+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Possible Attack on Iran??

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member David Trd1's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th October 2011
    Language
    English
    Age
    39
    Posts
    413
    Thanks
    4,681
    Thanked 2,381 times in 351 posts

    Default Possible Attack on Iran??

    Propoganda or Pot stirring by The US military.
    Make of it what you will.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1hHS4MZy5

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to David Trd1 For This Post:

    baddbob (23rd December 2011), buckminster fuller (24th December 2011), GaelVictor (23rd December 2011), Referee (23rd December 2011), toad (23rd December 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Australia Avalon Member Blake Elder's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Age
    52
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    255
    Thanked 101 times in 33 posts

    Default Re: Possible Attack on Iran??

    Seems this report is a rehash of an older story

    http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2011/1...ews-on-us.html

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Blake Elder For This Post:

    toad (23rd December 2011)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Avalon Member toad's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th November 2011
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Age
    38
    Posts
    669
    Thanks
    310
    Thanked 1,474 times in 472 posts

    Default Re: Possible Attack on Iran??

    The dailymail!? They say they quoted the IRNA, yet there is no headline on the IRNA of any missile strike or violation of airspace by any US or UK aircraft.

    Quote Posted by Blake Elder (here)
    Seems this report is a rehash of an older story

    http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2011/1...ews-on-us.html

    HAHA DailyFAIL!
    Last edited by toad; 23rd December 2011 at 01:07.
    The minute you settle for less than you deserve, you get even less than you settled for.
    -- Maureen Dowd --

  6. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member Truthseeker512's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th July 2010
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 650 times in 90 posts

    Default Re: Possible Attack on Iran??

    Story comes from Kurt Nimmo over at infowars. Its a bit dodgy me thinks considering the source is IRNA and they say nothing about it

  7. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th December 2010
    Posts
    59
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 113 times in 37 posts

    Default Re: Possible Attack on Iran??

    This was reported in the Telegraph (UK) yesterday. Wasn't sure about posting it as was worried about the noise to signal ratio, so glad you brought it up David.

    Merry Yuletide

    xxx T

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...with-Iran.html

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to taliesin For This Post:

    David Trd1 (23rd December 2011), Ishtar (24th December 2011)

  9. Link to Post #6
    UK Avalon Member Ishtar's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st October 2011
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    1,660
    Thanked 3,307 times in 610 posts

    Default Re: Possible Attack on Iran??

    I think what we're now witnessing is the media gearing itself up for the disinfo drive end game which will trigger WWIII.

    This from Al Arabiya News.

    Quote Sky News led with the news that the Muslim Brotherhood is claiming responsibility for the bombings in Damascus, which they got from a report on a false website set up by Syrian intelligence. The Muslim Brotherhood are denying it yria’s Muslim Brotherhood has denied any involvement in Friday’s bomb attack in Damascus that killed 44 people, Al Arabiya reported Saturday afternoon.

    The group rejected an earlier claim reported by AFP in which it cited the the Brotherhood as claiming responsibility for the attacks based on a statement on its website, which the group said is fake.

    The website is the work of the Syrian intelligence trying to drag the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood into the crisis a source close to the party told Al Arabiya.
    This is just an excuse for Israel (or someone) to hit Iran with a thermonuclear strike.

    Meanwhile, while Obama distracted everyone with a big "Welcome Home" speech to some American troops, thousands of them didn't get to go home at all, but were marched into Kuwait to await further orders.

    My money's on Boxing Day.
    Last edited by Ishtar; 24th December 2011 at 11:37.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Ishtar For This Post:

    grapevine (24th December 2011)

  11. Link to Post #7
    Great Britain Avalon Member Free Bird's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    London
    Age
    59
    Posts
    78
    Thanks
    162
    Thanked 288 times in 66 posts

    Talking Re: Possible Attack on Iran??

    This from Reuters on Thursday
    Quote U.S. sets bounty for Iran-based al Qaeda financier

    WASHINGTON | Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:39pm GMT

    (Reuters) - The United States on Thursday announced it was establishing a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to Yasin al-Suri, who is accused of operating from Iran as a facilitator and financier for al Qaeda.

    The bounty is the first offered for an al Qaeda financier and is aimed at disrupting a financial network that has operated from within Iran's borders since 2005, said Eytan Fisch, a senior Treasury Department official.

    Robert Hartung, a senior State Department official, said that under an agreement between al Qaeda and the government of Iran, al-Suri had helped move money and recruits through Iran to al Qaeda leaders in neighboring countries.

    Hartung said al-Suri, who is originally from Syria, also was known as Ezedin Abdel Aziz Khalil.

    The U.S. Treasury Department in July blacklisted al-Suri and five other members of his network, exposing what the United States says are direct links between Tehran and the al Qaeda network.

    Hartung said al-Suri's network serves as an important conduit for channeling both money and fighters from around the Middle East to al Qaeda leaders in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.

    "He is a dedicated terrorist working in support of al Qaeda with the support of the government of Iran," Hartung said. "As a key fundraiser for the al Qaeda terrorist network, he is a continuing danger to the interests of the United States."

    Since 1984 the U.S. Rewards for Justice program has paid more than $100 million to more than 70 people who provided credible information that either prevented terrorist attacks or helped bring accused terrorists to justice, the State Department's Hartung said.

    (Reporting By Andrew Quinn; Editing by Sandra Maler)
    Firstly, what is strange about this is that the official narrative about al Qaeda has always associated it with radical Sunni Muslims - Iran is dominated by the Twelver Shia branch of Islam, which is the official state religion and to which about 90% to 95% of Iranians belong. Shias and Sunnis tend not to get along.... So why would Iran harbour an al Qaeda financier ... that alone doesn't make sense? Besides, anyone who has done any research knows that al Qaeda was brought into existence by recruiting Saudi Arabian Wahhabists - a branch of Sunni Islam and was funded by US intelligence.

    Secondly, a $10 million bounty for a guy hiding in Iran? This implies he would have to be captured and "brought to justice". The only way that would be possible is if the US had full access to Iran .... which can only mean invasion ....

    The tempo of rhetoric is rapidly increasing and a strike over the winter holidays would have maximum coverage and catch people's attention around the globe.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts