In my view, the problem with Trump's tariffs has always been that he uses them as a bullying tool and a way of extracting money from the American population rather than a protection measure for domestic business and industry. It is not unusual for a country to use tariffs for the latter.Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I'm as far as one might imagine from being an expert on these matters! But as far as I've been able to understand, it's not that 'tariffs are unconstitutional', but that their use as a proxy for sanctions against a perceived adversary, rather than a purely domestic economic tool, may be what's actually unconstitutional.Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
If Tariffs were unconstitutional then every president before the free trade deals has violated it.
Tariffs were a way of life before about 1980. How quickly we forget if it is convenient.
In my opinion, most governments end up using tariffs to extract more tax from the population rather than protect industry and communities at home. Here is an example: Temu sells a wide range of products very cheaply. So does Walmart. The products that these companies sell are only unique in that they are cheap. South Africa has allowed each of these companies to open major stores in the country. Because of BEE regulations, the government can funnel money to the elite who keep the ANC in power, but the employment provided is a drop in the bucket in solving the unemployment problem and local businesses will not be able to compete with the very low prices that these two giants from the two biggest economies in the world can afford. (By opening stores in the country, Temu and Walmart can side step tariffs and the BEE dividend they have to pay is less than what they would have to pay in tariffs and import costs.)
The big clue that Trump's tariffs were not designed to protect home business and industry is that they were blanket tariffs. Imposing a high tariffs on a group of islands inhabited by birds and penguins was another clue! At least in South Africa, tariffs are not blanket tariffs (depends on the product and complex trade deals negotiated with other countries).
Ultimately, Trump's administration has become a war with the people of the USA because his grandiose narcissism drives him and he is surrounded by sycophants instead of people with depth and experience and the patience to do the right thing, long term. He counts on a brainwashed (TV, Internet, social media, influencers ...) population being easy to distract and rile up and gaslight, and they are, except for a number of independents (like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and so on) who, although often misguided, just will not shut up nor censor themselves.




Reply With Quote