Fauci

[ExomatrixTV]

• Wuhan Bioweapon CONFIRMED? Were You RIGHT After 5 years?!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=N_jhcyNeDv8

Neil Oliver EXPOSES the lies and deception surrounding the COVID pandemic, from the origins of the virus to the shocking failures of the ongoing inquiry. Were we manipulated? Was COVID used to strip away our freedoms? The mainstream narrative is falling apart, but will those responsible ever be held accountable? And what new restrictions might be coming next?

[TrumanCash]

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis joined growing calls for states to prosecute Dr. Anthony Fauci for his role in the COVID-19 pandemic,

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis joined growing calls for states to prosecute Dr. Anthony Fauci for his role in the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting during a recent speech that the state's new attorney general could pursue such an investigation, the Florida Bulldog reported.

Read complete article at https://greenmedinfo.com/content/flo...demic-response

[onawah]

Trump Admin Hints At CRIMINAL CHARGES For Fauci In BOMBSHELL Report w/Angry Cops
Timcast IRL
494K followers
4/18/25


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6pv175/?pub=4

[mountain_jim]

copying here

(and more relevant current posts in this thread):
The SARS-CoV-2 virus WAS engineered. At last we have proof.

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1913372141673758961

Clandestine
@WarClandestine
·
15h
Today, Trump pretty much accused Fauci of crimes against humanity, and showed how the Biden regime are complicit by granting Fauci a pardon beginning in 2014, which is when Fauci offshored gain of function research to places like Wuhan and Ukraine.

Kind of a big deal.



Clandestine
@WarClandestine
·
17h
Trump and his administration already know the depths of criminality surrounding Covid and its man-made origins.

What we are witnessing now, is the public disclosure part.

How do you tell billions of people they were victims of a bioweapon attack?

Very slowly.


https://x.com/catturd2/status/1913404755998580794

Catturd ™
@catturd2
·
14h
It should’ve already happened. Arrest Fauci.
Quote
Mischief 🌿🌹🌿🌹🌿🌹🌿🌹🌿
@gracieback2
·
Apr 17
I have a dream

How about you?🥰

[ExomatrixTV]

• White House OFFICIALLY Accuses Fauci Of COVID Crimes!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DWW9EB1cz98

The Trump White House re-launched the govenrment’s official COVID-19 website on Friday. The revamped site blames the origins of the coronavirus on a lab leak in China while criticizing former President Joe Biden, former top U.S. health official Anthony Fauci and the World Health Organization. The website is also critical of steps like social distancing, mask mandates and lockdowns.

Jimmy and Kurt Metzger discuss how not even this level of government sanctioned critique of the nation’s COVID policy will be sufficient to shake some hopeless deadenders in the media and comedy community who refuse to engage in even the most cursory reexamination of their mistaken views over the pandemic.

• whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Fauci will testify, either voluntarily or involuntarily: Sen. Rand Paul | National Report:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=T2o8KxFG_AU

On Tuesday's "National Report," Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said Dr. Anthony Fauci will come before Congress and testify under oath regarding gain-of-function research in China.

[ExomatrixTV]

• RFK Jr.: Dr. Fauci knew he needed a pardon:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MMKxIrGCaVs

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. weighs in on President Donald Trump banning China's gain-of-function research and defends 'dialing back' health agencies on 'The Ingraham Angle.'

[truthserum]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fwXpmk9y-ZQ

What are your thoughts?

[ExomatrixTV]

• New details emerge on the government cover-up of Covid-19 Vaccine risks | Redacted News:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WOqe8CvPgT8

[grapevine]

Fauci tests on foster children

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Pmpv0vS8r2I

[ExomatrixTV]

• Rand Paul Says He’s STILL Coming For Anthony Fauci!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7ACNL8tTvQU

Dr. Anthony Fauci is not out of the woods yet, as Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has indicated he plans to press the former NAIAD head on charges relating to gain of function research that led to the COVID pandemic. Jimmy Dore & Kurt Metzger discuss past allegations about unethical medical experiments and Fauci’s handling of pandemic responses. They accuse him of concealing effective treatments like hydroxychloroquine, participating in dangerous research, and misleading the public about COVID-19 origins. They also link Fauci to systemic corruption, citing political figures, pharmaceutical influence, and lack of accountability for powerful elites.

[onawah]

Foster kids frequent victims of "ET abduction"
Though it's still unclear how many abduction cases are actually done by actual ETs if any, and how many are done by secret government projects, Dark Journalist recently uncovered evidence recently that goes into the background of the Foster family, which were instrumental in starting that whole system of "fostering" children (the system having actually been named after them).
There was also a UFO crash case on the Texas ranch owned by the Fosters, the site known via association with the Roswell UFO crash.
DJ revealed these findings to Dr. Joseph Farrell in one of their recent discussions and Farrell was visibly stunned.
I don't remember all of the DJ episodes this has been mentioned in (in passing, at least) but it's been in several of the more recent ones.

I think the first mention is in this episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAXnvc3fikI

...Starting at 31:08i minutes in.
The transcript (I edited it a bit) begins with this:

"This says here about 25 miles northwest of Roswell. The Roswell Foster Ranch where the crash happens is 60 miles northwest. So you're half the way there. But you have to understand this photo is from 1932. So we're talking 15 years before the incident takes place.

It's crucial to understand there's something already unusual going on in relation to the location. The deeper you get into it, the weirder it is. Then you start to
wonder about the ownership of the ranch where the Roswell crash happens.
When I got into that aspect, that's the trail that I've been on for a while.
But before we get to the owners of the ranch, I'm going to show you the correlation.

Let's get into a little bit about the crash and the correlation to the Kennedy assassination, this overlap which I mentioned last week. It's explosive and could reignite the entire case.
So the crash that happens-- basically there's a number of different accounts. There's great researchers out there who've already taken it down. '
What I've really done is just drill down to the basics on what took place.
So for our purposes tonight, what we're going to do is say that there was a major storm that was going on.
In between some of those thunderclaps, people heard something that was dramatically louder, that sounded like a bomb going off.
A few people actually had a visual on what had taken place there, including a guy who for some reason was out at night checking out his windmill.

What he said is he saw something that looked like a red blinking light heading right
towards his ranch. A number of them heard this incredible sound and everybody was kind of freaked out, but nobody really knew what to do about it.
The fact that they, you know, they didn't hear that there there was any atomic exchange, so they went back to bed.
Um, so this crash that takes place when we get to this particular ranch that M. Brazzle is the foreman for.
Brazzle is, you know, from all accounts, just a good old cowboy, like a hardcore guy, rancher. He has a family there and he's the foreman for the Fosters.

The Fosters are very interesting. They are these twins who are ranchers and Sherwood is kind of the lead.
Henry Sherwood is kind of the lead one. He his his brother Jay is somebody who you know kind of cedes a lot of the decisions to him.
They're both deeply deeply involved with something called the church of Christ.
This becomes important later and I'll tell you why just in terms of connections and things.
But that branch that this comes off of is related to that reformation period and it's when there's a whole reconstruction thing in relation to the religions and people like Thomas Campbell and others come forward.
It's a very interesting thing about Campbell there, but Mormonism comes out of that wave and all the rest of it.
But this group which you know I think in many circles has a great reputation on a humanitarian side and well deserved, tend to have a code kind of like the Mormons where they all tend to work together.
From my own investigations it seems like that's the connecting link in the background, which is if I'm going to hire somebody to do a particular thing and I'm part of this Christian church environment, it's going to be somebody from the church.
What you find out when you look at all these pieces and the people around the Fosters is that everyone that they're hiring to do these things is part of the church.

Now when we get to the crash, of course, this Brazzle goes out and he's with an 8-year-old boy who is the son of his neighbor, and the boy does chores on the ranch and things like that.
He's misidentified in the beginning as Mac's son. Mac does have a son that's associated with this crash who comes to a very tragic end.
Actually he has other children who do just fine. But in this particular case, we have another witness who's a child, an 8-year-old boy who sees all of the incredible sprawling display.

Now, you've always wondered about the actual debris field and all the rest of it, but what it basically comes down to from Jesse Marcel's description is that you're looking at something which was close to a mile in length and the diameter of the entire thing was somewhere around 500 ft.
So, it's a huge incredible crash. whatever it was was gigantic and over and over again the sprawling amount of the wreckage becomes the key thing that these witnesses go over and I'll read a couple of those quotes as we get along here tonight.
So whatever it was was major and you know there's a number of researchers after the fact who attributed it, but what we have to understand is that the government attributed it to different things like secret technology Nazi technology and these other things.

I'll get into how that plays into this but basically the government's response as it goes along, as it becomes aware of the situation is to get rid of the story.
But before that happens, one of the standup guys in the middle of all this is Jesse Marcel.
Major Marcel is the top intelligence officer of the only group who in 1947 could drop the atomic bomb.
So we have to understand the level of expertise that he has.

As we go along tonight, this is a key thing about all the witnesses, you know, from the later parts of tonight's story like Vincent and to the earlier part like Marcel, these are top top witnesses, like the best kind of witnesses that you would want.
And what happens is in according to his own testimony, Marcel tells us, well, you know, first of all, you have to understand when they talk about Roswell.

I had to drive out most of the day just to get there, and a lot of it wasn't on roads. So, the thing wasn't even, you know-- where the Foster Ranch was, was pretty far out there.
It's interesting to note Marcel's reputation for integrity and intelligence work.
He'd been a pilot since 1928, so he already had been flying for 20 years.
He was very familiar with all of the things that we used in our modern programs and he had to be, because of the nuclear aspect, the nature of the base where he was. And that he was in charge not only of intelligence but security.
So, think about the number of of things that he was aware of.
It's funny because when you go into his history a little bit, you'll find him teaching Intelligence very early on, all the way up in Pennsylvania.

So, this guy had a seriously heavy background. He wasn't just somebody's puppet officer, he understood what was going on.
I will say this also about his conclusions: he understood immediately the nature of the situation.
But there was a problem because the wreckage itself had strange magical properties. One of those magical properties is it seemed like the metal itself could levitate at times or it also had that capacity which is that it couldn't be burned or torn in anyway.
It also had an incredibly light--you know anyone who studied the story understands the light quality, no thicker than the tin foil in a pack of cigarettes.
So when we think about that, the material itself has, you know, extraordinary exotic properties.
The other thing that's interesting about it, of course, is that just on a human kind of test level, when you grab it and crumple it up, it goes back to normal immediately.
Then to everyone who talked about it, it seems like the metal has this fascination for them because it does all these magical things right before your eyes.

And of course there's a series of beams associated with the wreckage and these have very unusual markings that resemble hieroglyphs.
Now, it's interesting because some of the whistleblowers from the current wave that are coming through that whole Mellon thing are trying to read some of the core pieces of the original story of Roswell.
So, they're saying, "Oh, yeah. You know, when I was in this hanger, I saw this thing with all these hieroglyphs on it."
The hieroglyph story is deep, deep in the deep sense of the entire UFO story because you have other cases like Kexburg where people are like, well the whole thing was surrounded by hieroglyphics.
In Marcel's case, what he sees are these hieroglyphs, and he describes these beams and then these various markings, and they seem to be raised up on this metal, and he described them as purple, but very strange.

To think about this guy flying the kind of jets and different planes that we have for World War II, and then to see this, you know, an incredible shock.
So, he realizes it's a problem.
He gathers up some of that wreckage.
I've got a couple of pictures here of Brazzle and the ranch.
That is Brazzle there doing his regular job tending cattle and sheep.
I mean, you know it's a very basic farm. It doesn't even have electricity.
So we're talking about super basic and you'll find in Roswell that was kind of the the nature of the environment.

This is where Marcel and Brazzle along with another individual who was in civilian clothes and wasn't identified till much later, and another intelligence officer put all the wreckage originally, which is one of these barns inside of Foster Ranch, and they stack it in there, and then he takes a bunch of it.
He's going to bring it to the base, but it's really late now.
He decides, I'm just going to drive home. It's a long, long enough drive, and then I'll go to the base.
So, when he drives home, he shows it to his son, Jesse Marcel Jr., who I communicated with a little bit before he passed away.

He was a an extraordinary guy. He was a physician who served in Iraq, and I think he had the rank of colonel. He always, after he accepted his father's story, remembered the whole thing about his dad coming home with these I-beams and he remembered the entire thing about the wreckage and the strange memory metal and and everything else.
So Roswell has a few moves that a lot of the, you know, kind of crash retrieval stories in the future didn't quite have, which is the number of witnesses who were involved.
It's just extraordinary.

One that is not understood and why it's such a false thing to say is that, oh, the government put the Roswell thing out there as some kind of weird story.
The government never put the story out.
This is the weird thing.
Yes, the press release originally came out of the army.
But he was the PR guy who jumped the gun after he heard the intelligence officers and what they had to say.
So, the entire thing hit the papers and all the rest of it before the intelligence forces and the military, the brass really had a chance to say anything about it.
So as soon as they heard anything about it, they instantly backtracked the story, got rid of it as a weather balloon, and knocked it out from history.

Now, this is not clearly understood. When I hear people talk about it who are trying to examine the case, they're always like, "Oh, Roswell was this thing. It was a PR thing and all."
Look, from 1947 to 1979, there's not one word about Roswell. It doesn't appear in any of the UFO literature in the 50s or the 60s or the 70s.
The only place the idea of it surfaced was in (Dorothy) Kilgallen's work. She knew because she was very tuned in that something had been covered up back there.
And this goes to some of the weirdness and we discussed her in the Marilyn case last week.
But it needs to be kept in mind that Roswell did not exist as a story at all.

So therefore, what kind of a thing is that for the government to do as a PR exercise, as a propaganda thing?
We're going to put the story out that'll only work 32 years later, you know?
So, no, the government covered up the story and it was gone.
The only way it was rediscovered is that after all this time, for Marcel it was weighing heavy, heavy on his conscience.
Marcel becomes so important to the crux of this story as we go along.
That's where we're going next.

Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show. This is Roswell Reignited. And boy, is there a bombshell in the middle of all this, with the JFK UFO file as well.
We'll be taking your questions in the second half tonight.
And like I said, we'll go a couple hours with you. So, we'll be here till about 11."

[B]MUCH MORE after that. Too much to copy here, but for Ufology buffs, that should whet the appetite! []/B]

(Interesting timing that this is coming out at the same time the Fauci/Foster kids coverup is being revealed...
LOTS of disclosure of various kinds seeming to come to the fore now, just as was predicted...)

See:

Posted by onawah (here)
Roswell Reignited II: UFO File Secret Witness/Dr. Joseph Farrell Part Two
DARK JOURNALIST DANIEL LISZT SPECIAL REPORT:NEW EVIDENCE REVEALED!
EXCLUSIVE LIVE PRESENTATION FRIDAY 8PM EST FEATURING Q & A WITH DJ & MISS OLIVIA
06/27/25

"Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Oxford Scholar Dr. Joseph P. Farrell to go deep on the new evidence brought forward in the latest X-Series "Roswell Reignited" episodes. They go deep on Dr. Farrell's own deep research into the mystery of the Roswell UFO Crash."
*FOSTER RANCH
*ALIEN HIEROGLYPHICS
*JFK CONNECTION
*FIREBALL IN THE SKY
*HIDDEN ARTIFACTS

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yejrU6C52nA

Also, from: https://information-machine.blogspot...gnited-ii.html

DARK JOURNALIST DANIEL LISZT EXCLUSIVE PRESENTATION:
ROSWELL REIGNITED II: UFO FILE SECRET WITNESS BOMBSHELL

- FOSTER RANCH
- ALIEN HIEROGLYPHICS
- JFK CONNECTION
- MAJOR JESSE MARCEL
- FIREBALL IN THE SKY
- HIDDEN ARTIFACTS

Exclusive Summary
Key Takeaways
Series Context: Part two of a six-part "Roswell Reignited" series examining new evidence on the 1947 Roswell UFO incident.
Main Argument: Roswell is linked to the JFK assassination through shared figures and cover-up mechanisms.
Secret Witness: Whistleblower Dorothy provides groundbreaking information that could reshape history.
Historical Suppression: Roswell was hidden for 32 years (1947–1979), indicating a deliberate cover-up.
UFO-JFK Connection: Deputy Sheriff Eugene Boone ties Roswell to the JFK assassination.
Boone’s Role: Boone found the rifle in the JFK assassination and later became CEO of the Foster family’s businesses, linked to the Roswell crash site.
Foster Ranch: The UFO crashed on the Foster Ranch, owned by the Foster brothers in Stevensville, Texas.
UFO Abductions: Alleged abductions occurred in children’s homes tied to the Foster family.
CIA Disinformation: Ongoing CIA disinformation campaigns around UFOs, including recent Wall Street Journal articles.
Luna Hearings Critique: Congressional UFO hearings led by Luna lacked subpoena power and significant witnesses.
JFK Hearings Weakness: Luna’s JFK hearings were "lightweight" and failed to challenge official narratives.

Much more at the link: https://information-machine.blogspot...gnited-ii.html

Posted by grapevine (here)
Fauci tests on foster children

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Pmpv0vS8r2I

[onawah]

Fauci Misled Trump on COVID Vaccine Efficacy in 2020

Posted by onawah (here)
The Data Prove It: Fauci Misled Trump on COVID Vaccine Efficacy in 2020
TrialSite News
September 8, 2025
By Ron Brown, Ph.D.
(Podcast at the link. Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here. )



https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250908

"Data from randomized controlled trials prove the COVID-19 vaccines failed to reach clinically significant efficacy against infection with SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, evidence suggests that in 2020, public health officials who failed to fully disclose the very low absolute efficacy of the vaccines misled President Donald Trump about the efficacy of the vaccines.

U.S. President Donald Trump recently demanded the release of data from pharmaceutical companies to “justify the success of their various COVID-19 drugs,” which include the COVID-19 vaccines that his administration delivered to the public in 2020 through Operation Warp Speed.

Unfortunately, data from randomized controlled trials prove the opposite of success — the COVID-19 vaccines failed to reach clinically significant efficacy against infection with the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.

Furthermore, evidence suggests that the President was misled by public health officials who failed to fully disclose the very low absolute efficacy of the vaccines.

Absolute and relative risk reductions
After the launch of Operation Warp Speed, I conducted an independent analysis of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy from data published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

My analysis, which was published in Medicina in February 2021, showed that the absolute risk reductions of the Stage 3 clinical trials for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were clinically insignificant at approximately 1%. Similar findings were verified by other researchers.

In the meantime, the public was told by public health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, that the vaccines were around 95% effective in reducing the risk of a mild to moderate COVID-19 infection. The vaccines were lauded as the most effective tool to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

Observational studies also claimed that COVID-19 antiviral drugs were effective in preventing hospitalizations and deaths.
Nevertheless, evidence of “effectiveness” from these observational studies could not control for biases and confounding factors, nor rise to the gold standard of efficacy experimentally verified through participant randomization in clinical trials.
Many months later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were not effective in stopping the spread of the coronavirus. What went wrong? Clearly, the expectations of high vaccine efficacy did not match my 2021 analysis. Who was right?

The answer is that both the public health officials and I were right, except that we each analyzed and reported different findings from the trial data. While I reported the vaccines’ absolute risk reductions, Fauci and public health officials reported the vaccines’ relative risk reductions.

Understanding the difference between these two risk measurements is crucial for correctly interpreting the efficacy of the vaccines.

Failure to communicate risks
Without getting into a complicated explanation of statistical differences between absolute and relative risk reductions (which I published here), the important point is that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated in their 2011 publication, “Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User’s Guide,” that BOTH absolute and relative risk reductions should be disclosed to the public.
Obviously, this did not occur during Operation Warp Speed. Indeed, members of the FDA committee that granted emergency use authorization of the vaccines ignored the FDA’s own guidelines for communicating risks to the public and omitted reporting the absolute risk reductions.

Public health officials falsely declared the much higher relative risk reductions as the true risk reductions of the vaccines. Apparently, pressure to support the vaccines as a quick way out of the COVID-19 pandemic promoted public health policy over valid and reliable scientific data.

Had the public been aware of the low clinical efficacy of the vaccines in absolute terms, the expectations of the vaccines to stop the spread of the coronavirus would not have been overstated, and the public, including the Trump administration, would not have been misled.

After publishing my findings on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, I later analyzed data from trials of COVID-19 antivirals and found similar problems of unreported low absolute risk reductions associated with most of these drugs: “Absolute Risk Reductions in COVID-19 Antiviral Medication Clinical Trials.” "

Originally published by TrialSite News.
Ron Brown, Ph.D.’s research synthesizes novel theories and insights from the latest research findings on the causes and prevention of disease.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
TrialSite News is the only digital media dedicated 100% to transparent and open coverage of medical research and developments from around the globe.

[ExomatrixTV]

source


Test ANY Big A.I. Advanced Cognitive Reasoning Skills to analyze this:

Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super-spreader.” You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” You just believed it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Just the one shot.” You just went ahead and got it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “We meant two shots to get your life back.” You just went ahead and got it…again.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” You just got back in line for more of it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now.

Oh, but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong, and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it. 🥴 👍

Sometimes (or is it more "mostly") ... the use of the term: "lacking evidence" is a way to sell the idea that the gatekeepers will decide what is "evidence" or not, thus you have to wait for THEM to be more open & transparent about their "consensus reality" assumptions. (short, medium size reply back please).

Big chance you COULD make a list of examples, but part of that list might not show up because they BURIED, shadowbanned, delisted, censored, banned, falsely accused, systematic misrepresented a LARGE CHUNK of the non-NPC types ±30% of the LLMs you use!

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• BUSTED! Fauci Caught DELETING Emails:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q0vMNrzCXUE

[ExomatrixTV]

• Fauci Reveals They’ve Planned ANOTHER PANDEMIC!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SAu0mseSRAo

During a recent episode of PBS’s Frontline, Dr. Anthony Fauci predicted that another pandemic is inevitable and that society must remain prepared. Jimmy criticizes Fauci’s past handling of the COVID-19 response, in particular the former NAIAD head’s dishonesty on issues like mask use, vaccine efficacy, and the origins of the virus. He and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s claims about gain-of-function research and allegations that U.S. officials funded dangerous viral experiments overseas.