Prince Andrew and the Left Hand of the Devil

[Tintin]

New Delhi: Britain’s Prince Andrew is once again facing serious allegations of child abuse. His relationship with controversies seems to be unending. The fresh allegations against the Prince were made during his visit to Ukraine amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. He visited Ukraine in June.

The Prince was apparently part of the delegation that visited the war-ravaged country during British Foreign Minister James Cleverley’s visit. The Prince is now facing serious allegations of abusing 2 children in a high-profile club in Kyiv. These allegations were made by James Obasi, a Nigerian origin person who was entrusted with the responsibility of hosting the British delegation at the club in Kyiv.

----------------------------

One can't really add to this in any meaningful way beyond this summary. Frankly despicable

----------------------------

Full article here: https://www.news9live.com/world/brit...kraine-2271914

Britain’s Prince Andrew accused of sexual abuse during visit to Ukraine
An eyewitness claimed that he saw Prince Andrew misbehaving with 2 children at a club in Kyiv |
Written By: Manish Jha | Edited By: Mani Raj

Text:

BREAKING REPORT: Prince Andrew accused of sexually abusing a 12-YEAR-OLD GIRL AND 10-YEAR-OLD BOY during a visit to Ukraine earlier this year.

TV9 News India reports The Prince was apparently part of the delegation that visited the war-ravaged country during British Foreign Minister James Cleverley’s visit.

James Obasi, an official working in a club in Kyiv, says that Prince Andrew had asked him to arrange some food and drink for the two children.

When he returned with food items for the children, he saw that Prince Andrew was behaving in an objectionable manner with the children.

He kept the plate of food and went away from there. When James Obasi returned after some time, he found the children in a critical condition.

There were hardly any clothes on the children’s bodies, the children were extremely scared and were crying continuously.

According to Obasi, he tried to take care of the children, but the security personnel took them away with them.

It is alleged that two days later, the children were taken to Paris by a British delegation in a special plane.

Source: Chuck Callesto - https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/st...55164459221090

[grapevine]

My heart is so heavy after watching that video, especially having watched the Alex Collier video yesterday. I sympathise with the eyewitness as he would probably have been killed if he hadn't gone along with it, but now he has to live with his conscience. I wonder what we would have done in the same position? If he'd told the Police/Press I doubt whether it would have made any difference at all, and they may even have been complicit - and that's the real problem isn't it? Not knowing what to do . . .

As an aside, I was returning home from shopping last week and noticed an elderly man hovering around a group of young children (aged between 8 and about 10), who seemed completely oblivious to the man's presence. As I walked past him I said, "Do you know these children?" and he nodded, although he didn't look me in the eye. I walked on a few yards then turned back and said to the children quite loudly, "Excuse me, do you know that man?" (who had sat down on a low wall at this point). The eldest boy looked a little startled, but then looked at the man and then back at me and said yes they did, and I felt a bit of an idiot as it must've been his grandfather who was keeping an eye on them. Nevertheless, I'll definitely do that again if I think something looks odd.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Miller (here)
"Excuse me, do you know that man?"

I'm glad you did that, and not just for their sake. Gives peace of mind if nothing else. Unfortunately, I wouldn't have been so brave.

As a man, you're most self-conscious of being one. It didn't used to be a thing, but it is now. I can't speak for every man, but in general, you wouldn't dare speak to a random child on the street, or approach a suspicious male guardian of one, not unless you've got back up. You're much more likely to get away with it as a woman, but us men, unfortunately, we've been put in a position where it's simply in our best interests to keep our eyes down and our gobs shut.

A thoroughly sad state of affairs.

[Kryztian]

Posted by Tintin (here)

New Delhi: Britain’s Prince Andrew is once again facing serious allegations of child abuse. His relationship with controversies seems to be unending. The fresh allegations against the Prince were made during his visit to Ukraine amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. He visited Ukraine in June.

The Prince was apparently part of the delegation that visited the war-ravaged country during British Foreign Minister James Cleverley’s visit. The Prince is now facing serious allegations of abusing 2 children in a high-profile club in Kyiv. These allegations were made by James Obasi, a Nigerian origin person who was entrusted with the responsibility of hosting the British delegation at the club in Kyiv.

Disgusting. Repulsive. Shameful.

While this is only one witness, and there is probably a lot more that can be investigated on this matter, we know we absolutely certainty that:

• Andrew Windsor (sorry, I refuse to call this entity "Prince") absolutely denied that he knew who Virginia Giuffre was, and then numerous photographs surface showing that he indeed know here well, proving that Andrew is absolutely liar.
  
  
• The crown paid taxpayer money (I think seven million) in hush money to Ms. Guffrie. In other words, British taxpayers had to pay lots of money to keep themselves from knowing the truth that their "prince" was a rapist of underage sex trafficking victims.
  
  
• It's clear that not only is Andrew a criminal, but the British Crown is an accessory to child rape. Just as the U.S. president's family has the Secret Service, the "Royal" Family has the Royalty and Specialist Protection division of Protection Command. They would know everything about the places where Andrew was going to visit before he ever got there. They would have clearly know that Little St. James Island, VI, (Jeffrey Epstein's compound) was a place where young women were trafficked and used as sex slaves. They would have also know where Andrew was going to in Kiev (if he did go there) and what criminal activities were going on there. They were clearly guilty of accessory to rape in the Virgin Islands and, if these new allegations are true, are also guilty of the same charge in Kiev.

When I asked people why Great Britain supports a "royal" family, I was frequently given the reason that they are models to look up. Over the last few decades, that answer seemed somewhat laughable, as their family shennanigans unfolded like a bad soap opera in the British tabloid press. But with the Guiffre story and now these new allegations, this clearly show that the British "Royal" Family is much worse the mediocre - they are, in fact, the dregs of humanity, using taxpayer money to enact unspeakable crimes.

I do think the British taxpayers should continue to support the Royal family lifestyle, living on government property and being fed at taxpayer expense, but they should be living not in Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle eating lobster and champagne, but in Belmarsh Prison eating four dollar a day meals and cleaning prison toilets!

[Kryztian]

Andrew Lownie has written biographies, and is no stranger to royalty, having written a book on the Mountbattens. He is working on one on Prince Andrew which seems near publication (although he didn't say exactly when.) Per this interview:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YUf23TO6ln4

• There are more women who were sexually abused by Andrew, and their testimony is forth coming.
  
  
• How his biggest crimes are financial ones. He uses his power and position to do favors for people and businesses. He stays in 5 star hotels paid for by the taxpayers to do business deals that do not benefit the British taxpayer. His ex-wife Fergie, also seems to be involved.
  
  
• His spending habits indicate that he has a lot of other income, other than his salary from the military and his annual stipend from the crown. This may also have something to do with his visits to Epstein Island.

[Kryztian]

Michael Cole, a BBC journalist, has covered the British royals for decades. He interviewed Andrew Windsor and Sarah Ferguson around the time their became engaged in the 1980s and it was considered one of the best interviews of royals ever.

Here he is to say that Andrew will never have a public life again. It seemed unlikely up until now, but the new Netflix movie Scoop has made that a definite. If he has any future, it is on the golf course.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=JMjh0dhSXVM

[Kryztian]

Alleged Chinese spy linked to Prince Andrew named amid row over foreign interests register
Claims surrounding businessman Yang Tengbo put spotlight on whether to designate China as enhanced risk
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...as-yang-tengbo

An alleged spy who befriended Prince Andrew has been named as the businessman Yang Tengbo, amid a row at the heart of government over how to deal with influential Chinese nationals.

Yang Tengbo insisted he was not a spy and had done ‘nothing wrong or unlawful’.

The allegations surrounding Yang have cast a spotlight on the government’s plans for a foreign interests register and whether to designate China as an enhanced risk in the middle of Labour’s new charm offensive towards Beijing.

The security minister Dan Jarvis said a planned shake-up of security laws that would require those working for a foreign government to declare this or face criminal prosecution would now not be ready until summer 2025. His Tory predecessor Tom Tugendhat said MI5 had advised that the scheme would be pointless unless it designated China as the highest risk.

Yang, who split his time between the UK and China for almost two decades, ran the Duke of York’s Pitch@Palace in China – a Dragons’ Den-style project. He was also given authority to act on the prince’s behalf in Chinese business dealings, according to court documents.

He was also pictured with two former Conservative prime ministers, Theresa May and David Cameron. Yang is also known to have met a number of other politicians, including the former deputy prime minister John Prescott.

In a statement, Yang insisted he was not a spy and had done “nothing wrong or unlawful” and had asked the high court to lift the anonymity order so he could challenge “ill-founded” claims against him.

Jarvis told the Commons on Monday the government would lay the regulations for foreign influence registration scheme (Firs) in the new year with it going live in summer 2025. He said no decision had been taken on whether to designate China as an enhanced risk.

Under Firs there would be a basic level of declarations, called the political influence tier, and an enhanced tier, for countries deemed a threat to national security such as Russia.

Tugendhat told the Guardian that Yang would have been covered under the scope of Firs if it had been in place. Speaking in the Commons on Monday, the Tory MP said his officials had told him the scheme was ready and questioned why the government was delaying. “The advice from MI5 was very, very clear. If China isn’t in the enhanced tier it’s not worth having,” Tugendhat said.

A business source said there was a split between the Home Office, which wants China to be designated a threat to national security under the scheme, and the Treasury, which is relaying concerns about the burden on businesses. “That fight is under way again in Whitehall,” the source said.

A Conservative source said Rishi Sunak’s government had decided to include China in the enhanced tier after a similar debate took place internally.

“The City had some concerns that they would have to be putting on reams of paperwork for whatever deal they did,” they said. It was reported in the spring that leading banks and other financial services firms included HSBC, Standard Chartered and Prudential were lobbying ministers to tone down the plans.

However, the Conservative source said all departments including the Treasury eventually came round to the decision to include China in the enhanced scheme.

Ministers are simultaneously carrying out a cross-Whitehall audit of the UK-China relationship, which insiders now expect to conclude in March.

Yang, 50, the former chair of Hampton Group, a consultancy firm, had been in the UK for almost two decades. He was first stopped by counter-terrorism services in 2021 and ordered to surrender his devices.

In February 2023, Yang was “off-boarded” from a flight from Beijing to London and in March he was excluded from the UK. His appeal against the decision was rejected last week by the special immigration appeals tribunal (Siac).

The businessman had visited the UK regularly, attending events at a series of royal residences including Andrew’s birthday party at the prince’s Windsor home.

The hearing heard Yang was barred because he was believed to be associated with China’s United Front Work Department, which seeks to gather intelligence on influential overseas nationals. The ruling said in his witness statement Yang had “downplayed his links” with the group.

In a statement on Friday, Andrew’s office said he had stopped all contact with the man, whom he had met through “official channels” with “nothing of a sensitive nature ever discussed”. The duke is to stay away from the royal family’s traditional Christmas gathering at Sandringham this year amid the controversy.

Yang said in a statement he was devastated to have been excluded from the UK and denied he had ever acted against British interests. He said there was a “high level of speculation and misreporting in the media, and elsewhere” and he was applying to appeal against the decision to exclude him.

“The political climate has changed, and unfortunately, I have fallen victim to this. When relations are good, and Chinese investment is sought, I am welcome in the UK. When relations sour, an anti-China stance is taken, and I am excluded,” he said.

In the judgment that upheld his exclusion from the UK, the judge found Yang “won a significant degree, one could say an unusual degree, of trust from a senior member of the royal family who was prepared to enter into business activities with him”.

When the businessman’s phone was searched, officials uncovered a letter from March 2020 from Dominic Hampshire, a senior adviser to Andrew, which referred to him being invited to the prince’s birthday party that month and said: “Outside of his closest internal confidants, you sit at the very top of a tree that many, many people would like to be on.”

A document was also found on Yang’s phone that had “main talking points” for a call with Andrew, which said he was “in a ‘desperate situation and will grab on to anything’.”

Guy Vassall-Adams KC, acting for Yang, told the high court threats to name his client in parliament by MPs had been part of the reason he had decided to apply to lift the anonymity order.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...as-yang-tengbo

[Kryztian]

Prince Andrew Set to Flee England for Controversial Secret Palace Overseas

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/g...as/ar-AA1wdvd4

Prince Andrew may have been frozen out of the British royal family yet again, but another royal family seems keen to adopt him.

The prince has been gifted the use of a palace in Abu Dhabi by the country’s autocratic elite, the royal historian and freedom-of-information campaigner Andrew Lownie will claim in a hotly anticipated biography of the prince to be published next year, The Daily Beast can reveal.

The Daily Beast reported this week that several of Andrew’s friends say he could “do a Harry” and flee the U.K. for the Middle East next year after feeling that he has been unfairly treated over his relationship with Yang Tengbo.

Yang is a Chinese businessman formerly based in London who has been unmasked as a suspected Chinese spy. He successfully cultivated a close personal and business relationship with Andrew after he was expelled from the royal family (for the first time) after his disastrous BBC interview about his relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Documents found in Yang’s possession highlighting “main talking points” for a call with Andrew said he was “in a desperate situation and will grab on to anything.”

Yang ran the Chinese arm of Andrew’s Pitch@Palace initiative, and Andrew was entitled to a 2 percent cut of any investment deals made.

It is a matter of public record that Andrew freely used private palaces owned by the UAE’s ruling House of Nahyan when he was a trade ambassador for the U.K. over a decade ago. However, Lownie, who is writing a biography of the prince due out next year called Entitled: The Controversial Lives of the Duke and Duchess of York, told the Daily Beast that Andrew continues to have exclusive access to at least one fully staffed private palace in the country despite not technically owning it.

The revelation will raise yet further questions about how Andrew pays for his lavish lifestyle.

Fears that foreign powers have compromised Andrew have escalated in the wake of the stunning financial and espionage scandal roiling the U.K. establishment.

Andrew has been entirely excluded from the royal family’s Christmas celebrations as a result of the latest scandal. He seems to have exhausted the forbearance of his brother, King Charles III, which had seen him and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, slowly brought back into royal life.

Lownie, who has waged a decade-long freedom-of-information war with royal authorities over access to a laundry list of concealed documents, told the Daily Beast: “Andrew has been given the use of a palace by the Abu Dhabi authorities. It costs them nothing. He has been spending a lot of time out there in recent years and I am told by reliable sources that from next year he may divide his time between the Middle East and the U.K. He is expected to go between the two.

“It makes sense for him; there is good weather, he is treated with deference, there are a lot of golf courses, and he can conduct his business affairs however he sees fit.

“The whole family are up to their necks in it. The children, Beatrice and Eugenie, have been out in the Middle East and so has Fergie.”

Prince Andrew no longer has a spokesperson; a solicitor who has worked for him extensively and a PR executive thought to sometimes help him did not respond to requests for comment.

Lownie points out that it is well established that Andrew and his family have admitted to or been proven to have accepted money from dubious foreign individuals.

In just one recent case, a lawsuit revealed that Andrew, his ex-wife, and their daughters received a series of payments totaling £1.4 million ($1.75m) from an alleged fraudster, Selman Turk. Turk allegedly duped a Turkish heiress into sending Andrew the money. Turk, who denies the allegations, also won a “People’s Choice” award at one of Andrew’s Pitch@Palace events. Turk has been jailed for contempt of court for failing to produce documents as ordered. The case is ongoing.

In another widely publicized case, Andrew received £3 million ($3.75m) more than the asking price for his home when he sold it in 2007 to the son-in-law of the then-president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. The house sat empty for years, was demolished and rebuilt, and is now empty again.

It was first reported in 2010 that Andrew had free use of a “very impressive” and “gilded mini-palace” in Abu Dhabi. Andrew’s then-spokesman confirmed he was “given the use of a villa by the Abu Dhabi royal family” for both personal and professional use.

Norman Baker, a former British government minister who wrote extensively about the royals’ finances in a book entitled And What Do You Do?—which has a chapter about Prince Andrew titled “The Grand Old Duke of Sleaze”—told the Daily Beast: “While Andrew’s involvement with Epstein was pretty distasteful, the real scandal is his abuse of his position as U.K. trade envoy to enrich himself. Why was he engaged so heavily with this Chinese person, and why was the Chinese person engaged with him? The only logical explanation was he wanted money because he was, to quote the Chinese alleged spy’s email, ‘desperate.’

“Andrew suffers from a fatal combination of arrogance, stupidity, and greed, which leads him to do the things he does. But actually, the practice of taking something for nothing from an external source, the practice of dealing with unpleasant regimes across the world, the practice of being prepared to hide everything—these are traits that apply to Charles and the rest of the royal family. It’s just they’re rather more subtle about it.

“It wasn’t very long ago that Charles was captured accepting bags of cash, thousands of pounds of cash in Fortnum & Mason bags, from an overseas donor of dubious integrity. He looked like a mafia boss. So, Andrew in a sense is no different from anybody else. He’s just more clumsy and stupid about it.”

if Andrew does end up in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, he will be able to compare notes with another disgraced royal, Spain’s King Juan Carlos, who has lived there since 2020 when he fled Spain amidst a corruption scandal.

[Bill Ryan]

Just released:

WORLD EXCLUSIVE: 'Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls' — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1920229624774033524

[onawah]

King Charles' Mentor Lord Mountbatten Exposed Andrew Lownie Podcast 780 Royal Family Prince Harry
Shaun Attwood
1.03M subscribers
8/18/25

"Andrew's new biography claims startling insight into the private lives of the Duke of York and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson. From relationships with women to Andrew’s mysterious finances, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, by the historian Andrew Lownie, also dives into the prince’s ill-advised friendship with the disgraced US financier Jeffrey Epstein."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KQj-kA2iV60

[Bill Ryan]

Copying this important update posted by onawah on the Breaking News thread:

~~~

Andrew stripped of 'prince' title and will move out of Royal Lodge | BBC News

10/30/25

Andrew will lose his title and move out of Royal Lodge, a statement from Buckingham Palace has said.

Buckingham Palace says the King "has today initiated a formal process", and his brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

As well as the title, the Palace says "formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease" on Royal Lodge, and Andrew will move to the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the Palace said.

Andrew gave up his other royal titles earlier this month after more questions about his private life. In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always denied the claims.

Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VB2eRwOp_Ck

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by the BBC an hour ago, clearly showing the public response.

'Question Time' audience reacts to Andrew losing 'prince' title

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=e6hii6PMu5I

[Mari]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Copying this important update posted by onawah on the Breaking News thread:

~~~

Andrew stripped of 'prince' title and will move out of Royal Lodge | BBC News

10/30/25

Andrew will lose his title and move out of Royal Lodge, a statement from Buckingham Palace has said.

Buckingham Palace says the King "has today initiated a formal process", and his brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

As well as the title, the Palace says "formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease" on Royal Lodge, and Andrew will move to the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the Palace said.

Andrew gave up his other royal titles earlier this month after more questions about his private life. In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always denied the claims.

Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VB2eRwOp_Ck

And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Hallelujah! About bloody time their Majesties coughed up this one, because it was sorely lacking in any 'statement' given out by the former prince -not that any of us expected it from him. It's good that the current holders of the Throne recognise just what needs to be voiced and acknowledged.

[onawah]

This one too: Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended.
I imagine that after that reveal, the Royals couldn't continue with the pretense.

Posted by Mari (here)
And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."
.

[bojancan]

Interesting talk today... now.. I was listening part of talking by Paul Former / former Royal Protection Officer with Shaun, Paula and Lauren... topic Andrew and Epstein Saga...
I was thinking while listening it all about Andrew... if he is gonna start ratting people out.... cutting deals with potential investigators... it seams to me it is not finished yet...

Nov, 02
Shaun Attwood
1.05M subscribers
PRINCE ANDREW EXPOSED by Royal Family EX COP Paul Page Pt 3 - Virginia Epstein Maxwell King Charles

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=i1v1tmVOvls

[Mari]

Posted by onawah (here)
This one too: Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended.
I imagine that after that reveal, the Royals couldn't continue with the pretense.

Posted by Mari (here)
And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."
.

The fact was, this man was caught out in a Lie - not just one, but several, and they were pretty pathetic lies - 'I have a condition' whereas I can't sweat', was his 'alibi' for not visiting that nightclub with Virginia Guiffre. Among several others, he dragged his daughters Beatrice and Eugenie into it by stating he took them (or one of them) to Pizza Express (on a particular night) Its a mark of the sheer arrogance and stupidity of the man that, despite 'advice' from his advisors, he decided to go ahead with that Newsnight interview back in 2019, thinking his 'charisma' would carry him through. What a Twat, as we British like to say.

[happyuk]

Posted by Mari (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Copying this important update posted by onawah on the Breaking News thread:

~~~

Andrew stripped of 'prince' title and will move out of Royal Lodge | BBC News

10/30/25

Andrew will lose his title and move out of Royal Lodge, a statement from Buckingham Palace has said.

Buckingham Palace says the King "has today initiated a formal process", and his brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

As well as the title, the Palace says "formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease" on Royal Lodge, and Andrew will move to the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the Palace said.

Andrew gave up his other royal titles earlier this month after more questions about his private life. In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always denied the claims.

Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VB2eRwOp_Ck

And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Hallelujah! About bloody time their Majesties coughed up this one, because it was sorely lacking in any 'statement' given out by the former prince -not that any of us expected it from him. It's good that the current holders of the Throne recognise just what needs to be voiced and acknowledged.

The swamp runs deep in the establishment. According to Lord Mountbatten’s biographer, authorities in the US destroyed FBI dossiers on Lord Mountbatten at the request of the British Government after the discovery of a wartime file accusing the royal of being a paedophile. Lord Mountbatten (Prince Andrew's great-uncle) was alleged to be a homosexual with a perversion for young boys. The FBI files reportedly span over three decades, starting during his tenure as Supreme Allied Commander, South East Asia, in 1944.

One FBI file dating from February 1944 records a statement by Elizabeth de la Poer Beresford, Baroness Decies, who said:

In these circles Lord Louis Mountbatten … and his wife are considered persons of extremely low morals. … He is known to be a homosexual with a perversion for young boys.

The files also remark that Mountbatten and his wife, Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma, were judged by some sources as

persons of extremely low morals.

One theory that has done the rounds is that UK spooks found out about the IRA's genuine plan to bomb his boat and did....nothing, because they were so sick of him compromising national security they let it happen.

[Bluegreen]

The fated exclamation points that put Andrew into exile.

[Mari]

Posted by bojancan (here)
Interesting talk today... now.. I was listening part of talking by Paul Former / former Royal Protection Officer with Shaun, Paula and Lauren... topic Andrew and Epstein Saga...
I was thinking while listening it all about Andrew... if he is gonna start ratting people out.... cutting deals with potential investigators... it seams to me it is not finished yet...

Nov, 02
Shaun Attwood
1.05M subscribers
PRINCE ANDREW EXPOSED by Royal Family EX COP Paul Page Pt 3 - Virginia Epstein Maxwell King Charles

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=i1v1tmVOvls

I don't think he will 'rat' on his family, as no doubt his brother, as part of Andrew's 'package', will have threatened him with his daughters being stripped of their titles should he do so. Whatever you may think of him, AMW does love his daughters. Let's hope he truly does think of their welfare.

[happyuk]

JUST IN - Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, ordered by House Democrats to appear before congress in Washington, DC for questioning over his links to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.