(all new) The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares: from Bitchute & waccobb.net

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX.

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here: https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation).

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
(Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3JfZDyj0KU (at 10:50-59:50);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXSqgD1KjdY (at 13:50-19:15, 31:40-33:00, 43:00-43:20, 124:00-124:50);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfG9zljgFh0 (at 3:25-4:20; 9:55-10:35);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3JfZDyj0KU (at 10:50-16:00);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D78hBBAH7hk (at 14:00-14:40);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2rFlcJZfck(at 13:50-15:45);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U (at 1:02:10-1:03:50).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llh0ULNz918 (at 17:05-18:15)

THE DOCUMENT:

http://stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE).

THE HOAX:
In THE SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims to have discovered another "secret" or "leaked" official document which she claims constitutes "PROOF" that "The Bilderbergs" are killing us all (or "plan" to kill us all) with "SILENT WEAPONS" in "QUIET WARS" in furtherance of the "planned extinction of mankind". (Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that these "SILENT WEAPONS" are diabolical economics, cell phones, cell towers, WIFI, smart meters, 5G, geo-engineering, PG&E DEW's in space, HAARP, etc.). But, NONE of her claims about this document are so.

Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars ("SWFQW") is actual a literary "false flag" which the civilian author made to look like a "leaked" government document to make it look like the U.S. government was secretly waging "quiet wars" against its own civilian population using "silent weapons".. Lyle Hartford Van Dyke wrote this short, 44 page booklet in 1979. (Van Dyke is a convicted felon who spent a decade in federal prison for manufacturing and uttering FAKE currency drawn on the U.S. Treasury".). SWFQW is not a secret, leaked or suppressed government document. Van Dyke was not a whistle blower. He was a political commentator.

Van Dyke believed (perhaps correctly) that the U.S. had advance knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and allowed it to happen (killing thousands of American soldiers) in order to draw the U.S. into World War II. (Van Dyke's father's uncle was directly involved in all these alleged events and Van Dyke was raised to believe that all of this was so.).

Van Dyke was outraged by this perceived treasonous ACT OF WAR BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT UPON ITS OWN SOLDIERS and wanted to make the HORRORS of this perceived treasonous act of war "PERSONAL" to the American public. So, Van Dyke wrote SWFQW and suggested that instead of intentionally killing ITS OWN SOLDIERS in such a treasonous act of war, the U.S. government was instead killing IT OWN CIVILIAN POPULATION in such a treasonous act of war (a clever twist of the perceived facts). (Note that this claim would indeed make the HORRORS of such a "Pearl Harbor-type" war on Americans "PERSONAL" to the reader.)

But, Van Dyke realized that the public would not actually believe his premise (of a U.S. war against the American public) without the presence of the usual weapons of war, like those that were present at Pearl Harbor (armed soldiers, trucks, tanks, planes, ships, missiles, bombs, etc.). So, in writing SWFQW, Van Dyke suggested that all of the weapons that the U.S. government was using in this FICTIONAL war against the American public were high tech weapons that COULD NOT BE SEEN OR HEARD (which Deborah Tavares has recently embellished to mean diabolical economics, cell phones, cell towers, WIFI, microwaves, "smart meters", 5G, geo-engineering, PG&E DEWS's in space and HAARP, etc.).

Indeed, it was precisely because such weapons could not be seen or heard that Van Dyke's claims actually appeared to be true. All of this actually made Van Dyke's claims of INVISIBLE & INAUDIBLE weapons MORE (not less) BELIEVABLE to the reader. By using this ruse, VAN DYKE ACTUALLY MADE THE ABSENCE OF WEAPONS EVEN MORE HORRIFYING TO THE READER THAN THEIR PRESENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN. It was absolutely brilliant.

Van Dyke openly admits that SWFQW was inspired by an earlier book of POLITICAL FICTION which he greatly admired entitled, "The Report From Iron Mountain" (see below). Van Dyke also openly admits to having incorporated sections of REAL (and frightening) scientific and economic TECHNICAL studies (written by REAL experts in those fields) into his work is make his work look more realistic. (In Van Dyke's letters to ParaniaMagazine.com, attached below, he TWICE correctly identified the REAL author of The Report From Iron Mountain, Leonard C. Lewin.). Finally, Van Dyke openly admits that he created SWFQW to read like an official governmental document (as did "The Report From Iron Mountain" on which his work was modeled) in order to make his work look more realistic.

FACT:
According to Van Dyke himself, the ORIGINAL version of his document HAD NO PREFACE AT ALL. So, it would be IMPOSSIBLE for that non-existent preface to refer to "The Bilderberg Group". But, the version of this document on Deborah Tavares' own website contains a recently-created FAKE preface which falsely indicates that SWFQW was a plan adopted by the"The Bilderberg Group" in 1954 at its first known meeting. But, that is not so.

PROOF:
FOR THE BEST PROOF OF THE FACTS ABOVE, SCROLL DOWN TO THE ATTACHMENTS AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THIS POST AND CLICK ON EACH ONE IN ORDER. LOOK FOR EMPHASIS.

VAN DYKE'S OWN WORDS ABOUT SWFQW:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_...uiet_Wars.html
(THIS IS A MUST READ.)

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/s...l_cooper6a.htm
(THIS IS A MUST READ.)

PROOF THAT VAN DYKE'S COMPLAINT WAS THE ALLEGED U.S. BETRAYAL AT PEARL HARBOR:
When discussing his work, Van Dyke himself said, "Also #74-1120 [a CODE Van Dyke placed into SWFQW] IS AN ANAGRAM OF THE DATE OF THE JAPANESE ATTACK ON PEARL HARBOR, 41-12-07... . My book on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was published at the end of August 1973." (Excerpt from the link above).

PROOF THAT VAN DYKE'S COMPLAINT WAS THE ALLEGED U.S. BETRAYAL AT PEARL HARBOR:
http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2016...h-pearl-harbor
(THIS IS A MUST READ.)

PROOF THAT VAN DYKE'S COMPLAINT WAS THE ALLEGED U.S. BETRAYAL AT PEARL HARBOR:
https://rense.com/general69/advance.htm
(THIS IS A MUST READ.)

PROOF THAT VAN DYKE WAS THE AUTHOR, THAT IT DID NOT MENTION "THE BILDERBERGS" AND THAT HE INCORPORATED REAL SCIENTIFIC AND ECONOMIC STUDIES OF OTHERS INTO HIS WORK:
https://henrithibodeau.wordpress.com...al-domination/
(THIS IS A MUST READ.)

http://trueconspiracyblog.blogspot.c...uth-about.html

https://steemit.com/new/@anarcho-pir...for-quiet-wars

http://loons38.rssing.com/chan-9751110/all_p61.html (at the 3rd section at about 7% through the text)


CONCLUSION:
Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', SWFQW DOES NOT "PROVE" THAT "THE BILDERBERGS" ADOPTED A PLAN IN 1954 TO KILL US ALL WITH "SILENT WEAPONS" IN "QUIET WARS" in furtherance of the panned extinction of mankind. To the contrary, SWFQW actually reflects an effort on the part of a single American civilian, THROUGH THE CLEVER USE OF FICTION, to call attention to U.S. war policies that he perceived as harmful to Americans. Deborah Tavares knew the truth about this document all along, but she decided to lie to the American people about it anyway in order to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides NO SUPPORT FOR THAT PROPOSITION.

YouTube video on this very hoax by VIrgo Triad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqJJynF_3zU

YouTube
CLICK ON THE ATTACHMENTS BELOW. THEN, CLICK ON THE POP-UP THAT WILL APPEAR AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF YOUR COMPUTER SCREEN.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 1-Part I; Proof Van Dyke Wrote Silent Weapons.pdf (6.52 MB, 1581 views)
File Type: pdf 2-Part IIa, Proof Van Dyke Wrote Silent Weapons.pdf (5.33 MB, 1755 views)
File Type: pdf 3-Part IIb, Proof Van Dyke Wrote Silent Weapons.pdf (5.34 MB, 1772 views)
File Type: pdf 4-Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars.pdf (4.55 MB, 1569 views)
File Type: pdf 5-Fake Currency.pdf (1.59 MB, 1384 views)
File Type: pdf 6-Phony Liens.pdf (3.79 MB, 1272 views)
File Type: pdf 7-Psychiatric Illness - Part 1.pdf (5.52 MB, 1353 views)
File Type: pdf 8-Psychiatric Illness - Part 2.pdf (5.86 MB, 1223 views)
File Type: pdf 10-Lyle Hartford Van Dyke Bonus Features.pdf (3.41 MB, 1420 views)
File Type: pdf 11-Bonus Features-.pdf (3.04 MB, 1327 views)[/BITCHUTE][/ODY]

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX.

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here: https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation).

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
(Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GKZSTbtBgo (at 13:00-16:10, 18:30-28:40);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXSqgD1KjdY (at 37:50-39:30, 40:45-41:25, 42:40-43:00);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (at 59:15-106:05);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (at 25:05-26:10);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3JfZDyj0KU (at 100:30-105:40).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D78hBBAH7hk (at 100:30-105:40)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_n3v3CxQH8 (at 34:40-37:40)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPISSEErIs4 (at 25:05-26:10)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llh0ULNz918 (at 18:15-21:30)

THE DOCUMENT:

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/Rep..._Iron_Mountain (NOTE WEBSITE).

THE HOAX: In THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX, Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims to have discovered another "secret" and/or "leaked" and/or "suppressed" government document which she claims "proves" that ALL ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES ("global warming", "climate change", increased drought, fires, etc.) ARE "ENGINEERED" by the U.S. government to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, none of these claims about this document are so.

The Report From Iron Mountain ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE ("TRFIM") is actually a literary "false flag" which the civilian author made to look like a "leaked" government document written by U.S. government officials to make the U.S. government look completely insane for waging endless, perpetual wars (against FAKE enemies, if necessary) solely to prop up the U.S. economy. But, this is not so. Leonard C. Lewin wrote TRFIM in 1967. It was SO POPULAR and SO WIDELY READ that it actually made the "New York Times Best Seller List". (So much for Deborah Tavares' "secret", "leaked" or "suppressed" document story.). It is not a "secret", "leaked" or "suppressed" government document. Lewin was not a whistle blower. He was a political commentator.

It was 1967. It was the middle of the Vietnam War. Lewin was critical of U.S. policy because the U.S. had been in an almost perpetual state of war for decades and he believed (perhaps correctly) that the U.S. economy was too dependent upon military spending. In criticizing this U.S policy, Lewin SARCASTICALLY observed that U.S. policy makers MUST HAVE BELIEVED THAT THE U.S. COULD NOT AFFORD PEACE (meaning that if the U.S. was not actually engaged in perpetual wars, the U.S. government and the U.S. economy might actually collapse).

Lewin sought to make a MOCKERY of this U.S. war policy and the ABSURDITY of the beliefs that apparently underlied it. Lewin wanted to publicly EMBARRASS and HUMILIATE U.S. policy makers who supported a policy of perpetual war. So, he wrote "The Report From Iron Mountain ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE" (the book's FULL title). (Note that it is the FINAL SEVEN WORDS of this title which reveal Lewin's TRUE thesis statement.)

So, in writing TRFIM, Lewin pretended to be an imaginary committee of the U.S. government which pretended to "report" to these very same U.S. policy makers (whom he sought to EMBARRASS and HUMILIATE) that PEACE WAS POSSIBLE, BUT NOT DESIRABLE (hence, the FULL title to Lewin's book). In writing TRFIM (and in pretending to be an imaginary committee of the U.S. government), Lewin pretended to "report" to U.S. policy makers that the U.S. economy was so dependent on perpetual war that "IF PEACE BROKE OUT", THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WOULD ACTUALLY BE FORCED TO CREATE "FAKE ENEMIES" (called "alternative enemies") TO JUSTIFY "FAKE WARS" (called "credible substitutes" for wars) AGAINST THOSE "FAKE ENEMIES" in order to prop up the U.S. government and the U.S. economy. (Note here how Lewin OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging perpetual wars by making it EVEN MORE ABSURD than it already was.).

Specifically, in writing TRFIM (and in pretending to be an imaginary committee of the U.S. government), Lewin pretended to "report" to U.S. policy makers that "IF PEACE BROKE OUT", THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WOULD BE FORCED TO CREATE "FAKE ALIEN LIFE FORMS" (which will not actually exist) and ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES like pollution to justify "FAKE WARS" against those "FAKE ENEMIES" in order to to prop up the U.S. economy. (Note here how Lewin OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging perpetual wars by making it EVEN MORE ABSURD than it already was.). It was absolutely brilliant.

Deborah Tavares claims that the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES in the book refer to "global warming", "climate change", increased drought, fires, etc. But, this is not so. The book's environmental focus is on environmental POLLUTION , not global warming, climate change, drought or fires. Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that the U.S. Government actually uses these "engineered" ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES as "weapons" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind (SOMETHING NOT IN THE BOOK). But, this claim is not so.

The premise of Lewin's book was that the U.S. economy is so dependent on military spending that "IF PEACE BROKE OUT", the U.S. would be forced to CREATE "FAKE ENEMIES" to "justify" "FAKE WARS" against those "FAKE ENEMIES" to prop up the U.S. economy. Lewin did not intend the readers of his book to believe that the U.S. government was ACTUALLY creating ALIEN LIFE FORMS (which will not exist) or ACTUALLY creating ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES like pollution. Instead, Lewin merely used those two absurd examples of "FAKE enemies" TO MAKE A MOCKERY of how far the U.S. government would go TO CREATE FAKE ENEMIES TO JUSTIFY FAKE WARS to prop up the U.S. economy.

Lewin created TRFIM to read like an official U.S. government committee "REPORT" to U.S. policy makers IN ORDER TO PUBLICLY EMBARRASS AND HUMILIATE U.S. POLICY MAKERS WHO SUPPORTED PERPETUAL WAR (by making their policy of perpetual war APPEAR EVEN MORE "ABSURD" THAN IT ALREADY WAS). It worked. Lewin (like Van Dyke above) incorporated REAL scientific studies into his work to make it look more realistic. A division of Simon & Schuster published Lewin's book.

As if to prove that Lewin was the REAL author of TRFIM, when an unauthorized publisher later re-published his book without his permission (and without paying him royalties), HE SUED THE RE-PUBLISHER AND WON A LARGE SETTLEMENT, something that would have been impossible if the book had actually been written by a REAL "committee of the U. S. government" as Tavares falsely claims.

PROOF:

http://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/..._iron_mountain

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Report_from_Iron_Mountain

http://scua.library.umass.edu/umarmot/lewin-leonard-c/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Re..._Iron_Mountain

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_C._Lewin

http://articles.latimes.com/1999/feb/01/news/mn-3716

https://www.biblio.com/leonard-c-lewin/author/560147

CONCLUSION:
Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', TRFIM DOES NOT "PROVE" THAT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS ACTUALLY CREATING "ENGINEERED" ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES (such as "global warming", "climate change", "engineered drought", fires, etc.) TO USE AS "WEAPONS" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind (something not in the book). To the contrary, SWFQW actually reflects an effort on the part of a single American civilian, THROUGH THE CLEVER USE OF FICTION, to call attention to U.S. war policies that he perceived as harmful to Americans. Deborah Tavares knew the truth about the document all along, but she decided to lie to the American people about it anyway in order to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/2...congess-denial

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides NO SUPPORT FOR THAT PROPOSITION.

Youtube video on this very hoax by Virgo Triad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjqQReWw_Dk
YouTube
For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...-Troy-Williams)

For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970

For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...161#post229161

For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax

For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...352#post230352;
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...bra-Jones-Hoax.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.
Last edited by snoop4truth; 05-30-2020 at 04:31 PM.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE AGENDA 21 HOAX.

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here: https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation).

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
(Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WQfXQWHRAw (at 4:40-4:50, 9:25-9:55)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeNsM0a75iE (at 23:25-23:50)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cq1NipzK-Y (at 31:05-32:50)

THE DOCUMENTS: The Agenda 21 Hoax is based on TWO DOCUMENTS. The Agenda 21 document itself was a REAL United Nations document. So, the hoax is not the document itself. Agenda 21 was merely a SUGGESTION WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED. And, under the United States Constitution, Senate approval is required for the United States to enter into a treaty or to make federal law. (See the 2nd paragraph here. https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/article-ii-section-2). So, Agenda 21 NEVER BECAME A TREATY, NEVER BECAME THE LAW AND IS NOT ENFORCED ANYWHERE IN THE UNTIED STATES. That means Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

The other document involved in this hoax is a "SIMULATED" land use map which Deborah Tavares fraudulently calls the "Agenda 21 Map". This "SIMULATED" land use map is FAKE and HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 in the first place. Instead, it related to the proposed "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21) WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE ALSO REJECTED. So, that proposed treaty (and its FAKE map) are also COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

Deborah Tavares knew the truth (above) all along, but nevertheless decided to lie about it anyway in order to incite fear, hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

THE HOAX:
In the "Agenda 21 Hoax", Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that the Agenda 21 document "CONSTITUTES PROOF" that the United Nations is using diabolical methods (like fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. See proof below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cq1NipzK-Y (at 30:45-32:55).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U (at 5:00-6:05);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAwycy_u110 (at 14:50-16:50);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cq1NipzK-Y (at 30:45-32:55).

But, her claims are not so.

The Agenda 21 document was written by the world's leading environmental scientists (not by "PG&E", the "Rothschilds" or the "Rockefellers"). Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

The idea behind Agenda 21 was that the survival of mankind on Earth is dependent on the survival of the environment on Earth. By saving the environment, we can save mankind. So, Agenda 21 was intended to prevent the extinction of mankind, exactly opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax to the effect that Agenda 21 is a plan to cause the extinction of mankind.

The "Agenda 21" document suggested that we reduce the rate at which we deplete our natural resources to the same rate at which at which they can recover from being depleted (called "sustainable development"). If the United States Senate had ratified or approved Agenda 21, it would have PROTECTED MOST OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, exactly the opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax (to the effect that the United Nations intentionally burned the forests of California in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PRESERVE THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE.) If the United States Senate had ratified or approved Agenda 21, it would have also REDUCED DROUGHT AND INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE, exactly the opposite of what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax to the effect that droughts and the shortage of fresh water not contaminated by sewage were "engineered" in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS IN THE FIRST PLACE.)

AGENDA 21 IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT IN THE UNITED STATES!
Agenda 21 was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. While president Bush symbolically "signed" the Agenda 21 document, THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED AGENDA 21, and under the United States Constitution, Senate approval is required for the United States to enter into a TREATY or to make federal law. (See the 2nd paragraph here. https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/article-ii-section-2 ). So, Agenda 21 IS NOT A TREATY , IS NOT THE LAW and CANNOT BE (AND IS NOT) ENFORCED anywhere in the United States. So, Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. The 5th paragraph here sums it up perfectly. https://www.splcenter.org/20140331/a...spiracy-theory . But, Deborah Tavares FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALS that CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FACT from her followers.

WHAT AGENDA 21 IS ACTUALLY ABOUT:

BELOW IS A SECTION OF THE ACTUAL "TABLE OF CONTENTS" OF "AGENDA 21" ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF "AGENDA 21".

SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
11. COMBATING DEFORESTATION 11.1 - 11.40
12. MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING desertification and DROUGHT 12.1 - 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
15. CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY15.1 - 15.11
16. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 16.1 - 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
18.PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: application of integrated approaches to the development, MANAGEMENT and use OF WATER RESOURCES 18.1 - 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 - 20.46
21. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF solid wastes and SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES 21.1 - 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes

AND, ALL OF THIS IS ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF AGENDA 21 HERE.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf

BELOW IS THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf
(THIS IS A MUST READ.). BEGIN AT SECTION 11.1 AT ABOUT 25% THROUGH THE TEXT. THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21 READS AS FOLLOWS:

AGENDA 21 – CHAPTER 11

COMBATING DEFORESTATION

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Sustaining the multiple roles and functions of all types of FORESTS, FOREST LANDS and WOODLANDS.
Basis for action

11.1. There are major weaknesses in the policies, methods and mechanisms adopted to support and develop the multiple ecological, economic, social and cultural roles of TREES, FORESTS, and FOREST LANDS. Many developed countries are confronted with the effects of air pollution and FIRE DAMAGE ON THEIR FORESTS. More effective measures and approaches are often required at the national level to improve and harmonize policy formulation, planning and programming; legislative measures and instruments; development patterns; participation of the general public, especially women and indigenous people; involvement of youth; roles of the private sector, local organizations, non-governmental organizations and cooperatives; development of technical and multidisciplinary skills and quality of human resources; FORESTRY extension and public education; research capability and support; administrative structures and mechanisms, including intersectoral coordination, decentralization and responsibility and incentive systems; and dissemination of information and public relations. This is especially important to ensure a rational and holistic approach to the sustainable and environmentally sound development of FORESTS. The need for securing the multiple roles of FORESTS and FOREST LANDS through adequate and appropriate institutional strengthening has been repeatedly emphasized in many of the reports, decisions and recommendations of FAO, ITTO, UNEP, the World Bank, IUCN and other organizations.

Objectives
11.2. The objectives of this programme area are as follows:
a. To STRENGTHEN FOREST-RELATED NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, to enhance the scope and effectiveness
of activities related to the management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of FORESTS, and to effectively ensure the sustainable utilization and production of FORESTS' goods and services in both the developed and the developing countries; by the year 2000, to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of national institutions to enable them to acquire the necessary knowledge for the PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS, as well as to expand their scope and, correspondingly, enhance the effectiveness of programmes and activities related to the management and development of FORESTS;
b. To strengthen and improve human, technical and professional skills, as well as expertise and capabilities to effectively formulate and implement policies, plans, programmes, research and projects on management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of all
types of FORESTS and FOREST-based resources, and FOREST LANDS inclusive, as well as other areas from which FORESTS BENEFITS CAN BE DERIVED.

AND, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 11 OF AGENDA 21!

IMPORTANT:
You will note from the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21 itself (above), THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR INCREMENTALLY REDUCING THE AREAS ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE (to systematically drive them from their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly smaller, densely packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind).


THE "AGENDA 21 MAP"
In addition to the Agenda 21 document itself (described above), Deborah Tavares also claims to have discovered a "SIMULATED" land use map which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTES PROOF that Agenda 21 is a plan which uses diabolical means (like forest fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

The "SIMULATED" Land Use Map
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/exp...opaganda.6855/

To see another version of this "SIMULATED" land use map, scroll down to about 40% through the text here.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/parad...ather-warfare/

OTHER VERSIONS OF THIS MAP:
https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Fm6zNgdf57I

IMPORTANT:
Note that this "SIMULATED" land use map makes NO REFERENCE to "Agenda 21" whatsoever and that IT REFERS INSTEAD to the "Convention On Biological Diversity" (something different from Agenda 21). Importantly, this "SIMULATED" land use map ALSO REFERS TO "The Wildlands Project" (a mere suggestion from private environmentalists which IS NOT LAW and which HAS NOTHING to do with the United Nations), "UN and US Man And Biosphere Program", various "Heritage Programs" and "NAFTA" (which ALSO has NOTHING to do with the United Nations).

PROOF THAT "AGENDA 21" AND THE "BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY TREATY" ARE DIFFERENT FROM ONE ANOTHER.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21 (proposed and rejected in 1992);
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conven...ical_Diversity (proposed and rejected in 1994);

WHO CREATED THIS MAP?
Dr. Michael S. Coffman was a prolific writer, speaker and "property rights advocate". He often spoke at "liberty" conferences sponsored by the John Birch Society. He was an "environmental consultant" acting on behalf of large American land owning interests, land developers (like Deborah Tavares) and large corporations involved in drilling, mining, logging which profit by destroying the environment. Coffman and his American clients opposed land use regulations in general and environmental regulations in particular. In 1994, when Congress was scheduled to vote on ratifying the proposed "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21), Coffman created the subject "SIMULATED" land use map to create opposition in the United States Senate to that particular proposed treaty (not to Agenda 21). https://www.metabunk.org/explained-a...paganda.t6855/. This is why Coffman's "SIMULATED" map only reflected the alleged proposed land use in the United States (while omitting the alleged proposed land use for the entire rest of the world). Coffman was only trying to create opposition for the proposed "Biological Diversity Treaty" in the United States Senate (so that his United States' clients could continue destroying the environment with impunity). It worked. The United States Senate ALSO REJECTED that proposed treaty. Below is a verbatim transcript of the actual Senate debate on that proposed treaty which the Senate ALSO REJECTED. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...-pt1-PgS22.htm.

Coffman conceded that his "SIMULATED" land use map reflected what would be the resulting land use in the United States ONLY IF "ALL" OF THE PROPOSED LAND USE REGULATIONS listed at the top of his map became the law ("The Wildlands Project", "UN And US Man And Biosphere Program", various "Heritage Programs", etc.). But, Agenda 21 itself WAS NOT among those proposed land use regulations reflected by Coffman's map. This is because by the time Coffman created his "SIMULATED" land use map, THE UNITED STATES SENATE HAD ALREADY REJECTED AGENDA 21. So, Coffman claimed to have relied on OTHER proposed land use regulations in creating his "SIMULATED" land use map.

Coffman's "SIMULATED" land use map was WILDLY EXAGERATED (for propaganda purposes) both visually and verbally (note the very first word on the map, "SIMULATED"). Coffman himself coined the phrase, "LITTLE OR NO HUMAN USE" (for propaganda purposes), a phrase which does not appear in any of his alleged source material. Note also that for propaganda purposes, Coffman gave virtually EVERY tiny wildlife refuge on his map MULTIPLE, very wide, migration routes (up to 50 miles wide) to and from neighboring wildlife refuges (as if such were actually required under these OTHER remaining land use proposals). This created the illusion that there would much less land available for human use if these OTHER land use proposals ever became law.

COFFMAN INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED AND EXAGGERATED HIS LAND USE MAP (WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21) TO CREATE THE APPEARANCE THAT IF ALL OF THESE OTHER PROPOSED LAND USE REGULATIONS WERE TO BECOME LAW, THEN, THERE WOULD BE MUCH LESS LAND AVAILABLE FOR HUMAN USE. Regardless, The United States ALSO REJECTED the "Convention On Biodiversity".

FACT:
IT WAS COFFMAN'S EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") LAND USE MAP (WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21) THAT BECAME THE FOUNDATION FOR THE ORIGINAL CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT AGENDA 21 WILL FORCE US OUT OF OUR RURAL AND SUBURBAN HOMES AND INTO OVERPOPULATED CITIES, EVEN THOUGH THAT EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") LAND USE MAP ACTUALLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 IN THE FIRST PLACE!

FACT:
But, it was Deborah Tavares alone who came up with the new, improved and more sensational version of this hoax to the effect that Agenda 21 is a "plan" to use diabolical means (like forest fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the extinction of mankind. Note that this new, improved and more sensation version of this hoax allowed Deborah Tavares to incorporate some of her other hoaxes (to the effect that PG&E used directed energy weapons on satellites in space to start the recent fires in California and that PG&E will use radiation from "smart meters" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind, etc.).

FACT:
Deborah Tavares has always known that Coffman's "SIMULATED" land use map was both WILDLY EXAGGERATED and that IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 IN THE FIRST PLACE, much less with the United Nations using forest fires and laser beams from satellites in space to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, Deborah Tavares nevertheless decided to lie about it anyway in order to incite fear, hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

CONCLUSION:
The United States Senate REJECTED Agenda 21. So, Agenda 21 IS NOT A TREATY, IS NOT THE LAW, IS NOT ENFORCED AND IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. Coffman's WILDLY EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") land use map had NOTHING to do with Agenda 21 in the first place. Coffman's WILDLY EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") land use map was based on ALL of the proposed land use regulations at the time EXCEPT FOR AGENDA 21 ("The Wildlands Project", "UN And US Man And Biosphere Program", various "Heritage Programs", etc.). Coffman created his WILDLY EXAGGERATED "SIMULATED") land use map as propaganda to generate opposition to the "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21) WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE ALSO REJECTED. The fact that some local governments pass environmentally sensitive regulation today HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 (which was rejected almost 30 years ago).

APPLICATION TO HOAX:
THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES DID NOT ADVANCE THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (TO PREVENT FURTHER DEFORESTATION). INDEED, THE RECENT FIRES IN CALIFORNIA ACTUALLY UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (BY DESTROYING THE VERY FORESTS THAT AGENDA 21 WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT)!

THEREFORE, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES WERE NOT "AGENDA 21 FIRES", EVEN IF THEY WERE THE RESULT OF SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY, unrelated to Agenda 21.

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides no support for that proposition.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS:
If I were a charlatan, and if I wanted to create a BETTER version of the Agenda 21 Hoax, this is how I would do it.

1. I would create videos and I would show the REAL, ACTUAL "AGENDA 21" DOCUMENT (unmodified) showing the Agenda 21 "agenda" AS IT IS ACTUALLY WRITTEN in the official document (showing that its purpose is to PROTECT THE REMAINING FORESTS, PREVENT DROUGHT AND ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE (all of which is verifiably true).

2. Then, in my videos, I would show written proof that THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED AGENDA 21 AND THAT IT IS NOT A TREATY, IS NOT THE LAW, AND IS NOT ENFORCED ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES (all of which is also verifiably true).

3. Then, in my videos, I would show ALL OF THE ENVIROMENTAL CATASTROPHES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS SINCE 1992, when Agenda 21 was first proposed AND REJECTED BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE (DESTRUCTION OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, INCREASED DROUGHT, ABSENCE OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE, PEOPLE RENDERED HOMELESS AND DISPLACED BY FOREST FIRES, ETC.).

4. Then, in my videos, I would claim that "THE REFUSAL" (ITSELF) of U.S. Government to adopt "Agenda 21" in I992 constitutes conclusive "PROOF" that the U.S. Government ACTUALLY SOUGHT TO PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL THE REMAINING FORESTS IN CALIFORNIA, PURPOSELY INCREASE DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA AND PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL SUPPLIES OF FRESH WATER IN CALIFORNIA NOT CONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE in order o purposely drive Californians out of their rural and suburban homes and into cities far away from the forests and wilderness areas.

That would make a much BETTER "Agenda 21 Hoax", BECAUSE (except for the nefarious intentions of the U.S. Government part) IT IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERIFIABLY AND FACTUALLY TRUE IN EVERY SINGLE RESPECT! That would make for a MUCH MORE LOGICAL EXPLANATION for the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHIES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS since 1992 than the story that Deborah Tavares peddles now (WHICH ACTUALLY CONTRADICTS THE REAL PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 TO PROTECT THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE).

MORE APPLICATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS:
FACT: When corporate interests are threatened by proposed laws which would reduce their profits, they launch a public relations campaign against those proposed laws. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose the proposed laws for reasons of their own selfish interests. Instead, they pretend that they oppose the proposed laws to protect the interests of society in general (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

EXAMPLE: CONSIDER THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE AS IT RELATES TO AGENDA 21. (NOTE: THIS MAY NOT HAVE EVER OCCURRED. IT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THIS PRINCIPLE.).

If made into law, Agenda 21 (a proposed law) would slow the rate at which logging & mining corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests (and thereby slow the rate at which they generate profits).

So, these corporate interests launch a public relations campaign against Agenda 21. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose Agenda 21 to protect their own profits. Instead, they pretend to oppose Agenda 21 to protect the rest of society (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

So, they come up with a CAREFULLY-CRAFTED LIE intended to get the rest of society to oppose Agenda 21 as much as they do. Instead of admitting that Agenda 21 would only slow down the rate at which logging & mining corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests to generate profits, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION!

Specifically, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY EXPAND THE FORESTS AND WILDERNESS INTO AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ALREADY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS, thereby systematically driving homeowners out of their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, tightly packed, over-populated cities (something that the REAL Agenda 21 would not actually do).

This FRAUDULENT characterization of Agenda 21 would serve to make ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY join with those who profit by destroying the forests. The rest of society would OPPOSE "AGENDA 21" in the mistaken belief THAT THEY WERE SAVING THEIR OWN HOMES IN THE PROCESS. Now, THAT is a brilliant lie. But, it gets even better.

By telling such a lie, logging & mining corporations and real estate developers, like Deborah Tavares, could continue DESTROYING THE FORESTS and continue to cash in without any opposition from the rest of society WHILE SIMULATANEOUSLY BLAMING "AGENDA 21" (WHICH NEVER BECAME LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE) FOR THE HARDSHIPS THAT THEY THEMSELVES KNOWINGLY INFLICT ON THE REST OF SOCIETY BY DESTROYING THE REMAINING FORESTS IN THE PURSUIT OF PROFITS (increased droughts and therefore increased forest fires, decreased fresh water supplies uncontaminated by sewage, etc.). Now, THAT is a TRULY brilliant lie, blaming a SUGGESTION that never became law, for the hardships suffered by Californians, when the SUGGESTION that never became law WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED AND INTENDED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS FROM OCCURRING IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Remember, the foregoing is only an ILLUSTRATION of how corporate interests engage in disinformation campaigns in order to get society to oppose proposed laws that would reduce their profits. I do not know if Deborah Tavares lied to us about Agenda 21 for similar reasons. Ultimately, the reasons she lied to us about Agenda 21 is irrelevant. All that matters is that she lied to us.

Thus, Deborah Tavares has AGAIN lied to us about what the what her documents say in the in the same way that she lied to us about every other document she has ever used in support of her claims about the planned extinction of mankind.

ARTICLE ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/2...congess-denial

VIDEO:
FOR VIRGO TRIAD'S VIDEO ON THIS VERY HOAX, CLICK HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWjy...&index=12

OTHER CHARLATANS:

For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...-Troy-Williams)

For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970

For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...161#post229161

For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax

For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...352#post230352;
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...bra-Jones-Hoax.


ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE FORGED PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).


For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, California Fires, Genocide), click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation)

THE HOAX: In the FORGED PG&E Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent fires in California by beaming directed energy beams from satellites in space at California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are FORGERIES.

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX
(Note: Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltdARR9nLLs (at 24:30-27:15)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eserzsHQ52o (at 9:25 - 19:10)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7...fDqAI6_zkRihzD (at 21:40- 24:35)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-P-2vg6Vk94 (at 6:00-6:40, 1:07:15 - 1:09:30)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WQfXQWHRAw (at 9:25-9:55)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMVJpcqUNUk (at 6:05-13:55).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xE9gJ5kkh4 (at 7:15 - 7:35)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3unQnNf-BlU (at 6:15-9:35)

THE FACTS:
Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power so as to comply with law.

But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received by rectennas at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for use by its customers.

WHAT PG&E ANNOUNCED IN 2009:
www.pge.com/en_US/small-medium-business/business-resource-center/energy-management-articles/energy-management-articles/past-articles/energy-from-outerspace.page?WT.mc_id=SMBNewsletter_email_20160811_phase_link-energy

Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity to PG&E, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.

THE CONTRACT:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n.../#.XJUcxVKFPIU
(at paragraphs 1-5)

https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality
(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
(at the final two paragraphs)

https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
(at the final two paragraphs)

Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has waged war against PG&E because of its "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist to blame.

CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
(Note that the subject fires began occurring in October of 2017)

This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See last 3 paragraphs & final sentence here.
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7

This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf

This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph.
https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower

This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here.
https://earthsky.org/earth/space-bas...ser-to-reality

This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62
http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf

This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph.
http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/

SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (some purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

THE FORGERIES:

1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES:
http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...fornia/YouTube

Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

2. FORGERIES THAT DEBORAH TAVARES FRAUDULENTLY ATTRIBUTES TO IMAGINARY EXPERTS TO WHOM SHE ALLEGED SENT THE FORGERIES ABOVE. AT ABOUT 20-30% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/ (Look for the terms, "comment ONE" and "comment TWO", etc.).

3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)

Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created ALL OF THE FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future energy beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

THE APPEARANCE OF THE FORGERIES
1. Each one of Deborah Tavares' FAKE emails between PG&E and CPUC contains text which consists of TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LETTER FONTS, TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LETTER SIZES, ONE OF WHICH IS IN BOLD TYPE, THE OTHER WHICH IS NOT. That means Deborah Tavares assembled each of these FAKE emails between PG&E and CPUC from two entirely different documents. Specifically, Deborah Tavares took the heading of REAL emails between PG&E and CPUC and replaced the REAL email message of those emails with a FAKE email message that she FORGED herself! Otherwise the letter font type, letter sizes and boldness of the text would be the same throughout the entire email. SEE PROOF HERE! http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...fornia/YouTube

THE CONTENT OF THE FORGERIES:
1. The subject of the of the REAL emails between PG&E and CPUC which Deborah Tavares ALTERED to fit the hoax (above) was "space weather". But, Deborah Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

"Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain" or "storm" OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth's atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why "space weather" would be of concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.

DEBORAH TAVARES' MISTAKE:

But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that "space weather" was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHIq...cVanWVBoL32K3k (at 1:00-1:25)

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

In FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "damaging space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from "damaging space weather" is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be "blamed" for the "consequences" of "damaging space weather", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any of Solaren's satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from Solaren's satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, the only thing PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a potential future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this.

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

So, in FORGING the sentence, "WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually "targeted" her in Sebastopol with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E "smart meters". See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!

Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E will never have any ability to aim Solaren's energy beams or to move Solaren's receptor stations from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual rectennas or receptor site is in Fresno, California, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n...XIlKNlKFPIU(at
the 3rd paragraph)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
(at end of 2nd paragraph)

https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower
(at the 16th paragraph)

Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas at such receiver stations are up to six miles in diameter (which would make broader than the Grand Canyon and make it obvious to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).

Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren's receptor site as "OUR" receptor site, would know that Solaren's receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren's receptor site. The foregoing stupid mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.

3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email above, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This "reminder" serves NO PURPOSE except to defraud and to set up the sentence that follows in that email.

4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about a "COVER UP" of "damaging space weather" which can cause nothing but power outages? How is it even possible for PG&E to cover up a power outage? This stupid mistake proves that this email is a forgery.

5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA EARTHLINGS" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES EVER 11 YEARS AND WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS? How is it even possible to "cover up" a power outage affecting hundreds of thousands if not millions of customers? This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE EMAILS FROM THE IMAGINARY "EXPERTS" ARE FORGERIES:

1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your 'public utilities' are doing with their (sic) 'RATE DOLLARS'", was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren's technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a potential future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren's technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" is a "signature" term REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares. FOR PROOF, GO TO 22:00-23:05 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D78hBBAH7hk and go to
36:05 - 36:15 HERE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltdARR9nLLs and go to 2:40-3:00 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASSZZE75kX0

https://www.google.com/search?ei=4uy...60.uVtaFybaRXU.

FACT: Note that the term, "EARTH, INC." (above) is a mere logical extension of "USA, INC" another "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares.
FOR PROOF, GO TO 38:05-38:25 HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrrAs5VccwA
https://www.google.com/search?source...60.JgZsHQcXzd4

3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase.
FOR PROOF, GO TO 46:50 - 47:05 HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltdARR9nLLs
and go to 35:45-35-55 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_n3v3CxQH8 and go to the FIRST WRITTEN SENTENCE ON THE SCREEN AT 46:25-46:35)
YouTube
https://www.google.com/search?ei=BO2...71.i3pL90_8tdA

4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=eO2...99.ntDizkRvUdQ

5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=0O2...99.RDgj6KM5rHk

6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=Du6...99.UcKcf4ptzag

7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=Se6...99.qaTj4TY5zhg

8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.

PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!

ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES IN SOURTHERN CALIFORNIA
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...acy-aficionado
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/1506...iracy-theorist
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/calif...b0ae32af97e953
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...810-story.html

ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES ELSEWHERE IN THE STATE
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2....a-trail-fires/
https://www.chicoer.com/2018/09/27/2...ifornia-fires/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1BA0VL
https://www.kion546.com/news/2-arres...ires/799909817
http://www.capradio.org/articles/201...lamathon-fire/
https://www.foxnews.com/us/arson-sus...-officials-say
https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-lates...ornia-wildfire
https://www.redding.com/story/news/2...es/1780261002/
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/17/cal-...on-arrest.html
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...lifornia-fires
https://www.sbsun.com/2017/08/24/man...o-is-arrested/
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/l...439032663.html
https://wtop.com/national/2018/07/th...near-yosemite/
https://www.ksbw.com/article/battlin...eason/22677894
https://people.com/crime/calif-man-s...ting-wildfire/
https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-arr...ry?id=56830037
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/l...490374161.html
https://wildfiretoday.com/2019/02/18...-clayton-fire/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/u...on-arrest.html

OTHER FACTORS
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-envir...co-los-angeles
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/e...n-human-cause/
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/...r-12294852.php
https://www.vox.com/2018/7/20/175828...guson-colorado

FACT: Not a single arsonist above used a smart meter or directed energy beam from a satellite in space to start his/her fire.

YOUTUBE VIDEO BY VIRGOTRIAD ON THIS VERY HOAX.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOj5RQKsucw

For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...-Troy-Williams)

For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970

For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...161#post229161

For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax

For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...352#post230352;
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...bra-Jones-Hoax.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

[snoop4truth]

"The Rothschilds Are Restructuring North America Hoax"

THE HOAX (THE FAKE EVIDENCE): In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that an October, 30th 2017, press release stated that the Rothschilds were "restructuring North America" itself (as in "taking it over" and "changing it").

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaDYMzQ2eFQ (at 4:50-5:00, 54:00-54:20);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U (at 32:55-34:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYkdGbLvbMg (at 2:30-5:10).

(Poor Quality Audio In The Videos Below)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAwycy_u110 (at 1:10:00-1:10:45);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8TijoQEsvw (at 31:50-32:15);

THE TRUTH: But, the subject press release DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a Rothschild company was restructuring "IN" (as in "inside") North America. A full reading of the press release indicates that the term, "restructuring'' as used in the subject press release, refers to Rothschild RESTRUCTURING DEBT (as in "re-financing"), NOT RESTRUCTURING ALL OF NORTH AMERICA ITSELF! See proof here. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300545454.html.

PURPOSE OF HOAX: The purpose of this hoax was to fraudulently create a link between the "Rothschilds" and Agenda 21, to make Americans think that the "Rothschilds" were "restructuring" all of north America under the Agenda 21 model of "sustainable development" which Deborah Tavares falsely claims will drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. For proof of this purpose, click on the links below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYkdGbLvbMg (at 1:40-2:30);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cq1NipzK-Y (at 30:45-32:55);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U (at 5:00-6:20);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAwycy_u110 (at 14:50-16:50).

CONCLUSION: The Rothschilds are not "restructuring North America". Instead, a single Rothschild company is only restructuring debt (as in "re-financing") of creditor and debtor clients INSIDE OF North America.

Video by Virgo Triad on this very hoax. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX4W...



"The Rothschilds Own All Of The Utility Companies Hoax"

THE HOAX: In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that the Rothschilds OWN all of the utility companies.

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeJkYovY0AM (at 11:00-11:20);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U (at 4:10-4:40);

THE FAKE EVIDENCE: In furtherance of this this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that she obtained a curriculum vitae (effectively a resume' for expert witnesses) attached to the sworn testimony of a member of the Rothschild family wherein he stated that "he OWNED dozens and dozens of utility companies". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf_HDda_cVs (at 7:40-14:20).

THE TRUTH: But, the subject curriculum vitae DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a "James A. Rothschild" is a financial consultant AND AN EXPERT WITNESS who has testified in dozens and dozens of court cases in which utility companies were parties (a plaintiff or a defendant). Nothing more. See pages 3-5 and pages 36-46 here. http://www.ripuc.org/eventsactions/d...hild(3.04).pdf.

PURPOSE OF HOAX: The purpose of this hoax was to create the appearance that the Rothschilds were actually in a position to use their "THEIR" utility company technologies as "weapons" to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

FACT: Logically, "James A. Rothschild" had no ownership interest of any of the utility companies named in the subject curriculum vitae above. If Rothschild had an ownership interest in those companies, then he would not have been hired as an expert witness in those cases. This is because he would have had a financial interest in the outcomes of those cases, which would have destroyed his credibility before the judge and jury. Lawyers who hire such expert witnesses only hire those whose backgrounds makes them credible witnesses, not the other way around.

Illustration Of James A. Rothschild's Role As An Expert Witness In the Court Cases Listed on his curriculum vitae

A city gives an electrical utility company a monopoly on providing city residents with electrical power. In exchange, the utility company agrees that the city will determine the rates its residents will pay for electricity. The city promises the utility that it will set rates so as to allow the utility to pay its expenses and earn a small profit, but that it will not set rates so high as to be a burden on city residents.

Years later, the city population has tripled and the utility company needs to build a larger electrical plant to meet increased demand. But, the new plant will cost millions. So, the utility company sues the city and claims that it needs a rate increase of 50% to offset its added costs of building the new plant.

In response, the city hires James A. Rothschild as an expert witness to testify AGAINST the utility company. James A. Rothschild testifies that a 50% rate increase is excessive, because the costs of the new plant can be amortized over a twenty year period which can be absorbed by a mere 5% rate increase.

By hiring James A. Rothschild to testify as an expert witness in the case, the city saved each city resident a small fortune. Note that in the case above (reflected in the link above containing the subject transcript), JAMES A. ROTHSCHILD WAS HIRED BY THE CITY TO TESTIFY AGAINST THE RATE INCREASE SOUGHT BY THE FERRY COMPANY. So, it is NOT the case that James A. Rothschild is only hired by utility companies to testify against the public and in favor of rate increases sought by utility companies.

MORE FAKE EVIDENCE: In support of this same hoax, Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that she recently attended a PG&E stockholder's meeting wherein the PG&E Board Of Directors were allegedly seated in the front row of the audience and individually introduced to the stockholders. She fraudulently claims that a person named "Rothschild" was introduced to the stockholders as a PG&E Board member (as if that would make him the "OWNER" of PG&E). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NZo...(at 3:00-3:45). But, this claim is not so.

THE TRUTH: NO PG&E BOARD MEMBER HAS SUCH A NAME. See proof here. http://www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us...directors.page.

PURPOSE OF HOAX: The purpose of this hoax was to fraudulently create a link between the "Rothschilds" and Deborah Tavares' FAKE version of Agenda 21, to make Americans think that the Rothschilds were using "THEIR" utility company technologies as "weapons" to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. For proof: of this purpose, click here.

Go to 14:50-16:30 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAwycy_u110,
Go to 30:45 - 32:55 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cq1NipzK-Y
Go to 1:40-2:30 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYkdGbLvbMg.
.
THE SOLE CONNECTION:
The sole connection that we have found between PG&E and anything "Rothschild" (person or entity) is "Roger H. Kimmel" (who is NOT a Rothschild). Kimmel was once an "INDEPENDENT" board member of PG&E (meaning he did not own or control any stock directly or indirectly in PG&E) during the same period he was a board member of Rothschild North America, Inc. (a bank). (NOTE THAT KIMMEL'S STATUS AS AN "INDEPENDENT" BOARD MEMBER OF PG&E AMOUNTS TO PROOF THAT ROTHSCHILD, NORTH AMERICA, INC., ITSELF HAD NO OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN PG&E. OTHERWISE, KIMMEL WOULD NOT HAVE QUALIFIED AS AN "INDEPENDENT" BOARD MEMBER OF PG&E.). Kimmel resigned his position with PG&E on January 14th, 2019, when PG&E filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/corpor...rnia-utility-1.

For the Rothschilds to be the sole "owners" of PG&E, they would have to own all of the stock in all of the following corporations which do own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/. For the Rothschilds to own a controlling interest in PG&E, they would have to own at least half of the stock in all of these same corporations which do own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/.

CONCLUSION:
The Rothschilds do not "own" PG&E because they do not own all of the stock of all of these corporations which do own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/. The Rothschilds do not own a controlling interest in PG&E, because they do not own at least half of the stock in all of these same corporations which do own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/. No current officer or director of PG&E has any known connection to the Rothschilds. But, even if there was, having a single friendly board member of PG&E (like "Roger H. Kimmel") DOES NOT make the Rothschilds the "OWNERS" of PG&E.


Video by Virgo Triad on this very hoax. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TgZLgkxV_s


FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #48.

COMING SOON! THE ROTHSCHILDS CONTROL THE WEATHER HOAX:
VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U(43:05-43:50)

[snoop4truth]

Post #48
Quote Posted in reply to the post by Barry: View Post
A recent guest has posted an exhaustive description of alleged hoaxes that have been put forth by Deborah Taveres. They are too long to be included in our digest, but I wanted to give you a heads up that they are here, as earlier posts in this thread.

Some of those "hoaxes" have been put forth on this website so it seems fair that their debunking is also here.

Your comments are most welcome.

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE "LONDON ACCOUNTING FIRMS WILL BANKRUPT ALL OUR CITIES HOAX"

THE HOAX:
In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that the global elite have a plan to bankrupt all of our cities by billing them excessive amounts for accounting services. She also claims that through these accounting services, the global elite have “placed a value on the air that we breathe”, "on our fresh water resources”, “on every tree in our forests” and on all of our other natural resources. Finally, she claims that this "value" is actually a "price" that we will have to pay the global elite for our air, water, trees and other natural resources. But, none of this is so.

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7i-BV1rs-c (at 2:45-12:10);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJzt...&index=13&t=0s (at 41:55-43:50 and 47:00-100:30 and the last two minutes in particular);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRRk...RihzD&index=14 (at 35:20-35:50);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2Jx...FNcjel&index=5 (at 55:10-57:00);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoEn...OCTXngmcjSCCcd (at 1:50-11:10);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoEn...OCTXngmcjSCCcd (at 7:30-14:30).


Deborah Tavares says that her factual basis for making these claims (above) is a December, 26th, 2017, newspaper article in the Press Democrat, a local Santa Rosa, California newspaper. For reasons that are now crystal clear, Deborah Tavares never posted the subject article online or provided links to it. But, she claimed it stated that Ernst & Young would bankrupt the City of Santa Rosa because the city had hired Ernst & Young to determine the amount that the city had lost as a result of the recent fires in northern California.

Deborah Tavares also says another factual basis for her claims about Ernst & Young is the Ernst & Young website which indicates that it is a 200 year old, international accounting firm based in London which serves international clients. But then, Deborah Tavares claims that the website indicates that Ernst & Young is the "global value determinator" which places a value on all of the Earth's "natural capital" (natural resources) and that Ernst & Young is really acting on behalf of international bankers.

BACKGROUND:

ERNST & YOUNG: Ernst & Young is a London based firm which offers a number of professional services to governments and businesses, including accounting, legal and risk assessment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_%26_Young. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/who-we-are.

THE LAW: When American cities, counties or states incur financial losses in a natural disaster, they may REQUEST REIMBURSEMENT from the federal government (FEMA) and any state counterpart. But, FEMA requires AUDITED accounting of all amounts sought in REIMBURSEMENT. Further, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE and EXPERTISE is required to prepare the federal REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS and in appealing any FEMA denials for REIMBURSEMENT.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5121 (SCROLL DOWN TO SECTION "(b).");
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/2/part-2600;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federa...gement_Agency;


THE SUBJECT NEWSPAPER ARTICLE:

The Press Democrat
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 26, 2018. Santa Rosa, California. PRESSDEMOCRAT.COM
[From page 1.]
…
SR tapping reserves for fire consultant
By WILL SCHMIDT
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Santa Rosa will dig further into its budget reserves to pay an additional $813,000 to the disaster recovery consultant it retained after the October 2017 fires. The extension approved by the Santa Rosa City Council last week retains London-based consulting firm Ernst & Young through May and brings the total maximum value of the contract to $2.3 million. The cost of the extension was not included in the city’s current budget forecast, which had estimated Santa Rosa would have $6.5 million in reserves.

The cost of fire damage and the resulting recovery efforts have eaten into the city’s reserve funding and exacerbated the strain of Santa Rosa’s existing budget deficit, though the city’s funding woes were buoyed somewhat by the passage of a quarter-cent sales tax hike approved by voters in November. That tax increase will take effect in April.

Ernst & Young, which has an office in San Francisco, was hired in December 2017 to help local officials assess damage from the 2017 wildfires, request reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and represent the city in [reimbursement] talks with FEMA and the California Office Of Emergency Services. Ernst & Young also worked with the city and another outside adviser, Hagerty Consulting, to assess the city's unmet disaster needs, a figure estimated at about $400 million.

Much of Ernst & Young’s efforts have been behind the scenes, but the city recently revealed an online tracker developed in coordination with the consultant (http:/bit.ly/SRFEMA) reflecting the city’s disaster recovery requests [for reimbursement] to FEMA. The city has documented 32 projects with a combined estimated damage of about 66.5 million. FEMA has reimbursed about $2.8 in disaster costs so far. Ernst & Young will continue to help the city appeal four requests [for reimbursement which FEMA denied] for about $17 million that FEMA initially deemed ineligible for reimbursement.

City Manager Sean McGlynn told the city council last week that the contract extension would be the last one between Santa Rosa and Ernst & Young for this disaster recovery [reimbursement] contract. He noted that Santa Rosa’s efforts to secure reimbursements will be far from finished once the contract is up.

“There is going to be a huge amount of time and energy spent by staff in managing this.” McGlynn said.
The city expects state and FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT FOR MOST OF THE COSTS of the Ernst & Young contract according to a staff report. [This means that FEMA will reimburse the city except for that TINY PORTION of Ernst & Young's fees associated with the city's reimbursement requests for lost city property that was NEVER ELIGIBLE for reimbursement by FEMA in the first place.] The report also noted that while the city’s budget reserves are depleted, there is sufficient funding to pay out the contract [WHICH WILL BE REIMBURSED BY FEMA ANYWAY].

The city council is set to consider budget cuts and hold a public hearing on city spending priorities as part of its January 29th meeting
___________________________________________________________________
You can reach Staff Writer Will Schmidt at 707-521-5207 or will.schmidt@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @usreports.

NO CITY IN THE UNITED STATES IS GOING BANKRUPT as a result of hiring Ernst & Young to assess fire damage or to assist in obtaining reimbursement from FEMA!

What Deborah Tavares did not know when creating this hoax is under the law, the "ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS" that a city, county or state incurs in their efforts to obtain REIMBURSEMENT from FEMA ARE ALSO THEMSELVES REIMBURSED BY FEMA (not just the value of the city-owned property destroyed in the disaster). https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=...1569448744183; https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/part-207. That means under the law, the costs of Ernst & Young's accounting services ARE THEMSELVES REIMBURSED BY FEMA and ULTIMATELY COST THE CITY NOTHING WHATSOEVER! But, Deborah Tavares does not know enough to even realize this.

BELOW ARE THE "ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS" THAT FEMA REIMBURSES CITIES FOR (NOT JUST THE COSTS OF CITY- OWNED PROPERTY DESTROYED IN THE DISASTER).



Typical Direct Administrative Cost Activities


Site inspections
Developing the detailed site-specific damage description
Evaluating Section 406 hazard mitigation measures
Preparing Projects
Preparing documents to support a claim [to FEMA for reimbursement]
Requesting disbursement of Public Assistance [FEMA] funds
NOTE THAT ALL OF THESE SERVICES ARE THE VERY SAME SERVICES THAT ERNST & YOUNG RENDERS TO THE CITY UNDER THE CONTRACT. SO, UNDER THE LAW, FEMA WILL REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR ALL OF THE COSTS OF ERNST & YOUNG'S CONTRACTUAL SERVICES!

After all, it is FEMA itself which requires the "AUDITING" services of third-party accounting firms, like Ernst & Young, in the first place (to provide reliable, "AUDITED" information to FEMA so as to make certain that FEMA does not over-reimburse or under-reimburse cities, counties and states after disasters). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/2/part-2600. So, it is only fair that FEMA pay for those costs.

That means that The City Of Santa Rosa will NOT go bankrupt as a result of hiring Ernst & Young or similar firms to perform AUDITED, certified accounting of disaster losses. That also means that no other city, county or state in the United States which hires firms like Ernst & Young will go bankrupt either. This is because under the law, all of the costs of such accounting services are "ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS" which are reimbursed by FEMA.

FACT: In order for Ernst & Young to do its job (in obtaining reimbursement for cities, counties and states, etc.), it necessarily has to place a “value” on all damaged or destroyed city-owned property (infrastructure, roads, bridges, buildings, utilities, public lands). There is nothing diabolical or nefarious about that. A city cannot obtain reimbursement from FEMA without determining the amount to be reimbursed, which is dependent on the "value" of damaged or destroyed city-owned property, a value determined by Ernst & Young).

But, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that Ernst & Young is acting on behalf of the global elite to “place a value on the air that we breathe”, "on our fresh water resources”, "on every tree in our forests" and on all of our other natural resources. But, nothing in the article (or elsewhere) suggests that Ernst & Young has or will place a “value” on the air, water or on every tree in the forests, etc.

Deborah Tavares claims that this process of Ernst & Young placing a ”value” on the air, the water and on all other natural resources is currently going on across the globe in order to enslave all of mankind into paying for the natural resources that they already have.

Deborah Tavares falsely claims that the “value” that Ernst & Young places on all of these natural resources is actually a “price” that all of mankind will have to pay to the global elite in exchange for these natural resources.

Finally, Deborah Tavares falsely claims that local governments (like The City Of Santa Rosa) will act as “collection agents” for the global elite in this regard and will levy new taxes on all of mankind to pay the global elite for all of these natural resources (on which Ernst & Young has allegedly placed a "value"). But, none of this is so.

CONCLUSION:
For reasons stated above, all of Deborah Tavares' claims are veritably false. Ernst & Young does not bankrupt cities. Ernst & Young assists cities by helping them collect reimbursement from FEMA for the value of destroyed city-owned property and other reimbursable losses caused by such disasters. And ultimately, Ernst & Young's services cost cities nothing whatsoever, BECAUSE UNDER THE LAW THE COSTS OF ERNST & YOUNG'S ACCOUNTING SERVICES ARE THEMSELVES A COST REIMBURSED BY FEMA. Finally, Ernst & Young does not "place a value on the air that we breathe", "the water we drink" or place a value on "every tree in our forests". Instead, Ernst & Young only places a value on destroyed city-owned property and other reimbursable losses caused by such disasters.

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #53.

[snoop4truth]

NOTE: Al Whitney's ("Anita Laurin's) website, anticorruptionsociety.com has been taken down. So, some of the links below no longer work. Fortunately, the links below to the most important documents (which are PDF's or which Al Whitney uploaded to other websites) still work well.

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN THE HOAX, QUOTING HER OWN FORGERY (QUOTING HERSELF) WHILE PRETENDING THAT HER OWN WORDS ARE THE WORDS OF A "RETIRED FEDERAL JUDGE":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (AT 42:10-49:15);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (AT 7:15-7:55, 27:00-27:55, 31:15-33:10, 45:05-46:00, 52:35-53:45, 54:35-54:50);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (AT 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIP751weIOY (AT 25:00-25:45).

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES PLUGGING AND PEDDLING HER OWN FORGERY:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRPSszg1YYM (AT 46:35-47:40);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASSZZE75kX0 (AT 9:10-11:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (AT 51:50-53:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81qlF5v3WY8 (AT 7:00-7:25);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (AT 2:20-2:40);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (AT 34:20-36:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 (AT 1:30-1:45);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIP751weIOY (AT 8:25-8:40).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPISSEErIs4 (AT 2:20-2:40).


THE JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (FAKE BOOKS):
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....ours-nov-2.pdf (SEE LIST OF AUTHORS AT BOTTOM OF 2ND PAGE).

OTHER JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (ARTICLES):
Note that most of the other Judge "DALE” FORGERIES posted online are mere re-prints of "section five" of “The Great American Adventure” UNDER DIFFERENT NAMES (“Retired Federal Judge Spills The Beans”, “Legal Advice From A Retired Judge Turned Whistle Blower”, etc.).

"SPILLS THE BEANS" FORGERIES:
https://mainerepublicemailalert.file...-the-beans.pdf (Note the TITLE);
https://scannedretina.com/2013/05/06...he-beans/(note the TITLE);
https://mobile.twitter.com/OPPTInNow...37110874140672 (note the TILE).

"WHISTLEBLOWER" FORGERIES:
https://livingintheprivate.blogspot....for-court.html (scroll down to about 50% through the text of this page to the line immediately above the link in ALL BLUE TYPE for the term, "WHISTLEBLOWER" and "JUDGE DALE");
https://www.educatedinlaw.org/wp-con...he-Private.pdf (scroll down to about 95% through the textof this page to the line immediately above the link in ALL BLUE TYPE for the term, "WHISTLEBLOWER" and "JUDGE DALE").

TIME LINE:
Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class (as "Judge DALE" ) and Al Whitney HAVE BEEN COLLABERATING on hoaxes SINCE AT LEAST APRIL 10, 2010, the ACTUAL DATE on which Deborah Tavares, herself, POSTED THE FOLLOWING "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY ON HER OWN WEBSITE. http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. In January 2011, Al Whitney posted the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (EXPOSED IN POST #53) on wordpress.com. Since that date, Deborah Tavares and her partners have PUBLICLY CREDITED Rodney "DALE" Class (NOT "JUDGE DALE") with the "discovery" of that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY. For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. But, a year later in 2012, Deborah Tavares, without thinking it through, incorporated that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (which she had publicly credited to Rod Class) into a book which she claims was written by "Judge DALE". See page 5 here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Sometimes, it is hard for Deborah Tavares to keep all of her lies straight.

THE HOAX:
"Judge DALE" is a hoax. This is the reason that you have never actually seen a photo, video or live appearance of "Judge DALE". He does not exist. The people pretending to be "Judge DALE" in the "Judge DALE forgeries" and online are Deborah Tavares, Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney DALE Class, the namesake of "Judge DALE".

Beginning in April 10, 2010, Deborah Tavares, Anita Larin (AKA "Al Whitney") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney "DALE" Class began publishing a series of FAKE "legal" books which revealed FAKE "legal" information WHICH THEY HAD WRITTEN THEMSLEVES. But, they fraudulently told the American people that these FORGERIES were written by a FAKE "retired federal judge" named, "Judge DALE" (which uses Rodney "DALE" Class' middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke on the American people).

The "Judge DALE Forgeries" include: "The Matrix And The US Constitution" (2010); "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" (2012) and "Lawfully Yours" (2014). But, excerpts of these FORGERIES are posted all over the web as articles or comments. (See links above.).

In the "Judge DALE forgeries", Deborah Tavares, Anita Larin (AKA "Al Whitney") and Rodney "DALE" Class (all while pretending to be "Judge DALE") falsely claimed that the American legal system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt and diabolical. Specifically, Tavares and her partners claimed, among other things, that ALL GOVERNMENTS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (including the courts) are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" and that ALL AMERICAN LAWYERS are actually working for the international bankers, foreign traitors who have sworn an oath to the Queen, non-American citizens, double agents, communists, Satanists, imposters, unlicensed, unqualified, uneducated, self-appointed, illegal, invalid, corrupt, diabolical and THE ENEMY OF ALL MANKIND. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that the American justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT Americans.

ADMISSION:
Deborah Tavares has already privately ADMITTED this to us. So, no further evidence is necessary to establish that my claims about this hoax are true. But, I will provide that further evidence anyway.

THE NAME:
Rodney "DALE" Class and Judge "DALE" JUST HAPPEN TO HAVE THE VERY SAME NAME (A TRULY INCREDIBLE COINCIDENCE)!

What are the odds of that?

RODNEY "DALE" CLASS' INTERNET RADIO SHOW:
Rodney "DALE" Class has his own homemade, internet radio show on AIB Talkshoe Radio (spelled correctly). The content of Class' radio show is simply A PRE-RECORDED "CONFERENCE CALL" which Class made earlier. Click here. https://www.talkshoe.com/show/aib-radio/reviews .

Ironically, Judge "DALE" ALSO JUST HAPPENS TO HOST "CONFERENCE CALLS", A TRULY INCREDIBLE COINCIDENCE! See proof here. (Look for BOTH the terms, "JUDGE DALE" and "CONFERENCE CALL" in the 1st full paragraph in the following link.). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....reset-and.html

What are the odds of that?

On his radio show and online, Rodney "DALE" Class falsely claims that all governments and government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS". See poof here. (Look for the term, "ROD CLASS" and the term, "CORPORATION" in the TITLE of this article. https://globalfreedommovement.org/ex...ith-rod-class/. On his radio show and in his videos, Rodney "DALE" Class also recommends that the public sue their ELECTED representatives and their agencies in ADMINISTRATIVE COURT using the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. See proof here. (Read the description paragraph BELOW THE TITLE in of the following videos.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDNogI6nBGU; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdYzJBFfhqU

Ironically, "Judge DALE" ALSO JUST HAPPENS to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" and ALSO JUST HAPPENS to recommend that the public sue their ELECTED representatives and their agencies in ADMINITRATIVE COURT using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS", an incredible coincidence! See proof here. (Look for the terms, "JUDGE DALE", "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" and "CORPORATIONS" in the first 5 full paragraphs in the following link.). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....d-further.html. (Look for the terms, "JUDGE DALE", "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" and "CORPORATIONS" in the first 5 full paragraphs in the following link.). http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U..._printer.shtml

What are the odds of that?

ANALYSIS:
ALL COMBINED, the text in the SEVEN immediately preceding links PROVE that not only do Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" have the SAME NAME, BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" JUST HAPPEN to do and say THE VERY SAME THINGS! Specifically, they BOTH JUST HAPPEN TO HOST "CONFERENCE CALLS" (A TRULY INCREDIBLE COINICDENCE!), they BOTH JUST HAPPEN to falsely claim that all governments and all government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" (another amazing coincidence!) and they BOTH JUST HAPPEN to recommend that the public sue their ELECTED representatives and their agencies IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" (still yet, another amazing coincidence!).

What are the odds of that?

FACT:
Further, Rod Class' own personal court filings JUST HAPPEN TO CONTAIN the same exact language, same exact phrases, same irrelevant case citations ("Clearfield Trust", etc.) and contain the same exact stupid mistakes that appear in the "Judge DALE" forgeries.

What are the odds of that?

FACT:
Not surprisingly, BOTH Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney ALSO JUST HAPPEN to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" (yet, another amazing coincidence!). Indeed, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney were so supportive of that single false claim that they actually created THEIR OWN SEPARATE HOAX in support of that single proposition. THE FULL EXPLANATION OF THAT HOAX APPEARS IN POST #63 below. See Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney engaged in that hoax here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-qlZCp9rdI

What are the odds of that?

THE "SIGNATURE" TERM "MATRIX" APPEARS IN THE TITLE OF THIS "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY:
http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. NOTE THAT DEBORAH TAVARES HERSELF POSTED THIS "MATRIX" COLLABERATION ON HER OWN PERSONAL WEBSITE ON APRIL 10, 2010.

THE "MATRIX":
Note that the title of the immediately preceding "Judge DALE forgery" (above) is "The 'MATRIX' And The US Constitution". This term, "MATRIX", is extremely significant because Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class, Judge "DALE" and Al Whitney ALL JUST HAPPEN to use this "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", over and over in their online hoaxes. The following links provide EXCELLENT EXAMPLES of their use of the "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", in their online hoaxes. (See Post #100 for a similar use of the "SIGNATURE" term, "BOMBSHELL".).

RODNEY "DALE" CLASS HAPPENS TO USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM "MATRIX" IN HIS PERSONAL VIDEO HOAXES. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=22s (Go to :30 - :45 and see an actual photo of Rodney "DALE" Class (the REAL "Judge DALE") actually standing inside the "MATRIX" as described in the immediately preceding forgery entitled, "The MATRIX and the US Constitution", allegedly by "Judge DALE");

NOT SURPRISINGLY, JUDGE "DALE" ALSO JUST ALSO HAPPENS TO USE THE SIGNATURE TERM "MATRIX" IN THIS HOAXES.
http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. (NOTE "MATRIX" IN THE TITLE AND THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);
http://howtoexitthematrix.com/2015/0...by-judge-dale/. (NOTE "MATRIX" IN THE TITLE AND THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);
http://www.matrixfiles.com/Dale/TheG...ture-PART1.pdf. (NOTE THE "MATRIX" IN NAME OF THIS WEBSITE AND NOTE THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);
http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com/201...e-america.html. (SCROLL DOWN TO THE "MATRIX" AND NOTE THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);


NOT SURPRISINGLY, DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY ALSO JUST HAPPEN TO USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM "MATRIX" IN THEIR HOAXES. Note: Due to this very post, Deborah Tavares has recently panicked and has taken down over a dozen of her YouTube videos which contained the terms, "Deborah Tavares" and "Matrix". But, evidence of her use of the term, "MATRIX" still remains.

DEBORAH TAVARES' "MATRIX" HOAXES:
https://www.google.com/search?source...60._V_qcybMjZs Click and SCROLL DOWN. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
https://www.google.com/search?ei=jFc...60.tuxHvVr43HA Click and SCROLL DOWN. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX5IJMevyP8 (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XRkZ4pVCLbOg/ (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (at 27:00-27:15);
http://www.oom2.com/t34873-jeff-rens...ing-the-matrix. (SCROLL DOWN to TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
http://howtoexitthematrix.com/tag/deborah-tavares/ (Note Website Name "MATRIX" & Speaker Name );
http://cover-upz.blogspot.com/2013/0...-document.html See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ron-rec...p-the-crimenet (See the FIRST FULL SENTENCE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x33at9f (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/...cument_matrix/ (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" ;
https://noliesradio.org/archives/134062. (note "QUANTUM MATRIX RADIO".);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsPSju_E1k (LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO. It is a Deborah Tavares "MATRIX" video from which she has deleted her name.).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eR...Q&index=6&t=0s (LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO. It is a Deborah Tavares "MATRIX" video.).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtefEiriQVM (See DESCRIPTION below title);


AL WHITNEY' "MATRIX" HOAXES:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyzbkN7ClHM (See the TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );


NOTE: Note that Rodney "DALE" Class (in his "MATRIX" VIDEO above), "Judge DALE" (in the FORGERY entitled, "The MATRIX And The US Constitution" above), Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney (in their ARTICLES, WEBSITES and VIDEOS above) ALL JUST HAPPEN to use the same, shared, common, UNIQUE, "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", in the wording of their online HOAXES, another amazing coincidence! See Post #100 for a similar use of the "SIGNATURE" term, "BOMBSHELL".).


What are the odds of that?

FACT:
BOTH DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY JUST HAPPEN TO POST THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON BOTH OF THEIR OWN WEBSITES. THIS PROVES THAT "BOTH" DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY JUST HAPPEN TO BE AFFILIATED WITH, APPROVE OF, SUPPORT, PUBLISH AND FEATURE THE WORK OF BOTH "JUDGE DALE" AND ROD CLASS ON THEIR OWN WEBSITES, an amazing coincidence.

WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT?

THE WEBSITE OF DEBORAH TAVARES:
Note that Deborah Tavares posted the following "Judge DALE" forgery on her own website. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...VENTURE.pdf.On page FIVE (5) of this particular "Judge DALE" forgery, you will find the "COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM" DIAGRAM (EXPOSED IN POST # 53 ABOVE). Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and Al Whitney have all publicly credited Rod Class with "discovering" that particular document, NOT "JUDGE DALE". For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. (Deborah Tavares herself publicly credited Rod Class with discovering that particular document in her EPIC YouTube video which she has recently taken down. So, no links to that video are currently available). This means that by her own admission, the work of BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" are published on her own website, because the work of BOTH appear in the following "Judge DALE forgery" which Deborah Tavares herself posted on her own website. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (See page 5 of this "Judge DALE forgery" for work that Deborah Tavares has publicly attributed to Rod Class).

What are the odds of that?

THE WEBSITE OF AL WHITNEY:
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...e-dale/page/2/. (actually a Rodney "DALE" Class link);
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/judge-dale-part-5/.(a Judge "DALE" link);
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/rod-class/. (a Rodney "DALE" Class https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/.(a Judge "DALE" link at right column at 80% through text);
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...ey-dale-class/ .(a Rodney "DALE" Class link);
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/.(a Judge "DALE" link);
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...ey-dale-class/ .(a Rodney "DALE" Class link);

NOTE IN THE LINKS ABOVE THAT BOTH DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY JUST HAPPEN TO POST THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON BOTH OF THEIR OWN WEBSITES. THIS PROVES THAT DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY BOTH JUST HAPPEN TO BE AFFILIATED WITH, APPROVE OF, SUPPORT, PUBLISH AND FEATURE THE WORK OF BOTH "JUDGE DALE" AND ROD CLASS ON THEIR OWN WEBSITES, an amazing coincidence!

AND, WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT?

ANALYSIS:
Of all of Deborah Tavares' hoaxes, the "Judge DALE" Hoax is perhaps her most diabolical. As a result of this single hoax, millions of Americans WERE INCITED TO THE POINT OF HATRED AND VIOLENCE against INNOCENT Americans. As a result of this single hoax, countless thousands of Americans have WASTED years of their lives, thousands of dollars of their own money, all of their resources and all of their energy FIGHTING AN IMAGINARY ENEMY (an imaginary Satanic and diabolical justice system described in her forgeries) which is NOT REAL, using IMAGINARY LAWS (described in her forgeries) which are NOT REAL, by employing the legal teachings of an IMAGINARY "RETIRED FEDERAL JUDGE DALE" (described in her forgeries) who is NOT REAL.

As a result of this single hoax, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Americans HAVE LOST THEIR OWN COURT CASES and as a result, actually LOST their own time, LOST their own homes, LOST their own money, LOST their own property, LOST their own liberty AND PERHAPS EVEN LOST THEIR OWN LIVES IN RELIANCE UPON THE FALSE LEGAL CLAIMS IN THE "JUDGE DALE" FORGERIES.

CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', THE "JUDGE DALE FORGERIES" DO NOT REFLECT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM OR ABOUT AMERICAN LAWYERS.

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #63.

FOR THE HOAXES OF ROD CLASS, CLICK HERE. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...is-many-hoaxes.

FOR THE HOAXES OF EDDIE CRAIG, CLICK HERE. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...y-sheriff-hoax

FOR THE HOAXES OF ANTHONY WILLIAMS, CLICK HERE. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...Troy-Williams)

FOR THE HOAXES OF DEBRA JONES, CLICK HERE. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...352#post230352

FOR THE HOAXES OF CARL MILLER, CLICK HERE. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...chard-Champion


BELOW IS THE CRIMINAL HISTORY OF ONE OF DEBORAH TAVARES' PARTNERS IN CREATING & PUBLICIZING HOAXES.

CLICK ON THE ATTACHMENT BELOW. THEN, CLICK ON THE POP-UP WHICH WILL APPEAR AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF YOUR COMPUTER SCREEN. THEN, SCROLL ALL THE WAY DOWN.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Class' Criminal Highlights.pdf (1.86 MB, 429 views)



What follows is a mid-length explanation of that hoax for those who want more facts.

DEBORAH TAVARES & "THE JUDGE DALE HOAX"

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN THE HOAX. (In many of these videos, Deborah Tavares actually quotes her own forgery (quotes herself), but fraudulently claims her words are the words of "Judge DALE"):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (AT 42:10-49:15);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (AT 7:15-7:55, 27:00-27:55, 31:15-33:10, 45:05-46:00, 52:35-53:45, 54:35-54:50);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (AT 34:20-36:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 ( AT 1:30-1:45);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (AT 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (AT 51:50-53:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81qlF5v3WY8 (AT 7:00-7:25);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (AT 2:20-2:40).

THE FORGERIES (BOOKS):
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE);
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....bk-format1.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE);
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....th-edition.pdf (SEE LIST OF AUTHORS AT BOTTOM OF 2ND PAGE).

THE HOAX: "Judge DALE" is a hoax. This is the reason that you have never actually seen a photo, video or live appearance of "Judge DALE". He does not exist. The people pretending to be "Judge DALE" in the "Judge DALE forgeries" and online are Deborah Tavares, Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney DALE Class, the namesake of "Judge DALE".

ADMISSION:
DEBORAH TAVARES HAS ALREADY ADMITTED THIS TO US!

In "THE JUDGE DALE HOAX", Deborah Tavares, Anita Larin (AKA "Al Whitney") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney "DALE" Class wrote and published a series of FAKE "legal" books which revealed FAKE "legal" information WHICH THEY ACTUALLY CREATED THEMSLEVES. But, they fraudulently told the American people these FORGERIES were written by a FAKE "retired federal judge" named, "Judge DALE" (which uses Rodney "DALE" Class' middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke on the American people).

The "Judge DALE Forgeries" include: "The Matrix And The US Constitution" (2010); "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" (2012) and "Lawfully Yours" (2014). But, excerpts of these FORGERIES are posted all over the web as articles or comments. (See links above.).

In the "Judge DALE forgeries", Deborah Tavares, Anita Larin (AKA "Al Whitney") and Rodney "DALE" Class (all while pretending to be "Judge DALE") falsely claimed that the American legal system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt and diabolical. Specifically, Tavares and her partners claimed, among other things, that all governments and all governmental agencies (including the courts) are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" and that all American lawyers are actually working for the international bankers, foreign traitors who have sworn an oath to the Queen, non-American citizens, double agents, communists, Satanists, imposters, unlicensed, unqualified, uneducated, self-appointed, illegal, invalid, corrupt, diabolical and THE ENEMY OF ALL MANKIND. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that the American justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT Americans.

Of all of Tavares' hoaxes, the "Judge DALE" Hoax is perhaps her most diabolical. As a result of this single hoax, millions of Americans WERE INCITED TO THE POINT OF HATRED AND VIOLENCE against INNOCENT Americans. As a result of this single hoax, countless thousands of Americans have WASTED years of their lives, thousands of dollars of their own money, all of their resources and all of their energy FIGHTING AN IMAGINARY ENEMY (an imaginary Satanic and diabolical justice system described in her forgeries) which is NOT REAL, using IMAGINARY LAWS (described in her forgeries) which are NOT REAL, by employing the legal teachings of an IMAGINARY "RETIRED FEDERAL JUDGE DALE" (described in her forgeries) who is NOT REAL.

As a result of this single hoax, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Americans HAVE LOST THEIR OWN COURT CASES and as a result, actually LOST their own time, LOST their own homes, LOST their own money, LOST their own property, LOST their own liberty AND PERHAPS EVEN LOST THEIR OWN LIVES IN RELIANCE UPON THE FALSE LEGAL CLAIMS IN THE "JUDGE DALE" FORGERIES.

CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', THE "JUDGE DALE FORGERIES" DO NOT REFLECT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM OR ABOUT AMERICAN LAWYERS.

There is simply no end to the INTENTIONAL FRAUD of Deborah Tavares.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Post #53

NOTE: Al Whitney's ("Anita Laurin's) website, anticorruptionsociety.com has been taken down. So, some of the links below no longer work. Fortunately, the links below to the most important documents (which are PDF's or which Al Whitney uploaded to other websites) still work well.

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX:

VIDEO OF DEBORAH TAVARES' PARTNERS ENGAGED IN THIS HOAX.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ruq2LMDCcg (Here, Al Whitney, Rod Class and a co-conspirator pretend to be "shocked" while reviewing their OWN FORGERY).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxCIJZI74Oo
(Here, Al Whitney, Rod Class and a co-conspirator pretend to be "shocked" while reviewing their OWN FORGERY).

NOTE: Because Deborah Tavares found out that I was going to expose this particular hoax, she panicked and took down her epic YouTube video wherein she spent hours engaged in this hoax and wherein she pretended to be "shocked" and "horrified" by her FAKE government document (which she herself actually created). It was absolutely priceless! It was TRULY OSCAR WORTHY!


ARTICLES PEDDLING THE HOAX:
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/ (A fraudulent article. Note website.)
https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/ (Note the author of this fraudulent article.)
https://i-uv.com/court-registry-investment-system-cris

THE FINISHED FORGERY:
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE.).

TIME LINE:
Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class (as "Judge DALE" ) and Al Whitney HAVE BEEN COLLABERATING on hoaxes SINCE AT LEAST APRIL 10, 2010, the ACTUAL DATE on which Deborah Tavares, herself, POSTED THE FOLLOWING "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY ON HER OWN WEBSITE. http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. In January 2011, Al Whitney posted the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (THE FORGERY EXPOSED HERE) on wordpress.com. Since that date, Deborah Tavares and her partners have PUBLICLY CREDITED Rodney "DALE" Class (NOT "JUDGE DALE") with the "discovery" of that "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY. For proof, Scroll down to just above the video here. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/. For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. But, a year later in 2012, Deborah Tavares, without thinking it through, incorporated that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (which she had publicly credited to Rod Class) into a book which she claims was written by "Judge DALE". See page 5 here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Sometimes, Deborah Tavares has a hard time keeping all of her lies straight.

THE HOAX:
In "THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX", Deborah Tavares and her partners (including Rod Class, Al Whitney and Jeanette Triplett) fraudulently claimed to have "discovered" a "secret" or "leaked" government document which she claims "PROVES" that ALL OF THE MONEY that the public ever pays to the courts in FINES and PENALTIES is forwarded on to the "Federal Reserve" to keep (in the same way the IRS collects money from income earners and allegedly forwards it to the Federal Reserve to keep). The purpose of this hoax (like the "Judge DALE Hoax") was to make Americans think that the American justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT Americans.

To carry out this hoax, Deborah Tavares and her partners fraudulently MANUFACTURED a FAKE document to support of their hoax (just like they did with all three of the "Judge DALE FORGERIES" ) and they made their forgery LOOK like an official government document. BUT, THEY MADE SOME STUPID MISTAKES shown below!

IMPORTANT LEGAL BACKGROUND:
Most state and federal court houses have a "COURT REGISTRY". A court registry is a court-supervised, escrow-type account managed at an office in the court house. In extremely rare cases (when the ownership or right to money is in dispute), litigants voluntarily (and temporarily) deposit money into the court registry until their case is over at which time the judge orders the clerk to pay the money deposited to the winning side in the case. ALL OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A COURT REGISTRY GOES ONLY TO THE LITIGANTS THEMSELVES. NO OTHER PARTY OF ANY TYPE EVER KEEPS ANY OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A COURT REGISTERY. Less than one percent of all cases involve such a deposit into a "Court Registry". So, such deposits are extremely rare. (Have you ever made a deposit into a "Court Registry"?)

ILLUSTRATION OF HOW A COURT REGISTRY ACTUALLY WORKS (a REAL case):
A car owner obtains a written repair estimate of $1,000 from a repair shop and on that basis, puts his car into the repair shop for repairs. When the owner returns to pick up his repaired car, the repair shop refuses to release it to the owner unless the owner pays the repair shop $2,000 for the repairs.

But, the car owner knows the law. So, he goes to the court house and deposits $2,000 into the court registry (the total amount in dispute), obtains a receipt for that deposit and obtains a court order which requires the repair shop to immediately release his repaired car to him on the grounds that all of the money sought by the repair shop (all $2,000) is safe and is on deposit in the court registry.

A month later at the trial, the judge rules that the repair shop is bound by its written repair estimate of $1,000 and orders the clerk to pay the repair shop $1,000 (the amount of the original repair estimate) and to refund $1,000 to the car owner (the amount of the overcharge). Thus, only the litigants themselves receive the money that is deposited into a court registry.

By voluntarily (and temporarily) depositing money into the court registry BEFORE the case began, the car owner got to use his car while waiting for his court case to be resolved, 30 days. If the car owner had not voluntarily deposited money into the court registry, he would not have been able to use his car for this 30 day period. So, the purpose of a court registry is to BENEFIT and PROTECT the litigants themselves.

THE COURT REGISTRY "INVESTMENT SYSTEM"
Courts are not banks. So, courts themselves must deposit money deposited into their court registries into banks or other financial institutions. In so doing, courts earn "interest" on those deposits. But, depositing court registry money into commercial banks is risky. Banks can fail and the interest rates that banks pay on deposits are very low. To remedy these two problems, Congress passed the Court Registry Investment System Act. Under this Act, federal courts now "deposit" their court registry money into the U.S. Treasury because, unlike banks, the U.S. Treasury cannot fail and because the interest rates that the U.S. Treasury pays on those “deposits” is higher than the interest rates paid by banks.

That means the Court Registry “INVESTMENT SYSTEM” is about the courts EARNING INTEREST (ONLY) on court registry deposits. It has NOTHING to do with the PRINCIPLE amount of money deposited into a court registry, because all of that money belongs only to litigants themselves. But, Deborah Tavares and her partners do not know enough to even realize this.

THE FORGERY:
Deborah Tavares and her partners found a REAL government document reflecting a REAL CASH FLOW DIAGRAM accurately depicting how the "Court Registry Investment System" actually works (described above).This diagram graphically depicted (with both DRAWINGS and WORDS): 1). a litigant depositing money into a court registry; 2). the court "depositing" that money into the U.S. Treasury (ACTUALLY SHOWING A DRAWING WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED THE “UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING”); 3). the U.S. Treasury returning that money to the court; and 4). the court paying that money to the winning litigant in the case. (Obviously, Deborah Tavares and her partners overlooked this final step in the diagram, THE RETURN OF ALL OF THE MONEY DEPOSITED TO THE WINNING LITIGANT IN THE CASE.). See the current (ALTERED) version of that diagram here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

But, the original (UNALTERED) version of the "CASH FLOW DIAGRAM" did not incite hatred or violence against innocent Americans. So, in order to incite that hatred and violence against innocent Americans, Deborah Tavares and her partners FRAUDULENTLY ALTERED the original diagram to make it look like the courts collect money from litigants AND THEN FORWARD IT TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO KEEP (to create the illusion that the courts are merely “collection agents” for the Federal Reserve). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Specifically, Deborah Tavares and her partners fraudulently deleted the original label on the diagram which originally read, "UNITED STATES TREASURY (UST)” (UNDER THE DRAWING WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED THE "UNITED STATE TREASURY BUILDING") and they FRAUDULENTLY replaced that ORIGINAL LABEL with a FAKE label which now reads, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)”. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

We know the current words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” which now appear in the diagram were FORGED because of THE TINY WORDS STILL INSIDE THE ARROW ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE DIAGRAM WHICH DEBORAH TAVARES AND HER PARTNERS OBVIOUSLY OVERLOOKED. These words read, “DEPOSIT IN TREASURY” (referring to courts depositing court registry money into the U.S. Treasury, not depositing money into the Federal Reserve “BANK” as the diagram now reads). Note also that the tiny arrow on the left side of the diagram POINTS DIRECTLY TO THE DRAWING IN THE CENTER OF THE DIAGRAM WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTS THE “UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING” (not the Federal Reserve “BANK”). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

We also know that the current words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because they are THE ONLY WORDS ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DIAGRAM which consist SOLELY OF ALL CAPITAL LETTERS (an inconsistency that a real government document would not contain). Not even the TITLE of the diagram appears in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Likewise, we also know that the words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because they are THE ONLY WORDS ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DIAGRAM which consist SOLELY OF LARGER, BOLD-FACED TYPE (an inconsistency that a real government document would not contain). Not even the TITLE of the diagram appears in LARGER, BOLD-FACED TYPE. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Note that it was a similar stupid mistake which led to the discovery that Deborah Tavares' emails were FORGED in the "FORGED PG&E Email Hoax" which is explained on page one of this thread. And, PATTERNS OF CONDUCT NEVER LIE!

We also know that the words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because the federal government DOES NOT refer to the "Federal Reserve SYSTEM" or the "Federal Reserve BUILDING" in Washington, D.C. as the "Federal Reserve BANK" (a stupid mistake that a real government document would not contain). https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf. There is NO SINGLE "Federal Reserve BANK". Instead, there are 12 regional "Federal Reserve Banks", none of which look anything like the "United States Treasury Building" WHICH IS UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED IN THE DIAGRAM.

Note that it was a similar stupid mistake which led to the discovery that Deborah Tavares' emails were FORGED in the "FORGED PG&E Email Hoax" which is explained on page one of this thread. And, PATTERNS OF CONDUCT NEVER LIE!

Deborah Tavares and her partners used this FORGED, MISTAKE-RIDDLED diagram as the “COVER” page for the FAKE government document which they manufactured in support of this hoax. Then, they attached dozens of other documents to their FORGED COVER page. These documents attached included, among other things, a series of spread sheets indicating how much money certain federal courts HAD ON DEPOSIT at the U.S. Treasury on a particular date (often millions of dollars). FOR PROOF, SCROLL DOWN HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf. But, Deborah Tavares fraudulently told her video audience that all of the money appearing on the spread sheets WAS FORWARDED TO THE "FEDERAL RESERVE" to keep. But, this claim was not so. All of the principle amounts of money reflected on those spread sheets WAS RETURNED ONLY TO THE WINNING LITIGANTS THEMSELVES AT THE END OF THEIR CASE.).

Further, Deborah Tavares and her partners ALSO failed to check the lower right hand corner of the diagram that they used for the “COVER” of their FAKE government document. The page number in the lower right hand corner of that COVER page of their FAKE government document is marked page "2". But, the very next page in their FAKE document is numbered page "1" and all of the following pages are sequentially numbered (in at least one version of this FORGERY). This means that the COVER page that Deborah Tavares and her partners used on their FAKE government document is not only RIDDLED WITH STUPID MISTAKES (described above), it also CAME FROM AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DOCUMENT than the pages attached to it. This means that Deborah Tavares and her partners ASSEMBLED THEIR FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT FROM PARTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS (an inconsistency and a stupid mistake that a REAL government document would not contain). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Finally, in at least one version of this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares and her partners went through EVERY SINGLE PAGE of their entire FAKE government document and fraudulently REPLACED the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) with the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) to make the interior of their FAKE government document "MATCH" the exterior COVER of their FAKE government document (to the effect that all money collected by courts is forwarded to the Federal Reserve). In other versions of this same FAKE government document, almost all reference to the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) and the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY ERASED from the pages attached to the FORGED COVER page of their FAKE government document.

Suffice it to say, this FAKE government document is a FORGERY and was assembled from parts of other documents with conflicting page numbers, neither of which would be the case with a REAL government document.

PROOF:
THE COVER OF DEBORAH TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT:
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE). Note that this VERY SAME fake government diagram which Deborah Tavares and her partners attribute to Rodney "DALE" Class above appears INSIDE “The Great American Adventure: Secrets of America” which Deborah Tavares attributes to "Judge DALE" and which Deborah Tavares posted on her own website in 2012. See page actually numbered "5" here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Remember, since early 2011, Deborah Tavares and her partners have been publicly attributing the "discovery" of the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY to Rod Class (not to "Judge DALE"). THIS PROVES THAT DEBORAH TAVARES IS AFFILIATED WITH AND PUBLISHES THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON HER OWN WEBSITE, WITHIN THE SAME DOCUMENT.

WHAT THE U.S. TREASURY BUILDING ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22U...w=1093&bih=518
COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

WHAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BUILDING ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22F...g+Washington+D. C.%22&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_5P7I3-fZAhWS0FMKHV7-DxoQ_AUIDCgD&biw=1366&bih=651. COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Note here that the COVER of Deborah Tavares FAKE government document unmistakably depicts the "UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING" (shown directly above), but Deborah Tavares fraudulently re-labeled it the "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK" (to make it fit her hoax). Note also the PAGE NUMBER "2" in the lower right corner of the COVER page of Deborah Tavares’ FAKE government document. Finally, note that the following page is NUMBERED PAGE ONE "1" and that all subsequent pages are sequentially numbered (proving that this mistake-riddled COVER page came from an entirely different document than the rest this FAKE government document came from and that it was assembled from parts of other documents.). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

NOTE: Because Deborah Tavares found out that I was going to expose this particular hoax, she panicked and took down her epic YouTube video wherein she spent hours engaged in this hoax and wherein she pretended to be "shocked" and "horrified" by her FAKE government document (which she herself actually created). It was absolutely priceless! It was TRULY OSCAR WORTHY!

CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM DOES NOT FORWARD MONEY COLLECTED BY THE COURTS TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO KEEP. To the contrary, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM MERELY EARNS "INTEREST" (ONLY) ON THE MONEY THAT IS TEMPORARILY DEPOSITED INTO THE COURT REGISTRY UNTIL THE CASE IS OVER, AT WHICH TIME ALL OF THAT MONEY IS AWARDED TO THE WINNING SIDE IN THE CASE.


“The Great American Adventure”
http://howtoexitthematrix.com/wp-con...format_pdf.pdf

“The Legal Process”
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....ook-format.pdf

“The Matrix and the US Constitution”
http://stopthecrime.net/the-matrix-a...-bk-format.pdf

That should be a good beginning.

Incidentally, at the following link,

https://www.shiftfrequency.com/judge...merica-part-1/

we are informed:



THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN by: Judge Dale, retired

Our federal government has instructed our federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a SOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a TERRORIST! They have also brainwashed the American public into believing that being a SOVEREIGN is anti-American and unpatriotic! Perhaps this is: “The POT calling the KETTLE black?”

WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherent right and prerogative of a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule. Ironically, the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with those people who claim to be SOVEREIGN citizens of the American Republic!


Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Government. The court went on to define that local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions.
Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 – 2000 – ‎Supreme Court – Cited by 761 litigants in other cases.
Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 – 2011 – ‎Supreme Court – Cited by 306 “ “
Bond v. US, 1 F. 3d 631 – 1993 – ‎Court of Appeals, 7th – Cited by 66 “ “
What are the implications of this 2000, U. S. Supreme Court ruling?

1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of corporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. [See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P. 722] and [Pull up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words “District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.]

2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government.

3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security.

4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!

6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?
[Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!]

7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!

8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]

9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!

10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!

11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.
Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic.
Blessings, Judge Dale, retired


FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #58.
Last edited by snoop4truth; 05-26-2020 at 07:07 PM.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE ALL GOVERNMENTS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE "PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS" HOAX:

THE HOAX: In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") fraudulently claim that ALL governments and government agencies are actually PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS "posing" as governments and government agencies which "profit" by taxing, burdening and abusing the American people. To support this fraudulent claim, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney cite examples of several ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS which happen to have names that SOUND SIMILAR to the names of governments or government agencies (like "Federal Express" for example). But, contrary to their claims, NONE of the ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS which they cite in support of this hoax are really governments or government agencies. Not one! This hoax was designed to make Americans think that all governments and agencies are completely illegal, invalid, illegitimate, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

They also fraudulently "SWITCHED" THE REAL NAME of one such ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION TO A FAKE NAME to make it fit the hoax (from "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", a private, for-profit corporation, to "Internal Revenue Service", a government agency). See proof below.

PROOF:
THE "UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY" HOAX: In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney fraudulently claim that the ordinary, private, for-profit corporation named the "United States Corporation Company" IS THE GOVERNMENT OF THE "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". FOR PROOF, go to 2:00-3:10 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk. But, this claim is not so.

The "United States Corporation Company" is actually an ordinary, private, for-profit corporation that acts as a "REGISTERED AGENT" which accepts "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on behalf of OTHER CORPORATIONS doing business in Florida. And, the "United States Corporation Company" is ACTUALLY LISTED AS SUCH by the Florida Secretary of State, Division of Corporations. http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...0Company/Page1 (BE SURE TO SCROLL THROUGH ALL OF THE PAGES IN THIS LINK.). The "United States Corporation Company" is not really the government of the United States Of America.

SO, WHAT IS A "REGISTERED AGENT"?
In Florida (and in most states), every corporation doing business in the state is required to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf. https://law.justia.com/codes/florida...tion607.0501/; http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...0607.0501.html. This permits a person or entity damaged by such a corporation to "serve" that corporation with a civil lawsuit inside the state. The "United States Corporation Company" is merely an ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT COMPANY that, for a fee, provides that service to other corporations (which are often out-of-state corporations which do not have an office or employees inside the state to accept "service of process" on their behalf). That means the "United States Corporation Company" merely helps OTHER CORPORATIONS comply with Florida law which requires every corporation doing business in the state to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf.
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...ATES%201000090.
(Scroll all the way down to the very bottom of this link and click on the FINAL document. Tavares refers to this document later in her FIRST video below.)


THE "INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE, INC." HOAX:
In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney fraudulently claim that the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." IS A GOVERNMENT AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA KNOWN AS THE "THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE". But, this claim is not so. The "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." is actually an ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION which offers auditing and accounting services to customers for a fee. Nothing more. The "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." is not really the "Internal Revenue Service" of the United States of America.

But, to pull this particular hoax off, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney FRAUDULENTLY "SWITCHED" THE NAME "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." (THE REAL NAME) to the "Internal Revenue Service" (THE FAKE NAME) to make it fit the hoax. FOR PROOF, go to 4:30-4:45 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk.

This "SWITCH" is precisely the reason that Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney REFUSE TO SHOW AN ACTUAL PHOTO of this particular corporation's "corporate charter" in their video as they do with other "corporate charters" of the other corporations they feature in their video (BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THE CORPORATION'S "REAL NAME" WHICH WOULD EXPOSE THEIR INTENTIONAL FRAUD OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE). See the truth about this particular fraud here. https://www.dropbox.com/s/04tmhmd08w...it%20Service%2 0Inc..pdf?dl=0 (Note here that this ordinary, private, for-profit corporation, the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", WAS INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE.); http://www.hovindology.com/?p=80 (THIS LINK IS EXCELLENT. READ IT ALL.)

VIDEOS BY DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY IN WHICH THEY FRAUDULENTLY CLAIM THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS AND AGENCIES ARE PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS":

YOU MUST SEE THIS VIDEO!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (See the WHOLE VIDEO, but be especially certain to listen at 2:00-3:10 (for the "United States Corporation Company Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:30-4:45 (for the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc. Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:45-4:55, 5:55-6:10, 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 9:05-9:45, 22:00-22:50, 24:10-24:25, 25:55-26:45.).

RELATED VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES AND/OR AL WHITNEY ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45).

CONCLUSION: No true government or true government agency is actually a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #63.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE “BOMBSHELL: ROD CLASS HAS OBTAINED HIS FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING THAT ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE ‘PRIVATE ENTITIES’ OR ‘PRIVATE CONTRACTORS’ HOAX”

VIDEO OF ROD CLASS (DEBORAH TAVARES' PARTNER) ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk LISTEN FOR THE FOLLOWING FRAUDULENT CLAIMS IN THIS VIDEO. (NOTE CLASS' FRAUDULENT USE OF PLURAL TERMS, SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO THIS HOAX.). "When THEY came in and THEY declared THEIRSELVES (sic) to be PRIVATE entitIES out of the administrative court [an event that NEVER occurred], and the attorney general’s office had put in (sic) that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [an event that NEVER occurred], and the city law director [said] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [an event that NEVER occurred], that means that these POLICE OFFICERS out here in the road ARE PRIVATE contractorS [something that is not so]. THEY are NOT classified as PUBLIC officialS when THEY drag you into THEIR standard court in your community. Because the judge will sit here [and say] this is an upstanding public office. THESE are public officialS. Well, the administrative court says, "no THEY are not." THEY are a private contractor (sic). Now, we got a conflict." (at 7:10-8:00) "The court has classified THEM as PRIVATE contractorS. THEY are NOT PART OF THE STATE. This opens up a big law suit across this country." (at 8:20-8:35) "So, you have an administrative court coming in and defining THESE PEOPLE as PRIVATE contractorS, NON-PUBLIC officialS [an event that NEVER occurred]. Now, when THEY are classifying the Department Of Transportation as a NON-PUBLIC OFFICE [an event that NEVER occurred] the tag agency as a NON-PUBLIC OFFICE, then that means THEY are running EVERY SINGLE AGENCY through that state AS A PRIVATE CONTRACT SET UP, NON-PUBLIC officialS. Some of you are not aware, back in 2006 that there was a class action lawsuit against the court system [which Class LOST and which was THROWN OUT of district court and THROWN OUT of the court of appeals]. The 10th Circuit [Court of Appeals] ruled [when THROWING the case OUT of court] that ALL OF THESE public officialS were CORPORATE APPELLEES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. THEY belong to the CORPORATION. THEY were NOT PUBLIC officialS. Therefore, the court cannot hold THEM to [a] violation of THEIR oath of office because THEY are NOT PUBLIC OFFICIALS... . THEY are sitting here saying, ‘THESE are NOT PUBLIC officerS. THEY are NOT PUBLIC officialS. But, THEY hold positionS as PRIVATE contractorS and therefore the administrative court has no subject matter jurisdiction over private PEOPLE.' They would only have it over PUBLIC OFFICIALS." (at 9:00-10:50) "Right now, I'm sitting on three documents. I'm sitting on the 10th Circuit [dismissal THROWING the case OUT of court] that admitted that these PEOPLE are CORPORATE APPELLEES [an admission that NEVER occurred]. We're sitting on the paperwork from this administrative court from this law judge sitting here saying that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS or PRIVATE entitIES [something the law judge did not say]. We're sitting on the paperwork from the attorney general’s office and the city law director sitting here saying THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something the paperwork does not say]. THEY are NON-PUBLIC officialS. ... . I’ve got another case where another administrative law judge has come back in and again has stated that THE POLICE DEPARTMENT- that these PEOPLE are NOT PUBLIC officialS. They are PRIVATE contractorS. THEY don’t work for the state." (at 25:00-25:35) "I got three hearings where it is confirmed [that] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS. We got three hearings. We’ve got an administrative judge saying THEY are PRIVATE entitIES. NON-PUBLIC officialS. (at 36:40-37:00) "The fact that THEY are admitting that police officers are PRIVATE contractorS [something NEVER admitted to]... . THEY are classified as PRIVATE contractorS." (at 43:00-43:25) "Your honor. It is a proven fact that that police officer is NOT A PUBLIC OFFICIAL. It is a proven fact his is a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR. And, he cannot use the state to come into this court room and, he has NO AUTHORITY. As a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR, he only has jurisdiction over those that hire him and I did not hire this man. He has NO AUTHORITY over me." (at 50:35-51:05) "We got the 10th Circuit ruling [THROWING the case OUT of court which said] that THEY are CORPORATE APPELLEES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. We got the administrative hearing out of North Carolina that THEY are PRIVATE entitIES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. We got the paperwork form the attorney general’s office [that] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something paperwork does not say]. We got the paperwork from the city law director that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something paperwork does not say]." (at 53:05-53-20)

FAKE PRESS RELEASES (CO-AUTHORED BY DEBORAH TAVARES):
LOOK FOR THE SIGNATURE TERM, "BOMBSHELL"
http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/...p?q=1350315108;
https://sherayx.wordpress.com/2013/0...-contractors/;
http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U...ractors.shtml;
https://www.scribd.com/document/1828...blic-Notice-P;
https://bbsradio.com/cgi-bin/webbbs/...=read;id=27745;
http://gold-silver.us/forum/archive/...p/t-64278.html;
https://peoplestrustmilwaukee.wordpr...013/02/03/364/ (at the 4th full paragraph);
https://scannedretina.com/2012/10/15...es-are-vacant/.

RELATED FAKE PRESS RELEASES:
https://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com...vate-entities/
https://ppjg.me/2014/08/08/north-car...vate-entities/
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...tractors/23602.
http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/WE-ARE-C...ages/43090012/;
https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/StLouis...ages/25275652/;
https://newearth.media/private-attor...s-on-the-itnj/ (at the 1st full sentence).
http://nesaranews.blogspot.ca/search...-paginate=true (scroll down to 2nd article at about 15% through the text of the page);
https://keystoliberty.wordpress.com/...em-fraudulent/ (at the 5th full paragraph);


SIDE NOTE:
NOTE THAT THE VERY FIRST WORD IN THE TITLE OF THIS HOAX IS THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "BOMBSHELL" (SEE LINKS DIRECTLY ABOVE). THIS IS SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE DEBORAH TAVARES, JUDGE "DALE", RODNEY "DALE" CLASS AND Al WHITNEY (REAL NAME "ANITA LARIN") ALL JUST HAPPEN TO ALL USE THE SAME, SHARED, COMMON, UNIQUE, "SIGNATURE" TERMS IN THE WORDING OF THEIR HOAXES, AN AMAZING COINCIDENCE. IN THIS PARTICULAR HOAX, THEY USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "BOMBSHELL". IN OTHER HOAXES, THEY USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "MATRIX" (see comment 58 above).

BELOW ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF OTHER "BOMBSHELL" HOAXES BY DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS' CHIEF PARTNER IN THIS HOAX:
http://www.leclife.com/index.php?ale...rah%20Tavares;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIIw5xhG5Ho;
https://hah.life/video/yLIIw5xhG5Ho/...rah%20Tavares;
https://hmongdisk.com/find?search_qu...orah%20tavares
http://legacy.staged.com/video?v=ROIh;
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...-2978738.html;
https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alterna...4/2978738.html;
https://www.reddit.com/r/Coincidence...extinction_of/
https://mclip.tv/video/LIIw5xhG5Ho/b...eborah-tavares;
http://www.mp3xd-com.com/bajar-mp3/b...borah-Tavares;
http://mp3yts.com/mp3/red-pill-repor...h-tavares.html (Scroll down to the 30th video at about 60-65% down the page.);
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/535435843171121259/;
http://meetnigerians.net/members/vid...hoTszlL_G6tQ6Q.

BOMBSHELL HOAXES BY AL WHITNEY (REAL NAME ANITA LARIN):
https://www.google.com/search?source...10.D1HZCM7JM-c (Look for "Italian court judge drops Bombshell" in blue text.);
http://www.stopthecrime.net/mind.html (Scroll down to about 99% through the text to "Italian court judge drops Bombshell" in blue text.).


SIDE NOTE:
Note that this hoax was created in support of the "All Governments And Governmental Agencies Are Private, For-Profit Corporations Hoax", a hoax by Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney exposed in Post # 63 above. .

THE HOAX:
BOMBSHELL: Rod Class has obtained his “FOUR” “administrative ruling” that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractors”. But, this claim in not so.

THE TRUTH:
Rod Class NEVER obtained even one single ruling to that effect, much less “FOUR” of them.

HOAX SIMPLIFIED:
This HOAX arose out of TWO cases that Class LOST (and the LOSS of the appeals of BOTH of those two LOSSES). In BOTH of these two cases, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. Like all of the cases that Class files, he LOST these two cases too. In their DISMISSALS of these two cases (throwing them out of court), the judges in BOTH OF THESE TWO CASES referred to the private corporations that Class had sued and to the government agencies that Class had sued SEPARATELY (one ruling DISMISSING the government agencies that Class had sued and a different ruling DISMISSING the private corporations that Class had sued). But, in trying to explain away these two LOSSES to his followers, Class fraudulently “SWITCHED” the judges’ words about the private corporations that Class had sued with the judges’ words about the government agencies that Class had sued. By “SWITCHING” the judges’ words about the private corporations with the judges’ words about the government agencies, Class fraudulently created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually talking about the private corporations, they were instead talking about all of the government agencies. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judges words (from ONE GROUP of defendants TO THE OTHER group of defendants) created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually referring to THE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as a SINGLE “private entitY” as applicable, they were instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class had sued as “corporate appelleeS” or as “private entitIES”, as applicable. But, that was not so.

THE TRUTH IN THE FIRST CASE (The 10th Circuit LOSS):
In this case, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. In his DISMISSAL of the first case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the term, “Corporate Appellees”, when referring BY NAME (ONLY) to a private bank and to two private insurance companies that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL of this case (throwing it out of court), the judge was instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" that Class had sued as “corporate appellees”. In the link below, scroll down to the BOLD, BLACK TYPE in the YELLOW-HIGHLIGHTED PARAGRAPH at about 35-40% through the text of this page. LOOK FOR THE TERM, "10th Circuit" IN BOLD TYPE. http://www.rayservers.com/blog/rod-c...ar-association (Remember, the BOLD, BLACK TYPE in the YELLOW-HIGHLIGHTED PARAGRAPH at about 35-40% through the text of this page and look for the term, "10th Circuit" IN BOLD TYPE). In the video below, listen to 9:35-10:50, 25:05-25:35, 43:00-44:10, 53:00-53:20. LISTEN FOR THE TERM, "10th Circuit". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, 9:35-10:50, 25:05-25:35, 43:40-44:10, 53:00-53:20 and listen for the term, "10th Circuit"). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s words (from ONE TYPE of defendant TO THE OTHER TYPE of defendant) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" were “corporate appellees”. Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this 10th Circuit DISMISSAL (throwing the case out of court) can be found here. In the link below, scroll down to page 6 at lines 13-15. Look for the following phrase, "Appellees Westfield Insurance Company, CNA Surety, and First National Bank ("Corporate Appellees") have filed a separate motion... ." https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOUR...07-05026-0.pdf (Remember, page 6 at lines 13-15 and identify which defendants the court REALLY refers to as "corporate appellees"). After reading what the judge in this case actually said, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class sued as “corporate appellees” OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer BY NAME (ONLY) to the private bank and the two private insurance companies that Class used as “corporate appellees"?

THE TRUTH IN THE SECOND CASE (The North Carolina Administrative Court LOSS):
In this case, Class sued a STATE-WIDE government "agency", a “LOCAL unit of government” and a SINGLE “private entitY”, ALL IN THE SAME CASE. Specifically, Class filed an administrative suit against the North Carolina Department of Transportation (a STATE-WIDE government "agency" which was immune from suit by statute), against a “LOCAL” city police department (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a "LOCAL" “UNIT OF GOVERNMENT", rather than a STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor) and against a SINGLE private contractor that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a SINGLE “private entitY”). In his DISMISSAL of this second case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the SINGULAR term, “private entitY” when referring BY NAME (ONLY) to that SINGLE “private entitY” that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL of the case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the PLURAL term, “private entitIES” and fraudulently told his followers that the judge was instead referring to ALL THREE DEFENDANTS that Class had sued as “private entitIES” (including the LOCAL city police department). In the link below, read the 2nd, 3rd and FINAL paragraphs. LOOK FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERM, "entitIES" in that text. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf (Remember, the 2nd, 3rd and FINAL paragraphs and LOOK FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERM, "entitIES" in that text). In the video below, listen to 9:00-9:15, 25:15-25:35, 53:05-53:20. LISTEN FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERMS, "entitIES" and "contractorS" in the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, 9:00-9:15, 25:15-25:35, 53:05-53:20 and LISTEN FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERMS, "entitIES" and "contractorS" in the video.). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s actual word, “entitY” (a SINGULAR term) to the FRAUDULENT word, “entitIES” (a PLURAL term) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled "ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES" (including the LOCAL city police department) were “private entitIES” (a PLURAL term that does not appear anywhere in the DISMISSAL). Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this North Carolina Administrative Court DISMISSAL (throwing the case out of court) can be found here. In the link below, scroll down to the document entitled “Conclusions Of Law” to the text actually numbered paragraph "4" and read the SECOND sentence of that 4th paragraph. Look for the following phrase, "[The] Respondent License Plate Agency [ONLY]... is a private entitY [A SINGULAR TERM]... [and not an agency of] state government." https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...y_complete.pdf (Remember, "Conclusions Of Law" in the text actually numbered paragraph "4" in the SECOND sentence of that 4th paragraph and look for the SINGULAR term, "entitY"). After reading what the judge in this case actually said in this case, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL THREE DEFENDANTS” (including the LOCAL city police department) as “private entitIES”, a PLURAL term OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer BY NAME (ONLY) to the SINGLE private contractor that sold license plates for the State of North Carolina as a SINGLE “private entitY”, a SINGULAR term?

In fairness to Class, who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate, CLASS MISTAKENLY BELIEVED THAT HE HAD SUED THREE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES in this case. That is why he sued all three defendants in state administrative court. (He mistakenly believed that all three defendants were state-wide government "agencies" under the governor over which state administrative courts usually have jurisdiction.). But, in fact in this case, Class had actually sued ONLY TWO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (OR “UNITS”) and a SINGLE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina. Class mistakenly believed that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he had mistakenly sued in this case was a government agency because he did not know that FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA HAS USED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS TO SELL VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES TO NORTH CAROLINA VEHICLE OWNERS.

If Class had bothered to do a little research before filing suit, he would have discovered that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) was a not a governmental agency at all. Unknown to Class, almost all of the vehicle license plate agencies in the State Of North Carolina (outside the Charlotte & Raleigh areas) are now owned and operated by private contractors of the type that he mistakenly sued in this case (in the mistaken belief that it was a government "agency"). But, despite that the State of North Carolina uses private contractors to sell its vehicle license plates, IT DOES NOT USE PRIVATE CONTRACTORS FOR ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY-TYPE FUNCTION. It only uses private contractors to sell vehicle license plates (includes titling services). This has been PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE to everyone except Rod Class for over half a century.

WHAT CLASS DID NOT KNOW THEN (AND DOES NOT KNOW NOW):

http://www.ncleg.net/ped/reports/doc...ags_report.pdf (Scroll down to "BACKGROUND" on the 4th page, marked "page 2").

http://www.wral.com/dmv-defends-syst...ices/11753455/

http://myfox8.com/2015/01/15/dmv-see...stokes-county/

http://www.journalnow.com/news/local...a4bcf6878.html

https://nanopdf.com/download/isaacs-...lpa-office_pdf (Click on window and scroll down.).

CLASS MAKES MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES:
So, not knowing any better, when the judge in this case DISMISSED (threw out) Class' lawsuit against this SINGLE private contractor on the grounds that it was a SINGLE "private entitY" (and not a STATE-WIDE government "agency" over which the administrative court usually has jurisdiction), Class mistakenly believed he had "forced" the courts to "admit" that a SINGLE "private entitY" was a SINGLE "private entitY" (something that everybody except Class has known for over half a century). This means that Class' own IGNORANCE (of the fact that North Carolina has used private contractors to sell vehicle license plates for more than half a century) led to him reach the mistaken conclusion that he had miraculously become a "legal genius". To this very day, Class does not know that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) had actually been a SINGLE "private entitY" all along. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

CLOSING NOTE:
Remember, Class falsely claims to have obtained “FOUR” ADMINISTRATIVE rulings to the effect “all government agencies” (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractorS”. Here is how Class reaches the IMAGINARY total of "FOUR" such IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE rulings to that effect. According to Class, his two DISMISSALS (his two LOSSES) described above (throwing his two cases out of court) constituted TWO such IMAGINARY rulings to that effect (one of which was NOT an “ADMINISTRATIVE” ruling in the first place, the 10th Circuit DISMISSAL). According to Class, the ruling AGAINST HIM in his LOSS of his APPEAL of his DISMISSAL (LOSS) of the second case (described above) constituted the THIRD such IMAGINARY ruling to that effect (which was likewise NOT an ADMINISTRATIVE ruling either, it was a JUDICIAL ruling as well). (Class' LOSS of his APPEAL of his LOSS of the second case (above) is referred to in the 3rd paragraph in this link. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf (Remember, the 3rd paragraph here.)). Finally, according to Class, an ordinary “MOTION To Dismiss” filed by the state Attorney General’s Office in this second case (above) constituted the “FOURTH” such IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE ruling to that effect (which was NOT A RULING OF ANY KIND, ADMINISTRATIVE or JUDICIAL). (In this "MOTION to Dismiss", the Assistant Attorney General, among other things, simply reminded the judge that Class has MISTAKENLY sued a private contractor that sold license plates for North Carolina in administrative court because he MISTAKENLY believed it was a government agency. The judge agreed and DISMISSED (threw out) Class' case and that court's DISMISSAL of the case was upheld on appeal.). In the video below, listen at 53:00-53:20 for Class' "LIST" of these IMAGINARY rulings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, at 53:00-53:20). (Note that contrary to Class' claims in this video, the city law director never claimed that the city police department was a "private contractor". Instead, the city law director actually said that the LOCAL city police department was not STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor and, therefore, the administrative court had no jurisdiction over it.). This means that of these "FOUR" IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE rulings (allegedly to the effect that all government agencies are "private entitIES"), CLASS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE and only ONE such LOSS (a DISMISSAL) was an "ADMINISTRATIVE" DISMISSAL (or "ruling") in the first place. This "FUZZY MATH" is how Class reaches the FRAUDULENT total of “FOUR” IMAGINARY "ADMINISTRATIVE rulings" to the effect that “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractorS”.

CONCLUSION:
No true government or true government agency is a private, for profit corporation.

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #101.
Last edited by snoop4truth; 09-27-2019 at 12:36 PM.

[snoop4truth]

ROD CLASS, DEBORAH TAVARES & THE “A NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE HAS WARNED POLICE OFFICERS TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES HOAX”

FAKE PRESS RELEASES PEDDLING THE HOAX:
http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com/2...iable-for.html (at the 1st full paragraph);
https://hiddensecretsandlies.blogspo...police-to.html
http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf
https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/StLouis...ages/25275652/ (at the 2nd full paragraph);
http://2013rainbowroundtable.ning.co...=06v6zf7ohrnts;
http://landrightsnfarming-landrightn...7_archive.html;
http://www.city-data.com/forum/north...-patrol-2.html (at comment 8 at about 65% through the text of the page);
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/f...age1684911/pg1 (click and enter the website if necessary);
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...170&viewfull=1 (at 1st several comments)
http://www.thetreeofliberty.com/vb/s...n-this-be-true (at the 1st full comment);
https://newearth.media/press-release...-dc-courtroom/ (beginning at the 10th full paragraph);

THE HOAX:
This hoax is unique in that Rod Class & Deborah Tavares created it to support another hoax, the “BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax” (the hoax DIRECTLY ABOVE). In this particular hoax, Class falsely claims that, IN DIRECT RESPONSE to his having obtained "FOUR" “Administrative Rulings” to the effect that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” are “private entitIES" (imaginary rulings which Class NEVER obtained), a North Carolina judge “WARNED” ALL NORTH CAROLINA "POLICE OFFICERS" TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES (to protect their personal property from the consequences of lawsuits that the public would file against them now that they are no longer be protected by governmental immunity as private contractors). See proof here. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf. But, these claims are not so.

NOTE:
First of all, if Rod Class And Deborah Tavares had known ANYTHING at all about North Carolina law at the time, then they would have NEVER created the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax” in the first place, because doing so only demonstrates the extent of their own IGNORANCE of North Carolina law (explained below).

THE TRUTH:
1. No such “warning” was ever issued BECAUSE CLASS NEVER OBTAINED THE IMAGINARY UNDERLYING RULINGS THAT WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE NECESSITATED SUCH A “WARNING” IN THE FIRST PLACE. (See the "BOMBSHELL: Fourth Administrative Ruling Hoax" DIRCETLY ABOVE.). This is why Class has never published a copy of this particular imaginary "warning" online (something that he would have certainly done if this imaginary warning had actually been real).

2. FOR OVER A CENTURY, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL (AND A LEGALLY INEFFECTIVE) ACT IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR DEBTORS (like police officers facing future lawsuits) TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING THEIR CREDITORS (like future lawsuit judgment creditors). Here's how the law actually works.

In this case, the defendant lost a breach of contract lawsuit and owed the plaintiff $200,000. But, the defendant had no money, so the plaintiff could not collect it at the time. A year later, the defendant became the owner of valuable parcel of real property and, fearing the plaintiff would try to collect the debt by selling his real property, the defendant immediately PURPORTED (means "pretended") TO PUT THE REAL PROPERTY INTO THE NAME OF A TRUST (or, what Rod Class calls putting property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES"). No money changed hands. But, the plaintiff moved to have the real property sold anyway and moved to have the sale proceeds applied to what the defendant owed him anyway. The court agreed and did exactly that! http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "THE TRIAL COURT DETERMINED THAT THE [defendant's] CONVEYANCE [of the real property] TO THE TRUST WAS NOT VALID [not effective] IN THAT IT FAILED TO [legally] CONVEY TITLE [of the real property] TO THE TRUSTEE [of the trust]. THE TRIAL COURT ALSO CONCLUDED THAT EVEN IF THE CONVEYANCE WAS VALID, IT WOULD CONSTITUTE A FRAUDULENT TRANSFER [under the subject statute and under a century of case law] AND [that] IT [the transfer] COULD BE AVOIDED [means "legally undone" if it was ever done in the first place]." (The preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph of the case.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

THIS HAS BEEN THE LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "Aman v. Wlker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 [a 1914 case from the Supreme Court of North Carolina] is a 'landmark case' on FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES. It is therein stated: "... If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY and the grantor [the person pretending to put the property into other peoples' names] did not retain [means "keep"] [other] property fully sufficient and available TO PAY HIS DEBTS [like future lawsuit money judgments]... , it [the conveyance] IS INVALID [means "VOID", "INEFFECTIVE" and "DID NOT WORK"] [to defeat the claims of]... CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors];... ." (The preceding text is in the 2nd full paragraph of the case and includes the block indented, quoted section.); "A CONVEYANCE [a pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS VOLUNTARY when it is NOT FOR VALUE [means not "SOLD" to the transferee AT FULL PRICE]... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph of the case, not including the block indented, quoted section.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "[Over a century ago] in Aman v. Walker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 (1914), the North Carolina Supreme Court set forth the principles governing fraudulent conveyances as follows: ... ; (2) If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY, and the grantor [the person pretending to put property into other peoples' names] DID NOT RETAIN [means "keep"] [other] PROPERTY [that was] FULLY SUFFICIENT AND AVAILABLE TO PAY HIS DEBTS [like future lawsuit judgments] ... IT [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS INVALID [means "VOID" and "DID NOT WORK" to defeat the claims of]... CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors]. (3) If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY and MADE WITH THE ACTUAL INTENT ON THE PART OF THE GRANTOR [the person pretending to put the property into other peoples' names] TO DEFRAUD CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors], IT [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS VOID [means "INEFFECTIVE", "IT NEVER HAPPENED" and "IT DID NOT WORK" to defeat the claims of future lawsuit judgment creditors]... ." (The preceding test is in the 3rd full paragraph and includes the block indented quoted section.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

3. In addition to having been illegal and ineffective for more than a century under case law (above), such FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS have also been illegal and ineffective FOR TWO DECADES, BY NORTH CAROLINA STATUTE. By statute, any attempt by creditors (like police officers facing future lawsuits) to "put their property into other peoples' names" in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (like future lawsuit judgment creditors) HAS BEEN ILLEGAL AND INEFFECTIVE, which, of course, defeats the purpose of putting property into other peoples' names in the first place (because doing so WOULD NOT protect a debtor’s property from lawsuit judgment creditors ANYWAY). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in an effort to defeat the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

THIS IS THE CURRENT STATUTE ON THE SUBJECT IN NORTH CAROLINA:
https://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Enacted...rticle_3A.html LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS STATUTE: "39-23.4. ... . (a) A TRANSFER [of property into other peoples' names] made ... by a DEBTOR [like a police officer facing a future lawsuit] is VOIDABLE [means can be legally "undone"] as to a CREDITOR [like a future lawsuit judgment creditor], whether the creditor's claim [the facts giving rise to the creditor's lawsuit] arose [occurred] BEFORE or AFTER the TRANSFER was made... , IF THE DEBTOR MADE THE TRANSFER... : (1) With the INTENT to HINDER, DELAY, DEFRAUD and CREDITOR of the DEBTOR; OR (2) Without RECEIVING... [FULL PRICE for the property]. (b) In determining INTENT under subdivision (a)(1) of this section [the immediately preceding section above], ... [the court may consider]... whether: (1) The TRANSFER... was made to an insider [like a friend or relative]; (2) [whether] The DEBTOR retained [means "kept"] POSSESSION or CONTROL of the property TRANSFERRED AFTER THE TRANSFER;... (4) [whether] BEFORE THE TRANSFER WAS MADE... , THE DEBTOR HAD BEEN SUED OR THREATENED WITH SUIT [read this phrase again]; (5) Whether the transfer was of SUBSTANIALLY ALL OF THE DEBTOR'S ASSETS [or only part of the debtor's assets]... ." (The preceding text is at section "39-23-4. (a) and (b) at about 45% through the text of the statute.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

In this case, the defendant was a millionaire whose most valuable asset was a parcel of real property. The defendant owned a company that borrowed money to buy an airplane and the defendant personally guaranteed repayment of the loan. But, neither the defendant or his company repaid the loan. Fearing a lawsuit, the defendant and his wife formed a new company and HE PUT HIS REAL PROPERTY INTO THE NAME OF THAT NEW COMPANY (or, what Rod Class calls putting property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES"). No money changed hands. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "...[In sorting out the case, the court wrote] [O]UR LEGISLATURE [referring to the North Carolina legislature] ENACTED THE UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS ACT, LATER RENAMED THE UNIFORM VOIDABLE TRANSFERS ACT ("UVTA")... NEARLY TWO DECADES GO [note how long ago North Carolina passed this statute]." (The preceding text is in the 1st paragraph below the heading entitled, "B. Interpretation of 'Transfer'", at about 34-40% through the text of the case.).

4. Unknown to Class, FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL ACT in North Carolina (and for decades, a violation of the Judicial Code Of Conduct) FOR A JUDGE TO ILLEGALLY “WARN”, COUNSEL, ADVISE OR RECOMMEND that anyone (including police officers facing future lawsuits) "BREAK THE LAW" by putting their property into other peoples' names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (AN ILLEGAL ACT that would not protect the debtor's property anyway). Any REAL judge who issued such an ILLEGAL "warning" would immediately be removed from office and disbarred. But, Class does not know this.

ANALYSIS:
Thus, in manufacturing the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax”, Class and Tavares were so IGNORANT of North Carolina law that they did not know then and do not know now that ALL OF THE "FACTS" that they allege in this hoax are LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER NORTH CAROLINA LAW, which conclusively establish this lie as the hoax that it is. THIS IS BECAUSE NO REAL NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE WOULD "BREAK THE LAW" --- BY "ILLEGALLY" WARNING POLICE OFFICERS TO "BREAK THE LAW" --- BY DOING SOMETHING "ILLEGAL" (PUTTING THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS)--- IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUITS WHICH WILL "NEVER SUCCEED" (DUE TO IMMUNITY)--- OR FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS WHO WILL "NEVER EXIST" (DUE TO IMMUNITY) --- ESPECIALLY GIVEN THAT ANY SUCH "ILLEGAL " ACT IS "REVERSIBLE" ANYWAY AND THEREFORE WOULD NOT PROTECT THE DEBTOR'S PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS IN THE FIRST PLACE (MAKING SUCH AN EFFORT ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS). But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

5. If more be necessary, North Carolina law already makes the EQUITY IN A HOMESTEAD (a residential property occupied by the owners), VEHICLE AND CERTAIN OTHER PROPERTY “EXEMPT” (“protected”) from the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors up to a certain amount ANYWAY. THUS, IN MOST CASES, THIS EXEMPTION WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR POLICE OFFICERS TO "ILLEGALLY" PRETEND TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES, EVEN IF THAT "ILLEGAL" ACT WOULD PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS (AND IT WOULD NOT). But, Class does not know this. Constitution of the State Of North Carolina Art. 16 § 1C-1601. http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislat...Article_16.pdf

For more information on the “Property In Other Peoples' Names Hoax”, see Class’ internet radio show, “Episode 966" on Talkshoe (spelled correctly) AIB radio, recorded or posted on 12-12-2015. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=2&pageSize=15 or simply Google “Post Oak Public Relations”. https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-wharfield-0b56746. Further, be sure to look into William H. Gilpatric, IV of Middlesex County, Maine (address and contact information withheld). Gilpatric is aware of all the parties involved in the hoax and how it was manufactured and marketed.

ANALYSIS:
Suffice it to say, this is one of Class’ more embarrassingly-amateur hoaxes. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT --- AND CLASS DOES NOT.). Class does not lie to people for whom he has respect. Class only lies to people for whom he has no respect. The PATHOLOGICAL LIES reflected in this particular hoax speak volumes about what Class REALLY thinks of the American people. Class pretends to be a humble public servant who is only revealing the "hidden truth" about the law and the legal system to the down-trodden masses. But, this is not so. Class is actually a calculating and manipulative charlatan with no conscience whatsoever and no moral compass whatsoever. Class' two missions in life are to glorify himself and to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their appointees for doing their jobs. If he has to lie to the American people and commit fraud upon the American people in the process of inciting this hatred, that is perfectly fine with him. Class has no intention of telling you the truth. None.

ANALYSIS:
ROD CLASS (with his inability to read, his lack of education, his ignorance of the law, his delusional belief system, his worthless, amateur legal theories, his lack of honesty and his 100% failure rate in court in 76 consecutive losses) IS "LIVING PROOF" THAT THOSE WHO PRACTICE LAW (AND THOSE WHO TEACH THE LAW) SHOULD:
1). BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE EDUCATION (a "Bachelor's Degree");
2). BE REQUIRED TO ALSO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL THREE TO FOUR YEAR LAW SCHOOL EDUCATION (a "Juris Doctor's Degree");
3). BE REQUIRED TO PASS THE STATE BAR EXAM (takes three days);
4). BE REQUIRED TO UNDERGO A RIGOROUS STATE CHARACTER AND FITNESS BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION WHICH TAKES SEVERAL MONTHS OR YEARS (NO MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY, NO CRIMINAL HISTORY, honesty, credit history, interviews of employers, teachers, former co-workers, neighbors, relatives, taking finger print samples, taking hand writing samples, etc.).
5). BE LICENSED BY THE STATE AND BE SUBJECT TO THE CONTINUOUS OVERSIGHT AND DISCIPLINE OF THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT, THE STATE SUPREME COURT (in order to protect the public from INCOMPETENCE and FRAUD of the type exhibited by Rod Class).

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #104.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE GENOCIDE AGREEMENT HOAX:

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
(Note: The video that best reflected the fraud of Deborah Tavares in this hoax was recently removed from YouTube.com. Below are the best videos which remain.).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh1RW1Bjqag (Whole video, but be especially certain to listen at 1:40-1:51);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgOtJFGAhhQ (Whole video, but be especially certain to listen at 1:40-1:51).


AUDIOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
https://www.groundzeromedia.org/2-8-...-8-2018/albums
https://www.mp3ist.com/dinle-indir/t...bruary-8-2018/

SITES & ARTICLES PEDDLING THE HOAX:
http://cherylkicksass.blogspot.com/2...enting-un.html
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/Genocide%20Treaty.pdf (Note the webmaster.).

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE "GENOCIDE AGREEMENT":
https://www.oas.org/dil/1948_Convent...f_Genocide.pdf (The actual text of the agreement);
https://www.un.org/en/genocidepreven...nvention.shtml;
https://www.un.org/en/genocidepreven...tSheet-ENG.pdf;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_Convention.

PRE-APPROVAL SENATE DEBATES FOR AND AGAINST AGREEING TO THE AGREEMENT:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...70-pt4-1-1.pdf (Scroll down to page '4269" about 30% through the text to "Javitiz Supports U.N. Genocide Convention")
DEFINITIONS: A "treaty" is a nation's agreement with a single other nation. A "convention" is a nation's agreement with multiple other nations.

THE DOCUMENT:
The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. The "Genocide Agreement" is actually the NICKNAME of a proposed 1940's United Nations convention BANNING GENOCIDE among signatory nations. https://9tube.tv/video/64507641476d6946755449. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPvAGmiFuTI. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...102-Pg3045.pdf.

SUMMARY:
The proposed "Genocide Agreement" BANNED "GENOCIDE" of identifiable groups of people, such as national, ethnic, racial or religious groups.

OTHER FORBIDDEN ACTS:
But, the proposed "Genocide Agreement" also banned: 1). causing serious bodily or mental harm to such people, 2). inflicting physically destructive conditions upon such people, 3). preventing births of such people, and 4). displacing the children of such people.

ACTS PUNISHABLE:
The proposed "Genocide Agreement" MADE THE FOLLOWING ACTS PUNISHABLE: 1).committing a forbidden act (above), 2). conspiracy to commit a forbidden act (above), 3). incitement to commit a forbidden act (above), the 4). attempt to commit a forbidden act (above), and 5). complicity in the commission of a forbidden act (above).

JURISDICTION, VENUE & PROCEDURE:
1). Under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", an individual accused of violating the agreement could tried in the state where the alleged offense occurred OR COULD BE TRIED BY AN "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL" under certain specified conditions.

2). Further, under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", nations would be BOUND TO EXTRADITE their own citizens to other nations for prosecution in accordance with existing extradition treaties between those nations.

3). Finally, under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", any dispute arising out of the interpretation, application or fulfillment of the agreement WOULD BE DECIDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE at the request of any party to the dispute.

CONTROVERSY:
At the time (1940's through 1980's), Senators from southern states in particular opposed the "Genocide Treaty" because of its implications with respect to the racial struggle between whites and blacks (certainly a racially identifiable group of people, as defined in the "Genocide Agreement"). They argued that under the "Genocide Agreement" white citizens could theoretically be tried and convicted for merely opposing racial integration in schools and merely supporting racial segregation in schools, for example (arguably the displacement of the children of such people, as specifically prohibited by the Genocide Agreement"). Other Senators opposed the "Genocide Agreement" because of its implications on state and federal sovereignty ("invades domestic law", "allows foreigners to over-ride U.S. law", etc.). (See transcripts of Congressional debates posted above for more on this.). Regardless, in 1988, the United States Senate approved the "Genocide Agreement" and President Reagan signed it into law. https://9tube.tv/video/637935664a446244424567.html. So, the hoax is not the document itself.

THE HOAX I:
Deborah Tavares fraudulently defines the "Genocide Agreement" as an "AGREEMENT TO ALLOW THE PRACTICING OF GENOCIDE ON A DAY BY DAY BASIS". Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that as a direct result of the "Genocide Agreement" the "KILLING OF ENTIRE POPULATIONS IS HAPPENING NOW". Thus Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that the "Genocide Agreement" ACTUALLY SUPPORTS GENOCIDE and ACTUALLY CAUSES GENOCIDE. (SEE THE INTRODUCTION TO THE VIDEOS POSTED ABOVE.). But, none of this is so. The "Genocide Agreement" is an international convention THAT ACTUALLY BANS GENOCIDE AMONG SIGNATORY NATIONS AND SUBJECTS THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO VIOLATE IT TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW . Thus, the "Genocide Agreement" PREVENTS GENOCIDE. IT DOES NOT CAUSE GENOCIDE (the EXACT OPPOSITE to what Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims in her hoax).

THE HOAX II:
Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that the Genocide Agreement ONLY BANS "NATIONS" FROM COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE and that THE UNITED STATES IS "NOT A NATION", BECAUSE "IT IS A CORPORATION" (which is not governed by the agreement or the ban) WHICH PERMITS THE UNITED STATES TO COMMIT GENOCIDE on a "Day-by-Day" basis, which is why "WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED" (exact quotes of her words). But, the truth is that the United States is not really a "corporation" and the "Genocide Agreement" actually BANS GENOCIDE in the United States and subjects those individuals who violate it to criminal prosecution under international law.

THE HOAX III:
The hoax is also Deborah Tavares' OWN (ENTIRELY INCONSISTENT & CONFLICTING) claims that the genocide agreement DOES APPLY IN THE UNITED STATES (despite that it is a "corporation") and that it "INVADES DOMESTIC LAWS" and "ALLOWS FOREIGNERS TO 'OVER-RIDE' U.S. laws". (Note that if the Genocide Agreement really "DID NOT APPLY" to the United States because it is a "CORPORATION", it would be impossible for the Genocide Agreement TO SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLY in the United States so as to "invade" or "over-ride" any law in the United States.). Regardless, the truth is that the Genocide Agreement does apply in the United States, but only "over-rides" U.S. law as to the specific acts banned by the agreement (shown above). Nothing more.

CONCLUSION:
The United States may actually be killing us all in an act or acts of genocide in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind, but THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because this document applies in the United States and actually BANS GENOCIDE and subjects those individuals who violate it to criminal prosecution under international law.

VIDEO:
For the YouTube video in which Virgo Triad exposes this very hoax, CLICK HERE.
https://youtu.be/OMEUxGPz8mA

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #108.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS & THE "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" HOAX

FIRST SEE THE HOAX HERE:
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....udge-dale.html (contains 100% FAKE case law and a series of LIES written by Rodney DALE Class while pretending to "Judge DALE").

THE HOAX:
DEBORAH TAVARES, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly claim that a "SOVEREIGN" is an INDIVIDUAL and that the enemy of a "SOVEREIGN" is "We the People" COLLECTIVELY in the form of our ELECTED GOVERNMENT. But, this is not so.

THE TRUTH:
"We the People" COLLECTIVELY in the form OF THE ELECTED GOVERNMENT of "We the People" IS THE "SOVEREIGN". The INDIVIDUAL IS NOT "SOVEREIGN".

THE ACTUAL REAL LAW ITSELF ON WHETHER INDIVIDUALS ARE "SOVEREIGN"
1). Lozano v. Bank of America Loans, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the plaintiff (an amateur legal theorist) sued a lender and claimed to be "SOVEREIGN". But, the court ruled otherwise and held, "First, SHE [the plaintiff] IS NOT A "SOVEREIGN". A SOVEREIGN IS THE GOVERNMENT, OR THE LEADER OF A GOVERNMENT [a Monarch]. SHE [the plaintiff] IS NIETHER [a government or a leader of a government]." TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

2). U.S. v. Crawford, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court wrote, "Defendant [an amateur legal theorist] asserts in his motion that HE IS A... SOVEREIGN, and as such is ENTITLED TO SOVEREIGN [GOVERNMENTAL] IMMUNITY from prosecution." But, the court ruled otherwise and held, "Defendant... IS NOT A SOVEREIGN [meaning a GOVERNMENT], BUT [IS] AN INDIVIDUAL. As with ANY INDIVIUAL criminal defendant, Crawford [the INDIVIDUAL defendant] is NOT ENTITLED TO SOVEREIGN [GOVERNMENTAL] IMMUNITY despite his claims to the contrary [because he is NOT a GOVERNMENT]... ." TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

3). Cooper v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...2&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT ONLY THE UNTIED STATES AND THE INDIVIDUAL STATES ARE "SOVEREIGN"). In this case, the court held, "It is fundamental that THE UNITED STATES EXISTS AS A SOVEREIGN of delegated powers; DELEGATED TO IT BY THE "SOVEREIGNS" MAKING UP THE UNITED STATES, THE INDIVIDUAL STATES [not individual human beings]." (in the 3rd to last paragraph of this case). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

4). Chisolm v. Georgia, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT ONLY THE STATES AND THE UNITED STATES ARE SOVEREIGN). The court wrote, "EVERY STATE IN THE UNION in every instance where ITS SOVEREIGNTY has NOT been delegated to THE UNITED STATES, [IS]... COMPLETELY SOVEREIGN, AS THE UNITED STATES ARE [SOVEREIGN] IN RESPECT TO THE POWERS SURRENDERED [TO THEM BY THE STATES]. THE UNITED STATES ARE SOVEREIGN AS TO ALL POWERS OF GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY SURRENDERED [TO THEM BY THE STATES]: EACH STATE IN THE UNION IS SOVEREIGN AS TO ALL POWERS RESERVED. " (at the 14th paragraph at about 15% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

SIDE NOTE: Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that the STATES are franchises or subsidiaries of the FEDERAL government. https://scannedretina.com/2014/11/27...erican-people/. But, this is exactly BACKWARDS and OPPOSITE to the truth. The FEDERAL government is a franchise and subsidiary of THE STATES. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case reads, "The powers of the general [FEDERAL] Government ARE MADE UP OF CONCESSIONS [GIFTS] FROM THE STATES." (at the 24th paragraph at about 35% through the text).

5). Parker v. Brown, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT STATES ARE SOVEREIGN). The court wrote, "Under the Constitution, THE STATES ARE SOVEREIGN, SAVE ONLY [means "EXCEPT"] AS CONGRESS MAY CONSTITUTIONALLY [under Article 1, Section 8] SUBTRACT FROM THEIR AUTHORITY [their SOVEREIGNTY]." (at the 16th paragraph at about 30% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

6). Feldman v. Gardner, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (HOLDING THAT THE STATES ARE SOVEREIGN). The court wrote, "Inherent in our system of government is the concept of DUAL [meaning FEDERAL and STATE] SOVEREIGNTY; EACH STATE IS SOVEREIGN, except to the extent that ITS SOVEREIGNTY is curtailed by the [United States] Constitution or validly restricted by Congress [as set forth in Article 1, Section 8]." (at the 1st paragraph in "Section B" at about 25% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

7). Dred Scott v. Sandford (rev'd other grounds) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the Chief Justice of The United States Supreme Court held that the terms "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" refer ONLY to "We the People" COLLECTIVELY in the form of the GOVERNMENT and NOT TO INDIVIDUALS. He wrote, "The words 'people [a PLURAL term] of the United States' and 'citizens' [a PLURAL term] are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe THE POLITICAL BODY [a SINGULAR term] who, according to our republican institutions, FORM THE SOVEREIGN [MEANING FORM THE GOVERNMENT], and who [COLLECTIVELY] hold the power and conduct the Government THROUGH THEIR [A PLURAL TERM] [ELECTED] REPRESENTATIVES [meaning the SOVEREIGNTY of "We the People" is exercised COLLECTIVELY through our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, not INDIVIDUALLY], They [a PLURAL term] are what we familiarly call the "SOVEREIGN PEOPLE [a PLURAL term]," and every [INDIVIDUAL] citizen is ONE of this [SOVEREIGN GROUP OF] PEOPLE [a PLURAL term], and a constituent member of this SOVEREIGNTY [the GOVERNMENT of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY]." (at the 24th paragraph at about 5% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

8). Republic Of Panama v. BCCI Holdings, Inc. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court wrote, "The rules of personal jurisdiction protect an INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHTS, NOT A SOVEREIGN'S RIGHTS [drawing a stark contrast between an INDIVIDUAL and a SOVEREIGN]." (in the 24th paragraph). Translation: An INDIVIDUAL has entirely DIFFERENT RIGHTS when compared to the rights of a SOVEREIGN. So, a SOVEREIGN cannot logically be an INDIVIDUAL.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Note that ALL amateur legal theories (ex: "individuals, rather than governments, are sovereign") are always EXACTLY BACKWARDS AND OPPOSITE to what the REAL law actually is. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! Amateur legal theories ARE NOT REAL. They are FAKE. They are LIES. Amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the EXACT OPPOSITES of one another. Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used by the REAL legal system and the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD. Amateur legal theories have a 100% FAILURE RATE in court BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE. They are NOT INTENDED TO WORK and they DO NOT WORK! They never have. They never will. Their SOLE PURPOSE is to attempt to discredit and delegitimize our REPUBLICAN form of government, the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and intended to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. Nothing more.

FACT: Just in case you do not already know, all FUTURE DECISIONS on the subject of whether individuals rather than governments are "sovereign" WILL FOLLOW THE DECISIONS SHOWN ABOVE (CALLED "PRECEDENT"). So, the law on this same subject will always be the same as reflected in the cases above.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/binding-precedent/.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent.
https://dictionary.thelaw.com/binding-precedent/.

FACT: Thus, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ACTUALLY OPPOSE THE VERY "SOVEREIGN" AND THE VERY "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT THEY CLAIM TO SUPPORT. This means that Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ARE ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of the "SOVEREIGN" and ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of "SOVEREIGNTY", not their supporters. But, they do not know enough to even realize this. This is why many such amateur legal theorists (like Rod Class) find themselves on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST (because they actually oppose the "SOVEREIGN" and because they actually oppose "SOVEREIGNTY").

FACT: This fundamental mistake (the mistaken belief that the INDIVIDUAL is "SOVEREIGN" and that the GOVERNMENT of "We the People" IS NOT "SOVEREIGN") reflects that the terms, "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" are perhaps the single most misused and misunderstood terms in all of amateur legal theory.

ABOUT SOVEREIGNTY
BACKGROUND: Originally in politics, a "SOVEREIGN" was a SINGLE "MONARCH" (King or Queen) GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE who GOVERNED a nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the nation state. Originally, the RIGHT of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN his/her own nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE was that MONARCH's right of "SOVEREIGNTY".

Then and now, a "SOVEREIGN" meant/means a "GOVERNMENT" OF ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state. Then and now, "SOVEREIGNTY," meant/means that GOVERNMENT’S RIGHT TO GOVERN ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE.

THE STATES: But, here in the United States, we rejected the notion of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state. Here in our country, we adopted a republican form of government whereby "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) GOVERNED our own states and all of the INDIVIDUALS in our own state COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTED representatives of our own STATE.

So, here in our country, THE STATE ITSELF, which consists of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) became "SOVEREIGN" (which still means THE GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). This means that in our country THE STATE ITSELF legally stands in the shoes of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear. So, in our country, THE STATE ITSELF GOVERNS the STATE and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state (instead of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear). But, the right, power and authority of THE STATE ITSELF as a "SOVEREIGN" and the right, power and authority of the MONARCH of yesteryear as a "SOVEREIGN" ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. In our country, a "SOVEREIGN" IS STILL A "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE, but a "SOVEREIGN" is no longer a SINGLE MONARCH.

Medvedieff v. Cities Service Oil Co., CLICK HERE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...40006&as_vis=1. This case reads, "The term`citizen,' as understood in our law, is precisely analogous to the term 'subject' in the common law [when MONARCHS ruled supreme], and the change of phrase [from "subject" to "citizen"] has entirely resulted from the change [in the form] of government [from a "MONARCHY" to a "REPUBLICAN" form of government]. The SOVEREIGNTY has been transferred from one man [a "MONARCH"] to the COLLECTIVE BODY OF THE PEOPLE [CALLED THE "STATE"] —and HE WHO BEFORE WAS A 'SUBJECT' OF A KING 'IS NOW A CITIZEN OF THE STATE.'" [CLICK HERE http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictiona...overeign.aspx; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...lish/sovereign]. TRANSLATION: SOVEREIGNTY (THE RIGHT TO RULE) HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM ONE MAN (A "MONARCH") TO THE COLLECTIVE BODY OF THE PEOPLE AS A WHOLE (CALLED THE "STATE") —AND HE WHO BEFORE WAS A "SUBJECT" OF A SOVEREIGN MONARCH IS NOW A CITIZEN OF THE SOVEREIGN "STATE.'"
DEFINITION OF "SOVEREIGN":
http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/Sovereign.aspx
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...lish/sovereign

THE BOTTOM LINE: Thus, In our country, the term, "SOVEREIGN" is a term THAT ONLY APPLIES TO A GOVERNMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY (AS A WHOLE) AND NOT TO A SINGLE "CITIZEN", INDIVIDUAL OR PERSON INDIVIDUALLY. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

Here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE. So, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). As a result, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL does not GOVERN the STATE or any of the INDIVIDUALS in the state.

THE UNITED STATES: The United States ITSELF is also a SOVEREIGN nation state consisting of a union of MEMBER SOVEREIGN STATES. So, here in the United States, THE STATES and the United States are both "SOVEREIGN" GOVERNMENTAL HEADS OF STATE (WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS AS DIFFERENTIATED BY SUBJECT MATTER IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION).

This means that here in the United States, THE STATE AND THE UNITED STATES OCCUPY THE SAME EXACT LEGAL POSITION (AND HAVE THE SAME LEGAL RIGHT, POWER AND AUTHORITY TO GOVERN THE STATE AND ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE STATE) AS DID THE SINGLE MONARCH OF YESTERYEAR, except that the powers of the United States (as distinguished from the individual STATES) are limited to those powers expressly delegated to it BY THE STATES in the United States Constitution (a tiny list of subjects), whereas the powers of the individual STATES (as distinguished from the United States) have no such limitation.

Cooper v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...2&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court held, "It is fundamental that THE UNITED STATES EXISTS AS A SOVEREIGN of delegated powers; delegated to it BY THE "SOVEREIGNS" MAKING UP THE UNITED STATES, THE INDIVIDUAL STATES [not individual human beings]." (in the 3rd TO LAST paragraph of this case).

Here in the United States, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" COLLECTIVELY (NOT INDIVIDUALLY) through our VOTES. ---Thomas Jefferson (see below). Thus, "We (a PLURAL term) the People (also a PLURAL term)" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" (COLLECTIVELY, not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTIONS.

Jenkins v. Williamson-Butler, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. The court quoted Thomas Jefferson and wrote, "IT IS BY THEIR [a PLURAL term] VOTES [also a PLURAL term] THAT THE PEOPLE [also a PLURAL term] EXERCISE THEIR [also a PLURAL term] SOVEREIGNTY [AND NOT BY ANY OTHER MEANS]. ---Thomas Jefferson." (at the 12th paragraph, not including block indented portions, at about 60% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY IN THE FORM OF "THE GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL ACTING OUTSIDE THE GOVERMENT CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

Note that the term "the governed' (below) IS ALSO A PLURAL TERM (not an INDIVIDUAL term).
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/co...f-the-governed

But, as INDIVIDUALS, none of us are “SOVEREIGN” (which still means the GOVERNMENT of a state) and as INDIVIDUALS, none of us can exercise any "SOVEREIGNTY" (which still means the right to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state). In our country, we no longer recognize a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (or “MONARCH”) as “SOVEREIGN”. In our country, no single INDIVIDUAL is the GOVERNMENT OF A STATE. This is why, in our country, no INDIVIDUAL can be "SOVEREIGN" (WHICH STILL MEANS A GOVERNMENT OF A STATE).

Lozano v. Bank of America Loans, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. The court held, "First, she [the plaintiff] IS NOT A "SOVEREIGN". A SOVEREIGN IS THE GOVERNMENT, OR THE LEADER OF A GOVERNMENT [such as the Queen Of England]. She [the plaintiff] is neither [a government or a leader of a government]." TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

APPLICATION: This is why every amateur legal theorist who claims to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT) ALWAYS LOSES on that issue with ALL law enforcement officers and with ALL courts. This is why ALL law enforcement officers and ALL courts ALWAYS treat such amateur legal theorists as the mere INDIVIDUALS that they really are. Amateur legal theorists who claim to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT) to law enforcement officers and in court do nothing but demonstrate their IGNORANCE of the law and their IGNORANCE of history--- AND THEY ALWAYS LOSE!

WHAT YOU CAN DO: If you do not like the laws, the ELECTED legislators, the ELECTED executive officers or the ELECTED judges or the ELECTED prosecutors, then do something about it. VOTE OR RUN FOR OFFICE. Pretending to be an INDIVIDUAL, GOVERNMENT OF A STATE (a “SOVEREIGN” MONARCH) has never, and will never work for you as a “defense” to the application of any law, the jurisdiction of any law enforcement officer or court or to the consequences any arrest, charge or conviction.

CONCLUSION: IN OUR COUNTRY, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" (OR OTHERWISE "SOVEREIGN"). HERE, AND ELSEWHERE, ONLY A GOVERNMENT CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN".

THE ACTUAL REAL LAW ON WHETHER AN "INDIVIDUAL" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN" AND THEREFORE BE "IMMUNE" FROM PROSECUTION FOR VIOLATING STATUTES WRITTEN BY LAWMAKERS ELECTED BY "WE THE PEOPLE":

1. U.S. v. Benabe,https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, several defendants (all of whom were amateur legal theorists) falsely claimed to be "SOVEREIGN" and therefore claimed that they were not subject to the court's jurisdiction. But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "We [the courts] have REPEATEDLY REJECTED their theories of INDIVIDUAL [rather than collective] SOVEREIGNTY, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk." (citations omitted). The court then cited a number of other decisions with approval which. " ... REJECT[ED] the 'shop worn' argument that a[n] [INDIVIDUAL] DEFENDANT IS A SOVEREIGN [a GOVERNMENT] and is beyond the jurisdiction bounds of the district court. (citation omitted)... [and another case] describing defendant's proposed 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN defense as having 'NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW' (citation omitted)... [and another case] DISMISSING [SOVEREIGN CITIZEN] jurisdiction arguments as FRIVOULOUS... ." In the case at bar, the court held, "Regardless of an INDIVIDUAL'S claimed status of descent, be it as a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN,' a 'secured-party creditor,' or a 'flesh-and-blood human being [rather than a corporate fiction],' THAT [INDIVIDUAL] PERSON IS NOT BEYOND THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. These [amateur legal] theories SHOULD BE REJECTED summarily [means "without any delay"], however they are presented." (at paragraph 23 at about 50% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY TYPE OF COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

2. Williams v, Georgia Dept. Of Corrections, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court wrote, "[The Plaintiff's]... claims are brought under a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' [amateur legal] theory. THIS IS A FRIVOLOUS [AMATEUR LEGAL] LEGAL THEORY THAT IS CONSISTENTLY REJECTED BY... [THE] COURTS [read this phrase again]." (citations omitted). The court went on to cite the holdings of other courts in support, "The ... [amateur legal] theories of `SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' are NOT ESTABLISHED LAW IN THIS COURT OR ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY'S VALID LEGAL SYSTEM (citations omitted)... [and another decision] finding the SOVEREIGN CITIZEN argument to be to 'WHOLLY INSUBSTANTIAL AND FRIVOLOUS' (citation omitted)... [and another decision which] REJECT[ED] THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN ARGUMENT as 'SHOP WORN' and FRIVOLOUS.'" In the case at bar, the court held, "The Court [referring to itself] therefore finds that [the Plaintiff's SOVEREIGN CITIZEN]... LEGAL THEORY is also 'INDISPUTABLY MERITLESS' [read this phrase again]." (at paragraph 8 in this case at about 90% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

3. Paul v. State Of New York, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case reads, "It is clear [that the Plaintiff]... is an adherent of the 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' movement (citations omitted) which the Second Circuit has described as 'a loosely affiliated group who [mistakenly] believe that the state and federal governments [of "We the People"] lack constitutional legitimacy and therefore have no authority to regulate their behavior.'" (citations omitted)... . The court cited other cases with approval and continued, "So-called SOVEREIGN CITIZENS [mistakenly] believe that they are not subject to government authority [of "We the People"] and [UNSUCCESSFULLY] employ various tactics in an attempt to, among other things, avoid paying taxes, extinguish debts, and derail criminal proceedings. (citation omitted). The `SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT' is well documented. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has classified `SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' as domestic terror threats BECAUSE THEY ARE ANTI-GOVERNMENT [of "We the People"] EXTREMISTS... ." In the case at bar, the court wrote, "The gravamen [core of] of plaintiff's amended complaint is that as a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the ... courts... . [But] contrary to plaintiff's contentions, 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS,' like ALL... [INDIVIDUALS in] the United States, ARE SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE JURISDICTION IN WHICH THEY [FIND THEMSELVES]... ." (citations omitted). The court cited other decisions with approval which found "similar [SOVEREIGN CITIZEN] claims by Moorish Nationals... [to the effect] that they are not subject to... state laws, to be 'MERITLESS'. Plaintiff's purported [means "pretended"] status as a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' 'does NOT enable him to violate state and federal laws [of "We the People"] without consequence.'" (citations omitted). Since... plaintiff's factual allegations in the amended complaint are CLEARLY BASELESS, and "[t]he conspiracy and legal revisionist [amateur legal] theories of 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' are NOT ESTABLISHED LAW IN THIS COURT OR ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY'S VALID LEGAL SYSTEM,"... , plaintiff's amended complaint is both FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY FRIVOLOUS. Accordingly, the amended complaint is sua sponte [means "on the court's own motion"] DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS." (at paragraph 10 at about 75% through the text of the case.). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

4. Frye v. Barbour, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued various government officials who he mistakenly blamed for his many criminal convictions and incarcerations. The court wrote, "[The]... Plaintiff [claims]... that this court lacks jurisdiction over him [because]... he is a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, not subject to the laws of the United States of America... . However, the courts that have [already] considered such 'SOVEREIGN' CITIZEN' claims have found them to be FRIVOLOUS." The court cited other decisions is support which held, "[C]ourts ROUTINELY REJECT "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' claims as FRIVOLOUS. (citation omitted). 'Regardless of an individual's claimed status of descent, be it as a `SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' , a `secured-party creditor,' or a `flesh-and-blood human being [rather than as a corporate fiction],' that person is not beyond the jurisdiction of the courts. These [amateur legal] theories SHOULD BE REJECTED summarily, however they are presented.' (citation omitted). '[S]OVEREIGN CITIZEN claims are WHOLLY FRIVOLOUS [read that phrase again].'" (at the 12th paragraph, not including block indented portions, at about 85% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

5. Dudley v. Eggert, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued a government official for "seeking to incarcerate a SOVEREIGN and NATURAL FREE-MAN of the land [referring to himself] and extort [his] money without a contract threatening [his] liberty [as if a contract were necessary]." The court held that "[courts have]... "REPEATEDLY REJECTED... [such amateur legal] theories of INDIVIDUAL [rather than collective] SOVEREIGNTY, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk." (citation omitted). SOVEREIGN CITIZEN [amateur legal] theories are typically raised by defendants in criminal prosecutions or by tax protestors, but courts in this Circuit HAVE [ALSO] SUMMARILY REJECTED THEM in other contexts as well. (citation omitted). The court cited another case in support which "REJECT[ED] the plaintiff's SOVEREIGN CITIZEN challenge to state child support proceedings as "SHOP WORN" and "FRIVOLOUS." (at the 3rd to last paragraph at about 85% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

6. Hoglund v. Indiana, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, a prisoner (and amateur legal theorist) unsuccessfully sued various state agencies and officials for imaginary misconduct that he mistakenly claimed resulted in his convictions. He alleged that government officials created laws "meant to control the people a as [fictional] legal entities, but not the SOVEREIGN man [referring to himself]... ." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "The court of appeals has "REPEATEDLY REJECTED... [amateur legal] theories of INDIVIDUAL [rather than collective] SOVEREIGNTY, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk." (citation omitted). Even if an individual claims the status of "a `SOVEREIGN CITIZEN,' a `secured-party creditor,' or a `flesh-and-blood human being,' that person is not beyond the jurisdiction of the courts. These [amateur legal] theories SHOULD BE REJECTED summarily, however they are presented." (citation omitted). The court also cited another case in support which "describe[d] defendant's 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' defense as having "NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW.'" The court ruled, "Because all three of Plaintiff's claims rest on his [amateur legal] theories of SOVEREIGN CITIZENSHIP, this complaint must be DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS." (at the 3rd and 4th paragraph at about 85% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

7. U.S. v. Johnson, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the Defendant was charged with filing a fraudulent lien against a federal employee. The Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the charges and claimed to be "a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" and thus [claimed] the court ha[d] no jurisdiction over him." But the court held otherwise and wrote, "[T]he Seventh Circuit HAS READILY REJECTED such arguments alleging the SOVEREIGNTY OF [INDIVIDUAL] CITIZENS, finding such arguments to be FRIVOLOUS." (citation omitted). The court also cited other cases in support, one of which, "REJECT[ED] the 'SHOP WORN' argument that a defendant is a SOVEREIGN ["a GOVERNMENT"] and is beyond the jurisdiction bounds of the district court'... [and another case which] "DISMISS[ED] [a] lack of personal jurisdiction argument as FRIVOLOUS because [federal district] COURTS HAVE JURISDICTION OVER [ALL] DEFENDANTS [charged with]... VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL LAW. A [FEDERAL] DISTRICT COURT HAS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER A DEFENDANT WHO 'IS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES.'(citation omitted). Thus [A] DEFENDANT... WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES [IS] … SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.' (citation omitted)... . Therefore, the Court REJECTS Defendant's argument that he is somehow a SOVEREIGN ["a GOVERNMENT"]... WHO IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT." TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

8. U.S. v Schneider, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the Defendant was convicted and sentenced to prison for five years for mailing a threatening letter to a judge (just like Rod Class routinely does). His sole defense to the charges was that "he is a FREE, SOVEREIGN CITIZEN and as such not subject to the jurisdiction of the federal courts." But, the court disagreed and wrote, "[T]hat defense has NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW... ." (at the 2nd paragraph at about 40% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

9. Bey v. Indiana, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist sued the state to stop it from taxing his real property. This case reads, "Bey says he's a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' and therefore can't lawfully be taxed by Indiana or its subdivisions in the absence of a contract between them and him [as if a contract was necessary]." (citations omitted). But, the court wrote, "We have REPEATEDLY REJECTED such claims. (citations omitted). We do so [REJECT SUCH CLAIMS] in this case as well... ." (at the 2nd paragraph at about 35% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

10. Osoria v. Connecticut" https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist who was convicted for sexually molesting a child sued the state that convicted and imprisoned him. The court wrote, "... Plaintiff's complaint MUST BE DISMISSED as... FAILING TO STATE A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM... and AS "FRIVOLOUS"... because it is based on an "INDISPUTABLY MERITLESS LEGAL THEORY [referring to SOVEREIGN CITIZEN THEORY]. (citation omitted). Given the language of Plaintiff's Complaint — declaring himself a "real flesh and blood man," "a natural born, free, living, breathing, flesh and blood human with SENTIENT and more existence... upon the soil, and "the living man,"... Plaintiff appears to consider himself a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN'... . Numerous Circuits have ... REJECTED [the]... underlying premise [of SOVEREIGN CITIZENS to the effect] that federal courts lack jurisdiction over all 'LIVING MEN.'" (citations omitted). In support, the court cited a number of holdings from other cases as follows, "[T]o the extent that the plaintiff argues that he is a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN and not subject to... [state] laws, [such an argument is]`WHOLLY INSUBSTANTIAL AND FRIVOLOUS.' (citations omitted). Defendants claiming to be 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' assert that the federal government [of "We the People"] is illegitimate and insist that they are not subject to its jurisdiction. [But] [t]he [SOVEREIGN CITIZEN] defense has `NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW.'... ." The court then wrote, "[Federal and state courts]... have SIMILARLY DISMISSED "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" claims." Then, in citing those other courts, the court wrote, "... [A]rguments common to the "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" movement[]... have been CONSISTENTLY REJECTED by federal courts." (citation omitted). The court then cited another case which held, "This Court adds its voice TO THE JUDICIAL CHORUS [means hundreds of other courts] REJECTING, AS LEGALLY UNSUPPORTABLE, SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN-BASED challenges to federal law." (citation omitted). The court cited another case which held, "The`SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' BELIEF SYSTEM has been described by other courts as `COMPLETELY WITHOUT MERIT, 'PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS', and HAVING 'NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW. (citations omitted)... ." In the case at bar, the court wrote, "[t]he crux of Osorio's Complaint is that [courts]... have no 'jurisdiction over living men.' [He argues that]... because... SOVEREIGN [CITIZENS]... are not named in the codes, [they]... are not subject to the codes... . He explicitly asserts that he, the "Secured Party/Plaintiff is not a subject of, or to . . . the United States Constitution, its Ordinances, Statutes, Codes, or Regulations... . Because Plaintiff's claims are ALL PREMISED on this "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN"... theory, THEY [ALL] FAIL TO STATE A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED. (citation omitted). Accordingly, they [the Plaintiff's claims] are "FRIVOLOUS" and WILL BE DISMISSED... ." (at the 25th, 26th, and 27th paragraph beginning at about 75% through the text, and at the 2nd to LAST paragraph at about 95% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE IN ANY COURT. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

THE BOTTOM LINE: Note that ALL amateur legal theories (ex: "individuals are sovereign and exempt from the law") are always EXACTLY BACKWARDS AND OPPOSITE to what the REAL law actually is. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! Amateur legal theories ARE NOT REAL. They are FAKE. They are LIES. Amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the EXACT OPPOSITES of one another. Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used by the REAL legal system and the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD. Amateur legal theories have a 100% FAILURE RATE in court BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE. They are NOT INTENDED TO WORK and they DO NOT WORK! They never have. They never will. Their SOLE PURPOSE is to attempt to discredit and delegitimize our REPUBLICAN form of government, the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and intended to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. Nothing more.

FACT: Just in case you do not already know, all FUTURE DECISIONS on the subject of whether individuals are "sovereign" an exempt from the law WILL FOLLOW THE DECISIONS SHOWN ABOVE (CALLED "PRECEDENT"). So, the law on this same subject will always be the same as reflected in the cases above. https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/binding-precedent/. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent. https://dictionary.thelaw.com/binding-precedent/.

HOW THIS STUPID MISTAKE CAME ABOUT:
Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists are unable to distinguish between PLURAL terms and SINGULAR terms. This inability results in much of their confusion about the law. In a republican form of government, such as ours, "WE" (a PLURAL term) the "PEOPLE" (also a PLURAL term) exercise our power and control over our own government COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) through the ELECTION process. But, as INDIVIDUALS, we exercise no such power or control. In a republican form of government, such as ours, the authority of a government depends on the COLLECTIVE (not INDIVIDUAL) "consent" of the "governed" (also a PLURAL term) COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process. But, as INDIVIDUALS, our "consent" to our government (contractual or otherwise), to its jurisdiction or to our laws IS NOT REQUIRED or relevant.

7TH GRADE CIVICS: In a republican form of government such as ours, there are THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. This prevents tyranny from any single branch of government. This legal principle is called the "SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE" which is found in the constitution of every state and in the constitution of the United States. Our three branches of government are the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch (the ELECTED statutory law makers), the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch (the ELECTED law enforcement officials and their appointees) and the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch (the ELECTED judges, the ELECTED prosecutors and the ELECTED public defenders of the courts). Through the ELECTION process, "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) control ALL THREE BRANCHES of our own government. But, as INDIVIDUALS, we have no such control.

In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our state statutes, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT ELECTED state LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES to change or repeal the state statutes that we do not like. This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED LEGISLATORS (our SENATORS and CONGRESS MEN & WOMEN) as well as our locally ELECTED law/ordinance makers (county commissioners, city commissioners and city council members, etc.).

In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state law enforcement officials, their appointees or their practices, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT state ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to change the appointees and/or practices that we do not like (different Governor, different County Sheriffs, different City Police Chiefs, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED law enforcement officer (our PRESIDENT ).

In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state judges, their practices or their rulings , then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT different ELECTED state JUDGES (different Supreme Court Justices, different appellate judges, different circuit judges, different county judges, different city judges, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with respect to our ELECTED state prosecutors (state attorneys and district attorneys) and our ELECTED state public defenders. NOTE: In the federal courts, judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, both of which are ELECTED by "We the People". But, those ELECTED representatives of "We the People" (who do the nominating and confirming of our federal judges) can be removed from office by the ELECTION process as well. The ELECTED President also appoints the federal prosecutors. But, the President can be removed from office by the ELECTION process too. Some state jurisdictions even use a combination of BOTH systems whereby judges are first APPOINTED to the bench by ELECTED representatives of "We the People", but then must withstand a "retention" vote by "We the People" every single ELECTION cycle thereafter in order to remain on the bench.

Regardless, EVERY single person in EVERY single branch of our STATE and FEDERAL government is put into office DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY by "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

The fundamental mistake made by ALL AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS is their inability to comprehend the difference between the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute) and the ABSENCE of power of the SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (which is almost nothing) when opposing the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute).

Every single amateur legal theory ever promoted reflects a basic misunderstanding of this simple legal principle, "THE MAJORITY RULES and the INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT." All amateur legal theorists get this simple legal principle exactly BACKWARDS (or OPPOSITE) to what the law really is (a common problem in amateur legal theory).

It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW MAKERS to pass our state statutes and to make them binding upon all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to ticket, arrest and charge any INDIVIDUAL in the state who violates our state statutes without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state JUDGES to preside over state court proceedings of such an INDIVIDUAL without that INDIVIDUAL’S "consent" (“contractual or otherwise”).

This means that in a republican form of government such as ours, an INDIVIDUAL'S "consent” (“contractual” or otherwise) is NOT REQUIRED in such matters. Instead, in a republican form of government such as ours, "CONSENT” TO THE LAW COMES FROM “WE THE PEOPLE” COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, NOT FROM THE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL OUTSIDE THE ELECTION PROCESS.

THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ALREADY HAVE THE COLLECTIVE “CONSENT” OF “WE THE PEOPLE” TO MAKE OUR LAW, TO ENFORCE OUR LAW AND TO PUNISH FOR VIOLATIONS OF OUR LAW.

Under our federal and state constitutions, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT DO NOT ALSO NEED THE INDIVIDUAL “CONSENT” OF ANY INDIVIDUAL TO CARRY OUT THOSE FUNCTIONS.

So, every single legal burden placed on the INDIVIDUAL in a republican form of government such as ours is a legal burden that is placed upon the INDIVIDUAL directly or indirectly by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

In a republican form of government such as ours, the power of the INDIVIDUAL is limited to VOTING, RUNNING FOR OFFICE and to enforcing what few INDIVIDUAL rights and protections that "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) allow the INDIVIDUAL to have (such as those INDIVIDUAL rights and protections listed in the Bill Of Rights).

In a republican form of government such as ours, these INDIVIDUAL rights and protections of the INDIVIDUAL are determined by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (NOT BY THE INDIVIDUAL).

This is why in a republican form of government, such as ours, ELECTIONS ARE SO IMPORTANT. In a republican form of government such as ours, ELECTIONS (which reflect the will of the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY) DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONTROL EVERYTHING ABOUT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT.

THESE ELECTIONS DETERMINE WHAT OUR LAWS ARE, WHO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ARE, WHO OUR JUDGES ARE, WHO OUR PROSECUTORS ARE, WHO OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE AND THEY DETERMINE WHAT ANY DESIRED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS OR REPEALS MIGHT BE.

FACT: THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR STATUTES VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR COURTS VALID, OUR JUDGES VALID, OUR PROSECUTORS VALID AND OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS VALID.

FACT: In a republican form of government such as ours, every conviction of a single INDIVIDUAL involves the efforts of ALL THREE ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT (the ELECTED LAW MAKERS who write the statutes, the ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS whose appointees make the arrests and who file the charges, the ELECTED JUDGES who preside over proceedings in court AND the ELECTED PROSECUTORS who attempt to convict the statutory violators in court).

In a republican form of government such as ours, NO SINGLE ELECTED BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CAN CONVICT AN INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF THE OTHER TWO ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.

FACT: The people who oppose, defy and seek the overthrow our ELECTED government, our ELECTED legislatures, our ELECTED executive (law enforcement) officials, our ELECTED judges, our ELECTED prosecutors and our ELECTED public defenders ACTUALLY OPPOSE, DEFY AND SEEK THE OVERTHROW OF OUR REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT ITSELF and in so doing, SEEK TO OVERTHROW THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF "WE THE PEOPLE" OURSELVES. This desire to overthrow our ELECTED republican form of government and the will of the majority of "We the People " COLLECTIVELY, along with his long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and his MULTIPLE weapons-related FELONIES are the reasons that Rod Class, has been placed on the United States "TERRORIST WATCH LIST".

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 76 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our ELECTED REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. For more on Rod Class, CLICK HERE. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...61#post1175261.

More importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. For more on Rod Class, CLICK HERE. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...61#post1175261.

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #126.

[snoop4truth]

This post is a work in progress.


"The FAKE Jim Traficant Speech Hoax". This hoax involves a FAKE and FORGED "transcript" of a speech that a Congressman allegedly made to Congress to the effect that our federal government went bankrupt in 1933. (The REAL transcript of this speech is in the official "Congressional Record" and does NOT say this.). Deborah Tavares, herself, actually posted this FAKE and FORGED document on her own website. Deborah Tavares has also posted several videos on YouTube wherein she quotes this document despite knowing that it is a FORGERY. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9FU2J8qh4U (13:30-18:05); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GKZSTbtBgo (at 7:15-11:01); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoX5IEgaL9Y (at 14:00-17:15); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltdARR9nLLs (44:10-46:20); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSxXWwUuJRE (at 2:15-4:00); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_wY5aYkujw (at 21:55-23:45). Whether or not the United States actually went bankrupt in 1933 is irrelevant to this hoax. The hoax is that Deborah Tavares knowingly uses uses a document that she knows to be a FORGERY in support of that proposition. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that they themselves are "collateral" and debt slaves who exist solely to pay debts arising out of that alleged "bankruptcy" and to make Americans think that our government is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. See proof here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llh0ULNz918 (1:50-2:15);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D78hBBAH7hk (at 58:10-58:50).


FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #158.

[snoop4truth]

NOTE: Al Whitney's ("Anita Laurin's) website, anticorruptionsociety.com has been taken down. So, some of the links below no longer work. Fortunately, the links below to the most important documents (which are PDF's or which Al Whitney uploaded to other websites) still work well.

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX:

VIDEO OF DEBORAH TAVARES' PARTNERS ENGAGED IN THIS HOAX.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ruq2LMDCcg (Here, Al Whitney, Rod Class and a co-conspirator pretend to be "shocked" while reviewing their OWN FORGERY).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxCIJZI74Oo
(Here, Al Whitney, Rod Class and a co-conspirator pretend to be "shocked" while reviewing their OWN FORGERY).

NOTE: Because Deborah Tavares found out that I was going to expose this particular hoax, she panicked and took down her epic YouTube video wherein she spent hours engaged in this hoax and wherein she pretended to be "shocked" and "horrified" by her FAKE government document (which she herself actually created). It was absolutely priceless! It was TRULY OSCAR WORTHY!


ARTICLES PEDDLING THE HOAX:
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/ (A fraudulent article. Note website.)
https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/ (Note the author of this fraudulent article.)
https://i-uv.com/court-registry-investment-system-cris

THE FINISHED FORGERY:
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE.).

TIME LINE:
Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class (as "Judge DALE" ) and Al Whitney HAVE BEEN COLLABERATING on hoaxes SINCE AT LEAST APRIL 10, 2010, the ACTUAL DATE on which Deborah Tavares, herself, POSTED THE FOLLOWING "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY ON HER OWN WEBSITE. http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. In January 2011, Al Whitney posted the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (THE FORGERY EXPOSED HERE) on wordpress.com. Since that date, Deborah Tavares and her partners have PUBLICLY CREDITED Rodney "DALE" Class (NOT "JUDGE DALE") with the "discovery" of that "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY. For proof, Scroll down to just above the video here. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/. For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. But, a year later in 2012, Deborah Tavares, without thinking it through, incorporated that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (which she had publicly credited to Rod Class) into a book which she claims was written by "Judge DALE". See page 5 here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Sometimes, Deborah Tavares has a hard time keeping all of her lies straight.

THE HOAX:
In "THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX", Deborah Tavares and her partners (including Rod Class, Al Whitney and Jeanette Triplett) fraudulently claimed to have "discovered" a "secret" or "leaked" government document which she claims "PROVES" that ALL OF THE MONEY that the public ever pays to the courts in FINES and PENALTIES is forwarded on to the "Federal Reserve" to keep (in the same way the IRS collects money from income earners and allegedly forwards it to the Federal Reserve to keep). The purpose of this hoax (like the "Judge DALE Hoax") was to make Americans think that the American justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT Americans.

To carry out this hoax, Deborah Tavares and her partners fraudulently MANUFACTURED a FAKE document to support of their hoax (just like they did with all three of the "Judge DALE FORGERIES" ) and they made their forgery LOOK like an official government document. BUT, THEY MADE SOME STUPID MISTAKES shown below!

IMPORTANT LEGAL BACKGROUND:
Most state and federal court houses have a "COURT REGISTRY". A court registry is a court-supervised, escrow-type account managed at an office in the court house. In extremely rare cases (when the ownership or right to money is in dispute), litigants voluntarily (and temporarily) deposit money into the court registry until their case is over at which time the judge orders the clerk to pay the money deposited to the winning side in the case. ALL OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A COURT REGISTRY GOES ONLY TO THE LITIGANTS THEMSELVES. NO OTHER PARTY OF ANY TYPE EVER KEEPS ANY OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A COURT REGISTERY. Less than one percent of all cases involve such a deposit into a "Court Registry". So, such deposits are extremely rare. (Have you ever made a deposit into a "Court Registry"?)

ILLUSTRATION OF HOW A COURT REGISTRY ACTUALLY WORKS (a REAL case):
A car owner obtains a written repair estimate of $1,000 from a repair shop and on that basis, puts his car into the repair shop for repairs. When the owner returns to pick up his repaired car, the repair shop refuses to release it to the owner unless the owner pays the repair shop $2,000 for the repairs.

But, the car owner knows the law. So, he goes to the court house and deposits $2,000 into the court registry (the total amount in dispute), obtains a receipt for that deposit and obtains a court order which requires the repair shop to immediately release his repaired car to him on the grounds that all of the money sought by the repair shop (all $2,000) is safe and is on deposit in the court registry.

A month later at the trial, the judge rules that the repair shop is bound by its written repair estimate of $1,000 and orders the clerk to pay the repair shop $1,000 (the amount of the original repair estimate) and to refund $1,000 to the car owner (the amount of the overcharge). Thus, only the litigants themselves receive the money that is deposited into a court registry.

By voluntarily (and temporarily) depositing money into the court registry BEFORE the case began, the car owner got to use his car while waiting for his court case to be resolved, 30 days. If the car owner had not voluntarily deposited money into the court registry, he would not have been able to use his car for this 30 day period. So, the purpose of a court registry is to BENEFIT and PROTECT the litigants themselves.

THE COURT REGISTRY "INVESTMENT SYSTEM"
Courts are not banks. So, courts themselves must deposit money deposited into their court registries into banks or other financial institutions. In so doing, courts earn "interest" on those deposits. But, depositing court registry money into commercial banks is risky. Banks can fail and the interest rates that banks pay on deposits are very low. To remedy these two problems, Congress passed the Court Registry Investment System Act. Under this Act, federal courts now "deposit" their court registry money into the U.S. Treasury because, unlike banks, the U.S. Treasury cannot fail and because the interest rates that the U.S. Treasury pays on those “deposits” is higher than the interest rates paid by banks.

That means the Court Registry “INVESTMENT SYSTEM” is about the courts EARNING INTEREST (ONLY) on court registry deposits. It has NOTHING to do with the PRINCIPLE amount of money deposited into a court registry, because all of that money belongs only to litigants themselves. But, Deborah Tavares and her partners do not know enough to even realize this.

THE FORGERY:
Deborah Tavares and her partners found a REAL government document reflecting a REAL CASH FLOW DIAGRAM accurately depicting how the "Court Registry Investment System" actually works (described above).This diagram graphically depicted (with both DRAWINGS and WORDS): 1). a litigant depositing money into a court registry; 2). the court "depositing" that money into the U.S. Treasury (ACTUALLY SHOWING A DRAWING WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED THE “UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING”); 3). the U.S. Treasury returning that money to the court; and 4). the court paying that money to the winning litigant in the case. (Obviously, Deborah Tavares and her partners overlooked this final step in the diagram, THE RETURN OF ALL OF THE MONEY DEPOSITED TO THE WINNING LITIGANT IN THE CASE.). See the current (ALTERED) version of that diagram here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

But, the original (UNALTERED) version of the "CASH FLOW DIAGRAM" did not incite hatred or violence against innocent Americans. So, in order to incite that hatred and violence against innocent Americans, Deborah Tavares and her partners FRAUDULENTLY ALTERED the original diagram to make it look like the courts collect money from litigants AND THEN FORWARD IT TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO KEEP (to create the illusion that the courts are merely “collection agents” for the Federal Reserve). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Specifically, Deborah Tavares and her partners fraudulently deleted the original label on the diagram which originally read, "UNITED STATES TREASURY (UST)” (UNDER THE DRAWING WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED THE "UNITED STATE TREASURY BUILDING") and they FRAUDULENTLY replaced that ORIGINAL LABEL with a FAKE label which now reads, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)”. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

We know the current words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” which now appear in the diagram were FORGED because of THE TINY WORDS STILL INSIDE THE ARROW ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE DIAGRAM WHICH DEBORAH TAVARES AND HER PARTNERS OBVIOUSLY OVERLOOKED. These words read, “DEPOSIT IN TREASURY” (referring to courts depositing court registry money into the U.S. Treasury, not depositing money into the Federal Reserve “BANK” as the diagram now reads). Note also that the tiny arrow on the left side of the diagram POINTS DIRECTLY TO THE DRAWING IN THE CENTER OF THE DIAGRAM WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTS THE “UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING” (not the Federal Reserve “BANK”). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

We also know that the current words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because they are THE ONLY WORDS ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DIAGRAM which consist SOLELY OF ALL CAPITAL LETTERS (an inconsistency that a real government document would not contain). Not even the TITLE of the diagram appears in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Likewise, we also know that the words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because they are THE ONLY WORDS ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DIAGRAM which consist SOLELY OF LARGER, BOLD-FACED TYPE (an inconsistency that a real government document would not contain). Not even the TITLE of the diagram appears in LARGER, BOLD-FACED TYPE. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Note that it was a similar stupid mistake which led to the discovery that Deborah Tavares' emails were FORGED in the "FORGED PG&E Email Hoax" which is explained on page one of this thread. And, PATTERNS OF CONDUCT NEVER LIE!

We also know that the words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because the federal government DOES NOT refer to the "Federal Reserve SYSTEM" or the "Federal Reserve BUILDING" in Washington, D.C. as the "Federal Reserve BANK" (a stupid mistake that a real government document would not contain). https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf. There is NO SINGLE "Federal Reserve BANK". Instead, there are 12 regional "Federal Reserve Banks", none of which look anything like the "United States Treasury Building" WHICH IS UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED IN THE DIAGRAM.

Note that it was a similar stupid mistake which led to the discovery that Deborah Tavares' emails were FORGED in the "FORGED PG&E Email Hoax" which is explained on page one of this thread. And, PATTERNS OF CONDUCT NEVER LIE!

Deborah Tavares and her partners used this FORGED, MISTAKE-RIDDLED diagram as the “COVER” page for the FAKE government document which they manufactured in support of this hoax. Then, they attached dozens of other documents to their FORGED COVER page. These documents attached included, among other things, a series of spread sheets indicating how much money certain federal courts HAD ON DEPOSIT at the U.S. Treasury on a particular date (often millions of dollars). FOR PROOF, SCROLL DOWN HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf. But, Deborah Tavares fraudulently told her video audience that all of the money appearing on the spread sheets WAS FORWARDED TO THE "FEDERAL RESERVE" to keep. But, this claim was not so. All of the principle amounts of money reflected on those spread sheets WAS RETURNED ONLY TO THE WINNING LITIGANTS THEMSELVES AT THE END OF THEIR CASE.).

Further, Deborah Tavares and her partners ALSO failed to check the lower right hand corner of the diagram that they used for the “COVER” of their FAKE government document. The page number in the lower right hand corner of that COVER page of their FAKE government document is marked page "2". But, the very next page in their FAKE document is numbered page "1" and all of the following pages are sequentially numbered (in at least one version of this FORGERY). This means that the COVER page that Deborah Tavares and her partners used on their FAKE government document is not only RIDDLED WITH STUPID MISTAKES (described above), it also CAME FROM AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DOCUMENT than the pages attached to it. This means that Deborah Tavares and her partners ASSEMBLED THEIR FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT FROM PARTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS (an inconsistency and a stupid mistake that a REAL government document would not contain). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Finally, in at least one version of this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares and her partners went through EVERY SINGLE PAGE of their entire FAKE government document and fraudulently REPLACED the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) with the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) to make the interior of their FAKE government document "MATCH" the exterior COVER of their FAKE government document (to the effect that all money collected by courts is forwarded to the Federal Reserve). In other versions of this same FAKE government document, almost all reference to the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) and the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY ERASED from the pages attached to the FORGED COVER page of their FAKE government document.

Suffice it to say, this FAKE government document is a FORGERY and was assembled from parts of other documents with conflicting page numbers, neither of which would be the case with a REAL government document.

PROOF:
THE COVER OF DEBORAH TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT:
https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE). Note that this VERY SAME fake government diagram which Deborah Tavares and her partners attribute to Rodney "DALE" Class above appears INSIDE “The Great American Adventure: Secrets of America” which Deborah Tavares attributes to "Judge DALE" and which Deborah Tavares posted on her own website in 2012. See page actually numbered "5" here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Remember, since early 2011, Deborah Tavares and her partners have been publicly attributing the "discovery" of the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY to Rod Class (not to "Judge DALE"). THIS PROVES THAT DEBORAH TAVARES IS AFFILIATED WITH AND PUBLISHES THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON HER OWN WEBSITE, WITHIN THE SAME DOCUMENT.

WHAT THE U.S. TREASURY BUILDING ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22U...w=1093&bih=518
COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

WHAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BUILDING ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22F...g+Washington+D. C.%22&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_5P7I3-fZAhWS0FMKHV7-DxoQ_AUIDCgD&biw=1366&bih=651. COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

Note here that the COVER of Deborah Tavares FAKE government document unmistakably depicts the "UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING" (shown directly above), but Deborah Tavares fraudulently re-labeled it the "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK" (to make it fit her hoax). Note also the PAGE NUMBER "2" in the lower right corner of the COVER page of Deborah Tavares’ FAKE government document. Finally, note that the following page is NUMBERED PAGE ONE "1" and that all subsequent pages are sequentially numbered (proving that this mistake-riddled COVER page came from an entirely different document than the rest this FAKE government document came from and that it was assembled from parts of other documents.). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

NOTE: Because Deborah Tavares found out that I was going to expose this particular hoax, she panicked and took down her epic YouTube video wherein she spent hours engaged in this hoax and wherein she pretended to be "shocked" and "horrified" by her FAKE government document (which she herself actually created). It was absolutely priceless! It was TRULY OSCAR WORTHY!

CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM DOES NOT FORWARD MONEY COLLECTED BY THE COURTS TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO KEEP. To the contrary, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM MERELY EARNS "INTEREST" (ONLY) ON THE MONEY THAT IS TEMPORARILY DEPOSITED INTO THE COURT REGISTRY UNTIL THE CASE IS OVER, AT WHICH TIME ALL OF THAT MONEY IS AWARDED TO THE WINNING SIDE IN THE CASE.

FOR THE NEXT FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATION OF A DEBORAH TAVARES HOAX, GO TO POST #58.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE AGENDA 21 HOAX.

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eborah-Tavares

THE HOAX: In the "Agenda 21 Hoax", Deborah Tavares claims to have discovered another secret or leaked document which she fraudulently claims proves that the United Nations is using diabolical methods (like fires) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so.

AGENDA 21 IS A 100 PAGE DOCUMENT. Agenda 21 was written by the world's leading environmental scientists (not by "PG&E", the "Rothschilds" or the "Rockefellers"). Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

According to the "Agenda 21" document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), its purpose is to SLOW DOWN the rate at which the environment is destroyed. It would have PROTECTED MOST OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, REDUCED DROUGHT and INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE.

According to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the purpose of Agenda 21 IS NOT to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated cities in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. Instead, according to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the REAL purpose of Agenda 21 is to PRESERVE MOST OF THE FORESTS THAT REMAIN, exactly the opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax (to the effect that the United Nations destroyed the forests of California in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PRESERVE THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE).

Agenda 21 was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. Agenda 21 does not apply in the United States because it is not the law in the United States and therefore cannot be enforced anywhere in the United States. So, Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

BELOW IS A SECTION OF THE ACTUAL "TABLE OF CONTENTS" OF "AGENDA 21" ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF "AGENDA 21".

SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
11. COMBATING DEFORESTATION 11.1 - 11.40
12. MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING desertification and DROUGHT 12.1 - 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
15. CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY15.1 - 15.11
16. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 16.1 - 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
18.PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: application of integrated approaches to the development, MANAGEMENT and use OF WATER RESOURCES 18.1 - 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international
traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 - 20.46
21. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF solid wastes and SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES 21.1 - 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes

AND, ALL OF THIS IS ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF AGENDA 21 HERE.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf

BELOW IS THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf
(THIS IS A MUST READ.). BEGIN AT SECTION 11.1 AT ABOUT 25% THROUGH THE TEXT. THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21 READS AS FOLLOWS:
AGENDA 21 – CHAPTER 11


COMBATING DEFORESTATION

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Sustaining the multiple roles and functions of all types of FORESTS, FOREST LANDS and WOODLANDS.
Basis for action

11.1. There are major weaknesses in the policies, methods and mechanisms adopted to support and develop the multiple ecological, economic, social and cultural roles of TREES, FORESTS, and FOREST LANDS. Many developed countries are confronted with the effects of air pollution and FIRE DAMAGE ON THEIR FORESTS. More effective measures and approaches are often required at the national level to improve and harmonize policy formulation, planning and programming; legislative measures and instruments; development patterns; participation of the general public, especially women and indigenous people; involvement of youth; roles of the private sector, local organizations, non-governmental organizations and cooperatives; development of technical and multidisciplinary skills and quality of human resources; FORESTRY extension and public education; research capability and support; administrative structures and mechanisms, including intersectoral coordination, decentralization and responsibility and incentive systems; and dissemination of information and public relations. This is especially important to ensure a rational and holistic approach to the sustainable and environmentally sound development of FORESTS. The need for securing the multiple roles of FORESTS and FOREST LANDS through adequate and appropriate institutional strengthening has been repeatedly emphasized in many of the reports, decisions and recommendations of FAO, ITTO, UNEP, the World Bank, IUCN and other organizations.

Objectives
11.2. The objectives of this programme area are as follows:
a. To STRENGTHEN FOREST-RELATED NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, to enhance the scope and effectiveness
of activities related to the management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of FORESTS, and to effectively ensure the sustainable utilization and production of FORESTS' goods and services in both the developed and the developing countries; by the year 2000, to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of national institutions to enable them to acquire the necessary knowledge for the PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS, as well as to expand their scope and, correspondingly, enhance the effectiveness of programmes and activities related to the management and development of FORESTS;
b. To strengthen and improve human, technical and professional skills, as well as expertise and capabilities to effectively formulate and implement policies, plans, programmes, research and projects on management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of all
types of FORESTS and FOREST-based resources, and FOREST LANDS inclusive, as well as other areas from which FORESTS BENEFITS CAN BE DERIVED.

AND, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 11 OF AGENDA 21!

IMPORTANT: You will note from the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21, that THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR INCREMENTALLY REDUCING THE AREAS ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE (to systematically drive them from their rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21 itself, its actual WRITTEN purpose is to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). See Post #166 in the link at the very top of this thread for an excellent discussion of this.

THE AGENDA 21 MAP: CLICK ON THE THIS LINK. ONCE THERE, CLICK ON THE TWO (2) YELLOW, ORANGE AND RED MAPS.

https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Fm6zNgdf57I

The Agenda 21 MAP of the United States is self-explanatory. It VISUALLY indicates that the purpose of Agenda 21 is TO LIMIT FURTHER DEFORESTATION, as described in the Agenda 21 document above. Note that the Agenda 21 map was made in or before 1992. Note that at the time it was made (in or before 1992), the remaining forests on the map that were to be off-limits to FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) DEFORESTATION were the FORESTS and WILDERNESS AREAS that remained undeveloped at that time (in or before 1992). Note also that those making the Agenda 21 map often tried to "CONNECT" isolated wilderness areas with one another using narrow (very thin) "migration trails" so that animals might find mates outside their tiny wilderness "reservations" so as to ensure "BIO-DIVERSITY" (also a stated goal of Agenda 21).

IMPORTANT: You will note by looking at the Agenda 21 map, that THERE IS NO AREA OF THE MAP OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE THAT HAS BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE (OR MADE SMALLER) THAN THE AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE AT THE TIME THE MAP WAS MADE IN 1992. So, there is likewise nothing about the Agenda 21 map which suggests that people will occupy less of an area than they occupy now (or that might suggest that people will be systematically driven from their rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to areas on the Agenda 21 map for which FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) development would be off-limits, it is perfectly obvious (when looking at the map) that the actual purpose of Agenda 21 was to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). No other conclusion is logically possible by looking at the Agenda 21 map.

LOGICAL CONCLUSION:
Unless the forgoing official documents taken from the ACTUAL PAGES of Agenda 21 are forgeries, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES DID NOT ADVANCE THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (TO PREVENT FURTHER DEFORESTATION). INDEED, THEY ACTUALLY UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (BY DESTROYING THE VERY FORESTS THAT AGENDA 21 WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT)!

AS A RESULT, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES WERE NOT AGENDA 21 FIRES, EVEN IF THEY WERE THE RESULT OF SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY, unrelated to Agenda 21.

APPLICATION:
If I were a charlatan, and if I wanted to create a BETTER version of the Agenda 21 Hoax, this is how I would do it.

1. I would create videos and I would show the REAL, ACTUAL "AGENDA 21" DOCUMENT (unmodified) showing the Agenda 21 "agenda" AS IT IS ACTUALLY WRITTEN in the official document (showing that its purpose is to PROTECT THE REMAINING FORESTS, PREVENT DROUGHT AND ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE (all of which is verifiably true).

2. Then, in my videos, I would show written proof that "Agenda 21" was EFFECTIVELY REJECTED by the U.S. Government as a whole AND THAT IT IS NOT THE LAW, AND THEREFORE NOT ENFORCEABLE ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES (all of which is verifiably true).

3. Then, in my videos, I would show ALL OF THE ENVIROMENTAL CALAMITIES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS SINCE 1992, when Agenda 21 was first proposed and effectively rejected by the U.S. Government (DESTRUCTION OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, INCREASED DROUGHT, ABSENCE OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE, PEOPLE RENDERED HOMELESS AND DISPLACED BY FOREST FIRES).

4. Then, in my videos, I would claim that "THE REFUSAL" (ITSELF) of U.S. Government to adopt "Agenda 21" in I992, and every year since then, constitutes conclusive "PROOF" that the U.S. Government ACTUALLY WANTED TO PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL THE REMAINING FORESTS IN CALIFORNIA, PURPOSELY INCREASE DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA AND PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL SUPPLIES OF FRESH WATER IN CALIFORNIA to drive Californians out of their rural and suburban homes and into cities away from the forests and wilderness areas.

That would make a much BETTER "Agenda 21 Hoax", BECAUSE (except for the nefarious intentions of the U.S. Government part) IT IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERIFIABLY AND FACTUALLY TRUE IN EVERY SINGLE RESPECT! That would make for a much more LOGICAL explanation of the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHIES IN CALIFORNIA than the story that Deborah Tavares peddles now (which actually CONTRADICTS Agenda 21).

FACT: When corporate interests are threatened by proposed laws that would reduce their profits, they launch a public relations campaign against those proposed laws. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose the proposed laws for reasons of their own selfish interests. Instead, they pretend that they oppose the proposed laws to protect the interests of society in general (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

EXAMPLE: CONSIDER THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE AS IT RELATES TO AGENDA 21 (THIS MAY NOT HAVE EVER OCCURRED. IT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THIS PRINCIPLE OF CORPORATE P.R WARS.). If made into law, Agenda 21 (a proposed law) would slow the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests (and thereby slow the rate at which they generate profits).

So, these corporate interests launch a public relations campaign against Agenda 21. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose Agenda 21 to protect their own profits. Instead, they pretend to oppose Agenda 21 to protect the rest of society (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

So, they come up with a CAREFULLY-CRAFTED LIE intended to get the rest of society to oppose Agenda 21 as much as they do. Instead of admitting that Agenda 21 would only slow down the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION! They falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY EXPAND THE FORESTS INTO AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ALREADY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS, thereby systematically driving homeowners out of their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, tightly packed, over-populated cities (something that the REAL Agenda 21 would not actually do).

This FRAUDULENT characterization of Agenda 21 would serve to make ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY join with those who profit by destroying the forests. The rest of society would OPPOSE "AGENDA 21" in the mistaken belief THAT THEY WERE SAVING THEIR OWN HOMES IN THE PROCESS. Now, THAT is a brilliant lie. But, it gets even better.

By telling such a lie, logging corporations and real estate developers, like Deborah Tavares, could continue DESTROYING THE FORESTS and continue to cash in without any opposition from the rest of society WHILE SIMULATANEOUSLY BLAMING AGENDA 21 (WHICH NEVER BECAME LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE) FOR THE HARDSHIPS THAT THEY THEMSELVES KNOWINGLY INFLICT ON THE REST OF SOCIETY IN THE PURSUIT OF THEIR PROFITS (increased droughts and therefore increased forest fires, decreased fresh water supplies uncontaminated by sewage, etc.). Now, THAT is a TRULY brilliant lie, blaming a SUGGESTION that never became law, for the hardships suffered by Californians, when the SUGGESTION that never became law WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Remember, the foregoing is only an ILLUSTRATION of how corporate interests engage in disinformation campaigns in order to get society to oppose proposed laws that would reduce their profits. This is an example only. This may have never occurred. That is not the point.

The point is simply that what Deborah Tavares lied to us about what the what Agenda 21 says in the same way she lied to us about every other document she has ever used in support of her claims about the planned extinction of mankind.

I do not know if Deborah Tavares lied to us about the Agenda 21 document for same reasons of the type suggested in the hypothetical illustration above. As far as I am concerned, the reason she lied to us is irrelevant. All that really matters is that she lied to us AGAIN about what a document says is support of her claims of a planned extinction of mankind.

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this Agenda 21 document provides no support for that proposition.

[onawah]

The truth of these matters is already horrible enough and certainly in need of no embellishment at all...

Posted by snoop4truth (here)
The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

[onawah]

That's VERY interesting!!
Thanks for all the updates, Snoop.

FAKE PROOF: To manufacture FAKE "proof" of this hoax, Deborah Tavares obtained some REAL PG&E emails on the subject of "Space Weather" (which, unknown to Tavares, is actually solar flares on the Sun every 11 years which overload and shut down PG&E's ground based solar panels here on Earth). Deborah Tavares then replaced the message portion of those REAL PG&E emails with FAKE messages she FORGED herself to make it look like PG&E just gratuitously admitted to starting all of the fires in California by using Solaren's NEVER MADE, non-existent, future satellites. AT 18:40---21:15 HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOj5RQKsucw. This is precisely why the FORGED message portion of Deborah Tavares' FAKE PG&E emails are in AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT FONT, BOLDNESS AND SIZE to the heading portion of those same FAKE PG&E emails AT 18:40---21:15 AND AT 2:550---22:55 HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOj5RQKsucw.