Thrive Movie & Foster Gamble Interview Asked About The Illuminati Poster Symbolism

[charlesfrith]

I've posted their breaking interview on Time Monk Radio here:

http://www.charlesfrith.com/2011/12/...-answered.html

Please leave a comment there if you have any thoughts or feedback. Thanks Avalon forum.

charles

[Sirius White]

Problem is people use 17th century moniker to attribute to todays corruption. Illuminati in the past were mostly "Good."

Today, because of the Jeudeo-Christian interpretation of blamin everything on "Illuminati" because of Freemasonic beliefs in Lucifer, they have become disinformed on the truth. Whoever the top of these people are, they do not call themselves "Illuminati."

At the highest levels of Rosy Cross order, and also the old "Illuminati" of 17thcentury were not bad!

The Vatican should be payed more attention to, they have been the ones suppressing and manipulating the most important truth of all! The spiritual truth! Which bank do you think controls the others!? Stop looking for scapegoats.

Now I will listen to this interview

Also most people don't understand the truth of the ancient knowledge. People think its all Satan worship... LOL.

The symbol of the hair covering the eye is an Egyptian tradition of showing a neophyte. Somebody who has not been yet initiated into the ancient mysteries, hence not fit to truly handle their role as leaders/citizens. It is when one is initiated into the true mysteries that their hair is lifted/cut in order to "see." In the thrive movie they are lifting the blindfold that previously only had "one eye" seeing out.

You see, seeing with "one eye" is what most people unfortunately have going on. This polarizes them either with the right or left eye, which is essentially extremism. Which you find with new agers, and conspiracy theorists for example- who each polarize to each side.

Lifting the "veil" covering one eye but allowing the other, is to see with both eyes, hence both hemispheres, and lifting the veil of duality- which is TRUE slavery.

[charlesfrith]

Thanks for your comment. I agree with your analysis and think that symbolism has been adopted with different intents over the ages. Indeed I think the subconscious adoption in this instance is an example of taking back the symbolism for the good.

[grapevine]

From Foster & Kimberly Proctor - as in Proctor & Gamble? You're kidding me . . .