article: Marked as Intolerable: Historic Minds and State Suppression

[Squareinthecircle]

Marked as Intolerable: Historic Minds and State Suppression

The State vs the Greats
The outstanding stand out. It’s in their nature, obviously. They gain attention, and then processing occurs: determinations of threat status are quickly calculated by those that encounter. Err goes to the side of caution, perhaps too willingly- out of cowardice. If Jesus, Buddha, Joan of Arc, Socrates, Galileo, and Giordano Bruno lived today, they’d sit in the same lineup we call Targeted Individuals. The names and instruments change; the intention and fear do not. Power always has a way of marking what it fears. What follows is not biography, but a map of the attacks each endured — the era’s version of targeting, and an idea of how these greats would be treated today.

Jesus — crucifixion, public shaming, and religious verdict. He was branded a blasphemer, made an example in the public square so his message would be feared and forgotten. At every step the Pharisees and Sadducees tried to trip him up, working to draw out a blasphemy and make it stick. When their traps failed, they turned to character assassination everywhere they could, and finally handed him to the state for crucifixion — the ultimate public erasure. A familiar group, a familiar scene: it was a mixture of religious outrage and political force, and it shows that some things never change.

Buddha — exile and doctrinal isolation. Rival teachers and political authorities branded his practice heterodox and worked to starve his following of legitimacy. He eschewed royal life in search of wisdom, and that seemingly foolish move turned out to be the wisest move of all. But today Buddha would not be able to wander beyond the network’s reach. His transcendent vision might be of no use at all in this context. Notice how easily the mightiest are dismantled and sold for scrap.

Joan of Arc — interrogation, mockery, and execution by fire. Her visions were called witchcraft; the state burned the messenger to silence the claim. She had charisma enough to lead grown men into battle — a figurehead who would draw instant attention in the modern age. The wrong kind of attention. She would have been identified early, and all the designs of the devil would be used against her.

Socrates — legal prosecution and enforced death. His questions were criminalized; the city charged him with corrupting youth and offered death as the remedy. Even then, influencing the young was treated as a state matter. The real provocation may have been his conversations with so-called experts. Using only logic and critical thinking, Socrates left them exiting the exchange with the humiliating recognition that they knew nothing at all. This kind of boat-rocking gets noticed: it did then, and it would now.

Galileo — forced recantation and house arrest. Science was made a heresy; his truth subordinated to institutional dogma and punished publicly. Control and its pursuit was the overriding theme du jour, as always. Great minds often present as mavericks — think Tesla — and governments brand them political heretics in nervous first-strike fashion. Power decides whether such individuals should be absorbed or targeted. Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de’ Galilei, with his rebellious streak, would have been marked as an enemy of the state for his God-given abilities, his natural thought pathways, and the gall to exist.

Giordano Bruno — interrogation, imprisonment, and execution for cosmological heresy. He declared the universe infinite, the stars as suns, and other worlds as real as our own. To the authorities this was not science but sedition — a direct threat to their monopoly on truth. For seven years he was dragged through trials and prisons, paraded as a warning. Finally, he was bound and burned in Rome’s Campo de’ Fiori, his body offered up as proof that thought itself could be a crime. They silenced the man, but not the vision. That always survives.

Each of these was targeted by the tools of its time: laws, pulpits, councils, flames, prisons, courts, and assassins. Today those tools are updated — bans, shadowing, directed campaigns, technological intrusion, algorithmic character assassination, Directed-Energy Weapons (DEWs), Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM), Voice-to-Skull (V2K) — but the pattern is the same. Power doesn’t always need to raze the thinker; often it simply needs to install invisible barriers.

The pathology persists. Edward Snowden, Randy Quaid, Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Amy Eskridge — data analysts, scientists, soldiers, actors — show that those deemed a threat to the state can occupy any capacity, and no level of fame or notoriety dissuades the process.



https://kasspert.wordpress.com/2025/...e-suppression/