Benjamin Fulford's posts and reports

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by Hatemachines (here)

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)

Posted by mariposafe (here)

Posted by Cottage Rose (here)


...... This would mean a Russian/German controlled Europe ......

Sound familiar anyone ?

How does that line go "Don't be a dumb dumb, be a smarty, come and join the Nazi Party!" (I'm not advocating, just an reference cue.)

Noobs ! even newbie's would know better.

Goodness, i was just trying to be funny. So what if I'm not up to snuff on the last German/Russian alliance, personally I just find this whole exercise rather amusing. All this posturing is the biggest dog and pony act out there. Russia and US have been allies for decades now, and yet publicly sling mud at each other. Germany is just a happy little player in the whole game , North Korea wont throw Nukes and nor will US, because the Benevolents just wont let us destroy ourselves like that. They've already made that crystal clear.

[ponda]

Posted by jagman (here)
The Korean Peninsula is a tenderbox .So regardless if Kim was murdered or if he died of cancer, Has the MSM reports, It makes
know difference ( One little spark could ignite a nuclear exchange! )

It might not be so simple as that.

Bruce Cathie has theorized that nukes can only be detonated at specific locations and at specific times:

Stung by both ridicule and criticism, Bruce Cathie was once asked to prove his claim of being able to predict a nuclear test. "I found that a bomb has to be detonated on a geophysical point at a particular time," he said. His reasoning for this relates to his claimed harmonic lines of force [see the work of Carl P Munck, Michael Lawrence Morton etc elsewhere on this website], or the geophysical position of the sun in relation to specific points located on the earth's surface.

Calculations carried out by Cathie led him to forecast the exact time a French nuclear test would be carried out on a remote atoll in the south pacific during 1968. Armed with his theory and mathematical knowledge, he then determined that the geophysical points of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in relationship to the sun matched precisely the timing of the American atomic bombing of these two Japanese cities at the end of World War II.

Cathie believes that it is not possible to simply conduct a nuclear explosion at any time and at any point on the world's surface, without carefully calculating the relationship between the sun and the earth.

To bolster this claim he reports that the U.S. trained its bomber crews to drop their payload in 300 foot circles for three months prior to the actual attack on Japan.

"They [the bombs] could not just be dropped anytime. Everything had to be accurately calculated," he said.

link: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...estspace_b.htm

[NexusEditor]

Posted by ponda (here)

Posted by jagman (here)
The Korean Peninsula is a tenderbox .So regardless if Kim was murdered or if he died of cancer, Has the MSM reports, It makes
know difference ( One little spark could ignite a nuclear exchange! )

It might not be so simple as that.

Bruce Cathie has theorized that nukes can only be detonated at specific locations and at specific times:

Stung by both ridicule and criticism, Bruce Cathie was once asked to prove his claim of being able to predict a nuclear test. "I found that a bomb has to be detonated on a geophysical point at a particular time," he said. His reasoning for this relates to his claimed harmonic lines of force [see the work of Carl P Munck, Michael Lawrence Morton etc elsewhere on this website], or the geophysical position of the sun in relation to specific points located on the earth's surface.

Calculations carried out by Cathie led him to forecast the exact time a French nuclear test would be carried out on a remote atoll in the south pacific during 1968. Armed with his theory and mathematical knowledge, he then determined that the geophysical points of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in relationship to the sun matched precisely the timing of the American atomic bombing of these two Japanese cities at the end of World War II.

Cathie believes that it is not possible to simply conduct a nuclear explosion at any time and at any point on the world's surface, without carefully calculating the relationship between the sun and the earth.

To bolster this claim he reports that the U.S. trained its bomber crews to drop their payload in 300 foot circles for three months prior to the actual attack on Japan.

"They [the bombs] could not just be dropped anytime. Everything had to be accurately calculated," he said.

link: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...estspace_b.htm

Bruce Cathie is a good friend of mine, and I am very familiar with his research. It is my assessment (make of it what you will) that the above scenario of a-bombs only exploding at certain places at certain times USED to be true. I now believe that TPTB have the technology to achieve such detonations almost anywhere at anytime.
For those unfamiliar with Bruce's research - he postulated that the atom was 'shattered' via resonance (much like sound waves can cause crystalline glass to shatter). He was adamant that the nucleus was NOT shattered as a result of sub-critical masses being thrown together in order to achieve a critical mass and thus an atomic/nuclear explosion.
Bruce proved repeatedly in the 1970s and 1980s, that every successful nuclear detonation matched the resonance required to achieve explosion. This resonance was achieved by precise placement in both space and time.
However, technology has advanced, both behind the scenes and in the public domain. I believe that the resonance required to induce the explosion is now achievable independent of JUST space and time - ie there are enough 'windows' available to allow plenty of detonations.

Based on my personal research though, I very much doubt a full scale nuclear war will ever occur in the sense that we dreaded. There are much more practical ways of depopulating large areas, without leaving them glowing in the dark (ie useless) for centuries. Bio-racial warfare is the one to watch for, followed by modified EMP-type weapons that either incapacitate or kill humans from a distance (satellites).

peace

[DreamsInDigital]

I think one of the biggest problems with Nukes, they rip holes like big time in the time / space continuum

[ponda]

Nexus Editor said:

Based on my personal research though, I very much doubt a full scale nuclear war will ever occur in the sense that we dreaded. There are much more practical ways of depopulating large areas, without leaving them glowing in the dark (ie useless) for centuries. Bio-racial warfare is the one to watch for, followed by modified EMP-type weapons that either incapacitate or kill humans from a distance (satellites).

Trust the tptw to find a way around the detonation problem.

They've been doing a pretty good job on us by stealth anyway.

Also they might have weather control tech as well


cheers

[jagman]

Posted by ponda (here)

Posted by jagman (here)
The Korean Peninsula is a tenderbox .So regardless if Kim was murdered or if he died of cancer, Has the MSM reports, It makes
know difference ( One little spark could ignite a nuclear exchange! )

It might not be so simple as that.

Bruce Cathie has theorized that nukes can only be detonated at specific locations and at specific times:

Stung by both ridicule and criticism, Bruce Cathie was once asked to prove his claim of being able to predict a nuclear test. "I found that a bomb has to be detonated on a geophysical point at a particular time," he said. His reasoning for this relates to his claimed harmonic lines of force [see the work of Carl P Munck, Michael Lawrence Morton etc elsewhere on this website], or the geophysical position of the sun in relation to specific points located on the earth's surface.

Calculations carried out by Cathie led him to forecast the exact time a French nuclear test would be carried out on a remote atoll in the south pacific during 1968. Armed with his theory and mathematical knowledge, he then determined that the geophysical points of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in relationship to the sun matched precisely the timing of the American atomic bombing of these two Japanese cities at the end of World War II.

Cathie believes that it is not possible to simply conduct a nuclear explosion at any time and at any point on the world's surface, without carefully calculating the relationship between the sun and the earth.

To bolster this claim he reports that the U.S. trained its bomber crews to drop their payload in 300 foot circles for three months prior to the actual attack on Japan.

"They [the bombs] could not just be dropped anytime. Everything had to be accurately calculated," he said.

link: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...estspace_b.htm

Not trying to rain on your parade here but I have read Robert Oppenheimer.work
and Edward Tellers work and I have never heard this theory before.

[Chuck]

Welcome Duncan,

I just wanted to say that I have been a fan of Nexus Magazine and yourself since the late 1980s. You are a trail blazer and I appreciate your research and reasoning skills.

Good work!

[ponda]

jagman said:

Not trying to rain on your parade here but I have read Robert Oppenheimer.work
and Edward Tellers work and I have never heard this theory before.

He explains it here:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NlBXVewibHo

[NexusEditor]

Posted by jagman (here)

Posted by ponda (here)

Posted by jagman (here)
The Korean Peninsula is a tenderbox .So regardless if Kim was murdered or if he died of cancer, Has the MSM reports, It makes
know difference ( One little spark could ignite a nuclear exchange! )

It might not be so simple as that.

Bruce Cathie has theorized that nukes can only be detonated at specific locations and at specific times:

Stung by both ridicule and criticism, Bruce Cathie was once asked to prove his claim of being able to predict a nuclear test. "I found that a bomb has to be detonated on a geophysical point at a particular time," he said. His reasoning for this relates to his claimed harmonic lines of force [see the work of Carl P Munck, Michael Lawrence Morton etc elsewhere on this website], or the geophysical position of the sun in relation to specific points located on the earth's surface.

Calculations carried out by Cathie led him to forecast the exact time a French nuclear test would be carried out on a remote atoll in the south pacific during 1968. Armed with his theory and mathematical knowledge, he then determined that the geophysical points of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in relationship to the sun matched precisely the timing of the American atomic bombing of these two Japanese cities at the end of World War II.

Cathie believes that it is not possible to simply conduct a nuclear explosion at any time and at any point on the world's surface, without carefully calculating the relationship between the sun and the earth.

To bolster this claim he reports that the U.S. trained its bomber crews to drop their payload in 300 foot circles for three months prior to the actual attack on Japan.

"They [the bombs] could not just be dropped anytime. Everything had to be accurately calculated," he said.

link: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...estspace_b.htm

Not trying to rain on your parade here but I have read Robert Oppenheimer.work
and Edward Tellers work and I have never heard this theory before.

Oppenheimer and Teller are mainstream - Bruce Cathie's research was and is below the mainstream radar horizon. Unless you are a dedicated researcher into 'below the horizon' science - of course you will have never heard of it.
His work was studiously avoided by mainstream science, despite the fact that he was repeatedly invited to participate in behind-the-scenes work on this very subject. He has written several books which are still available, both second-hand and new - wherein he outlines all his mathematics and reasoning.
I highly recommend people with an attention span and who are confident with mathematics to get his books, read the articles on the internet, and then use his Gridworks software technology to discover your own geometric and harmonic 'hotspots' around the planet. After all, he chose to put it all into the public domain, rather than take the security oath and join them. The ONLY reason it is not talked about - is because so few bother to take the time to understand it.
Even Bill and Kerry, when they came to Australia, spoke at our Nexus Conference, and stayed in my house - I gave them both a DVD and other info with the plea for them to expose his work to the world. What did you hear? Nothing. Why? Because it was too much to understand and too hard to make others understand it. Therein lies the problem with publicising his work.

peace

[Mark]

Posted by NexusEditor (here)
peace to you all

Thank you for sharing your perspective and also for the work you do bringing this information to the Public.

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
So what if I'm not up to snuff on the last German/Russian alliance, personally I just find this whole exercise rather amusing. All this posturing is the biggest dog and pony act out there. Russia and US have been allies for decades now, and yet publicly sling mud at each other. Germany is just a happy little player in the whole game , North Korea wont throw Nukes and nor will US, because the Benevolents just wont let us destroy ourselves like that. They've already made that crystal clear.

It`s actually quite the big deal and potentially a red herring, as Russia is tending more toward the east (China) and southwest Asia (Iran) than Germany who, btw, is quite a bit more than à happy little player in the whole game`. Germany is a central player in the game of Nations and has significant influence amongst the PTW and never lost WW II, never declared defeat. The Nazi`s became International and probably inter-planetary, while still retaining ties to their `nation of origin`.

We will see what is `allowed`or not. Nukes have gone off many times since WWII and there has been little done by `Benevolents`in those cases. Fukishima can be seen as the equivalent of a nuclear attack in what will potentially be a terrible cost in human lives and environmental destruction, and yet, it was `àllowed`to happen as well.

[Calz]

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
We will see what is `allowed`or not. Nukes have gone off many times since WWII and there has been little done by `Benevolents`in those cases. Fukishima can be seen as the equivalent of a nuclear attack in what will potentially be a terrible cost in human lives and environmental destruction, and yet, it was `àllowed`to happen as well.

I can only add 2nd hand information on this one from "guidance" brought through by a trusted friend suggesting the damage at Fukishima (although "allowed") was "managed" by "benevolents". The suggestion being it would have been dramatically worse if left to it's own.



I do believe there is "management" if you wish to use DW's words regarding higher level beings who let the humans play in the sandbox and, despite allowing for making a mess of things to learn, will not let the damage go beyond a point that threatens Gaia.

Perhaps that is naive on my behalf ... but there you go.

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by ponda (here)
Also they might have weather control tech as well
cheers

They've got Weather control, what do you think HAARP is? It's Weather Control Technology. And, they also have earth quake weapons. Haiti was a test run, then they used it against New Zealand, when the PTW got told to "Sodd Off" when they come looking for payments, then they used it on Fukushima which was originally targeted for Tokyo, but got deflected. Apparently not fast enough though because the intent was to deflect it into the ocean a little further than it was. Japan was just threatened again very recently with more Earthquake And Tsunami attacks if they don't "play nice." with the same people they're fighting against.

@ Rahkyt,
Never claimed or said the Benevolents were infallible, but they've already demonstrated on many different accounts over the past near 60 years at least, that they can and will shut down the Nukes if we even as much as think about using them. They weren't just "testing" their prowess when they did it all over the world the past 60 years, they were sending a message. I am sure beyond the greatest depths of my very soul, they will not let us destroy ourselves or eachother with Nukes, they just wont. To many sources out there that back this up, and make it blatantly obvious.

[ponda]

DreamsInDigital said:

They've got Weather control, what do you think HAARP is? It's Weather Control Technology. And, they also have earth quake weapons. Haiti was a test run, then they used it against New Zealand, when the PTW got told to "Sodd Off" when they come looking for payments, then they used it on Fukushima which was originally targeted for Tokyo, but got deflected. Apparently not fast enough though because the intent was to deflect it into the ocean a little further than it was. Japan was just threatened again very recently with more Earthquake And Tsunami attacks if they don't "play nice." with the same people they're fighting against.

Yeah i agree with you about haarp and possible quake weapons but there might be other aspects to some of the quake activity around the globe besides haarp or naturally occurring quakes

cheers

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by ponda (here)
Yeah i agree with you about haarp and possible quake weapons but there might be other aspects to some of the quake activity around the globe besides haarp or naturally occurring quakes
cheers

Yes, there is quite a lot going on. Aside from those, there are the DUMBs that are being blown up by the Reptilian/Greys (blowing their own up on the way out), the Benevolents are blowing up other DUMBs and Undersea Basis, then you also have the forces fighting the Cabal that are destroying some of them. That's about the other explanation for the rest of them, then of course dear old planet earth is going through the transition like everyone else so it's shifting and settling and expanding in places.

[Carmody]

Posted by Cottage Rose (here)

Posted by NexusEditor (here)
One other thing people on these forums need to realise, is that compartmentalisation of information and intel implies inherently that any 'insider whistleblower' can ONLY reveal what he/she has been told to be true, or what they have personally experienced to be true. Compartmentalisation of intel is PRIMARILY designed to keep intel agents in the dark about the bigger pictures - EVEN THOUGH they are fed intel about these bigger pictures - they are usually 'tainted' with disinfo, so that IF someone leaks, the leaker is identified by the specific 'taint' fed to them. Trusting ANY insider who gives intel outside their personal experience realm is a no-brainer - you simply HAVE to take it with a grain of salt. That intel is 99% fed to them from OUTSIDE their personal experience realm. This is what got the credibility of Bob Lazar into question in the early days when he came out - ie he let out some of the 'background briefing' info he was told - the info that surrounded the specific technical matter he was dealing with. That background briefing info was tainted with specifics enough to not only identify Lazar to his employers, but also to make him look a fool in the 'real science world'.

Thank you, NexusEditor. This is an important consideration. We must put the pieces of a puzzle together with personal verification and discernment as best we can in this paradigm, not expecting 100% accuracy from any witness considering the difficulty of the positions they are in.

To me, the idea of compartmentalization and tainted or tagged info was always a 'given' consideration. No-one is, at those levels... foolish enough to give or allow anyone large slices of pie to hand out to whomever they may please. Every now and then you run into someone who really knows something...some important bit of connective tissue... but that usually ends quite fast.

[Carmody]

Posted by NexusEditor (here)

Posted by jagman (here)

Posted by ponda (here)

Posted by jagman (here)
The Korean Peninsula is a tenderbox .So regardless if Kim was murdered or if he died of cancer, Has the MSM reports, It makes
know difference ( One little spark could ignite a nuclear exchange! )

It might not be so simple as that.

Bruce Cathie has theorized that nukes can only be detonated at specific locations and at specific times:

Stung by both ridicule and criticism, Bruce Cathie was once asked to prove his claim of being able to predict a nuclear test. "I found that a bomb has to be detonated on a geophysical point at a particular time," he said. His reasoning for this relates to his claimed harmonic lines of force [see the work of Carl P Munck, Michael Lawrence Morton etc elsewhere on this website], or the geophysical position of the sun in relation to specific points located on the earth's surface.

Calculations carried out by Cathie led him to forecast the exact time a French nuclear test would be carried out on a remote atoll in the south pacific during 1968. Armed with his theory and mathematical knowledge, he then determined that the geophysical points of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in relationship to the sun matched precisely the timing of the American atomic bombing of these two Japanese cities at the end of World War II.

Cathie believes that it is not possible to simply conduct a nuclear explosion at any time and at any point on the world's surface, without carefully calculating the relationship between the sun and the earth.

To bolster this claim he reports that the U.S. trained its bomber crews to drop their payload in 300 foot circles for three months prior to the actual attack on Japan.

"They [the bombs] could not just be dropped anytime. Everything had to be accurately calculated," he said.

link: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...estspace_b.htm

Not trying to rain on your parade here but I have read Robert Oppenheimer.work
and Edward Tellers work and I have never heard this theory before.

Oppenheimer and Teller are mainstream - Bruce Cathie's research was and is below the mainstream radar horizon. Unless you are a dedicated researcher into 'below the horizon' science - of course you will have never heard of it.
His work was studiously avoided by mainstream science, despite the fact that he was repeatedly invited to participate in behind-the-scenes work on this very subject. He has written several books which are still available, both second-hand and new - wherein he outlines all his mathematics and reasoning.
I highly recommend people with an attention span and who are confident with mathematics to get his books, read the articles on the internet, and then use his Gridworks software technology to discover your own geometric and harmonic 'hotspots' around the planet. After all, he chose to put it all into the public domain, rather than take the security oath and join them. The ONLY reason it is not talked about - is because so few bother to take the time to understand it.
Even Bill and Kerry, when they came to Australia, spoke at our Nexus Conference, and stayed in my house - I gave them both a DVD and other info with the plea for them to expose his work to the world. What did you hear? Nothing. Why? Because it was too much to understand and too hard to make others understand it. Therein lies the problem with publicising his work.

peace

I have posited here on this forum that the hans coler device will only work in specific alignments ..or that it must be constructed and tuned to work in the specific location..and that it is best to start with it being in an ideal location in the first place. the right grid point and then tuned for that specific location/design/orientation. If it is moved to a new location, it will fail to work.

as well, the tuning of the bismuth and aluminum sheet over unity device, the 'fluxgenerator', works the same. It must be tuned to resonate in the specific location it is at..and then it works.

I have gone further than that in illustrating how grid lines are the points upon which major salt, crystal, etc deposits..all happen on grid lines and at grid line vortex meeting points. over and over again, this is the situation and effect. And much more. Underground base points, dimensional crossing points, grid lines that favor specific types of dimensionals, oriented and placed edifices, pyramids, portals, etc. and on and on. gestation of psychics on grid lines and vortex points.. The list is nearly endless.

University of Chicago, IIRC, the original experiments for the atomic works. that is a yang grid line, for example.

Edit: everything I contribute to this forum has to do with understanding the existence of the grid lines and dimensional energies begin required to be of the correct type and orientation, astrology, etc. Part and parcel of existing, in all ways. Including the dimensional/spiritual connection, as a core consideration. Eg, I awake at dawn, the exact dawn, the moment the spirit enters the body again, ie the ascendant in astrology, the moment the 'soul' unites with the body. If one read all my 'informational' posts -which are the vast majority that I have here- they all speak on these aspects of connection and understanding.

[modwiz]

Posted by Cottage Rose (here)

Posted by AlternativeInfoJunkie (here)
Haha newbies!

Sorry, at considerably more than twice your age.... not a newbie.
I saw JFK assassinated and all the history in between to attain this perspective.

I think he was directing that remark to Nexus editor, a provisional member. Just a hunch. Call me Quasimodo.

[modwiz]

Posted by truth4me (here)

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
How can Kissinger realize anything if as it is believed, that Kissinger is a clone and has been since sometime in the late '70's after his plane disappeared off radar during his return trip from London's Heathrow Airport. Is this something Ben is unaware of?

I was thinking the same thing about Kissinger being a clone....

Clones inherit the history and functions of the original, no?

[modwiz]

Posted by Rahkyt (here)

Posted by NexusEditor (here)
peace to you all

Thank you for sharing your perspective and also for the work you do bringing this information to the Public.

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
So what if I'm not up to snuff on the last German/Russian alliance, personally I just find this whole exercise rather amusing. All this posturing is the biggest dog and pony act out there. Russia and US have been allies for decades now, and yet publicly sling mud at each other. Germany is just a happy little player in the whole game , North Korea wont throw Nukes and nor will US, because the Benevolents just wont let us destroy ourselves like that. They've already made that crystal clear.

It`s actually quite the big deal and potentially a red herring, as Russia is tending more toward the east (China) and southwest Asia (Iran) than Germany who, btw, is quite a bit more than à happy little player in the whole game`. Germany is a central player in the game of Nations and has significant influence amongst the PTW and never lost WW II, never declared defeat. The Nazi`s became International and probably inter-planetary, while still retaining ties to their `nation of origin`.

We will see what is `allowed`or not. Nukes have gone off many times since WWII and there has been little done by `Benevolents`in those cases. Fukishima can be seen as the equivalent of a nuclear attack in what will potentially be a terrible cost in human lives and environmental destruction, and yet, it was `àllowed`to happen as well.

Agreed with Fukushima being a nuke attack equivalent. They did have to get creative and do a workaround though, didn't they? A snack for thought.

[modwiz]

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)

Posted by ponda (here)
Also they might have weather control tech as well
cheers

They've got Weather control, what do you think HAARP is? It's Weather Control Technology. And, they also have earth quake weapons. Haiti was a test run, then they used it against New Zealand, when the PTW got told to "Sodd Off" when they come looking for payments, then they used it on Fukushima which was originally targeted for Tokyo, but got deflected. Apparently not fast enough though because the intent was to deflect it into the ocean a little further than it was. Japan was just threatened again very recently with more Earthquake And Tsunami attacks if they don't "play nice." with the same people they're fighting against.

@ Rahkyt,
Never claimed or said the Benevolents were infallible, but they've already demonstrated on many different accounts over the past near 60 years at least, that they can and will shut down the Nukes if we even as much as think about using them. They weren't just "testing" their prowess when they did it all over the world the past 60 years, they were sending a message. I am sure beyond the greatest depths of my very soul, they will not let us destroy ourselves or eachother with Nukes, they just wont. To many sources out there that back this up, and make it blatantly obvious.

I have been following HAARP reading for a year or so now.I have never seen it so quiet up at Gakona, Alaska:http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/...er/gak-mag.cgi. Interestingly, the number if worldwide EQ's has subsided a bit. My belief is the lack of funds the Khazarians are experiencing has led to a financial inability to run the billion watt apparatus.

BTW, Khazarian is brilliant. It really cleans up language around the problem.