Was Japanese earthquake and other catastrophies made by HAARP?

[mondaze]

i dont believe this is down to haarp. i think they may be stirring it up after the event with a few zaps into the mix, but given prevailing conditions with moon, sun and planetary torsions i think it was a "natural" event. Gaia under pressure.

[starsmoonmtns]

Certainly lots to be considered........... astronomically and manmade...........
I'll be the 1st to say " I don't know" but I have a pretty good idea of what 'people' are capable of.
And,,, that is a hell of a lot of earthquakes and shallow..... still ongoing!
Only 'time / truth? lol.... will tell'
Peace All
esp those in Japan.............

ps
now is the 'time' for big changes to happen,,, anything is possible and mother earth WILL clean up herself....with or without us!!!

[Hervé]

To get an idea of the kind of straw needed in order to get our camel/turtle island out of commision, see this:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=j1jIjx0XF_U

Stolen from this post:

1. 7th March 2011 15:49#1
shiva777
How to make an earth quake
https://youtube.com/watch?v=j1jIjx0XF_U

[Tuza]

Posted by jorr lundstrom (here)

Posted by slipknoted (here)
my dog just had gas maybe it was haarp ? come on people. if you look into stressfull time's things manifest by us are thoughts are emotions i think it play's a part here not always conspiracy's or haarp, mother earth is going through very stressfull time's her self and i'm not saying haarp is harmless either but blaming haarp and the mind set it give's to people concern's me.

If you suffer from your dogs flatulenses it probaly the Illuminati or the 33 behind it. LOL

Ooh you crack me up Jorr, everytime I read a post you make me really laugh out loud, thanks again special man.

Okay down to biz.

Is everyone forgetting something here or do I have to again throw the fingers over the darn keyboard to remind you..............looks my fingers hurt then.

1. magnetic north off, also evidence, and I am not going to give you the sites, look at stan deyo's site or something, evidence of a polar shift which the mayans predicted like ages ago.

2. Find on youtube the vids where they explain what is happening with the galactic core and the magnetics affecting the sun which affects the earth, us, also remember the mayan stuff.

3. Solar stuff happening.


4. Queensland unnatural floods, New Zealand, Japan.....................and more to come even worse,

WE are in smack dab of the centre of the earth changes the ascension. Forget benny for a while and go back and do your stuff again its all there.

Heavens above, again with the darn haarp stuff.

[Wookie]

I'm not sure how to say this without seeming heartless. War is good business, if war is not possible natural disasters offer some of the same perks. While a population might openly object to increased military spending, they would probbally have no issues with spending trillions rebuilding after an earthquake. It may be a huge leap, but working in demolition I can't count the number of time I have demolished perfectly good buildings/homes just so the owners could get a tax break. Maybe its not the mob holding countries at ransom with a scary earth quake weapon. Maybe its some Business offering a jump start to a stagnant economy. Hey its just business. I want to be wrong. I don't want the power to cause earthquakes to be real. I want the world to learn from the mistakes and shortcomings. But hey its just business don't take it personally.

Peaceful Journeys Wookie

[cheez_2806]

and the chinese news is like saying because of this earthquake, the time on earth and the spinning of the earth will be quicker or something...??

[Bollinger]

Above table shows earthquake statistics between 2000 and 2010. The survey was taken in January 2011.

You will see that the data follows the classic normal distribution and there doesn't seem to be any significant variance. Almost all naturally (random) occurring events follow this pattern. If you have a particular year or magnitude range that varies significantly from previous or subsequent data, you may have a case for thinking that something unusual is going on.

It is so easy to blame some evil perpetrator but before you do, cast an eye on the facts and exercise a sizeable degree of objectivity before embarking on some idea that sounds good but is negated by known facts.

It is one thing to say that events such as 911 and the Oklahoma bombing are rife with strange anomalies that suggest there was foul play by the authorities, but quite another to assume the same for events of this nature.

Let us assume that technology such as HAARP may be used to cause earthquakes. That in itself is a huge assumption with no real evidence (other than words spoken by people who at best look and sound a bit unstable) to back it up. But, let’s assume it anyway. Why would anyone use such a blunt instrument to achieve what they have been doing so well for so long without any such technology? Devastation like this can only bring a reduction in power and wealth; how is that helpful to anyone, least of all the controllers. The assertions are simply not supported by the statistics or logic.

We have to be mindful of what the powers do in the name of greed and self-gratification but we must also exercise objectivity and not allow ourselves to be swept away by fantastic ideas that only serve to make us look silly.

[Icecold]

Posted by cheez_2806 (here)
and the chinese news is like saying because of this earthquake, the time on earth and the spinning of the earth will be quicker or something...??

Hi Cheez, do you have a link to that story?

Cheers,

Ice

[Hervé]

Hi Bollinger!

I see that your table started in 2000; hence this question: would you have a similar table from 1994 backward to whenever statistically significant?

Simply because HAARP officially started in 1994. Therefore, all the data in your table could be assumed to be a HAARP "normal" distribution... experimenting with it.

Thx

[Bollinger]

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Hi Bollinger!

I see that your table started in 2000; hence this question: would you have a similar table from 1994 backward to whenever statistically significant?

Simply because HAARP officially started in 1994. Therefore, all the data in your table could be assumed to be a HAARP "normal" distribution... experimenting with it.

Thx

Above table shows stats for decade 1990 to 1999.


Below table shows average number of quakes per annum since 1900 to present according to
magnitude.

8+ 1
7 - 7.9 15
6 - 6.9 134
5 - 5.9 1319
4 - 4.9 13,000
3 - 3.9 130,000 (estimated)
2 - 2.9 1,300,000 (estimated)

Not much variance here either (this was also taken from USGS).

One important point to note is that the number of recorded earthquakes have gone up dramatically over the last 2 decades simply because technology is much better at picking up those with smaller magnitude (e.g. between 3 and 5). More significantly though, the larger quakes (i.e. those that are 6 and above) do not appear to have increased or decreased by any significant margin.

[astrid]

Okies heres another interesting item to add to the mix.
Mel fabregas, who is has the Veritas show, and posts under "Veritas" on here, mentioned this on his facebook page..

"One of my contacts in Japan said something very interesting. She was outside one of our military bases and observed many ships leaving very fast toward the north of Japan...ON WEDNESDAY. Remember, Japan has been threatening to get rid of our bases there for some time. Also, a piece of news that didn't make it here is the fact that the Japanese Foreign Minister quit last week..."

[mondaze]

who collates the statistics Bollinger?

[Bo Atkinson]

Re: Was Japanese earthquake and other catastrophies made by HAARP?

Or:

Can any given quake today be 'triggered' with specially phased electro-magnetic-energy, or other, little documented, artifice?


Natural tectonic pressures may provide a reservoir of latent energy. Energy is surely stored in countless weapon types. Weapons can seem harmless until triggered. While artifice has always been pulling all sorts of triggers, at every level of magnitude.

[Ilie Pandia]

Posted by mondaze (here)
who collates the statistics Bollinger?

That is something that I would like to know also... what is the source of those stats...

Other than that, in my view Bollinger makes some good points: If HAARP was used to generate this earthquake in Japan I think we should ask these questions:
- Why Japan (and not some other country)
- Why now? (and not next month, year etc)
- Who has to gain from this and what?
(all of the above questions are based on the assumption that HAARP could generate such a quake)

[Bollinger]

Posted by mondaze (here)
who collates the statistics Bollinger?

My uncle Bob.

[andrewgreen]

I wonder if well ever find out if it was Harp. The thing I dont understand is why wouldn't the goverments of countries dont speak out if they are victims of something sinister ?

[Free Bird]

Is HAARP involved? This is what I wrote yesterday on the THAT WAS MASSIVE 9.1 in Japan (Tsunami) thread:

Here's a graph of the HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer taken from the HAARP website: http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi



Note the spike at around 05.46 UTC on 03/11 - It matches the exact time of the start of the earthquake

This seems like conclusive proof that HAARP was involved. I'm going to screen shot this image just in case they remove it.

Peace and Love
-x-

[Bollinger]

Posted by Free Bird (here)
Is HAARP involved? This is what I wrote yesterday on the THAT WAS MASSIVE 9.1 in Japan (Tsunami) thread:

Here's a graph of the HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer taken from the HAARP website: http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi



Note the spike at around 05.46 UTC on 03/11 - It matches the exact time of the start of the earthquake

This seems like conclusive proof that HAARP was involved. I'm going to screen shot this image just in case they remove it.

Peace and Love
-x-

I would not call that conclusive proof at all. In order to call it conclusive proof, you would need to do the negative test as well. That means giving us the graph for a much larger time range to see if we can spot similar spikes that DO NOT coincide with any earthquakes. Then, if that exercise supports your hypothesis, you would have to provide more examples where a spike such as this coincides with the timing of other large earthquakes (most especially the ones in Sumatra in 2004 and Haiti in 2010, both of which I believe were also deemed to be the work of HAARP).

If all that still supports the hypothesis, I'd say you have strong evidence to suggest there is foul play.

[John Parslow]

Hello all

Fulford is always on the money guys. Look back over past videos. Got to Love Fulford

I have to agree, if you check through his predictions he is usually spot on the money; this guy really knows what is going on ...

Regards to all. JP

[Revere]

Avalon,

Three hours ago as I first awoke I turned on the TV to catch a live interview on CNN with a woman (civilian/ non-news person) in Japan. I wish I could find the interview to attach it. The interesting part was she was trying to move the interview to her perplexity concerning the very strange cloud formations she was seeing and claiming that the earthquake had made them! The CNN Anchor would have none of that topic and steered the interview back to their usual drivel that her producer was probably shouting in her ear to ask the interviewee.

I know we all love to speculate on Haarp around here but are their historical precedents for such natural phenomenon after a quake? Yes, we are probably back to speculating that this was HAARP related but I like to look at all possibilities. Could this be a natural affect?

-R-