Planet X/Nibiru/Tyche/Hercolobus/Elenin

[Malachi]

oh, my God, not again...the large dark shadow is the shadow of the station's comm tower. the three guys are looking up to the Moon or the station's wind turbine whitch is in the same direction. the large white planet is the Moon. the smaller blue one is the Moon's reflecion on the lens. the "explosions" are lamps. what else? everithing he says is false.

just look it up on the wiki or anywhere on the internet, 5 minutes and you will know everything about the Neumayer Station. sorry, but this guy is out of his mind.

[KosmicKat]

My first thought was to check GMaps to see if I could see the orientation of the station from a satellite view. Surprise, surprise! at the co-ordinates given, (70°39'S, 08°15'W) there is ... nothing but ice! I would love to know more.

[Malachi]

Posted by KosmicKat (here)
My first thought was to check GMaps to see if I could see the orientation of the station from a satellite view. Surprise, surprise! at the co-ordinates given, (70°39'S, 08°15'W) there is ... nothing but ice! I would love to know more.

follow THIS LINK please.
if you have google earth, just click on the .kmz attachment, and open it. you will see the station just above the yellow marker.

[yiolas]

OK Ursuadams might be a bit weird, but the video is authentic . All anyone has to do is go to the Webcams at Neumayer-Station and see for yourself. Of course the pictures and videos are open to interpretation and anyone can read into them what they want. The point is that Ursu's videos cannot be debunked based on authenticity only on interpretation.
By the way how can anyone deny that there are strange things going on in the sky at the South Pole ? Oh and another thing, when have you ever seen the moon casting a shadow ?!!

On another topic, it seems that the Space Shuttle Atlantis has been having 'computer problems'. Two of their 5 computers have crashed so far, they still have another 3 to operate on. I can't get Ed Dames out of mind though. Things have been going wrong with this last space flight since before it took off. Here's the link to NASA's space shuttle status report.

This guy has his own opinion though.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GSkj7b8bSR4

[Malachi]

hello, yiolas!

moonlight shadow? you mean something like this?

the full Moon can be surprisingly bright, I grew up far from the big cities and sometimes we could read a book at night - just for fun, maybe one page - and we had not any more light than the light of the Moon.

[dddanieljjjamesss]

Posted by yiolas (here)
OK Ursuadams might be a bit weird, but the video is authentic . All anyone has to do is go to the Webcams at Neumayer-Station and see for yourself. Of course the pictures and videos are open to interpretation and anyone can read into them what they want. The point is that Ursu's videos cannot be debunked based on authenticity only on interpretation.
By the way how can anyone deny that there are strange things going on in the sky at the South Pole ? Oh and another thing, when have you ever seen the moon casting a shadow ?!!

On another topic, it seems that the Space Shuttle Atlantis has been having 'computer problems'. Two of their 5 computers have crashed so far, they still have another 3 to operate on. I can't get Ed Dames out of mind though. Things have been going wrong with this last space flight since before it took off. Here's the link to NASA's space shuttle status report.

This guy has his own opinion though.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GSkj7b8bSR4

the video is authentic and shows very little 'anomaly' that isn't man-made out of paranoia and lack of common sense. no offense to you, but that guy was REACHING FAR

so many of the 'light phenomena' could have just been flood lighting turned on at different points of the night for different purposes, and its just... its too much speculation posing as fact.. i'm sorry... but.... really.... no....

[yiolas]

Posted by Malachi (here)
hello, yiolas!

moonlight shadow? you mean something like this?

the full Moon can be surprisingly bright, I grew up far from the big cities and sometimes we could read a book at night - just for fun, maybe one page - and we had not any more light than the light of the Moon.

O.K. maybe I went a little overboard with the moon, but everything else stands.

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

All lens flares.
The alleged explosions look like the spots (lamps) coming on.
18-36/144. shadow created by the lights of one of the trucks bobbing around?
105/144. You can see the lens flare over the letter "a" in Station.
106/144. Its over the whole name Neumayer. You can follow it from there.

I'm more interested at those bodies coming out of the hole [sic]
94/144. Hatch down
95/144 Hatch up.
96/144 " ".
97/144. Two bodies seem to appear below the hatch.
98/144 Have gone. Hatch still open.
99/144. One body can be seen. Hatch closed

Note.
What evidence have the guys making the videos got that the bodies in the video are wearing radiation suites? Zoot Suites can be & are worn for any reason.

114/144. say cheese.
115/144. The supervisor? Isn't wearing a zoot suit.

[Mandala]

Thought you guys might find Kerry's video she posted of Allex Collier commenting about Nibiru being a ship. His comment is similar to the remarks made by Hoagland. This is part 13.
Time ~ 2:13, when he speaks of Planet X.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SWao4aBl60w

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

Mandala.. Hi

You should read the article on Sott website regarding Kerry / Hoagland video.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/23...a-Sanity-Check

[Sphinxy]

After stepping through the photos on the Neumayer Station website, on 2011-07-15 GMC at 17:30:04 through 18:30:02, I saw the "orb" that looks like a planet in other photos actually in front of the station. My thought is that it's a reflection of some sort through the camera lens. I also realized that the ground shadow comes through on 2011-07-16 GMT at 02:40:03, 05:20:03, and 06:00:03 ... and I agree with others that it's a shadow of the dome protecting the camera.

[The Truth Is In There]

Posted by dddanieljjjamesss (here)
wow that guy is jumping at ANYTHING

he just sounds stupid...

'why isn't this like what we see in the movies? why aren't they wearing hoodies?'

'WHAT IS THAT, WHAT IS THAT' - it's the ****ing shadow of the camera housing... jesus christ get it TOGETHER, man!

yeah he's way out and actually his comments annoy me quite a bit (some of his other clips are even worse. explosion, anyone? haha) but i wanted other people's take on what can be seen. i don't ususally bother with double-checking and going into details such as 'could it possibly be the moon at this time or this must be a lense flare because...' so i let others come to conclusions based on proof they found and take the one that suits me best

[The Truth Is In There]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YtO30Pr6QRs

[Mandala]

Posted by Bryn ap Gwilym (here)
Mandala.. Hi

You should read the article on Sott website regarding Kerry / Hoagland video.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/23...a-Sanity-Check

Good article, albeit sobering facts. I believe Kerry has gotten wind of it also and is not too happy.

[Calz]

Not sure if this has been posted here or not (thread getting rather large). Forgive me if it has.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZQqjM67sVow

[Teakai]

Follow up video posted 16/7/11:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qX03cPyUOJ8

Link: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qX03c...&feature=feedf

[bitworm]

It's a shame such a decent camera is in the hands of this guy who has little if any understanding of how it works.

Or he's gotta be trolling youtube.

EDIT:

On the last video, he claims that the blue object 'is not a moon'.

Here's a grab from the 1st video in this thread, with a couple notable exceptions:



The gray item is based on the image of the moon posted earlier in this thread. The blue item above it is based on the image of the 'real' moon below it. I did a few simple things (resize, adjust hue,saturation,brightness,contrast,opacity,blur) to make it look like the blue object in the video. I never added anything, but I did remove the leftmost portion to match the blue object.

I don't think he added that in later, but I did it because the blue image I made looks essentially the same as the blue object in the video, which can't be anything other than a reflection of our moon.

[Teakai]

Posted by bitworm (here)
It's a shame such a decent camera is in the hands of this guy who has little if any understanding of how it works.

Or he's gotta be trolling youtube.

EDIT:

On the last video, he claims that the blue object 'is not a moon'.

Here's a grab from the 1st video in this thread, with a couple notable exceptions:

The gray item is based on the image of the moon posted earlier in this thread. The blue item above it is based on the image of the 'real' moon below it. I did a few simple things (resize, adjust hue,saturation,brightness,contrast,opacity,blur) to make it look like the blue object in the video. I never added anything, but I did remove the leftmost portion to match the blue object.

I don't think he added that in later, but I did it because the blue image I made looks essentially the same as the blue object in the video, which can't be anything other than a reflection of our moon.

Hi Bitworm - if it is a reflection of the real moon are you saying it's something that's not at all unusual when viewed through special binoculars?

And what is it being reflected off?

[Steve C]

I just dont believe everything Nasa comes out with or youtube.

[bitworm]

It's not the binoculars alone, it's the combination of the binoculars and the camera lens that's causing the effect. The blue object is a reflection from the original source, through the binoculars, to the lens of the camera and back onto the glass on the eyepiece side of the binoculars. The camera is recording the reflection that is on the eyepiece side of the binoculars.

I'm not sure why blue, but I'm guessing something about the coating on one or more of the lenses involved is filtering. It's notable that blue/violet is complementary to orange/yellow, and the actual colors of the objects appear to lie somewhere along those lines.

He moves the binoculars around and the reflection stays the same distance from the yellow light, and seems to make a big deal of it. But when the camera is fixed against the eyepiece of the binoculars while he's moving the binoculars, of course it is gonna keep the same distance. It is only when he holds the binoculars still and moves the camera does the blue object change its position relative to the yellow light.


EDIT:

I also just noticed by bringing down the brightness and up the contrast, the brightest object is not a perfect circle. I did a 'paint bucket fill' with a solid color at a very low threshold, then did the same with the original blue object. By flipping the blue one horizontally and rotating 45 deg CCW, the bright object and the blue object take roughly the same shape. The other orange light in the bottom of the frame is also roughly the same shape as the bright one.