, increased oxidative stress, cancers, mutagenic effects due to DNA damage, neuropsychiatric disorders (behavioral changes), electro-hypersensitivity (EHS), increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, inflammatory factors, increased male and female infertility, cellular stress response, immune suppression, and disturbance of energy metabolism.[12,15,16,18,19,74,78,70,112,115,116,136] Note that oxidative stress is associated with various chronic diseases and cancer and leads to aging.[63] As a result, constant exposure to electromagnetic radiation from wireless technologies accelerates aging.

Neuropsychiatric effects caused by non-thermal microwave radiofrequencies (RFs) have been widely documented: sleep disturbance, headache, depressive symptoms, fatigue, concentration dysfunction, memory changes, dizziness, irritability, electroencephalogram changes, etc.[111,112] These behavioral problems can extend to suicidal thoughts in children and adolescents.[65,109]

EHS was first described as microwave syndrome or microwave illness: behavioral and nervous system effects, fatigue, pain, depression, fainting, sleep disorders, etc.[27] Then, it was refined and completed by headache, tinnitus, hyperacusis, superficial and/or deep sensibility abnormalities, fibromyalgia, vegetative nerve dysfunction and reduced cognitive capability, transient cardiovascular dysfunction, and loss of appetite.[16,17]
Superimposing 5G radiation on an already toxic wireless radiation environment will exacerbate adverse health effects. The 5G mmWaves network will affect not only the skin and eyes but also the heart, liver, kidney, spleen tissue, blood, and bone marrow.[74] In mice, exposure to 5G at 4.9 GHz induces depressive-like behavior, which may be associated with neuronal pyroptosis in the amygdala.[120] 5G at 3.5 GHz can also rapidly cause microwave syndrome.[108] The interaction of mmWaves with the structure and function of pertinent cellular elements and cutaneous neuroreceptors in the skin are of special concern. There are not enough studies on 5G mmWaves to reach a confident judgment.[97]

Despite the many warnings sent to the European Union (EU) and WHO over several years by hundreds of scientists and publications, health authorities continue to ignore the biological effects of non-thermal microwave radiation,[52,106,107] leading to criminal attitude from the EU.[107] Although children are more vulnerable than adults to radiation from wireless technologies,[16] ICNIRP considers that the limit values it proposes provide greater protection for children, stipulating that they would be better thermoregulated than adults.[69]

Fauna and flora are also constantly under assault from wireless communication technologies [85,86] without any environmental standards being set.[87]
Thus, the protective limits given by ICNIRP in 2020 protect neither health nor the environment from RF microwaves, including 5G.[70,74,106]

In 2020, two Members (Buncher and Rivasi) of the European Parliament commissioned, coordinated, and published a report on the ICNIRP showing that this scientific organization is « captured by industry » and is therefore unable to provide a reliable assessment of current scientific knowledge.[129] It should be noted that Italy has a 10-time lower exposure limit with no detrimental effects for industry.[106] «The media, WHO, and the governments are not transmitting information to the population, who remain uninformed.»[12]

Consequently, the harmfulness of guidelines is intentional, and biological effects are not collateral damage. This study aims to show the real objectives of wireless communication technologies, disguised as scientific progress, and the methods (e.g., combined with nanomaterials) used to achieve them. The neurological system, mainly the human brain, is targeted.

• INTENTIONAL IRRADIATION OF THE POPULATION
• (Ever increasing "Erratic Pulsed Microwaves & mmWaves" Saturation Blanket all over the place with no public debate!)

WHO, EU, Pharmaceutical Industry

Pharmaceutical companies are well known for their scientific misconduct, their conflicts of interest and their links with the WHO and EU, which induce political lies, as well as their links with the military.[37] It would seem that the same behavior applies to the telecommunications industry.[56,129] In 2019, a document from the French Ministry of Economy and Finance recommended, for health purposes, increasing the participation of pharmaceutical companies in the international race to use electromagnetic and acoustic non-ionizing waves.[41] This raises the possibility of direct conflicts of interest between the pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries.

Given the large number of known pathologies triggered by the non-thermal microwave RFs, as well as the conflicts of interest between pharmaceutical companies and the telecommunications industry with the WHO and EU, we wonder whether: Would not microwaves and wireless devices also serve to increase the number of pathologies (mainly neurodegenerative) to justify research into body-implantable medical nanotechnology (see later section on graphene)?

Microwave interactions with Atmospheric Particles

The vast majority of laboratory experiments do not take into account the synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli (e.g., chemical and biological) acting in conjunction with wireless radiation.[74]

As microwave RFs induces BBB permeability, this inevitably leads to increased absorption of micro- and nanoparticles (e.g., aluminum), which can be found in growing quantities in the atmosphere, raising the number of cases of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.[36] Moreover, electromagnetic radiation modifies the physical properties of atmospheric microparticles. The number of particles increases, and their morphologies, movements, and trajectories are altered.[64] These additional parameters need to be taken into account for public health.

• Army in background

In Australia, government advisory agencies must support government plans for an Internet of Things (IoT) and smart cities (dependent on wireless technologies) to the detriment of people’s health. In addition, changes to RF standards to protect health and the environment are not permitted if they are prejudicial to departments of defense or national security.[132]

At the beginning of the 1976 US military report, it is written that if microwave radiation exposure standards in the most advanced Western countries are as strict as in the (at the time) Communist countries, there could be adverse effects on industrial production and military functions.[1]

The military role is preponderant in understanding the deployment of wireless technologies, mainly 5G, and the authorized standards. For more than half a century, the US military has been seeking to master mind control using various technologies, including electromagnetic waves.[35] Connecting the human brain to the machine has been one of the most important military objectives (through DARPA) for decades (p. 20-32).[58]

Given that DNA damage is a known side-effect of microwave RFs,[115] we might also wonder whether one of the aims of this intentional microwave irradiation, at these levels of power density, would be to create a form of genetic mutation conducive to the future human-machine fusion (see last part of the article).

• 5G WILL MAINLY BE USED BY THE ARMY

The most important applications of 5G technology will not be in the civilian sector but in the military and secret services. Here are just a few examples of military applications that can be realized with 5G: Optimizing the use of hypersonic weapons; increasing the lethality and precision of killer drones and war robots by facial recognition and other features; developing “autonomous military vehicles” (i.e., robotic air, land, and sea vehicles capable of autonomous attack missions without even being remotely piloted). 5G mobile networks made up of assembly and disassembly towers will be set up in less than an hour. As part of NATO, the Pentagon is making it clear that allied territories need to be convinced of the military benefits of 5G. The network is being set up by private companies, which will charge civilian users for 5G, thus considerably reducing military expenditure compared with installing the network solely for the military in many countries.[38-40,49,66] 5G mmWaves will, therefore essentially have a warfare purpose.
5G technology originates from military technology because 5G phased array and beam steering capabilities originate from military radar technology.[85,132]

• ERRATIC PULSED MICROWAVE BEAM ATTACKS

Between 1953 and 1976, the Soviets irradiated the US embassy in Moscow with microwaves (2.5–4.0 GHz at intensities of up to 18 µW/cm2) at power densities well below the current limits recommended by the ICNIRP.[27,100] Despite this, symptoms were consistent with microwave sickness syndrome.[27] The cancer cases were not publicly acknowledged, but the official report was seriously questioned.[27,100]
From 2016 to 2017, state and CIA personnel stationed in Cuba (Havana) complained of several symptoms with similarities to those in Moscow: noises (many diplomats heard chirping, ringing, or grinding noises at night during episodes reportedly triggering health problems), hearing loss, tinnitus, sleep problems, headaches, cognitive problems dominate, sensations of pressure or vibration, vision, balance, speech problems, nosebleeds, neurological symptoms, brain injury, and brain swelling.[56,100,130] The findings suggest potential exposure to directional phenomena,[130] which would correspond to the use of pulsed RF microwaves.[56]

Since 2018, other diplomats, as well as US intelligence personnel in various locations around the world (China, Germany, Australia, Russia, Taiwan, Washington, Austria, Georgia, Poland, Colombia, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan), have complained of the same symptoms, named “Havana syndrome” (problems with balance and vertigo, coordination, eye movement; anxiety; irritability; brain damage; “cognitive fog”).[84] The acute symptoms include headache and nausea immediately following the sounds of loud buzzing or bursts. Testimonies report a directional sound coming from above or behind the head.[94] According to a report by US National Academy of Sciences, directed, pulsed RF microwave energy is the most likely cause of these symptoms.[84,94]

There are new weapons using microwave frequencies, able to disrupt brain function without any burning sensation. «The microwave auditory effect occurs from a miniscule but rapid (µs) rise of temperature (10−6 °C) in the brain from the absorption of pulsed microwave radiation. The sudden rise in temperature creates a thermoelastic expansion of the brain matter, which can launch a pressure wave that propagates through the head and is detected by the sensory hair cells in the cochlea. The nerve signal is then relayed to the central auditory system for perception and recognition». This auditory effect of microwaves can become a non-lethal or lethal weapon.[95] The target would first feel the pressure wave as a sound. This has been confirmed by numerous American diplomats, spies, soldiers, and officials in Havana. A small piece of equipment would suffice.[20]

To generate a high-power microwave-induced acoustic pressure level inside the human brain, the theoretical temperature rise induced by microwave pulses should not exceed 1°C, which is “safe,” according to ICNIRP.[96]

• "THE NEW WAR"

In 2021, two senior US Air Force officers presented a thesis at the Naval Postgraduate School (operated by the United States Navy) explaining that the war is now neurological: “Neurowar,” with cognitive functions as the main target.[58] Manipulating, influencing, and controlling both adversaries and the population are the objectives of this neurological warfare.[58] The manipulation of information to influence the population will have its limits when the population becomes aware of it. The next stage will, therefore, correspond directly to large-scale brain manipulation (p. 10).[58] For these senior US Air Force officers, Havana Syndrome (200 cases in 16 countries) corresponds to a new form of attack, but also of war, which is already underway, and whose target is the human brain (which is currently at the center of a biotechnological revolution).[58]
Neurological weapons aim to affect cognitive, emotional, and/or motor activity and capability to achieve specific and predictable behavior, that is, total mind control (p. 30-31).[58]

Neurological weapons can be either pharmacological, biological, or electromagnetic (RF directed energy weapons [DEWs], RF/acoustic weapons, ultrasonic weapons, high-powered microwaves, low-powered waves set at the right frequency, particle beams…) (p. 30-31).[58] The authors also suggest that cases of Havana Syndrome are the result of the use of a direct-energy microwave weapon (p. 86).[58] One of the problems of this new warfare (using DEWs) is the lack of medical strategies to deal with the unconventional injuries caused by this kind of weapon.[99]

Specific kinds of waves, modulated RFs between 0.4 and 3 GHz and an average power density at least as low as 400 µw/cm2, can cause noises or sounds heard as real directly in the head or just behind without causing any discernible injury to neural or labyrinthine tissues.[53,58] However, high-frequency microwaves, in particular mmWaves, have characteristics that make them more suitable for “stealth” attacks. Indeed, mmWaves cause less interference with ordinary electronics and cannot be detected with ordinary RF survey meters. In addition, the equipment is smaller and can be placed much closer to the target, enabling higher exposure levels.[51] Starting in the 1970s, Russian scientists showed that low-intensity microwaves could be used as a weapon to disorient and affect behavior and during interrogations.[100]

Both in the 50–70s and from 2016 to 2021, the symptoms of microwave attacks correspond, for the most part, to the same symptoms as EHS.[56] It should be noted that, on average, 3–5% of the population in many countries or regions of the world is EHS, and up to 13.3% of the population may be RF-sensitive.[17]
While the United Nations has put in place treaties against biological and chemical weapons, most neurological weapons currently fall into a legal and regulatory vacuum, as they do not correspond to any of these categories (p. 34).[58]

Consequently, the effects of ambient electromagnetic pollution caused by the microwaves of wireless technologies are comparable to the effects of pulsed RF directed energy (DE) microwave weapons. In addition to making people ill, the constant increase in the ambient level of high-frequency electromagnetic waves is changing people’s behavior.

• "NON-LETHAL" MICROWAVES DEWs
• (non lethal sounds nice, but may lower your life-expectancy & your quality of life)

A DEW is a system using DE primarily as a means to incapacitate, damage, disable, or destroy enemy equipment, facilities, and/or personnel.[34] Specific examples of DE use by the military include lasers, RF devices, high-power microwave, millimeter wave, and particle beam technology.[125]

« Millimeter wave DE has various non-lethal military applications, including crowd control and area denial. Although proven to be very safe, millimeter wave energy can produce significant injuries ».[57]

Thermal Effect of Microwave DEWs

The Active Denial System (ADS) produces beam high power mmWaves (95 GHz) to non-lethally heat the topmost layer of human skin, acting to effectively deny people access to locations (p. 18).[125] The system is mounted on a vehicle and used for crowd control, but it could be miniaturized and carried by a person [Figure 2] (p. 98-100).[58] In 2010, a patent explained the operation of a portable weapon radiating millimeter microwaves from 94 to 96 GHz (without being limited to this frequency range) and able to vary the power density for non-lethal purposes.[98]

• Figure 2:

Illustration of Active Denial System (photograph from [p. 100]).[58]

• Auditory effect of Microwave DEWs

In 1989, a patent showed that it was possible to induce sound in the head of an irradiated person using microwaves (0.1–10 GHz) modulated with a particular waveform while respecting the imposed standards.[22]

The US Army has developed a weapon system based on the auditory effect of microwaves, Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio (MEDUSA). The result is a strong sonic sensation in the human head when irradiated by specifically selected low-energy microwave pulses. It is specified that the system should be portable, require little energy, and be able to control a crowd or a single individual. At present, no one knows the status of this program.[20,96,126]

Rollout of 5G and wireless technologies analyzed from another viewpoint

In 2001, a document from NASA showed how the style of warfare could evolve in the 2025s. Attack and/or retaliation techniques include the use of microwave RFs. This kind of radiation corresponds to an anti-functional and anti-personnel weapon and is apparently legal. Used at high power, this weapon acts by heat source, but when used at low power (in µw/cm2 with a frequency range of 0.4–3 GHz) modulated at low frequency, this weapon alters cerebral functions, diminishes behavioral performance, and can become lethal. There is also talk of microwave RF towers used for selective anti-personnel purposes.[23]

As it is difficult to locate the source of the DE, DEWs are often used in special or covert operations. Authors of the US Air Force report assert that the world has reached a “ tipping point ” in which DE is now essential to successful military operations.[125]
Matthew and Kazaure[102] showed that due to the dipolar nature of the human body, the rollout of 5G technology at frequencies above 20 GHz will produce effects such as heating up of the body tissues due to electromagnetic field induction. This study established that any attempt to deploy 5G technology at ultra-high frequencies above 20 GHz corresponds to the deliberate use of an unconventional chemical weapon.[102]
Note that 5G mmWaves will use a frequency range extending to levels above 95 GHz, depending on the country.[118] Frequency bands up to 300 GHz have also been considered. In addition, the 6G network (planned for 2030) will add the frequency bands terahertz (THz), i.e. 300 GHz to 3 THz (submillimeter waves), to the mmWave bands, inducing a massive deployment of small cell networks.[13,29,31] In 2019, the French document from the French Ministry of Economy and Finance foresees the use of 5G at 38 and 60 GHz inside buildings. This document specifies that the induced accumulation of exposures (2G+, 3G, 4G, 5G, and IoT), their continuous nature over time, as well as the possible effects of millimeter emissions from the associated satellite coverage, have not been the subject of health and environmental impact studies (p. 33).[41]

• NANOMATERIALS: THE CASE OF GRAPHENE

The ideal nanomaterial for future medicine

From 2013 to 2023, the EU launched a huge research program on graphene (just one layer of carbon atoms whose stacking forms graphite), with the aim of its commercial application in many sectors, including biomedical and healthcare.[59,93] Graphene can be used to detect, treat, and manage diseases of the nervous system using neural implants (which can be used to record or stimulate electrical activity in nerve tissue) or for drug delivery.[44] According to the roadmap for graphene use in the medical sector, biosensors are already in use, neural interface from 2029, drug delivery, and bioelectronic medicine from 2030.[61] At the same time, the « Human Brain Project » was launched with the aim of better understanding how the brain works, mainly for medical purposes.[68]

Graphene oxide (GO) is considered a very good candidate for future vaccine adjuvants.[10,26,119,127,134,140] Graphene is also widely studied in dentistry, mainly as an anesthetic, but also for its antimicrobial action, regenerative dentistry, bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, physicomechanical property enhancement of dental biomaterials, and oral cancer treatment.[7,28,88,90,91,103,104,122] Inhalation of GO (for diagnostic purposes and to deliver drugs for respiratory diseases) is also being studied.[5]

In addition to the recognized biological toxicity of graphene-family nonmaterial,[110,133] these nanoparticles are already present in the environment and accumulate, for example, in food-chain plants.[131]

• COVID-19 vaccines

In 2022, a study showed that among various types of nanomaterials, GO and carbon nanotubes (cylindrically shaped nanostructures made by sheets of graphene rolled up to form hollow tubes) are among the possible adjuvants for COVID-19 vaccines.[4]
The presence of graphene in COVID-19 vaccines is totally refuted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).[42] However, not only EMA is tainted,[37] but also the presence of graphene, micro- and nanostructures as well as undeclared metal-containing components have been repeatedly detected in COVID-19 vaccines. Some of these results, discovered by several respected scientists in their fields, have not been published in peer-reviewed journals [Figure 3],[9,24,25], while others are available in the scientific literature.[71,72,137] GOs, reduced GOs (rGOs), and the related derivatives possess self-assembly capabilities enabling the construction of advanced graphene-based materials or functional systems,[124] which could partly explain the detection of certain nanostructures. By culture of COVID-19 vaccine samples (mainly Pfizer and Moderna), a study showed (using a stereomicroscope) the self-assembly of artificial structures of various shapes (animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, etc.), reacting, among other factors, to several frequencies of electromagnetic fields. The authors of this study assume that some form of nanotechnology (without specifying the exact nature of its components) was intentionally added to COVID-19 vaccines, whose purpose is to self-assemble into pre-programmed structures under the effect of different energy sources.[82]

Figure 3:



Some examples of COVID-19 vaccines analysis photographs. (a) 1h27’56’’; (b) 1h31’; (c) 1h31’17’’: Undeclared components of the COVID-19 vaccines.[9] (d and e): Microscopic objects and structures found in Pfizer vaccines by Dr. Campra.[24] Numerous other photographs of COVID-19 vaccine analyses showing microstructures, objects and graphene have been taken by Dr. Campra.[25]

In addition, analyses of blood samples from subjects after injections of COVID-19 vaccines showed the presence of particles, which, according to the authors of these publications, would correspond to GO.[33,72,83] This presence of graphene would contribute to the side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines.[6]

• Suitable for very high frequencies

Graphene can be used to build nanoantennas and transceivers.[29] Graphene nanomaterials (e.g., GO and rGO) are particularly well suited to interconnecting biomaterials with RF microwaves.[80] Graphene is widely used for its electrical properties and high conductivity.[32,60] In addition, GO has a high potential for transmitting signals at GHz ranges (0.5–40 GHz),[73] and millimeter frequencies seem perfectly adapted to graphene micro antennas.[76] A study showed that using a system of GO nanoparticles reacting to the electric field, a cell phone can control the rate of drug release remotely for on demand administration,[121] representing an example of a partnership between the pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries.

Moreover, a graphene monolayer can multiply frequencies from GHz to THz, generating electronic signals in the THz range with very high efficiency.[45,62] Graphene will, therefore, be well suited to directional radiation in the THz band for 6G communications.[2]

• Intrabody nanorobots

The literature confirms that graphene can be used as a base material for intrabody nanomachines (sensors, routers, antennas, etc.),[67,81,92,135] with the aim of wireless nanocommunications through internet between the human body and objects (Internet of Nano Things).[11,77] Carbon nanotubes are able to create hybrid systems with the natural neural system and affect specific cell behaviors.[46] Graphene can also be used to create a brain interface due to its perfect compatibility with the brain’s neural system,[47] opening the way to the exploitation and control of the brain.[50] The hydrogel allows these graphene nanomaterials to be accepted by the human body, thus representing the ideal interface in human-machine fusion.[138]

To perform complex tasks, intrabody nanorobots need to collaborate and organize themselves within a nanonetwork that can be hybrid wired/wireless. Communication between intrabody nanonetworks can be electromagnetic or molecular (the absence or presence of a certain type of molecule to encode messages digitally).[135] In addition, they self-power by harvesting energy from their environment (blood vessels) and their energy is mainly used for the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals.[8]

The efficient transmission of nanotechnology signals and data over the nanonetwork is managed by a routing system called Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks (CORONA).[123] The most suitable frequency band for these intrabody nanonetworks seems to be THz.[3,81] The few studies concerning the biological effects of THz already show consequences such as modification of the properties of cell membranes, pore formation, modulation of cell viability and proliferation. However, the authors point out that there is a lack of standardized experimental methods.[30]

Therefore, as some scientists suggest, these micro- and nanostructures observed in COVID-19 vaccines could be part of an intrabody network of wireless nanomachines, but the many conflicts of interest within the health authorities (e.g., EMA and WHO) inevitably lead to highly biased expert assessments and responses, which means that the public is disinformed by part of the scientific community, politicians, and the media.[37]
In addition, if this graphene-based nanomachine technology has been injected through COVID-19 vaccines to react with the electromagnetic environment, its operation with the GHz band is not only current but also appears to be evolutionary and projected in time to be activated by the THz waves of the 6G network around the 2030s.

• HUMAN-MACHINE FUSION (CYBORG)

Scientific publications and military documents clearly show that the goal for the coming years is human-machine fusion. Medicine will first employ graphene brain implants.[21] Carbon nanomaterials can be connected to implantable brain-computer interfaces (BCIs),[89] and graphene nanosensors appear suitable for operating non-invasive BCIs.[48]
Via the vascular circulation, nanorobots (some carbon nanomaterials are being studied) could cross the BBB and attach themselves to the axons of neurons in the brain, which could then connect to the internet cloud through a BCI.[101] It should be noted that optimizing a BCI seems to require the intervention of artificial intelligence (AI) to study brain functions, but also to identify and monitor the neurons that control behavior.[139] The huge volumes of data exchanged between the cloud and the human brain will require AI to manage these interactions, too.[101] 6G network applications (2030) will enable wireless brain-computer interaction.[31] While 5G will enable wireless communication between simple physical objects (IoT), 6G, in which AI will play a key role, will bring networked communication of humans, processes, files, and objects (Internet of Everything (IoE)), such as people-to-machine and people-to-people connections via the internet.[13,75]

In 2023, a NATO document on the biological functioning of cognitive warfare shows that one of the most promising nanotechnology projects is the development of integrated synthetic DNA. Although the document does not specify the materials used, this synthetic organic DNA could allow the creation of human-machine interfaces and is often referred to as the 47th human chromosome. The paper explains that neural nanotechnology can be used to bring nano-sized robots closer to a neuron via the bloodstream and enable the human brain to be linked directly (i.e., not intercepted by our senses) to a computer using AI. The author specifies that this is a two-way street: such an IA will, in turn, be linked to a human brain.[128]

The army uses neurotechnology to treat or “improve” soldiers.[58] Thus, advances in military neurotechnology, robotics, and AI will make the « cyborg warrior » (cyborg: Cybernetic organism), a weaponized brain-computer network powered by AI and neurocognitive augmentation.[105] In 2019, a US army document, coauthored by renowned neuroscientist James Giordano, shows that human-machine fusion will appear before 2050, with the aim of improving functional and structural human capacities through the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, AI, or any number of emerging technologies.[43] The four main objectives are ocular enhancements, restoration and programmed muscular control, auditory enhancement, and direct neural enhancement of the human brain for two-way data transfer. The assembly of nanoparticles in the brain (thus forming a BCI) could be positioned using directed magnetic fields. Although this report aims to present military cyborgs, the authors point out that not only will the civilian sector be in demand, but it is the medical sector that will familiarize the population with human-machine fusion and provide the military with a large proportion of the technological advances. In addition, the public will need to be educated about the benefits of becoming a cyborg. Cinema, media, literature, and governments must build messages to remove barriers to the adoption of these new technologies.[43]

The “benefits” (partly therapeutic, as it is also a question of increasing the capabilities of humans and other living beings) of designing hybrid systems between living beings and robotic systems have already begun in civil science.[54]

• CONCLUSION

Scientific literature shows that the use of modulated/pulsed/polarized microwave RFs from wireless technologies, even well below international limits designed to protect the public, causes a number of very serious health consequences: (1) increased oxidative stress (itself linked to numerous pathologies, inflammation, DNA damage, and aging). This oxidative status also generates cellular stress and, consequently the cell’s response to this stress (i.e., cell cycle arrest, the repair process, and then the elimination of damaged molecular debris). If stress is too great and there is excessive molecular damage, the cell is irreparable and dies (apoptosis). This artificially induced premature cell death can lead to degenerative diseases. If repair is incomplete, the proliferation of damaged cells can trigger cancer. The cellular stress response to an electromagnetic field depends on the type of cell, the duration of exposure, and the characteristics of the electromagnetic field.[78] (2) Changes in intracellular calcium metabolism. (3) Structural injuries of immune tissues and functional impairment in immune cells. (4) Damage to the reproductive system. (5) Brain cancers (glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma). (6) Increased BBB permeability (allowing certain toxins direct access to the central nervous system). (7) Increased risk of cardiomyopathy. (8) Microwave RF also leads to the onset of microwave syndrome, also known as EHS (i.e., headache, tinnitus, chronic insomnia, fatigue, nausea, dizziness, irritability, depressive tendencies, cognitive dysfunction, and impaired memory). Depending on the individual’s level of sensitivity and the duration of exposure, submission to the electromagnetic waves of wireless technologies induces behavioral changes.

NATO explains that cognitive warfare consists of exploiting emotions rooted in the subconscious, targeting the amygdala through the use of nanotechnology, biotechnology, and information technology, among others. The ultimate aim is to alter our perception of reality to affect our decision-making. NATO insists that this is a war without rules, that it is not science fiction, and that it is already happening, but also that cognitive attack is aimed at both military personnel and civilians. Targeting is hyper-personalized. Among civilians, those most vulnerable to such attacks may be, for example, those who lack confidence in governance and social structures.[128]

To sum up ... (For that see Part 2 of 2) at Project Avalon Forum Thread Post #1111



source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1161868

[ExomatrixTV]

To sum up (part 2 of 2)

• For decades, the military has been determined to find ways of mind control
• Low-power microwave beams could be used as a weapon to affect behavior
• Global attacks using microwaves induce the same symptoms (EHS) as irradiation with microwave radiation from wireless technologies
• Cognitive warfare and 5G radiation at 4.9 GHz both act on the amygdala, causing a change in behavior
• Above 20 GHz, 5G can be considered as a weapon
• Cognitive warfare personalizes targets; 5G directs its beams toward users
• There are powerful conflicts of interest between the telecommunications industry and the political sphere (e.g., WHO and EU)
• There are strong links between the telecommunications industry and the military (e.g., 5G)
• The pharmaceutical industry is studying and introducing to the market a nanomaterial (graphene) highly conductive of electromagnetic waves
• The pharmaceutical industry is known for its conflicts of interest with WHO, the EU, and its military links.

Consequently, we can conclude that the irradiation, with such standards, by the wireless technologies developed by the telecommunications industry corresponds to an intentional strategy from the military-industrial complex and part of the political establishment to affect the cognitive functions of the population. Graphene nanoparticles exacerbate, or will exacerbate (depending on whether they are already present in the body), the deleterious neurological effects of 5G and will progressively connect the human brain to the Internet through 6G, with the aim (a few years later) of merging man with machine


[Figure 4].

• Figure 4:

• Open in a new tab

Control and gradual transformation of humanity. EHS: Electro-Hypersensitivity, DECT: Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications, BCIs: Brain-Computer Interfaces, IoE: Internet of Everything.

Since the official channel for health information (WHO, media, and politics) is corrupted, it becomes necessary to disseminate verified and verifiable information. In addition, it is essential that all scientists, with no conflicts of interest, capable of publishing scientifically, with the appropriate equipment and an approved laboratory, analyze the components of all vaccines (including those in COVID-19) as well as dental anesthetics and publish their results in good scientific journals. If it proves that organisms indeed contain graphene, studies on chelating agents such as N-acetylcysteine and calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid would be necessary. It is also becoming vital to stay as far away as possible from powerful sources of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (antennas, WiFi, etc.) and to use all types of wireless technology as little as possible.

• Footnotes

How to cite this article: Deruelle F. Microwave radiofrequencies, 5G, 6G, graphene nanomaterials: Technologies used in neurological warfare. Surg Neurol Int. 2024;15:439. doi: 10.25259/SNI_731_2024

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.
Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.
Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.


REFERENCES

• 1.Adams RL, Williams RA. Biological effects of electromagnetic radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) Eurasian Communist Countries. Defense Intelligence Agency. 1976. Available from: orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/__us_ia_1976_biological_effects_of_electromagnetic_radiation.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 29]
• 2.Ai H, Kang Q, Wang W, Guo K, Guo Z. Multi-beam steering for 6G communications based on graphene metasurfaces. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:4784. doi: 10.3390/s21144784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3.Akkaş MA. Nano-sensor modelling for intra-body nano-networks. Wireless Pers Commun. 2021;118:3129–43. [Google Scholar]
• 4.Alphandéry E. Nano dimensions/adjuvants in COVID-19 vaccines. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10:1520–52. doi: 10.1039/d1tb02408f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Andrews JP, Joshi SS, Tzolos E, Syed MB, Cuthbert H, Crica LE, et al. First-in-human controlled inhalation of thin graphene oxide nanosheets to study acute cardiorespiratory responses. Nat Nanotechnol. 2024;19:705–14. doi: 10.1038/s41565-023-01572-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6.Anilanmert B, Rayimoglu G, Yonar FC. Side effects of COVID vaccines and the contribution of graphene. J Res Pharm. 2023;27:21–7. [Google Scholar]
• 7.Armaković S, Mirjanić Đ, Pelemiš SS, Armaković SJ. Understanding interactions between graphene and local anesthetic molecules applied in dentistry-Toward the prolonged effects of local anesthesia. J Mol Liquids. 2022;36:120301. [Google Scholar]
• 8.Asghari M. Intrabody hybrid perpetual nanonetworks based on simultaneous wired and wireless nanocommunications. Nano Commun Networks. 2022;84:100406. [Google Scholar]
• 9.Austrian Research Group . Austrian Research Group. 2021. Press conference: Undeclared components of the COVID-19 vaccines. Pathological institute in Reutlingen. Available from: pathologie-konferenz.de/en https://odysee.com/@en:a5/PK_Tot-durch-Impfung_english : a [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Bai Q, Wang Z, An Y, Tian J, Li Z, Yang Y, et al. Chitosanfunctionalized graphene oxide as adjuvant in HEV P239 vaccine. Vaccine. 2022;40:7613–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11.Balghusoon AO, Mahfoudh S. Routing protocols for wireless nanosensor networks and internet of nano things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access. 2020;8:200724–48. [Google Scholar]
• 12.Balmori A. Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer. Environ Res. 2022;214:113851. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13.Banafaa M, Shayea I, Din J, Azmi MH, Alashbi A, Daradkeh IY, et al. 6G Mobile communication technology: Requirements, targets, applications, challenges, advantages, and opportunities. Alexandria Eng J. 2023;64:245–74. [Google Scholar]
• 14.Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S. Bioeffects of microwave--a brief review. Bioresour Technol. 2003;87:155–9. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15.Bektas H, Dasdag S, Altindag F, Akdag MZ, Yegin K, Algul S. Effects of 3.5-GHz radiofrequency radiation on energy-regulatory hormone levels in the blood and adipose tissue. Bioelectromagnetics. 2024;45:209–17. doi: 10.1002/bem.22498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16.Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity nonionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018;242:643–58. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 17.Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment. Environ Res. 2022;212:113374. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 18.Belyaev I. Nonthermal biological effects of microwaves: Current knowledge, further perspective, and urgent needs. Electromagn Biol Med. 2009;24:375–403. [Google Scholar]
• 19.BioInitiative Working Group 2012 BioInitiative report. Available from: bioinitiative.org [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 11]
• 20.Borger J. Microwave weapons that could cause Havana Syndrome exist, experts say. The Guardian. 2021. Available from: theguardian.com/science/2021/jun/02/microwave-weapons-havana-syndrome-experts [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 09]
• 21.Bramini M, Alberini G, Colombo E, Chiacchiaretta M, DiFrancesco ML, Maya-Vetencourt JF, et al. Interfacing graphene-based materials with neural cells. Front Syst Neurosci. 2018;12:12. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22.Brunkan WB. Hearing system. US4877027A. 1989. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4877027A/en [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 21]
• 23.Bushnell DN. Future strategic issues/future warfare [Circa 2025]. Chief Scientist. NASA Langley Research Center. 2001. p. 48. 49, 50, 55, 98, 103. Available from: archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025 https://archive.org/download/Nasa-do...are-circa-2025 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 22]
• 24.Campra P. DNA crystals nanotechnologie in Covid-19 vaccines? 2022. Available from: researchgate.net/publication/358284707_dna_crystals_nanotechnology_in_covid19_vaccines-interviewwithdrcamprainmadrid2022 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 25.Campra P. Microstructures in Covid Vaccines: ¿Inorganic Crystals or Wireless Nanosensors Network? 2021. Available from: researchgate.net/publication/356507702_microstructures_in_covid_vaccines_inorganic_crystals_or_wireless_nanosensors_network [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 20]. Detection of Graphene in Covid-19 Vaccines; 2021. Available from: researchgate.net/publication/355979001_detection_of_graphene_in_covid19_vaccines [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 20]. Microscopic Objects Frequently Observed in mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines; 2021. Available from: researchgate.net/publication/356002064_microscopic_objects_frequently_observed_in_mrna_covid19_vaccines [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 20]
• 26.Cao W, He L, Cao W, Huang X, Jia K, Dai J. Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant. Acta Biomater. 2020;112:14–28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 27.Carpenter DO. The microwave syndrome or electro-hypersensitivity: Historical background. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30:217–22. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 28.Castro-Rojas MA, Vega-Cantu YI, Cordell GA, Rodriguez-Garcia A. Dental applications of carbon nanotubes. Molecules. 2021;26:4423. doi: 10.3390/molecules26154423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 29.Chataut R, Akl R. Massive MIMO systems for 5G and beyond networks-overview, recent trends, challenges, and future research direction. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20:2753. doi: 10.3390/s20102753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 30.Cherkasova OP, Serdyukov DS, Ratushnyak AS, Nemova EF, Kozlov EN, Shidlovskii YV, et al. Effects of terahertz radiation on living cells: A review. Opt Spectrosc. 2020;128:855–66. [Google Scholar]
• 31.Chowdhury MZ, Shahjalal M, Ahmed S, Jang YM. 6G wireless communication systems: Applications, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions. IEEE Open J Commun Soc. 2020;1:957–75. [Google Scholar]
• 32.ChunKan T, Rui T, Tianyou K, MengYao H, YuJing W, MingJie Y, et al. Graphene superconductivity at room-temperature of a wide range and standard atmosphere, based on vacuum channels and white-light interferometry. Adv Electron Mater. 2022;8:2100595. [Google Scholar]
• 33.Cipelli RB, Giovannini F, Pisano G. Dark-field microscopic analysis on the blood of 1,006 symptomatic persons after anti-COVID mRNA injections from pfizer/BioNtech or moderna. Int J Vaccine Theory Pract Res. 2022;2:385–444. [Google Scholar]
• 34.Congressional research service U.S. Army weapons-related directed energy (DE) programs: Background and potential issues for congress. R45098. 2018 Available from: crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45098 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 16] [Google Scholar]
• 35.Deruelle F. The different sources of electromagnetic fields: Dangers are not limited to physical health. Electromagn Biol Med. 2020;39:166–75. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2020.1737811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 36.Deruelle F. Are persistent aircraft trails a threat to the environment and health? Rev Environ Health. 2021;37:407–21. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 37.Deruelle F. The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19. Surg Neurol Int. 2022;13:475. doi: 10.25259/SNI_377_2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 38.Dinucci M. The hidden military use of 5G technology. Voltaire network. 2019. Available from: voltairenet.org/article199819.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03]
• 39.Dinucci M. 5G. the new track of the arms race. Voltaire network. 2020. Available from:voltairenet.org/article210082.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03]
• 40.Dinucci M. Le côté obscur de la 5G: L’utilisation militaire. Voltaire network. 2020. Available from: voltairenet.org/article210788.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03]
• 41.Dron D, Magne Y, Pavel I. Enjeux des usages industriels et commerciaux des ondes non ionisantes électromagnétiques et acoustiques. 2019. Conseil général de l’économie N 2018/12/CGE/SR. Édité par: Ministère de l’économie et des finances. p. p95. Available from: documentation.insp.gouv.fr/insp/doc/viepublique/3951e2ee6f57ee28c28087b7d0707b66/enjeux-des-usages-industriels-et-commerciaux-des-ondesnon-ionisantes-electromagnetiques-et-acoustiq?_lg=fr-FR https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/...et-acoustiques [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03]
• 42.EMA Answer on behalf of the European Commission. P-000303/2022(ASW) 2022. Available from: europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2022-000303-ASW_EN.html [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 11]
• 43.Emanuel P, Walper S, DiEuliis D, Klein N, Petro JB, Giordano J. Cyborg soldier 2050: human/machine fusion and the implications for the future of the DoD U.S. Army. CCDC CBC-TR-1599. 2019 Available from: apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1083010 [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 30] [Google Scholar]
• 44.European Commission Graphene-based revolutions in ICT and beyond. Biomedical advances through use of grapheme. 2018. Available from: cordis.europa.eu/article/id/243655-biomedical-advances-through-use-of-graphene [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 45.European Commission Graphene boosts GHz signals into terahertz territory. 2023. Available from: cordis.europa.eu/article/id/124280-graphene-boosts-ghz-signals-into-terahertz-territory [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 46.Fabbro A, Bosi S, Ballerini L, Prato M. Carbon nanotubes: Artificial nanomaterials to engineer single neurons and neuronal networks. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012;3:611–8. doi: 10.1021/cn300048q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 47.Fabbro A, Scaini D, León V, Vázquez E, Cellot G, Privitera G, et al. Graphene-based interfaces do not alter target nerve cells. ACS Nano. 2016;10:615–23. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 48.Faisal SN, Do TN, Torzo T, Leong D, Pradeepkumar A, Lin C, et al. Noninvasive sensors for brain-machine interfaces based on micropatterned epitaxial graphene. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2023;6:5440–7. [Google Scholar]
• 49.Fields C. Defense science Board. Washington DC, United States: 2019. Defense Science Board Task Force: Defense applications of 5G network technology. Available from: apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1078719 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 05] [Google Scholar]
• 50.Fogden S. Graphene and Neurons-the best of friends. Graphene Flagship. 2016. Available from: grapheneflagship.eu/materials/news/graphene-based-interfaces-do-not-alter-target-nerve-cells [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 28]
• 51.Foster KR, Garrett DC, Ziskin MC. Can the microwave auditory effect be “Weaponized”? Front Public Health. 2021;9:788613. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.788613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 52.Frank JW, Melnick Ronald L, Moskowitz JM. A critical appraisal of the WHO 2024 systematic review of the effects of RF-EMF exposure on tinnitus, migraine/headache, and non-specific symptoms. Rev Environ Health. 2024. Available from: degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2024-0069/html.
• 53.Frey AH. Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy. J Appl Physiol. 1962;17:689–92. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 54.Fukuda T. Cyborg and bionic systems: Signposting the future. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2020;2020:1310389. doi: 10.34133/2020/1310389. (See mission and scope of Journal: spj.science.org/page/cbsystems/about) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 55.Georgiou CD, Kalaitzopoulou E, Skipitari M, Papadea P, Varemmenou A, Gavriil V, et al. Physical differences between man-made and cosmic microwave electromagnetic radiation and their exposure limits, and radiofrequencies as generators of biotoxic free radicals. Radiation. 2022;2:285–302. [Google Scholar]
• 56.Golomb BA. Diplomats’ mystery illness and pulsed radiofrequency/microwave radiation. Neural Comput. 2018;30:2882–985. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 57.Government of Canada Directed energy weapons. 2024. Available from: science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/emerging-technology-trend-cards/directed-energy-weapons [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 16]
• 58.Gramm JD, Branagan BA. Neurowar is here! Master’s Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943-5000. 2021 Available from: apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1164923.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 12] [Google Scholar]
• 59.Graphene Flagship. 2024. Available from: grapheneflagship.eu [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 60.Graphene Flagship. Healing wounds with graphene. 2020. Available from: graphene-flagship.eu/media/8d8d1c8f4f989cf/graphene-healthcare-minimag-2020.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 61.Graphene Flagship Technology and Innovation Roadmap. 2024. Available from: graphene-flagship.eu/industrialisation/roadmap https://graphene-flagship.eu/industr...l-applications https://graphene-flagship.eu/focus/biomedical [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 62.Hafez HA, Kovalev S, Deinert JC, Mics Z, Green B, Awari N, et al. Extremely efficient terahertz high-harmonic generation in graphene by hot Dirac fermions. Nature. 2018;561:507–11. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0508-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 63.Hajam YA, Rani R, Ganie SY, Sheikh TA, Javaid D, Qadri SS, et al. Oxidative stress in human pathology and aging: Molecular mechanisms and perspectives. Cells. 2022;11:552. doi: 10.3390/cells11030552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 64.Han B, Ming Z, Zhao Y, Wen T, Xie M. Influence of space electromagnetic radiation on physical characteristics of atmospheric suspended micro particles. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1171:012063. [Google Scholar]
• 65.Hedendahl LK, Carlberg M, Koppel T, Hardell L. Measurements of radiofrequency radiation with a body-borne exposimeter in Swedish schools with WiFi. Front Public Health. 2017;5:279. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 66.Hoehn JR, Sayler KM. Congressional Research Service 2020, 2022, 2023. National security implications of fifth generation (5G) mobile technologies. Available from: crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11251/3 https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1166539 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11251 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 05] [Google Scholar]
• 67.Huang H, Su S, Wu N, Wan H, Wan S, Bi H, et al. Graphene-based sensors for human health monitoring. Front Chem. 2019;7:399. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 68.Human Brain Project. 2023. Available from: humanbrainproject.eu/en/ [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 12]
• 69.ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz) Health Phys. 2020;118:483–524. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 70.International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. Environ Health. 2022;21:92. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 71.Jeon KY. Moving and living micro-organisms in the COVID-19 vaccines-prevention, early treatment cocktails for covid-19 and detoxification methods to reduce sequels of Covid-19 vaccines. Am J Epidemiol Public Health. 2022;6:1–6. [Google Scholar]
• 72.Jeon KY, Park S, Broudy D, Joo HD. A presentation of analyses of COVID-19 vaccine samples, blood samples, urine samples, foot bath samples, sitz bath samples, and skin-extract samples. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2023;4:188–217. [Google Scholar]
• 73.Kim WK, Jung Y, Cho JH, Kang JY, Oh J, Kang HS, et al. Radio-frequency characteristics of graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97:193103. [Google Scholar]
• 74.Kostoff RN, Heroux P, Aschner M, Tsatsakis A. Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions. Toxicol Lett. 2020;323:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 75.Kremenska AG, Lekova AK, Dimitrov GP. 2022 International Conference on Information Technologies (InfoTech) Varna, Bulgaria: 2022. EEG brain-computer interfaces for internet of everything (IoE) pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
• 76.Kumar C, Raghuwanshi SK, Kumar V. Graphene based microstrip patch antenna on photonic crystal substrate for 5G application. Front Mater. 2022;9:1079588. [Google Scholar]
• 77.Kumar MR. A compact graphene based nano-antenna for communication in nano-network. J Inst Electron Comput. 2019;1:17–27. [Google Scholar]
• 78.Lai H, Levitt BB. Cellular and molecular effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Rev Environ Health. 2023;39:519–29. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2023-0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 79.Landau E. Biological effects and health hazards of microwave radiation, proceedings on an international symposium, October, 1973. Am J Public Health. 1975;65:751. [Google Scholar]
• 80.Lee HJ, Yook JG. Graphene nanomaterials-based radio-frequency/microwave biosensors for biomaterials detection. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:952. doi: 10.3390/ma12060952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 81.Lee SJ, Jung C (Andrew), Choi K, Kim S. Design of wireless nanosensor networks for intrabody application. Int J Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015;11:1–12. [Google Scholar]
• 82.Lee YM, Broudy D. Real-time self-assembly of stereomicroscopically visible artificial constructions in incubated specimens of mRNA products mainly from pfizer and Moderna: A comprehensive longitudinal study. Int J Vaccine Theory Pract Res. 2024;3:1180–244. [Google Scholar]
• 83.Lee YM, Park S, Jeon KY. Foreign materials in blood samples of recipients of COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Vaccine Theory Pract Res. 2022;2:249–65. [Google Scholar]
• 84.Le Figaro. Syndrome de La Havane: Le chef de la CIA à Vienne limogé. 2021. Available from:lefigaro.fr/international/syndrome-de-la-havane-le-chef-de-la-cia-avienne-limoge-20210924 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 09]
• 85.Levitt BB, Lai HC, Manville AM. Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, part 1. Rising ambient EMF levels in the environment. Rev Environ Health. 2021;37:81–122. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 86.Levitt BB, Lai HC, Manville AM. Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: How species interact with natural and man-made EMF. Rev Environ Health. 2021;37:327–406. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 87.Levitt BB, Lai HC, Manville AM., 2nd Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: What research tells us about an ecosystem approach. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1000840. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 88.Li H, Xie M. Synthesis of bupivacaine adsorbed reduced graphene oxide and its in-vitro local anesthetic, enhanced antimicrobial activity against dental implant pathogens. J Clust Sci. 2024;35:623–33. [Google Scholar]
• 89.Li J, Cheng Y, Gu M, Yang Z, Zhan L, Du Z. Sensing and stimulation applications of carbon nanomaterials in implantable brain-computer interface. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:5182. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 90.Li W, Zhang G, Wei X. Lidocaine-loaded reduced graphene oxide hydrogel for prolongation of effects of local anesthesia: In vitro and in vivo analyses. J Biomater Appl. 2021;35:1034–42. doi: 10.1177/0885328220988462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 91.Li X, Liang X, Wang Y, Wang D, Teng M, Xu H, et al. Graphene-based nanomaterials for dental applications: Principles, current advances, and future outlook. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:804201. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.804201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 92.Liaskos C, Tsioliaridou A, Ioannidis S, Kantartzis N, Pitsillides A. 2016 IEEE International conference on communications (ICC) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2016. A deployable routing system for nanonetworks; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
• 93.Lin H, Buerki-Thurnherr T, Kaur J, Wick P, Pelin M, Tubaro A, et al. Environmental and health impacts of graphene and other two-dimensional materials: A graphene flagship perspective. ACS Nano. 2024;18:6038–94. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 94.Lin JC. The havana syndrome and microwave weapons [Health Matters] IEEE Microwave Magazine. 2021;22:13–4. [Google Scholar]
• 95.Lin JC. The microwave auditory effect. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microwaves Med Biol. 2022;6:16–28. [Google Scholar]
• 96.Lin JC. Directed-energy weapons research becomes official [Health Matters] IEEE Microwave Magazine. 2022;23:13–90. [Google Scholar]
• 97.Lin JC. Incongruities in recently revised radiofrequency exposure guidelines and standards. Environ Res. 2023;222:115369. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 98.Lowell RF, Brown KW, Reynolds AV, Rattray AA. Solid-state non-lethal directed energy weapon. US7784390B1. 2010. Available from: patents.google.com/patent/US7784390 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 24]
• 99.Lyon RF, Gramm J, Branagan B, Houck SC. Implications of neurological directed-energy weapons for military medicine. J Spec Oper Med. 2022;22:104–7. doi: 10.55460/0JAL-JIJT. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 100.Martinez JA. The Moscow signal epidemiological study 40 years on. Rev Environ Health. 2019;34:13–24. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 101.Martins NR, Angelica A, Chakravarthy K, Svidinenko Y, Boehm FJ, Opris I, et al. Human brain/cloud interface. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:112. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 102.Matthew UO, Kazaure JS. Chemical polarization effects of electromagnetic field radiation from the novel 5G network deployment at ultra high frequency. Health Technol (Berl) 2021;11:305–17. doi: 10.1007/s12553-020-00501-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 103.Mirjanić V, Armaković S, Pelemiš SS, Armaković SJ. Investigating interactions between derivatives of graphene nanosheets and articaine for prolonged dental anesthetic effects: A multiscale modeling study. J Mol Liquids. 2024;395:123891. [Google Scholar]
• 104.Nizami MZ, Takashiba S, Nishina Y. Graphene oxide: A new direction in dentistry. Appl Mater Today. 2020;19:100576. [Google Scholar]
• 105.Nørgaard K, Linden-Vørnle M. Cyborgs, neuroweapons, and network command. Scand J Military Stud. 2021;4:94–107. [Google Scholar]
• 106.Nyberg NR, McCredden JE, Weller SG, Hardell L. The European Union prioritises economics over health in the rollout of radiofrequency technologies. Rev Environ Health. 2022;39:47–64. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2022-0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 107.Nyberg R, McCredden J, Hardell L. The European Union assessments of radiofrequency radiation health risks - another hard nut to crack (Review) Rev Environ Health. 2023. Availabel from: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37609829/ [DOI] [PubMed]
• 108.Nyberg R, Nilsson M, Hardell L. Adopting scientifically invalid assumptions of no risks for deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication by the EU commission is harmful to human health and the environment. Ann Clin Case Rep. 2024;9:2572. [Google Scholar]
• 109.Oshima N, Nishida A, Shimodera S, Tochigi M, Ando S, Yamasaki S, et al. The suicidal feelings, self-injury, and mobile phone use after lights out in adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012;37:1023–30. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 110.Ou L, Song B, Liang H, Liu J, Feng X, Deng B, et al. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: A general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016;13:57. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 111.Pall ML. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016;75:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 112.Pall ML. WiFi is an important threat to human health. Environ Res. 2018;164:405–16. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 113.Panagopoulos DJ. Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019;781:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 114.Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo GL. Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14914. doi: 10.1038/srep14914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 115.Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Yakymenko I, Chrousos GP. Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review) Int J Oncol. 2021;59:92. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 116.Peleg M, Berry EM, Deitch M, Nativ O, Richter E. On radar and radio exposure and cancer in the military setting. Environ Res. 2023;216:114610. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 117.Petrov IR. Influence of microwave radiation on the organism of man and animals, national aeronautics and space administration (NASA) 1972. pp. 1–226. Available from: orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/influence_of_microwave_radiation_on_the_organism_of_man_and_animals.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 29]
• 118.Qualcomm Global 5G spectrum update and innovations for future wireless systems. 2023. Available from: qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dm-assets/documents/global-5g-spectrum-status-and-innovations-for-future-wireless-systems.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 17]
• 119.Qin H, Yang YB, Xiangnan D, Xiaoshine D, Wang S. Preparation and application of pachyman nano adjuvant based on graphene oxide and adjuvant/antigen co-delivery vaccine. 2020. Available from: patents.google.com/patent/CN112089834A/en [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]
• 120.Qin TZ, Wang X, Du JZ, Lin JJ, Xue YZ, Guo L, et al. Effects of radiofrequency field from 5G communications on the spatial memory and emotionality in mice. Int J Environ Health Res. 2024;34:316–27. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2022.2149708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 121.Sahoo D, Mitra T, Chakraborty K, Sarkar P. Remotely controlled electro-responsive on-demand nanotherapy based on amine-modified graphene oxide for synergistic dual drug delivery. Mater Today Chem. 2022;25:100987. [Google Scholar]
• 122.Song T, Gu K, Wang W, Wang H, Yang Y, Yang L, et al. Prolonged suppression of neuropathic pain by sequential delivery of lidocaine and thalidomide drugs using PEGylated graphene oxide. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:3851–60. doi: 10.1002/jps.24598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 123.Tsioliaridou A, Liaskos C, Ioannidis S, Pitsillides A. En: Proceedings of the second annual international conference on nanoscale computing and communication. 2015. CORONA: A coordinate and routing system for nanonetworks; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
• 124.Tupone MG, Panella G, d’Angelo M, Castelli V, Caioni G, Catanesi M, et al. An update on graphene-based nanomaterials for neural growth and central nervous system regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:13047. doi: 10.3390/ijms222313047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 125.US Air Force Directed energy futures 2060: Visions for the next 40 years of U.S. Department of defense directed energy technologies. Air force Research Laboratory. AFRL-2021-1152. 2021 Available from: defenseinnovationmarketplace.dtic.mil/2022-directed-energy-and-non-lethal-weapons https://www.afrl.af.mil/Portals/90/D...nce_number.pdf https://pdf4pro.com/view/directed-en...60-6ee6f0.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 16] [Google Scholar]
• 126.US Navy MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) WaveBand Corporation. 2004. Available from: web.archive.org/web/20080409063721/ http://www.navysbirprogram.com/NavyS...0-950CE2E19D08 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 21]
• 127.Vakili B, Karami-Darehnaranji M, Mirzaei E, Hosseini F, Nezafat N. Graphene oxide as novel vaccine adjuvant. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;125:111062. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 128.Van der Klaauw C. Cognitive warfare. NATO. The three swords. 2023. pp. 97–101. Available from: jwc.nato.int/newsroom/The-Three-Swords-Magazine https://www.jwc.nato.int/application...06/issue39.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 03]
• 129.Van Scharen H. The International Commission on NonIonizing Radiation Protection: conflicts of interest, corporate capture and the push for 5G, members of the European Parliament – Michèle Rivasi (Europe Écologie) and Klaus Buchner (Ökologisch-Demokratische Partei) 2020. Available from: ehtrust.org/the-international-commission-on-non-ionizing-radiation-protection-conflicts-of-interest-corporate-capture-and-the-push-for-5g [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 31]
• 130.Verma R, Swanson RL, Parker D, Ould Ismail AA, Shinohara RT, Alappatt JA, et al. Neuroimaging findings in US government personnel with possible exposure to directional phenomena in Havana, Cuba. JAMA. 2019;322:336–47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 131.Wang Q, Li C, Wang Y, Que X. Phytotoxicity of graphene family nanomaterials and its mechanisms: A review. Front Chem. 2019;7:292. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 132.Weller S, McCredden JE. Understanding the public voices and researchers speaking into the 5G narrative. Front Public Health. 2024;11:1339513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1339513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 133.Xiaoli F, Qiyue C, Weihong G, Yaqing Z, Chen H, Junrong W, et al. Toxicology data of graphene-family nanomaterials: An update. Arch Toxicol. 2020;94:1915–39. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02717-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 134.Xu L, Xiang J, Liu Y, Xu J, Luo Y, Feng L, et al. Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity. Nanoscale. 2016;8:3785–95. doi: 10.1039/c5nr09208f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 135.Yang K, Bi D, Deng Y, Zhang R, Rahman MM, Ali NA, et al. A comprehensive survey on hybrid communication in context of molecular communication and terahertz communication for body-centric nanonetworks. IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multi-Scale Commun. 2020;6:107–33. [Google Scholar]
• 136.Yao C, Dong J, Ren K, Sun L, Wang H, Zhang J, et al. Accumulative effects of multifrequency microwave exposure with 1.5 GHz and 2.8 GHz on the structures and functions of the immune system. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:4988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 137.Young RO. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy reveals graphene oxide in CoV-19 vaccines. Acta Sci Med Sci. 2022;6:98–111. [Google Scholar]
• 138.Yuk H, Wu J, Zhao X. Hydrogel interfaces for merging humans and machines. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7:935–52. [Google Scholar]
• 139.Zhang X, Ma Z, Zheng H, Li T, Chen K, Wang X, et al. The combination of brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence: applications and challenges. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:712. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 140.Zhou Q, Gu H, Sun S, Zhang Y, Hou Y, Li C, et al. Large-sized graphene oxide nanosheets increase DC-T-cell synaptic contact and the efficacy of DC vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e2102528. doi: 10.1002/adma.202102528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Surgical Neurology International are provided here courtesy of Scientific Scholar

ACTIONS

• View on publisher site
• PDF (1.4 MB)

RESOURCES

On this page

• Abstract
• INTRODUCTION
• INTENTIONAL IRRADIATION OF THE POPULATION
• 5G WILL MAINLY BE USED BY THE ARMY
• PULSED MICROWAVE BEAM ATTACKS
• THE NEW WAR
• NON-LETHAL MICROWAVES DEWs
• NANOMATERIALS: THE CASE OF GRAPHENE
• HUMAN-MACHINE FUSION (CYBORG)
• CONCLUSION
• Footnotes
• Ethical approval
• Declaration of patient consent
• Financial support and sponsorship
• Conflicts of interest
• Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
• Disclaimer
• REFERENCES

source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1161868

[ExomatrixTV]

Someone of the Project Avalon Forum added the tag "5g fear porn" to this thread without revealing its identity ... I wonder if that same person is still with us ... if so, let me know if you still agree with that action and explain why, if you have any decency.

• before you answer, dig deeper in the embedded peer reviewed science publication PDF publication directly from the source:

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳