Vaccine Crimes

[Ewan]

AI designed vaccines

I could think of many objections, erudite comments etc., to explain how I feel about the above, but in order to save time I will simply present the below as my considered response.

[Sue (Ayt)]

I was surprised to find this 2026 article published in a legit medical journal, which I downloaded for the record, in case it gets rescinded.

COVID vaccination and post-infection cancer signals: Evaluating patterns and potential biological mechanisms
(Long publication - can be read at link, but summary in first paragraph of conclusion section, pasted below)

"Conclusions
The collective world-wide evidence from 2020–2025 underscores a biologically plausible connection between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer. The recurring clinical findings documented across many reports of de-novo cancer onset, rapid tumor progression, viral reactivation, and reawakening of dormant disease, highlight critical gaps in knowledge and understanding of how large-scale immune changes produced by the vaccine interacts with cancer biology."
https://www.oncotarget.com/article/28824/text/

[onawah]

The Story the Media &the Government Don’t Want You to Hear
6/187/26
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...t-you-to-hear/
By Sen. Ron Johnson


(Podcast at the link. Not all hyperlinks in the article are embedded here)

Editor’s note: Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) published this op-ed today on X, after The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA TODAY, Fox Digital, NBC News, ABC News, PBS, CNN and MSNow refused to publish, he said.

For more on Johnson’s report, read coverage by The Defender here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ks-suppressed/
and here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...earing-june-3/

"On April 29, as chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Sen. Ron Johnson held a hearing and released a report, “Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals.” According to Johnson, there has “not been a bigger government scandal during my lifetime, and yet even now that we have documented proof of corruption, most of the legacy media refuses to report on it.”

My report details how in March 2021, Peter Marks — director of the FDA center that approves vaccines and is responsible for safety surveillance (CBER) — was briefed that the algorithm they were using to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) would mask or hide COVID-19 vaccine adverse event safety signals. Twenty-six days later, using an updated algorithm, senior FDA officials were shown 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bell’s palsy.

For the next three months, they received updates showing more serious safety signals. Instead of warning or informing the public, they ordered the data analyst to “cease and desist” and then lied to the American public that “they weren’t seeing safety signals” and that any adverse events were “rare and mild.” The whole point of using sophisticated algorithms to analyze VAERS is to find needles in the haystack — nonobvious potential harms that doctors and patients should be alerted to.

With the COVID-19 injections, we didn’t need sophisticated algorithms. The sheer volume of adverse event reports overwhelming VAERS was enough to trigger my oversight efforts. We faced impenetrable stonewalling until Secretary Kennedy’s commitment to radical transparency provided my Subcommittee with 11 million pages of documents. The documents make clear that FDA and CDC officials did not use an “err on the side of caution” standard to alert the public. Rather, they insisted on definitive proof of causation — a standard they knew would never be met.

They were far more concerned about not causing vaccine hesitancy than they were about informing the public of adverse events. They wanted to ensure that the injections would receive full licensure approval so that President Biden could mandate them to the military and millions of civilians, including healthy college students.

Perhaps the most egregious coercion involved healthy children who had virtually zero chance of serious harm from COVID-19. That coercion was based on another false claim that the injections would stop transmission. Some children were killed and others have been permanently disabled from the COVID-19 injections. Imagine being the parent who believed all the lies they were told and decided to have their now deceased or injured child injected.

Also in March 2021, Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), began leading a team of clinical researchers who were diagnosing and treating individuals with serious COVID-19 injection injuries. Twenty-three study participants were diagnosed and treated, then instructed to “not talk about the study” until the NIH could release its findings and conclusions. Dr. Nath maintained that early recognition and intervention were crucial for effective treatment. Yet no guidance was provided to physicians — one participant remarked that the NIH scientists had “taken the data and left us hanging.”

Adding insult to injury, in April 2021 the CDC published a report stating that similar adverse events were “anxiety” — not a problem with the shots. It was not until study participants began speaking publicly in 2022 that the NIH quietly posted its study on a preprint server that virtually no one read, leaving medical teams nationwide in the dark and the injection-injured left untreated.

We will never know the full extent of the harms (or the benefits) of the COVID-19 injections. But we do know that federal health officials were aware that serious harm was being done within months of them granting Emergency Use Authorization. We also know that those same officials turned a blind eye toward the safety signals that were screaming at them, but they refused to warn the public. The public pays federal health officials to evaluate drugs for safety and efficacy, and we have the right to be informed.

How many deaths and injuries could have been avoided had federal health officials simply done the job we paid them to do?

Currently, VAERS shows 1,676,100 cumulative worldwide adverse events and 39,099 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injection, with 9,332 (24%) of the deaths occurring within 2 days of injection. Most of these tragic adverse events occurred well after federal health officials should have informed the public about the risks they knew existed. Instead, they hid or downplayed those risks. As a result, millions were harmed after being denied their right to fully informed consent.

That’s why I consider this to be the biggest government scandal in my lifetime, and one that is crying out for full media attention and coverage.

The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA TODAY and Fox Digital have all declined or ignored requests to publish this op-ed.

NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN and MSNow have all refused to cover my report."

Originally published by Sen. Ron Johnson on X : https://x.com/SenRonJohnson/article/2067427189759332619

Watch Sen. Ron Johnson here: (video at the link: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...t-you-to-hear/)

Read the full report here: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/wp...2026-FINAL.pdf

[onawah]

FDA Altered Autopsy Results of Children Who Died After COVID Vaccines
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
June 22, 2026
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ovid-vaccines/

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here. Podcast at the link.)

"In November 2025, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research identified 10 child deaths related to the COVID-19 shots. In December 2025, the agency reduced the number to seven after revising at least two of the children’s autopsies, according to documents released last week by Sen. Ron Johnson.

The documents show that in November 2025, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) identified 10 child deaths related to the COVID-19 shots. But in December 2025, it reduced the number to seven and downgraded the probability that those deaths were connected to the children’s vaccination.

The Daily Caller, which first reported, quoted two former FDA officials and a forensic pathologist who performed two of the children’s autopsies. One of the FDA officials told the outlet the emails reveal “a coverup” by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Johnson included the documents in a letter sent last week to U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CDC Acting Director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Acting Commissioner Kyle Diamantas.

Even the reduced number of deaths was enough to trigger concern among some FDA scientists about the safety of the COVID-19 shots, Johnson’s letter stated.

“Although what drove the decision to change these three cases remains to be seen, what is clear is that these officials appear to have determined that the seven cases warranted warning about the risks,” Johnson wrote. These risks “should have raised serious concerns at HHS and CDC about the mRNA COVID-19 Injections.”

Even after the downgrade, the FDA’s Division of Pharmacovigilance recommended revising the label of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to include a warning about the risk of “myocarditis with fatal outcomes.”

The change was never made, for reasons that are not clear.

Myocarditis is widely associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and, with reports of deaths connected to the vaccines, particularly among teenage and young adult males.

Sen. Johnson: ‘The biggest government scandal’ of his lifetime

Johnson, who chairs the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is investigating a potential federal cover-up of COVID-19 vaccine risks.

In a post on X earlier this month, Johnson called the cover-up “way bigger than Watergate.” In a follow-up post, he called it “the biggest government scandal” of his lifetime.

https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/2067...id-vaccines%2F

Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
Thank you
@SenRonJohnson
for your relentless investigation of undisclosed vaccine risks and the official efforts of the Biden administration to conceal them from the public.
Quote
Senator Ron Johnson
@SenRonJohnson
Jun 17
The story the media — and the government — don't want you to hear
Read about the biggest government scandal that legacy newspapers won’t touch.
On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I held a hearing and released a...
9:01 PM · Jun 18, 2026
Article:https://x.com/SenRonJohnson/status/2067427189759332619

147.5K
Views

According to the Daily Caller, the children’s deaths occurred in 2021 and 2022, but were not revealed until 2025.

One of the unnamed FDA officials who spoke to the outlet said, “One wonders if there was internal pressure at the FDA during that time not to report these pediatric deaths in a timely manner.”

Attorney Greg Glaser said the FDA’s “maneuvering to obscure the true devastation of these vaccines is the definition of a fraudulent act” to protect Big Pharma.

Johnson is asking the CDC to provide him with all records relating to its decision to award Pfizer new contracts for its COVID-19 shots, and all CDC and FDA records about child deaths related to COVID-19 vaccination and any deliberations that occurred over whether to change the labels of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the number of child deaths linked to the COVID-19 shots is likely much higher, citing reports from the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). He said:

“VAERS reports (for U.S. only) show 84 child deaths (17 and under) from the COVID shot. We know that because of the gross underreporting of VAERS and the consistent efforts by the medical profession to mask vaccine deaths, 84 child deaths are only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to mortality associated with the COVID shot.

“In light of this, it seems ridiculous to quibble over the HHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] trying to reduce the number of deaths from 10 to 7. However, it belies the fact that when it comes to vaccines, the deep state within HHS, past and present, will lie through their teeth about a death or injury related to vaccines.”

Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., said the deaths are the outcome of a government cover-up of the “reckless” gain-of-function research “that caused COVID” and “killed 20 million and cost $25 trillion.”

HHS did not respond to The Defender’s request for comment by press time.

FDA officials who studied child deaths linked to COVID shots later ousted

The Daily Caller published a Dec. 5, 2025, email by Dr. Meghna Alimchandani, deputy director of the FDA Division of Pharmacovigilance, to then-CBER Director Vinay Prasad, informing him of the downgrade from 10 to seven deaths.

Of the seven deaths, two were deemed “probable” and five were classified as “possible.” Five of the seven deaths involved myocarditis, with two of those considered “probable” and three “possible.” That email also contained the recommendation to change the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine labels.

A week earlier, on Nov. 28, 2025, Prasad sent a memo to CBER staff informing them that he had evidence that “at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination.” In that memo, Prasad linked those children’s deaths to the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

“For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children. Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death,” Prasad wrote.

According to the Daily Caller, the memo leaked to the press “within hours,” resulting in “a media firestorm.” In her email to Prasad, Alimchandani wrote that the FDA’s review of the children’s deaths was a “MONUMENTAL effort … while being bombarded with media articles on the subject.”

Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., who at the time was acting director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and who was investigating VAERS reports of children who died after receiving a COVID-19 shot, noted that Prasad’s memo contained indications that a cover-up was underway. The memo stated:

“Dr. Hoeg organized a small meeting to discuss these deaths with OVRR [Office of Vaccines Research and Review] … stakeholders. The slides she presented, emails she sent, and distorted firsthand reports was shared with media outlets. The general narrative was that OVRR staff disagreed with Dr. Hoeg’s assessment that the deaths were due to vaccine receipt.

“Some staff present who leaked portrayed the incident as Dr. Hoeg attempting to create a false fear regarding vaccines.”

In April, Prasad resigned from the leadership of CBER — for the second time in less than a year. Last month, the FDA fired Høeg for unknown reasons. Her ouster came a week after Dr. Marty Makary resigned his FDA commissioner post following rumors that he would be fired.

Høeg had previously authored a report recommending that the number of diseases sccovered by the childhood vaccination schedule be reduced from 17 to 11.

Writing on Substack, Høeg questioned whether “any of these 10 cases have come to light if I had not given that presentation and Vinay had not asked for a ‘detailed analysis’ of the cases” or if Johnson “had not pursued getting the information.”

Claims children died due to parvovirus a ‘red herring’

The documents Johnson released show that two of the deaths were downgraded in part because of the presence of parvovirus B19 — a commonly occurring virus that causes mild symptoms in most people.

But in remarks shared with the Daily Caller, Dr. James Gill, a Yale School of Medicine pathologist who conducted the autopsies of two of the children who died postvaccination and published his findings in 2022, said the FDA and CDC’s parvovirus explanation is a “red herring.”

“Essentially, they could exclude about half of the potential complications because of this finding,” Gill said. He noted that parvovirus is found in the tissues of approximately half the population.

Gill said that while parvovirus infection can lead to heart problems, it would result in a different pattern of injury than what he observed in the two children. In his 2022 paper, Gill noted that the two children demonstrated symptoms of atypical myocarditis instead of “the alterations seen with typical myocarditis.”

Gill’s published study of the two cases “provoked an urgent rebuttal from the FDA and CDC,” the Daily Caller reported, citing documents the Epoch Times obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The FDA documents Johnson released confirmed that the cases were downgraded in part due to the presence of parvovirus.

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for CHD, said the CDC “muddied the waters” and “deliberately obscured” the evidence. Jablonowski referred to his analysis of the VAERS reports of two of the seven children listed in the documents Johnson released, noting that the FDA and CDC reached different conclusions.

One of the children, 16-year-old Micah Williamson, died a few days after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 shot. His death certificate attributed his death to “stress cardiomyopathy” related to his vaccination, and his VAERS report indicated myocarditis.

Yet, “The CDC claimed the presence of parvovirus B19 made the myocarditis of viral origins and not the vaccine,” Jablonowski said.

The FDA classified Williamson’s death as “possibly related to COVID-19 vaccination,” noting that “parvovirus B19 likely has long-term persistence in heart tissues and is frequently detected in heart tissues from autopsies of patients with no clinical or histopathologic evidence of myocarditis.”

Another of the children cited in Johnson’s documents, Jacob Clynick, died on June 16, 2021, three days after receiving his second Pfizer dose. His VAERS report referred to flu-like illness, but the report was later updated to include cardiac conditions including myocarditis, pericardial effusion and cardiomegaly.

This updated report was deleted in May 2025, Jablonowski said. Yet, “the CDC found a bacterial growth, and overstepping its purview, concluded that the death was attributable to C. septicum sepsis.”

The FDA overruled the CDC, finding that COVID-19 vaccination was the “probable” cause of Clynick’s death.

Jablonowski said Clynick received a vaccine from Pfizer lot number EW0217, “which consisted of 2,857,140 doses and resulted in 28 deaths reported to VAERS.”

“VAERS captures the smallest sliver of actual adverse events. Jacob and Micah represent the smallest sliver of actual adverse events from a time when every living generation jeopardized their heart health with an unsafe vaccine,” Jablonowski said.

Gill said he “tried to engage” the FDA in a dialogue, but “they shut it down.”

We must move immediately from investigation to indictment’

Experts said the cover-up warrants legal and regulatory action, especially in light of the FDA’s likely forthcoming approval of an mRNA flu vaccine and the liability shield COVID-19 vaccine makers continue to enjoy under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act).

“With the approval of the mRNA flu jab, the carnage will continue, and federal officials will ‘smile and wave’ as they knowingly send precious children to their demise,” Hooker said.

“We most definitely should be talking about subpoenas, arrests and prosecutions,” Ebright said. “We also most definitely should be talking about debarment and clawbacks of federal pensions and benefits.”

Glaser agreed. “We must move immediately from investigation to indictment. The era of polite ‘oversight hearings’ is over. We need the full force of subpoena power followed by grand jury proceedings.”

“There is no need to debate seven versus 10,” said former pharmaceutical research and development executive Sasha Latypova. “The mRNA shots killed hundreds and possibly thousands of children. … However, even seven acknowledged children’s deaths are sufficient to remove the product from the market immediately.” "

Related articles in The Defender

Leaked Memo: FDA Confirms ‘At Least’ 10 Child Deaths From COVID Vaccine, Promises Sweeping Reforms
CDC Awards Pfizer $1.24 Billion for COVID Vaccines for Kids and Adults
FDA Ousts Another Top Official: Who’s Behind the Shakeup — and Why?
Teens 5 Times More Likely to Develop Heart Conditions After mRNA COVID Vaccines
‘Stunning’ 620% Higher Risk of Myocarditis After mRNA COVID Vaccines
13-Year-Old Michigan Boy Dies 3 Days After Second Dose of Pfizer Vaccine, Aunt Says ‘Moral, Ethical, Health’ Questions Need Answers

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/catturd2/status/2070623446178889888?s=20

Catturd ™

Doctors who urged COVID shots need to face a hard truth: if serious safety concerns are valid, they helped promote them. 600K estimated deaths from the 💉 and boosters are still available...When medicine can't confront evidence, patients pay the price. Dr. Peter McCullough explains:

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/MrPool_QQ/status/2071301524618191056?s=20

Dave Collum reposted
Mr. Pool
@MrPool_QQ
·
Jun 28

🔻 VACCINE LOT NUMBERS JUST EXPOSED A PATTERN. AND IT'S NOT RANDOM.

**June 28, 2026. 07:42 AM.** Researchers cross-referenced 12,000 vaccine lot numbers with VAERS adverse event reports. What they found: specific batches had significantly higher adverse event correlations than others.

This isn't conspiracy. This is data.

**WHAT THE DATA SHOWS**

The correlation exists. That's documented.

Lot numbers ending in 20A-20F: minimal adverse events reported
Lot numbers ending in 21K-21X: elevated adverse events (myocarditis, blood clots, hospitalizations)
Lot numbers ending in 22R-22Z: highest adverse event concentrations

The pattern is real. The question is: WHY?

**THE HIDDEN INVESTIGATION**

I've been told by pharmaceutical industry contacts: The FDA knows about this pattern.

They've known for months.

But here's what they're NOT saying: The distribution of these lots wasn't random.

The high-adverse-event batches were disproportionately distributed to:
▪️ Military bases
▪️ First responder facilities
▪️ Rural communities
▪️ Specific demographic clusters

The low-adverse-event batches went to:
▪️ Government officials
▪️ Media figures
▪️ Pharmaceutical executives
▪️ Their families

**THE REAL QUESTION**

Was this manufacturing inconsistency? Or deliberate?

I've been told by pharmaceutical supply chain contacts: You don't get THREE DISTINCT TIERS by accident.

Either:
1. Quality control failed (unlikely)
2. Distribution was intentional (data suggests this)

**THE TIMELINE**

- **2021-2022:** Lots distributed
- **2023-2024:** Adverse event patterns emerged
- **2025:** FDA became aware
- **2026:** Data analysis complete
- **NOW:** Researchers releasing findings

**THE COVER-UP**

I've been told by contacts inside regulatory agencies: Multiple journals rejected peer review. Not because methodology was flawed. Because findings were "politically sensitive."

The researchers released it directly. The data is now public.

12,000 lot numbers. Every distribution point. Every adverse event correlation. Every hospital. Every state.

The FDA cannot memory-hole this. Data is distributed across networks.

This is why they're panicking.

**WHAT HAPPENS NEXT**

Congress will investigate. The distribution pattern is too specific to ignore.

If random manufacturing variance, distribution would be random. It wasn't.

If intentional, that's a different conversation.

Either way, the data demands answers.

VACCINE-LOT-PATTERN-0628
ADVERSE-EVENTS-CORRELATED
DISTRIBUTION-QUESTIONED

The lot numbers are the evidence. The distribution is the pattern. The adverse events are the outcome.

Someone you know got a different formula than they were told. Share this.

[Raskolnikov]

Here's an article by Dr. Margaret Aranda exposing what is called a "Teachable Moment," the practice of vaccinating patients without consent while under anesthesia. If you're anything like me, this has become a major concern ever since the bioweapon first came on the scene during covid. Here she describes the profitable practice taking place without the consent of the patient and then provides ways to protect yourself.

A "Teachable Moment" Under Anesthesia?

No Consent: How Hospitals Are Quietly Boosting Vaccine Rates with this "Untapped Health Care Opportunity", Even in Children



"You already know the system loves control.

And listen, I know you don’t ever want to use a hospital. But if you fall and break a hip or have a bone in your arm sticking out, you have no choice. If you have a heart attack in the grocery store, someone else can have 911 on the way, even without your knowledge.

With the I Do Not Consent Form™ in hand, so far, every single patient age 18+ has been protected from hospital protocols — but this article brings out another layer, one that is important to know as a behind-the-scenes look at the “teachable moment” to boost compliance, and what the Preop Nurses may say or think (without telling you).

You schedule surgery. You sign consents for the procedure, anesthesia, and known risks. You go under. And while you’re unconscious, some hospitals have protocols to jab you (or your child) with a vaccine — flu, COVID, or others — without your explicit, awake consent.

This isn’t conspiracy theory. It’s published medical practice.

The “Teachable Moment” They Don’t Tell You About

Hospitals and anesthesiologists openly discuss perioperative vaccination as a way to boost compliance. While you’re out cold for surgery, they administer the shot. Reasons given: convenience, higher uptake rates, and eliminating needle fear in kids.

Kaiser Permanente in Santa Clara offers flu shots to children under anesthesia for procedures like eye surgery or dental work. See HERE.

Children’s hospitals have implemented standardized processes, with dramatically increased vaccination rates. One program went from ~140 to over 2,000 flu shots per year..."

Much more excellent information in the article below. Due to complicated layout and formatting, I won't copy the rest of the article but wanted to include this:

How to Protect Yourself as a Rebel Patient

"Give legal notice. Sign and Notarize your I Do Not Consent Form™ (IDNCF™). Download, print, notarize for free at your bank, then deliver as instructed. NOTE: There is no consent/dissent document for children at this time.

Put into the record. The IDNCF™ comes with a cover letter that gives instructions to put it in your medical record. Your Preop Nurse should also ask you about Advance Directives and Medical Records. Have those ready and hand them a copy of your IDNCF™ at the same time.

Bring an advocate: Have a trusted person with you in pre-op who will reinforce your wishes, because the legal notice needs a backup human.

Ask direct questions: “Do you give any vaccines during this procedure? Under what conditions? Who makes that decision if I’m unconscious?”

Research the hospital: Call ahead. Ask for their perioperative vaccination policy.

Document everything: Record conversations (where legal).

Paper copies. Keep paper copies of all consents and dissents, which includes the standard hospital admission paperwork. Do not sign a blanket admission form, but even if you do, your IDNCF™ supercedes it."

https://therebelpatient.substack.com...ntId=278286020

[Raskolnikov]

BILL GATES’ MICRONEEDLE mRNA PATCH IS HERE

Meet the new “vaccine” that doesn’t just jab you — it permanently tattoos your body with modified mRNA AND quantum-dot QR codes.

One painless patch on your wrist (or wherever) dissolves, floods you with mRNA, and embeds scannable biotech markers that last years — possibly forever.

No phone needed.

No card.

No paper passport.

Just scan your skin at the store, airport, or restaurant and the system instantly knows your “vaccine status,” batch number, and compliance level.

This is the biological control grid planned for the next plandemic — a permanent digital prison under your skin.

They’re not hiding it anymore.

Your body is the barcode.

Resist.



https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots...utm_medium=web

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/207...021149920?s=20

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox

For several years now, embalmers in multiple countries have reported unusual white fibrous structures being found inside the deceased.

The reports began appearing after the COVID injection rollout. Yet despite the public concern, there has been little visible effort from major health authorities to explain what these structures are, how common they may be, or what they could mean for the living.

Now, two peer-reviewed papers have pushed the issue into a more serious category. One documented survey reports from embalmers across multiple countries. The other analyzed the material itself and reported evidence consistent with amyloid-like, misfolded protein structures using Raman spectroscopy and other testing methods.

The unsettling part is not only that these structures may exist. It is that the question has been sitting in plain view for years while the institutions with the power, funding, and equipment to investigate it have largely stayed silent.

For tonight's special report, we are joined by journalist Wayne Crouch, U.S. embalmer Richard Hirschman, Major Tom Haviland, and organic chemist Greg Harrison. Together, they bring a rare mix of frontline embalming observations, multi-year survey work, investigative persistence, and analytical chemistry to one of the strangest unresolved questions of the post-COVID era. 🧵

[onawah]

CDC Just Awarded Pfizer $1.2 Billion for COVID-19 Shots
by Amber Baker
Published July 15, 2026
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/...ovid-19-shots/

"U.S. federal procurement records published in June 2026 show that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) awarded Pfizer more than $1.24 billion in contracts for adult and pediatric mRNA COVID-19 shots for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The contracts, which were published on SAM.gov and contained more money allocated for pediatric COVID shots than adult COVID shots, were issued June 1, 2026 through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. Those contracts include a pediatric contract totaling $735,720,598 and an adult contract totaling $505,272,000.1 2

SAM.gov, which stands for System for Award Management, is the official U.S. government website managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) where entities register to bid on federal contracts, do business with the government, and search federal assistance listings.3

The pediatric contract exceeds the amount of the adult contract by more than $230 million, despite children being at significantly lower risk for complications from SARS-CoV-2 infections than adults.4 The procurement records provide no explanation or justification for the awards or why demand for pediatric mRNA COVID shots would warrant a significantly larger contract than one for adults.1 2

Pediatric Contract Exceeds Adult Contract by $230 Million Even Though SARS-CoV-2 Infections are Asymptomatic or Mild in Children
Public health officials and published research over the past several years have found that SARS-CoV-2 infections in most children are asymptomatic or mild. This is thought to be due to children having a faster, more robust early immune response which prevents the virus from progressing into severe infections seen in adults that may require hospitalization. Healthy children also do not suffer from chronic health problems like obesity or diabetes that make SARS-CoV-2 infections for adults more dangerous. Further, some research indicates that children have fewer viral receptors, such as ACE2, in their mucosal nasal tissues, making it harder for SARS-CoV-2 to latch on compared to adults, although researchers note this remains a hypothesis rather than a confirmed finding.5 6 7

Despite evidence of much milder or asymptomatic infections in children, the CDC recommended COVID shots for children in 2022 and then added them to the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule in early 2023 for infants as young as six months old.8

These recommendations were later changed in the fall of 2025 when the CDC applied “individual” or “shared” decision-making to adult and childhood vaccination schedules, among other updates, such as recommending toddlers receive the live virus varicella (chickenpox) vaccine as a standalone vaccination rather than in the combination live virus measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccination. The CDC states that “the combination vaccine doubles the risk of febrile seizures without conferring additional protection from varicella compared to standalone vaccination.”9

“Informed consent is back,” Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services Jim O’Neill said in response to the changes. O’Neill, also the acting Director of the CDC at the time, continued, “CDC’s 2022 blanket recommendation for perpetual COVID-19 boosters deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent. That changes today.” O’Neill further commended the doctors and public health experts of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for educating Americans about vaccine safety signals documented in manufacturer package inserts, published peer-reviewed research, and consumer self-reporting databases such as VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).9

Read the current 2025-2026 CDC recommendations for COVID shots here: https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/vaccin...-guidance.html

Blank Contract Descriptions and No Data on Quantities or Anticipated Demand, Effectiveness and Safety
Independent investigative reporter Jon Fleetwood raised several concerns about the transparency of the federal funds directed to Pfizer for mRNA COVID shots in a June 11, 2026 Substack post, noting that the procurement records included blank contract descriptions and offered “no explanation for the spending.” Fleetwood wrote that the filings provided no data on projected dose quantities, anticipated demand, effectiveness, or safety considerations to justify the $1.24 billion allocated toward COVID shot purchases for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, and separately stated that the pediatric contract exceeded the adult contract by more than $230 million despite children facing substantially lower risk from the virus.10

Fleetwood additionally flagged that the substantial $1.24 billion allocation comes as more Americans “increasingly reject COVID vaccines” and there is declining uptake among the general public as the “debate over the risk-benefit profile of repeated vaccination, particularly for healthy children” is not going away.10

Fleetwood said:

Only 9% of children are reported by the CDC to be up to date with the 2025─26 COVID-19 vaccine, emphasizing the low demand among the young demographic. Just 3.0% of parents say they even plan to vaccinate their child. The same report shows only 17% of adults received the 2025─26 COVID-19 vaccine.¹⁰

Poll: More Than Half of Voters Think COVID-19 Shots “May Have Killed Many People”
Rasmussen Reports, an electronic media company that conducts national tracking surveys on political, economic and lifestyle issues, reports that, according to a recent poll it conducted, more than half of voters think COVID-19 shots “may have killed many people.” The Rasmussen Reports polling report, which Fleetwood also included in his article, states, “The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 56% of anticipated U.S. voters consider it “Likely” that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 32% who believe it’s “Very Likely.” Thirty-five percent said it’s “Not Likely” there were significant deaths from COVID-19 vaccines, including 17% who think it’s “Not At All Likely.” These findings have changed little since September 2024.”11

In a post on his Focal Points Substack, epidemiologist Nicholas Hulsher commented on the $1.8 billion award to Pfizer. He wrote;

While demand has collapsed, CDC officials continue to lock in hundreds of millions of dollars in future purchases of the mRNA COVID shots for both infants and adults through its regular procurement channels. Our public health agencies are doubling down after getting caught covering-up 25 major safety signals — including sudden death. Instead of accountability, we are watching billions of dollars being funneled into the same gene-transfer products that have injured, disabled, or killed millions of innocent Americans.12

Health Secretary Kennedy Disputes Signficance of mRNA COVID Shot Contracts
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., commenting on the publicly available records, says the government has not completed the purchases for COVID shots. He wrote in a June 18 post on X:

The claim that CDC has already spent $1.24 billion on COVID-19 vaccines is simply wrong. HHS and CDC have not purchased COVID-19 vaccines for the upcoming respiratory season and have made no decisions regarding future purchases. IDIQ contracts allowing future orders are not the same as spending taxpayer dollars.13 "

References:1 SAM.gov. FY26-27 Adult Covid-19 Vaccines. June 3, 2026.
2 Ibid.
3 U.S. General Services Administration. About This Site. SAM.gov. July 8, 2026.
4 Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Why is COVID-19 less severe in children? A review of the proposed mechanisms underlying the age-related difference in severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2021; 106:429-439.
5 Goldman B. Research findings could explain why young kids rarely get very sick from COVID-19. Stanford Medicine News Center Oct. 12 2023.
6 University Hospitals. Why Do Children Tend to Fight off COVID-19 Better Than Adults? The Science of Health Apr. 13 2022.
7 Dioguardi M, Cazzolla AP, Arena F et al. Innate Immunity in Children and the Role of ACE2 Expression in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Pediatric Reports 2021; 13(3): 363-382.
8 Fole KE. CDC adds Covid-19 vaccinations to immunization schedules for children, adults. Politico Feb. 9, 2023.
9 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Immunization Schedule Adopts Individual-Based Decision-Making for COVID-19 and Standalone Vaccination for Chickenpox in Toddlers. CDC Newsroom Oct. 6 2025.
10 Fleetwood J. CDC Awards Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More COVID Vaccines: SAM.gov. June 11 2026.
11 Rasmussen Reports. 56% Suspect COVID-19 Vaccines Caused Deaths. Sept. 11 2025.
12 Hulscher N. CDC Awards Pfizer $1.24 Billion for Infant & Adult COVID-19 mRNA Injections. The Focal Points June 11, 2026.
13 Kennedy RF. Post on X. X June 18 2026.

[Squareinthecircle]

Here's a persuasive video on Substack about the celebrities that supported popular cooperation in contrast to the victims and their loss.

https://substack.com/@truelightessen...ction&r=2ld5cy

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status...833304078?s=20

Valerie Anne Smith
@ValerieAnne1970
·
2h
“I published a study proving that vaccinated children were 500% more ill… and then I got a call from my attorney saying that my licence was suspended”

Dr. Paul Thomas studied more than 3,000 children and proved that unvaccinated children were healthier than vaccinated children.

Here’s what his data showed for illnesses in the vaccinated:

Fever – 9.1X higher in vaccinated
Ear Pain – 3.4X higher
Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9X higher
Conjunctivitis – 2.4X higher
Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8X higher
Asthma – 5.2X higher
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9X higher
Sinusitis – 4.3X higher
Breathing Issues – 2.9X higher
Anemia – 5.5X higher
Eczema – 4.5X higher
Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1X higher
Dermatitis – 1.4X higher
Behavioral Issues – 4.1X higher
Gastroenteritis – 4.7X higher
Weight – 2.5X higher
ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group

[onawah]

Support the GRACE Act. Bring Religious Vaccine Exemptions Back to All 50 States!
July 29, 2026
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...all-50-states/

"Contact your federal lawmakers today and urge that they support the GRACE Act!
On July 23, Senator Mike Lee introduced the GRACE Act (Guaranteeing Religious Accommodation in Childhood Education Act), which would block federal funding of schools that refuse religious exemptions to vaccinations. The GRACE Act, co-sponsored by Senator Tommy Tuberville, was introduced in the House of Representatives in 2025 by Congressman Greg Steube.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 requires the federal government to deny funds to states or institutions where religious discrimination is occurring. By cutting federal education funds to states that deny citizens the right to a religious vaccine exemption, the GRACE Act ensures that states planning such actions will need to choose between honoring religious liberty or being denied federal funding.

The GRACE Act would also prevent schools from requiring documentation from students to justify receiving a religious exemption to vaccination.

According to Senator Lee, “Schools are discriminating against religious kids and targeting their families over vaccine exemptions. Keeping a kindergartner out of class over a vaccine is cruel – and it’s unconstitutional when the reason is their family’s religion.”

This is not only an issue of religious freedom, but also of parental rights and the right to an education. Children should not be barred from attending school because of their parents’ sincerely held religious beliefs.

Four states have eliminated the religious exemption and it’s being threatened in other state legislatures around the country.

Discrimination by denying religious vaccine exemptions is occurring in public, private and faith-based schools. It is also denying children the right to access extracurricular activities, special education services and summer camps.

The GRACE Act will not require any state to have a religious exemption, but it will cut federal education funding to any state that denies its citizens the right to a religious exemption to vaccination.

Why is the GRACE Act Needed?

States do not have the right to trample on religious liberty which is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
The GRACE Act is completely in line with federal law and the Constitution.
If it is passed into law, it would be unthinkable for the Supreme Court to overturn a law codifying the free exercise of religion.
Religious liberty is guaranteed at the federal level, setting a legal floor that all states must recognize.
Religious protection supersedes state health policy as a matter of law at the federal level and in all states.
States have the right to pass health laws as they see fit, but not in violation of religious protection.
There must be a balance between religious liberty and public health law, not a dominance of health law stomping out religious liberty.
There is significant momentum to end this form of discrimination and the time to act is now.

Contact your federal lawmakers today and urge that they support the GRACE Act!
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...all-50-states/
"

[mountain_jim]

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/jeffreytucker/status/2...462181979?s=20

Jeffrey A Tucker

@jeffreytucker

August 13, 2022: we cannot admit that the shots don't work because that would undermine our policy to force people to get them.


https://x.com/jeffreytucker/status/2...390461110?s=20

Jeffrey A Tucker

@jeffreytucker

CDC's Rochelle Walensky wanted to tell the truth on August 6, 2022, but the White House stopped it. For his part, Fauci just wanted to sell product, even if it was useless at best and probably dangerous.

Really unbelievable!


https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/20...691448573?s=20

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2

Oh Deborah. We have all the receipts You were as heartless and power hungry as Fauci. And you don’t have a pardon.

Quote
Ian Miller
@ianmSC

Deborah Birx admits that blue states went too far and didn’t follow science, keeping things closed because they wanted to hurt Donald Trump, which raises the question, why didn’t she tell them to stop? Or say anything publicly at the time?

[onawah]

Tell the IACC to Prioritize Vaccine Injury Research in Its Strategic Plan/TAKE ACTION:
Childrens Health Defense
8/3/26
team@childrenshealthdefense.org
advocacy@childrenshealthdefense.org

"Email your comments no later than August 20 to the IACC at this address: IACCPublicInquiries@mail.nih.gov
"On July 20, the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) released a working draft of its 2026–2028 strategic plan which provides recommendations to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding autism research, services, support, policies, and more.
The IACC’s next meeting was scheduled for July 31 but was postponed until August 27 to allow more time for public comment since the strategic plan was released just the previous week. The deadline for comments is August 20, 2026.
Parents of vaccine-injured children have long criticized the IACC’s research priorities for ignoring the vaccine/autism link. The widely-held hope within the medical freedom movement was that the current committee, convened by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., would take a decisive turn in its strategic plan by emphasizing the causative role vaccines play in the development of autism in many of those affected by the disorder.
However, there is currently no mention of vaccines anywhere in the 336-page document.
Approximately 50% of parents of children with autism believe their children were injured by vaccines. Clearly, this is a topic worth the IACC’s time to consider in making its recommendations. We have until August 20 to convince the committee to do so.
In addition to telling your personal story, let the committee members know why it’s crucial to address vaccines in the strategic plan.
Here are some points to consider in writing your comment:
Skyrocketing rates of neurological disorders including autism in recent decades are in lockstep with increasing vaccines added to the routine childhood schedule.
Vaccinated children have at least a 170% higher chance of being diagnosed with autism compared to unvaccinated children.
Over 250 scientific studies indicate multiple associations between vaccines and autism.
Government health agencies have never conducted the most obvious studies that would confirm or refute links between vaccines and autism: wide-scale comparisons of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
Numerous small-scale vaccinated/unvaccinated studies confirm a link between vaccines and an array of negative health outcomes including autism.
The package insert for Sanofi Pasteur’s Tripedia DTaP vaccine listed autism (as well as SIDS, encephalopathy, and convulsion among others) as a potential adverse event.
Let the IACC know that it’s time to acknowledge the elephant in the room so that the vaccine/autism link can finally get the attention it deserves from our government health agencies.
Email your comments no later than August 20 to the IACC at this address:
IACCPublicInquiries@mail.nih.gov
...and please share this alert with friends and family to increase our impact.
Thank you for taking action!
The Children’s Health Defense Team "

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/Q_TheStormRider/status...533968515?s=20

Q The Storm Rider
@Q_TheStormRider

🚨🚨Senator Ron Johnson says CNN canceled his interview yesterday after he told them he planned to discuss internal documents showing public health officials covered up COVID vaccine harm.

“Not one major network has covered this story.”

“I was just invited to be on CNN yesterday.”

“I told them what I would talk about, they canceled the interview.”

STAY CONNECTED, NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/jsolomonReports/status...236302716?s=20

Return of the rubber stamp? First mRNA flu vaccine has far higher injury rate than standard jabs

Moderna's own research shows 5,000 novel jabs required to prevent one hospitalization over standard vaccine. "Pharma finished recapturing" FDA after exit of officials with higher standards, drug industry journalist says.

The Senate Permanent Committee on Investigations exposed COVID-19 vaccine injuries long "masked" in government surveillance databases, allegedly at the behest of the Biden administration. Thanks to the Trump administration's drug regulators, the panel led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has a new opportunity to investigate vaccine safety.

Moderna announced late Wednesday that the Food and Drug Administration approved its mRNA flu vaccine, the first ever, despite the drugmaker purportedly refusing to test it against a placebo and its own research finding little benefit over a standard licensed flu shot and a worse safety profile. One pharmacologist called the results "not breathtaking."

< more at link >


dded

https://x.com/jsolomonReports/status...460151325?s=20

John Solomon
@jsolomonReports

It takes 5,000 jabs of Moderna's just-approved mRNA flu vaccine to prevent one more hospitalization compared to a standard flu vaccine, but the new shot causes six times more injuries.

@alexberenson first flagged the disparity.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Let us never forget that the covid vax did have a safety data sheet insert - because all drugs must have one if licensed for public use.

IT WAS BLANK!

IT WAS BLANK!

IT WAS BLANK!

[Satori]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
Let us never forget that the covid vax did have a safety data sheet insert - because all drugs must have one if licensed for public use.

IT WAS BLANK!

IT WAS BLANK!

IT WAS BLANK!

The cover story for why the safety data sheet was blank (and yes it was blank) is because the poison jab (that was released on an unsuspecting and trusting global population because of the pandemic (sic)) created an "emergency". Under the fake emergency the kill shots were given emergency use authorization (EUA), not approval.

Among other things, the fraudulent legal fiction of EUA exempted the jab from the requirement of providing a safety data sheet. (Not that it would have mattered to the intended outcomes if they had included it.) That requirement applies to approved/licensed products. Nifty slight-of-hand legal fiction to cover up, to some extent, criminal conduct.