Charlie Kirk assassinated, 10 Sept 2025

[Rizotto]

At 6:53 - "Stacy Sheridan was working directly under Kinstar when he was hired by Jeffrey Epstein." Tracy Sheridan is now working at TPUSA.

CANDACE OWENS CAUGHT ERIKA KIRK CAUGHT & BEN SHAPIRO PLOT

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EJoYc7GZRxA

[bojancan]

Here’s Why It’s Time For The Police To Question Erika Kirk… | Candace Ep 305

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ti5Fxrvegno

00:00 - Start.
01:04 - Erika's story doesn't add up.
17:32 - Megyn Kelly tells Piers Morgan that Charlie changed his mind on Israel.
25:45 - A Tiktoker asks some solid questions about Erika's background.
35:47 - Final thoughts and comments.

[bojancan]

For those of you, who would not go through videos by Baron Coleman... here is today's resumé by Sabrina... about all, what Baron was discovering/talking in his channel... more and more people are discovering about Erika... so sad, how people can so blatantly lies plays their roles...

BREAKING! Erika Kirk Inappropriate Relationship EXPOSED!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uncqMPDBduI

[bojancan]

More exposure!

VIRAL: Who Removed Charlie's Wedding Photo, And Why? | Candace Ep 306

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hWTdXHGQ8R4

Laura Loomer demands Erika Kirk sues me, Carrie Prejean is removed from the White House Religious Liberty Commission, and Erika's interview with Glenn Beck goes viral after the internet spots a wedding photo missing from the home studio.

[bojancan]

Good Baron... he is digging and digging... deep dive from today...

The Suite Life - Erika Kirk's (Alleged) Role in Her Mom's (Alleged) Intelligence Career - #62

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=TnlxpLSTnYE

We begin our really deep dive into the life and times of Erika Kirk's mother, Lori Frantzve, and ask the obvious question: Is she (allegedly) sheep dipped, too?

0:00 Intro
3:38 Why Romania?
12:19 Where is Constanta, Romania?
13:49 Lori Frantzve Patent Application (2005)
15:46 Lori's Company's Lobby History after Patent (2006)
16:23 Lori's AZ-TECH Incorporation (Sept 2007)
19:58 Erika Frantzve's Everyday Heroes Incorporation (November 2007)
21:22 Everyday Heroes Shares Suite with AZ-TECH
22:33 Lori's Company Gets $2.4 Million Earmark (2008)
29:08 Lori's Company is an 8(a) Economically Disadvantaged Business
37:25 Lori's Company Gets a $1.9 Million Contract in DC
38:18 Lori's Company Claims Awarded Service Medal that Requires Military Service
46:08 Lori's Contact Information in Leak of INSA Intelligence Insiders
52:20 Lori's Neighbors at Her Business in Scottsdale are Sniper Trainers
1:05:00 Potential Longer Lines of Sight to Charlie Kirk at UVU
1:11:35 Erika Kirk's Proclaim Streetwear Incorporated After Meeting Charlie Kirk
1:13:16 Romanian-US Agreement in 2005 for Constanta Cooperation
1:19:26 Review of Supers

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1hcjQGgvxUY

. 12/2/26---´The internet digs up an odd relationship Erika had with a then 15-year-old girl named Jillian, Pam Bondi rants about the stock market while being questioned about Epstein, and TPUSA issues a statement about the missing wedding photo. ´

[Rizotto]

"In this 51-49 mini-documentary, James deconstructs the 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk to determine if it was the work of a lone gunman or a professional "correction" by a global intelligence apparatus, tracing a $3.6 billion financial trail from post-war Japanese war criminals and the "Moon Cult" laundromat to the sudden Zionist rebranding of TPUSA 2.0 and the suspicious installation of a more compliant leadership — including Erika Kirk— to ensure the survival of a shadow church built on clandestine foreign influence."

TPUSA 2.0: Why Charlie Kirk Had to Die (Allegedly)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xXOUyRbXt0Q

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Hpwtzpgl1DY

--35 min--
Feb 15, 2026 #CandaceOwens #ErikaKirk #CharlieKirk
´Elizabeth Lane just dropped one of the most brutal analyses of Erika Kirk yet — and Candace Owens called it a “must read.”

In this episode, we break down the exposé that’s now circulating everywhere… and why so many people are quietly admitting it explains exactly what they’ve been feeling from the beginning.

This isn’t gossip.
It isn’t rumor.
It’s about patterns.

We go deep into:

• Why so many viewers feel physical discomfort watching Erika speak
• The psychology behind “emotional incongruence”
• The rapid persona shift after marrying Charlie Kirk
• The power-couple brand theory
• What changed when Charlie reportedly refused big money and dirty politics
• And why the reaction at the memorial still doesn’t sit right with people

Elizabeth Lane doesn’t accuse a crime.
She offers a psychological interpretation.

And Candace Owens amplified it.

That alone tells you something.

By the end of this breakdown, you’ll understand why this post hit so hard — and why people across the political spectrum are quietly agreeing with it.´

[Rizotto]

by Elizabeth Lane – February 13, 2026
X post - https://x.com/imelizabethlane/status...18820070281295

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is.

I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath.

What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain:

That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her.

Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.)

Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance.

Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity.

Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure.

Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power.

What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker.

Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride.

What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time.

In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks!

It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely!

Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing.

Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came.

What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion.

This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this ****.

[Rizotto]

Just my thoughts about the above piece by Elizabeth Lane (which was recommended by Candace Owen on X):

Elizabeth hits the mark when stating that most of us feel uncomfortable watching Erika Kirk speak, because we recognize a lot of fakeness there. Elizabeth explains Erika's performative appearances as 'psychopathy'. However, Elizabeth's analysis falls short of wholly explaining the situation as she leaves out TPUSA staff's strange behaviour or Erika's background and childhood.

Personally I think there are a lot of pointers indicating that Erika was groomed from a young age to take on this sort of role, i.e. to influence or shape major political stances towards specific goals. And I mean groomed by her parents and/or some type of agency, e.g. MKULTRA. What do we really know about Erika's upbringing? It all looks quite sketchy so far, until the weird Romanian orphanage thing which is connected to high level military.

If some sort of MKUltra upbringing is the case here, then it's no coincidence that Erika was paired to Charlie Kirk and TPUSA, which is/was obviously manipulated to advance the zionist cause. Probably planned long in advance. It would also explain Erika's lack of authenticity, as dissociative personality is the result of this type of programming. And Erika is obviously not the only tool, many others connected to TPUSA or zionism are doing the same.

I wonder at this point how much awareness each of these individuals have about what they are doing. While dissociation may be the end result of cult upbringing, whether it be zionism, satanism, MKUltra, etc, we know that some individuals have been able to break through & away from the programming and come out with their souls intact.

[Rizotto]

February 15, 2026 video by "Wolves and Finance" (I haven't watched it yet, but it is recommended by many viewers...)

"I have been reporting on Charlie Kirk’s death, and something that keeps coming up is a military base in Arizona called Fort Huachuca. I have been taking a closer look and have uncovered what looks like a lot of fraud."

BOMBSHELL: Fraud at Fort Huachuca (allegedly)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AYxRjdweg8s

[TrumanCash]

Is Erika Kirk Tammy Faye Bakker Reincarnated? -- Fact Check



In spite of rumors on social media platforms, Tammy Faye Bakker did not reincarnate into Erika Kirk's body. Tammy Bakker died in 2007 so Erika Kirk would have been 19 years old now. Erika is 37 years old so she is not Tammy Bakker reincarnated.

However, Tammy Bakker could have forcibly taken over Erika Kirk's body in 2007, theoretically speaking. In light of the similar extravagant lifestyles, alleged fake tears, etc, it appears that Tammy moved up in world, financially speaking, given the Kirk's 5+ million dollar mansion. Apparently, Jesus saves and Jesus pays.

[Rizotto]

Interesting physical resemblance between Erika Kirk and Tammy Bakker. Could they be related?

[bojancan]

Baron is always good talker... I am listening to him by times stamps.. what is interesting to me... here is from yesterday...

A Fly in the Alibi - Was Erika Kirk in Utah when Charlie Kirk was Hit? - #64

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BXDql_VYXzM

We review who was where and when? We review flights other people are missing.

We also review the viral video claiming a $1.3 billion motive for the life of Charlie Kirk. Hint: We disagree.

0:00 Intro
4:06 Opening Statement - Alex Murdaugh Case Cracked by Timeline
14:33 Ian Carroll Pulls a Baron
15:46 Do Flight Records Support New Provo Timeline for Erika Kirk and Andrew Kolvet?
47:30 Satellite Image from September 10 of Egyptian Jet on Provo Tarmac
51:33 Summary of Timeline of Flights to and from Provo on Date of Charlie Kirk Event
52:15 Why Erika Kirk Couldn't Answer whether Andrew Kolvet's Wife Flew with Him
1:03:43 Debunking Viral Video about TPUSA and $1.3 Billion Motive
1:22:43 Supporting Documentation for Jets being Charter Jets and Charlie's Timeline
1:33:02 Review of Supers

[bojancan]

Placing also here this video... interesting!

Feb, 15
THE REAL MOTIVE?!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sw8VpcYiXV0

Please note: All statements in this video are personal commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. They do not represent definitive facts or accusations. I do not intend to harm, defame, or mislead anyone, and encourage viewers to do their own research and form their own conclusions. Everything you see on this channel reflects my personal views and opinions. It’s just me sharing my thoughts, ideas, and commentary—nothing here is connected to or represents any company or organization I may work with/for.

[bojancan]

And... we all want to expose those who lies and cheat... who are grifters and opportunists... not honest ones!More and more unbelievable stuff is coming out...
Always good stuff, Sabrina!


Feb, 16
Sabby Sabs
351K subscribers
Erika Kirk Political Past COMES BACK!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iOGlj2E3itg

[Rizotto]

"I dug up something very strange about Erika Kirk's behavior on social media right before Charlie Kirk was killed. Instagram influencer is doing a better job with the Epstein Files than the FBI and DOJ..."

Very Weird Erika Kirk Behavior It’s Time We Talk About…

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=l1H4vRrJ3OA

[bojancan]

Feb, 16

Why Does Audio after Charlie Kirk Event Not Support Fed Slop Narrative? - #65

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5woiwMduTfE

Listen with us as we explore why the contemporaneous audio following the Charlie Kirk event at Utah Valley University is inconsistent with the mainstream narrative.

0:00 Intro
3:44 Opening Statement - OJ Simpson
21:08 Importance of My Opening Statements Relative to Charlie Kirk Investigation
23:30 A Second Look at Police/Fire Transmissions from Sept 10 in Light of New Evidence
48:18 Multiple Descriptions of Alleged Perpetrator with Long Hair, Shoulder-Length Hair
51:09 Brand New Images of Lance Twiggs with Long Hair, Shoulder-Length Hair
56:58 Hidden Camera Footage of Long Hair Suspect First Given to Police within Three Minutes of Bang
1:05:24 Police Confusion whether Erika Kirk at Duncan Aviation or Signature at Provo Airport
1:21:44 Police BOLO for Suspect Going Hospital to Hospital Searching for Charlie Kirk
1:24:55 FBI Arrives on the Scene; DO NOT INTERVIEW ANDREW; Finds Gun Immediately
1:33:36 How My Recent Opening Statements Set Up My Opinion on What Happened to Charlie Kirk
1:47:14 Review of Supers

[bojancan]

This talk by David and Max... should be here too... after 20 min.... talk also about CK... good as always... both of them...
Feb, 16
Dave Smith Interview Max Blumenthal | UK Policy Shifts, Middle East Tensions & Media Controversies

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wiAJ5jt4EoE

Dave Smith Interview Max Blumenthal | UK Policy Shifts, Middle East Tensions & Media Controversies

Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by Tucker Carlson! They talk about the heavy backlash from Tucker's interview with Nick Fuentes, the divide between people who support and oppose Israel in America, Ben Shapiro's past articles, and more.

[Rizotto]

"In this deep-dive investigation, we break down newly surfaced police scanner audio, suspect descriptions, and background comparisons that are reigniting debate around the Charlie Kirk case and putting the spotlight back on Lance Twiggs.
This video examines:
-The official narrative vs. early reports
-The key physical description that raised new questions
-The relationship between Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs
-The text message timeline
-Behavioral and profile comparisons
-Online claims, what is confirmed, and what remains unverified"

New Audio Changes EVERYTHING in the Charlie Kirk Case… Was the Wrong Man Charged?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y82kvFXFp20