This is NOT normal! – HELP needed in exposing corrupt hospital practices!

[All is one]

In short:

Mysterious illness

For over 33 years I have been seriously ill with a mysterious sickness without getting any real help.

I knew I had some surgery done where they put something experimental in my head in 1991 at the Universitary hospital in Ghent, Belgium, Europe. This happened when I was 8 and since then I have been having a severe mysterious illness.

I was always told by the doctors of the hospital it must be my own fault that I was getting more ill by the day and that it thus had nothing to do with their trial.
After years of suffering and learning more about health, I had even more questions than answers. I contacted the hospital and several general practitioners (family doctors) to get concrete info on what was implanted in my head. Oddly enough, they refused to give any concrete details of what was exactly in my head. I thought this was strange, since I needed that info to know how I could improve my health.

Finally after many years I was able to look in to my medical file myself. To my shock I found that what I’d been told that supposed to have been in my head did not match what the MRI pictures actually showed was in my head. See the MRI pictures below.


Deep brain implants

Instead of some tiny seeds that should have been used to treat a supposed brain tumor, there were 2 deep brain implants visible in the middle of my brain on my MRI pictures. (The implants are the 2 black shapes one can see,in the middle of the brain area, on the first and second MRI picture.)

No wonder the hospital refused to disclose any concrete details of what was in my head making me ill. They knew their experiment was making me very ill and now they did not want to carry any responsibility.


Mysterious illness symptoms:

Since the operation I started suffering from:

● daily headaches/migraines
● diplopia (double vision)
● periods of paralysis that come and go (but can last anywhere from 3 hours to 8 years)
● etc.

These issues fluctuate between being latently present and being completely disabling.
Because of the fluctuation in the severity of the issues, I started considering the probability that the symptoms I experienced were due to an allergic reaction to the metals used for the implants. This because I’ve been allergic to metal since I was little (from earrings, bracelet, watches).

(According to the medical records I also had some inflammatory-rejection reaction to the implants one year after the implants were put. It’s approximately from then on that I started suffering from above issues which never completely disappeared.)

Tests that were done later (by another hospital) confirmed I'm really allergic to a whole range of metals.


Accountability

All this is crazy enough, but now I would like to know what exactly I have in my head that is keeping me ill.

Since the hospital and doctors really don’t want to help me —because they want to avoid any accountability — I’m looking to anyone and everyone for answers.

The logic behind this search is the following: man made brain implants don’t just appear out of nowhere. They were produced somewhere, bought from someone, made from specific metals, put in my head by someone etc. Somewhere someone must still have the correct info on this.

What I want to know:

1. What type of implants these are
2. Where these implants were produced: at what factory etc.
3. Brand name of the implants
4. What material they are made of
5. Any other concrete and detailed information
5. The availability of long term studies etc.

Based on some fleeting comments from my mum these things in my head were produced in America. I don’t know if that’s true, but maybe it can give some clue on where to look.

According to the hospital and all other sources I've researched, it is not possible to remove these implants without risking even more serious damage. This is why I hope to find out exactly what they are made out of in order to find the right food and life style, help etc. to mitigate the allergic reaction I have to these implants.


Anyway any and all help is welcome.


All is one

[Sue (Ayt)]

There is a lot of info on the subject of brain implants to be found on Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com

If might help to learn more if you do a search there for "Brain implants for brain tumors" and then select a date search range of the 90's to see what procedures were being actively used and researched back then.

Best Wishes

[abmqa]

Posted by All is one (here)
In short:

Mysterious illness

For over 33 years I have been seriously ill with a mysterious sickness without getting any real help.

I knew I had some surgery done where they put something experimental in my head in 1991 at the Universitary hospital in Ghent, Belgium, Europe. This happened when I was 8 and since then I have been having a severe mysterious illness.

I was always told by the doctors of the hospital it must be my own fault that I was getting more ill by the day and that it thus had nothing to do with their trial.
After years of suffering and learning more about health, I had even more questions than answers. I contacted the hospital and several general practitioners (family doctors) to get concrete info on what was implanted in my head. Oddly enough, they refused to give any concrete details of what was exactly in my head. I thought this was strange, since I needed that info to know how I could improve my health.

Finally after many years I was able to look in to my medical file myself. To my shock I found that what I’d been told that supposed to have been in my head did not match what the MRI pictures actually showed was in my head. See the MRI pictures in the following PDF files.

Attachment 56477
Attachment 56478


Deep brain implants (see above pdf files)

Instead of some tiny seeds that should have been used to treat a supposed brain tumor, there were 2 deep brain implants visible in the middle of my brain on my MRI pictures. (The implants are the 2 black shapes one can see on the MRI in the middle of the brain area.)

No wonder the hospital refused to disclose any concrete details of what was in my head making me ill. They knew their experiment was making me very ill and now they did not want to carry any responsibility.


Mysterious illness symptoms:

Since the operation I started suffering from:

● daily headaches/migraines
● diplopia (double vision)
● periods of paralysis that come and go (but can last anywhere from 3 hours to 8 years)
● etc.

These issues fluctuate between being latently present and being completely disabling.
Because of the fluctuation in the severity of the issues, I started considering the probability that the symptoms I experienced were due to an allergic reaction to the metals used for the implants. This because I’ve been allergic to metal since I was little (from earrings, bracelet, watches).

(According to the medical records I also had some inflammatory-rejection reaction to the implants one year after the implants were put. It’s approximately from then on that I started suffering from above issues which never completely disappeared.)


Accountability

All this is crazy enough, but now I would like to know what exactly I have in my head that is keeping me ill.

Since the hospital and doctors really don’t want to help me —because they want to avoid any accountability — I’m looking to anyone and everyone for answers.

The logic behind this search is the following: man made brain implants don’t just appear out of nowhere. They were produced somewhere, bought from someone, made from specific metals, put in my head by someone etc. Somewhere someone must still have the correct info on this.


What I want to know:

1. What type of implants these are
2. Where these implants were produced: at what factory etc.
3. Brand name of the implants
4. What material they are made of
5. Any other concrete and detailed information
5. The availability of long term studies etc.

Based on some fleeting comments from my mum these things in my head were produced in America. I don’t know if that’s true, but maybe it can give some clue on where to look.

According to the hospital and all other sources I've researched, it is not possible to remove these implants without risking even more serious damage. This is why I hope to find out exactly what they are made out of in order to find the right food and life style, help etc. to mitigate the allergic reaction I have to these implants.


Anyway any and all help is welcome.


All is one

Please visit the following link. It's about Ghent University in Belgium during 1991 and the implant studies conducted. https://share.google/aimode/f0bsFUCw9uSPprQZk

[All is one]

Thanks for the help and links.

THE PROBLEM: is that there are other implants in my brain than stated in my medical file & the hospital & doctors refuse to give me the concrete details of what has actually been implanted.

The information the hospital provided about what implants & therapy it supposed to have been don’t match the implants that are actually visible on the MRI’s of my brain.
⎨They also always told that they implanted just one seed/tiny implant when one can clearly see 2 larger implants on the MRI's (previous post).⎬

Supposingly the therapy I should have had was brachytherapy (with Titanium seeds). For this therapy they uses tiny radioactive brachy seeds/implants (in the past these were used to treat irregularly shaped tumors). For permanently implanted seeds they always used multiple seeds to get coverage of the whole brain tumor and because there are legal limits to how much radiation each seed may contain.

COMPARISON

Yet, the implants I have do not match the size of brachy seeds, neither do they match the amount of seeds and implantation pattern used in brachy therapy.

SIZE comparison between brachy seeds and the implants I got:

It’s important to know that the size of the implants almost match the size they have in reality. (When converting it using the appropriate scale factor.) Since these type of implants are normally made with some metals that are only slightly paramagnetic, like Titanium. See explanation: Magnetism of metals and it’s influence on MRI images

Magnetic properties of metals and their influence on MRI images

• Ferromagnetic metal objects on MRI: the object looks much bigger on an MRI than it is in reality.

• Paramagnetic metal objects on MRI: the object looks similar on an MRI to the size in reality (there can be a difference but not in the magnitude that ferromagnetic metals distort the depiction of the size of the object)

• Diamagnetic metal objects on MRI: the object looks smaller on an MRIi comparison to the size in reality

Explanation of radiation treatment field


CONCLUSION:
As explained above the implants are not the brachyseeds that they supposed to have been. The implants are way bigger. The amount of implants can not have been used to irradiate a round tumor – if ever there was one – for 2 implants don't create the correct radiation treatment field for a round tumor of ca 3 cm (or ca 1.18 inch).

To make this more visible, the pictures below show a top-and-bottom comparison beween my implants (top) and a tumor with brachy therapy implants. One can clearly see they always use multiple small implants for brachytherapy with permanent seed/tiny implants.

QUESTION:

So the question remains: What implants are in my head?

Image comparison between brachy seeds and my implants

[abmqa]

Posted by All is one (here)
Thanks for the help and links.

THE PROBLEM: is that there are other implants in my brain than stated in my medical file & the hospital & doctors refuse to give me the concrete details of what has actually been implanted.

The information the hospital provided about what implants & therapy it supposed to have been don’t match the implants that are actually visible on the MRI’s of my brain.
⎨They also always told that they implanted just one seed/tiny implant when one can clearly see 2 larger implants on the MRI's (previous post).⎬

Supposingly the therapy I should have had was brachytherapy (with Titanium seeds). For this therapy they uses tiny radioactive brachy seeds/implants (in the past these were used to treat irregularly shaped tumors). For permanently implanted seeds they always used multiple seeds to get coverage of the whole brain tumor and because there are legal limits to how much radiation each seed may contain.

COMPARISON

Yet, the implants I have do not match the size of brachy seeds, neither do they match the amount of seeds and implantation pattern used in brachy therapy.

SIZE comparison between brachy seeds and the implants I got:


Attachment 56485


It’s important to know that the size of the implants almost match the size they have in reality. (When converting it using the appropriate scale factor.) Since these type of implants are normally made with some metals that are only slightly paramagnetic, like Titanium. See explanation: Magnetism of metals and it’s influence on MRI images

Magnetic properties of metals and their influence on MRI images

• Ferromagnetic metal objects on MRI: the object looks much bigger on an MRI than it is in reality.

• Paramagnetic metal objects on MRI: the object looks similar on an MRI to the size in reality (there can be a difference but not in the magnitude that ferromagnetic metals distort the depiction of the size of the object)

• Diamagnetic metal objects on MRI: the object looks smaller on an MRIi comparison to the size in reality

Attachment 56486

Explanation of radiation treatment field

Attachment 56487
CONCLUSION:
As explained above the implants are not the brachyseeds that they supposed to have been. The implants are way bigger. The amount of implants can not have been used to irradiate a round tumor – if ever there was one – for 2 implants don't create the correct radiation treatment field for a round tumor of ca 3 cm (or ca 1.18 inch).

To make this more visible, the pictures below show a top-and-bottom comparison beween my implants (top) and a tumor with brachy therapy implants. One can clearly see they always use multiple small implants for brachytherapy with permanent seed/tiny implants.

QUESTION:

So the question remains: What implants are in my head?

Image comparison between brachy seeds and my implants
Attachment 56488

A review of the information about that University, shows that they conducted "research" exactly during the period, of which you were receiving treatment. We all know that not all research is transparent, much of it is conducted in secrecy.

I'm sorry to hear that perhaps something sinister happened to you. I hope that you find the answers and the solution to improve your health 🙏

[All is one]

@abmqa: Thank you for looking that up.
Can you also find the names of the experiments and what they were about?


UZ-Gent* is a universitary hospital, so it’s known that they do a lot of research.
Yet, it is not a place where people go to be experimented on.
The experimentation that they do is done on the basis of people who completely know what the experiment is about and who volunteer to participate.
If one agrees to a certain procedure they are not allowed to deliberately put something else in the patients body/brain.

In all cases the hospital is obliged to provide the info of the experiment to the participants, if they request any. They are not given permission to lie without restraint.
All their research should still be within the limits of Belgian and European legislation.

This also means any of their experiments should adhere to to ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki or Recommendation No. R (90) 3. Though non-binding themselves, these are upheld through general civil liability, criminal law, professional codes, and human rights protections, often shaping dedicated research regulations.


The Declaration of Helsinki and Recommendation No. R (90) 3 outline that:

1. Risk-benefit: Risks must never exceed participant benefits; welfare comes first. Experiments must be scientifically sound with prior animal/lab tests. All unnecessary suffering should be avoided

2. Consent, transparency & accountability: Full, truthful, understandable info must be provided proactively before and during the trial (with updates as needed) to enable free, revocable informed consent; additionally, complete details must be supplied upon participant request afterward for transparency and accountability

3. Comply with Ethics: ”Independent ethics committees—competent and conflict-free to protect subjects (external members, no conflicts with researchers or hospital)—must approve protocols beforehand and provide ongoing review/oversight

4. Screening: Screen for contraindications using scientifically sound methods before allowing participation.

5. Protection: Exclude/protect vulnerable groups (e.g., children, prisoners, incapacitated) with special safeguards

6. Compensation for harm: Provide compensation or free treatment for any harm from the trial—including lifelong damages or death—regardless of fault; uphold participant confidentiality; and transparently publish all results.


Yet, these principles and laws seem to be mocked of in favor of profits, nutty professors and corrupt institutions. In fact doctors and professors that prioritize the wellbeing of their patients often get fired because they do not generate enough revenue.

I think this is a very dangerous path that will not lead to any better healthcare or sustainable progress.

The ethical and moral dimension is missing—yet it is the very core of any strong foundation and of truly sustainable progress.

Anyway all help is welcome for I think in my case they did not comply with any of the above mentioned principles.


All is one

*UZ-Gent= Ghent University Hospital (Dutch: Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent; UZ Gent)

[Isserley]

You were 8 years old at the time of that medical procedure so it is a clear fact that your consent was not important but your parents were responsible for medical procedures and should have been familiar with them. So what do they say? Do they have, and if not, why don’t they have medical records from that time?
Who would allow experimentation on their child without any knowledge of what the process involves, what medical interventions? In fact, unfortunately many parents - covid madness has shown just that, not to talk about children's vaccines..

Doctors can’t "hide" your medical record details. This is not in line with the law and common sense and the only thing I can advise you now is to walk to the hospital with the lawyer.

Good luck.

[abmqa]

Posted by All is one (here)
@abmqa: Thank you for looking that up.
Can you also find the names of the experiments and what they were about?


UZ-Gent* is a universitary hospital, so it’s known that they do a lot of research.
Yet, it is not a place where people go to be experimented on.
The experimentation that they do is done on the basis of people who completely know what the experiment is about and who volunteer to participate.
If one agrees to a certain procedure they are not allowed to deliberately put something else in the patients body/brain.

In all cases the hospital is obliged to provide the info of the experiment to the participants, if they request any. They are not given permission to lie without restraint.
All their research should still be within the limits of Belgian and European legislation.

This also means any of their experiments should adhere to to ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki or Recommendation No. R (90) 3. Though non-binding themselves, these are upheld through general civil liability, criminal law, professional codes, and human rights protections, often shaping dedicated research regulations.


The Declaration of Helsinki and Recommendation No. R (90) 3 outline that:

1. Risk-benefit: Risks must never exceed participant benefits; welfare comes first. Experiments must be scientifically sound with prior animal/lab tests. All unnecessary suffering should be avoided

2. Consent, transparency & accountability: Full, truthful, understandable info must be provided proactively before and during the trial (with updates as needed) to enable free, revocable informed consent; additionally, complete details must be supplied upon participant request afterward for transparency and accountability

3. Comply with Ethics: ”Independent ethics committees—competent and conflict-free to protect subjects (external members, no conflicts with researchers or hospital)—must approve protocols beforehand and provide ongoing review/oversight

4. Screening: Screen for contraindications using scientifically sound methods before allowing participation.

5. Protection: Exclude/protect vulnerable groups (e.g., children, prisoners, incapacitated) with special safeguards

6. Compensation for harm: Provide compensation or free treatment for any harm from the trial—including lifelong damages or death—regardless of fault; uphold participant confidentiality; and transparently publish all results.


Yet, these principles and laws seem to be mocked of in favor of profits, nutty professors and corrupt institutions. In fact doctors and professors that prioritize the wellbeing of their patients often get fired because they do not generate enough revenue.

I think this is a very dangerous path that will not lead to any better healthcare or sustainable progress.

The ethical and moral dimension is missing—yet it is the very core of any strong foundation and of truly sustainable progress.

Anyway all help is welcome for I think in my case they did not comply with any of the above mentioned principles.


All is one

*UZ-Gent= Ghent University Hospital (Dutch: Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent; UZ Gent)

I'll do more research and see what names I can find:

As you can see below, they were still refining dosage and rates techniques during your treatment there. They did other studies, but this one aligns with what you have stated.

Hope this helps 🙏

In 1991, brachytherapy research and practice in Ghent were primarily associated with the Ghent University Hospital (GUH), particularly in the area of pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy. [1, 2]
Key points regarding brachytherapy in Ghent around 1991 include:

• PDR Brachytherapy Development: The Ghent University Hospital was an early adopter and significant contributor to the development and clinical implementation of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy, which uses a single radioactive source shuttled through catheters to maintain a constant average dose rate, an alternative to traditional low dose rate (LDR) techniques.

• Initial Experience: Research from Ghent, including work by M. van Eijkeren, reported on the "Initial PDR brachytherapy experience at Ghent, Belgium". This work was published later (e.g., in a 1994 journal issue), but the clinical practice and data collection were ongoing in the early 1990s.

• Clinical Applications: The techniques developed at Ghent were used in a variety of cancer treatments, including gynecological tumors, sarcomas, and head and neck tumors.

• Radiobiological Research: The work in Ghent contributed to the understanding and application of radiobiological principles in clinical practice, helping to resolve controversies in dose correction methods for different brachytherapy dose rates. [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

This period marked a transition in brachytherapy technology, moving toward more sophisticated afterloading machines and computer-assisted treatment planning, in which Ghent played a pioneering role. [2, 3, 7, 8, 9]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4879170/
[2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60301695021825
[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1622888/
[4] http://www.columbia.edu/~gr6/papers/red3.pdf
[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60301696004154
[6] https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...6030169290026E
[7] https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.100...40-85516-3_141
[8] https://www.termedia.pl/Internationa...16445,1,1.html
[9] https://www.jaypeedigital.com/eReade...9351529712/ch3

[All is one]

@ Isserley : Thak you for the answer.


No informed consent:

My parents did not agree to this.

Everything points to the professors lying about the severity of the brain tumor in order to get my parents in an irrational state of extreme fear. (So they’d accept anything the surgeon suggested.) They also exaggerated the risks of the standard radiation beam therapy and completely misrepresented the experimental therapy as the best and only hope for treating the “brain tumor”.

On top of that the implants that are actually in my head are different from what they’ve always told my parents, me and even other doctors (not associated with that hospital).


Incorrect & incomplete medical records:

The medical records from that time (pre email era) are incorrect, inconsistent and miss all the crucial info.
For example: All the medication and supplements are named and described down to the minutest details, while all crucial detailed info about the implants is missing.


Refusal to provide vital info:

The strangest thing is that they refuse to give this detailed info about the implants to anyone requesting it.

1) One of my parents requested this info 6 years after the surgery (in 1997). Yet, the professor condescendingly refused the request, dismissing it as useless to give that info to my parents.
2) I wrote a registered letter to the professor (in 2007) asking about the precise info of the metal/metal alloy used for the implants*, but got no answer. (*to know how to better treat the allergy etc.)
3) The appointment I made later with the professor to get answers was cancelled, without me even receiving any notice of its cancellation. (apparently the professor was off work that period to write a book about his succes stories).
4) In the years that followed I went to 4 more General practitioners to ask for the info, but got no answers. One doctor told me the medical staff from the hospital did not want to give the info I needed, because they feared I would take them to court. And the last doctor told me in a seriously threatening manner I should stop asking questions and stop looking (for the to me vital) info and live as though the implants are not there (completely dismissing the harm they cause to my health & life).


It’s eve worse:
The narrative does not match MRI images and other available info

This all took place before I found out that what they had been telling me about what was in my head did not even match my own MRI pictures.
They always told me I had only 1 implant in my head and that this was called brachytherapy (as stated in the records). But I actually have 2 implants in my head and they are not brachy therapy seeds at all (see previous post nr. 4).

[All is one]

@ abmqa: Thank you very much for putting effort in to looking for the correct research papers.🙏🏻

Mismatching criteria:

Yet, the issue is that the implants don’t match any criteria of brachytherapy seeds/therapy. They are way too big, don’t create a correct radiation treatment field (for a round tumor of 3 cm) and don’t have any similar implantation pattern to brachy seeds. (For long explanation see previous post nr. 4)

Even testing out different radiation strengths etc. don’t explain the difference in size, amount etc.


Possibilities

It’s possible that these implants belong to one of their other experiments on brain implants.

The “mastermind” behind these implants was Luc Calliauw.
He was also into researching:
● Hemispherectomy (a surgical procedure that removes or disconnects one half (hemisphere) of the brain).
● Remotely controllable implants: like implants that could be controlled from outside (in order to give electrical stimuli to reduce pain, like in “spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain” and “ vagus nerve stimulation for refract oratory epilepsy”)

● Of course it can be something completely different they were testing out also.

Maybe it is even something else that they did not put in their public records. Who knows?


Lack of responsibility- accountability

Anyway, whatever it is, as a patient I think I have the right to get full clearance on the info of whatever they were testing.
No matter what their reason is for refusing to provide me with the correct (and verifiable) info; it’s vital for me that I get/find it.

Maybe there were some other researches at that time that involved brain implants?



Have a great New Year's Eve and thanks for the help!