(New!) Project Camelot: Bill Wood : Above & Beyond Project Looking Glass

[toothpick]

Lots of opinons and discussion, just love it you guys.
imo I felt that what he was sayng rang true for me, just a gut feeling, but you really need to pick up on those intutions especially right now.
I do believe we could use another 1/2 dozen patriots just like him.
Good timing Billy Wood.

[winston smith1971]

If its true or not all of what Bill Wood says, what he says about one false flag bringing in the National Defense Authorization Act with a vengeance is true and scary. Imagine people like Bill and Kerry or any one of us disappearing with out anyone's knowledge to be detained indefinitely, with no legal representation or even family members being informed.
"U.S. Congressman Justin Amash states in a letter to Congress:

The Senate’s [bill] does not even distinguish between American citizens and non-citizens, or between persons caught domestically and abroad. The President’s power, in his discretion, to detain persons he determines have supported associated forces applies just as strongly to Americans seized on U.S. soil as it does to foreigners captured on a far away battlefield.

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson – General Colin Powell’s chief of staff – says that the bill is a big step towards tyranny at home. Congressman Ron Paul says that it will establish martial law in America.
Indeed, Amash accuses lawmakers of attempting to intentionally mislead the American people by writing a bill which appears at first glance to exclude U.S. citizens, when it actually includes us:

Pres. Obama and many Members of Congress believe the President ALREADY has the authority the bill grants him. Legally, of course, he does not. This language was inserted to keep proponents and opponents of the bill appeased, while permitting the President to assert that the improper power he has claimed all along is now in statute.

***

They will say that American citizens are specifically exempted under the following language in Sec. 1032: “The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.” Don’t be fooled. All this says is that the President is not REQUIRED to indefinitely detain American citizens without charge or trial. It still PERMITS him to do so."

[Lazlo]

Posted by EnergyGardener (here)

Posted by Nerge (here)

I got a genuine vibe from him and respect him for coming forward. Perhaps it's worth reflecting on what these people often go through and risk by putting their necks on the line to talk about these topics, before judging so quick and harshly.

Constructive skepticism is fine, but many posts on here really seem to have a venom to them and a guilty until proven innocent style; If I'm ever in court I hope they're not on the jury.

Despite what people's opinions are, I think he clearly started she was 16 at the time, which was also technically legal at the time too - regardless of what each person's personal opinion is; perhaps those so quick to judge have no skeletons in their closets - so-to-speak - and are perfect? The guy has guts for putting it all out there, warts and all.

Crikey, if I was in his situation and putting my life at risk to get this info out and this was the reception, well, talk about gratitude.

If you don't believe him, fine, but at least show some respect in how you express it, as it often reflects more on you than it ever will the person you're judging - especially with some of the venom filled posts I've seen on here.

Now having said that, here's a

Nerge,

This is an excellent example of, "No good deed ever goes unpunished."

I acknowledge that it took great courage for Bill Wood to first acknowledge his mistakes, and of course, the obligatory "fiction" book announcement, which we now understand the purpose of. It is apparent that he is a very though guy, considering his remarkable survival to date. I do hope that he knows of our appreciation and is exhilarated understanding the accomplishment of his disclosure (I have forwarded to more than one skeptic myself), that it was well worth the negative noise from this thread.

Yet, are we are making it more difficult to compel the next whistle-blower to come forward?

It is my hope that Kerry and our other Camelot friends did not lose heart and courage of their noble purpose by the responses above.

If you are going to get on camera and make extraordinary claims, surely you must expect some intense scrutiny. If no one ever looked critically at such whistleblowers, we would be left with an ever bigger mess of contradictory and unmanageable "information" to sift through in our collective search for the truth.

I agree that Bill Wood, and many other whistleblowers, have shown incredible courage in coming forward. But just because he has shown such courage, it does not mean that he should be given a free pass when it comes to examining both the testimony and the giver of said testimony. I do not believe that he is being dishonest about many of his experiences, nor do I believe that he knows as much as he thinks he does.

This is fresh information, and is generating good discussion, but this is certainly not THE definitive disclosure or witness.

[Nenuphar]

How long has Looking Glass technology been in use on earth? Is the information relayed by it in visual form only, or in auditory form as well? Is there a way of "saving" or documenting the information/visuals it conveys? (Other than doing a video recording of what it's showing)

Newbie questions, admittedly.

[Fire Dragon]

I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a something troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 minutes to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 minutes between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 minutes.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

[EnergyGardener]

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Perhaps he is taking into consideration the time it takes to drive to the spaceport, park your car, check your bags, go through the start-up sequence, get space clearance, then the same on the other side upon arrival. Just a guess.

[Fire Dragon]

Posted by EnergyGardener (here)

Perhaps he is taking into consideration the time it takes to drive to the spaceport, park your car, check your bags, go through the start-up sequence, get space clearance, then the same on the other side upon arrival. Just a guess.

well i was just having this same train of thought after posting, i see your point thanks

[winston smith1971]

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Wow Fire Dragon had exactly the same thought Ive gone wrong somewhere i thought it would take 22mins at mars' furthest distance.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by EnergyGardener (here)

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Perhaps he is taking into consideration the time it takes to drive to the spaceport, park your car, check your bags, go through the start-up sequence, get space clearance, then the same on the other side upon arrival. Just a guess.

Yes but still 24hrs he hasn't got a clue how long it would take.

[gooty64]

You should ask Barry Soretero how long in took him when he went to mars back in 1980.

Posted by winston smith1971 (here)

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Wow Fire Dragon had exactly the same thought Ive gone wrong somewhere i thought it would take 22mins at mars' furthest distance.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by EnergyGardener (here)

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Perhaps he is taking into consideration the time it takes to drive to the spaceport, park your car, check your bags, go through the start-up sequence, get space clearance, then the same on the other side upon arrival. Just a guess.

Yes but still 24hrs he hasn't got a clue how long it would take.

[Fire Dragon]

Posted by winston smith1971 (here)
Wow Fire Dragon had exactly the same thought Ive gone wrong somewhere i thought it would take 22mins at mars' furthest distance.
.

yes i noticed your post on the other thread too, same thought same time lol
and yes your right about 22 minutes, it seems i got my minutes and seconds mixed up in my post

[sygh]

Posted by sigma6 (here)

Posted by Mulder (here)
I've just listened to the whole interview and I enjoyed it very much. Bill Wood is extremely positive saying the "good-guys have already won" and the world is just playing out the last few chess moves to accomplish this!!

I enjoyed his explanations of timelines 1 ("ascension") and 2 ("a catastrophe that sends people underground") and his opinions on CERN - that it is "not allowed" to be fully activated. I remember what Delores Cannon said about living on the French/Swiss Border - so I'll keep away from this part of the world just in-case!

Got my curiosity Mulder, what exactly did Delores say about Swiss/French border? I have heard there is a prophecy (tied to Nostradamus) saying that there might be a black hole type devastation... ?

I made a couple of changes on the post and it ended up posting twice. Go figure. Sorry. Please delete this Moderator, please? Thank you.

[sygh]

[QUOTE=sygh;408098]

Posted by sigma6 (here)

Posted by Mulder (here)
I've just listened to the whole interview and I enjoyed it very much. Bill Wood is extremely positive saying the "good-guys have already won" and the world is just playing out the last few chess moves to accomplish this!!

I enjoyed his explanations of timelines 1 ("ascension") and 2 ("a catastrophe that sends people underground") and his opinions on CERN - that it is "not allowed" to be fully activated. I remember what Delores Cannon said about living on the French/Swiss Border - so I'll keep away from this part of the world just in-case!

Got my curiosity Mulder, what exactly did Delores say about Swiss/French border? I have heard there is a prophecy (tied to Nostradamus) saying that there might be a black hole type devastation... ?

Cannon also said she was absolutely certain Sardon meant Saddam. Don't have time to delve into whether or not she was accurate, does anyone else know?

Nostradamus also told everyone to get the heck out of the area around Lake Geneva. Said there would be a betrayal coming from one amongst those meeting there (G8?). Said there woud be signs in the sky prior to the advent. Could be CERN. Whatrever it is, it sounds like an atomic blast of some sort. But temperature is the measurement of the movement (hecticity -my own word) of electrons in anything. Could be HAARP too, because HAARP is an atomic enactor of sorts. Anything that sturs things into a frinzy at the atomic level, be it chemical or frequent makes for the reactive at the atomic level.

As to Wood...
I agree with several here as to not jumping to conclusions based solely on one interview. Best to just stay alert. My awareness is up right now. I feel like we all want to be able to digest what Wood is saying here. Now that he has made public the information he wanted to share, we have the oppportunity to confirm, or, disprove the information he gave us. I get the idea he would appreciate it, as it would be knowledge for him as well.

One way would be to find out if CERN is being held back. I'd also like to know what would happen if CERN were hit by a weapon like the little pleutonium bombs the US has (that makes me sick to say it). In other words, does the existence of CERN as a target put the whole area at the kind of risk Nostrodamus refers to?

At any rate, I think Bill Wood is on the level -at face value. I watched his demeanor. I looked for body clues as to his sincerity. I delved out to try to discern where his energy was coming from. These are things we can tell from watching an interview. I didn't pay attention to Kerry, as I thought Kerry was doing her best to ask the question and then, fold up to listen to the answer. I believe I even saw her put her head down, and fold her hands in front of her several times after asking a question, in order to give Wood the stage.



Nostradamas also said : "The big engine [of time] renews the centuries,"

[jaybee]

.


David Wilcock is going to be co-hosting the live Q & A on Tuesday...

From Kerry on the Camelot Forum...


http://camelotforum.com/index.php?op...401&Itemid=164

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: REGARDING TUESDAY, JANUARY 24th 7pm PST:

LIVESTREAM Q&A WITH BILL WOOD & GUEST CO-HOST DAVID WILCOCK

David will be joining me to co-host this special Q&A. The viewers will be able to type questions into the chat...

FREE.... donations requested but not required.. This event will be dedicated to raising awareness and also gathering signatures for a Petition protesting the NDAA recently signed by Obama...

***

A NOTE TO EVERYONE OUT THERE WHO THINKS BILL WOOD IS HIS REAL NAME....NOT!!!

Just fyi... he's a whistleblower trying to hold on to some remnant of safety... no doubt someone will blow his cover... but maybe not for a while.

[onawah]

Thanks for that, jaybee.
Nice of Kerry to do this on a donation basis.

[Unified Serenity]

Posted by DNA (here)

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
I'm taking the guy at his word, he blames the military for using it against him, but he never says it was a bad move or even feels badly about it. So, he gives off the impression he knew and it was legal and therefore ok, or he was duped and it's all her fault. Sounds typical of a sociopath to me, but that's just a gut feeling.

This actually makes his story more believeable to me. It is well known that the CIA likes to use folks in sensitive positions and positions of power that they have something on.(sex offender status)
This is one of those things you learn as you traverse all of this.
For instance the The Conspiracy of Silence Video shows a child prostitution ring that is used for Washington DC socialites. This goes hand in hand with MKULTRA mind control as discussed by Cathy O'Brien
You are actually playing right into TPTB's hands by discounting this story out of hand because the guy is not squeaky clean. This is what they want you to do. And you are reacting just like you have been programmed to react to this kind of information.


If you want to get to the truth Serenity, you are going to have to challange your comfort zone.
Not every whistle blower is going to be a shiny knight in armor with a perfect resume of heroism and shivalry.

A jerk is still a jerk. Spraypaint a turd gold and it's still a turd. I am well aware of these tactics and your comments don't surprise me. The lack of moral ethics and justification by some is what surprises me. I also don't accept the whole "ascension" message so that plays into my end viewpoint on the interview. We may disagree on that issue. To me it's more propaganda all the way around, plain and simple. Yes, by all means let's each have our banner of the day to run off the same cliff and feel self righteous doing so while the elites laugh their collective asses off at us.

Most people are programmed to need a savior, to need something in the form of religion be it standard religion, environmentalism, humanism, and now we see the coming new dawn of dna upgrades, ascension ascension ascension, can't stop what's coming. Repeat it long and loud enough and people buy it hook line and sinker.

I'm glad for the interview, it just seems more distractions and no more truth. Just more mental masturbation and back patting on how smart we all are. I love you all though I know I can be hard at times. One day we will all see clearly and then we can be one. Until then the elites are just playing us from every angle.

Much love,

Serenity

[Unified Serenity]

Posted by EnergyGardener (here)

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Perhaps he is taking into consideration the time it takes to drive to the spaceport, park your car, check your bags, go through the start-up sequence, get space clearance, then the same on the other side upon arrival. Just a guess.

And let's not forget the TSA patdown!

[jaybee]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)

Posted by EnergyGardener (here)

Posted by Fire Dragon (here)
I am watching this for the second time now, and there is a sth troubling me at the 1:58:00 part. He is claiming that it is possible to travel to Mars "just below the speed of light" , then Kerry asks how long would it take suggesting and hour, but he states within a day.
It takes light 8 minutes to reach the earth from the sun and the distance between the 2 is 150 million km, and i think 12 seconds to reach mars from the sun the distance between mar and the sun being 228 million km.
Now the distance between the earth and mars ranges between 56 million km and 401 million km depending on their positions to each other around the sun.
Therefore if we took the furthest distance of 401 million km between the earth and mars light would take around 22 seconds between to travel this distance, and at half the speed of light would take 44 seconds.

These are just rough calculations i have done, and i am not a scientist, so i am asking here if my thinking is flawed?

Perhaps he is taking into consideration the time it takes to drive to the spaceport, park your car, check your bags, go through the start-up sequence, get space clearance, then the same on the other side upon arrival. Just a guess.

And let's not forget the TSA patdown!

and the instructions for an emergency exit....

but maybe an emergency exit into space isn't such a good idea...so scrub that


.

[sygh]

I get your point loud and clear, serenity. Morals are a must.

Unfortunately most of us fall short of the line but we try very hard. Of course, there actually are times where someone wants you to hold up their sense of morality, even going as far as checking to see if you have driven anywhere by touching the engine of your car to see if it's warm before they ask you. Looking in the trash can to see if you are corresponding with someone, opening your mail, listening to your phone calls, etc... this sort of thing almost makes you want to do something wrong. But you aren't talking about that. Sorry, I went off course.

I won't try to change your mind but I noticed no one had mentioned that Bill stated he thought she was 25. Hold on, I'll find the time on the interview, if it's there.


Well, I thought I heard him say, he thought she was older but I was wrong. Kerry, did allude to it, then sort of just said she had no idea and to explain. Sorry.

[modwiz]

Where is respect for the Goddess here. Laws about age is a bunch of cultural crap, and that is why there is so much variance. I am sure she was of child bearing age. That is a huge statement from the Goddess.

What I see here is hysterics. You are either understand the Goddess or you don't. She speaks quite eloquently and unmistakably.

Puberty is Her announcement that a threshold has been passed. I think 16 would ensure that event had occurred. I've had this same argument with Wiccans and Pagans before. Emotional clouding is not to be underestimated. I will not enjoin a further discussion because I only care to debate with intellect, not emotions. Emotions are for feeling, not debating about.

The payoff of this interview is at the end.

Please feel free to fling all the poo you want at this post. I expect tantrums.

[Unified Serenity]

Posted by sygh (here)
I get your point loud and clear, serenity. Morals are a must.

Unfortunately most of us fall short of the line but we try very hard. Of course, there actually are times where someone wants you to hold up their sense of morality, even going as far as checking to see if you have driven anywhere by touching the engine of your car to see if it's warm before they ask you. Looking in the trash can to see if you are corresponding with someone, opening your mail, listening to your phone calls, etc... this sort of thing almost makes you want to do something wrong. But you aren't talking about that. Sorry, I went off course.

I won't try to change your mind but I noticed no one had mentioned that Bill stated he thought she was 25. Hold on, I'll find the time on the interview, if it's there.

I never heard him say he thought she was 25, just that he was 25. I got the definite impression that he knew she was 16, that it was legal and thus, what was the big hairy deal sort of attitude. I'm letting this all go. He has his life to live. I really did not get much from the interview. We will all know soon enough what's real and what's a show.

Goddess bless,

Serenity