Current Wikileaks and Assange News & Releases

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Russian Bear (here)
...

source

• Current Wikileaks and Assange News & Releases

[Jsaac]

Wanted to get this in circulation. Not sure if Wikileaks or Tor are still or were ever compromised, but this is of historical interest at least.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Jsaac (here)


Wanted to get this in circulation. Not sure if Wikileaks or Tor are still or were ever compromised, but this is of historical interest at least.

Many thanks! (And a very warm welcome to the forum )

To read the text in the image attachment, click on it (in Jsaac's post above, not this one) a couple of times to see it at full size. The text is very readable then.

I searched for the original, and could only find it as part of a LONG page on archive.org. Search on the page for a key word like 'personnel', and you can see the entire thread in text-copyable form.

https://archive.org/stream/TOPSECRET...Files_djvu.txt

That's a plain text file, but this page shows download links for other formats such as PDF and MS Word:

https://archive.org/details/TOPSECRETPOSTSFiles

[Ravenlocke]

WikiLeaks
@wikileaks
·
Dec 17
JULIAN ASSANGE FILES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NOBEL FOUNDATION OVER “INSTRUMENT OF WAR” PEACE PRIZE

WikiLeaks Founder Alleges 2025 Award to María Corina Machado Constitutes Misappropriation, Facilitation of War Crimes Under Swedish Law, Seeks Freeze of 11 million SEK ($1.18 million USD) of Pending Transfers to Machado

STOCKHOLM — 11:00am CET December 17, 2025

Julian Assange today filed a criminal complaint in Sweden accusing 30 individuals associated with the Nobel Foundation, including its leadership, of committing serious suspected crimes, including the crime of gross misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the financing of the crime of aggression.

The complaint shows that Alfred Nobel's 1895 will explicitly mandates that the peace prize go to the individual who during the proceeding year “conferred the greatest benefit to humankind” by doing “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”

Assange argues that “The political decision of the Norwegian selection committee does not suspend the fiduciary duty of Swedish funds administrators”. “Any disbursement contradicting this mandate constitutes misappropriation from the endowment”.

The complaint, submitted simultaneously to the Swedish Economic Crime Authority (Ekobrottsmyndigheten) and the Swedish War Crimes Unit (Krigsbrottsenheten), states that the suspects, including Nobel Foundation Chair Astrid Söderbergh Widding and Executive Director Hanna Stjärne, converted “an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” through suspected “serious criminality” including:

1) Breach of trust, gross misappropriation and conspiracy in relation to the pending 11 million SEK ($1.18 million) disbursement of the Peace prize monies to Maria Corina Machado, whose prior and ongoing actions categorically exclude her from the criteria set out in Alfred Nobel's will;

2) Facilitation of war crimes, including the crime of aggression and crimes against humanity, breaching Sweden's obligations under Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute, because the accused are aware of Machado's incitement and endorsement of the U.S. commission of international crimes, and knew or ought to have known that the disbursement of Nobel monies would contribute to extrajudicial killings of civilians and shipwrecked survivors at sea and are in breach of their obligation to cease disbursements.

Assange notes that the members of the Nobel Foundation have previously exercised their supervisory authority over the prizes and their disbursements by withholding Literature Prize disbursements in 2018. “Failure to intervene here, despite U.S. war crimes off the Venezuelan coast and Machado’s key role in furthering aggression” incurs criminal liability.

“Alfred Nobel's endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war,” Assange states. The accused have concrete legal obligations because they are tasked with “ensuring the fulfillment of the intended purpose of Alfred Nobel’s will, that is, to end wars and war crimes, and not to enable them.”

MACHADO'S INCITEMENT OF THE LARGEST U.S. MILITARY BUILDUP SINCE THE IRAQ WAR MAKE HER CATEGORICALLY INELIGIBLE

The complaint notes how the Nobel announcement and ceremony have occurred in what military analysts describe as “the largest U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis”—now exceeding 15,000 personnel, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford. The escalation continues as President Trump announced on December 10, two days after the Nobel ceremony, that U.S. strikes would be “starting by land.” The Venezuela strategy is part of what Trump’s Secretary for War, Peter Hegseth, calls a shift toward “maximum lethality, not tepid legality” and “going on the offence”.

Against this backdrop, Assange states that “Machado has continued to incite the Trump Administration to pursue its escalatory path”, including by entering into a conspiracy to give the U.S. administration access to $1.7 trillion in oil reserves and other natural resources through privatization once Maduro is ousted.

“Using her elevated position as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Machado may well have tipped the balance in favour of war, facilitated by the named suspects.” Assange states in the criminal complaint.

The complaint lists evidence of this incitement of U.S. military intervention, as well as praising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct in Gaza. Her statements include:

- “Military escalation may be the only way... the United States may need to intervene directly” (30 October 2025)
- Machado called U.S. military strikes on civilian vessels, which have killed at least 95 people to date, “justified” and “visionary”.
- Machado dedicated the prize to U.S. President Trump, because he “finally has put Venezuela... in terms of a priority for the United States national security”
- Historical statements including 2014 testimony before U.S. Congress where she said: “The only path left is the use of force”

The filing cites extensive third-party expert and institutional opposition to Machado receiving the award:

- 21 Norwegian peace organizations declared: “Machado is the opposite of a peace laureate.”
- Nobel Peace Prize laureate Adolfo Pérez Esquivel stated: “Giving the prize to someone who calls for foreign invasion is a mockery of Alfred Nobel's will.”
- The Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) confirmed Machado “has called for military intervention in Venezuela.”

REQUESTED ACTION

The complaint notes that “There is a real risk that the funds derived from Nobel’s endowment have been or will be intentionally or negligently diverted from their charitable purpose to facilitate aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.”

Assange requests that Swedish authorities:

1. Immediately freeze of the pending SEK 11,000,000 monetary prize transfer and any remaining related budget and secure return of the medal.
2. Investigate the named persons and Foundation officers and associated entities for breach of trust, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and conspiracy.
3. Seize of board minutes, emails, group chats, financial records.
4. Interrogate Widding, Stjärne and other suspects.
5. Fully investigate domestically or refer the matter to the ICC (Rome Statute Art. 25(3)(c)).

“This complaint seeks the immediate freezing of all remaining funds and a full criminal investigation lest the Nobel Peace Prize be permanently converted from an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” Assange concludes.

https://x.com/wikileaks/status/2001260159432290686

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Interesting. A precursor to something? I do wonder what he has to say.

https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331
@JulianAssange
I'm back.

[Tintin]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Interesting. A precursor to something? I do wonder what he has to say.

https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331
@JulianAssange
I'm back.

It'll likely be around issues concerning AI methinks.

Great to see him back! A true hero

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Tintin (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Interesting. A precursor to something? I do wonder what he has to say.

https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331
@JulianAssange
I'm back.

It'll likely be around issues concerning AI methinks.

Great to see him back! A true hero

Yep! (And you beat me to the comment about Assange surely going to make a statement about AI safety. )

[Arcturian108]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Interesting. A precursor to something? I do wonder what he has to say.

https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331
@JulianAssange
I'm back.

Recently, after being quite active on X for about three years I have been thrown off X three times, and reinstated twice. When I was reinstated, their people told me I had done nothing wrong. But the third time, they wrote that I was using "inauthentic behavior" with no further explanation. I believe there is something wrong with Musk's algorithm. Now they allow me to see the tweets, but not follow anyone new, or interact with the site. I wish I could follow Assange....

[mountain_jim]

I for one am hoping he tells what he knows about Seth Rich's leak of Democrat/Clinton/Podesta emails that likely got Seth killed.



https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2100...730620611?s=20

Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga

Buckle up. 💥

Quote
Michael Flynn Jr
@realmflynnJR

His name was Seth Rich… x.com/julianassange/…


https://x.com/Britain_People/status/...125193601?s=20

Britain People
@Britain_People
REMEMBER when Hillary Clinton wanted to “just drone” @JulianAssange because he informed the world about the corruption in the Clinton and Obama administration?

There was zero outrage. Media and DC literally did not care.

#Wikileaks

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Tintin (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331
@JulianAssange
I'm back.

It'll likely be around issues concerning AI methinks.

Yep! (And you beat me to the comment about Assange surely going to make a statement about AI safety. )

I'll take the other side of that prediction. Either Assange will focus elsewhere, or if he mentions AI at all, either he will consider AI to be a mixed bag, useful to both those he supports and those he opposes, or he will warn us that the current "AI fear" campaign is intended to gain central control of AI by the "globalists" (whatever Assange calls them).

[Arcturian108]

Assange might have been the green light to go ahead with any incriminating evidence against the Democrat Party, just in time for the mid-term elections?

[Mike Gorman]

Posted by Arcturian108 (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Interesting. A precursor to something? I do wonder what he has to say.

https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331
@JulianAssange
I'm back.

Recently, after being quite active on X for about three years I have been thrown off X three times, and reinstated twice. When I was reinstated, their people told me I had done nothing wrong. But the third time, they wrote that I was using "inauthentic behavior" with no further explanation. I believe there is something wrong with Musk's algorithm. Now they allow me to see the tweets, but not follow anyone new, or interact with the site. I wish I could follow Assange....

I had quite an active X account for a couple of years, with a few thousand followers, not that I am a chaser of 'vanity metrics' - I was known as 'Editor' (not doxing myself the account is no more) I said to the EU foreign relations lady (Kallas) that she is not qualified to address a Kindergarten class, that her Russophobia is contributing to the downfall of the EU, also I told Starmer that British forces were active in Ukraine and that stray drone a few months back was not Russian...a few things like this, I was told a complaint had been made & my account was henceforth restricted - so much for free speech. I have another account, but I won't reveal the name for this one. Yes X can be erratic with its speech values.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
I'll take the other side of that prediction. Either Assange will focus elsewhere, or ...

The following discussion presents a more likely context for Assange announcing that he's back. Notice that Assange made this announcement on the 17th of September of this year, and that (if the following discussion is accurate) Q posted a one word post, on the 17th of September of a year back when Q was active during Trump's first term, stating "Assange".

I expect that Assange announcing that he's back is teasing the unveiling of much more information that Assange had in his Wikileaks data that has not yet been published.

(and note the number "17" multiple times above in this post, and remind one's self, what is the 17th letter of the alphabet?)

The Q/Assange topic is discussed in the first four minutes of the following:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tjTN9yQZA6o