I ran the transcript from your video through AI with a question that came up for me while listening:
”How can direct experience be achieved?” If you're okay with it, I’ll add my thoughts, followed by the AI summary and notes:
It's been a while since I've consciously devoted myself to the practices taught by Ramana Maharshi and Nisargadatta Maharaj. I'm re-reading, "I AM That". I find the practice more challenging, and notice how easily my attention wanders.
Recently, I've been returning to them with greater intention, yet I seem to struggle more now than I did twenty years ago. Perhaps it's because I'm more aware of my own shortcomings than I was then. Or perhaps I've allowed too much of the noise and nonsense of the outside world consume me.
***************
Provided by AI:
”Both teachers repeatedly emphasized that direct experience cannot be borrowed. Reading books, listening to talks, or accepting someone else's conclusions may be helpful, but they are considered pointers rather than the realization itself.”
”Different methods ultimately direct seekers toward the same recognition of their true nature through direct personal experience rather than belief.”
***************
In the context of Ramana Maharshi and Nisargadatta Maharaj, direct experience means recognizing your own awareness or sense of being without relying on concepts, beliefs, or secondhand descriptions. It is not about acquiring a new experience but investigating the nature of your present experience.
Although their methods differ slightly, both emphasize observation rather than belief.
Ramana Maharshi's approach: Self-inquiry
Ramana's method centers on the question:The question is not meant to be answered intellectually. Instead:- Notice a thought, emotion, or sensation arise.
- Ask, "To whom has this appeared?"
- The immediate answer is usually, "To me."
- Then ask, "Who is this 'me'?"
Rather than thinking about the answer, direct attention toward the one who is aware.
The aim is to see whether the separate "I" that seems to own thoughts and experiences can actually be found.
Nisargadatta Maharaj's approach: Abide in "I am"
Nisargadatta's instruction is simpler in wording but equally demanding:
Remain with the sense "I am."
This means:- Before thinking, "I am a teacher," "I am happy," or "I am tired,"
- Notice the bare feeling that you exist.
- Rest attention there without adding descriptions or stories.
Whenever the mind wanders into memories, plans, or identities, gently return to the simple fact of being.
What "direct experience" looks like
From these traditions, direct experience is not necessarily a dramatic mystical event. It can be as simple as noticing:- Thoughts come and go.
- Emotions come and go.
- Sensations come and go.
- Yet there is an awareness in which all of these appear.
The investigation is into that awareness itself, rather than its contents.
***************
A simple exercise
You can try this for a few minutes:- Sit comfortably without trying to achieve a special state.
- Notice whatever is present—sounds, sensations, thoughts.
- Ask silently:
"What knows this experience?"
- Don't search for a verbal answer.
- Simply observe the awareness in which everything appears.
- If thoughts arise, notice them and return to the observation.
Alternatively, following Nisargadatta:- Close your eyes.
- Notice only the undeniable fact:
"I exist."
- Don't complete the sentence ("I am a...").
- Rest with the simple sense of being.
***************
An important point
Both teachers repeatedly emphasized that direct experience cannot be borrowed. Reading books, listening to talks, or accepting someone else's conclusions may be helpful, but they are considered pointers rather than the realization itself.
Whether one interprets the result as discovering the true Self (Ramana's language) or recognizing pure awareness beyond personal identity (Nisargadatta's language) depends on the philosophical framework one adopts. What both encourage is careful examination of immediate experience rather than relying solely on belief.
From a broader perspective, it's also worth recognizing that different traditions—and cognitive science—interpret these experiences differently. A practitioner may regard them as realization of ultimate reality, while a psychologist might describe them as shifts in attention, self-representation, or consciousness. The experience itself can be meaningful regardless of which interpretation one finds most convincing.
Posted by greybeard
(here)
Why Didn't Nisargadatta Maharaj Agree with Ramana Maharshi when he said THIS...
Love Chris