Vaccination Injuries On Record for Covid19

[ExomatrixTV]

U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shared shocking findings regarding the DTP vaccine during a Children's Health Defense conference in Washington, D.C. — a drug that was withdrawn from the market in the United States decades ago but is still administered to tens of millions of children in Africa and Asia to this day.

RFK Jr. says pro-vaccine researchers found girls given the DTP shot were 10 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO DIE over the next three months than unvaccinated children.

The girls weren’t dying of diphtheria, tetanus, or whooping cough. However, they were dying of sepsis, respiratory problems, and common infections.

So on paper, it “worked.” Then a pro-vaccine Danish team looked closer and reached an unexpected conclusion: the shot was killing MORE children than it saved.

Girls dying at ten times the rate of the unvaccinated, and the media ignored it. This should be front page news.

• source

• Removed in the West, still sprayed in Africa

In the 1980s, the DTP vaccine was taken out of use in the US due to an unacceptably high number of serious side effects. Kennedy cited NIH figures showing that one in three hundred children risked brain damage or death. Yet the vaccine was never withdrawn worldwide. On the contrary: through international health programs, it was actively rolled out in low-income countries. An estimated 61 million children in Africa and Asia are still administered the drug.

• Gates Foundation and the Danish research application

Kennedy described how the Gates Foundation and other parties approached the Danish government to support the funding of the DTP vaccine program in Africa. The claim was clear: the vaccine had supposedly saved thirty million lives. However, the Danes decided not to blindly accept that assertion. Together with Novo Nordisk, a thorough independent investigation was commissioned.

• A natural experiment in Guinea-Bissau

For that study, Danish scientists traveled to Guinea-Bissau, an African country where Denmark had been running health clinics for years. In those clinics, all children were weighed and checked at the age of three, and again at the age of six months. Due to minor logistical differences—some children arrived a day early or late—some babies received the DTP vaccine at three months and others not until six months. This unintentionally created a perfect scientific experiment, in which one half of the babies were vaccinated and the other half were not yet.

• A result that shocked the researchers themselves

The Danish team, consisting of scientists who consider themselves outspokenly pro-vaccination, analyzed the survival data of these children. What they found exceeded their worst expectations. Girls who had received the DTP vaccine turned out to die ten times more often in the subsequent three months than the unvaccinated girls. And they did not die from the diseases against which the vaccine was supposed to protect them — not from diphtheria, tetanus, or whooping cough. They died from sepsis, respiratory problems, and everyday infections. The research team's conclusion was as simple as it was alarming: the DTP vaccine killed more children than the three diseases combined had done before the introduction of the vaccination program. The study was published in the scientific journal EBioMedicine in January 2017.

• Ignored by media and health institutions for years

What Kennedy emphasized during his speech, and which can hardly be disputed, is that these findings have never received the attention they deserve. No major headlines, no parliamentary debates, no emergency meetings at the WHO. The research was simply there—published in a peer-reviewed journal—while people in Africa continued vaccinating. For decades, no one in official circles has bothered to take the alarming mortality rates among vaccinated girls seriously. Kennedy called this a textbook example of how mass damage can remain 'hidden in plain sight'.

• Pressure on GAVI to stop the vaccine

Kennedy indicated that active pressure is now being exerted on GAVI — the global vaccine alliance co-funded by the Gates Foundation, but also by countries like the Netherlands — to remove the DTP vaccine from the programs.

• Why this is bigger than one vaccine

This story is about more than one vaccine. It shows how international health programs, funded by private billionaires and major pharmaceutical players, can continue operating for years without the actual outcomes being critically scrutinized. Vaccines that have been withdrawn from the market in the West due to proven harm are simply being continued in vulnerable African communities — under the guise of humanitarianism.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

source

• Devotees of a hypnotized cult.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Florida Sues Pfizer for Lying About COVID Shots

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LJ6ICcS9mV4

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed a lawsuit against Pfizer and its CEO Albert Bourla, alleging that the company deceptively marketed COVID-19 vaccines as safe and effective while failing to disclose risks such as myocarditis and other adverse events. Jimmy cites statements from Uthmeier, Anthony Fauci’s emails and diary entries, and accounts from people who reported vaccine injuries to argue that government officials and pharmaceutical companies knew about potential risks but publicly minimized them.

The discussion also features testimony from Maddie de Garay, a participant in Pfizer’s adolescent vaccine trial who experienced severe health problems after vaccination, and Ernest Ramirez, whose 16-year-old son died following a Pfizer dose, while Jimmy makes additional claims about underreported vaccine injuries and deaths.

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

source

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• “I have several billionaires in my practice. Not a single one of them has ever vaccinated their kids.” - Pediatrician, Dr. Brian Thornburg:

• source

The fact that billionaires do not have their children vaccinated is a revelation that raises many questions about what the richest and best-informed people in the world actually know — and what the rest of the population is being led to believe. American pediatrician Brian Thornburg made this remarkable statement during a podcast conversation with lawyer Aaron Siri, and his words left little to the imagination.

• A pediatrician with a special clientele

Thornburg runs a practice in Naples, Florida, that caters exclusively to the ultra-rich. Over the years, his patient base has included “about six or seven billionaires.” The common denominator? Not one of them has ever had their children vaccinated. Not a single vaccine. That is no coincidence, Thornburg suggests — that is a conscious, deliberate choice made by people who have the means to thoroughly educate themselves and hire the best doctors.

• The highly educated are the biggest skeptics.

Thornburg's revelation aligns seamlessly with what his conversation partner Aaron Siri has long emphasized: the group of Americans who do not have their children vaccinated at all consists of a remarkably large proportion of highly educated people. Think of people with a PhD, scientists, and people with in-depth knowledge of medical literature. It is precisely they—and not the “ignorant” or “backward” parents as government campaigns often suggest—who are consciously saying no to the full vaccination schedule.

This stands in stark contrast to the dominant narrative that vaccine hesitancy is a symptom of ignorance or misinformation. The CDC has been complaining about declining vaccination rates for years, but generally conveniently conceals the fact that it is precisely the highly educated and scientifically knowledgeable parents who are dropping out. That is a politically uncomfortable fact that is carefully evaded in official communication. The question no one dares to ask out loud: why would well-informed people make the same decision en masse if that decision were irrational? And why do the people with access to the very best medical advisors — the billionaires in Thornburg’s practice — choose unanimously to leave their children unvaccinated?

• Thornburg also withdrew from the system itself.

It is not only his patients who draw a line. Thornburg himself decided to stop offering vaccines in his practice — a step that is still considered professional suicide in the medical world. Yet he took it. After twenty years as a pediatrician, including forensic work involving the most serious forms of child abuse, he has come to the conclusion that the interests of the child do not always coincide with the interests of the system that claims to care for that child. His story fits into a broader movement of doctors and scientists who are publicly breaking with the consensus — not because they are “anti-science,” but precisely because they know the scientific literature too well to blindly follow the official line.

• The elite plays a different game

A pattern is visible that is difficult to ignore: the people who lobby hardest for mandatory vaccinations, universal inoculation programs, and the stigmatization of doubting parents are rarely the ones who bear the risks themselves. Politicians, CEOs of pharmaceutical companies, and media owners send their children to private schools with low vaccination rates and consult doctors like Thornburg.

It is time to stop framing vaccine skepticism as a problem of the ignorant masses. The facts point in a different direction: the more one knows, the more critical the questions become. And the wealthiest among us—with the most information and the most freedom of choice—are quietly and consistently choosing a different path.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

--o-O-o--


Dr. Michael Yeadon Statement: The Great Reset on Trial:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BAuq1K6yjdk

Attorney Peter Stassen has brought a lawsuit against the architects of The Great Reset and has entered testimony from experts Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr. Joeseph Sansone, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Katherine Watt, into the record, to prove Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and Albert Bourla have committed crimes against humanity.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• “I have several billionaires in my practice. Not a single one of them has ever vaccinated their kids.” - Pediatrician, Dr. Brian Thornburg:

• source

The fact that billionaires do not have their children vaccinated is a revelation that raises many questions about what the richest and best-informed people in the world actually know — and what the rest of the population is being led to believe. American pediatrician Brian Thornburg made this remarkable statement during a podcast conversation with lawyer Aaron Siri, and his words left little to the imagination.

• A pediatrician with a special clientele

Thornburg runs a practice in Naples, Florida, that caters exclusively to the ultra-rich. Over the years, his patient base has included “about six or seven billionaires.” The common denominator? Not one of them has ever had their children vaccinated. Not a single vaccine. That is no coincidence, Thornburg suggests — that is a conscious, deliberate choice made by people who have the means to thoroughly educate themselves and hire the best doctors.

• The highly educated are the biggest skeptics.

Thornburg's revelation aligns seamlessly with what his conversation partner Aaron Siri has long emphasized: the group of Americans who do not have their children vaccinated at all consists of a remarkably large proportion of highly educated people. Think of people with a PhD, scientists, and people with in-depth knowledge of medical literature. It is precisely they—and not the “ignorant” or “backward” parents as government campaigns often suggest—who are consciously saying no to the full vaccination schedule.

This stands in stark contrast to the dominant narrative that vaccine hesitancy is a symptom of ignorance or misinformation. The CDC has been complaining about declining vaccination rates for years, but generally conveniently conceals the fact that it is precisely the highly educated and scientifically knowledgeable parents who are dropping out. That is a politically uncomfortable fact that is carefully evaded in official communication. The question no one dares to ask out loud: why would well-informed people make the same decision en masse if that decision were irrational? And why do the people with access to the very best medical advisors — the billionaires in Thornburg’s practice — choose unanimously to leave their children unvaccinated?

• Thornburg also withdrew from the system itself.

It is not only his patients who draw a line. Thornburg himself decided to stop offering vaccines in his practice — a step that is still considered professional suicide in the medical world. Yet he took it. After twenty years as a pediatrician, including forensic work involving the most serious forms of child abuse, he has come to the conclusion that the interests of the child do not always coincide with the interests of the system that claims to care for that child. His story fits into a broader movement of doctors and scientists who are publicly breaking with the consensus — not because they are “anti-science,” but precisely because they know the scientific literature too well to blindly follow the official line.

• The elite plays a different game

A pattern is visible that is difficult to ignore: the people who lobby hardest for mandatory vaccinations, universal inoculation programs, and the stigmatization of doubting parents are rarely the ones who bear the risks themselves. Politicians, CEOs of pharmaceutical companies, and media owners send their children to private schools with low vaccination rates and consult doctors like Thornburg.

It is time to stop framing vaccine skepticism as a problem of the ignorant masses. The facts point in a different direction: the more one knows, the more critical the questions become. And the wealthiest among us—with the most information and the most freedom of choice—are quietly and consistently choosing a different path.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

--o-O-o--

Dr. Michael Yeadon Statement: The Great Reset on Trial:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BAuq1K6yjdk

Attorney Peter Stassen has brought a lawsuit against the architects of The Great Reset and has entered testimony from experts Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr. Joeseph Sansone, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Katherine Watt, into the record, to prove Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and Albert Bourla have committed crimes against humanity.

source

source

source

• A Landmark Civil Lawsuit in The Netherlands

The Case at a Glance

A definitive, historic legal proceeding marking an unprecedented confrontation over global pharmaceutical and institutional accountability.

The historic civil lawsuit in the Netherlands is brought by seven Pfizer “vaccine”-injured individuals, represented by attorney Peter W.H. Stassen, seeking individual accountability from global figures like Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte, along with the State of The Netherlands and no fewer than thirteen high-ranking defendants from politics, business, media, and science.

This lawsuit marks an unprecedented confrontation between citizens and global institutions. While defendants cling to the official narrative of “safe and effective” mRNA injections, the plaintiffs’ case presents an uncompromising clash of hard facts substantiated by expert evidence. The divergence is so profound that the plaintiffs' pleadings formally characterise the rollout as the greatest genocide in history, putting the establishment’s preferred pandemic narrative directly on trial.

The core argument in the proceedings is as brief as it is clear: COVID-19 is not a disease but a project known as “Covid-19: The Great Reset.” The defendants in these civil proceedings are being held personally liable with their private assets on the grounds of tort. Through their actions and omissions, they unlawfully misled the plaintiffs, as a result of which the latter received a Covid-19 injection, causing serious damage to their physical integrity and their mental and physical health.

After Bill Gates lost his initial jurisdictional challenge, the court ordered the case to move forward into a highly significant substantive merits hearing scheduled for 22 October 2026. This landmark case marks the first time global architects of the Great Reset are legally compelled to present a formal defence against substantiated allegations of institutional deception and public harm in an open court of law.

Powerful, compelling and explosive evidence has been submitted to the Court in these proceedings (September 22) by Sasha Latypova, Dr Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts andJoseph Sansone. The significance of that evidence extends far beyond the hearing itself. It forms part of an extraordinary evidential record which can be examined, scrutinised and built upon long after these proceedings have concluded. What has been assembled and placed before the Court provides a substantial body of material from which future lawyers, researchers and litigants can draw... in the Netherlands and in jurisdictions around the world.

This case is bigger than one judgment. It will not result in prison sentences, but the evidence placed on the judicial record and the legal ground broken here can have consequences far beyond this courtroom — providing a foundation for future cases and, we hope, inspiring lawyers around the world to stand up and pursue further routes to accountability.

• thenetherlandscase.com

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

• source

• source