source
In two days, it will be exactly 25 years since the US was struck by the deadliest terrorist attack in its history — and the 9/11 Toronto Hearings documentary, which compiles the most compelling counter-movements against the official narrative, is now fully available again on social media. Journalist Dan Dicks has shared the film
9/11: Decade of Deception , just as Western media are gearing up for a wave of commemorations that will polish up the official narrative once again.
- What exactly were the Toronto Hearings?
On the tenth anniversary of the attacks, dozens of experts gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. Engineers, chemists, physicists, and historians testified over four days before an international panel of judges and jurists. Among them was the honorary president of the Italian Supreme Court, Ferdinando Imposimato, a man who has investigated terrorism cases at the highest level. The goal was not entertainment or speculation: it concerned evidence that was systematically presented and assessed, concluding that a completely new, independent investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001, is absolutely necessary.
- What is wrong with the official version?
The core of the scientific objection focuses on the collapse of three WTC buildings — the two towers and WTC 7. The latter building, 47 stories high, collapsed without being struck by a plane. According to experts who participated in the 9/11 Toronto Hearings, the collapse exhibits all the hallmarks of a controlled demolition: symmetrical fall, virtually free fall of more than thirty meters, and a dust cloud comparable to those seen in known demolitions. Never before in the history of modern skyscrapers had a steel high-rise collapsed due to fire — and on September 11, 2001, this reportedly happened three times in one day.
- Free fall as a smokescreen for NIST
One of the strongest arguments concerns the measurable acceleration due to gravity of WTC 7. Measurements show that the building fell for more than two seconds at an acceleration equal to that of gravity — the so-called free fall. This is physically impossible if the building had to overcome its own load-bearing structure at the same time. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which conducted the official investigation, implicitly acknowledged this free fall period in its own report — but never drew the logical conclusion from it. Moreover, the NIST report was never subjected to peer review, a fundamental shortcoming for any scientific claim.
- Thermite in the dust of Ground Zero
Scientists analyzing dust samples from the immediate vicinity of Ground Zero found iron micro-spheres that can only form after metal has been in a liquid state. Additionally, material was found whose chemical composition closely resembles nanothermite. These findings were published in 2009 in the scientific journal
Open Chemical Physics Journal by a team led by chemist Niels Harrit. Temperatures high enough to melt steel—above 1,500 degrees Celsius—can never be reached by normal office fires.
- Eyewitnesses ignored, evidence covered up
More than 150 eyewitnesses—firefighters, police officers, journalists, and bystanders—described explosions in and around the towers on the day itself. In the 585 pages of the 9/11 Commission report, these testimonies are reduced to a single sentence fragment. The NIST report mentions zero eyewitnesses to explosions. Surviving relatives such as Lorie Van Auken, whose husband died on the 105th floor of the North Tower, describe how they fought for years for a thorough, independent investigation—and how they were systematically obstructed by the White House, by political appointments, and by limited investigative powers.
- A pattern that goes beyond buildings
The 9/11 Toronto Hearings are not limited to the physics of collapsing buildings. Speakers also pointed to the peculiar course of events surrounding the Pentagon, the absence of wreckage at the crash of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania, and the ties between the CIA and Al-Qaeda — dating back to the Soviet-Afghan War. Moreover, plans for military intervention in the Middle East were already circulating among think tanks such as the Project for the New American Century prior to September 11, 2001. The attacks provided the desired political momentum — and the Patriot Act, two wars, and a permanently expanded security apparatus followed in rapid succession.
- Why this still counts 25 years later
Re-showing this documentary is more than nostalgia. The questions posed by the 9/11 Toronto Hearings have never been answered by any government or court. Anyone who views the footage and arguments objectively understands why a serious movement of engineers, scientists, and legal experts has refused to consider this story closed for 25 years. The question is not whether you believe this — the question is whether you are willing to look at the evidence.
- dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
True Story of the Pentagon’s Missing Trillions 2026 Update
Reply With Quote
Re: True Story of the Pentagon’s Missing Trillions 2026 Update
Bookmarks