Conspiracy of Science: Earth is in fact growing

[AlexanderLight]

I've heard of this theory about a couple of years now and many claim it answers a lot of of the old questions:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

The Pangea Theory: A Big Deception!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0iW5HUrEkc8

Why the Pangea Theory is Inaccurate:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=z1oza6jybOA

Why Dinosaurs Extinct:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EdavRmR-2YE

Personally, I think it makes a lot of sense, but I am curious to know what do you think of it and why.

[Sidney]

Makes sense to me too.

[GlassSteagallfan]

Interesting! Where does all the water come from? Shouldn't it all be dry land?

[Pete]

Good point, the water must have been pretty deep all over the planet and as the planet stretched out the water would have gradually drained into the lower areas exposed. hence the sea creature fossils on top of mountains. If this is the case what is inside the earth blowing it up?

[Operator]

Posted by GlassSteagallfan (here)
Interesting! Where does all the water come from? Shouldn't it all be dry land?

I've heard a theory and seen a documentary (can't remember the URL) that earth will receive water from space under influence of radiation.
We're in a special position again to receive this extra radiation ... earth will experience it as extra precipitation.

Well that does ring a bell doesn't it ? All cultures have some kind of deluge myth ...

[aranuk]

I was thinking the same asyou GS. Where did it come from?



Stan

[ThePythonicCow]

Somewhere several years ago (I forget now where) I first read of the expanding earth theory. It made sense then to me, and it still makes sense. The first video in Post #1 is the best presentation of it I've seen. Awesome!

As that video says, it changes physics, down to the sub-atomic level. That's one reason, of many, that I find Paul LaViolette's subquantum kinetics (SQK) to be so compelling. SQK explains how mass and energy are created, wherever gravity is strong enough, including in the middle of the earth. This is not atomic fusion or fission, by which atoms split and join and release energy. This is the creation of more mass and energy, forming from the underlying ether.

The physics of relativity and quantum mechanics are replaced. The cosmology of the Big Bang is completely rewritten. The underlying mechanisms that cause gravitational and electromagnetic fields are explained. The physics of "Free Energy" are explained.

This is one of the (many no doubt) stories that "change everything."

So it cannot be told.

But now it is being told, in Post #1 above.

Awesome.

Some details:

It might be that the larger dinosaurs died out because gravity increased, as the earth expanded. The long and heavy necks and tails of some large dinosaurs could not be supported in our earth's current gravity.

Mass is, I believe, being created in the core of the earth. This likely includes simply hydrocarbons, providing an essentially inexhaustible supply of combustible gas from deep underground. If the amount of water on this planet is increasing, it might account for that as well.

Not all the earth's energy comes from the sun. A substantial portion of it is generated internally, out of the underlying and omni-present ether. That's why the earth's core is hotter than it's surface, not cooler.

[lightning23]

[Pete]

Posted by Paul (here)

Mass is, I believe, being created in the core of the earth. This likely includes simply hydrocarbons, providing an essentially inexhaustible supply of combustible gas from deep underground. If the amount of water on this planet is increasing, it might account for that as well.

Not all the earth's energy comes from the sun. A substantial portion of it is generated internally, out of the underlying and omni-present ether. That's why the earth's core is hotter than it's surface, not cooler.[/INDENT][/INDENT]

Very interesting, Lindsey williams was quoted as saying that oil is not a fossil fuel that it is produced from within the planet, it is inorganic. He was discussing peak oil and the fact that there was a lot more oil than was quoted by the data. I even checked it up on wikipedia at the time and saw it confirmed, strangely I have just re-checked to confirm my point and I cannot find the quote. I know I have seen it in the past.

That said there could well be some truth in what you propose.

[eric charles]

Wow this is something really interesting , an absolutely total different point of view , very cool

[Ruby L.]

Thanks for the introduction to the theory, AlexanderLight. It's the first time I've heard of it, and it's very, very interesting. Food to expand this mind, indeed!

[Etherios]

i dont understand why this will shake the science community ... can anyone thing of why?

[Operator]

Posted by Ruby L. (here)
Thanks for the introduction to the theory, AlexanderLight. It's the first time I've heard of it, and it's very, very interesting. Food to expand this mind, indeed!

Well his reputation is much disputed but Clif High is talking about it for quite a while now. It's a fixed part of his reports now.

[DouglasDanger]

Posted by Pete (here)
Good point, the water must have been pretty deep all over the planet and as the planet stretched out the water would have gradually drained into the lower areas exposed. hence the sea creature fossils on top of mountains. If this is the case what is inside the earth blowing it up?

I ron and metals continue to expand as they are heated... earth feels like it was moved into position so the suns heat would then expand it over time....

[13th Warrior]

If the Earth is expanding, wouldn't the days gradually get longer and this should be verifiable...

[lightning23]

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Etherios (here)
i dont understand why this will shake the science community ... can anyone thing of why?

"Modern day" physics has no way to account for energy and mass being created inside a planet or star. It postulates that all the matter, energy and order of the Universe were created in one "miraculous" Big Bang, and now we're just "running out the clock", as the total mass plus energy remains constant, and the order (entropy) decays.

Planets might accrete some material from meteor collisions, but that would add more mass to the surface, not from within the earth, as required to cause it to expand like a balloon. Nothing in "modern" physics or cosmology really explains the steadily increasing core mass and the hot, energetic core energies, of planet earth.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by 13th Warrior (here)
If the Earth is expanding, wouldn't the days gradually get longer and this should be verifiable...

Yes - I expect that is so.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by DouglasDanger (here)
I ron and metals continue to expand as they are heated... earth feels like it was moved into position so the suns heat would then expand it over time....

The linear coefficient of expansion of iron, at room temperature, is about 10 parts per million per degree Celsius. To double in length, if this property were constant with temperature (it's not), the iron temperature would have to raise (a million divided by ten) 100,000 degrees C.

The temperature of the earth's core is thought to be about 5,000 degrees C, which is much less than 100,000 degrees C.

So iron expansion does not seem to come close to explaining this.

For that matter, if the earth received all its heat energy from the sun, why is the core the hottest part, not the surface?

[Operator]

Posted by 13th Warrior (here)
If the Earth is expanding, wouldn't the days gradually get longer and this should be verifiable...

The length of the day is determined by its rotation around its axis ... the speed at the surface near the equator would become higher but
that doesn't determine the length of a day. The funny thing is that if you move faster through space you will experience it as time speeding
up. And isn't that the case at the moment ?

But there is another physical effect too. Look at ice dancers ... if they turn their pirouettes it makes a difference when they keep their hands
and arms close to their bodies. So if I remember correctly a body will turn slower when the mass is distributed outward.

[lightning23]