Ron Paul (2010-2011)

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Oh, it is a corporation and always was.
It came into existence before the constitution.
However, you still haven't dealt with the question, so I will throw it open to all.
Anyone who hasn't been on this chase with me before wanna try?
What is THE number one issue facing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA corporation as of this very minute?

If I were to guess where you're going here I would say it has something to do with the fact that the United States Government exists in name only and the corporation in question is and has been under a managed receivership by International Bankers. The receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States..."

I'm guessing, of course.

You are in the general area, but what I am referring to is debt.
That is the number one issue for the corporation.

[T Smith]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Oh, it is a corporation and always was.
It came into existence before the constitution.
However, you still haven't dealt with the question, so I will throw it open to all.
Anyone who hasn't been on this chase with me before wanna try?
What is THE number one issue facing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA corporation as of this very minute?

If I were to guess where you're going here I would say it has something to do with the fact that the United States Government exists in name only and the corporation in question is and has been under a managed receivership by International Bankers. The receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States..."

I'm guessing, of course.

You are in the general area, but what I am referring to is debt.
That is the number one issue for the corporation.

Perhaps then the dilemma facing the corporation is how to satisfy its debt without extinguishing the money supply.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Oh, it is a corporation and always was.
It came into existence before the constitution.
However, you still haven't dealt with the question, so I will throw it open to all.
Anyone who hasn't been on this chase with me before wanna try?
What is THE number one issue facing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA corporation as of this very minute?

If I were to guess where you're going here I would say it has something to do with the fact that the United States Government exists in name only and the corporation in question is and has been under a managed receivership by International Bankers. The receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States..."

I'm guessing, of course.

You are in the general area, but what I am referring to is debt.
That is the number one issue for the corporation.

Perhaps then the dilemma facing the corporation is how to satisfy its debt without extinguishing the money supply.

Which is not possible and that is the dilemma.
But I bet you knew that already.

[T Smith]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Oh, it is a corporation and always was.
It came into existence before the constitution.
However, you still haven't dealt with the question, so I will throw it open to all.
Anyone who hasn't been on this chase with me before wanna try?
What is THE number one issue facing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA corporation as of this very minute?

If I were to guess where you're going here I would say it has something to do with the fact that the United States Government exists in name only and the corporation in question is and has been under a managed receivership by International Bankers. The receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States..."

I'm guessing, of course.

You are in the general area, but what I am referring to is debt.
That is the number one issue for the corporation.

Perhaps then the dilemma facing the corporation is how to satisfy its debt without extinguishing the money supply.

Which is not possible and that is the dilemma.
But I bet you knew that already.

Yup. Perpetual slavery. Good times....

[Lord Sidious]

So now that we have that out of the way.
Who would like to guess what the constitution is for?
And the bill of rights too?

[161803398]

The only question should be whether what he says is right or not and whether anyone else has any better ideas. Personally, I love his idea about stopping the war on drugs, but that's just me.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

well Lord Sid, right now the constitution is for toilet paper. What else is it for?

[161803398]

No 1 issue facing the US corporation -- I think they have a take over coming on.

[Seikou-Kishi]

Posted by 161803398 (here)
[/COLOR]well Lord Sid, right now the constitution is for toilet paper. What else is it for?

Enforcing by popular sovereignty against the will of the fascists and globalistic usurers.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)

Posted by 161803398 (here)
[/COLOR]well Lord Sid, right now the constitution is for toilet paper. What else is it for?

Enforcing by popular sovereignty against the will of the fascists and globalistic usurers.

Erm, no, sorry.

[Ron Mauer Sr]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Oh, it is a corporation and always was.
It came into existence before the constitution.
However, you still haven't dealt with the question, so I will throw it open to all.
Anyone who hasn't been on this chase with me before wanna try?
What is THE number one issue facing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA corporation as of this very minute?

The United States is broke. The country cannot run without getting borrowed money, or printing it, or both. Whoever has the gold makes the rules.

[Jonathon]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
So now that we have that out of the way.
Who would like to guess what the constitution is for?
And the bill of rights too?

The Constitution/Bill of Rights is/are a negotiated 'guarantee' of rights, privileges and terms to the debtor (The USA and it's subsidiaries/stock holders) as granted by the Creditor(s). It is a representation of reserved allowances - evidence of terms under a contractual obligation to either "do something" in exchange or "do something" until which time the agreement is fulfilled.

Realize a piece of paper does not grant you anything. You do by your own actions! A maxim of law: He who fails to assert his rights has none. If someone has to write it down for you, you are no longer in charge. Sovereignty requires no representations - and as a point of fact, true sovereignty demands nothing outside of itself.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by Jonathon (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
So now that we have that out of the way.
Who would like to guess what the constitution is for?
And the bill of rights too?

The Constitution/Bill of Rights is/are a negotiated 'guarantee' of rights, privileges and terms to the debtor (The USA and it's subsidiaries/stock holders) as granted by the Creditor(s). It is a representation of reserved allowances - evidence of terms under a contractual obligation to either "do something" in exchange or "do something" until which time the agreement is fulfilled.

Realize a piece of paper does not grant you anything. You do by your own actions! A maxim of law: He who fails to assert his rights has none. If someone has to write it down for you, you are no longer in charge. Sovereignty requires no representations - and as a point of fact, true sovereignty demands nothing outside of itself.

You got it.
It is a debt repayment agreement with all the terms and conditions in it.
Now, how many American avalonuggets got taught this?

[Lisab]

For those interested in astrology here's an analysis of Ron Paul's birth chart from astrologer Steve Judd, who aside from Ulli is the most awesome astrologer Ive come across in over 20 years of interest in astrology.
Leo with the Moon in Taurus (no known birth time). observation of natal chart show two significant aspects. To a minor degree, the Mars/Jupiter conjunction in his chart shows an element of both humour and optimism. But far more importantly, he was born with an exact opposition from Mercury to Saturn, an aspect that really inhibits communication when young but which matures and ripens the mind when older. It means that he will never lost the plot, he will retain both mobility and marbles until he dies at a ripe old age, and that he has a sense of duty, loyalty and honour hardwired into his system.
With Pluto currently favouring both his Mercury and his Saturn, and Saturn in the sky just starting a nine month sextile to his Sun, to my mind he is clearly the only viable opposition to Obama, and if he plays the distinguished old school gentleman image and disassociates himself from the more rabid pack of Tea Party wannabees, he could seriously mount a credible challenge.
I like the guy's chart. He's someone whom I would naturally trust, just on the strength of his horoscope.

[bodhii71]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by Jonathon (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
So now that we have that out of the way.
Who would like to guess what the constitution is for?
And the bill of rights too?

The Constitution/Bill of Rights is/are a negotiated 'guarantee' of rights, privileges and terms to the debtor (The USA and it's subsidiaries/stock holders) as granted by the Creditor(s). It is a representation of reserved allowances - evidence of terms under a contractual obligation to either "do something" in exchange or "do something" until which time the agreement is fulfilled.

Realize a piece of paper does not grant you anything. You do by your own actions! A maxim of law: He who fails to assert his rights has none. If someone has to write it down for you, you are no longer in charge. Sovereignty requires no representations - and as a point of fact, true sovereignty demands nothing outside of itself.

You got it.
It is a debt repayment agreement with all the terms and conditions in it.
Now, how many American avalonuggets got taught this?

This is in alignment with the theoretical statements of being a freeman on the land.
Something I believe to be correct. Something I believe will never be tolerated in this country.
I believe It fair to say, if enough people came to this understanding, camp FEMA would open its resort doors.
The problem with this, on a grander scale, it cannot function as a country. So the wheels perpetually churn, we in it's wake, hurling to the yawning grave, changing nothing. It's the futility the creates the elitist mindset, taking as much for themselves, utilizing the general populace to its own ends. I think this scenario has probably played out countless times...

[OneLittleFrog]

Posted by Lisab (here)
...he has a sense of duty, loyalty and honour hardwired into his system.

But I have to wonder, duty and loyalty to whom?

[seko]

It seems to me that Ron Paul is the continuation of Obama.......he fits the person who is going to Change everything for the good of the country and bring the troops back to the U.S........wait a minute, I heard that before somewhere??!!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=p12cAclNCRU

No wonder why he said that you could take that to the bank, so you can never see it again!

Ron Paul might be the right option, but he won't be in charge. Let's put our feet on the ground, he won;t be the master of puppets!

[risveglio]

Posted by seko (here)
It seems to me that Ron Paul is the continuation of Obama.......he fits the person who is going to Change everything for the good of the country and bring the troops back to the U.S........wait a minute, I heard that before somewhere??!!

No wonder why he said that you could take that to the bank, so you can never see it again!

Ron Paul might be the right option, but he won't be in charge. Let's put our feet on the ground, he won;t be the master of puppets!

There is no comparison. Ron Paul has been speaking about the same message for years. Little has changed in his message. He has an actual plan, not just Hope and Change. This years "Hope & Change" is supposed to be "999" but they may have picked the wrong guy or didn't protect him enough.

The most important subject that makes Ron Paul stand out against everyone else on the stage and is our best chance of restoring some liberty in the world, is his stance on sound money and the Fed. The majority of complaints in this world and problems we have go right back to the central bank, very few have stood up against the central bank. Ron Paul was the one telling Obama, "You bring no change" after the bailouts and the health care joke.

Now as for the fact that Government is slavery, I agree but there is no way you are going to go from a pseudo communist-fascist government to a voluntary society in a short amount of time. Ron Paul's MESSAGE is peeling back the onion and changing some of the bull****. He is the only real option we have had in decades.

Now when it comes to Peace, Ron Paul is also your only option as an US citizen. If nothing else you should vote for him because it will either close down the military state or expose them. If the man is willing to put himself and his family in harms way, why not back him, inform more people. Ron Paul's "Revolution" was what made me see a lot of the craziness in the world that led me to PA because I just couldn't make sense of it. I think if you are an US citizen, even if you are an anarchist or miniarchist, you would be helping the cause more by pulling the trigger this time than staying home.

[WhiteFeather]

Attention Peeps: There is no difference between Republicans and Democrats its part of the play/script.... as Lord Sidious would Say.

[risveglio]

Posted by OneLittleFrog (here)

Posted by Lisab (here)
...he has a sense of duty, loyalty and honour hardwired into his system.

But I have to wonder, duty and loyalty to whom?

Not sure why this is questioned, though for every other candidate we know the answer is not the people.

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
Attention Peeps: There is no difference between Republicans and Democrats its part of the play/script.... as Lord Sidious would Say.

Very true and Dr. Paul would be one of the first ones to tell you there is little difference.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by OneLittleFrog (here)

Posted by Lisab (here)
...he has a sense of duty, loyalty and honour hardwired into his system.

But I have to wonder, duty and loyalty to whom?

And that is the operative question indeed.
Anyone who really threatens the system ends up ''dealt with'' in one way or another.

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
Attention Peeps: There is no difference between Republicans and Democrats its part of the play/script.... as Lord Sidious would Say.

The only difference between death by hanging and death by shooting is the method, there is no difference in the outcome.