Vaccination Injuries On Record for Covid19

[ExomatrixTV]

• Watch Novak Djokovic’s Reaction When Piers Morgan Apologizes for What He Said About Him:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fGYvn3BI90s

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” shares a DM clip of Piers Morgan apologizing to Novak Djokovic on “Piers Morgan Uncensored” for his attack on him for being unvaccinated during the COVID pandemic.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-gG_vSgyiII

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

• The Covid Vaccines: "The Biggest Crime Ever Committed on Humanity"

[ExomatrixTV]

flashback:

• They Will Kill Millions with the Vaccine — Science Magazine Denies - Judy Mikovits:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=joI48iCD8QI

• freedomplatform.tv/responding-to-criticism-surrounding-my-viral-documentary-the-plandemic-dr-judy-mikovits

[onawah]

Vaccine Injury Lawyer Delivers Scathing Rebuke of Childhood Vaccine Schedule — Offit, Hotez Decline Invitation to Debate
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Childrens Health Defense
December 5, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tation-debate/

(Video and podcast at the link. Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

(But it's only been proven that a mere 10 kids died from vaccines, right? NOT!! )

"Vaccine Injury Lawyer Delivers Scathing Rebuke of Childhood Vaccine Schedule — Offit, Hotez Decline Invitation to Debate
Attorney Aaron Siri told members of the CDC vaccine advisory panel that the childhood vaccines were recommended without sufficient data and that the expansion of the CDC schedule coincided with a rise in chronic illness among U.S. children. The panel invited high-profile vaccine proponents Paul Offit and Peter Hotez to present along with Siri, but they declined.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine advisory committee today heard from a vaccine injury lawyer who proposed the committee revisit the childhood vaccine schedule.

Attorney Aaron Siri told members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that the vaccines were recommended without sufficient data and that the expansion of the schedule coincided with a rise in chronic illness among U.S. children.

Siri, a vaccine critic and author of “Vaccines, Amen: The Religion of Vaccines,” called for a reexamination of the childhood immunization schedule based on “robust” safety data.

Siri challenged claims that the childhood vaccination schedule has been tested in its entirety, that the vaccines are safe and that routine childhood vaccines have been proven to prevent transmission.

He also questioned claims that scientists have conducted the testing necessary to assert definitively that there is no possible link between vaccines and autism.

Siri recommended ACIP revisit childhood vaccine recommendations based on “robust” clinical trial and post-licensure safety data and called on the committee to respect the “right of informed consent.”

“Mandates make vaccines political” and also “impact those who most need to avoid” certain vaccines, he said. When people report vaccine injuries, members of the medical community “pretend that they don’t exist.”

Siri represents plaintiffs in vaccine-related lawsuits against federal agencies and pharmaceutical companies.

Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland said Siri “accurately compared the pre-1986 Act vaccine schedule with the post-1986 schedule, when doctors and vaccine manufacturers have been absolved from all real responsibility for the vast vaccine injuries they have caused,” Holland said.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 granted vaccine makers immunity from liability for most injuries caused by their products.

ACIP didn’t vote on any aspect of the childhood vaccine schedule today. In June, ACIP formed a committee to study the cumulative effect of all vaccines given during childhood.

Key vaccine advocates declined ACIP’s invitation to deliver presentations

Siri’s presentation came shortly after ACIP voted to end the recommendation that all infants born in the U.S. receive the hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccine within 12-24 hours of birth.

The committee also voted to recommend that families determine whether to give their child the Hep B shot at birth through individual decision-making and consultation with their physician.

Siri cited the licensing of Hep B vaccines as an example of flawed studies leading to the licensing of a vaccine. He called those studies “underpowered” and “industry-funded.”

Siri’s presentation stirred controversy even before it began. In a post on X yesterday, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chairman of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) Committee, dismissed Siri’s qualifications and said ACIP “is totally discredited.”

https://x.com/SenBillCassidy/status/...tion-debate%2F

Post
See new posts
Conversation
U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D.
@SenBillCassidy
Aaron Siri is a trial attorney who makes his living suing vaccine manufacturers. He is presenting as if an expert on childhood vaccines. The ACIP is totally discredited. They are not protecting children.
https://cdc.gov/acip/downloads/agend...-12-03-508.pdf
6:55 AM · Dec 4, 2025
438.1K
Views

Siri responded that Cassidy’s post was “deeply ironic,” given that vaccine manufacturers are legally protected from lawsuits.

“Childhood vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot ever sue the company that killed or injured your child on the basis the company could’ve made the product safer. If vaccines are so safe, why do they need this protection?” Siri wrote on X"
https://x.com/AaronSiriSG/status/199...tion-debate%2F

http://Aaron Siri
@AaronSiriSG
Senator Cassidy, your tweet is deeply ironic given that I cannot virtually ever sue vaccine companies for vaccine deaths and harms because of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Childhood vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot ever sue the company that killed or injured your child on the basis the company could've made the product safer. If vaccines are so safe, why do they need this protection?

While I don’t “make a living” suing vaccine companies, representatives of vaccine companies regularly speak before ACIP to increase sales of their vaccine products. Yet, I have never heard you take issue with those presenters. Under your logic, in deciding upon a new car, one should only listen to car companies and salesmen, but not consumer advocates, like Ralph Nader, who sought to make them safer.

Since you want to engage with me publicly, let's make it substantive. Bring your evidence and let's have a long form public debate where we each get 10 minutes to go back and forth on each major vaccine topic. Will you agree to that?

ACIP member Dr. Cody Meissner called Siri’s presentation a “terrible distortion of all the facts” and said Siri shouldn’t have been invited. Earlier, Meissner voted against the proposal to end the universal Hep B vaccine recommendation for newborns.

ACIP also addressed controversy over Siri’s presentation and the lack of a pro-vaccine counterweight. Mina Zadeh, Ph.D., ACIP’s executive secretary, said the committee “invited several people to give us a broad perspective” on the childhood vaccination schedule.

Those invitees included two prominent and outspoken promoters of vaccines — Dr. Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, M.D., Ph.D. Both declined. Hotez told STAT that Siri “shouldn’t be there in the first place.”

Siri responded that the U.S. has “the worst health outcomes of all developed countries.”

Liability shield disincentivizes vaccine makers from performing proper safety testing

Siri used the opportunity today to criticize the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. He said the liability shield provided by that law disincentivized vaccine manufacturers from focusing on the safety of their products.

“Companies, including pharmaceutical companies, are driven by economic self-interest,” Siri said. “With drugs and non-routine vaccines, they … remain liable for the injuries caused by those products after they come to market and hence, they have an economic self-interest in doing robust clinical trials beforehand.”

“When it comes to routine childhood vaccines … they don’t have those same concerns,” Siri said.

He said the number of vaccines on the childhood schedule skyrocketed — from three to 72 — after Congress passed the 1986 act. Those initial three vaccines “were causing so much harm, all the manufacturers stopped making them or went out of business,” prompting the passage of the act.

“For every other product I’m aware of, the solution is to make a better, safer product. But when it came to these vaccines, Congress went a different way” by giving these companies “unprecedented broad immunity,” Siri said.

‘You can’t find what you’re not studying’

Siri also criticized the shortened clinical trial process for childhood vaccines, which results in recommendations being made on the basis of insufficient data and the inability to detect any long-term health impacts from the vaccines.

“Most recommendations for routine use by ACIP of a particular vaccine happened very shortly after its licensure, and hence the primary data often available for a specific vaccine would have been its clinical trial data,” Siri said.

He also criticized the lack of post-licensure safety monitoring.

“You can’t find what you’re not studying,” Siri said. “When you give a product to a baby or an infant in particular, you often won’t know what neurological, immunological or developmental issues that product can cause until you’ve tracked that child for at least a few years.”

Citing autism as the “injury claimed to be the most thoroughly studied,” Siri said the medical community has not conducted studies that would definitively eliminate a vaccine-autism link, even though the 1986 act listed autism as one of 11 conditions that warrant further study to determine a possible link with vaccination.

“It was a commonly claimed enough injury back in 1986 … to make it on this list of 11 conditions,” Siri said.

U.S. ‘an international outlier’ on childhood vaccination

Today’s meeting also included a presentation by Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., who earlier this week was named the next leader of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

Høeg compared U.S. childhood vaccine requirements and health outcomes with those of her native Denmark. There are “eye-opening differences in the recommendations” between the two countries, she said.

While the U.S. requires 72 core childhood vaccine doses, Denmark requires 11 — in line with most other high-income countries. Høeg said this makes the U.S. “an international outlier” on childhood vaccination.

The higher vaccine load “results in an increased exposure to aluminum,” Høeg said, with U.S. children exposed to 5.9 milligrams (mg) of aluminum by age 2 and 8.0 mg by age 18. In Denmark, the corresponding figures are 1.4 and 2.9 mg, similar to other high-income countries.

While there isn’t “robust enough” data indicating “specific health concerns” resulting from this level of aluminum exposure, Høeg said there also is insufficient data to establish a safe level of exposure.

“We need to admit that we may not know what the side effects of doing this, especially all at once, could be,” she said.

Increased vaccination also hasn’t delivered better health outcomes for U.S. children, according to Høeg. She cited the examples of the Hep B and meningococcal vaccines, which Denmark does not recommend for children, unlike the U.S. Yet, levels of hepatitis B and meningitis among children in the two countries are similar.

Høeg said U.S. health agencies should “avoid overmedicalizing childhood” and owe American children recommendations that are “based on data and not politics.”

Potential risks of post-vaccine aluminum accumulation ‘a warranted concern’

Dr. Evelyn Griffin, an OB/GYN and member of three ACIP work groups called for more research into the safety of aluminum-based adjuvants used in vaccines.

Griffin said aluminum salts are the most widely used adjuvant. Yet, the mechanisms underlying the use of aluminum salts in vaccines “are not fully understood.” She said only one peer-reviewed study has examined the effects of aluminum in infants’ blood following vaccination — but that study used a small sample and didn’t collect long-term data.

According to Griffin, current FDA aluminum exposure limits are increasingly questioned, as “appropriate testing was not performed.” She said recent studies have suggested that aluminum accumulation is “a warranted concern” and called for studies on the long-term impact of aluminum exposure and who is most at risk.

Griffin called on ACIP to determine how it can assess the safety and effectiveness of adjuvants in currently recommended vaccines for all ages, including studies regarding whether multiple aluminum-containing vaccines should be administered on the same day during early infancy.

In October, ACIP announced the creation of a new work group that will study the safety of aluminum adjuvants. ACIP did not hold a vote relating to the aluminum content of vaccines at today’s meeting.

Watch today’s ACIP meeting here:
VIDEO

Related articles in The Defender
CDC Vaccine Panel Votes to End Universal Hep B Vaccine for Newborns
Medical Establishment Mounts PR Blitz Amid Reports CDC Plans to Scrap Hep B Vaccine for Newborns
New CDC Work Group to Study Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines
CDC’s New Vaccine Advisers Vow to Study Cumulative Effect of Childhood Vaccine Schedule
Aluminum in Vaccines Far Exceeds ‘Safe’ Limits for Infants, Critics Say
.
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV.
"\

[ExomatrixTV]

• December 2025 'Blood Clots Surges': Dr McCullough's Revelations on mRNA COVID vaccines

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rGsXu59bC3w

The U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations held a crucial hearing titled "The Corruption of Science and Federal Health Agencies: How Health Officials Downplayed and Hid Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccines." Top medical experts and legal voices testified, including Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Jordan Vaughn, Dr. James Thorp, Dr. Joel Wallskog, Attorney Aaron Siri and Hawaii Governor Josh Green. Dr. McCullough presented findings from a large autopsy series, stating that in 73.9% of examined post-vaccine deaths, mRNA COVID vaccines were considered the likely cause—a claim that has sparked intense debate in the medical community.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UN_zGGFP1gw

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oZ1hgVNRMmE

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Truth Behind mRNA? – An In-Depth Conversation with Dr. Alexandra Henrion-Caude:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=JcRI4-7tu3E

In this episode, we delve into how the coronavirus period unfolded, how RNA technology played a role in it, and why communication between science, media, and politics became so strained. We explore what this dynamic means for trust, decision-making, and the lessons we can learn for future crises. What does all this say about the era we now find ourselves in?

• 00:00 - Introduction
• 00:29 - What the book adds to the coronavirus debate
• 01:33 - What RNA actually is (and why it's special)
• 03:12 - RNA as the true code of life
• 03:43 - How the book came about
• 06:06 - The sudden attention to RNA during the pandemic
• 07:43 - Media reactions & experiences with censorship
• 10:17 - Ban on media appearances and consequences
• 14:01 - Why are you writing about COVID vaccines? 16:01 – mRNA works differently than traditional vaccines
• 18:26 – Why mRNA research before COVID repeatedly failed
• 24:12 – A critical look at vaccines & adjuvants
• 25:55 – The call for a moratorium on mRNA technology
• 28:15 – mRNA in oncology: expectations vs. Reality
• 30:14 – Lipid nanoparticles & cell invasion
• 32:03 – Toxicity and distribution in the body
• 35:12 – Long-term presence of modified RNA
• 36:46 – Risk of defective proteins & autoimmunity
• 40:04 – ‘Necessity knows no law’: discussion about medical power
• 43:12 – Freedom, choice & mandatory vaccination
• 46:19 – Activism during the pandemic
• 50:22 – Why activism is sometimes necessary
• 53:20 – mRNA platforms continue to expand worldwide
• 54:38 – Respect for genetics & personal integrity
• 55:00 – Conclusion

[ExomatrixTV]

On ‘Long Covid Awareness Day’ it is important to know that a court in the Netherlands heard arguments that ‘Covid’ was planned in advance by Bill Gates, WEF and WHO…and that the ‘Covid Vaccine’ is a Biological Weapon “The Covid mRNA injection is a military-grade Bioweapon…”

• Covid Was Premeditated Murder & Vaccination Is Not Immunisation, It’s Extermination - Judy Mikovits

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xMpNTLZdjLE

Dr Judy Mikovits is a molecular biologist, medical researcher, author and activist whose outspoken opinions and groundbreaking work, somehow resulted in a wave of criticism as she was discredited by the mainstream medical industry.

Dr Judy has had her reputation destroyed in the media, and throughout the Covid-19 pandemic she quite literally became the most censored person on the planet. Her experience, validity and expertise in the realm of science and global health issues were called into question and the degree to which she was targeted was quite astonishing.

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

Judicial Process in the Netherlands against the "Great Reset" Agenda, Nanotechnology, and Transhumanism. March 2026. * Case Lawyers: Mr. Arno van Kessel and Mr. Stassen. * Plaintiff Organization: Stichting Recht Oprecht. * Context: March 2026 court hearing. Appeal filed against 17 international figures and the State of the Netherlands. Key Points Addressed in the Hearing: 1. The Transhumanism Agenda. The lawyer states that the "plandemic" is the cover for a transhumanist agenda orchestrated by global elites. He describes this project as an attempt to alter natural human biology and eliminate individual sovereignty in favor of technological control. 2. "Dual-Use" Nanotechnology. The nanotechnology present in the injections is explicitly mentioned. The lawyer argues that Lipid Nanoparticles are not simple medical components, but a technological platform of military origin (DARPA/Pentagon) designed to interact with the body's cells. 3. "The Great Reset" Project. The plan by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum is directly linked to the health measures. According to the lawsuit, this plan uses biotechnology to move toward a society where humans are integrated into a digital surveillance system. 4. Request for External Expert Testimony. The defense demands that international experts testify under oath regarding the findings of nanotechnology and other undeclared components in the vials, arguing that the court must know the true technical nature of what has been injected into the population. 5. Crime against Humanity. The legal team describes what has happened as the greatest fraud and genocide in history, stating that fear has been used to force the acceptance of a technology that changes the very essence of "human creation." Link to the translated video: Rumble: rumble.com/embed/v75399y/?pub=36f65jç Youtube: youtu.be/6N3beRFnjxk Link to the video in original version (Dutch): youtube.com/watch?v=cggHlTwYqsA Link to the Stichting Recht Oprecht foundation: https://rechtoprecht.online

• projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?122087-Help-get-Dr.-Reiner-Fuellmich-out-of-Jail-fast

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

[onawah]

The Coronavirus Pandemic: Six Years of Deception, Cover-Ups and a World Changed Forever
Redacted
2.88M subscribers
Mar 21, 2026

"On March 11, 2020 a pandemic was declared by the powers that be and our world changed forever that is not debatable. But why did it happen? How did it happen and what power structures were in place the created sheep of populations around the world that's the question that our guest Sonia Elijah aims to answer in her brand new book called 3/11 Viral Takeover."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tyr8QEcmGxg

**********

March 23, 2020: The Day England Locked Down. 6 Years Later, the Truth Emerges – Back on Redacted Discussing 3/11 Viral Takeover
Sonia Elijah
Mar 23, 2026
https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/march-...utm_medium=web

(Brief podcast at the link featuring preview on Redacted)

"Exactly six years ago today, March 23, 2020, Boris Johnson told the nation to “stay at home.” Schools closed, businesses shuttered, families separated, and the UK (along with much of the world) entered unprecedented lockdown.

What began as a health emergency morphed into something far more profound: a coordinated test of global compliance, fear, and control.

I was thrilled to return to Redacted with Clayton Morris to discuss my new book 3/11 Viral Takeover: On March 11, 2020, a Pandemic was Declared and Our World Changed Forever. We unpacked the forensic timeline, from the WHO’s March 11 declaration to the mechanisms that locked societies down and silenced dissent.

I hope you enjoy watching the full interview!"

*******************************


NOTE TO MODS:
This post contains an important interview and article and there are too many threads that it could be posted to; I think many of them need to be merged.
A new book is reviewed here about the vaccine crime itself, the motivation and organizations behind it, the lockdowns and the damage they caused, the harms the VAXX caused and the "treatments" for the harms it did caused, the media coverup, the ongoing repercussions, how it has helped usher in the NWO, etc. etc.
(The self-replicating nanobots in the Vaxx is one thing not mentioned, but perhaps just as well because most people don't seem able to deal with that yet though it is noted that the list of harms caused by the Vaxx is ongoing.)

[onawah]

Lawyers Threaten to Sue HHS Unless RFK Jr. Amends Vaccine Injury Table
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
March 23, 2026
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20260323

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

HHS has failed to fulfill its legal obligation to add new conditions to the Vaccine Injury Table when research indicates an association between a vaccine and a specific injury, according to a petition filed by Informed Consent Action Network.

A group of lawyers is demanding U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. add to the list of vaccine injuries included in the federal government’s vaccine injury table, or face possible legal action.

In a petition submitted last week to Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) said that HHS has failed to fulfill its legal obligation to add new conditions to the Vaccine Injury Table when research indicates an association between a vaccine and a specific injury.

The Vaccine Injury Table lists vaccines and associated injuries that are covered by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) — the federal program through which people injured by a vaccine can apply for compensation.

The VICP was established under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, or “Vaccine Act,” which granted vaccine manufacturers immunity from legal liability for most vaccine injuries.

Under the Vaccine Act, HHS is required to add vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine use in children or pregnant women to the Vaccine Injury Table within two years of the CDC’s recommendation.

According to the petition — signed by attorneys Aaron Siri, Elizabeth A. Brehm and Erin K. Bello on behalf of “numerous individuals injured by childhood vaccines” — federal authorities “have for years identified and acknowledged associations between specific vaccines and adverse health events” but failed to add the known injuries to the table.

“To avoid litigation, Petitioners respectfully petition and urge the Secretary to act immediately to fulfill the statutory mandate, strengthen and clarify the administration of the VICP consistent with congressional intent, and ensure that all vaccine-injured Americans receive the compensation they are owed,” the petition states.

In a July 2025 interview on “The Charlie Kirk Show,” Kennedy vowed to reform the VICP, calling it a “very heartless system.”

“The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,” Kennedy said. “I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.”

In September 2025, Kennedy suggested he could expand the Vaccine Injury Table to include symptoms commonly associated with autism.

According to the petition, the VICP and federal health agencies have not fulfilled their obligation to maintain a “safety net” for the vaccine-injured:

Petition a ‘remarkable document’

Urgent: Tell the FDA to Follow the Law on COVID Vaccines. Submit your comment!
FDA petition call to action
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...term=shortcode

“The VICP was designed to provide a safety net for vaccine-injured individuals — a promise to the American public in exchange for the significant legal rights they surrendered. That promise has not been kept, and as such, the VICP’s statutory objectives have not been realized.”

Wayne Rohde, an expert in vaccine injury compensation and author of “The Vaccine Court: The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” and “The Vaccine Court 2.0,” called the petition a “remarkable document” that outlines how the Vaccine Injury Table should be amended.

Unless Kennedy deems ICAN’s petition to be frivolous, HHS must refer the petition to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines for its recommendations. In January, Kennedy removed four members from the commission, potentially signaling broader changes to come.

After the commission issues its recommendations, or after 180 days — whichever occurs first — the HHS secretary must initiate a rulemaking proceeding or publish a statement of reasons for declining to do so.

Federal studies linked routine vaccines to injuries not listed on the table

The petition includes a list of vaccines and the additional injuries that federal research has linked to the vaccines, and therefore should be added to the table:

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and conditions including atypical measles, febrile seizures and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
The Hep A (hepatitis A) vaccine and conditions such as Bell’s palsy, GBS and multiple sclerosis (MS).
The Hep B (hepatitis B) vaccine and conditions such as apnea, encephalitis, GBS, herpes zoster (shingles), MS and Bell’s palsy.
The seasonal flu vaccine and conditions such as convulsions, encephalitis, Bell’s palsy, meningitis and myocardial infarction (heart attack).
HPV vaccines and conditions including deep venous thrombosis, GBS, MS, seizures and syncope.
Meningococcal vaccines and conditions including Bell’s palsy, convulsions, febrile seizure, GBS and MS.
The polio vaccine and conditions including convulsion, paresthesia and syncope.
The varicella (chickenpox) vaccine and conditions such as Bell’s palsy, GPS, meningitis and syncope.
DTaP and other tetanus vaccines, and conditions such as autism, myocarditis and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
Several federally funded studies, including a 2012 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, identified the injuries associated with the vaccines.

Federal agencies, including HHS, CDC and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), which oversees VICP, first commissioned and funded the IOM report in 2009. IOM is now known as the National Academy of Medicine.

A 2021 report by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) also identified potential associations between vaccines and certain conditions, as did CDC materials and vaccine package inserts approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“To be clear, HHS, CDC, HRSA, AHRQ, and the National Vaccine Program Office have publicly and continuously recognized numerous injuries as ‘associated with’ vaccines and yet these injuries have not been added to the Table in violation of federal law,” the petition states.

An association — instead of a definitive link — between a vaccine and an injury or condition is enough for the HHS secretary to initiate a rulemaking to amend the Vaccine Injury Table, the letter points out.

“The VICP was structured to operate in circumstances where scientific certainty is incomplete — not to delay Table inclusion until causation has been conclusively established,” the petition states. “These vaccines were recommended for routine use by CDC and these injuries are associated with these vaccines.”

According to Rohde, although the Vaccine Injury Table was amended several times — the routine flu vaccine was added in 2005, and the HPV and meningococcal vaccines were added in 2007 — some “emerging injury types were not addressed” until 2017.

Rohde said that VICP has, in several instances, recognized claims for injuries not listed on the Vaccine Injury Table, but said this process is often cumbersome for claimants, with “very lengthy adjudications of five-plus years.”

“It is the most difficult path to compensation in VICP, but also where the most important legal and scientific precedents are developed,” Rohde said.

Petition is just one of several actions asking HHS to support vaccine safety

Attorney Ray Flores, senior outside counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said ICAN’s petition is legally distinct from a citizen petition, such as one that CHD filed last year asking the FDA to revoke all existing licenses granted to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Flores said ICAN’s petition is also legally distinct from a citizen action — a provision under the Vaccine Act through which citizens can sue the HHS secretary for not performing a non-discretionary duty.

Last year, Flores sued Kennedy, alleging that HHS violated the Vaccine Act because it hadn’t established a vaccine task force to promote vaccine safety. Under the Vaccine Act, HHS was required to establish the task force and, every two years, report its progress to Congress.

CHD funded the lawsuit. In August 2025, HHS reinstated the task force in response to the lawsuit.

Flores said that ICAN can later provide Kennedy with a written notice to launch a citizen action. This would give Kennedy 60 days’ notice before a lawsuit is filed.

Rohde said that if Kennedy does modify the Vaccine Injury Table in response to ICAN’s petition, “it would be a major victory for those who have been injured.”

“The length of time to be compensated for many who file petitions with complex cases would be dramatically reduced,” Rohde said. "

Related articles in The Defender
‘Very Heartless System’: RFK Jr. Takes Aim at Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
RFK Jr. Revamps Commission That Advises on Vaccine Injury Program
RFK Jr. May Add Autism Symptoms to Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
CHD Asks FDA to Revoke COVID Vaccine Licenses, Calls on Public to Submit ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Comments
Breaking: HHS Reinstates Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines in Response to Lawsuit Funded by Children’s Health Defense
‘60 Minutes’ Exposes Vaccine Court Failures, But Critics Accuse CBS of Misleading on Vaccine Injuries

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV.

[onawah]

Posted by onawah (here)
Lawyers Threaten to Sue HHS Unless RFK Jr. Amends Vaccine Injury Table
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
March 23, 2026
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20260323

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

HHS has failed to fulfill its legal obligation to add new conditions to the Vaccine Injury Table when research indicates an association between a vaccine and a specific injury, according to a petition filed by Informed Consent Action Network.

A group of lawyers is demanding U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. add to the list of vaccine injuries included in the federal government’s vaccine injury table, or face possible legal action.

In a petition submitted last week to Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) said that HHS has failed to fulfill its legal obligation to add new conditions to the Vaccine Injury Table when research indicates an association between a vaccine and a specific injury.

The Vaccine Injury Table lists vaccines and associated injuries that are covered by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) — the federal program through which people injured by a vaccine can apply for compensation.

The VICP was established under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, or “Vaccine Act,” which granted vaccine manufacturers immunity from legal liability for most vaccine injuries.

Under the Vaccine Act, HHS is required to add vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine use in children or pregnant women to the Vaccine Injury Table within two years of the CDC’s recommendation.

According to the petition — signed by attorneys Aaron Siri, Elizabeth A. Brehm and Erin K. Bello on behalf of “numerous individuals injured by childhood vaccines” — federal authorities “have for years identified and acknowledged associations between specific vaccines and adverse health events” but failed to add the known injuries to the table.

“To avoid litigation, Petitioners respectfully petition and urge the Secretary to act immediately to fulfill the statutory mandate, strengthen and clarify the administration of the VICP consistent with congressional intent, and ensure that all vaccine-injured Americans receive the compensation they are owed,” the petition states.

In a July 2025 interview on “The Charlie Kirk Show,” Kennedy vowed to reform the VICP, calling it a “very heartless system.”

“The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,” Kennedy said. “I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.”

In September 2025, Kennedy suggested he could expand the Vaccine Injury Table to include symptoms commonly associated with autism.

According to the petition, the VICP and federal health agencies have not fulfilled their obligation to maintain a “safety net” for the vaccine-injured:

Petition a ‘remarkable document’

Urgent: Tell the FDA to Follow the Law on COVID Vaccines. Submit your comment!
FDA petition call to action
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...term=shortcode

“The VICP was designed to provide a safety net for vaccine-injured individuals — a promise to the American public in exchange for the significant legal rights they surrendered. That promise has not been kept, and as such, the VICP’s statutory objectives have not been realized.”

Wayne Rohde, an expert in vaccine injury compensation and author of “The Vaccine Court: The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” and “The Vaccine Court 2.0,” called the petition a “remarkable document” that outlines how the Vaccine Injury Table should be amended.

Unless Kennedy deems ICAN’s petition to be frivolous, HHS must refer the petition to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines for its recommendations. In January, Kennedy removed four members from the commission, potentially signaling broader changes to come.

After the commission issues its recommendations, or after 180 days — whichever occurs first — the HHS secretary must initiate a rulemaking proceeding or publish a statement of reasons for declining to do so.

Federal studies linked routine vaccines to injuries not listed on the table

The petition includes a list of vaccines and the additional injuries that federal research has linked to the vaccines, and therefore should be added to the table:

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and conditions including atypical measles, febrile seizures and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
The Hep A (hepatitis A) vaccine and conditions such as Bell’s palsy, GBS and multiple sclerosis (MS).
The Hep B (hepatitis B) vaccine and conditions such as apnea, encephalitis, GBS, herpes zoster (shingles), MS and Bell’s palsy.
The seasonal flu vaccine and conditions such as convulsions, encephalitis, Bell’s palsy, meningitis and myocardial infarction (heart attack).
HPV vaccines and conditions including deep venous thrombosis, GBS, MS, seizures and syncope.
Meningococcal vaccines and conditions including Bell’s palsy, convulsions, febrile seizure, GBS and MS.
The polio vaccine and conditions including convulsion, paresthesia and syncope.
The varicella (chickenpox) vaccine and conditions such as Bell’s palsy, GPS, meningitis and syncope.
DTaP and other tetanus vaccines, and conditions such as autism, myocarditis and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
Several federally funded studies, including a 2012 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, identified the injuries associated with the vaccines.

Federal agencies, including HHS, CDC and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), which oversees VICP, first commissioned and funded the IOM report in 2009. IOM is now known as the National Academy of Medicine.

A 2021 report by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) also identified potential associations between vaccines and certain conditions, as did CDC materials and vaccine package inserts approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“To be clear, HHS, CDC, HRSA, AHRQ, and the National Vaccine Program Office have publicly and continuously recognized numerous injuries as ‘associated with’ vaccines and yet these injuries have not been added to the Table in violation of federal law,” the petition states.

An association — instead of a definitive link — between a vaccine and an injury or condition is enough for the HHS secretary to initiate a rulemaking to amend the Vaccine Injury Table, the letter points out.

“The VICP was structured to operate in circumstances where scientific certainty is incomplete — not to delay Table inclusion until causation has been conclusively established,” the petition states. “These vaccines were recommended for routine use by CDC and these injuries are associated with these vaccines.”

According to Rohde, although the Vaccine Injury Table was amended several times — the routine flu vaccine was added in 2005, and the HPV and meningococcal vaccines were added in 2007 — some “emerging injury types were not addressed” until 2017.

Rohde said that VICP has, in several instances, recognized claims for injuries not listed on the Vaccine Injury Table, but said this process is often cumbersome for claimants, with “very lengthy adjudications of five-plus years.”

“It is the most difficult path to compensation in VICP, but also where the most important legal and scientific precedents are developed,” Rohde said.

Petition is just one of several actions asking HHS to support vaccine safety

Attorney Ray Flores, senior outside counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said ICAN’s petition is legally distinct from a citizen petition, such as one that CHD filed last year asking the FDA to revoke all existing licenses granted to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Flores said ICAN’s petition is also legally distinct from a citizen action — a provision under the Vaccine Act through which citizens can sue the HHS secretary for not performing a non-discretionary duty.

Last year, Flores sued Kennedy, alleging that HHS violated the Vaccine Act because it hadn’t established a vaccine task force to promote vaccine safety. Under the Vaccine Act, HHS was required to establish the task force and, every two years, report its progress to Congress.

CHD funded the lawsuit. In August 2025, HHS reinstated the task force in response to the lawsuit.

Flores said that ICAN can later provide Kennedy with a written notice to launch a citizen action. This would give Kennedy 60 days’ notice before a lawsuit is filed.

Rohde said that if Kennedy does modify the Vaccine Injury Table in response to ICAN’s petition, “it would be a major victory for those who have been injured.”

“The length of time to be compensated for many who file petitions with complex cases would be dramatically reduced,” Rohde said. "

Related articles in The Defender
‘Very Heartless System’: RFK Jr. Takes Aim at Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
RFK Jr. Revamps Commission That Advises on Vaccine Injury Program
RFK Jr. May Add Autism Symptoms to Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
CHD Asks FDA to Revoke COVID Vaccine Licenses, Calls on Public to Submit ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Comments
Breaking: HHS Reinstates Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines in Response to Lawsuit Funded by Children’s Health Defense
‘60 Minutes’ Exposes Vaccine Court Failures, But Critics Accuse CBS of Misleading on Vaccine Injuries

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV.

*********************

Tell the FDA to Revoke Licenses on COVID Vaccines
3/3/26
Children's Health Defense
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...term=shortcode

"Over 100,000 concerned citizens have submitted comments on our petition. We need you to add yours today!On December 8, 2025, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed a Citizen Petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Marty Makary requesting that the agency revoke all licenses for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Our petition points out that the FDA transitioned Comirnaty and Spikevax from Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) status to full licensure without requiring Pfizer or Moderna to conduct the clinical investigations the agency’s own guidelines typically require for new, Biologics License Application (BLA) approved drugs.

According to the petition, “Misbranding is a legal designation, not just a descriptive one, that constitutes a violation of federal law (21 U.S.C. § 352) that can trigger seizure, injunction, criminal penalties, and/or license revocation.”

Read the full petition and cover letter.

We need you to let Commissioner Makary know that you support this Petition: please comment on it, spread the word far and wide, and encourage others to leave comments to maximize our impact.

Submit a Comment
When writing your comment, feel free to use the sample comment below or rework it to relay your thoughts on how the COVID vaccines were handled and the impact that has had on human health and personal freedom. Please also feel free to tell your own story including why revoking the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccine licenses is important to you and/or your family.

Thank you for taking action by using your voice to make a difference in this historic campaign to restore transparency and integrity to the FDA.

Quick Tips
Only the fields marked with red asterisks are required.
If you are submitting a long personal comment, it’s beset to write that comment first (in a document or a draft email to yourself) and then paste the text into the online form. That way, you will still have your comment text if the form submission fails on the first try.
Choose “Individual Consumer” from the drop-down answers to “What is your comment about?”
You may attach supporting documents if appropriate.
You may file anonymously. Doing so removes some of the required fields.
If filing as an individual, address and phone number are not required.
Sample Comment
I support this action to revoke all licenses for Comirnaty and Spikevax COVID vaccines for all demographic groups because the manufacturers never met the requirements for a Biologics License Application as established by the FDA.

Furthermore, the impacts upon the health of our nation’s citizens and the state of personal freedom in our country by these improperly licensed vaccines have been catastrophic.

In 1976, an estimated 32 people died following vaccination for the swine flu, prompting the immediate end to the swine flu vaccine campaign in the U.S. In contrast, from December 2020 through November 28, 2025, there have been 1,671,991 adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System for the COVID-19 vaccines, including 38,913 deaths. Yet these products have remained on the market, heavily endorsed, promoted, and often mandated for people of all ages including young children.

I urge you to revoke the improperly-granted licenses for these extremely dangerous vaccines."

[ExomatrixTV]

• White clot proof:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=d2YiNVgot-A

Breaking Research Decodes the Mystery of “The Rubbery White Clots”:

• nzdsos.com/2026/02/04/breaking-research-decodes-the-mystery-of-the-rubbery-white-clots

First time, comprehensively characterised the anomalous intravascular casts (AICs),

commonly reported by embalmers worldwide as strange, rubbery white clots.

Research, significantly funded by New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS),

provides definitive analysis that these structures are a previously unrecognised and abnormal form of intravascular clotting.

Since 2021, global reports,

from embalmers and some clinicians have described the retrieval of long, elastic, white fibrous structures from blood vessels,

distinct from ordinary post-mortem clots.

New three-part study,

using international labs on three continents,

describes their structure, elemental composition and protein makeup.

Concluding they represent a novel and persistent pathological entity


Key Findings of the Trilogy:

Paper 1: Morphology & Histology

• preprints.org/manuscript/202601.1846

Established that AICs are not ordinary clots.

They are elastic,

lumen-conforming,

branched structures that form under active blood flow
(shown by partial “Lines of Zahn”),

yet are strikingly devoid of intact red blood cells and platelets.

Their rubber-like consistency and cohesive strength are incompatible with known pre- and post-mortem changes.

Lines of Zahn
characteristic of thrombus formed at the site of rapid arterial blood flow,

with laminations produced by successive deposition of platelets and fibrin (pale layers),

alternating with red blood cells (dark layers).


Paper 2: Elemental Analysis

• preprints.org/manuscript/202601.2149

Revealed the clots have a bizarre chemical fingerprint.

They are depleted in sulphur (a key marker of protein) and enriched in phosphorus,

a composition impossible for a normal, protein-dominant fibrin clot.

This indicates a hybrid organic-inorganic matrix, not a simple blood clot.

Paper 3: Proteomic Analysis

• preprints.org/manuscript/202601.2319

Solved the protein puzzle.

While the clots do contain fibrinogen, the building block of normal clots, the fibrin chains are in a very abnormal ratio (~1:7:3 for α:β:γ chains vs. the normal 1:1:1).

Critically, they are almost completely lacking in plasminogen (the enzyme required to break down clots), explaining their stubborn persistence.

The protein profile also shows signs of inflammatory and immune system involvement as well as red cell destruction.

Senior Researcher Dr Bruce Rapley

“This is not just a big blood clot. This is a fundamentally different architecture.

The profound deficiency in plasminogen is like building a structure impervious to future demolition – it’s designed to persist.

The elemental data confirms it’s not just protein; it’s a hybrid material our bodies are forced to make but not equipped to clear.”

This holds a significant health implication. The researchers note that the formation of such persistent, obstructing material in blood vessels, particularly if in the microvasculature, will lead to chronic oxygen lack, organ damage, pain, exhaustion, and cascades of inflammatory pathology.

The study concludes that AICs anomalous intravascular casts, “provide a mechanistically coherent explanation for persistent vascular obstruction, impaired tissue perfusion, inflammation, and a broad spectrum of acute and chronic organ dysfunction.”

A Call for Urgent Investigation:

The paper highlights the covid injections as a crucial research direction:

“If spike protein were demonstrated to provoke anomalous intravascular casts, this would raise serious implications not only for covid pathophysiology but also for genetic platforms that induce sustained host manufacture of spike protein, making it imperative that this potential association be rigorously investigated.”