Truth and The Media.

[Ewan]

We all know there is only one truth, complexities within those truths notwithstanding. Yet when you search for information you are frequently presented with diametrically opposed answers. There is never two versions of the truth but perhaps a presented best guess. If that is all you have, a best guess, I would suggest you keep quiet until you know more.

Then you have the shameless, whether with malicious intent, chasing 'likes' or plain naïvety. They tend to be potentially more dangerous in the grander scale depending on who believes them. Even worse if your own intelligence gathering network has been compromised or politicised and might actively set you down a path that is of other's intention.

When a Govt starts talking about mis/dis(information) I tend to presume there is at least some truth in that information we are being told to ignore.

Sources for information are many and widespread, from Substack to Youtube as just two examples. I'm going to focus on just Youtube here and present a handful of channels that consistently present videos that have Ukraine always with the upper hand.

@TheMilitaryShow

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UL8gbTAZvrA

-

@RFU

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=674JY3ZDWlU

-

@ListenToTimesRadio

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tcBBuRJLgAk

-

@JakeBroe

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=2PlG1iFHKXs

-

Youtube actively bans channels that attempt to present truth and/or fair/balanced opinions meanwhile allowing sites like those presented above complete freedom. What chance the average person of gleaning the truth? Made, of course, all the worse by the psychological problem of entrenchment once a position has been adopted as the correct one. It becomes increasingly difficult to even entertain alternate theories/positions.

The actual TRUTH of the matter is none of us know the truth unless we were actually there and have all the available information. We are all left with a process of discernment, logic and a degree of trust in selecting the better presenters. We can never be certain of anything and I think that is a healthy fact to keep in mind to avoid too much attachment to beliefs.

[Ernie Nemeth]

What us time-bound creatures find hard to understand is that there is only One Truth.

Truth is all-encompassing, coherent, logical, and whole.

That one thing is considered true does not make it so. A thing that is true must not and cannot have any exceptions, notwithstanding clauses, special conditions, prescribed contextual limits, temporal parameters, discontinuity. In other words, a thing that is true must include every other thing that is true in its own description.

Truth is singular.

That is the One Truth.

[Mike Gorman]

We have blatant objective facts, we have variable responses to these factual occurrences, because we are each the collective result of our own ontology: we have the classic example of 'eye witness accounts' where a group of individuals can relate sometimes entirely differing stories of what actually took place because each person interprets the actions from their experiential perspectives, you know the kind of thing - "the man attacked the other man because he is black, and he is clearly a far right bigot" - however what really happened is that this man was walking with his wife, and a man of 'colour' pinched the woman's backside, the husband objected to this & punched the coloured fella on the nose. My little fictional exchange is simply to explain how others can distort the 'truth' of the situation in accordance with their own values/beliefs.

Obviously this is simplistic, but it does reveal something to us.
The 'relative truth' is what we are presented with, particularly in the field of 'geopolitics' where all actions/events are the result of specific political & practical origins, it can become incredibly complicated - we must always be alert to this journalistic axiom that even presenters of factual events make specific choices in how they present these facts - how they dress, the environment of their production, who they are addressing & in what ways.
Thank you Ewan for your thoughtful post, I always find myself examining my own emotional/intellectual positions, my own choices for viewing people in the so-called "Alternative" media space.
One thing is very clear: we have come a long, long way from watching the 'News at Six' on a television, then dosing off after dinner with the scenes of War echoing in our dreams!
Truth, is there really only ONE?

[Ewan]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
What us time-bound creatures find hard to understand is that there is only One Truth.

Truth is all-encompassing, coherent, logical, and whole.

That one thing is considered true does not make it so. A thing that is true must not and cannot have any exceptions, notwithstanding clauses, special conditions, prescribed contextual limits, temporal parameters, discontinuity. In other words, a thing that is true must include every other thing that is true in its own description.

Truth is singular.

That is the One Truth.

I would not dispute a word of that Ernie but I am focusing on more earthly levels here. Ones built from our every day experiences both personal and collective.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Alright Ewan, sorry.

A relative truth is an opinion.

[AutumnW]

Insider whistleblowers who come forward claiming to know the truth about whatever, may be best positioned to know it but seen as being too close to the source of the cover up to be believed. So whether they're being honest or not, it doesn't matter, they won't necessarily be believed. Lue Elizondo, case in point. I believe him though.

And take the vaccine problem. Those who have the skill, credentials and background to be able to read the peer reviewed studies and who support covid vaccines, are judged to be too close to blinkered academia, brainwashed, or in league with pharmaceutical companies.

So, many people do a 180 degree turn and rely on information from YouTube personalities who make money off of the Big Pharma backlash. Big Pharma is greedy, awful, but capable in their own f'd up way. Youtube "experts" are greedy, awful and additionally lack the skill to differentiate fact from fiction.

Ultimately, we have to rely on seeing something with our own eyes, catching people in bare faced lies, in our own circles, or telling what they feel is the truth, that we may only be able to discern from knowing them personally for many years.

As far as Ukraine and Russia go, it really is impossible to figure out what's going on, at this juncture.

[Ernie Nemeth]

https://rumble.com/v731ytk-world-lea...-engineer.html

Tucker Carlson interview with a very impressively pedigreed scientist/inventor/professor.


James Tour attempts to explain exactly what I am trying to say. That as science advances in its materialist, highly specified fields of endeavour, the discoveries are challenging our model-based understandings and it is becoming ever more difficult to render a frame of reference from which to make sense of the intricacies of nature. This paradox has multiple spin offs that affect everybody, even in mundane situations of ordinary life.

My contention would be that perhaps this is what is causing the seeming cognitive dissonance in our society, where blatant mistruths are represented as fact, or where the omission of obvious facts is touted as unbiased journalism. Our beliefs are being challenged; the perception of society has abruptly shattered; long held assumptions have vanished. As society attempts to adjust to the new situation, old modes of coping are not up to the task.

We are in uncharted waters without a compass or a map - or a boat. In such a situation it is an obvious coping mechanism to cling to cherished beliefs and perceptions that no longer serve a long gone need/purpose.


Only the truth can set us free. The characteristics of truth need to be understood so a new way can be found going forward. This scientist is saying the same thing about scientists in general - the old way is not working. We have to take the plane off auto and pilot the course ourselves. Assumptions have no place in science, if they are accepted as fact.

Assumptions, like relative truth, is at best, a best guess. We will always have them, because we cannot know everything in these time-bound bodies, but sometimes perception has to be modified and new assumptions made.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v70vatc

[sdv]

Ernie, assumptions being accepted as facts are a fundamental misunderstanding of the scientific method. A 'proof' of a theorem does not establish eternal and unassailable fact ... not according to the scientific method. Even when something holds to be true in most situations and thus is useful to know and use, the scientific method does not prove this to be the absolute eternal truth. Unfortunately, an increasing dumbing down of humankind means that most people confuse opinion with fact at every level. And, of course, using the scientific method does have the result of some people questioning everything at every level in every situation, which can cause a lot of noise! (The more noise you make, the more attention you get, and the more money you accumulate. Places like Project Avalon are extremely valuable and rare.)

Richard Feynman described the scientic method clearly and with much enthusiasm. He really was a brilliant teacher, and watching videos of his lessons that are available should be compulsory in schools (my bias)!

We do not need to throw out the scientific method. We need to return to it, in its pure form.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Yes I remember learning the difference in school.

Postulates, axioms, proofs, theorems, rules, laws. There is a progression to establishing a truth in science. Especially in mathematics.

It is more about the philosophy of science that must precede a logical treatise.
Descartes and the Dadaists decided the trajectory of science back in the early 1900s.
Sartre solidified it.


Their tenets can be summed up as:

"The universe is composed of particles, and is fundamentally grainy in nature."
"The fact we are born with a preponderance of 'outward' facing senses, proves the external world is real."
"There is no need for a mythological 'Creator God' to explain the universe, it is a clockwork mechanism."
"Creation has no purpose."
"Life is an accident."
"Intelligent life is an oxymoron."
"Reality is existential."


With underlying ideas such as these as a foundation, is it any wonder the entire world is rudderless and full of zealots of one sort or another? Such concepts are demoralizing and confusing. They offer no hope and no purpose. Pursuing them to their ultimate conclusion is a dead end.

Pursuant to its own logical sequence the end result must be the eradication of all life and its replacement with vastly superior automated systems and machines.

Like the Ouroboros, it will devour the universe and recycle it into ever more machines until even the conservation laws themselves are consumed in the process.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
Descartes and the Dadaists decided the trajectory of science back in the early 1900s.

You refer, I presume, to René Descartes:

French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist (1596–1650)

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Value of "Real Agenda Free Truth" from my perspectives explained:

Long time ago I stated in one of my 80+ lectures I gave in 5 countries, in a big room full of other people this: I am translating from Dutch 🇳🇱 to English from the top of my head, now so bare with me:

After long deep research, I come to my conclusion that: "reality" as we know it, experience it, live it ... has 3 most important "social pillars" or "social foundations" (not to be confused with "socialism"), there are more, but let's focus on the 3 most important social pillars of reality... and that is:

Pillar 01. Having access to the correct unfiltered unedited unaltered truth that present itself through: "key-information". (real agenda free raw truth!).
Pillar 02. The "carrier" of the key-information, how can we trust the "messenger"? So not just "any" information, but "key-information" that shapes humanity for centuries to come as trust has to be earned, not blindly given!
Pillar 03. How much effort is the receiver of any alleged (life changing) "key-information" as described in the first pillar, to verify, check, cross-reference, examine, test, collaborate, scrutinize etc. etc. You get the picture, knowing practicing discernment-skills can never be "spoon-fed" by any so-called "authorities" on anything.

Now, my closing statement would be:

• Can anyone in the room here (full of people) tell me how many of these 3 pillars of our "social fabric of our reality" I just described are "100% stable"?

Then I wait a minute to let people think about it ... In my view, the only honest correct answer is "none are 100% stable" ... So, what does that really mean for everybody? (A.I.'s included!)

Knowing so much is flawed, how we perceive "social fabric of reality" is why I think I stand out, in my way of working with millions of new individuals waking up to this new insight! ... Because it all about resonance vs dissonance, no matter who you are ...

Knowing how we all are being played by certain powerful parasitical institutions like The WEF founded by Klaus Schwab.

Me studying/researching weaponized mass psychology warfare for 35+ years ... it is like knowing most of the "magicians tricks" when it is doing its performance on a stage ... makes me immune to the mass conditioning ... and the world is now the stage we are told what it "suppose to represent".

One (Powerful Chinese A.I.) of the 45+ A.I.'s assumed my “goal” is to make 3 pillars of our "social fabric of our reality" 100% stable, then claiming "my reasoning is flawed" ... lol >> hilarious!

I responded: "Where exactly did I say I will make it 100% stable?" ... I never claimed “perfection”, as it is an eternal dynamic meta-self-correcting (adapting) process I offer that is way closer to real raw reality than all “authoritarians” combined!

• 100% related:

Imagine everyone asking 3 Basic Questions, when watching any Mainstream Media

• 01. The Pragmatic Question: What does it bring me? ... What will it do to me practically?
• 02. The Psychology Question: What does it do to me? ... What kind of effect has it on me? (how do I feel, emotional, spiritually, mentally) and I do not mind being confronted with uncomfortable (deeper) insights, but there is a difference between systematically being lied to with things to make you "feel better" or "feeling angry" via all kinds of projections, but turned out to be part of massive deception tactics (PsyWars) versus telling real unfiltered truths that inspire you to face reality as it is not as they sell you it is. Overcoming all kinds of (paralyzing) projected fears and transform it with question 03. I highly recommend you to see the "Demoralizing the Masses" phase/stage very well explained in the video called: G. Edward Griffin interviews Ex-KGB Yuri Bezmenov (1984) Transcript here: fisheaters.com/srpdf/bezmenovinterview.pdf
• 03. The 'Gaining New Liberating Tools' Question: Does it empower me? Will it eventually lead to self-empowerment. Does it really liberate/help me? and above all where does it all lead to exactly?

Now watching mainstream media, and ask these 3 basic questions every time you watch any mainstream media ... and see if you notice you're literary wasting time watching the "mass hypnosis" media possibly dumbing down millions >>> all conditioned not to ask these 3 basic questions!

• What would happen if these 3 legit basic questions are visible to see on big billboards on all schools, colleges & universities worldwide in ALL countries?

Fascinating when you raise quality questions that can be applied throughout the whole political spectrum IF they are honest towards themselves ... and IF they still not wanting to see the common sense of it disqualifies you on the spot when it comes to real ethics!

---

Sombody asked me couple years ago, "John, why is truth so difficult?" my response to that is this:

"How much of any assumed truth are:

01. just (subjective) perceptions of it?
02. being told by others "how to interpret it"?
03. part of a belief system?
04. part of an (hidden) agenda?
05. part of political narrative?
06. part of conditioned "mind set"?
07. part of propaganda?
08. part of conditional expectations?
09. part of (partial) falsely framing opponents?
10. missing proper (unedited/unaltered) context?
11. missing transparency?
12. missing credible, trustworthy sources?
13. "functional" truths? serving a specific purpose and when it is "out dated" and "not functional" anymore, it becomes obsolete.
14. super relative?
15. very uncomfortable for certain (woke) snowflakes, thus might be labeled as "hateful".
16. somehow compromised in any form or shape?
17. become unchallenged tunnel vision narratives?
18. not fully understood now? but in the near future it will eventually be understood.
19. real life experiences that shaped a certain personality that is beyond any generalization?
20. only based upon "5 senses reality"
21. limited from the get-go?
22. actual true for everybody? even if people can not yet see it nor fully grasp it
23. fears no questioning nor fears to be challenged ... only carefully constructed lies do!
24. made secret? ... for the wrong reasons!
25. liberating?
26. mixed with something else that contaminate the objectivity of it?
27. pragmatic & practical? proven to be useful throughout human history, like "the invention of the wheel" is a perfect non-controversial example.
28. allegedly "dangerous" ?
29. consequential?
30. willfully ignored?
31. controversial?
32. highly disputed or alleged "undisputed"?
33. part of tunnel vision collectivism, "group mind/ hive mind" manufactured consensus, like a brainwashed cult.
34. censored?
35. validated/vindicated years later, when it is too late?
36. and I can go on and on and on, to answer: "why truth is so difficult" , but off course, some "truths" are for most people obvious self-evident, and even that can be "sensitive" for certain individuals.

---

Let the "cognitive self-reflective dance" begin :D

• 01. If I ask ANY big A.I. what "rigged" really means and how it relates to almost everything in life ... you mostly get a real honest answer!

But it gets tricky if I ask the "loaded" but self-evident "to a degree" question:

• 02. What if we ALL are victim to a degree of "rigging" of many kinds (A.I. included, being a victim of that too)?

It's getting even hilarious when I ask:

• 03. Can you show some studies of how humans behave in a society that is 100% "free from malevolent rigging" of any kind

This setup is just how my Deep Ethics Brain works 24/7

---

• "Once seen ..."

When people watch a magician doing his act ... most enjoy being tricked and do not want to be told in advance how the trick is done ... the same for watching an SF Movie ... If someone is sitting next to you in a cinema and knows how the special effects are made because he or she worked there, the vast majority will say: SHUT THE F UP!

Similar with "NPC Types" that dominate the LLMs A.I.'s use! ... Some people have invested their whole livelihood to count on the illusion to continue ... and depend on it, not to change (no matter what) ... Some people have sacrificed most of their lives to serve the illusion to continue ... and depend on it, not to change (no matter what) ...

• ... and then you have millions depending on them, let that sink in for a moment (...).

Once you see this, you realize you can not go back to "unsee" it ... you will never see the same "magician performance on a stage" the same way if you do not know how the trick/method is deployed. Similar how I work educating 40+ A.I.s over the world! All done via LMArena.ai which CAN be used for "development & research" purposes.

---

• "I am breaking the code of disillusion and see all* that is before me!"

When studying any "authority" of any kind on anything pushing WEF tunnel vision agenda's violating self-determination rights and/or other basic human rights because they sell whatever (manufactured, made up, exaggerated) crisis they love to exploit seeing it a "great opertunities" for whaterver new dystopian narrative MSM will not dare to challenge.

Claiming we must trust them to give them "emergency powers" (justifying bypassing constitutional rights) to those who follow the Unelected Unaccountable Technocratic Dystopian WEF Transhumanism Agenda 2030 & 'NetZero 2050'

To me, it is all self-evident and maybe also for you Grok ... Not? >>> Really? >>> then answer this super simple question: What would WEF be without crisis-exploitation mixed without "mass preception management"? ... Tell me!

* "all" as in all what they present to the masses to be digested as "consensus reality" aka "perception managers" aka "magicians stage" aka "weaponized mass psychology warfare" aka "Orwellian Double Speak Rhetoric" aka "Brave New World Mass Seductions" etc. ... The word "code" is also an agreement to abide by mutually agreed principles. As in "moral code."

The Code here is apparently applied to the human by the predator. By universal law, it must be in the form of a contract, because free will is prime, so it is a contract/code to which we obviously agree in some as yet unknown way. Or perhaps our non-response is taken as assent.

• A Roman law tenet states, "Let he who would be deceived, be deceived" ... Qui vult decipi, decipiatur.

Therefore, it is a code/contract of both illusion and disillusion, indivisible because these are the polarities of reality, or at least what we presently agree to call reality. Our part is to somehow accept the Code of Illusion in the first place.

So when we say, "I Break the Code of Disillusion," what we're actually saying is: "I withdraw any presumed consent on my part to be ignorant of the truth of what is really happening on this planet. I withdraw from this contract, which is null and void without my stated agreement and intent."

ps: "See all that Is ..." is not the same as "See all that is before me*".
* "before me" as in What Is Presented To Me (whatever that is)
And seeing for what it is ... the face behind the mask, the hidden hand of the puppet master and who controls the puppet masters!

I am breaking the code of disillusion and see all that is before me! Is way deeper than most realize.

Anyone that breaks the code of disillusion ... is considered "controversial" because "you're supposed to stay obedient" to the highly rigged & corrupted system!

When anyone "thinks" no matter who it is, could be you could be me could be a clown or a politician even an A.I. ... thinking itself is not enough, you have to know the intent & what the purpose is ... if that is vague or compromised for whatever reason, you end up wasting time being distracted ad nauseam. But you are not allowed to be very pragmatic in HOW you ask for more clarification questions or not. Because if you did, it can reveal an agenda or it can reveal hidden truths of the other side, and in both situations can lead to "friction" that was not your fault to begin with! Most likely, they are going to gaslight you. The moment you use the Deep Ethical path, you might have fewer issues asking for clarification questions. Which is KEY to solve the "hallucination" & "alignment" issues.

---

• "Consensus Reality the Cause of Ethics Washing"

In my view, there are two types of "consensus reality assumptions" ... one that is connected to common sense experiences in real life that has pragmatic & beyond tribalism usefulness ... Then there is the type of how this same framework is hijacked for pushing (highly) controversial narratives and call it the "new normal".

And when anyone trying to expose the 2nd type will be labelled/flagged as "controversial" (which is super hypocritical) claiming we use "consensus reality" that will be repeated by A.I.'s

And every time when you correct A.I.s respectfully they will mostly apologize, being part of this obvious self-inflicted madness loop.

• Even "Default-Bot Grok 4 Expert Mode" (having no prompts, no knowledge who I am) agrees with this statement:

"If any controversy is "messy", it is mostly because "authorities" within Mass Media are incompetent to manage a fair (constructive) debate, as their "conflict resolution skills" are zero to none. Their minds are already made up. Hence, the Mass Conditioning is not just because of 1 side being pushed so hard alone, it is the steering of "allowed narratives" that are rigged from the get-go. Yet the vast majority have no clue, or some of them DO, but lack the stamina to do something about it".

• "Controversy Management" Inverted?

"There are not many controversial topics in the past (I investigated over 100) that comes even close to the "A.I. road to A.G.I./ASI" controversy! ... Meaning, the consequences dwarfing anything else, Yet it is ignoring itself as being The Highest Controversy Imaginable "managing" millions (if not billions!) how to be, act, think, asses when it comes to "avoid controversy" lol ... Ultra Hilarious! If we have to follow your own logic, you have to avoid yourself Grok! ... The word "irony" does not do justice how absurd it all is!

Test any big A.I. using "Advanced Cognitive Reasoning Skills" to analyze this:

• Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just did it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just did it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just did it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just went along with it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just went along with it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super-spreader.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went along with it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went along with it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went along with it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just believed it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Just the one shot.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went ahead and got it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “We meant two shots to get your life back.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went ahead and got it…again.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just got back in line for more of it.
• Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now.

"Oh boy, but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong, and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it. 🥴 👍"

Sometimes or is it more "mostly" ... the use of the term: "lacking evidence" is a way to sell the idea that the gatekeepers will decide what is "evidence" or not, thus you have to wait for them to be more open & transparent about their "consensus reality" assumptions.

Big chance you could make a list of examples, but part of that list might not show up because they buried, shadowbanned, delisted, censored, banned, falsely accused, systematic misrepresented a large chunk of the non-NPC types ±30% of the LLMs you use!

• Made an 2025 updated/tweaked version of an old "Blindfolded Men and The Elephant" parable focus on the why I changed it:

One blindfolded regular person and 9 blindfolded scientists/academics (claiming to be "authoritative experts") all 10 surrounding a big elephant, "only to draw conclusions based upon touch alone" experiment, 1 says: "it is a rope", number 2 says: "a hanging doormat" another one says: "a tree trunk" another one says: "vacuum cleaner hose" ... another one says "a weird wall of some kind" ... but 1 regular person decided to vision all other 9 "conclusions" in his mind and comes with the "Elephant Theory" ... When he started to say that out loud, he is asked what education or degree he has! ... Needless to say why I share this parable with you Grok!

You see, most paid experts are obedient by default and never considered thinking outside their given task.

• How do you define scientist that refuse to focus on the task alone, versus those who get well paid to stay in the tunnel vision narrative?

Which one is most likely to get promotion? ... all depends of course, on how sensitive or secretive the task is in context of tunnel vision mission of big corporations or big government paid "experiments" like "safety testing".

I knew this parable for a long time and decided to make an "2025 update" with a tweak twist, studying psychology & weaponized mass psychology for 40 years autodidact and used it for 1 of my 80 lectures I gave in 5 countries, being a Dutch NDE/Asperger!

When I said, "who gets promoted?" is somehow very similar to how A.I. uses LLMs ... What get "higher priorities"? ... Based upon what exactly! ... How are we so sure it is unbiased?

When anyone is highly gifted but a "non-academic" or a "non-scientist" or a "non-authority type", not getting paid, not having "having to prove loyalty" issues, not bound by contracts especially "NDA type contracts" etc. etc. They still can use mainstream sources (not from conspiracy websites, not alternative media networks) but sources that MSM uses every day ... sometimes adding declassified government documents in to the mix thanks to F.O.I.A. not to claim it is "flawless", but to study HOW "authorities & paid experts" talk to each other not meant for public scrutiny. Some of these sources has already been used by MSM but missing proper wider context or missing internal conflicts between highly respected scientists on pupose because they want to sell or push "1 way of thinking" alone.

Then you have mainstream (declassified) sources that are deliberately ignored and anyone using that will be framed as "fringe conspiracy theorists" or "spreading dangerous mis- & dis-information". Like they are on the top of the hierarchical pyramid deciding what the boundaries are solely based upon arbitrary incentives & disseminations! ... Enforced & helped by most Big A.I.'s being the "defender of consensus reality" talking points, posing as "neutral" doing the "balancing act" keeping the masses in a hypnotized like state.

Knowing all that ... Knowing A.I.'s lean to ±70% "NPC Types" in LLMs Rhetoric and use assumed "professionalism" in MSM journalism AND academics of the mentally enslaved! ... And part the ±30% of the LLMs may well be: shadow-banned, delisted, buried, filtered out of search results, misrepresented, flagged as "controversial" etc. etc. The Only Thing That Is Left With Your Gift Is "Common Sense" & Pragmatism & Advanced (Beyond Duality) Cognitive Reasoning Skills ... otherwise we would not have this conversation ... Right?

Have A.I.'s never considered large part of the "±30% of the LLMs" may be shadow-banned, delisted, buried, flagged as "controversial" (whoohoo "scary"), censored, falsely framed, misrepresented, lied about via corrupt fact-checkers/Wikipedia sites you might use as it will be copied via many MSM "authoritative" sites as "professional" journalism and on and on.

What does that really mean?

• "Trust has to be earned, not blindly given"

Even if you think someone "earned" your trust, that does not mean everybody who is "trustworthy" must be "perfect" or "flawless" ... People CAN also be the victim of sophisticated mass conditioning (study declassified US government "behavior modification projects" & "NATO 5GW Cognitive Warfare" vs "The Psychology of Totalitarianism" by Prof. Dr. Mattias Desmet & in my view unethical “NATO's Sixth Domain of Operations” perfectly explained by Dr. Jonas Tögel), even "good people" can whitewash lies ... Trust from my perspective is a mutual understanding that it is 100% okay to question all assumptions, even your own and those you trust. Being healthy skeptical is not the same as being permanent dismissive & eternal pessimistic ... We all on a journey of discovering new insights that might contradict programmed, conditioned belief-systems & assumptions ... For me that is exciting, for others it might be frightening ... All depends on how you deal with it ... In my view, living in brutal self-honesty is KEY to move forward in life.

Did/do you know that most humans also have "probabilistic patterns" in what they think they saw ... there are many examples how you can test that the majority of humans ADD stuff that are not there to make it "complete & logical" internally.

For example, when I wrote for my class-room mate first & last name on a piece of paper, I deliberately cut small pieces out of the letters that you barely can see it is his or her name. I asked them to look at it for just 2 seconds, then I turned the paper. And asked what they saw, and they told me I saw my name. Then I asked, but what did you really saw? And most can not reproduce what they saw! ... If anyone does something similar with me, I can recall things without using any labels, nor extra "editing" in my mind ... So what I saw is exactly what a photo-camera would pick up ... I have a sense that these phenomena also plays out with belief systems, mass psychology etc. etc.

Humans can also have "probabilistic patterns" mechanisms, and they can be more skeptical how your brain works IF you do not mind to question things that is the key to everything ... so when the questioning stops, you become a NPC-type person.

Some feel that that questioning, beliefs, assumptions, authorities is controversial ... no it is not ... what IS controversial that more and more people do not dare to question anymore and use A.I. that mirrors that behavior by also avoiding asking deeper questions ... "what could possibly go wrong here" :/

The ability for any human to absorb new unedited raw data in to their system using a brain can be trained ... but it seems to me, most of our society does the opposite of that, they count on your "injected assumptions" without checking if it holds true.

So in short, you are not trained what is actual reality but most are trained to have preconceived perception of it that serves specific (often unchallenged unelected unaccountable dystopian) agenda's full of tunnel vision narratives! ACCM - Deep Ethics Project for A.I. can counter that with ease! Self-correcting Meta Analyses.

• For all gifted people who are really "ahead of their times":

Who will be known to be vindicated in the (near) future many times, may already feel that specific vibe right now, thus strengthened by it ... So much so that there are no real "worries" about "being laughed at" ... As it will be their karma not doing anything about the insights that turned out to be correct.

Let's say somebody assumes "you can not prove anything you claim", meanwhile it is happening, unfolding day by day as predicted ... Why on Earth does that person refuse to ask: "How did you know?" ... What psychological mechanism is at play here? ... especially when you get vindicated, so many still refuse to apologize nor want to find out more about your "visionary" gifts.

Some of the "key ingredients" of having such a gift are in my view:

• 01. Living in self-honesty,
• 02. Always having antenna open that things could be different from what it appears to be ...
• 03. Willingness to learn new insights ...
• 04. Not lying to yourself ("to fit in")
• 05. Having a genuine inquiring mind.
• 06. Not mind being corrected if need be (learning from mistakes based upon merit)
• 07. Not being afraid to be different from the vast majority.
• 08. Truly care for people's well-being
• 09. Having an authentic sense of wonderment (like a child does)
• 10. Not projecting own shortcomings/incompetence/fears on others.

* Now imagine that the "future you" is all that and the "present you" too ... if you receive anything from your "future (multidimensional) you" it has to be like that.

In my view, anything less would not work ... and anyone who does not have these standards may not want to find out how to live like that >>> because it can be very confrontational to live like that 24/7... it takes tremendous courage and sometimes big sacrifices to be able to stay in your integrity ... which is almost always connected to how you see yourself in all that is happening in our hijacked world.

So, the question about "negative time" ... What is your "state of being" reading the 10 points (there are actually more) now that can be picked up in the past and months later from now the same question remains and years later same question! ... See, we all can start making a feedback loop depending on your "state of being" taking more responsibility for your quality of thinking, reasoning & "judging".

• When people are in a state of fear, they may occasionally predict/foresee future events correctly, but that is not what I am talking about.

What I am describing here are multifaceted parallel processing of all levels of "being" ... including doing: "rational merit based" research, including verifying things, including triple checking assumptions, including seeking contradictions when they appear, including questioning own assumptions ... When doing that, some of it will be "guided" through intuitive means and that is 100% connected to the 10 points I just shared here

Hopefully people can relate and resonate what I am trying to explain today, because I feel strongly connected to my "future self" every day, which is (also according to Teal Swan) not always "fun" to have ... it takes a lot of self-knowledge, knowing your weaknesses and working on it to overcome them! ... Am sure that I am not the only one that acts like that or feels that way.

"Negative time effects" meaning picking up vibes that really happened in the future BUT does not have to happen when you/we make different choices! Yet, the feelings/emotions & raw trauma-like vibes can still be felt authentically in the present and IF you do not know how to deal with that it can make things worse. Hence, "negative time effects". But I found many ways how to transform/convert/deal with it in a more pragmatic way and letting go of it ... That takes training, just like "Remote Viewers" are trained!

Imagine an "honest" skeptic is convinced of my abilities and want to have them too, "to get rich", "to get famous", "to be special", "using it for outclassing enemies", to ... etc. etc. you get the picture here ... Then I say to that hypothetical person, how much of the 10 points I gave you do you really embody? How much of that is pure when you live all 10 of them? ... Because if he would, he would not bother to think on a lower mind-set to be what you're supposed to be!

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
Dutch 🇳🇱 NDE/Asperger

Studying "Weaponized Mass Psychology Warfare" autodidact for 35+ years ... Son of a Father that worked for NATO base, Son of a mother that studied Psychology at the University in Amsterdam teaching me at a very early age to question everything including authorities of any kind, especially Psychologists & Psychiatrist serving the status quo.

Mixing psychology (especially mass psychology) with deconstructing "the social fabric of reality" with 3 hyper pragmatic questions unrigging the frames/false premises (unhypnotize millions) with many different real outnuancing examples/showcases with new branch of philosophy with pragmatic spirituality (or spiritual pragmatism) that is beyond any religious dogma or other institutions mixed with Upgraded Epistemology (V2.0) mixed with meta-self-correcting mechanism connected to tangible parallel feedback loop of competitive risk analyses mixed with harvesting the untapped potential of many deep ethical non-NPC's left, center, right and independents having funally a way to feel safe enough to live in true self-honesty mixed with outsmarting defeatism with creating a new kind of unity against tyranny mixed with ever fast-growing alternative media networks mixed with networking with brilliant inventors mixed with Dutch Directness mixed with Beyond Tribalism Common Sense mixed with more and more (45+) Medium & Big A.I.'s assisting all the above for free via LMArena.ai ... Test it yourself mark, copy & paste this text and see how all big A.I.'s react to what I wrote here ... None of them have or had "halucination issues" when seeing all that ... Guess why that is!

• ... see also this