Look Who's Coming to the Rescue! Bill Gates...

[ExomatrixTV]

• Dutch Lawyer Suing Bill Gates Over COVID Vaxx ARRESTED!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-IvlxIOWoJM

[ExomatrixTV]

• Bill Gates Creepy New Lab-Made Fake Butter Hits Market!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mD2sKaQp1uY

[ExomatrixTV]

A new law in the US state of New Jersey allows parents to be punished for their children's behavior, even putting them in jail. Rachel Maniscalco, a mother of two, was a guest on Fox & Friends to discuss the new law. She pointed out the bigger picture: we're taking responsibility away from children.

source

• Still at large

The problem in society is that no one takes responsibility, Maniscalco argued. She cited Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci as examples: "Crimes against humanity, still at large."
She asked why we feign responsibility with children while failing to hold those in power accountable for their misbehavior.

• Unpaid leave

In 2021, Maniscalco, then a teacher in New York City, refused to be vaccinated against COVID-19. All school staff were then required to get at least one COVID-19 vaccine. She was subsequently placed on unpaid leave. "We don't think we pose a threat to public health. The science doesn't support that," she said on Fox.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[onawah]

Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr.
Redacted
2.74M subscribers
Aug 28, 2025

"Something big is happening at the White House right now. The purge is on. Did you know that Deatheater Bill Gates had secret people or plants hidden in the government pushing his vaccine agenda? Oh yes from getting rid of meat to mass vaccination programs on children? Well that appears to be coming to an end."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fPexjGuPmoA

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[seekingtruth]

[onawah]

"Bill Gates Crumbles Under Pressure from RFK Jr. and MAHA as OrganiPeel (made by APeel) is Officially Discontinued!"
Team Kennedy 2024
Rebecca Lynn Freeman

(It may take a minute to download)
https://www.facebook.com/reel/620580484441252

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

[sdv]

I wonder if the real agenda is to terrify people and thus get them to accept more government control and surveillance and repression? Vegetarian products are very popular in my country, and there is a wide variety available, like the Fry's brand. However, they are not cheap ... it is cheaper to buy a pack of chicken and make a meal than to buy a pack of delicious Fry's sausages or schnitzels to make a meal. Gates could afford to invest in existing vegetarian brands (and there are plenty) to make them far more affordable and thus more accessible. Maybe Americans would still not be interested, but they are a small percentage of the world's population.

It is just my experience, but only the wealthy are motivated by virtue signalling when making a purchase. For most people ... is it affordable, delicious, filling is as far as they go, and some might choose a personally healthier option if they can afford it.

Supposedly cows are a disaster for the planet because of flatulence (and?)? The age of dinosaurs must have been really bad for the planet.

I don't trust Gates and his motivations, and after his entanglement with Epstein, I don't trust his judgement either.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[truthseek]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Dutch Lawyer Suing Bill Gates Over COVID Vaxx ARRESTED!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-IvlxIOWoJM

Hi John, are there any updates about the court ruling in Leeuwarden? Cheers

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by truthseek (here)

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Dutch Lawyer Suing Bill Gates Over COVID Vaxx ARRESTED!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-IvlxIOWoJM

Hi John, are there any updates about the court ruling in Leeuwarden? Cheers

Will soon dig deeper in to it ..

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6uu0yc/?pub=4mai79

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

The World Health Organization (WHO) increasingly has to dance to the tune of its funders. This is evident from new research by the BMJ Group.

More than half of all donations from the influential Gates Foundation to the WHO between 2000 and 2024 went to vaccination programs and polio, while other important health themes remained heavily underfunded.

The research, presented this week in BMJ Global Health, casts a critical light on how funding streams determine the WHO's priorities. The organization, which is supposed to operate independently, in practice appears to be heavily dependent on external donors. And these donors have their own preferences.

Billions for vaccines

In total, the Gates Foundation donated 5.5 billion dollars to the WHO between 2000 and 2024, of which more than 3.2 billion went to polio. 2.9 billion was spent on vaccine projects. For comparison: only 0.2 percent of the money was spent on water and sanitation facilities, and 0.7 percent on strengthening health systems. And yet these themes are high on the WHO's priority list.

The figures also show that non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes, are being sidelined, even though they account for 74 percent of all deaths worldwide, three-quarters of which occur in low- and middle-income countries.

Donors decide

The WHO receives its funding from two sources: mandatory contributions from member states and voluntary donations from countries and organizations. But nowadays, as much as 90 percent of the WHO's budget comes from those voluntary contributions, and almost all of that money is 'earmarked.' This means it can only be spent on specific projects determined by the donors themselves.

The researchers warn that this system undermines the WHO's independence. "The mandatory contributions from member states are far below the level needed to finance the WHO's strategic goals. As a result, the organization is forced to rely on voluntary contributions from donors," they write. "The consequence is that themes in which donors are interested receive a lot of resources, while other crucial projects fail to get off the ground or remain understaffed."

What if the US leaves?

The situation becomes even more complicated now that the United States, currently the largest funder of the WHO, has announced its intention to withdraw from the organization in January 2026. The US has long been the biggest contributor to the WHO, followed by the Gates Foundation (with 9.5 percent of the total budget since 2010), Germany, and the United Kingdom. If the American contribution disappears, it will only increase the power of private players like the Gates Foundation. This will place the WHO even further under the influence of parties pursuing their own agendas, however well-intentioned they may be.

Nevertheless, the researchers point out that the blame does not lie solely with the Gates Foundation. "We must not forget that it is the member states themselves who have failed to increase their mandatory contributions in line with the WHO's growing needs," they write. "As a result, the organization is effectively forced to depend on voluntary donations."

The WHO has previously warned that the current financing model is unsustainable in the long term. Without structural reforms, the organization remains vulnerable to the influence of major donors. This severely limits the WHO's ability to improve health worldwide.

In other words: as long as member states do not take their responsibility, it is not the doctors and scientists who determine the course of the WHO, but the funders.

• Who’s leading WHO? A quantitative analysis of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s grants to WHO, 2000-2024

[truthseek]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
The World Health Organization (WHO) increasingly has to dance to the tune of its funders. This is evident from new research by the BMJ Group.

More than half of all donations from the influential Gates Foundation to the WHO between 2000 and 2024 went to vaccination programs and polio, while other important health themes remained heavily underfunded.

The research, presented this week in BMJ Global Health, casts a critical light on how funding streams determine the WHO's priorities. The organization, which is supposed to operate independently, in practice appears to be heavily dependent on external donors. And these donors have their own preferences.

Billions for vaccines

In total, the Gates Foundation donated 5.5 billion dollars to the WHO between 2000 and 2024, of which more than 3.2 billion went to polio. 2.9 billion was spent on vaccine projects. For comparison: only 0.2 percent of the money was spent on water and sanitation facilities, and 0.7 percent on strengthening health systems. And yet these themes are high on the WHO's priority list.

The figures also show that non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes, are being sidelined, even though they account for 74 percent of all deaths worldwide, three-quarters of which occur in low- and middle-income countries.

Donors decide

The WHO receives its funding from two sources: mandatory contributions from member states and voluntary donations from countries and organizations. But nowadays, as much as 90 percent of the WHO's budget comes from those voluntary contributions, and almost all of that money is 'earmarked.' This means it can only be spent on specific projects determined by the donors themselves.

The researchers warn that this system undermines the WHO's independence. "The mandatory contributions from member states are far below the level needed to finance the WHO's strategic goals. As a result, the organization is forced to rely on voluntary contributions from donors," they write. "The consequence is that themes in which donors are interested receive a lot of resources, while other crucial projects fail to get off the ground or remain understaffed."

What if the US leaves?

The situation becomes even more complicated now that the United States, currently the largest funder of the WHO, has announced its intention to withdraw from the organization in January 2026. The US has long been the biggest contributor to the WHO, followed by the Gates Foundation (with 9.5 percent of the total budget since 2010), Germany, and the United Kingdom. If the American contribution disappears, it will only increase the power of private players like the Gates Foundation. This will place the WHO even further under the influence of parties pursuing their own agendas, however well-intentioned they may be.

Nevertheless, the researchers point out that the blame does not lie solely with the Gates Foundation. "We must not forget that it is the member states themselves who have failed to increase their mandatory contributions in line with the WHO's growing needs," they write. "As a result, the organization is effectively forced to depend on voluntary donations."

The WHO has previously warned that the current financing model is unsustainable in the long term. Without structural reforms, the organization remains vulnerable to the influence of major donors. This severely limits the WHO's ability to improve health worldwide.

In other words: as long as member states do not take their responsibility, it is not the doctors and scientists who determine the course of the WHO, but the funders.

• Who’s leading WHO? A quantitative analysis of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s grants to WHO, 2000-2024

Very interesting info John! Thanks.

It leads me to the question: why spend so much on Polio Vaccines? What are they getting out of this research to further their nefarious agenda? One of the biggest heroes (debatable, I agree...) was a WW2 US president with polio -- quite an effective way to shape human thoughts on the polio subject. To this day many mainstreamers' "pro-vaccination" argument is that the polio vaccine saved lives. Most people don't dare to contradict this hypothesis.

Hence, I ask again, what is so significant about polio requiring all this funding still in this age? Cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes are a much more serious problem in modern (esp western) society. If Elon Musk's neurotech further advances the way he hopes it does, surely there won't be any future concerns for the paralyzing effects of polio? (tongue in cheek

[ExomatrixTV]

• Bill Gates’ EPIC FLIP-FLOP On Climate Change!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3XLxP1gFTUA

If you missed it, Bill Gates has recently changed his tune on climate change, opining that while the problem remains serious, it will not lead to humanity’s extinction — a notable shift from his earlier dire warnings. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger point to Gates’ apparent reversal as evidence of changing narratives around global warming, as they accuse mainstream media and elites of fearmongering for profit. Jimmy contrasts Gates’ comments with past “doomsday” messaging and praises climate realists who were previously censored or dismissed for similar views. The video ends by criticizing global climate policies, claiming exaggerated data about sea levels and weather, and framing Gates’ new stance as financially motivated.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6yv974/?pub=4mai79

[rgray222]

RFK Jr Uncovers the Horrible Corruption of Bill Gates

RFK Jr explains how Bill Gates had the foresight to buy over a million shares of BioNTech stock before COVID happened.

"The same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing the [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."



To view the the video of RFK discussing this follow this link.

https://robertfranciskennedyjr.subst...dRedirect=true

[ExomatrixTV]

• Arrested For Accusing Bill Gates Of Epstein Connections – Peter Flaherty Reacts!"

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=U-3VHtfT5kc

In a video that has gone viral and then some, Peter Flaherty of the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) stepped up to the microphone at the recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, but then his mic was suddenly cut and he was promptly arrested as soon as he brought up Bill Gates’ connection to Jeffrey Epstein. So at least someone is getting arrested in connection to Epstein, even though it’s just a corporate stockholder calling out the nefarious activities of billionaires. Jimmy and Americans’ comedian Kurt Metzger talk to Flaherty about the experience, why he thinks he was silenced, the awful state of politics in the United States and whether he plans to sue.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wCTUrfe8o7Q

5/26/23- Peter Flaherty, Chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, was interviewed by Terrance Bates on America's Voice about a trespassing charge being dropped after he was arrested at the Berkshire Hathaway shareholders' meeting on May 6, 2023. Prior to the interview, Flaherty released the following statement: The trespassing charge has been dropped, but I never should have been arrested. Nor should I have been handcuffed, fingerprinted, brought to jail, and detained for three hours. Berkshire Hathaway’s silencing of me is an ominous precedent for the rights of shareholders in public companies that cannot be allowed to stand. I did not just wander into the Berkshire shareholders meeting, nor did the incident occur during a question-and-answer session. I was a scheduled speaker, whose name appeared on the agenda, to speak in support of Proposal #8 for an independent chair. The proposal appeared in the proxy and for weeks shareholders had been voting on it. It was the subject of a detailed proxy memo we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21. As far as I know, the arrest of a shareholder during a proposal presentation has never before occurred at the annual meeting of a public company in the United States. Shareholder activists of the past such as Wilma Soss (the basis for the Carol Burnett “cleaning lady” character) and Evelyn Y. Davis often challenged and certainly annoyed CEOs, but their microphones were never cut and they were certainly never arrested. I have spoken at the annual meetings of dozens of public companies over the past 19 years. My demeanor at the Berkshire meeting was no different from any other. There was no reason to throw me out except that I came too close to the truth. Additional revelations about Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein since the meeting confirm the importance of the issue I sought to raise, namely the reputational risk to Berkshire Hathaway by having one individual hold both the Chairman and CEO positions, especially if that person is so closely identified with particular causes and personalities. The whole point of the shareholder proposal process is to allow shareholders critical of management an avenue to change corporate policy. To simply silence and arrest a shareholder who disagrees with management stands the whole concept of having public shareholders on its head. If Warren Buffett thinks that since he owns 15% of Berkshire shares, that he can act with impunity, he is mistaken. Shareholders have rights, and I intend to enforce mine.