'Drones' EVERYWHERE, What's Going On?

[Ravenlocke]

Text:
Random objects are flying in broad daylight and they move in ways no known aircraft can. They accelerate instantly, stop midair, change direction without turning, and sometimes vanish. They're not birds, drones, or balloons. We don’t know who made them. We don’t know how they work. But they’re real.

The US Navy captured this footage of a “spherical” UFO near San Diego on July 15th, 2019. What is this object and why isn't the U.S. government willing to declassify information about UFOs?

https://x.com/disclosureorg/status/1908376276504604907

[Ravenlocke]

Text:

The grave implication from this statement by a very senior
@DeptofDefense
official is that perhaps
@POTUS
was deliberately misled when he was officially assured these ‘drones’ were
@FAANews
authorised drones. The White House should investigate if this was an attempt to coverup a serious national security failure. It also definitively disproves the attempts by notorious debunkers to play down these incursions. Why was the public lied to for months?


Text:

NEW: NEW JERSEY 'DRONES'

In testimony before the House Oversight Committee, RADM Paul Spedero, Vice Director for Operations, Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirms unknown "drone" (UAP) incursions over:

-Langley AFB
-Plant 42
-Picatinny Arsenal (NJ)
-Naval Weapons Station Earle (NJ)

https://x.com/rosscoulthart/status/1917318000254017920

https://x.com/RedPandaKoala/status/1917299456212660303

Text:
The FAA needs to publicly explain the statement made from the White House that egregiously misled the American public about the drone incursions over the United States. Were these drones over NJ “FAA authorised” as the White House told us, or not? Why can’t the Federal Aviation Administration answer that basic question? Its non-attendance at the congressional hearing invites suspicion that they are frightened of answering the question.

Text:
BREAKING: FAA COO doesn't show up to Congressional hearing on mystery drone incursions over US Military sites

"Due to unforeseen circumstances the FAA is no longer testifying at today's hearing." Rep. William Timmons

https://x.com/rosscoulthart/status/1917344217896284623

[Denise/Dizi]

This is just my speculation.. I think they were unmanned arial drones, with remote neural "Drivers", perhaps out over the sea, that "Homed autonomously when their connection was lost"...

Perhaps they were somehow unexpectedly broken off from communications from the ship that deployed them.. A satellite pulse maybe?

Someone possibly triggered a weapon that forced a disconnect between the drivers and their craft.The UAV's were possibly being tested to make sure they maintained control over them in such a scenerio.

Rather than return to the ship they were deployed from, perhaps they were intercepted by the base when they went rogue, and began to group there, versus on the deck of whatever released them. OR they were tasked to see if they could take over the drones remotely..

War Games exercises perhaps?

It would stand to reason they would institute a backup plan if a whole pile of large drones went rogue..

I think they have lost connections before and faced catastrophic consequences, and after making alterations, they may have been researching what happens when you lose the "man in the middle..." with their updates.