+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 52

Thread: Fukushima: Major act of deliberate war?

  1. Link to Post #1
    Wales Deactivated
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    1,497
    Thanks
    7,840
    Thanked 6,776 times in 1,313 posts

    Default Fukushima: Major act of deliberate war?

    Jim Stone presents substantial evidence that the Japanese earthquake was a combination of (1) a much smaller, perhaps natural inland quake, (2) a tsunamai caused by a nuclear detonation in the ocean trench off the Japanese short, and (3) the elaborate and deliberate destruction of the Fukushima nuclear power plants. Most likely this was an Israel operation, perhaps intended to stop Japan from refining uranium for Iran.

    From Jim Stone's Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?:

    ================ Begin Quote ==============

    I honestly believe Japan is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes sense.
    1. Japan offers to enrich uranium for Israel's GREAT SATAN, Iran
    2. Immediately, Israel sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, and one of them succeeds in getting a security contract at a Japanese nuclear facility. 4 months later the Dimona Dozen shows up, and under the cover of a security contract gets unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus, install real cameras outside the facility, and functional poorly disguised nuke cameras inside the facility. In addition to this, they install an unauthorized data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus. (they admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page)
    3. After installing Stuxnet and the nukes they scram
    4. Israel waits for one of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide cover for a tsunami bomb, and they already have it at the bottom of the Japan trench. VLF communications are established with the bomb to penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic reading from Japan. 6.67 in progress, BOOM. (new evidence shows the quake most likely was not natural)
    5. Tsunami comes in, swamps stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed from legitimate cameras security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they can to counteract measures taken by the employees at fukushima, who are unaware an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy
    6. Israeli Prime Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering help to Iran, and ya know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the coast of Japan, and we are going to set those off and destroy your coastal cities if you do not forget that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for tsunami effects. AND NOW we are going to make your people DEMAND you move away from nuclear power so you can NEVER threaten us like that again. We are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you are going to go along with whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!
    7. David and his pals close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data link they admitted to installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them down while the virus keeps control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is going on even though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide plausibility, they set off planted nukes and blow the place sky high.
    And even if the quake was real, there are nukes that can reach an 8.4. Close enough. Though I have yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:
    1. I got the real seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the triangulated true epicenter being a little higher) which would get noticed but not feared in quake ridden Japan.
    2. Numerous referenced sources prove Stuxnet really was written by Israel
    3. Japan really did offer to enrich Uranium for Iran, and Israel has been documented to have attempted to destroy the reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing to Iran's nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as Iran. Israel would want them taken out.
    4. It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom
    5. Reactor 4 had been defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? the fuel pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is building 7, PERIOD. Why did an explosion there happen that was so severe it blew the outer containment walls (4 feet thick) and inner containment walls that were much thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?
    6. The Japanese government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0. There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan speaks a word of what went on, there should be no reason for Japan to go along with this other than a continued threat.
    Is it not interesting this "quake" reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which would be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?
    ================= End Quote ===============



    [Mod-edit: With ROMANWKT's permission, I rewrote the above in order to provide more focus and information on what may be one of the major "false flag" (blaming nature this time) events of our time. See also Amzer Zo's Post #20 below for another good summary of Jim Stone's analysis of the Japanese Earthquake and Fukushima. This is very important stuff in my estimation. -Paul.]


    THIS WAS WRITTEN BY PAUL, THANK YOU Regards Roman
    Last edited by ROMANWKT; 15th June 2011 at 13:38.

  2. The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to ROMANWKT For This Post:

    astrid (7th June 2011), Calz (14th June 2011), Cjay (4th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), dan i el (4th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Eligos (15th June 2011), eva08 (14th June 2011), Fred259 (14th June 2011), golden lady (7th June 2011), Hervé (16th June 2011), Kimberley (4th June 2011), Leon (29th March 2012), loveandgratitude (4th June 2011), mab777 (7th June 2011), Mad Hatter (4th June 2011), Maia Gabrial (6th June 2011), Martin (14th June 2011), Muzz (14th June 2011), NancyV (7th June 2011), Nasu (7th June 2011), Pagan (14th June 2011), phillipbbg (14th June 2011), Realeyes (5th June 2011), s3nru (7th June 2011), seko (7th June 2011), shadowstalker (15th June 2011), Shikasta (12th June 2011), silverchimes (4th June 2011), sllim11 (14th June 2011), Snowbird (5th June 2011), syrwong (6th June 2011), Teakai (5th June 2011), ThePythonicCow (4th June 2011), Tony (14th June 2011), Trail (5th June 2011), winnasboy (5th June 2011), yaksuit (5th June 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member Kimberley's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    7,329
    Thanked 12,752 times in 1,912 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage a must read

    Yes This is a very interesting article... I agree a must read. Hmmmm???
    Much love to us ALL!!

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kimberley For This Post:

    Realeyes (5th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Posts
    223
    Thanks
    11,712
    Thanked 731 times in 198 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Roman, Thank You abundantly for your caring, insight and time to wake up the people! These games need to come to an end and peace and unconditional love need to prevail, I hope sooner than later. I am in complete alignment with your theory! I am not a scientist, but I never did buy the b.s about 911, I saw it happing on the television and I made the comment that the towers looked like a demolition in the movies. Never made sense that we were supposedly warned and did NOTHING to prevent this "staged disaster". The so called " top of the pyramid" rulers/controllers of this planet need to be called on their ego maniacal "games of destruction". My sympathy to those people of Japan for this man made unnecessary suffering imploded upon them. It is absolutely nauseating. I believe that we need higher intervention asap in this world from a higher spiritual vibrational folks. Our world is in such a supersonic downward death spiral. It is time to take the blindfolds off to see the Truth and how we are being manipulated into not using our common sense and intelligence. Read folks! Quit watching the distractions of television, Media news, too many sports, reality junk shows, celebrity gossip shows, ect. Roman, you are close to being right on about the "so called earthquake and tsunami of Japan". Keep up the great work and I am so grateful to you for spreading/communicating your findings, Thanks again! jjjones

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jjjones For This Post:

    crosby (7th June 2011), Maia Gabrial (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Canada Avalon Member Czarek's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th October 2010
    Location
    ONTARIO
    Posts
    349
    Thanks
    1,131
    Thanked 1,395 times in 278 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    I'm going to confirm this info link you've provided with what I heard and saw at a Radiation Safety Conference I attended early May. This is my post from May13:

    I just got back from a week of conference on radiation issues. Situation in Japan has been presented by few speakers (big fish in radiation protection industry) over a period of 3 hours. To present the data shown (or lack of it) would take some time for me to gather but I will comment on one very imporant issue.

    The analysis of what is coming out from those plants resulted in some emissions that are UNKNOWN to the present nuclear industry. This was a very brief statement stated by a head of a major player in radiation protection industry. It was literally 2 sentences and a quick screen showing spectral analysis. I sat far away from the screen but I know that the isotope/(s) had energy higher than 660keV of Cs137. I was amazed and stunned that every one just ignored that statement and the analysis presented. They only allowed 2 questions at the end and unfortunately I didn't make the cut.

  8. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Czarek For This Post:

    9eagle9 (6th June 2011), Calz (14th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Muzz (14th June 2011), Nasu (7th June 2011), Operator (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011), tessie999 (6th June 2011), witchy1 (5th June 2011)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Australia Avalon Member Cjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2011
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,391
    Thanks
    5,142
    Thanked 4,407 times in 1,148 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    I have sent Jim Stone's link to a friend of a friend who holds a very senior position at one of the largest nuclear power facilities in USA, asking for comments. I will understand if I never get a reply but if I do, I will share it here.

    - EDIT -

    I was surprised to receive a reply so quickly.

    Quote Oh yeah he’s told me about that ages ago, their team who went there have the same findings
    - EDIT 2 -

    Lead went cold, like a freezer door slammed in my face.

    Quote whatever he knows it’s not something for outsiders like me or you to know, so stop being nosey and just mind your own business..he’s got the final report of their investigation and I don’t have the right nor you to meddle...so go do something useful for yourself..okie dokie?
    Insulting and creepy... or am I being paranoid? It certainly made my hair stand up.
    Last edited by Cjay; 5th June 2011 at 12:51.

  10. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Cjay For This Post:

    Calz (14th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Hervé (14th June 2011), Holly Lindin (14th June 2011), Maia Gabrial (14th June 2011), Martin (5th June 2011), Muzz (14th June 2011), Nasu (7th June 2011), Pagan (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011), sllim11 (14th June 2011), tessie999 (6th June 2011), ThePythonicCow (5th June 2011), winnasboy (5th June 2011), witchy1 (5th June 2011)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Netherlands Avalon Member Trail's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Posts
    335
    Thanks
    1,269
    Thanked 1,789 times in 282 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Guess what? I've emailed Arnie & Maggie Gundersen to please review http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima.html !!!

    I so hope he does. Im sure he can´t really take such a strong position in public as Jim does, but i still like to know Arnie is having all the perspectives he can get..
    Each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand mediocre minds appointed to guard the past. ~Maurice Maeterlinck
    Its a rare person who wants to hear what he doesn’t want to hear. – Dick Cavett

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Trail For This Post:

    Dawn (30th March 2012), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member Snowbird's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2010
    Location
    The CORPORATION of the United States of America
    Posts
    1,777
    Thanks
    3,823
    Thanked 4,500 times in 1,082 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Roman, thank you for this incredible report. You are a very brave man.

    Anyone, did you get the impression from this report that the earthquake itself was induced or was it a natural occurrence? In other words, were both the quake and the tsunami forced on Japan simultaneously?
    We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.
    Plato

    Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
    Martin Luther King, Jr.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Snowbird For This Post:

    Maia Gabrial (7th June 2011), Nasu (7th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011)

  15. Link to Post #8
    New Zealand Avalon Member witchy1's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th September 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,885
    Thanks
    3,378
    Thanked 5,765 times in 1,189 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    "I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened. Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not damage a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter". I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it. "


    I wonder what Skid would say about this as he was on the ground around there?

    If this is true, WOW
    Last edited by witchy1; 5th June 2011 at 14:03.

  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to witchy1 For This Post:

    astrid (7th June 2011), Calz (14th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Fred259 (14th June 2011), loveandgratitude (14th June 2011), Maia Gabrial (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011), s3nru (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Australia Avalon Member Cjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2011
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,391
    Thanks
    5,142
    Thanked 4,407 times in 1,148 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Trail, good luck getting a detailed critique from Arnie & Maggie Gundersen. I will be very surprised if you get further than I did with my inquiries.

    Regarding the earthquake damage - or lack of it... I have a good friend who lives in Ibaraki - roughly half way between Tokyo and Sendai. When the big quake hit, he could not go online because the power went off, so he asked me to search online. Within seconds, I was relaying to him what I saw of the Tsunamis on a live news feed. He was chatting with me via his iPhone using Chikka. He told me that was by far the biggest quake he has felt during his 15 years in Japan. He did not see any major devestation such as collapsed multi-story buildings. In the weeks that followed, travel was near impossible, so he only saw what the rest of us saw either on TV or Internet news reports and YouTube videos, mostly of the tsunamis and the unfolding Fukushima crisis.

    I coined the term "Fuku2" after the first explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant even though it wasn't reactor 2 that blew up. We used that term in all of our subsequent conversations about the nuclear power plant.

    In the first month or more after the big quake, he felt dozens of aftershocks every day, many of them bigger than 6.0 on the Richter scale. I think the aftershocks "rattled" his nerves more than the first big quake because of several weeks of sleep deprivation, endless running outside during each quake, severe food shortages and the rumours of another big quake being likely.

    He has since been able to travel to Tokyo and he has not reported any of the type of damage we would expect from a magnitude 9.1 earthquake.

  18. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Cjay For This Post:

    Calz (14th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Maia Gabrial (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (5th June 2011), seko (7th June 2011), tessie999 (6th June 2011), Trail (5th June 2011)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Greece Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th April 2010
    Location
    Glasgow Scotland
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,237
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 1,481 times in 519 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    The scarry thing is that the difference in a 9.0 EQ and anything else we have seen is so big ... that noone living today has ever felt it. I dont think the Japanese people can realize or not if the EQ was that big. Indeed it took minutes to stop but was it a 9.0??

    The videos we see from the EQ inside the offices are similar to other smaller we have seen the last years. Also with a 9.0 should there be buildings destroyed in Tokyo or in the area of fukusima prior to the tsunami? Also how can the liquafication of the earth ... (remember how the earth was moving for minutes ? like floating...)

    i cant verify anything ofc but it felt that these Questions he posted were true. This are so messed up atm globaly and we have so much disinfo coming from everywhere that its really hard to make a decision.

    SKI we would really love your take as you lived through the quake. Was it 1000X times stronger that the 6.0-7.0 ones we had the last years?

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Etherios For This Post:

    Maia Gabrial (14th June 2011), Martin (5th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Hong Kong Avalon Member syrwong's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Age
    70
    Posts
    844
    Thanks
    2,059
    Thanked 5,020 times in 762 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    I made a post on the General discussion forum after reading Jim Stone's article. No one seemed to be interested as I got no replies. This is very disturbing, for I think the obvious absence of quake damage is the clearest proof that the 311 Quake was a conspiracy that had evaded investigation. On TV we were fed with videos of tsunami destruction repeatedly, and no one on earth seemed to suspect why there were not other horrific sights. Is this a mind control of the grandest kind?

    It did occur in my mind but I thought the epicenter was far away in the ocean. Now I learned from Stone that it was just 38 miles from Sendai. Then I found it out with some difficulty that the US Geographic Survey put the distance to be 80 miles. I think it was very hard that Sendai had not become a pile of ruins given the proximity, regardless of the Japanese quake proof technology in the buildings.

    Quite disturbing, and very worrying too, because this has not aroused the interest and attention of the vigilant Avalonians.
    I

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to syrwong For This Post:

    alxz (11th June 2011), Calz (14th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Hervé (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member stegosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Age
    40
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 170 times in 50 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    I think a big EQ DID hit Japan, but I will say it seems like the nuclear situation, especially after reading this article, has been manufactured.

    Here is why I think a big EQ did hit Japan:

    1) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-nasa-science/
    Data from high-precision GPS instruments show that parts of Japan shifted by as much as 13 feet (4 meters) as the fault plates lurched due to the earthquake. This allowed scientists to calculate how much Earth's overall mass distribution had shifted and thus how much the wobble was affected.

    It takes an incredible amount of energy to displace 4 meters along a fault plane - but this amount of energy can occur in a MW 6.5 EQ.

    Here's the interesting thing here though: There was a study published in 1994 that looked at the relationship between things like Magnitude, rupture length, rupture area and surface displacement. I don't know if I can post the original article, but here is the reference: New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length,
    Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement by Donald L. Wells and Kevin J. Coppersmith. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002, August 1994

    Anyways, the study found that 4 meters of displacement has been achieved with EQ as small as 6.5 or so. The smallest known displacement with a magnitude 8 EQ was closer to 9 meters. So if the largest observed displacement was only 4 meters, it stands to reason that a MW 9 did not hit Japan. A quick word about Japan: The people and government have invested a lot of money into understanding their tectonic environment, including installation of the most accurate GPS system in the world. Geologists love studying here because it's possible to see how much the islands are moving, in what direction. Heck, the system is so detailed it can actually sense very slight tilting of the Island when mountainous regions experience heavy snow fall. What's my point? The 4 meters of offset are probably the largest that occurred anywhere on the island, and if there were bigger displacements, the system would have measured it, even if it happened in the most rugged, unpopulated terrain.

    After looking at some known data on MW and surface displacements, I'd say it's very possible that something much smaller than a MW 9.0 hit Japan. Especially considering the smallest displacement observed in that study I read associated with a MW 8 EQ was 8-9 meters.

    I think Jim is onto something here.... Just though I'd try to share some geologic insights since I am a geologist after all :-)

  24. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to stegosaur For This Post:

    Calz (14th June 2011), crosby (7th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), kudzy (14th June 2011), Revere (15th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), s3nru (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011), sllim11 (14th June 2011), syrwong (7th June 2011)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member Maia Gabrial's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th April 2011
    Location
    On the planet Sophia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    4,605
    Thanks
    15,747
    Thanked 17,168 times in 3,859 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Someone in Avalon said that there was no proof that there actually was an earthquake damage, just the tsunami damage....So, I'm wondering if this is part of the deception, too....?
    Maia

  26. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Maia Gabrial For This Post:

    alxz (11th June 2011), Fred259 (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    21st January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    418
    Thanks
    523
    Thanked 2,462 times in 393 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Interesting article. The best line is:

    "And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be.

    I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it."

    mm. okay, things get clearer. really makes the recent move of the japanese prime minister facing self-resignation over the 'Fukushima Incident' take in a new light. Problem, reaction, solution laid out nicely. We don't like your plan. Change of plans, install new leader. Mmm, yes, your plan will do quite nicely, since we made it up.

    Classic.

    Amidst all this, its still critical to keep going, keep going with the work of being. It still makes it pretty difficult to go about one's business and realize that most people are still snoozing. Thanks for those who continue to have the energy to work at it so fervently on these layers.

  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Artemesia For This Post:

    Calz (14th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), Maia Gabrial (7th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  29. Link to Post #15
    Hong Kong Avalon Member syrwong's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Age
    70
    Posts
    844
    Thanks
    2,059
    Thanked 5,020 times in 762 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Thank you for the expert opinion. This picture of some devastation, mainly debris, was in Onagawa, which was some 40 miles away from the epicenter. The buildings are standing. That confirms an Earthquake, but also of scale much less than 9.0. As a geologist, can you comment on Stone's assertion that a 9.0 would have damage the whole of Japan in various degrees?

    I am still amazed that Sendai, the place of many tsunami videos looked so normal as the tsunami approached. No one seemed to correlate the magnitude with the lack of damage. I also wonder, and please comment on this also, if many weather stations all over the world could easily detect the magnitude and the location with good accuracy. If so, what the hell is going on?

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to syrwong For This Post:

    Maia Gabrial (7th June 2011), Nasu (7th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  31. Link to Post #16
    Switzerland Avalon Member Nasu's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th April 2011
    Location
    Lost in the woods
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,479
    Thanks
    70,434
    Thanked 8,154 times in 1,207 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Great post Roman. Seems too cut and dried to just be Israel thwarting Iran's nuclear plans. I think there is a deeper game afoot. The evidence for a smaller quake seems to be everywhere and clear, the motive, less so...N

  32. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nasu For This Post:

    Maia Gabrial (7th June 2011), ROMANWKT (7th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011), ThePythonicCow (7th June 2011)

  33. Link to Post #17
    Avalon Member leavesoftrees's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2010
    Posts
    601
    Thanks
    4,392
    Thanked 3,663 times in 539 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    Quote Posted by Artemesia (here)
    Interesting article. The best line is:

    "And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be.

    I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it."
    why would Japan agree to enrich uranium for Iran?
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 14th June 2011 at 05:48. Reason: fix quote'ing

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to leavesoftrees For This Post:

    ROMANWKT (7th June 2011)

  35. Link to Post #18
    Avalon Member Maia Gabrial's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th April 2011
    Location
    On the planet Sophia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    4,605
    Thanks
    15,747
    Thanked 17,168 times in 3,859 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    I think people will keep digging until they find the truth. Enriching uranium may just be another cover story.
    Maia

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to Maia Gabrial For This Post:

    ROMANWKT (7th June 2011)

  37. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Member AlexanderLight's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd February 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    204
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked 1,221 times in 156 posts

    Default Re: Fukushima a false report a sabotage

    USA Threatened Japan with HAARP caused Earthquakes!

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AlexanderLight For This Post:

    loveandgratitude (14th June 2011), Maia Gabrial (14th June 2011), ROMANWKT (10th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011)

  39. Link to Post #20
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,068 times in 15,483 posts

    Default Re: The Horror of Fukushima

    Some more damning evidences from Jim Stone (http://jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima.html):

    Quote Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?

    This site has been all but delisted over this article, THE ONLY WAY THIS INFORMATION CAN GET OUT NOW IS BY YOU POSTING TO BLOGS, LINKING E-MAILS ECT. I permit ANYONE to set up a site mirror of the news section and run it as their own provided the wording remains the same and links are included. After getting one cell modem bricked by someone other than my service provider, I am taking my chances with another modem. Back up this site if you are thinking about it, it could be next. THIS SITE, WITH A DIFFERENT PROVIDER IS PAID FOR IN FULL for 627 more days and will not go down unless they take it down. If it goes down you have your answer as to why.
    I have now appeared on two radio programs, to hear me speak click here. Deanna Spingola has apologized for the rudeness of her co-host, who was an ambush to her and disrupted the program. She said "never again!" and has invited me to appear on her program again without him. Psy ops abound and he was obviously one! Due to the many good calls and my strong documentation I got through it well. However, In addition to the host, they also bricked cell modem 2 during the program, and woodpeckered my hard drive in an attempt to kill it. That is why I stopped giving links in the second half of the program, I was dead in the water but kept quiet about it. I accept her invitation to appear again, but there are two other programs to do first. It's a war folks!

    Easy read version
    __________________________________________________________________________________
    Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?
    Fukushima may in fact have been caused by an act of war under the cover of an environmental disaster.
    It took them three hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the light of only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out. Archive and POST!
    Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Updated Monday, June 13, 2011

    This is a massive report. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera. Then scroll down to the photos of the NON EXISTENT quake damage and seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story.

    NEW INFO: Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!
    HERE ARE THE LINKS: Ynet news... Inside Japan News Network...The New American...Rianovosti news...Hindustan Times...Zee News

    AND FOUR MONTHS LATER, THE DIMONA DOZEN SHOWED UP WITH A REALLY FANCY CAMERA!!

    This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima originally posted on Pink Tentacle to support it's claims.

    They are,
    1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event.

    2. Reactor 4 is building 7, demolished by explosives. Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. Because fuel rods only contain 20 percent fissionable material, they also cannot produce the "prompt criticality" "The most qualified nuclear engineer in the world" Arnie Gundersen has spoken of. I got to the bottom of the Arnie Gunderson story, and added the results of that investigation further down the page. He has been put on a pedastal and pumped up enormously by a press that wants a misleading story, all the while he is a despised outcast of the greater engineering community. The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible absent the use of an explosive device, and as a result the disaster at Fukushima is FAR FAR WORSE than ANYTHING Gundersen is willing to say. Gundersen is towing the line and hiding the true magnitude of what happened there because if it became widely known serious questions would be asked. When have you heard Gundersen talk about a totally missing reactor?
    Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona).

    3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick. Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design, but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade(reference is the included photos, it is obvious). It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast.

    4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons.The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope) Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into google images,(without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish its claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. Why this giant thing? note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes.

    . . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference.

    Due to the many positive e-mails about getting the truth out, rather than hold back I am going to put the original information back. It follows below.

    The quake was not what we were told.

    In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. This original seismic data is the smoking gun, however, I have something better. I finally suppressed the urge to vomit and analyzed the lies told by the USGS, and from them wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video. Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS.
    [...]
    Full article here and simplified version here.

    This one summarizes the cooking of the recorded data... how the hell did they managed to get a magnitude 9.1 out of it?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Japan EQ seism magnitudes.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	90.5 KB
ID:	8061
    Last edited by Hervé; 14th June 2011 at 23:16.

  40. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Calz (14th June 2011), Dawn (30th March 2012), eva08 (14th June 2011), ktlight (3rd September 2011), loveandgratitude (14th June 2011), seko (15th June 2011), ThePythonicCow (14th June 2011)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts