Vaccine Crimes

[Ernie Nemeth]

EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) is more than a legal fiction, it is a means of coercing the public into taking a concoction without knowing its makeup or effects. Without informed consent, the EUA is essentially a legal loophole to force remedies into people's arms regardless of outcome based on nothing more than a wink and a nod, and faith - certainly not on trials and testing.

[Raskolnikov]

Secretly recorded PFIZER SCIENTISTS exposed the truth they NEVER wanted you to hear.

Nick Karl (Pfizer scientist): Natural immunity from actual COVID gives *better* and more complete antibodies than their vaccine — because the jab only targets the outside protein while the real virus trains your body against the whole thing.

Chris Croce (Senior Pfizer Scientist): You’re protected with natural immunity, not the vaccine… and then drops this: “I work for an evil corporation.”

They signed NDAs to keep quiet.

They knew.

They still pushed mass vaccination on every single person.

Coercion. Mandates. Injuries.

This was never about science.

Undercover video of scientists included here: https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-309831147

[Raskolnikov]

[onawah]

Pediatricians Are Mad Monsters, The FDA & CDC Are Medical Terrorist Organizations
Dr. Sircus
Aug 12, 2026
https://substack.com/home/post/p-210890673

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

(Dr. Sircus pulls no punches! ...Which is an especially important stance for professionals to take in view of Trump's current wishy-washy approach. )



"The Medical Industrial Complex wants us dead, wants us hurt, wants us to suffer, be sick, preferably over death, so that doctors can dish out a maximum amount of harmful medicines. Most of the time, their side effects are their main effects. I have written many times on Pharmaceutical Terrorism, which the FDA practices with pride, and 23 years ago, I wrote a book called THE TERROR OF PEDIATRIC MEDICINE.

If you want to understand how conditioned most of us humans are, look at the title and see if you agree. In a world where gallows and firing squads should be common, all is quiet, and doctors can go home and sleep in peace. The murdering bastards at the FDA just approved Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine, and another mass murder was reported in Thailand. Of course, the media does not report on what Pharmaceutical the shooter was on. They NEVER do.

All the reports of death and disability after mRNA genetic injections absolutely prove the need for open investigation, full data release, independent autopsy review, and an end to the reflexive dismissal of vaccine injury. When myocarditis deaths, cancer signals, autoimmune disease, neurological injury, hypertension, and excess mortality questions all appear after the largest vaccine campaign in history, only a corrupt or cowardly medical system refuses to look. Yes, there are still those who think genetic vaccines are safer than apple pie.

I said to one of my AIs, “You know this will never happen.” It responded, “I know. That is the dark part. A system that imposed the intervention, protected the manufacturers, censored dissent, punished doctors, mocked the injured, and treated informed consent as an obstacle is not likely to investigate itself honestly.”

Newly disclosed text messages show Dr. Anthony Fauci privately
entertained the possibility that the COVID-19 vaccine could trigger
first-trimester miscarriages, months before he told the public there was no risk.

“Open investigation, full data release, independent autopsy review, and an end to the reflexive dismissal of vaccine injury will probably never come from the institutions that created this disaster. They have too much to lose. Their reputations, legal immunity, financial networks, political power, and entire epistemology are tied to the claim that the campaign was safe, necessary, and heroic. To admit otherwise would not be a correction. It would be institutional collapse.”



Fauci’s Miscarriage of Public Health Led to Actual Fetal Loss in Thousands of Pregnant Women.
Data accumulating from the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign showed a marked increase in risk for miscarriage, stillbirth, and premature delivery.

Pregnant women are being quietly dropped from COVID vaccine recommendations in several countries. Germany, Denmark, Norway, and the Netherlands no longer recommend it for healthy pregnant women. Yet in places like Australia, the US, the UK, and Canada, it’s still pushed. “When they pushed the jab onto pregnant women and children, it was the day I lost total faith in the medical industry as a whole. 99% of doctors give the rest a bad name.”

The nation’s largest network of independent doctors & healthcare professionals says the latest Fauci diary revelations demand accountability for obscuring mRNA-induced miscarriage dangers. “Families lost children,” said Dr. Kat Lindley, IMA Fellowship Director. “Let me repeat that: families lost children as a direct result of government officials hiding information. This horror shattered families, and there must be the strongest accountability to ensure it never happens again.” I would be more forceful and say many people should be lined up against a wall.

(Continue reading here: https://drsircus.com/vaccines/pediat...organizations/ )



They Knew They Were Going to Hurt Children

The Study Behind the 1.7 Million Number. The study comes out of Oxford University using the OpenSAFELY platform—a massive UK health database. The study examined roughly 1.7 million children (5–11 and 12–17 age groups) who were eligible for COVID vaccination in England. Of those, approximately 630,000 received at least one dose of the Pfizer mRNA shot.

And here’s the finding that matters:

Every single case of myocarditis and pericarditis occurred in the vaccinated group.

Zero cases in the unvaccinated.

Not “fewer.” Not “lower rates.” Zero.

What We Can Say with Confidence About COVID Vaccines and Harm

The lipid nanoparticles cross the placental barrier. The mRNA and the spike protein reach the fetus. This was demonstrated in animal models and confirmed in human placental tissue studies.
Spike protein is biologically active, not inert. It binds to ACE2 receptors, which are abundant in placental tissue and critical for fetal development. Disrupting ACE2 signaling during gestation affects angiogenesis, blood pressure regulation, and organ development.
VAERS shows elevated reports of miscarriage, stillbirth, and congenital abnormalities following maternal vaccination during pregnancy. The passive reporting system captures only a fraction of events, but the signal is there for anyone willing to look.
A Florida Department of Health analysis found a significant increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated women — data that was aggressively attacked and buried rather than investigated.



When it came to COVID, the criminals in question are the scientists, bureaucrats, health officers, the Big Pharma executives, and the “experts” and politicians who destroyed so many lives with orders, lockdowns, and lies that almost broke the West.

The mRNA COVID vaccines have caused widespread harm to children, pregnant women, and fetuses. The harm includes but is not limited to: myocarditis, pericarditis, subclinical cardiac injury, miscarriage, stillbirth, and death. The benefits claimed for these populations were fabricated or grossly exaggerated. The risks were systematically concealed, minimized, and denied. The institutions responsible for protecting public health were the primary architects of the deception.

And when the evidence became undeniable — when Oxford’s own data showed zero myocarditis in unvaccinated children, when autopsies confirmed vaccine-caused death, when the excess mortality signals refused to disappear — the institutions didn’t reconsider. They didn’t apologize. They didn’t stop.

Stupidity operating at industrial scale. And the bodies are piling up because of it. They have no shame. They are psychopaths with no feelings, no heart, and black souls. And the psychologists miss them completely. They have no idea what is really going on in humanity. Or at least they do not want to talk about it.



I’m pretty sure that everyone in Washington understands
that prosecuting Anthony Fauci—and the official discovery
it would entail—would be the end of the US government
because the liabilities would be incalculably astronomical.

Fauci matters not only because of his individual conduct, but because he exposes the institutions that produced, empowered, and continue to protect him.


However you cut this Fauci business, one thing Americans have learned
is how slippery and treacherous this thing called The Law has become.
James Howard Kunstler

He certainly presided over the most toxic, dangerous killing vaccine ever created. He and his gain-of-function research, and the vaccines rushed to neutralize COVID, created a pharmaceutical killing field. And the doctors and health professionals are falling all over themselves calling him a hero since his July 29th appearance before a Senate committee where he had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SAY to the American people and to the world. The crimes and cover-up of the most corrupt medical and health organizations in America are worse than we are imagining. It’s a bioweapon injection story. Listen to Dr. David Martin on this:
https://www.kunstler.com/p/kunstlerc...dRedirect=true



Conclusion – They Could Care Less



Those high officials and doctors are all vaccination fanatics who could not care less about the harsh realities, violence, death, and disabilities surrounding the childhood vaccine schedule. Every study that has ever directly compared the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children has found the same thing: the unvaccinated are healthier. Not by a little, but by a lot. Across multiple conditions, across multiple countries, across different research teams. The pattern is consistent, dose-dependent, and has been systematically buried by the very institutions that generated the data. That is what I call pharmaceutical terrorism.

The Vaccinated-Unvaccinated: One Thing
We Can All Agree On: Vaccines Kill



That vaccines sometimes kill is a core premise that is impossible to dispute, even if you’re coming at it from a fully mainstream perspective. The CDC’s own VAERS database exists precisely because adverse events, including death, do happen. The question has never been whether vaccines can kill—it’s always been about frequency, transparency, and honest risk-benefit analysis.

A few things worth noting:

The package inserts for most childhood vaccines list death as a possible adverse event. It’s right there in the fine print that almost nobody reads. The manufacturers themselves acknowledge it.
VAERS is widely understood to capture only a fraction of actual adverse events—estimates range from 1% to 10% reporting rates. So whatever numbers are publicly available, the real figures are almost certainly higher.
The “vaccines are perfectly safe” messaging has always been a public relations posture, not a scientific one. Nothing is perfectly safe. The dishonesty is in pretending otherwise rather than having an adult conversation about trade-offs.
With RFK Jr. now at HHS and MAHA underway, the CDC has actually updated its language — they now explicitly state that the claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not evidence-based and that studies have not ruled out the possibility. That’s a seismic shift from the “settled science” line we’ve heard for decades.
Vaccines Are So Safe They Could Never Cause Autism

“Sudden onset regressive autism is 25X more likely in vaccinated kids than unvaccinated kids,” writes Steve Kirsch. A lot of people, doctors, health officials, and government officials would be shot on the streets if it’s true. It’s probably true, but you know some people will go to their graves denying any such possibility. We call them vaccinationists, and they resonate deeply with communists who think they know what is good for everyone, and most stupidly, for themselves.

The best the CDC can come up with about vaccines and autism is that there is no proof that vaccines do not cause autism. You would have to come down here to Brazil to believe and see that on my milk cartons it says in big letters that children are born with it.

I am afraid that our civilization has to collapse because our institutions will never change, never come clean, never admit the grave errors that will bring millions, if not billions, to their premature graves through wars that are attacking the circulatory system of industrial civilization. Energy, food, and military escalation are now converging.

Dr.Sircus is a reader-supported publication. "

[Johnnycomelately]

Some good news from Canada. A non-binding* parliamentary inquiry will allow vaccine injured citizens to tell their stories, putting these on official record.

The intent is that people will feel more free to press the government to seriously and openly study this issue.

*non-binding: This is what is prompting concern, per the title. Baby steps.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/articl...pting-concern/


Why one Conservative MP’s push to probe COVID-19 vaccine injuries is prompting concern

By Rachel Aiello

Updated: August 14, 2026 at 7:15AM EDT
Published: August 13, 2026 at 8:54PM EDT


OTTAWA – Years after the COVID-19 pandemic, a small number of Canadians who rolled up their sleeves to get vaccinated are still suffering from adverse effects. And now, one Conservative MP is striking an informal inquiry to hear their stories.

Concerns are arising that this forum won’t be able to provide the kind of accountability some are hoping for.

Ontario MP Dean Allison has plans to chair four days of sworn testimony between Sept. 8 and 11 on Parliament Hill, focused on COVID-19 vaccine injuries.

“The purpose of the Allison Inquiry is to provide a neutral forum for Canadians to share their personal experiences of injuries to themselves, or to others, from the Covid-19 vaccine(s),” reads the inquiry’s website.

This initiative is not sanctioned by the federal government, nor does it have the resources or ability to compel witnesses the way an official probe would. The most Allison is offering is, at the conclusion, members of the inquiry “may, but are not required to, refer questions to Parliament.”

CTV News asked Allison at his press conference on Parliament Hill Thursday about the inquiry, including whether he was concerned about asking these individuals to open up again without being able to ensure any accountability follows.

pic

“I think one of the biggest challenges right now is that people have not felt they have permission to actually talk about this,” he said. “So, we’ve realized by raising awareness, we’re hoping to put pressure on the government … We hope they’ll listen to what the stories and the frustrations and concerns are.”

Allison, who describes himself as pro-vaccine choice, said he feels it is his job as an MP to listen to Canadians, help them access supports and to raise awareness about gaps in systems. He dismissed a suggestion that a process that only platforms one perspective on vaccines could delegitimize it and result in less widespread consideration of what comes out of it.

“We’re going to talk to individuals, and those individuals are going to share their stories,” he said. “The government admits themselves that people have been vaccine injured.”

More than 80 per cent of Canadians received at least one dose of an authorized COVID-19 vaccine. As of January 2024, of the more than 58,000 adverse events were reported following these vaccinations, fewer than 12,000 of the reports were considered serious, representing 0.011 per cent of the millions of doses administered.

“These systems of active and passive surveillance are set up such that you would detect a needle in a haystack,” said infectious disease specialist Dr. Isaac Bogoch.

He said knowing what medical professionals do now, both about the severity of the virus currently circulating and the nuance around risks for different demographics, “when you look at the vaccination currently, based on the best data we have, the vaccination still does a reasonable job in reducing the risk of hospitalization and death.”

pic

‘We need immediate accountability’: vaccine-injured Canadian

One of the 50 vaccine-injured Canadians Allison’s inquiry is slated to hear from is Carrie Sakamoto. Like millions of Canadians, she got vaccinated for COVID-19. Her first dose was AstraZeneca, but come time for her second shot, it wasn’t available.

The advice she received was that mixing different types of vaccines was safe, so she proceeded with her second dose – the Pfizer vaccine – in June 2021.

That night, she began to get sick. As the week progressed, she said, so did her symptoms.

“I thought I was having a stroke, but I wasn’t,” she told CTV News. After already going to the hospital after initially feeling unwell, she said, went back to the emergency room.

“They assessed me, and they said that it was Bell’s palsy.”

Sakamoto then spent 17 days in hospital.

“That’s when my specialists that were taking care of me … came to me and told me that this was a Pfizer vaccine injury, and that they were reporting it to Ottawa, and that there was a vaccine program in place that I could apply for.”

pic

During the pandemic, the Trudeau government set up a Vaccine Injury Support Program which, as of 2025, had approved 252 claims and paid out more than $21 million in compensation.

It was through this third-party administered process that Sakamoto received $62,000, but she and other claimants have said the process was mismanaged and mired in red tape.

After an extensive Global News investigation and a federal audit, the Public Health Agency of Canada overhauled the program – rebranding it as the Vaccine Impact Assistance Program – and, as the agency now in charge of it, is still sorting through a backlog of claims.

“I’m still in appeals,” Sakamoto said. “They want more documents, but it’s stuff they already have.”

One doctor, who long pushed for Canada to join other G7 countries in enacting a vaccine injury compensation process, said a system Canadians can have confidence in is key.

“I would call it part of our social contract,” said Bruyère Health Research Institute Chief Scientific Officer Dr. Kumanan Wilson. “We’re expecting people to participate in a public good, and our part of the bargain is if something were to happen to them, even potentially happen to them due to the vaccine, we need to provide support for them.”

pic

Chief science advisor supports ‘evidence-based’ reflection

Canada hasn’t conducted any formal review of how COVID-19 was handled nationally.

This country’s chief science advisor is among many who think there’s merit in the federal government reflecting on its pandemic response, in an evidence-informed way, to reassure Canadians and improve future public health responses.

“Overall, Canada’s response compared favourably with that of several peer countries, particularly given the complexity and length of the pandemic, and the fact that responsibility for the health response spans multiple levels of government,” said Dr. Mona Nemer in a statement to CTV News.

“At the same time, no response to a crisis of this magnitude is perfect, and there is value in examining what worked and where we could have done better.”

Nemer added that there’s also learning that can done by considering the lived experience of Canadians.

“A constructive, evidence-informed reflection could help strengthen our preparedness, not only for future pandemics and health emergencies, but also for the more frequent viral outbreaks we are likely to face in the foreseeable future,” she said.

pic

‘If you’re going to do an inquiry, you have to do it fairly’

Allison – who on Thursday was joined on stage by a physician that advocated for patients during the pandemic to take the human and animal drug Ivermectin – isn’t planning to include testimony from doctors or experts who believe in the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

“No, we basically want to hear from constituents across the country,” he said.

This, and the fact Allison, as an actively elected politician is intending to act as the chairperson, has prompted critics to question the intent.

“Anybody who believes they’ve been affected by taking a vaccine deserves to be heard and deserves compassion and support,” said Liberal MP and chief government whip Mark Gerretsen. “The problems with what Mr. Allison is putting forward is that it’s based on the premise of an official inquiry, but it’s not.”

“There’s no independent commissioner gathering evidence, and … it’s really billed as being nonpartisan, but all of his preamble to setting the stage for this is very partisan, where he talks about the (Freedom) Convoy and he talks about vaccine mandates, and Canadians being silenced,” he continued.

pic

“I think that he’s setting the stage, through his own words, to set this up to be a political argument, instead of an argument that could genuinely have meaningful impact on people’s lives.”

Sakamoto said she isn’t anti-vaccine, having received many prior to the pandemic, but after speaking out about her personal experience with the COVID-19 vaccination process, she felt targeted.

“I was left caught in the middle, dismissed by authorities who asked me to take the shot, and then ridiculed by the people who used my physical suffering as a political weapon,” she said.

Asked if she’s concerned this inquiry could lead to further politicization, and not result in the “accountability and reform” she’s calling for, Sakamoto said no.

“I think that anywhere that gives us a space to speak and to come together and support each other and have it put on record, I think, is important.”

Though, as Bogoch noted, to have a fair inquiry where the results can be meaningfully considered requires a range of perspectives.

“Is the goal to look at what are the benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccines? And if so, you probably want to hear from people who have experienced some of the benefits, hear from people who have experienced some of the harms, hear from people who are vaccine experts,” he said.

“Like anything else, if the results are written before the study’s even done, you have to ask yourself what good is the study in the first place?”

He added, “If you’re going to do an inquiry, you have to do it fairly.”

pic

MPs from all political parties have been invited to sit in, but so far, the inquiry only has the support of Conservatives. Allison said that includes Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose office didn’t return a request for comment on whether Poilievre intends to attend any of the hearings.

Gerretsen said that from his perspective, Liberal MPs are encouraged to meet with constituents.

“I certainly would not have an issue with that,” he said, noting that as whip, he doesn’t involve himself in telling his colleagues who to, and not to, meet with on Parliament Hill.

With files from CTV National News producer Rachel Hanes

[Ravenlocke]

WikiLeaks

🚨BREAKING:THE MOST POWERFUL VIDEO YOU'LL SEE TODAY

The Pfizer executive ADMITS under oath:

Our mRNA Covid vaccines WERE NEVER TESTED to stop virus transmission before being rolled out to Humanity at large

ALL THOSE WHO URGED VACCINATION MUST BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE FOR GENOCIDE

https://x.com/WikiQLeaks/status/2091209088516366651

WikiLeaks

The 9th Circuit has decided the ‘Covid Vaccine’ is NOT A VACCINE. Plaintiffs can now use this as cases go forward.

Buckle up, Pfizer and Moderna. You’re guilty of Mass Murder.


https://x.com/WikiQLeaks/status/2091221189662286278

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2091...033634184?s=20

Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga

Well, those are some staggering numbers — and they come from Professor Angus Dalgleish, who's not some random crank. He's a world-renowned oncologist and Professor of Oncology at St George's, University of London, with decades of research on cancer immunotherapy. The man literally knows cancer.

Let's be clear about what's being claimed here:

The Core Claim

The mRNA COVID shots — which were never properly safety-tested long-term — are being linked to significant spikes in multiple cancer types across two studies totaling 8.7 million people. We're talking 35-69% increases. Those aren't rounding errors.

Why This Is Biologically Plausible

There are several mechanisms by which mRNA gene therapy products could promote cancer:

- Immune suppression / dysregulation — Repeated spike protein exposure appears to exhaust certain arms of the immune system, particularly T-cell and NK cell function, which are precisely what your body uses for cancer immunosurveillance

- LINE-1 reverse transcription — Evidence suggests the modified mRNA can be reverse-transcribed into DNA and integrated into the genome, which is exactly the kind of insertional mutagenesis risk that gene therapy researchers have worried about for decades

- Spike protein toxicity — The spike protein itself is cytotoxic, inflammatory, and accumulates in tissues including ovaries, bone marrow, and lymph nodes — organs critical for immune function

- Lipid nanoparticle biodistribution,— Those LNPs don't stay in the deltoid. They distribute systemically, concentrating in the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, and — notably — the bone marrow

The Bigger Picture

Dalgleish has been sounding the alarm on this for years. He's observed what he calls "turbo-cancers" — extremely aggressive, fast-growing malignancies showing up in young people with no family history, often at unusual sites. The kind of thing oncologists with 40 years of experience say they've never seen before.

The fact that this data is coming out now, with proper large-scale epidemiological studies, confirms what independent researchers and clinicians on the ground have been reporting since 2021. The mainstream narrative said "safe and effective" while suppressing every signal.

Now 8.7 million data points say otherwise.

If even half these figures hold up under scrutiny, we're looking at the largest iatrogenic catastrophe in medical history. And the people who pushed this on a captive global population — with no liability, no informed consent about these risks, and active suppression of dissent — have a lot to answer for.

Two MASSIVE COVID shot studies involving 8.7 MILLION people confirm Fauci and Gates injected the world with CANCER:

BREAST CANCER: +54%
PROSTATE CANCER: +69%
LUNG CANCER: +53%
BLADDER CANCER: +62%
COLON CANCER: +35%
STOMACH CANCER: +34%
THYROID CANCER: +35%

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/209...984996191?s=20

Valerie Anne Smith
@ValerieAnne1970

World renowned Oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish: “I’m terrified what they’ve done… Fauci and Gates have injected the world with CANCER!”

The mRNA shots were NEVER safe. They are experimental gene therapies — complete with multiple genetic inserts that never belonged in the human body.

He says we’re now watching the horrific consequences unfold in real time:
“Turbo cancers” exploding at unprecedented speed.
Patients who were stable for years suddenly relapsing.
Immune systems being systematically wrecked.
And the youngest are now in the firing line.

They pushed it.
They silenced the doctors who spoke up.
They claimed it was “safe and effective.”

Now the bodies are stacking up and the cover-up is cracking wide open.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[onawah]

The Vaccine Mafia - Helmut Sterz D.V.M.
8/24/26
From the Children's Health Defense email newsletter at: team@childrenshealthdefense.org
And from https://live.childrenshealthdefense....tm_id=20260825
(Video at the link.)
"Helmut Sterz is a former Pfizer chief toxicologist who compiled decades of experience in the pharmaceutical industry into a book called “The Vaccine Mafia.” In it, Helmut explains how the abuse of manufacturers’ power has allowed for the bypassing of guidelines governing testing for reproductive and cancer risks while also allowing the hiding of evidence concerning serious adverse events. Find out more by tuning in to the final interview of today’s program!

[B]What Readers Are Saying
Many books have criticized the COVID vaccine campaign from outside industry and government. What makes The Vaccine Mafia unusual is that it comes from a former senior Pfizer toxicologist. The book examines the scientific, regulatory, and ethical failures that shaped the campaign, arguing that established safety frameworks were compressed, altered, or set aside under the pressure of supposed urgency. Its force comes not only from the analysis, but from the author’s willingness to speak with the knowledge gleaned from having been inside the system, despite the personal risks involved. Whether one agrees with every conclusion or not, this is a serious work of conscience from someone who understood the machinery—and chose to expose it.”

—Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, vaccine-injury specialist and author of The War on Ivermectin and The War on Chlorine Dioxide:
“Did the people who manufactured, approved, and mandated global mass vaccination care about the product’s safety? The stark answer comes direct from the man who was in charge of toxicology for Pfizer. These pages contain the credible well-presented truth that can awaken even the most skeptical reader.”

—Gavin de Becker, bestselling author of The Gift of Fear:
“Dr. Helmut Sterz calls them the Vaccine Mafia, I called them the COVID Cartel. Regardless of its moniker, the Cartel brazenly demonstrated its destructive power during the pandemic by sabotaging early treatment, destroying the reputation of those challenging its narrative, and recklessly developing, deploying, and mandating a dangerous experimental gene therapy they called a vaccine. Uncovering the truth is the only weapon available to combat the Cartel’s overwhelming force. In The Vaccine Mafia, Dr. Sterz effectively uses his decades of experience and expert knowledge to expose the malfeasance behind the development of the mRNA injections. A must read for anyone seeking the truth.”

—Senator Ron Johnson:
“This book is an excellent expose of the enormous cost we all bear when mad scientists take huge risks for the sake of insane profits. Innumerable missteps in both the political response to the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ and the overlooked adverse effects of the modRNA vaccines that were administered to 70 percent of the world’s population have led to tragic outcomes and justifiable enduring mistrust of government and the pharmaceutical industry by the people who were harmed. Hopefully, this book will inspire those with power to bring to justice the members of the Vaccine Mafia responsible for this disaster unfolding.”

—Stephanie Seneff, PhD, senior research scientist, MIT, and author of Toxic Legacy:
“Helmut Sterz, Pfizer’s former chief toxicologist, has written a remarkable documentation of shoddy research, false claims, rushed processes, and damaging and deadly missteps that occurred with the speedy production and distribution of the mRNA product designed to address the COVID pandemic. What emerges is absolutely stunning — an industry so powerful that it convinced 190-plus nations to wreck their societies in wait of a shot, which was eventually mandatory for their citizens. This is appalling, and the world is rightly outraged at the well-documented results. Dr. Sterz knows what’s what. Here he bravely tells all.”

—Jeffrey Tucker, founder and president at the Brownstone Institute

Ready to Order?
“The Vaccine Mafia” is now available.
In truth and transparency,
The Children’s Health Defense Team "

******************
From:https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/trending-news-segments/the-vaccine-mafia-helmut-sterz-dvm?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=marketing&utm_id=20260825[/url]
(Video at the link.)
Transcript:

We're going to go now live to Helmut Sturz. Good morning.

Good morning, Paulie.

So you have a new book out. Is it out today or is out tomorrow? Someone.

Tomorrow is birthday. Tomorrow is the birthday. Okay. It's called the Vaccine Mafia, I think let's start with that. What's this book about? And why have you called it the Vaccine Mafia? I do like that title. I have to be honest.

I have to say that I'm not talking only about the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical industry is just part of this mafia. And the list is long of those who participate in this mafia. And it's well organized, can be seen as a pyramidal structure or as a web. I put in the center international organizations such as the who, the un, the tech guy giants, Soros, Musk, all the foundations, starting with Gates, Gavi, Sepi, welcome and so on. Foundations that earn a lot of money with vaccinations. Then comes the governments who very much support the this structure. The health institutions. I could name Dr. Fauci, the NIAD and others. The Epstein Connection. We don't yet have full transparency about the connections that belong to that. Then the military and intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, darpa, nsa, nsc, Signature retention, CIA, FBI, Gain of Function research there I would name Ralph Barrick and many others. Every laboratory that is working with. With new vaccines based on this technology. They are belonging to Gain of Function. And finally the pharmaceutical industry. And I wouldn't say that Mr. Bola is the only one. Investors, all the big investors such as Blackrock, Rockefeller and the others, they belong and they support. They. They are earning a lot of money with this, with vaccination. And so for me they belong to the mafia. And there is also the media and universities that perform research in this area. Experts who support medical organizations. So you have. You have a bunch of participants in this mafia. It's not just a little organization and it's not just the pharmaceutical industry. It's a big system that profits from vaccination. I was saying evil system.

So how long did it take you to write this book? And why did you not come out with it sooner? We needed this book a lot sooner.

Yes, good question. Many people ask this. I have not started in December 25th to bring this book in German out to the market. From the very beginning, in 2020, I was wondering what is going on here? And I started writing reports for the family and friends and colleagues, for instance, about the masks. And then I wrote quite a few documentations when we saw the side effects and I described that this was going on like a tsunami. More and more side effects appeared, and each time when I got news, I distributed my pamphlets to my family and friends and so on, but there was not much response. The people said, oh, yes, you're an anti vaxxer, so please leave us alone. This is very. A very dramatic situation and we have to get vaccinated. So in 2023, I decided to write a book because with my little documentations, I could just not get through to sufficiently many people. And so I started writing this book. I got help from a couple of people and I found an editorial house with Rubicon in Germany who produced this book. And I went through many, many settings with a lady who wrote the book and who really put it in the right text. So it came out end of 2025. But I have done a lot of work before, and my interest is not only to publish this in German. I have published it in February in France, and now it will go to the United States. But in France, for instance, the situation is even worse than in Germany because the people are very reluctant to listen to people like me. And the story here is about Professor Raoult and Perona, who lost their jobs and so on, such as in the United States with Peter and McCulloch. They were just not invited anymore to TV shows. And the French are not interested. Most of the people say, well, it's behind us, let's forget about it. I don't want to hear any more about it. And this is a big error, because as we all know, this technology provides now many, many new compounds based on the same defective technology that shall be given to the WHO world through the help of WHO for all sorts of diseases. So this is the technology that will be provided to everybody. And if the contract between WHO and the countries will be successful, then we will be imposed. They will impose all these things on us. And that's why I write this book. I really want to warn the people not to believe that this is the solution, but that they stay back from getting vaccinated.

Helmut, when you were doing all your research and writing this book, what are the most shocking discoveries that you discovered?

That was the moment when I saw the documents that Pfizer and Biontech have proposed to the FDA for approval. I expected a couple of toxicology studies at least, but there was almost nothing. They have performed two little rat toxicology studies in order to evaluate the general toxicology. And interestingly, the first of these Studies started in March 2020 in order to be. To have the results ready for the start of the phase one in end of April, this study was performed with a final clinical candidate, but with a very variation variant number eight. This is obviously only a very minor difference between, with the final candidate, but it's different. But the, the final study for phase one or the ongoing development was started in July 2020 and the results were available in November. So this study was parallel to the clinical studies and it couldn't have an influence on the clinical study. And these two were the only general toxicology studies. And the third study was a reproductive toxicology study which was started in the middle of 2020. And the results were only available after launch of the compound. So this had no impact for instance on the, on women. And there were about 20000 women in the, in the big study and nobody could really be prepared for side effects. I mean also in this, a big clinical study that they saw impact, an impact on the, on the menstrual cycle. And well, there are books which describe that people with severe side effects were just excluded from the study. So we just do not know whether this study was really giving us sufficient information. However, the study that was mentioned 10 minutes ago, the overall summary of the first two months after launch, they showed a lot of impact on pregnancy and among others, there were over 11200 death cases. So 1 knew very quickly that there were things going on that were not, never have never seen be seen before. And nobody, nobody reacted. So my, my observation is that everybody close the eyes and especially the authorities are, are deeply involved in this mafia system. They, they should have never accepted to launch this, these compounds without sound toxicological research. And we have the proof from a German institution which is similar to the cdc, the Robert Koch Institute. It has performed protocols of their meetings. And in April 2020 they decided that there were no, no experimental studies to go on, so no safety and efficacy studies before launch of the compound. And this for nothing but a human experiment. If you do not do the necessary animal experiments before you treat human beings, then this is something that we have gone through in, in the 40s and under Hitler. So this really is in unacceptable. And this was for me really a turning point. And I was horrified. But what by what was, what, what was I.

So how did they get away with it? I mean that's a big question. How did we all. Well, I say we. How did so many fall for it? And will there be accountability? And will they try and do it again?

Yes, you know that in the United states, beginning of February 2020, DARPA said that there was a national security threat despite the fact that there was not a real national security threat. And so the PREP act was put in action. This law which gives the military a lot of possibilities. Everybody who produces and who researches on these compounds, everybody who acknowledges them, who accepts them for a launch, everybody who then distributes them is out of liability responsibility. So there is a liability shield. And I can only explain to myself that under these conditions the pharmaceutical industry, industry said nobody can do us any harm or attack us if we are just doing the minimum. And I have seen and this is mostly work of Sasha Latipova who has very much dug into, into this system. The, the, the, the, the Department of Defense has ordered by, from Pfizer the production of hundreds of millions of doses against this, this virus. But everything that was quality and safety was excluded. This was not included in the contract with Pfizer. And so Pfizer must have assumed that everything which was not in the contract had not to absolutely to be done. And so they just did very poor little rat studies. And the reproductive toxicology study was also not, not done to the, at the international standards. And this is really scandal.

Where can we get your book? It's due, it's out tomorrow. Everybody it. And so I presume because our CHD store is not ready yet, you're going to say Amazon, right?

Sorry, I didn't get that. How can people buy your book?

Yes, well, directly at Children's Health I assume and I'm not sure about the distribution system, but most probably Amazon will also distribute this book.

I think everybody, it's going to be Amazon for now. Our bookstore is not quite ready but how much. Thank you so much for being on this morning for doing all that work to educate us and the future generations. We truly appreciate you.

I thank you very much and sorry for my poor English sometimes like a couple of words, but I hope that it was understandable and well, the story is not over and my, my biggest hope is I would put that in three categories. The first one is to wake up the people and in order to not get again in the same situation and accept vaccinations against something which is not real. That's the first point because Covid is not over and new diseases shall be treated by the same technology. And we should really oppose to that. The second one is we should put the names of the responsible persons of this mafia on the blackboard so that they can be put in front of a judge and take over their responsibility. And the third one very important one is the victims must be, must be helped these people must be helped with all the costs that they have. And even if this will only be a drop on the hot stone, these people have lost their lives and the ease of their lives. And therefore it is important that responsible people get punished and that the judges accept that these victims are vaccine victims. And with these three ideas, I hope that this book helps a little bit.

Hermit, thank you so much for being on this morning. I look forward to reading your book.

Thank you Polly very much and I hope to see you again." "