The Dr Dan Burisch case, and its relevance today.

[p+52]

I want to formally acknowledge Szabolcs Juhasz, who hosts the Hungarian YouTube channel UFO Disclosure Hungary, for what is genuinely one of the most rigorous and intellectually honest interviews I’ve participated in on the Dan Burisch case.

Our one-on-one conversation ran over two and a half hours, but what elevates this interview far beyond a standard discussion is Szabolcs’ painstaking editorial discipline. Rather than allowing claims to stand on rhetoric alone, he methodically inserts the original contextual source clips, historical footage, and corroborating references precisely at the moments they matter. The result is not persuasion by assertion—but persuasion by structure, continuity, and evidence.

This interview represents the culmination of 14 years of sustained research on my part into the Burisch narrative—its science, its contradictions, its corroborations, and its uncomfortable implications. What emerges here is not a defense of a man, but a re-examination of a case that was prematurely dismissed, often without the depth of review it demanded.

For researchers who have long rejected the Burisch story, I would argue this interview functions as a stress test: not asking you to believe—but asking you to reassess. When the material is laid out sequentially, sourced, and cross-referenced, the case becomes far more resilient than critics may remember.

This is not casual viewing. It is a dense, evidence-rich compendium dealing with disclosure, human–non-human interaction, intelligence community dynamics, and the unsettling possibility that elements of the phenomenon intersect with future timelines and human continuity.

Watch it in one sitting if you can. Absorb it in sections if you must. But if you consider yourself serious about UFO research, do not bypass this record. Some cases don’t fade because they’re false —they fade because they were too disruptive to be handled correctly the first time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZQZGDI3dVo

The following is the response from Szabolcs Juhasz thanking me for the interview:

"Brian Jackson Thank you for your thoughtful and generous words, Brian!
It truly means a lot coming from someone who has spent so many years seriously examining this case.

My goal was never to persuade, but to present the material as accurately, transparently, and responsibly as possible—so viewers can form their own conclusions.

I’m grateful for your trust, your time, and for allowing this conversation to unfold in depth. I actually recommend watching this interview at least three times, and here’s why.

I typically end up watching my own interviews seven times:
once during the initial review, again while taking notes, a third time during editing, a fourth while translating, a fifth while subtitling, a sixth to double-check everything, and finally during the YouTube premiere.

Even though I was already familiar with this case, I can honestly say that after the seventh viewing, I was still learning new details. There is simply so much depth, context, and layered information here.

That’s why I genuinely believe this is one of the most complex—and perhaps one of the most important—cases in the history of ufology, with an extraordinary amount of material and evidence to examine.

I’m extremely grateful that I had the opportunity to be part of presenting this case in greater depth.

Many thanks again Brian!

Sabi

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iZQZGDI3dVo

[Blastolabs]

How do you interpret the fact that Dan is able to violate his clearance and remain free and alive?
Or that he associates himself with the "Counter Intelligence Crowd" like Ellana Denan?

I know many scientists personally that worked outside of academia. None of them were fooled by COVID, they all were interested in the available evidence that supported the WHO's global pandemic announcement in March 2020.
There was no evidence at that time. There still is none.

[p+52]

The situation can be compared to a pressure relief valve on a high-powered steam engine. Majestic realizes the "steam" of the truth is becoming too volatile to contain completely, so they allow a specific valve—Dan Burisch—to release just enough information to prevent the entire system from exploding, all while keeping a hand firmly on the handle to shut it off if the flow becomes too great. As well, it is my belief that his long-term relationship with Mike McConnell would have afforded him some exclusivity in protection.