Benjamin Fulford's posts and reports

[bashi]

Maybe the mistake was not to read this:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...n-Kerry-s-blog

[Hervé]

Supportive evidence for HAARP triggered EQ in Japan:

Hokkaido seismograms of 11-03-2011 show no release build-up, just a sudden one.

[Rocky_Shorz]

quit the spins Ben and tell us what is going on with the Dragons right now...

[Zook]

Posted by bashi (here)
I do not think it was a HAARP event.
The quake was at 05:46 UTC.
The magnetometer readings at HAARP show no anomaly until AFTER 06:00 :

http://planetsave.com/2011/03/15/sat...ami-aftermath/

beginExcerpt
Japan was struck by what is now known as a magnitude-9 level earthquake, which took place on March 11, 2011, at 2:46 p.m. local time (05:46 UTC) off the east coast of Japan. The epicenter was 130 kilometers (80 miles) east of Sendai, and 373 kilometers (231 miles) northeast of Tokyo, and has been labeled the fourth largest in the world since 1900.
end

IOW, if the quake occurred at 2:46pm local time in Japan ... then this is 9 hours ahead of GMT ... or occurred at 5:46am on March 11, 2011 at Greenwich Mean Time. If you look on the graph above, this corresponds absolutely to the highest peak on the graph!

So either you made an honest mistake, Bashi ... or you are confused as to the timestamp of either the HAARP reading; the Sendai EQ; or both.



ps: GMT = UTC
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/html/utc.html

[Rocky_Shorz]

when I want heart pounding news like this I go get wisdom from Sorcha Faal...

must be quiet from the dragons right now...

¤=[Post Update]=¤

come on Zook we were hit by a massive Solar storm right then, is that part of Haarp?

[Rocky_Shorz]

at least he could have made it a better spin...

The enormously powerful rulers of this planet were furious at the Dragons society for trying to right the economy so they lit up their HAARP system and blew em off the map...

[Hervé]

Supportive evidence for HAARP triggered EQ in Japan:

Hokkaido seismograms of 11-03-2011 show no release build-up, just a sudden one.

I personally do not think a solar storm could be this focused.

[Zook]

Posted by Rocky_Shorz (here)
when I want heart pounding news like this I go get wisdom from Sorcha Faal...
must be quiet from the dragons right now...
¤=[Post Update]=¤
come on Zook we were hit by a massive Solar storm right then, is that part of Haarp?

Last I looked, Rockers, the Earth spun at a rate of one cycle per 24 hours. The Earth is divided into 24 zones of 15 degrees each. 2 hours and 46 minutes corresponds to (2x15) + 0.75(15) ~42 degrees of longitude.

If a massive Solar storm caused the Sendai EarthQuake at 2:46 pm local time (142 degrees East longitude) ... then high noon or 12:00pm local time is at a delta of 2:46 hours from Sendai. This roughly corresponds to 42 degrees of longitude ... subtracting 42 from 142, we get 100 degrees East longitude. Curiously enough, this maps onto Ground Zero and the fault line that created the 2004 Indonesian 9.3 Earthquake!

So question begs, if Sendai was the result of a massive Solar storm indirect hit (as you apparently believe) ... then why haven't we seen much tectonic activity along the Indonesian fault line which must have taken a direct solar storm hit (being at high noon) according to your theory?




ps: Sorcha Fall is closer to your line of thinking than mine, friend. I prefer dealing with provable facts and cogent analysis.

[Rocky_Shorz]

how long have we been looking at this?

the plates hold energy like a capacitor, the energy can enter the plates from any location, the ring of fire is the most common release...

until the sun settles down it will be quite a ride, for all of us...

[Rocky_Shorz]

“The United States apparently possesses an "earthquake weapon" that set off the catastrophic quake in Haiti and killed 200,000 innocents. Don't believe it's true? Just ask Hugo Chavez.

Citing an alleged report from Russia's Northern Fleet, the Venezuelan strongman's state mouthpiece ViVe TV shot out a press release saying the 7.0 magnitude Haiti quake was caused by a U.S. test of an experimental shockwave system that can also create "weather anomalies to cause floods, droughts and hurricanes."

The station's Web site added that the U.S. government's HAARP program, an atmospheric research facility in Alaska (and frequent subject of conspiracy theories), was also to blame for a Jan. 9 quake in Eureka, Calif., and may have been behind the 7.8-magnitude quake in China that killed nearly 90,000 people in 2008...

I don't see much difference, other than this was out long before Fulford's latest...

[Zook]

Posted by Rocky_Shorz (here)
how long have we been looking at this?

the plates hold energy like a capacitor, the energy can enter the plates from any location, the ring of fire is the most common release...

until the sun settles down it will be quite a ride, for all of us...

Conjecture and assertions are poor substitutes for facts and rational analysis. The HAARP time signature is a fact. The Sendai EQ time signature is a fact. Where is your fact that a "massive Solar storm" (e.g. CME??) hit the Earth; and if so, where is the time signature for that event?

[Rocky_Shorz]

some times I forget this is a conspiracy website, I'll let all of you get back to what you were doing...

but in case you are curious...

Recent activity

The geomagnetic field was quiet to active on March 7. The CME observed on March 3 was absorbed into the solar wind with weak effects observed on March 6 and stronger effects on March 7 as the interplanetary magnetic field was predominantly southwards.

Solar flux measured at 17h UTC on 2.8 GHz was 151.9 (the observation at 20h could not be used because of the strong influence from the M3.7 LDE - increasing 62.2 over the last solar rotation and a new high for cycle 24). The planetary A index was 10 (STAR Ap - based on the mean of three hour interval ap indices: 9.8). Three hour interval K indices: 21023243 (planetary), 22133232 (Boulder).

The background x-ray flux is at the class C2 level.

At midnight UTC the visible solar disk had 10 spotted regions.

Region 11164 finally began to produce M flares. A major proton flare is possible before the region rotates over the northwest limb. Flares: M1.2/1F at 05:13, M1.4/1F at 08:05, M1.8 at 09:20, C4.9 at 10:21, long duration M3.7 event peaking at 20:12 (with an associated strong type II radio sweep and a very fast full halo CME) UTC. The latter event was a minor proton flare as well.
Region 11165 decayed slowly and was quiet. Observe that NOAA/SWPC has included S891 in this region.
Region 11166 began to develop again and has doubled its spot number in one day. A major flare is possible. Flares: long duration M1.9 event (associated with a partial halo CME) peaking at 14:30 UTC
Region 11167 decayed slowly and could soon become spotless.
Region 11169 developed slowly and could produce C flares.

Spotted regions not numbered by NOAA/SWPC:
[S891] This region emerged in the southwest quadrant on March 3 and developed slowly the first days. Rapid development was observed on March 6 with many new spots emerging and at least 2 magnetic delta structures forming. On March 7 most of the spots merged into two large penumbrae. The trailing penumbra is very complex with a strong magnetic delta structure. A major flare is possible. Location at midnight: S17W82. Flares: C3.0 at 02:12, C5.0 at 04:39, C3.6 at 07:18, M1.5 at 07:54, C5.1 at 16:09, C7.6 at 18:23, M1.5 at 21:50 UTC.
[S896] Spots emerged in the northeast quadrant, just north of region 11166, on March 6. No significant changes were observed on March 7. Location at midnight: N16E09.
[S897] This region emerged on March 7 in the southwest quadrant. Location at midnight: S26W53
[S898] A tiny spot emerged in the southeast quadrant on March 7. Location at midnight: S13E37
[S899] A new region emerged in the northern hemisphere near the central meridian on March 7. Location at midnight: N19W04

Early on March 8 region S891 produced an M1.3/1N flare at 02:29 while a spotless plage region near the southeast limb was the source of a long duration M1.5 event (which was associated with a CME off the east limb) peaking at 03:58 UTC.

Minor update added at 11:05 UTC on March 8: Region S891 at the southwest limb produced a major M5.3 flare at 10:44 UTC. At this time no increase in the proton levels has been observed.

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs)

March 5-6: No obviously Earth directed CMEs were observed in LASCO and STEREO imagery.
March 7: A partial halo CME was observed following a long duration (LDE) event in region 11166. This CME could reach Earth on March 9/10, however, it will very likely be overtaken by the very fast CME produced by the M3.7 LDE in region 11164 late in the day. This CME could reach Earth on March 9 and cause minor to severe geomagnetic storming.

Propagation

Long distance low and medium frequency (below 2 MHz) propagation along paths north of due west over high and upper middle latitudes is poor. Propagation on long distance northeast-southwest paths is poor.
Forecast

The geomagnetic field is expected to be quiet to unsettled on March 8. A CME will likely arrive on March 9 and cause unsettled to major storm conditions, possibly with severe storming, that day and on March 10

Capacitor loaded...

March 9th - X-FLARE: Earth-orbiting satellites have just detected an impulsive X1-class solar flare. Stay tuned for analysis.

Capacitor overloaded...

in the Atlantic releases are more common through volcanoes like in Iceland...

[Hervé]

Some food for the incredules and for comparison with my post above; here is another set of seismograms from 1985. That is, recorded way before HAARP array went on line (started operating, officially, in 1994).

The above diagram shows the ground displacement recorded at a strong-motion seismometer
that was located directly above the part of a fault that ruptured during the 1985 Mw = 8.1, Michaocan, Mexico earthquake.

As you probably can see, there is a release build up to a maximum release and a dying down. This was directly above the epicenter, hence not a segregation between P waves and S waves. The Hokkaido station is in a similar set of conditions -- not too far from the epicenter.

For the distinction between these types of waves (one travelling faster than the other) see below:

The figure above is the seismogram of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
recorded at a seismograph in Kongsberg, Norway, 8400 km (about 5,200 miles) away.

For a cool primer on all this stuff, check out this site:

http://www.thetech.org/exhibits_even...akes/overview/

[Rocky_Shorz]

HAARP is many different instruments for measuring...

The line integral of plasma density (electrons/m3) is termed total electron content (electrons/m2), or TEC. A plasma reduces the speed of a radio signal traveling through it, more so the denser it is and more so the lower the radio frequency. This signal delay introduces error in measurements made by the Global Positioning System (GPS). To permit correction, GPS satellites transmit on two frequencies. The difference in range measured on the two frequencies by sophisticated GPS receivers provides a measurement of TEC and permits correction.

The chart below contains (in color) a 36-hour plot of TEC obtained from measurements on paths between such a receiver located at HAARP's Gakona field site and GPS satellites 45° or more above the horizon. Usually 3 or 4 such satellites are in view, at somewhat different longitudes (and, therefore, local times). The data may be displayed as a function of either Universal Time (UT) or local time at each ray path's penetration point (PP) with the ionospheric F layer at 350 km altitude. Generally greater values of TEC are encountered in the daytime than at night. Shorter-term variations occur during periods of ionospheric disturbance. Different TEC values at the same PP local time were obtained at slightly different UTs and/or latitudes. Thus multiple traces in the local-time display may indicate changing ionospheric conditions as well as spatial gradients. The PP latitudes are plotted beneath the TEC plot. For the GPS PP latitudes spanned (those clustered near 60°), the dashed black curves represent TEC estimates employed for ionospheric correction by single-frequency receivers, employing model coefficients transmitted from the GPS satellites.

Traces of slant TEC along paths to individual GPS satellites also are available. The chart below contains those measurements converted to "slab-equivalent" vertical TEC, ignoring spatial gradients and taking the effective ionospheric height to be 350 km. It also shows rapid scans of TEC over Alaska obtained from measurements along slant paths to lower-altitude satellites. These scans (solid black) often reveal substantial latitudinal gradients in TEC over Alaska.

http://maestro.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/ashtech/tec.cgi


compare that to STEREO

[Zook]

Posted by Rocky_Shorz (here)
some times I forget this is a conspiracy website, I'll let all of you get back to what you were doing...
but in case you are curious...

Of course, to keep things in balance, mainstream media is a conspiracy broadband ... so when you get back to it, Rockers, maybe you can use the information you've found here as an anchor to reality.

Recent activity
The geomagnetic field was quiet to active on March 7. The CME observed on March 3 was absorbed into the solar wind with weak effects observed on March 6 and stronger effects on March 7 as the interplanetary magnetic field was predominantly southwards.
[...]
The geomagnetic field is expected to be quiet to unsettled on March 8. A CME will likely arrive on March 9 and cause unsettled to major storm conditions, possibly with severe storming, that day and on March 10

Capacitor loaded...
March 9th - X-FLARE: Earth-orbiting satellites have just detected an impulsive X1-class solar flare. Stay tuned for analysis.
Capacitor overloaded...
in the Atlantic releases are more common through volcanoes like in Iceland...
[...]

"A CME will likely arrive on March 9 and cause unsettled to major storm conditions, possibly with severe storming"

Please don't confuse unsettled to major storm conditions and severe storming ... with a Mag 9.0 earthquake. The report refers to events such as Aurora Borealis and the sort. There has been no evidence that I am aware of where CMEs have ever caused major Earthquakes (or even minor ones). If you have such evidence, please post it directly. Meandering about the issue with indirect arguments that offer little in the way of support to the thesis at hand, namely, your argument that CMEs were the major causal factors for the Sendai EQ of March 11, 2011 ... only creates noise and confusion. Thank you.

[Arrowwind]

Fulford tells of HAARP induced earthquated that reflect manipulative timing, and were centered on Nuclear reactors in Japan..

I have to ask, could it be that two or three earthquakes were required to make a sufficient nuclear accident like we are seeing today?
Now this report preceded the event we just had on march 11


https://youtube.com/watch?v=

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cRNyte66LTQ

=1

[Fred259]

Yes Zook, no meandering allowed !…It’s impressive watching this, its 01.00GMT will we get a decision tonight do you think.?

However why is he using the F layer and 350km rather than the D layer and 75km approx. It was 05.46 GMT / 14.46 local time so should it not be the D layer, would this make a difference? That graph looks frightening….it was about 05.30 GMT ?

[Hervé]

An even closer match to Hokkaido's set of conditions:



The above diagram shows the ground displacement observed near Tucson, Arizona, caused by an earthquake in southwestern Texas. The top panel shows the vibrations measured using a broad-band seismometer, the middle panel shows the vibrations as they would be detected by the long-period sensor, and the bottom panel the vibrations that would be sensed by a short-period sensor (scaled by a factor of 10 so we can see them better). The displacements are shown in microns, which are 1x10^-6 meters.

As anyone can see, something bizarre between the two sets.

While at it, and about "theories," why is the MSM showing that:

when what actually occured is this:

[nomadguy]

[Rocky_Shorz]

Posted by Zook (here)

Posted by Rocky_Shorz (here)
some times I forget this is a conspiracy website, I'll let all of you get back to what you were doing...
but in case you are curious...

Of course, to keep things in balance, mainstream media is a conspiracy broadband ... so when you get back to it, Rockers, maybe you can use the information you've found here as an anchor to reality.

Recent activity
The geomagnetic field was quiet to active on March 7. The CME observed on March 3 was absorbed into the solar wind with weak effects observed on March 6 and stronger effects on March 7 as the interplanetary magnetic field was predominantly southwards.
[...]
The geomagnetic field is expected to be quiet to unsettled on March 8. A CME will likely arrive on March 9 and cause unsettled to major storm conditions, possibly with severe storming, that day and on March 10

Capacitor loaded...
March 9th - X-FLARE: Earth-orbiting satellites have just detected an impulsive X1-class solar flare. Stay tuned for analysis.
Capacitor overloaded...
in the Atlantic releases are more common through volcanoes like in Iceland...
[...]

"A CME will likely arrive on March 9 and cause unsettled to major storm conditions, possibly with severe storming"

Please don't confuse unsettled to major storm conditions and severe storming ... with a Mag 9.0 earthquake. The report refers to events such as Aurora Borealis and the sort. There has been no evidence that I am aware of where CMEs have ever caused major Earthquakes (or even minor ones). If you have such evidence, please post it directly. Meandering about the issue with indirect arguments that offer little in the way of support to the thesis at hand, namely, your argument that CMEs were the major causal factors for the Sendai EQ of March 11, 2011 ... only creates noise and confusion. Thank you.

well Zook,

this is what Tesla was working on, so yes a little far fetching for most minds to wrap around, but not yours...