Posted by etm567
(here)
Posted by Dennis Leahy
(here)
I sense that
cellardoor has a pretty good sense that nothing may happen, and will not be emotionally crushed. I actually think it's pretty brave to even entertain the notion of being among the first jumping onto an alien vessel, voluntarily. I promise not to tease cellardoor or anyone else with a ticket, but on Feb 5th I think it is fair to start a discussion about just exactly why "someone" wants people to believe that aliens are going to solve our problems.
Dennis
Sorry to respond twice, but I just realized that I did not respond to something you said that I do think deserves a response. And that is "...I think it is fair to start a discussion about just exactly why 'someone' wants people to believe that aliens are going to solve our problems."
That is said over and over and over and over again. All channeled information is not the same. it does not all say the same thing. It does not all say that "the ETs are going to beam us up and save us," or that "the ETs are gonig to go away with the cabal," or that "the ETs are going to solve all of our problems for us." So, is that a straw man or a red herring? When you always make the same accusation, irrespective of what was said in this particular, specific case?
In fact, in this case, the point is quite the opposite: that some human beings, specifically Steve Beckow and some of his friends, decided to take it upon themselves to suggest this, so as to push disclosure from our end, rather than wait for our governments to do so or for our "space brothers and sisters" to land en masse on the White House lawn, which they are not going to do. It is an effort on the part of some human beings to bring some movement to the issue instead of sitting here and waiting for them to do something.
No tractor beam was ever promised or referred to by any of these channels. Maybe you have them mixed up with someone else? I perhaps am being a little grumpy, but honestly, the reaction that comes from so many is so incredibly predictable! You all say the same thing! As if everyone who ever channeled anything said the same thing! And they do not. Hmmmph. How about turning up your hearing aid? Or listening more carefully? Or reading more carefully? Or trying to make a distinction here or there, which I'm very sure you are more than capable of doing? No.
What is so confusing about this is that all of you on that side of the discussion, the reasonable, logical one, will point out that disinformation is deliberately planted for a number of reasons, one of which is to discredit people and channels. Why bother to discredit channels if none of them are creditable? If there is an effort to discredit them, then there must be some that are legitimate, no? If there are some that are legitimate, how do we tell which ones they are?
I know how I've gone about doing it for myself, and I have put some effort into it. So hold your fire before you accuse me of blindly accepting what any channel anywhere says, and think about giving a little credit now and then to efforts made by people like Steve Beckow (you might have to check him out before you could very fairly judge him), or even think about making some distinctions for yourself rather than tossing out a blanket condemnation. When it comes down to it, really, is there much difference between blanket condemnations and blanket acceptances? I think they are both faulty.
So, for about the tenth or twentieth time it feels like, no tractor beam, no beam me up, Scotty, no solving all my problems for me or for all of mankind. Something else, something different. Could be, couldn't it?
ETM
Re: 100 people invited to go to mothership - Steve Beckow
Bookmarks