Well here is an interesting piece of film i found... After performing a search i couldn't find any topics on it here nor on David Ickes' website, so of course i thought maybe its time there was.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...9914965262207# 1 hour
Speaking from my own point of view, i like a lot of what Jordan Maxwell has to say, especially when considering how his presenting's have helped form such works as Zeitgeist and many well known speakers and researchers in the "alternative" field. However there are some things that didn't quite sit well with me - this is to be expected with any one; as the fictional Obi Wan once said "Many truths depend on our point of view".
I've seen a few people post how they are very much at odds with Maxwell and feel ill ease and suspect regarding his possible agenda and motivations. Yet this was never expanded upon. Of course there is always disinformalists (new word!) and those who will attempt character assassination and with people/ characters such as "Jordan Maxwell" its pretty clear why there would be so. So when i post this video i hope people will have the clarity of mind to consider these kind of things and take all issues in balance.
Being erroneous on some points does not invalidate all other work one has put forth and fallibility is part and parcel of being an incarnate being - according to myself. But never the less it is important to pay attention to the many facets of a diamond to see the super structure.
Many take issue with "Jordan" because he is a Mason, i can see from their point (though i do not see things as simplistically as some)... Especially if they have been exposed to information such as this
Excerpt from site :
Now of course this is propaganda. But of what sort? Is it Black, Grey or merely White Propaganda? I don't know... I'm not a Mason... Im not rich enough to be one. And as nearly all the known Masons i have been exposed to (and suffered from) seem to greatly value capitalistic doctrine and the illusion of status and the rather diseased and destructive philosophy like that of Ayn Rand i fully comprehend why people would have issues with the agenda of the society and the programming the members are subject to.I do promise and swear that I will not give the Grand Hailing Sign of Distress of a Master Mason, except for the benefit of the Craft while at work or for the instruction of a Brother, unless I am in real distress; and should I see the sign given, or hear the word spoken, I will hasten to the relief of the person so giving it.
Question: What about when a NON Mason gives a sign of distress?
Answer: No obligation required. Typical of an elitist and anti-social cult.
Furthermore: I do promise and swear that I will not give the substitute for the Master’s Word in any other way or manner than that in which I receive it, which will be on the Five points of Fellowship, and at low breath.
Furthermore: I do promise and swear that I will not wrong, cheat, nor defraud a Master Masons Lodge, or a worthy Brother of this degree to the value of anything, knowingly, nor suffer it to be done by another, if in my power to prevent.
Question: What about wronging, cheating, or defrauding a NON Mason?
Answer: See previous response, supra.
Furthermore: I do promise and swear that I will not knowingly strike a Brother Master Mason, nor otherwise do him personal violence in anger, except in the necessary of myself, family or property.
Question: What about striking or doing personal violence in anger to a NON Mason?
Answer: See previous response, supra.
Furthermore: I do promise and swear that I will not have illicit carnal intercourse with a Master Mason’s wife, widow, mother, sister or daughter, nor suffer it to be done by another if in my power to prevent.
Question: What about not having illicit carnal intercourse with a NON Mason's wife, widow, mother, sister, or daughter?
Answer: See previous response, supra.
Question: What about not having illicit carnal intercourse with a Master Masons SON?
Answer: See previous response, supra.
But surely this is a case of rotten apples in a barrel causing the others to rot? A whole other topic surely.
There is a Roman Maxim of Law: "Let he who would be deceived be deceived". This is and has been used against the "average Joe" for thousands of years now. Its very nasty do you not think? Surely a system that advocates such attitudes should be condemned and stripped of power?
So what do you think?
Is Jordan part of a deliberate deception? Is he simply misinformed on some points? Perhaps there is such truth in his words that there is a concentrated effort to discredit the fellow on any point possible, however small, in the hope that the baby will be thrown out with the bathwater? Maybe its a mingle of things... i refer back to my comment on the fallibility of being incarnate.
I look forward to your comments...




