Vaccine Crimes

[onawah]

American Academy of Pediatrics Wants to Shut Down Religious Vaccine Exemptions
by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
July 28, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250728

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"The American Academy of Pediatrics today said religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions are “problematic” and should be prohibited for children attending daycare and school in the U.S. Critics said maintaining exemptions is essential in preserving parental choice, medical ethics and informed consent.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) today called for an end to religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions for children attending daycare and school in the U.S.

In an updated policy statement published in Pediatrics, the AAP said universal immunization is necessary to keep children and employees safe. The organization said there is a place for “legitimate” medical exemptions, but nonmedical exemptions are “problematic.”

“We recommend that vaccination is required for participation in certain public activities, such as school and daycare, and if you choose not to vaccinate, you’re essentially choosing to exclude yourself from those settings,” lead author Dr. Jesse Hackell told MedPage Today.

He added:

“We recognize that excluding a child from public education does have problems, and yet, we reach the conclusion that, on balance, assuring the safety of the school and daycare environment outweighs that risk because there are other educational opportunities available.”

According to the AAP statement, all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico require proof of immunization to attend daycare and school, and all of them grant medical exemptions. However, 45 of those also have religious exemptions, and 15 allow personal belief, philosophical or conscientious objection exemptions.

Only California, Connecticut, Maine, New York and West Virginia don’t allow nonmedical exemptions. Massachusetts is debating a law that would eliminate religious exemptions there.

The AAP statement said reasons for granting medical exemptions can vary, but typically require a demonstrated allergy to a vaccine component, previous serious adverse reaction to a vaccine or its components, or serious underlying immunosuppression.

Some states, including New York, have been tightening their medical exemption requirements in recent years.

Some state medical boards, including in California, have sanctioned or targeted the medical licenses of doctors who write medical exemptions.

“Medically indicated exemptions, when granted appropriately, typically do not have a significant impact on overall community vaccination coverage,” the statement’s authors wrote, but allowing other types of exemptions does, and immunization rates have been dropping in recent years.

Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for Children’s Health Defense, told The Defender that religious freedom is a “hot-button” issue nationwide.

She said:

“The AAP’s statement calling for an end to religious exemptions to immunization ignores constitutionally protected rights regarding religious freedom and potentially is in violation of other laws as well. AAP blatantly suggests that schools discriminate against families with faith-based reasons to not take some or all vaccines.

“To claim otherwise is to play word games — just as AAP suggests that families are not forced to take vaccines that conflict with their religious beliefs but instead that families simply must choose, in those instances, between attending school and staying true to their religious values.”

Dr. Michelle Perro, author of “What’s Making Our Children Sick?: How Industrial Food Is Causing an Epidemic of Chronic Illness, and What Parents (and Doctors) Can Do About It,” criticized the move by the AAP.

“As a pediatrician committed to informed consent and patient rights based on non-biased science, I strongly support the continued access to medical, religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions,” she said.

Perro said many vaccines are produced using cell lines originally derived from aborted fetal tissue. This poses a moral and ethical conflict for some families.

She added:

“In addition, vaccines contain adjuvants and excipients such as aluminum salts, polysorbate 80 and formaldehyde that create neurotoxicity and immune dysregulation in some children. Compounding these issues is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program [VICP], which grants vaccine manufacturers legal immunity, leaving families with no recourse when vaccine injuries occur.

“In a system that removes liability from Pharma while simultaneously mandating their products, preserving exemptions is essential to protect not only parental choice, medical ethics, and the fundamental right to informed consent, but protecting the health of our children.”

In an X post today, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized the VICP and vowed to fix it.

“The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,” Kennedy said. “I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.”

‘Fundamental right’ of parents addressed in Supreme Court ruling this year

Legally requiring immunization is key to high immunization rates, the authors said, highlighting court rulings from 1905, 1922 and 1944 as “legal justification” for their stance.

Mack Rosenberg said:

“AAP is relying on old case law to support its argument, and that case law is being challenged and questioned, and new case law upholding First Amendment religious freedom and also parental rights in a variety of contexts has recently been issued.”

New York civil rights attorney Sujata Gibson, who has represented numerous plaintiffs challenging denials of their vaccine exemptions, said the AAP’s argument disregarded the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2025 ruling in the Mahmoud v. Taylor case.

Gibson said:

“The Court reaffirmed that parents have a fundamental right to raise their children according to their religious beliefs, and any government policy infringing on this right faces strict scrutiny — the highest legal standard. Blanket bans on religious exemptions, as the AAP proposes, fail this test. …

“Forcing families to choose between their faith and their children’s education is unnecessary. Forty-five states already balance public health with religious accommodations, proving it’s possible to protect both. States can no longer rely on vague claims of ‘public health’ to justify mandatory medical interventions. Under strict scrutiny, they must provide concrete evidence — something the AAP’s proposal lacks.

“The Supreme Court’s message is clear: a child’s access to public education cannot be conditioned on a family violating their deeply held religious convictions.”

Public support for religious exemptions is growing

A survey conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, published in January, found public support for religious exemptions from school vaccine requirements doubled, from 20% in 2019 to 39% in 2025.

The survey also showed that only 52% of U.S. adults support having their state require vaccination as a condition of school attendance.

The study authors said school-entry vaccination rates have fallen, while exemptions have gone up. They reported that states with nonmedical vaccine exemptions have had “steady increases,” although that number only reached 3% in the 2022-2023 school year.

“The ease of requirements to obtain nonmedical exemptions can have a significant impact on the rate of exemptions and immunizations,” the authors said.

In its statement, the AAP appeared to question the legitimacy of people’s religious beliefs. It said no major world religious traditions “include scriptural or doctrinal guidelines that preclude adherents from being vaccinated.”

The organization noted that some people develop beliefs drawn from independent religious traditions or diverse denominational perspectives within major religions. Those perspectives are “nonetheless, thought of as ‘religious’ commitments by those who hold them,” but they are too complicated for effective interpretation, the AAP said.

While legislatures are “reticent” to interfere with the free exercise of religion, allowing for exemptions based on such beliefs can substantially affect public health, the organization said.‘AAP and many of its members benefit from high vaccine uptake’

The AAP is a professional organization representing 67,000 pediatricians in the U.S. However, it is also a lobbying organization that has spent between $748,000 and $1,180,000 annually advocating for its members over the previous six years, according to the government website Open Secrets.

The organization’s funding for that work comes, in part, from annual contributions from corporate sponsors, including vaccine manufacturers Moderna, Merck, Sanofi, Abbott Laboratories, GSK and CSL Seqirus.

In today’s statement, the AAP said none of the authors have relevant financial conflicts of interest to disclose and that any conflicts “have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors.”

However, the government Open Payments database shows that lead author Hackell has taken money from Merck, Pfizer, Seqirus and GSK since 2018. Author Dr. Lisa M. Kafer has received payments from the same companies, as well as others. Most other authors are university researchers and are not listed in the database.

The thousands of dollars worth of payments to the authors indicate a relationship between the Big Pharma companies that make the vaccines and the AAP members working to make sure vaccine exemptions are scaled back.

“AAP and many of its members benefit from high vaccine uptake, and this conflict of interest should not be ignored,” said Mack Rosenberg."

Related articles in The Defender

Public Support for Religious Exemptions Nearly Doubled Over Past 6 Years
Hawaii, Religious Exemptions and Measles: Will the Playbook Work Again?
New York’s Attack on Medical Exemptions Gives School Officials Power to Override Doctors on Vaccines

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender. She wrote and taught about capitalism and politics for 10 years in the writing program at Duke University. She holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master's from the University of Texas at Austin.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/CherylGrainger4/status...45668018319569

Cheryl Grainger 😊
@CherylGrainger4
·
8h
What is happening in Japan?

STATE OF EMERGENCY: JAPAN ACCUSES GATES OF CHILD VAX GENOCIDE

Japan is on fire. A medical rebellion is erupting. Tokyo just declared a national emergency after an explosion of child deaths — all traced to mRNA injections. Pediatric wards are overloaded. Autopsy rooms are flooded. And Japan’s top scientists just detonated the global narrative.

Their target: Bill Gates.

Not theories. Not rumors. This time it’s official. Respected immunologists, geneticists, and forensic pathologists have stepped forward — accusing Gates and his pharmaceutical empire of deploying Trojan Horse injections under the false banner of “vaccination.”

“This is not a vaccine. It’s bio-code warfare,” said Dr. Kenji Yamamoto, former NIH adviser.

Behind the scenes, leaked biotech memos linked to Gates-funded labs reveal:

– Synthetic RNA designed to disrupt hormonal development
– Self-replicating code that does NOT degrade
– Nanotech agents able to bypass the blood-brain barrier

This is not theory. This is classified forensic evidence.

The Japanese scientific community is sounding the alarm, exposing what they claim is a deliberate depopulation program camouflaged as public health. They’re now calling it what it truly is: mass medical sabotage.

And the children are the evidence.

Autopsy reports are damning:

– Swollen, inflamed cardiac tissue
– Blood clots forming in micro-vessels
– Collapsing neural structures
– Undeniable traces of synthetic polymers in the brain

One examiner raged: “These aren’t side effects. These are payloads. This is chemical warfare disguised as care.”

Japan broke the silence. Who’s next?

Gates. WHO. Pfizer. The Deep State cartel that pushed this poison knew EXACTLY what they were doing. And now, the cracks in the dam are unstoppable. Japan’s rebellion is only the beginning.

This isn't medicine. It’s warfare.
This isn’t healthcare. It’s genocide.
And those who approved it must face Nuremberg-style justice.

You were warned. Now it’s war.
The children’s blood cries out.
Tick. Tock
#Savethechildren

[mountain_jim]

no idea how accurate this report is.... not familiar with this 'news' provider

[onawah]

Children in America 80 Percent More Likely to Die Than Children in Other Industrialized Countries
by Natasha Hobley
August 4, 2025
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/...zed-countries/

"The United States is confronting a growing pediatric health crisis, with mounting evidence pointing to a decline in children’s overall health and wellbeing.
A recent study revealed that children in the U.S. are dying at significantly higher rates than their peers in other high-income nations, underscoring the severity of the issue.1 2
The cross-sectional study was published last month in the Journal of the American Medical Association and found that from 2007 to 2023, U.S. children were 80 percent more likely to die than their peers in other high-income countries.
The sources covered at least a decade of data, and the researchers analyzed hundreds of millions of health records from five nationally representative surveys and electronic health records.
Co-author of the children health study Chris Forrest, MD, PhD said that what is particularly frustrating is that the majority of the health problems and deaths occurring among children living in the U.S. are avoidable.
Dr. Forrest also said the results were applicable to the total pediatric population and were not dependent upon socioeconomic status.1 3
For infants, the study cites premature birth, sudden infant death syndrome, and congenital anomalies as drivers of mortality.
For children ages one to 19, causes of death were largely due to firearms, vehicle accidents, substance abuse, and homicide.3

Chronic Poor Health Conditions Found 15 to 20 Times Higher than in 2011

But the authors largely highlight chronic poor health conditions driving an alarming decline in health and increase in mortality.
Forrest, a professor of pediatrics at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, stated that chronic conditions are a newer phenomenon that he hardly saw when he first began taking care of children in the 1990s.
The study found that today, nearly half of children are getting medical care for chronic health conditions, and that a child in 2023 was 15 to 20 times more likely to have a chronic condition than a child in 2011.3
“I think we all should be disturbed by this,” Forrest said. “Kids in this country are really suffering.”1

Asthma was the only chronic condition for which rates improved in the studied timeframe.
Depression, anxiety, autism, behavioral conditions, developmental delays, speech disorders, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders all increased.
Physical conditions such as obesity, sleeping problems, and early menstruation also increased.1 3

U.S. Ranks Lowest in Children’s Health and Wellbeing

The findings are consistent with prior research findings.
A 2024 report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine found that despite medical advances, the U.S. currently ranks at the bottom among wealthy nations when it comes to the mental well-being, physical health, and academic and social skills of children.2
Chronic conditions were also the focus of a recent report from the federal government’s Make America Health Again Commission, which referenced today’s children as “the sickest generation in American history.”
The report cites processed foods, environmental chemical exposures, technology use, and overprescribing of medication as the contributing factors.1

Study Author Encourages Evaluating Entire ‘Ecosystem” of U.S. Children

But Forrest states that the findings should be a wake-up call that our country is failing kids and encourages not solely examining food, chemicals, or technology—but the entire ecosystem that our children are growing up in.
“Many of these trends started back in the 1970s, so we’re talking about a long-term decline in children’s health,” Forrest said in an interview with the publication Science. “That speaks to very deep-seated issues in our society about how we value children’s health, how we value the places where kids are growing up, and how we take care of kids.”2 "

References:
1 Christensen J. US children are much more likely to die than kids in similar countries, studReferences:
1 Christensen J. US children are much more likely to die than kids in similar countries, study finds. CNN July 7, 2025.
2 Ahmed N. Comprehensive look at U.S. children’s health finds ‘steady decline’. Science July 7, 2025.
3 Forrest C. Trends in US children’s mortality, chronic conditions, obesity, functional status, and symptoms. JAMA July 7, 2025.

[onawah]

‘Biggest Losers Are America’s Children’: AAP Prioritizes Medical Control Over Parental Choice
by Dr. David Bell, Brownstone Institute
August 5, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6s#btn-share-1

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)


"The American Academy of Pediatrics paved the way for rising rates of chronic illness in U.S. children for decades. The agency’s Top 10 priorities list promotes mandated medicalization but ignores diet and physical activity.

American healthcare is currently providing us with an excellent lesson in what capitalism looks like in the absence of a moral framework. The biggest losers are America’s children.

The union profiting from childhood sickness
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the major professional association of North American pediatricians, has overseen the rising rates of chronic illness and medication of American children over recent decades.

With 67,000 members in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, AAP distinguished itself during COVID-19 for its strident insistence that children’s faces should be covered and they should be injected with modified RNA vaccines, despite knowing from early 2020 that severe COVID-19 was very rare in healthy children.

Funded by sources including Moderna, Merck, Sanofi, GSK, Eli Lilly and other pharmaceutical companies, the AAP’s members are the cornerstone of the rapidly increasing pediatric pharma market in North America — by far greater than any other region.

As a professional organization dedicated to ensuring income for its members, the AAP is like any similar professional association or union and acts in this manner.

The loss of trust in the medical profession since 2020 is fortunately removing the misconception that AAP-like medical societies were primarily altruistic, dedicated to the welfare of others rather than their members.

The recent publication of AAP priorities, developed by its membership, should reinforce this loss of trust and so, despite its unusual callousness of approach, serve ultimately to strengthen public health by exposing more clearly the motivations of those profiting from rising illness.

Setting priorities to ensure long-term profit
The AAP’s first stated priority is to remove parents from any authority when it comes to decisions on whether to inject their children with various substances produced commercially by its sponsors.

While this should be ridiculous, it has some chance of succeeding as the ultimate beneficiaries, apart from pediatricians, are the same pharmaceutical manufacturers who heavily sponsor the election campaigns of most members of the U.S. Congress.

Of relevance, promoting or abetting chronic disease in children ensures almost certain chronic disease through adulthood. The AAP is therefore helping to set up lifelong pharmaceutical consumers.

Pharma companies are purely for-profit entities, and this is exactly what their CEOs and executives are charged by their shareholders with promoting. The AAP is simply acting as a very willing enabler.

The AAP considers that bodily autonomy is subservient to state-imposed requirements and that the post-World War II human rights of non-coercion and informed consent are subservient to the opinion of someone receiving money to perform an injection.

Its approach coincides with the pre-War technocracy movement or medical fascism (in which a declared “expert” decides on imposing healthcare measures rather than the patient themselves choosing it).

However, before discussing bodily autonomy and coerced medicine further, it is worth commenting on the priority list of the AAP overall, as it is fascinating, coming from a group that insists publicly on prioritizing the health of children.

Firstly, what is not there. Among the 10 priorities of the AAP of which the elimination of parental rights or religious or cultural exemptions over vaccination of children is the highest, there is not a single mention of what are perhaps the three most prominent issues facing children today, and widely discussed publicly; increasing obesity and the epidemic of autism that the CDC heralds as of extraordinary proportions.

While the AAP notes this problem elsewhere, it concentrates on identification and management rather than cause identification. Nowhere among its 10 priorities is there any expression of interest in identifying and addressing the causes of rising chronic illness.

The closest is a mention of lower costs for childhood insulin injections. The AAP’s priority list ignores diet and reducing levels of physical activity while actively promoting medicalization, seemingly oblivious to the quite catastrophic reduction in health status of the very populations they claim to be serving.

Unsurprisingly, for a purely marketing organization, but inconsistent with a science-based healthcare body, the priorities include nothing regarding very obvious concerns of the impact of over 70 vaccinations, with their associated adjuvants and preservatives, now given to children by 10 years of age. This number has grown from just a few 40 years ago in association with the deterioration in child health outcomes.

The only interest expressed in vaccines is to remove choice from those concerned about such things and force compliance. For a society of thinking, truth-seeking people, this would be extraordinary.

Parents as an obstacle to return on investment

The justification reported from AAP President Kyle E. Yasuda, for removing any remaining personal choice regarding prophylactic medical treatment (vaccination) is “the measles outbreaks” in North America in recent years.

Dr. Jesse Hackell, chair of the AAP’s Committee on Pediatric Workforce, notes that they were associated with the deaths of two children, the first in “many years.”

The AAP simply states, regarding safety, that vaccines are “safe,” a stupid claim in medicine and biology, in that adverse events do occur to injected organic substances and metal salts, and they vary from person to person (if rare events occur, then ‘safe’ is a relative term).

Associations with recent DTP injection and sudden infant death are, for example, fairly well documented.

Regarding measles, it is likely that many AAP members mean well, but are genuinely misinformed regarding the impact of mass vaccination. In wealthy countries, including the U.S., nearly all measles mortality ceased before mass vaccination was commenced.

This is not controversial — it was once stressed in medical school and is well established in national health statistics. An underlying improvement in nutrition, particularly in micronutrient deficiencies, was a likely reason.

Mass vaccination then greatly reduced the circulation of the measles virus, but could have only a limited impact on overall mortality.

Therefore, weighing the costs of vaccination (adverse events) against a very low likelihood of averting early death or disability is a real issue, and to ignore it by just reiterating “safe and effective” is ignorant and foolish.

Measles vaccination is good at stopping transmission because it is very effective at preventing infections from being established. This efficacy is significant to the argument that having many vaccinated is a public good. Nearly all vaccinated people will be protected and at no risk from the unvaccinated.

Thus, mass measles vaccination really only makes sense if it is accepted that people should not have freedom to choose over their own bodies and healthcare, or that of their children.

The very low measles mortality, far lower than drowning even before mass vaccination commenced in the U.S., effectively removed an argument for overriding parental rights. Unless, of course, we are also going to ban children from swimming or walking near rivers or on a beach.

Lastly, regarding concerns over vaccination, many parents are uncomfortable with the role of cells harvested from induced aborted fetuses, often still alive at the time of harvesting. Again, many AAP members may believe the rhetoric that this is untrue, but nonetheless it is factual.

It is how we derive cell cultures to develop many vaccines, so the DNA of these dead unborn humans can still contaminate the injection. The AAP, as an institution, officially holds that cultural and religious concerns arising from this should be overridden.

So, in the end, the AAP’s argument seems to come down to one of two possible drivers.

Either (1) they have an ideological belief that they should simply be the authority or decision-makers on children’s healthcare rather than parents (a medical-fascist approach), or (2) they see their role as promoting an extremely lucrative market for their sponsors, from which they also directly benefit, and setting children up for an entire lifetime of chronic illness and pharmaceutical consumption. It is challenging to decide which is less noble.

A third possibility is also possible. Most AAP members are simply going with the flow and have not actually stopped to think through the implications of their union’s policies.

However, the motivation for willfully ignoring rational thought probably does come down to a mixture of money and ego, which goes back to the two potential drivers mentioned above.

Medical fascism should have no future

The AAP will almost certainly continue its path of child polypharmacy, blind adherence to protocols based on the products of their sponsors and denigration and exclusion of the opinions of parents who recognize the stark reality of deteriorating health in North American children. Parents reading the AAP’s list of priorities would be foolhardy to then entrust their children to such care.

Providing that politicians retain integrity and respect freedoms that most assumed were guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution and through basic human rights norms, the AAP will fail in its endeavors and become increasingly irrelevant to public discourse. If they get their way, we will return further toward an approach we thought we had fought wars to overcome.

Fundamental rights of each human to make their own way in life, and protect and oversee their children, underpin any decent societal model. In fascist societies, such decisions are removed and taken into the hands of experts and authoritarian institutions.

The people must simply comply as slaves. Medical professions and their academies have a long history of supporting such approaches, and the AAP seems increasingly determined to replicate that path. It should receive all the respect that such an indecent approach deserves.

Originally published by Brownstone Institute.

Dr. David Bell is a senior scholar at Brownstone Institute, a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health."

The Brownstone Institute is a nonprofit organization founded May 2021. Its vision is of a society that places the highest value on the voluntary interaction of individuals and groups while minimizing the use of violence and force including that which is exercised by public or private authorities.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1953829526372331996

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
1h
BREAKING: Another COVID “conspiracy theory” just came true.

A Special HHS Adviser confirmed it, and you could see the pain written all over his face.

This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding.

🧵 THREAD

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1953831983311696334

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
1h
Senior HHS Advisor Dr. Steven Hatfill just said mRNA shots induce “BIOCHEMICAL HAVOC.”

He’s likely referring to the new study that found mRNA shots induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease.

Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, they discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering mitochondrial failure, immune reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that can persist for MONTHS to YEARS post-injection.

Differential gene expression analysis compared mRNA-injured patients (cancer, adverse events) to 803 healthy controls — revealing widespread transcriptomic CHAOS.

https://preprints.org/manuscript/202507.2155/v1


https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1953832307246461120

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
1h
Dr. Hatfill said the data had accumulated to the point where large studies could be conducted. He’s right. The two LARGEST COVID-19 “vaccine” safety studies in HISTORY—covering 184 MILLION people—prove mRNA shots are NOT SAFE for human use.

📍 Faksova et al. (n=99M) (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/)

➊ Myocarditis +510% (dose 2)

➋ Brain/Spinal Cord Inflammation +278% (dose 1)

➌ Brain Clots +223% (dose 1)

➍ Guillain-Barré +149% (dose 1)

📍 Karimi et al. (n=85M) (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970839/)

➊ Heart Attack +286% (dose 2)

➋ Stroke +240% (dose 1)

➌ Coronary Artery Disease +244% (dose 2)

➍ Cardiac Arrhythmia +199% (dose 1)

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1953965493204951195

Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra

The Atlanta gunman believed the COVID vaccine had made him sick—and may have set his sights on the CDC because of it.

Police, after speaking with his family, say he either was sick or believed he was, and blamed the vaccine for his condition.

Investigators now suspect this belief was the driving motive behind his targeting of the CDC.


https://x.com/josettecaruso/status/1953966087743177021

josette caruso
@josettecaruso
·
12h
It has been reported that the gunman in the recent Atlanta shooting near the CDC headquarters may have been motivated by a belief that the COVID vaccine had made him sick. This may have led him to target the CDC, according to reports from an independent reporter shared on X.
However, the Atlanta Police Department has not yet officially revealed the suspect's target or motive. The CDC and Emory University campus went into lockdown after an active shooter alert was issued. The suspect was shot by police, and their body was found behind a CVS store on Clifton Road.
It's important to note that the CDC has stated that while the COVID vaccine can cause temporary side effects like swelling, fatigue, and fever, they have only documented four serious but rare side effects. They do not believe the illnesses described by some patients were caused by the vaccine.

cough "bull****"

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status...61088178155716

Concerned Citizen
@BGatesIsaPyscho

“Our Foundation is very involved with The Chinese Vaccine Industry”

“The Manufacturers we work with there are gearing up to use mRNA type approaches”

“It’s great for The World to have lots of Vaccine capacity”

“My Foundation funds vaccines for all the Children of The World”

Bill Gates continues his absolute obsession with injecting the entire planet with experimental mRNA Vaccines.

[onawah]

ICAN Obtains Further Disturbing Details About the Government’s Self-Spreading Vaccine Program
8/11/25
Informed Consent Action Network
https://icandecide.org/press-release...ccine-program/

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

"ICAN has acquired a Department of Defense (DOD) request for proposal related to its self-spreading vaccine program, DARPA INTERCEPT. In addition, Autonomous Therapeutics has published results of a successful test of its self-spreading vaccines in monkeys and is continuing its drive to develop “synthetic immune systems.”

Last year, ICAN made headlines when we uncovered the worrying new threat posed by the U.S. Government’s funding of studies on self-spreading vaccines. ICAN’s attorneys have recently uncovered more information on DARPA’s INTERCEPT Program, which funded research and development of TIPs (therapeutic interfering particles) that would act as “tiny Trojan horses” to carry engineered viruses that can spread from person to person. The INTERCEPT program even planned to develop computer models to predict how TIPs could spread “from an individual cell to an organism to an entire population.”

FOIA records obtained by ICAN reveal the details of a 2016 DOD request for proposal (the first step in the competitive bidding process for federal contracts), stating that the INTERCEPT Program aimed to develop a biological system for replicating “human-like conditions” for the study of “long-term evolutionary dynamics of fast mutating pathogens, diseases and emerging pandemics of interest to DOD.” This contract was eventually awarded to Autonomous Therapeutics, Inc.

ICAN previously reported on Ariel Weinberger and Leor Weinberger, the co-founders of Autonomous Therapeutics. Now, it appears their potentially dangerous technology is gaining momentum. Leor Weinberger published a study that tested TIPs engineered for HIV on rhesus monkeys, and he is moving forward with plans to inject TIPs into terminally ill humans with HIV. This raises grave health and ethical concerns because TIPs would become a permanent part of the patients’ DNA—and could possibly spread to people outside the clinical trial.

ICAN’s legal team continues to work to ensure these technologies will not be used to infect anyone without their consent. ICAN has sued the government for the federal grants and contracts funding Autonomous Therapeutics and has sent a FOIA request for all INTERCEPT program reports. We will keep you posted as we learn more about this concerning “technology.” "

[onawah]

Return of Tyranny: The AAP and ACLU Want to Strip Your Rights as a Parent
From: noreply@info.icandecide.org
Aug 16, 2025

(More from ICAN --Informed Consent Action Network. An appeal for donations is included which is not ordinarily appropriate for posting here, but there is a good update of important info as well about religious exemptions.)

Return of Tyranny: The AAP and ACLU Want to Strip Your Rights as a Parent

Will You Let Them? Or Will You Stand With Us to Fight Back?

What would you do if your child were denied a basic education… simply because you refused to violate your conscience?

That’s not a hypothetical. It’s happening right now.

Four states currently provide no religious exemption for students and, now, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) just released a statement calling for the elimination of all religious and personal exemptions to school vaccine mandates — in every state, for every child.

ICAN Summer of Justice Legal Fund Match
Meanwhile, the ACLU — an organization once devoted to defending individual freedom — brought suit to prevent families of faith from claiming religious exemptions.

It openly demands the power to control your child’s body.

To violate your beliefs.

And to remove you — the parent — from the decision-making process altogether.

This is tyranny, plain and simple.

And the only thing standing between your family and force... is ICAN.

Just weeks ago, our legal team — led by constitutional attorney Aaron Siri — won a major legal victory in West Virginia. A judge issued a preliminary injunction protecting four brave students, allowing them to attend public school without forced vaccinations.

This is no small thing.

This case is cracking that wall of oppression wide open.

But we didn’t win by accident. This victory was years in the making — and fully funded by people like you.

We've been building this legal battle since 2016.
We’ve fought back in Mississippi, New York, California, and now West Virginia.
Our team has over 90 active lawsuits defending freedom of choice, medical liberty, transparency, and religious conscience.
And we’re not stopping.

But neither is the opposition. The AAP and ACLU are now openly targeting religious beliefs and informed consent.

They see that we’re winning — and they want to shut us down.

That’s why your ongoing sustaining support is critical.

That’s why I’m asking you to make your most matching gift today. Not someday.

Not after we’ve lost. But now — while we still have the chance to turn the tide.

RIGHT NOW,
YOUR DONATION WILL BE DOUBLED!
THAT MEANS

$50 = $100

$100 = $200
$250 = $500
$500 = $1,000

Each gift helps us reach families under threat before it’s too late–from funding depositions to restoring exemptions in other states to calling witnesses!

Will you stand with us?

Will you stand for faith, family, and freedom?

Give now and see the power of your gift multiplied by 100%.

Thank you for reading my letter. Please let me hear from you quickly!

Be Brave!
Del Bigtree, CEO and Founder
Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)

Posted by onawah (here)
ICAN Obtains Further Disturbing Details About the Government’s Self-Spreading Vaccine Program
8/11/25
Informed Consent Action Network
https://icandecide.org/press-release...ccine-program/

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

"ICAN has acquired a Department of Defense (DOD) request for proposal related to its self-spreading vaccine program, DARPA INTERCEPT. In addition, Autonomous Therapeutics has published results of a successful test of its self-spreading vaccines in monkeys and is continuing its drive to develop “synthetic immune systems.”

Last year, ICAN made headlines when we uncovered the worrying new threat posed by the U.S. Government’s funding of studies on self-spreading vaccines. ICAN’s attorneys have recently uncovered more information on DARPA’s INTERCEPT Program, which funded research and development of TIPs (therapeutic interfering particles) that would act as “tiny Trojan horses” to carry engineered viruses that can spread from person to person. The INTERCEPT program even planned to develop computer models to predict how TIPs could spread “from an individual cell to an organism to an entire population.”

FOIA records obtained by ICAN reveal the details of a 2016 DOD request for proposal (the first step in the competitive bidding process for federal contracts), stating that the INTERCEPT Program aimed to develop a biological system for replicating “human-like conditions” for the study of “long-term evolutionary dynamics of fast mutating pathogens, diseases and emerging pandemics of interest to DOD.” This contract was eventually awarded to Autonomous Therapeutics, Inc.

ICAN previously reported on Ariel Weinberger and Leor Weinberger, the co-founders of Autonomous Therapeutics. Now, it appears their potentially dangerous technology is gaining momentum. Leor Weinberger published a study that tested TIPs engineered for HIV on rhesus monkeys, and he is moving forward with plans to inject TIPs into terminally ill humans with HIV. This raises grave health and ethical concerns because TIPs would become a permanent part of the patients’ DNA—and could possibly spread to people outside the clinical trial.

ICAN’s legal team continues to work to ensure these technologies will not be used to infect anyone without their consent. ICAN has sued the government for the federal grants and contracts funding Autonomous Therapeutics and has sent a FOIA request for all INTERCEPT program reports. We will keep you posted as we learn more about this concerning “technology.” "

[onawah]

DOD Forcing Flu Shots on Service Members Despite Negative Effectiveness
by Jeremy R. Hammond
Aug 14, 2025
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2025/...effectiveness/

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"The Defense Department penalizes service members who decline flu shots despite the evidence they can increase the risk of infection.Members of the US armed forces who decline receipt of the influenza vaccine, including because of religious convictions, are facing punitive actions by the Department of Defense, reports J.M. Phelps in The Gateway Pundit.

An anonymous Marine officer and Air Force Major Brennan Schilperoort spoke to Phelps about their experiences of being separated from service despite having a “Constitutionally protected religious rights to substantiate their objection” and both having shown natural immunity.

Phelps also reached out to me for comment because of my own extensive research into flu shots, culminating in a four-part series of detailed articles published in 2018 and 2019 that I’ve collectively titled “The Flu Shot Fraud: Everything you ever wanted to know about the influenza vaccine but the CDC didn’t tell you.”

Dr. Joseph Mercola, founder of the leading natural health website Mercola.com, called my series “well worth reading”, and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., now Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), described it a “must-read series on the corporate and government corruption behind the flu vaccine”.

I am quoted in the Gateway Pundit article saying,

The coerced vaccination of military service members is yet another unfortunate example of how the government systematically violates individuals’ right to informed consent. This policy exists despite scientific evidence indicating that getting an annual flu shot can actually increase the risk of influenza illness.

The most recent example of that I’m aware of, cited in the article, was a study by researchers from the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio published in April at medRxiv, a server for preprint studies, which have not yet undergone peer review.

The study examined the effectiveness of flu shots during the 2024–2025 flu season among 53,402 clinic employees and found that, at first, the vaccinated group had a similar cumulative incidence of influenza as those who did not.

In other words, there was no evidence of protection.

Moreover, as time went on, “the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.”

While the authors don’t comment on why that might be, the most likely explanation is simply that natural immunity is an opportunity cost of vaccination.

By getting the flu shot, one foregoes the opportunity to develop the more robust and durable immunity conferred by infection.

There is also the immunological phenomenon of “original antigenic sin”, whereby the initial priming of the immune system by vaccination prejudices the immune response in subsequent exposures to mutated variants to be suboptimal relative to natural immunity.

After adjusting for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the study found that the risk of influenza infection was significantly higher among the vaccinated, with a vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%.

That is, the flu shot had negative effectiveness, meaning that vaccinated people were significantly more likely to get an influenza infection.

There are also “non-specific effects” to consider, which is the term used in the literature to describe beneficial or detrimental effects of vaccination other than those intended.

As I told The Gateway Pundit,

Just because a vaccine is effective at reducing the risk of illness from the target pathogen does not mean that it reduces the overall risk of illness. Vaccinations can detrimentally affect the immune system in ways that make people more vulnerable to other diseases.

I cited the example of a study in Clinical Infectious Diseases in 2012 finding no significant benefit of influenza vaccines in children, while children who got the flu shot had an increased risk of non-influenza infections.

Numerous other studies showing how getting an annual influenza vaccine can actually increase your risk of infection and illness are cited in part three of my flu shot series.

In his article, Phelps also references a 2020 letter from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, in which Kennedy cited a 2010 systematic review and meta-analysis in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

I highlighted that review in part one of my series in response to a New York Times article that cited it to support the claim that influenza vaccines confer “a big payoff in public health.”

In fact, the review found that flu shots are highly ineffective and questioned the recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for universal influenza vaccination among healthy adults.

The review found that, in a typical year, 100 people need to receive a flu shot for just one of them to avoid influenza symptoms. The shot had “no effect” on hospitalization, and there was “no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications.”

As the authors noted, that means that the fundamental assumptions underlying the CDC’s policy are unsupported by scientific evidence.

In fact, far from supporting the claim for which it was cited by the New York Times, the review authors went so far in their criticism of the CDC as to accuse the agency of deliberately misrepresenting the science to support its policy.

“The CDC authors clearly do not weight interpretation by quality of the evidence,” they observed, “but quote anything that supports their theory.”

The review’s conclusion, far from being that flu shots confer a big public health benefit, was that the data “seem to discourage the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”

It would be bad enough if service members were being coerced into getting flu shots by the Department of Defense even if they were highly effective. The fact that this coercion persists despite the evidence showing not only that they are highly ineffective but that they can even increase your risk of influenza and influenza-like illnesses is absolutely criminal.

To learn more, here is further reading:

“Defense Department Continues Ignoring Harms to Readiness by Pushing Flu Shots Contrary to Large Body of Evidence” by J.M. Phelps in The Gateway Pundit

“Should You Get the Flu Shot Every Year? Don’t Ask the New York Times.” — part one of my major series on influenza vaccines, in which I expose how the mainstream media brazenly lie about the science

“How the CDC Uses Fear and Deception to Sell More Flu Vaccines” — part two, in which I expose how the CDC serves the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry, not public health, including how its false claims about the flu shot’s effect on elderly mortality were thoroughly debunked

“How You’re Being Lied to about the Risks of Getting a Flu Vaccine Annually” — part three, in which I expose why the claim that flu shots are “safe” is deceptive and review studies showing how they can increase the risk of illness

“The CDC’s Criminal Recommendation for a Flu Shot During Pregnancy” — part four, in which I reveal why the recommendation for pregnant women to get the flu shot is criminally reckless, including how if the manufacturers themselves made the same claims about safety and effectiveness during pregnancy as the CDC, they could be
sued for fraud

For many more articles debunking government and mainstream media misinformation about influenza vaccines, see my collection here:
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/artic...ons/flu-shots/"

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/WallStreetMav/status/1957076691571933575

Just got this text message pushing me to get a Pfizer vax.

I have never received a text like this before. Is this a new scam?

— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) August 17, 2025

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1957821800890462318

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
2h
INSANE: CNN is STILL shilling Covid booster SHOTS for adults.....like it’s 2021.

Is this a joke?

They’re like the last Japanese soldier on Okinawa...they don’t realize the war is over.

It was a scam, but CNN is pushing the jab for their Big Pharma overlords.

Wolf Blitzer: “When should adults start getting the Covid vaccine booster shots, and when should we start getting the flu shots?”

Meg Tirell: “Well, we are waiting on the Covid vaccines for sort of the regulatory go ahead. And there is still some question about who exactly is going to be eligible and able to get a vaccine.”

“But typically, as we head into the fall and Covid levels are rising nationally, there should be an updated Covid vaccine, especially for people over the age of 65.”



https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1957693098688926004

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
11h
John Oliver says failing to fully endorse injecting children with 20 different vaccines by just 18 months old is “really dangerous.”

I wish I were making this up.

[onawah]

Wow, anything for a buck, even if it means the deaths of children.....you would almost think the elites have some kind of depopulation agenda...

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

Leading Pediatrician Group Defies CDC, Tells Parents to Get COVID Shots for Infants, Kids
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
August 19, 2025
childrenshealthdefense.org
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...oA#btn-share-1

"The American Academy of Pediatrics’ new “evidence-based immunization schedule” recommends COVID-19 vaccination for all children between 6 and 23 months of age “to help protect against serious illness.” HHS accused the group of prioritizing “commercial interests” over children’s health."
"The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is recommending COVID-19 shots for infants, young children and children in “high-risk” groups — diverging for the first time in 30 years from the CDC on childhood vaccine recommendations.
The AAP’s new “evidence-based immunization schedule,” published in the AAP Red Book Online, recommends COVID-19 vaccination for all children between 6 and 23 months of age “to help protect against serious illness.” It also recommends a single dose of the COVID-19 vaccine for all children and adolescents 2-18 years old who are in a high-risk group.
The AAP also “recommends the vaccine be available for children ages 2-18 who do not fall into these risk groups, but whose parent or guardian desires them to have the protection of the vaccine.”
The groups’ updated guidelines also include recommendations for annual flu shots for all children starting at 6 months old, and RSV vaccination for several categories of infants up to 19 months of age.
In May, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced changes to the COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for children and pregnant women.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommends “shared clinical decision-making” between parents and providers for healthy children ages 6 months to 17 years.
The agency changed its guidance on COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women from recommended to “no guidance.”
Last month, the AAP and five other medical organizations sued Kennedy and other public health officials and agencies over this new guidance.
Experts: ‘No legitimate scientific evidence’ supports AAP recommendations
A statement issued today by the AAP included remarks from Dr. Sean O’Leary, chair of the group’s Committee on Infectious Diseases, who said the recommendations are based on the latest evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines in kids.
“We extensively reviewed the most recently available data about COVID-19 risks in kids, as well as safety and effectiveness of available COVID-19 vaccines. It’s clear they are very safe for all populations,” O’Leary said.
Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense, disagreed. “Where are the inert placebo-controlled clinical trials? Where is the evidence that children are at risk from COVID? What are the real rates of injury and death from these injections? On these essential questions, the AAP is silent,” Holland said.
Dr. Lawrence B. Palevsky said the term “evidence-based” is used to “lure the public into believing the AAP bases their recommendations on solid, rigorous scientific information. It’s mere word play,” Palevsky, a pediatrician, said. “The AAP has no legitimate scientific evidence to back up their claims.”
Palevsky added:
“No one should be getting the COVID shot. No child. No adult. No living being. It’s not safe. It’s not tested. It doesn’t prevent infection. There is no upside — unless you’re trying to profit from people’s vulnerabilities. There is only downside to taking this shot.”
AAP’s president, Dr. Susan J. Kressly, told ABC News the group’s recommendations are also a response to an “environment of misinformation” about vaccines. O’Leary told The Washington Post that Kennedy has led “a pretty clearly orchestrated strategy to sow distrust in vaccines.”
In a statement provided to The Defender, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard questioned the AAP’s claims:
“The American people deserve confidence that medical recommendations are based solely on science and public health. Instead, the AAP is undermining national immunization policymaking with baseless political attacks. Secretary Kennedy has stood firm in his commitment to science, transparency, and restoring public trust.”
Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, fired back at the AAP’s claim that its recommendations are “evidence-based.”
“There is and can be no evidence on long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines on cancer or fertility because they haven’t been used long enough,” Orient said. “The evidence that AAP needs to show includes all-cause mortality rates in children who do versus those who do not follow their recommendations, as well as rates of allergy, autoimmunity, seizures and neurodevelopment disorders.”
The AAP did not respond to a request by The Defender for comment by press time.
AAP ‘putting commercial interests ahead of public health’
The AAP, which represents 67,000 pediatricians, is the recipient of substantial funding from Big Pharma, including vaccine makers, and the federal government. Holland said this funding structure represents a conflict of interest.
“With its new vaccine recommendations, the AAP shows its true colors — to stand with Big Pharma against children,” Holland said. “The AAP has become nothing more than the depraved long arm of Big Pharma to market to children.”
The CDC’s updated COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children have implications for the availability and cost of the vaccines. According to ABC News, insurance companies and the federal Vaccines for Children Program may choose not to cover the cost of vaccines that the CDC doesn’t recommend.
In the AAP’s statement, Kressly urged insurers to continue covering all the vaccines included in the organization’s updated immunization schedule.
According to HHS, “By bypassing the CDC’s advisory process and freelancing its own recommendations, while smearing those who demand accountability, the AAP is putting commercial interests ahead of public health and politics above America’s children.”
Orient suggested that AAP “disclose all the funding it receives from vaccine makers — and all the incentives and bonuses pediatric practices receive from insurers and others for having ‘fully vaccinated’ patients.”
Profits — not evidence — behind AAP recommendations
Internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton J. Baker said several factors likely led the AAP to issue its new recommendations, “none of which are ‘evidence-based’ nor based on the best interests of children.”
Baker said these factors include a desire to maintain control over pediatric practice, waning relevance in light of new leadership at federal public health agencies and AAP’s business model, which “depends largely on government subsidy … and Big Pharma payoffs.”
“All AAP has left is to double down on past failed recommendations in return for Pharma support,” Baker said.
After the AAP and five other medical groups sued Kennedy and other public health officials and agencies, the CDC booted the groups from the agency’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices workgroups on vaccine policy.
Last month, the AAP called for an end to religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions for children attending daycare and school in the U.S.
Washington Post acknowledges most children at low risk of COVID
According to the Post, the AAP’s new recommendations come amid a decline in COVID-19 vaccine uptake among children.
Citing CDC figures, the Post reported that “3 percent of all eligible children are up-to-date on coronavirus vaccines, as well as 4.5 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months.”
Most children are at low risk from COVID-19, the Post acknowledged.
Experts on all sides of the COVID-19 vaccine debate have questioned whether healthy children need the vaccines at all.
The Associated Press acknowledged the growing concerns about the efficacy and necessity of COVID-19 vaccination for children, reporting that “The idea that healthy older kids may be able to skip COVID-19 boosters has been brewing for some time among public health experts.”
COVID-19 vaccine critics point to proven safety risks for children, including increased rates of autoimmune disease and altered immune system response, myocarditis and pericarditis, and inflammation. Several recent studies have questioned the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for children and teens.
According to a peer-reviewed study published in Pediatric Rheumatology in May, children and adolescents who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine had a 23% higher risk of developing autoimmune disease compared to unvaccinated children.
A study published in the journal Immunity, Inflammation and Disease in April found that young adults who received a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine showed elevated spike protein production a year or more after vaccination — significantly longer than the spike protein was expected to remain in the body.
Children ages 5-11 who received two doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine had heightened levels of a type of antibody suggestive of an altered immune system response one year after vaccination, according to a peer-reviewed study published last year in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. "

Related articles in The Defender
AAP Received Tens of Millions in Federal Funding to Push Vaccines and Combat ‘Misinformation’
AAP, AMA Booted From CDC Vaccine Advisory Working Groups
American Academy of Pediatrics Wants to Shut Down Religious Vaccine Exemptions
RFK Jr. Hit With Lawsuit Over Changes to COVID Vaccine Policies for Kids, Pregnant Women
CDC Updates Childhood Schedule With New COVID Vaccine Recommendation for Kids, But Advice for Pregnant Women Still Unchanged
Leading Pediatrician Group Defies CDC, Tells Parents to Get COVID Shots for Infants, Kids

[onawah]

‘The More Doses You Get, The Sooner You are Likely to Die’: Japanese Data Suggest COVID Vaccines Led to Surge in Excess Deaths
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
August 20, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250820

(Podcast at the link. Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

"People who received COVID-19 vaccines had a significantly higher risk of death in the first year after vaccination compared to the unvaccinated, according to an analysis of a Japanese database of 18 million people. The data, not yet published in a peer-reviewed journal, is impressive in size, but requires further analysis, said CHD Senior Research Scientist Karl Jablonowski.

[B]Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., examined the data on his YouTube show this week. The data were originally released in June as part of a roundtable discussion, which was streamed online and led by Yasufumi Murakami, Ph.D., vice director of the Research Center for RNA Science at the Tokyo University of Science.

“The more doses you get, the sooner you are likely to die, within a shorter period,” Murakami said during the roundtable.

In his analysis, Campbell said deaths in the vaccinated group were up to four-and-a-half times higher than in the unvaccinated group. The data also showed that deaths among the vaccinated peaked between 90-120 days after vaccination, with the peak occurring sooner as the number of doses increased.

“If someone had had three doses, the peak might be after about … 120 days,” Campbell said. “But if they had four or five doses, the peak in deaths would be earlier, maybe about 90 days.”

The risk of death in vaccinated people remained elevated for the first year following vaccination, “significantly so for the first 240 days,” whereas for unvaccinated people, “no peak forms, which is the expected” outcome, Campbell said.

Japanese data indicate causal link between vaccinations, excess deaths

In his presentation, Murakami said the data show a clear causal link between vaccinations and excess deaths. Campbell agreed, noting that the excess deaths were “probably due to the vaccine’s influence, with adverse reactions occurring leading to death.”

“If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak. That’s the point,” Campbell said.

According to immunologist and biochemist Jessica Rose, Ph.D., the spike protein in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, is likely a contributing factor to the higher death rate among the vaccinated.

She said:

“The spike protein is highly inflammatory and induces powerful immune reactions against affected cells. Cells transfected and producing spike protein are targeted for destruction, and since the lipid nanoparticles assure any cell can be a spike-producer, including heart cells, it explains much of cardiac-associated deaths.”

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense, agreed.

“The spike protein is a toxic component of SARS-CoV-2, and unanimously the antigen of choice for all mRNA vaccines,” he said. “The mRNA technology has many components that may be a driving force for increases in excess deaths.”

According to Rose, lipid nanoparticles, which help deliver mRNA throughout the body, can also cause blood clotting, contributing to adverse health events and deaths.

“Many components of the mRNA platform can facilitate disease and death,” Jablonowski said. This includes DNA contaminants that have been identified in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which he said “may trigger a deleterious immune response.”

Jablonowski said the Japanese dataset, which has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, requires further analysis:

“Though 18 million is an impressive number, the size of the dataset doesn’t make it good science — the control does. Without detailed data, it is impossible to distinguish between vaccination-induced death or death of those more likely to be vaccinated.”

But if the dataset includes data for “millions of people within the same narrow age range, the same comorbidity grouping and no difference in confounders” and shows elevated death rates for these groups, then the Japanese data would be enough to “sink the mRNA platform worldwide,” Jablonowski said.

Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSaware.com, has analyzed the Japanese data on his Substack page and in an online dashboard he developed. He said the data “appears to be very sound and in line to what appears and what does not appear in VAERS.”

VAERS is the U.S. government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

“Japan (2,396 deaths) sits at second place, only behind Germany (2,709 deaths), as the foreign country with the most COVID-19 deaths in VAERS,” Benavides said.

Data ‘enough to raise questions in the minds of all regulators’

The Japanese data are “enough to raise questions in the minds of all regulators for all mRNA products,” Campbell said, though he doesn’t expect it will.

Many researchers have focused their examination of vaccine-related adverse events on the first days following vaccination, he noted. “When it’s been 90 days, 120 days, they kind of lost interest and don’t make the link anymore.”

Yet, the Japanese data confirm findings of other studies that examined the longer-term effects of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

In a March interview, Campbell spoke with Robert Clancy, Ph.D., emeritus professor at the University of Newcastle’s School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy in Australia, who is reviewing data from a separate dataset that indicates a peak in excess deaths three months after vaccination.

In a May analysis, Campbell examined excess death figures from Our World in Data for 20 countries. The data showed that excess deaths remain high in most Western countries — where mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were widely administered — but are lower in countries where mRNA vaccines were less commonly used.

A 2023 analysis by Phinance Technologies found that, in the U.S., COVID-19 vaccines caused more than 300,000 excess deaths, injured 26.6 million people, disabled 1.36 million people, and cost an estimated $147 billion in damage in 2022 alone.

According to a 2023 report in InsuranceNewsNet, U.S. insurance companies expected higher-than-normal payouts from excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Insurers saw death benefits rise 15.4% in 2020, the biggest one-year increase since the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic, followed by a record $100.28 billion — nearly double the historic norm — in total death benefits paid out by the industry in 2021.

A paper published in April in the JMA Journal, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japan Medical Association, found that Japan had “the world’s highest rate” of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses per capita — and “a significant increase in excess deaths in 2022 and 2023.”

“Although several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these phenomena, the truth remains to be established because sufficient studies and data disclosures have not been conducted to adequately investigate the possible contribution of mRNA vaccines,” the paper stated.

‘Incomprehensible’ that mRNA vaccines continue to be administered

Campbell praised Japanese scientists and officials for their “greater openness” regarding COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events and deaths compared to other countries.

“Japan has been more transparent and vocal than most countries in mainstream and alternate media,” Benavides said. “Japan’s data is breaking through the data obfuscations and gatekeepers within VAERS.”

Campbell said it’s “incomprehensible” that mRNA vaccines continue to be administered with the “data that’s around now.”

“Regulators are going to have to answer for this sooner or later,” he said.

Rose said the Japanese data strengthen recent calls by scientists and physicians to suspend or withdraw the mRNA vaccines, but said what’s preventing such a ban “is the egregious demonstration of intentional harm to infants and children” by medical organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

Rose criticized the AAP for “continuing to recommend the COVID shots for infants and children, which is in direct contrast to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] recommendations.”

The AAP, which represents 67,000 pediatricians, is the recipient of substantial funding from Big Pharma — including vaccine makers — and the federal government.

“Their largest donors, as can be seen on their website, are Moderna, Pfizer, Merck and Sanofi,” Rose said. “Follow the money. This isn’t about health.”

Last month, the AAP and five other medical organizations sued U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other public health officials and agencies over changes to the COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for children and pregnant women, which led to new CDC COVID-19 vaccine guidance for these populations.

Jablonowski said, “A reasonable approach to regulation is to assume ‘harmful until proven otherwise,’” but the opposite has been true for mRNA vaccines. “The burden of proof should never fall on those with safety concerns, but on those who assert there is no concern for safety,” he said. "

Watch Campbell’s analysis here:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ABxekx2Rp3Y

Related articles in The Defender
Why Aren’t We Talking About Excess Deaths in Countries With High mRNA Vaccine Rates?
Insurance Industry Execs ‘Alarmed’ by Surge in Deaths Among Young People — But Stop Short of Blaming COVID Shots
Groundbreaking Analysis: COVID Vaccines Caused 300,000 Excess Deaths, $147 Billion in Damage to Economy in 2022 Alone
Scientists Petition FDA to Suspend or Withdraw mRNA COVID Vaccines
Leading Pediatrician Group Defies CDC, Tells Parents to Get COVID Shots for Infants, Kids

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV.

[onawah]

High Wire Episode 438: UNSETTLING SCIENCE
https://info.thehighwire.com/archive...46h2ach2sratbs
8/21/25
(Video at the link)

The first 17+minutes in the video is Del Bigtree shouting and practically hysterical (with good reason) about The American Academy of Pediatrics’ new “evidence-based immunization schedule” recommends COVID-19 vaccination for all children between 6 and 23 months of age “to help protect against serious illness.”

The last segment: " Del welcomes Paul Thomas, MD—retired pediatrician and author—who lost his medical license after publishing a pivotal vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study. Now, Dr. Thomas is fighting back, suing the CDC over the safety of its vaccine schedule."

[mountain_jim]

copying here

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://x.com/Humanspective/status/1962785242923835601

Humanspective
@Humanspective
·
9h
“This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever, to the human population"

Wait till Trump finds out Pfizer did a "Bait and switch", injecting the World with "Process 2", containing SV40 sequences.

Pfizer obscured SV40 sequences from the FDA and then "they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies", including Seagen for $43 billion.

Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan: "This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever, to the human population [and] this has gone absolutely off the rails"

[onawah]

Paul Offit Kicked Off Key FDA Vaccine Panel
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
September 2, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250902

(Podcast at the link. Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

(That has a certain ring to it... ..."Offit Kicked Off"......
For anyone familiar with the name Paul Offit in connection to vaccines crimes, this is wonderful, epic news!)



"Dr. Paul Offit, an infectious disease specialist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and outspoken critic of U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., told Endpoints News in an email today that the FDA did not tell him why he was being dismissed from the agency’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.
Dr. Paul Offit, a staunch vaccine advocate and outspoken critic of U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., will no longer serve on the committee that advises the FDA on vaccine approvals.

Offit, an infectious disease specialist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told Endpoints News today in an email that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not tell him why he was being dismissed from the agency’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC).

According to Endpoint News, a spokesperson with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the FDA notified certain committee members that their Special Government Employee terms had expired and that they were no longer permitted to do their committee work.

In June, an FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times that no changes to VRBPAC were planned “at this time.”

The committee reviews and evaluates data concerning the safety, effectiveness and appropriate use of vaccines. The FDA has historically supported the committee’s recommendations.

Offit had served on the committee since 2017, according to Medpage Today.

According to The Epoch Times, Offit was slated to serve on VRBPAC through Jan. 31, 2027.

Although Offit is no longer listed on the FDA’s VRBPAC website, several other committee members whose terms were also set to expire at the same time are still listed. They include Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D., dean of Chicago Medical School and Hayley Gans, M.D., a clinical professor at Stanford Medicine Children’s Health.

The FDA is accepting applications for its advisory committees. VRBPAC members are selected by the FDA commissioner or the commissioner’s “designee.”

Offit has been the mainstream media’s go-to commentator on vaccine issues.

Earlier today, Offit appeared on MSNBC. He praised COVID-19 vaccines and did not mention his dismissal from the FDA’s vaccine committee.

Kennedy fired Offit from CDC’s vaccine panel in June

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland, in a February 2024 op-ed, described Offit as a “Vaccine inventor, pharma spokesperson … and vociferous denier of vaccine harms.”

His dismissal comes less than three months after Kennedy named eight researchers and physicians to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine advisory panel to replace approximately half of the members he fired from the panel on June 9.

Offit was one of the members Kennedy fired.

In a late May interview with Tucker Carlson, Kennedy explained that members’ financial conflicts of interest — including Offit’s — had plagued the CDC panel for years.

“This was a long time coming, Tucker,” Kennedy said. He gave an example to illustrate.

Years ago, the CDC committee approved adding a rotavirus vaccine to the childhood immunization schedule, he said.

Four of the five committee members had “direct financial interest in the rotavirus vaccine,” Kennedy said. “They were working for the companies that made the vaccine, or they were receiving grants to do clinical trials on that vaccine.”

Within a year, that specific rotavirus vaccine was linked to “disastrous” disease in kids and pulled from the market. It was replaced by a different rotavirus vaccine that then-committee member Offit had helped develop.

“Then [Offit] and his business partners, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, and a couple of other people, sold that vaccine to Merck for $186 million,” Kennedy recalled.

According to Kennedy, Offit told Newsweek that he won the lottery. “It’s been said of him that he voted himself rich, so that kind of conflict was typical on that committee.” "

Related articles in The Defender
FDA Vaccine Advisers Vote on New COVID Vaccine Formula Amid Calls to Pull Shots From the Market
RFK Jr. Taps 8 New ACIP Members, Offit Concedes Most ‘Seem Reasonable’
FDA Advisers Bullish on RSV Shots for Kids, Even as Safety Signals Shut Down Moderna Trials
FDA to Remove Pharma Reps From Advisory Committees, But Conflicts of Interest Persist

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa.

[onawah]

McCullough’s “Vaccines” is a NYT Best Seller

Posted by onawah (here)
McCullough’s “Vaccines” is a NYT Best Seller
From: Childrens Health Defense <team@childrenshealthdefense.org>
9/6/25

Not only has our new book, “Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality,” been Amazon’s #1 Bestseller in three categories — Immunology, Vaccinations, and Virology — it has also done the seemingly impossible.

It hit #8 on the New York Times Best Seller List for hardcover nonfiction!

Hardcover Non Fiction - Vaccines Book Best Seller



Not just another book on vaccines — “Vaccines” is a riveting exposé that cuts through the noise, demolishes myths, and delivers the truth about public health in a way that’s both easy to understand and impossible to forget.

See for yourself why Amazon reviewers have called it:
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
“A Masterpiece of Intellectual Courage and Historical Illumination”
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
The most important book you need to read to understand how we have all been deceived
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
A strong case for genuine science!
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
A MUST addition to your library!!

So much more than a history lesson, “Vaccines” is a wake-up call.
Get the book Big Pharma hopes you never pick up.

Order your copy of “Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality” today and join the conversation that’s shaking the system.
https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Myth.../dp/1648211895

In truth and transparency,
The Children’s Health Defense Team

P.S. CHD publishes books on topics related to children’s health, including autism, vaccines, censorship, Big Pharma, and corruption.
Check out our whole collection:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/b...tm_id=20250906

[Kryztian]

Posted by onawah (here)
McCullough’s “Vaccines” is a NYT Best Seller

Posted by onawah (here)
McCullough’s “Vaccines” is a NYT Best Seller
From: Childrens Health Defense <team@childrenshealthdefense.org>
9/6/25

Not only has our new book, “Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality,” been Amazon’s #1 Bestseller in three categories — Immunology, Vaccinations, and Virology — it has also done the seemingly impossible.

It hit #8 on the New York Times Best Seller List for hardcover nonfiction!

Hardcover Non Fiction - Vaccines Book Best Seller

Note the "New York Times Best Seller Seller"synopsis, that this is merely about the exagerated benefits of vaccines. As far as I can tell, the book is also about the shoddy safety testing, the often harmful results of vaccines, how this harm is often ignored, and the smear campaigns of vax industry. Here is the publisher's synopsis from Amazon:

The word “vaccine” derives from the Latin word for cow. The English physician, Edward Jenner, coined it in his 1798 pamphlet An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccinae. The last two Latin words mean “Smallpox of the Cow,” or cowpox. Jenner postulated that cowpox causes mild disease in humans while protecting them from the more dangerous smallpox. His proposal for inoculation with a weak form of disease-causing matter to prevent serious illness became the central concept of infectious disease medicine and has remained so ever since. The word “vaccine” was subsequently applied to immunizations against all infectious diseases. Its etymology is amazingly apt, because vaccines are the ultimate sacred cow.

Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality tells the story of this technology and the celebrated men who developed it with some success, but also with failures that are never mentioned in the celebratory literature on vaccines. Vaccine advocates often proclaim that they “follow the science,” but most vaccine development has been a matter of guesses, gambles, and wild experimentation. Its key figures have been biased by religious faith, wishful thinking, ideology, and a desire for recognition and money.

Though credit is due to some vaccines for reducing infectious disease morbidity and mortality, their contribution to public health in developed nations has been grossly exaggerated by propagandists. Dramatic improvements in nutrition and sanitation were the primary drivers of this trend. The authors do not dismiss the concept of vaccination but seek to promote a more informed and less dogmatic discussion about its risks and benefits. Critical evaluation can only make the technology safer and more effective.

Pretty sure that this book will be presented at "anti-vax" although the last sentence says it all: "Critical evaluation can only make the technology safer and more effective."

I never realized that "vaccines" has the same root as "vacca" (Latin) or "vaca" (Spanish), the word "cow". They are indeed the golden calf for those at the intersection of capitalism and authoritarianism.