NSA Who Watches the Watchers

[Carmody]

Since psychic skills are 'out of time' and someone had to read a given paper or whatnot..and THINK about exactly how to redact, and what to redact..this means it is possible to get back into that moment and divine the missing text.

[Normalguy31]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Why do you assume they will be hostile to you?

I dunno ... I did not offer a sacrifice of my children and I am fresh outta lambs, goats or other stand ins.

:flock

Most suggest (as you seem to have) the Enki group is the less "friendly" towards humans.

While I understand the whole "good/bad" thing is a matter of degree and relativity ... based on what information is available ... why would I assume they would *not* be hostile (to me, mine or mankind in general)?

I would read between the lines ... but m'lord ... you only gave me a "one liner"

Thanks for your response regardless.

When did I suggest anything about them being friendly or not?

Yeah I got the complete opposite from that. What makes you think the Enki group is coming back? To help? Or will I get no definitive answer from you?

[Calz]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Why do you assume they will be hostile to you?

I dunno ... I did not offer a sacrifice of my children and I am fresh outta lambs, goats or other stand ins.



Most suggest (as you seem to have) the Enki group is the less "friendly" towards humans.

While I understand the whole "good/bad" thing is a matter of degree and relativity ... based on what information is available ... why would I assume they would *not* be hostile (to me, mine or mankind in general)?

I would read between the lines ... but m'lord ... you only gave me a "one liner"

Thanks for your response regardless.

When did I suggest anything about them being friendly or not?

From Anunnaki thread:

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by AuCo (here)

Enki and Enlil factions? According to Laurence Gardner (The Origin of God) Enlil seems to be the model of what some of us call God. That seems to be in reverse as Enki looks to have been the good guy? Comments Bill?

Enlil is yahweh/jehovah.
That being the case, Enki is satan.
Remembering that satan means the adversary.

In a literal sense I guess you are simply stating that satan (Enki) is the adversary to yahweh (Enlil).

Perhaps I made an assumption or two based on other information regarding the two factions.

A few members are strongly hinting at a major event regarding this topic is upon us.

In my simple Nuggeteese Speek I am trying to prod for something more in lines with "news you can use".

[Carmody]

Sitchin and others put forward the idea that Enki created the 'god' system, and moved it into the monotheistic state for all humans....and then Enlil took it over and made it the evil thing that it is today. The gods(plural) part of the bible still shows the origins of this. Enki apprently stuck his nose into it every now and then.

Then we go down to the Sumerian layer and get into that, with the fully blown gods and annunaki considerations.

Many times I think that Islam is an attempt by Enlil to play his hand at such creations as Enki did with Judaism.

I do recall the issue of circumcising at the exact date of 8 days into the male child's life.

[Calz]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Sitchin and others put forward the idea that Enki created the 'god' system, and moved it into the monotheistic state for all humans....and then Enlil took it over and made it the evil thing that it is today. The gods(plural) part of the bible still shows the origins of this. Enki apprently stuck his nose into it every now and then.

Then we go down to the Sumerian layer and get into that, with the fully blown gods and annunaki considerations.

Many times I think that Islam is an attempt by Enlil to play his hand at such creations as Enki did with Judaism.

I do recall the issue of circumcising at the exact date of 8 days into the male child's life.

Okay but did not Stitchin admit to "channeling" the anunnaki for some of his material?

The victors write the "history books."

Book of Enoch paints a different picture than the tablets (and stitchin's interpretation). Not a black and white issue as no doubt there are truths and "grey matter" in each.

Thanks for your input Carmody.

[TimelessDimensions]

Posted by Levent tonga (here)

Posted by TimelessDimensions (here)
It's not fun to spoil a surprise is it now?

Let me make my day

Of course you are always free to jump time-lines and not experience any of the "collective karma",
Here I speak of one of the most probable time-lines within the collective subconscious at this present moment.

[Mad Hatter]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Sitchin and others put forward the idea that Enki created the 'god' system, and moved it into the monotheistic state for all humans....and then Enlil took it over and made it the evil thing that it is today.

So this makes Satan the nice guy.?..!!

[Calz]

Posted by Mad Hatter (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
Sitchin and others put forward the idea that Enki created the 'god' system, and moved it into the monotheistic state for all humans....and then Enlil took it over and made it the evil thing that it is today.

So this makes Satan the nice guy.?..!!

Jury is out for the moment ... stay tuned ...

Moved a couple of posts over to Bill's Anunnaki thread ... so we will see if some people are willing to come forward with a bit more elaboration than has been presented thus far.

Let me be clear ... I appreciate those coming forward

Does not mean I or anyone need to accept anything ... but we all should appreciate the opportunity to reflect on what they say ...

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by Mad Hatter (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
Sitchin and others put forward the idea that Enki created the 'god' system, and moved it into the monotheistic state for all humans....and then Enlil took it over and made it the evil thing that it is today.

So this makes Satan the nice guy.?..!!

Who told you he was bad?
The followers of jehovah?

[Carmody]

Without knowing or hearing of any of this more 'modern' stuff... as an ignorant 13 year old, the conclusion that I came to is that: Satan appeared to be a semi-decent dude and was responsible for giving mankind thought, realization, and advancement (logical discourse) ..and it was right in the bible. Some other bad bits, yes. Obvious.

According to what I could understand about archeological record and attempting to correlate and fit, God and satan were probably intelligent reptiles here to teach humankind....something. This, I concluded at the age of 13 in ....1977. And that the biblical god (part uno) appeared to be more than a bit of an ass.

Don't know if that was the correct analysis, but that is what logic applied to scientific potential and record....and biblical record ...were saying to me at that time.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Without knowing or hearing of any of this more 'modern' stuff... as an ignorant 13 year old, the conclusion that I came to is that: Satan appeared to be a semi-decent dude and was responsible for giving mankind thought, realization, and advancement (logical discourse) ..and it was right in the bible. Some other bad bits, yes. Obvious.

According to what I could understand about archeological record and attempting to correlate and fit, God and satan were probably intelligent reptiles here to teach humankind....something. This, I concluded at the age of 13 in ....1977. And that the biblical god (part uno) appeared to be more than a bit of an ass.

Don't know if that was the correct analysis, but that is what logic applied to scientific potential and record....and biblical record ...were saying to me at that time.

Yours is a better extrapolation than the religions will give.

[Calz]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Without knowing or hearing of any of this more 'modern' stuff... as an ignorant 13 year old, the conclusion that I came to is that: Satan appeared to be a semi-decent dude and was responsible for giving mankind thought, realization, and advancement (logical discourse) ..and it was right in the bible. Some other bad bits, yes. Obvious.

According to what I could understand about archeological record and attempting to correlate and fit, God and satan were probably intelligent reptiles here to teach humankind....something. This, I concluded at the age of 13 in ....1977. And that the biblical god (part uno) appeared to be more than a bit of an ass.

Don't know if that was the correct analysis, but that is what logic applied to scientific potential and record....and biblical record ...were saying to me at that time.

Well this is gettin pretty damn interesting

1977 ... wow ... way ahead of me my friend as at the time all I was interested in was the ol' "drugs, sex and rock n roll".

(... light on the drugs ... but ... well you know ...)

[Carmody]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
Without knowing or hearing of any of this more 'modern' stuff... as an ignorant 13 year old, the conclusion that I came to is that: Satan appeared to be a semi-decent dude and was responsible for giving mankind thought, realization, and advancement (logical discourse) ..and it was right in the bible. Some other bad bits, yes. Obvious.

According to what I could understand about archeological record and attempting to correlate and fit, God and satan were probably intelligent reptiles here to teach humankind....something. This, I concluded at the age of 13 in ....1977. And that the biblical god (part uno) appeared to be more than a bit of an ass.

Don't know if that was the correct analysis, but that is what logic applied to scientific potential and record....and biblical record ...were saying to me at that time.

Well this is gettin pretty damn interesting

1977 ... wow ... way ahead of me my friend as at the time all I was interested in was the ol' "drugs, sex and rock n roll".

(... light on the drugs ... but ... well you know ...)

When I was 13, I was told by the conveyor of 'truth' ...meaning sitting down and 'reading the archeological record'.... that reptiles were here long before the conversion to a mammalian environment and occupation.

The time periods were bandied about regrading the potential time frames that are required for a mechanical edifice that is organic and capable of supporting intelligence..to come to some sort of fruition, and then move to higher levels of civilization, and onward and upward..

Within the time frames for the record... and how fast this mammalian creature called man was advancing..it seemed as if there was room for reptilians to do the same thing AND come to the point that they leave this sphere of influence..and also have the technological capacity to remove any record of their influence or existence.

Like renting a house and then cleaning up before you leave. Leave it for the next guest.

Millions of years would have been available to them, at the minimum. This is the logic that COULD be applied to the record, with regard to helping explain what was in the bible.

I was test fitting potential scenarios, and that is what I concluded was a likely or possible situation. Who knows. This, with NO spiritual or otherworldly aspects added in. Just simple atheist type mentality added in to try and explain what was in the bible according to science and the record.

I did not permanently hold that view and don't to this day. Like everyone else in this human skin, I really don't know.