Page 25 of 71 FirstFirst 1 15 25 35 71 LastLast
Results 481 to 500 of 1413

Thread: David Icke 2011

  1. Link to Post #481
    United States Avalon Member truth4me's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th May 2010
    Location
    Northeast corner of Arkansas
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,281
    Thanks
    2,698
    Thanked 5,294 times in 1,094 posts

    Default Re: David icke - the falling pawns on the illuminati chessboard.

    I like David Icke and I believe pretty much everything he speaks about including the Reptilians . Some people think he's a shill which is their right but I can't see it.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to truth4me For This Post:

    fifi (20th August 2011)

  3. Link to Post #482
    UK Honored, Retired Member. Kathy passed on 27 April 2025
    Join Date
    2nd March 2011
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    6,461
    Thanks
    12,482
    Thanked 24,336 times in 5,195 posts

    Default Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Sickened by Louis Theroux's sensational interview with Icke, the Queen responds angrily & the BBC grovels (probably in 2007).


  4. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to ktlight For This Post:

    42 (20th August 2011), Anna (20th August 2011), aranuk (21st August 2011), ceetee9 (22nd August 2011), Dennis Leahy (16th September 2011), fifi (20th August 2011), Heyoka_11 (20th August 2011), Isthatso (20th August 2011), jozam (20th August 2011), jubjubmoreley (21st August 2011), kathymarie (7th September 2011), Lisab (20th August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), pickle (20th August 2011), Referee (21st August 2011), seehas (20th August 2011), ulli (20th August 2011)

  5. Link to Post #483
    Avalon Member Maia Gabrial's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th April 2011
    Location
    On the planet Sophia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    4,605
    Thanks
    15,747
    Thanked 17,168 times in 3,859 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Was this a serious apology by the BBC? It sounded like a joke.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Maia Gabrial For This Post:

    DNA (21st August 2011), Enquiring1 (21st August 2011), IndigoStar (7th September 2011)

  7. Link to Post #484
    Costa Rica Avalon Member ulli's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Posts
    13,863
    Thanks
    67,181
    Thanked 128,073 times in 13,546 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Very Pythonish!
    Notice how they avoided using any actual photographs of Her Majesty?

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ulli For This Post:

    42 (20th August 2011), christian (7th September 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Maia Gabrial (20th August 2011), Marianne (20th August 2011), pickle (20th August 2011)

  9. Link to Post #485
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    14th May 2011
    Age
    83
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 126 times in 39 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    ktlight:

    Kindly stop posting irrelevant material with sensational headlines designed to confuse/disrupt the vital function of the board.

    I have noticed you "slam" topics with a link, then consistently fail to follow guidelines established. Please review suggested management posting guidelines. Something is wrong when valuable topics are posted by members with thoughtful input causing these members posts to immediately get ratcheted off the front page from an influx of garbage.

    If other members follow what you have been doing, unintentionally, and are offended by my recognition of these "grabber" type headlines without further details, I am sure the management will speak up and take a position.

    Have a lovely weekend.

  10. Link to Post #486
    Costa Rica Avalon Member ulli's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Posts
    13,863
    Thanks
    67,181
    Thanked 128,073 times in 13,546 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Ktlight, be not intimidated,
    keep on slamming and grabbing
    even if we don't have the foggiest
    what it's all about.

  11. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to ulli For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), Carolin (21st August 2011), christian (7th September 2011), fifi (20th August 2011), Isthatso (20th August 2011), kathymarie (7th September 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lisab (20th August 2011), Maia Gabrial (22nd August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), Normalguy31 (21st August 2011), pickle (20th August 2011), seko (20th August 2011), shijo (21st August 2011), Sierra (20th August 2011), ThePythonicCow (20th August 2011), toothpick (21st August 2011)

  12. Link to Post #487
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    14th May 2011
    Age
    83
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 126 times in 39 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    ulli:

    I am not attempting to intimidate anyone. I am merely stating a fact. This post should have supplied information to the extent that it was a "spoof". There is a publication called "The Onion" everyone familiar with it enjoys the laugh and is not taken seriously.

    A personal comment before or after the link would have been appropriate.

    If management disagrees with me, they can change the rules. In the meantime, I would suggest we either follow their established guidelines....OR... Those who continue inappropriate postings are personally responsible for the degradation of Project Avalon to a "play-pen" in order to satisfy personal recognition, rather than contribute to the valuable purpose Project Avalon was established.

    Enjoy yourself and be happy.

  13. Link to Post #488
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,294
    Thanks
    36,349
    Thanked 152,139 times in 23,215 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Quote Posted by Foggy (here)
    I am merely stating a fact.
    I read that sentence to claim that you stated a fact, that you only stated a fact, and that you did nothing other than state a fact.

    But I read some other parts of your original post, and your response to Ulli, as making some fairly broad complaints against another member.

    Then I read your closing remark "Enjoy yourself and be happy. " and sense a bit of sarcasm in it.

    I could rush to my guidelines (link conveniently provided below) and likely find something relevant.

    But when I see a disconnect between what one claims to be doing, and what one appears to be doing, I end up at a bit of a loss. Such a disconnect makes it difficult to discern what, if anything, would address your concerns (and consequently whether such would be a good idea.)
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  14. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), Carmody (20th August 2011), Coaxial (7th September 2011), etheric underground (22nd August 2011), kathymarie (20th August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), Mad Hatter (21st August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), Omni (21st August 2011), pickle (20th August 2011), toothpick (21st August 2011)

  15. Link to Post #489
    Avalon Member Carmody's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th August 2010
    Location
    Winning The Galactic Lottery
    Posts
    11,389
    Thanks
    17,597
    Thanked 82,374 times in 10,236 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    I still like it.

    It felt like Python, right on the first word.

    Love it.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I am also sickened by halfway spoken, half hidden, ie... sarcasm.

    Nor do I tolerate people who live life by that rule. I banish them from my group of people I either work or communicate with, as their half hidden behaviors are endemic of a large part of the root of all problems in this world.

    ie an inability to be clear or even handed.

    Point being a large part of the problems in this forum have come from such behaviors.

    Sarcasm is the lie of acting, pretending to be good..while still stabbing.

    Sarcasm can take a complete and total walk, thank you very much.
    Last edited by Carmody; 20th August 2011 at 19:17.
    Interdimensional Civil Servant

  16. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Carmody For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), christian (7th September 2011), fifi (20th August 2011), jjl (21st August 2011), kathymarie (20th August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lisab (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), pickle (20th August 2011), Reirrac (20th August 2011), seko (20th August 2011), smig (21st August 2011), ThePythonicCow (20th August 2011), toothpick (21st August 2011), ulli (20th August 2011)

  17. Link to Post #490
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,294
    Thanks
    36,349
    Thanked 152,139 times in 23,215 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Quote Posted by Foggy (here)
    This post should have supplied information to the extent that it was a "spoof".
    If that is your only concern, then you should have just stated that, without the other dross, perhaps in a PM to the original poster and/or perhaps by Reporting (click the Report Triangle below any post) the post to the moderators, with your request.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), christian (7th September 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), pharoah21 (21st August 2011)

  19. Link to Post #491
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    14th May 2011
    Age
    83
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 126 times in 39 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Paul: Does the following no longer apply?

    Quote 6. POSTING EXTERNAL MATERIAL

    When sharing outside material with the forum, please do it in the form of links with summary paragraphs. Posting long passages (i.e. more than a few short paragraphs) of outside text, regardless of relevance, is prohibited.

    The summary of the content of the link should be a paragraph of your own words and / or with a single-paragraph excerpt from the text itself.

    “Naked” links, i.e. links without summary text, should be avoided, as most members do not have the time to blindly research such links.

  20. Link to Post #492
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,294
    Thanks
    36,349
    Thanked 152,139 times in 23,215 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Quote Posted by Foggy (here)
    Paul: Does the following no longer apply?
    I still have this hunch that if we shared a couple of beers, I'd get a rather different view of what your real concern is.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  21. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), Carmody (20th August 2011), fifi (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), norman (20th August 2011), thunder24 (21st August 2011)

  22. Link to Post #493
    Costa Rica Avalon Member ulli's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Posts
    13,863
    Thanks
    67,181
    Thanked 128,073 times in 13,546 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    I would rather open a video and be surprised by a spoof,
    than open one and be shocked by violence.

    I'm sure ktlight knows the difference...
    her record here as providing good solid information is pretty consistent
    and once in a while for the sake of lightness oops to slam us oops with
    some grabbing comedy oops oops...is perfectly ok in my view.

  23. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ulli For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), Art (22nd August 2011), fifi (20th August 2011), kathymarie (20th August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), Maia Gabrial (22nd August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), shijo (21st August 2011)

  24. Link to Post #494
    United States Avalon Member Ivanhoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Location
    Life of Illusion
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,977
    Thanks
    35,301
    Thanked 9,091 times in 1,920 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    No harm , no foul.
    Keep posting yer stuff kt.

  25. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Post:

    Art (22nd August 2011), kathymarie (20th August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), shadowstalker (20th August 2011), shijo (21st August 2011)

  26. Link to Post #495
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,294
    Thanks
    36,349
    Thanked 152,139 times in 23,215 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Quote Posted by Foggy (here)
    6. POSTING EXTERNAL MATERIAL
    On close reading of Rules B.6.1-.3, by the legalistic section of my brain, I find no such violations in this thread.

    However I did notice possible violations of Rules C.1.1 and C.1.4. -- by yourself.

    Lets show each other some respect, and if you have a specific concern with a specific post, it is often better to discuss it privately with the poster, or to Report it. Try to stay focused in such complaints; leave out the innuendo, sarcasm, broadsides, ...



    Thank-you.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  27. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), Coaxial (7th September 2011), Jake (20th August 2011), kathymarie (20th August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), Maia Gabrial (22nd August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), seko (20th August 2011), thunder24 (21st August 2011), toothpick (21st August 2011)

  28. Link to Post #496
    England Avalon Member pickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    North West UK
    Posts
    344
    Thanks
    4,640
    Thanked 1,611 times in 294 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Meh, pomposity on steroids...

    Keep post ing KT - your posts remind me of my ideas... you post one iffy one in every fifty, I have one good idea in every fifty


    EDIT: Back on thread... That's Queen Mirren, and I've always had a crush on her. I feel weird... fancying royalty 'n all
    Last edited by pickle; 20th August 2011 at 19:52.
    "...when I was a child, I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone....."

  29. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pickle For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011), Lord Sidious (20th August 2011), moonchild (21st August 2011), ulli (22nd August 2011)

  30. Link to Post #497
    Avalon Member phillipbbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2011
    Location
    In a cave learning MorseCode
    Posts
    633
    Thanks
    1,164
    Thanked 1,827 times in 534 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    The voice over gave it away ...... not to sure if it was good taste or not from that point of view.....am sure our guests enjoyed it.

    Moving on...............

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to phillipbbg For This Post:

    shadowstalker (20th August 2011)

  32. Link to Post #498
    Sweden Avalon Member <8>'s Avatar
    Join Date
    21st June 2011
    Age
    53
    Posts
    962
    Thanks
    6,618
    Thanked 3,697 times in 822 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Funny...


    Is there anything (real) they made this joke from, that we know??

    It just dont feel far from the truth, thats all i say..

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to <8> For This Post:

    aranuk (21st August 2011), ktlight (20th August 2011)

  34. Link to Post #499
    United States Avalon Member Darla Ken Pearce's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Location
    Sandpoint, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    1,436
    Thanks
    18,303
    Thanked 8,611 times in 1,338 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Klight has quite a following for her sensational information. Many find it useful. She means well and is contributing what she feels is valid. Not all of us agree. Many people don't like the updates I post in the Spirituality Forum on Avalon ~ they are there for those who find resonance. If you don't like them ~ it's fine ~ hang out somewhere else.

    Like Foggy, I do not like to see so many negative posts on Avalon but it's a choice. If people keep saying, "Thanks," it's a sign that many are following and it is a personal choice whether we read them or not. Too many are addicted to this part of life and again, it's a choice. Those who tire of it will go elsewhere and it's the way of life open to each of us.

    No harm, no foul. Avalon offers a lot of different things for different appetites. Foggy has a valid point here but not many others complain, so the "thanks" seem to have it. Everyone is over 21 years old. ; )

    We can influence others but not change them. And so it is...

    Please do not be so quick to judge others who dare to voice their opinion. It is not necessary for us to all agree and indeed, that's not even possible. If ever there was an unreal expectation, this is it! We must be civil and kind as a community just because it's the right thing to do voluntarily. A PM might have worked better in this instance or not. Who can say?

    Never mind the rules, there are higher ones in play here right now. The way Foggy was attacked for expressing an opinion was surprising to me and a little thought provoking. He or she also means well and has a point to contribute. Maybe we need to take a three second pause before responding to things we find annoying ~ it'd be a nice change on Avalon. Just a tiny bit of inner reflection.

    Those of us who are tired of negativity are not in real conflict with those who bask in it. We just differ in opinion. These are choices we make within every moment of our lives and either high or low vibrations are attracted to us. And we often are attracted to headlines that suit our "state of being" at any moment in time or out of it. Let each one choose. If you are continually attracted to the dark side, you may want to reassess your tastes in reading material. The dark can't leave unless we allow it. Negatives and fear ~ fuel the dark side and keep it alive and well. If only we could realize this fully.

    BTW, I heard that London is burning but it may be just a rumor. I don't live there and so don't know whether it's true or not. The Queen is probably more concerned with Buckingham Palace burning down right now than she is with David Icke in an interview ~ a year or so ago.

    These are the sort of events we bring upon ourselves dwelling in either negatives or positive aspects of our lives. What we put out there is returned ten or a hundred fold. If that doesn't give one pause for reflection, nothing ever will. I hope the Queen is listening in right now. MI6 and all. Anyone else smell smoke? Much love! xoxoxox

  35. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Darla Ken Pearce For This Post:

    christian (7th September 2011), Davidallany (20th August 2011), DNA (21st August 2011), Enquiring1 (21st August 2011), fifi (20th August 2011), Flasky (21st August 2011), jubjubmoreley (21st August 2011), KiwiElf (8th September 2011), thunder24 (21st August 2011), Truthseeker85 (20th August 2011)

  36. Link to Post #500
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    14th May 2011
    Age
    83
    Posts
    46
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 126 times in 39 posts

    Default Re: Queen attacks David Icke & BBC

    Paul:

    To put things in context,
    1. My comments were not a complaint; they were an observation. An observation of an inordinate number of posted links without summary text has been on the increase. I have no complaint against the original poster of this thread. I merely made a request because....

    2. The subsequent post would not be necessary.
    Quote Was this a serious apology by the BBC? It sounded like a joke.
    3. Another observation was made due to the difficulty locating posts that are no longer on the front page

    Quote Something is wrong when valuable topics are posted by members with thoughtful input causing these members posts to immediately get ratcheted off the front page because an influx of useless garbage was heaped on the board. This type of information is available at other sites. Posting it on Project Avalon diminishes the quality of this community.
    Again, this was my observation:
    Quote If other members follow what you have been doing, unintentionally, and are offended by my recognition of these "grabber" type headlines without further details, I am sure the management will speak up and take a position.
    4. There were 4 members of this board that made posts revealing information who the real enemy is with ample data/links.
    It was not theory or conspiracy. It was substantiated facts with a lot of reading. There were no comments to the posts due to the aforementioned with the exception of one post. I recall DNA was one of the posters. These 4 posters connected the dots and I believe they are not aware how valuable their individual information was unless they read the other member's material.

    5. Because many of us are programed to seek what is new, (cell phones, computers, cars, travel, news, etc.) the latest excitement; we fail to connect with history. This results in confusion promoting the inability to recognize patterns. The controllers know this, therefore, the barrage of garbage and useless information does not stop.

    6. I am of the opinion from observation as a "lurker" then member, the quantity of information is intentionally dispersed to drown out the quality.

    7. Case in point...there is a recent post concerning a members experience exposed to the same technology that resulted in the female Astronaut to drive non-stop Texas to Florida wearing a diaper. I am sure this member has not made the connection to the Astronaut's delimina (especially what she went through previously to her trip) with the ongoing confusion he reported and detailed his experience in the last several months.

    8. In the final analysis, it is your Board. I recognize there are members with short attention spans who thrive on gossip and fuzz, therefore, do as you choose.

    9. Perhaps Bill's absence had an effect on the quality of the Board as some have implied? Only he would know from his personal evaluation of all the threads and posted comments in his absence.
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 20th August 2011 at 21:26. Reason: fix quote'ing

Page 25 of 71 FirstFirst 1 15 25 35 71 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts