Did Nukes Take down the twin towers and building 7 on 9-11?

**smat** · 18th May 2010 17:11

I've watched the entire video and I am convinced that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were taken down with Nuclear Devices.
I have done a lot of research on 9-11, this video doesn't explain everything about that day. But this guy puts across very good evidence that 3 Nukes were used on 9-11 and also names and shows a picture of the Missile that he thinks was used on the Pentagon which penetrated 4 thick concrete walls and came out the other side which is impossible for an Airplane to do.

http://www.project.nsearch.com/forum...ers-and-bldg-7

**Swami** · 18th May 2010 17:16

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

**Etherios** · 18th May 2010 17:55

poor guy he still thinks there will be an inquiry about 9/11 hehehe

**Olam** · 18th May 2010 22:34

I just watched all of the videos, its very revealing and logic. One thing though is that he did not say who did it.......so has anyone read the book?

**Enlightenment101** · 18th May 2010 22:49

You might want to look into Fluoride Laser,
Review this there was more going on at Ground Zero than ever told
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=225&Itemid=60
Go to the 5:25 mark. and Listen ...

**Enlightenment101** · 18th May 2010 22:57

911 mystery
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LwayjX4ipFc

**Tuza** · 18th May 2010 23:24

What I still cannot understand is why aren't the general public of the states demanding more answers on what happened; surely there must be a lot of them awake by now over this?

**Etherios** · 19th May 2010 07:32

Posted by Tuza (here)
What I still cannot understand is why aren't the general public of the states demanding more answers on what happened; surely there must be a lot of them awake by now over this?

In US atm anyone talking about things like this is a terrorist or a racist and he isnt well treated not to say the networks wont allow them to publically talk about this. Listen to Alex Jones if you want to understand things in US atm.

**smat** · 19th May 2010 10:09

Posted by Olam (here)
I just watched all of the videos, its very revealing and logic. One thing though is that he did not say who did it.......so has anyone read the book?

I think that might be another show on who he claims is responsible, I'm not sure but I will see if I can find out

**smat** · 19th May 2010 10:25

I've had a look, not managed to find a follow up interview yet
But here is some more info on Nuclear Demolition theory.

http://www.nuclear-demolition.com/

**SteveX** · 19th May 2010 16:07

Yer, I suppose that would explain the mushroom cloud and shock wave damage to other buildings. And to think of all those construction workers getting radiation poisoning, cancer, becoming sterile and producing deformed children. Oh the humanity.

**smat** · 19th May 2010 18:52

Posted by SteveX (here)
Yer, I suppose that would explain the mushroom cloud and shock wave damage to other buildings. And to think of all those construction workers getting radiation poisoning, cancer, becoming sterile and producing deformed children. Oh the humanity.

You obviously haven't watched the video, it explains that underground nukes react differently to airborne nukes and it was the shock wave that took the towers down.
I understand that your beliefs of what took the towers down may be different than mine, none of us know all the facts neither are we demolition experts. This seems to fit with what I believe although I only heard of this theory a couple of days ago. Please watch the video and see if you still feel the same way.

**Strat** · 2nd June 2010 00:16

Posted by Tuza (here)
What I still cannot understand is why aren't the general public of the states demanding more answers on what happened; surely there must be a lot of them awake by now over this?

There are people demanding answers but most people are apathetic. Most believe what the news tells them. My own mother thinks I'm being silly when I bring it up, I don't really bother anymore. This is the general mindset of the States. Work the 9-5 get home, watch the news, go to sleep, repeat. Not all are like this but most and I don't blame them. It's a matter of perspective I guess.

Posted by Etherios
In US atm anyone talking about things like this is a terrorist or a racist and he isnt well treated not to say the networks wont allow them to publically talk about this. Listen to Alex Jones if you want to understand things in US atm.

This isn't really true. I've talked about 9/11 at parties and social situations before. It's generally your attitude about the subject. The "you need to open your eyes" attitude bothers people. It's somewhat condescending. I like people and I get along with most of them. I have a great sense of humor and a wealth of knowledge on the subject, this makes me a nasty person to run against in the 9/11 argument in the social situations. If you have the ability to go on a tangent like a comedian going off on a silly subject then people start to listen.

Nobody has ever called me a racist or a terrorist though, paranoid maybe, but not the other two. The sad thing is now a lot of people over here are getting cynical towards Muslims and that bothers me. The general attitude towards them is, "I'm sure there are 'some' good Muslims out there." Just today on the 700 club Pat Robertson was saying that some Muslims teach a message of hate towards the western world inside their mosques. I have a nagging suspicion that he is lying through his teeth.

**TThinking** · 14th July 2010 20:28

Nukes possible,still a fascinating story 911.Big question why didn't anybody pick on silverstein.Cleaning the towers from asbestos would have cost him a billion.Now he made billions.

**Bill Ryan** · 15th July 2010 00:12

Posted by smat (here)
I've watched the entire video and I am convinced that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were taken down with Nuclear Devices.
I have done a lot of research on 9-11, this video doesn't explain everything about that day. But this guy puts across very good evidence that 3 Nukes were used on 9-11 and also names and shows a picture of the Missile that he thinks was used on the Pentagon which penetrated 4 thick concrete walls and came out the other side which is impossible for an Airplane to do.

http://www.project.nsearch.com/forum...ers-and-bldg-7

Folks, I've just read Dimitri Khalezov's whistleblowing book:

9/11thology : The “third” truth about 9/11

This man describes himself as:

Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former officer of Soviet Nuclear Intelligence, officially known as the Special Control Service of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry.

He says he KNOWS what happened (he is a whistleblower with inside information) - and it was a nuclear demolition.

http://nuclear-demolition.com

http://911thology.com/home.html

http://depositfiles.com/files/s5socosne

If the book is not available at the Depositfiles URL, let me know and I'll link it on the Avalon server. He's published the first 11 chapters as a free e-book. Serious 9/11 researchers MUST read this.

**Teakai** · 15th July 2010 00:54

There's an interview on Veritas (love it!) with Dr. Judy Wood speaking about 'direct energy technology' being used on 9/11. I haven't listened to that program yet, but here's the link to the first part if you're interested.

http://www.veritasshow.com/veritasplayer.html

It's episode 51.

**Anchor** · 15th July 2010 01:15

Posted by SteveX (here)
Yer, I suppose that would explain the mushroom cloud and shock wave damage to other buildings. And to think of all those construction workers getting radiation poisoning, cancer, becoming sterile and producing deformed children. Oh the humanity.

Damn it man, you broke my sarcasm detector

I think mini-nukes would be a better description. Their effects can be shaped like any other explosive given the right environment. Like being underground for example.

Also not all nukes are dirty in terms of long lived radiation - I am sure these would have been at the pinnacle of thier design and a "clean burn".

I think it a plausible theory. Along with the thermite that was used to cut the steel into truck sized lengths - for which evidence was also found.

John..

**Tuza** · 15th July 2010 03:39

Exactly John, with the nuclear bombs they have now if they used even a small one to bring down the towers it would have wiped out New York City and beyond, I don't think so, has to be something similar to what Dr Wood said; having looked at controlled demolitions plenty of times and how they fall down without other buildings being taken down I still think this is the more likely scenario. The stupidity that all of us would think that one plane or two planes could bring down the twin towers like a pack of cards makes me think that those responsible for this are not that bright really.

**noxon medem** · 15th July 2010 15:05

..
- It is quite obvious that some type of advanced and well-timed explosions
took place on 11. septemper 2001 in the World Trade Center, Twin Towers,
and was the maine cause of the collaps of the buildings.
That basic fact most truthseekers can agree upon.

This leads us to the next questions of Who (suspect) and Why (motive),
and How, since that will limit he range of suspects (and is part of the story).
- If Thermate was used (as proven by professors Jones and Harrit)
then we are looking for someone with extensive access to the buildings.
- If a Ray/beam from a satelite was used (as stated by John Lear)
we are looking for someone with access to secret spaceprograms.
- If Micro-nukes were used ( a theory also put forth by Bill Deagle) we look
for someone with access to both the advanced explosives and the buildings.
...
While on the subject:
I want to share a concern, or precaution-point, to the 911 truthmovement, and
the many other groups or individual working to get to the facts of the case, and to
bring the real story of the terror-acts to the light, and the real bandits to justice.

- Do not put too much weight on building 7 in the story, even if it is a "smoking gun".
The demolition of Building 7 could easily be explained (away) within common reason.

There are many reasons why a high security building like wtc7 would be secretly
rigged with explosives, so it could be taken down, if taken over by an enemy in war,
or by other qualified circumstances, defined in some Emergency-protocol.
It could turn out it selfdestructed by accident or system failure, and its kept secret
of embarrassement, or to protect the knowledge of the protocol, or whatever.

Do not put the trust (credibility) of your story on Building 7, because if I am right
with my intuition on this, the alternative (real) story could fall with it, or badly injure.
...
There is plenty of evidence (actual and circumstantial) in the rest of this sad saga.
The Twin Towers are packed with evidence on their own, and even more together.
Personally I find the testimony of witnesses to be the best eye-opener and evidence,
combined with expert analysis of the technical side of the matter.
..

**Bill Ryan** · 17th July 2010 11:15

-----------

Dimitri Khalezov interviewed by Bill Deagle on 28 June:

Dr Bill Deagle Show 100628 1/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JSV6k7VZu-k

Dr Bill Deagle Show 100628 2/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov
http://youtube.com/watch?v=saKty3BQyfo

Dr Bill Deagle Show 100628 3/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov
http://youtube.com/watch?v=6_-3CoHMd3E

Dr Bill Deagle Show 100628 4/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov
http://youtube.com/watch?v=7unmuLSL01k