Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Why not one clear channeler? Why 50>100+?

  1. Link to Post #41
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,274
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 586 times in 161 posts

    Default Re: Why not one clear channeler? Why 50>100+?

    ljwheat...

    And where is the evidence that they were not vaporized in the process...they have not come back so we basically know planes and ships dissapeared. There are a number of logical explanations for this

    Those that lost contact and their instruments went haywired also can be explained by anomalies...think what happens to satelites when we receive gamma bursts or solar CMEs

    Not convinced at all....for me is all mambo jumbo

  2. Link to Post #42
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th February 2012
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 9 times in 2 posts

    Default Re: Why not one clear channeler? Why 50>100+?

    Astral tricksters abound. Ultimate discernment is warranted

    A cautionary tale which is a must-read for anyone tempted to believe **anything** these channelled messages have to say, is "The Siren Call of Hungry Ghosts: A Riveting Investigation Into Channeling and Spirit Guides " (amazon page: http://www.amazon.com/Siren-Call-Hun...=35B3LHQ72IB2Q ). It's the true story of a writer, sceptical of channeled messages, who set out to investigate channelers and spirit guides. He became obsessed with one of the "guides" being channeled... and the story doesn't end well.

    People desperately need something to believe. There are countless entities on the astral plane (and many on the physical plane, as well) who are all too ready to take advantage of that need.

  3. Link to Post #43
    Australia Avalon Member Anchor's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th February 2010
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,653
    Thanks
    11,341
    Thanked 26,310 times in 3,783 posts

    Default Re: Why not one clear channeler? Why 50>100+?

    Quote Posted by Mad Hatter (here)
    I remember reading somewhere (sorry can't recall exactly) that the internal lumps and bumps on each human skull is as unique as a fingerprint. Interestingly enough the resonant frequency of each skull will therefore be unique and that frequency, suprise suprise, falls within the same spectrum utilised by the mobile phone system...

    A search of the net will turn up a diagram of an electronic circuit from I think the late eighties which shows you how to scavenge parts from an old microwave oven amongst other things to build a device that enables you to transmit your own voice straight into the head of an unsuspecting passer by....

    Apply a liberal advance of technology to the above, sprinkle in a few nefarious types and bingo... I'm suprised there are so few people making claims of channeling.
    It would never pass my tin foil hat |-)
    -- Let the truth be known by all, let the whole truth be known by all, let nothing but the truth be known by all --

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Anchor For This Post:

    PurpleLama (13th February 2012)

  5. Link to Post #44
    Canada Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2012
    Age
    57
    Posts
    467
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 1,205 times in 355 posts

    Default Re: Why not one clear channeler? Why 50>100+?

    Quote Posted by gooty64 (here)
    This is a really simple discussion.

    Why are there so many channels and channelers?

    Why not one clear channel?

    ***I have another question/finding!***

    Why are 90% of the messages 1500-2000 words in length?

    Why not a short concise paragraph with something profound and a clear plan for action?

    Why 2000 words, like in the length of a sermon?
    There is an excellent book called 'masquerade of angels' which you can download for free here http://web.archive.org/web/200803240...org/index.html, on Karla Turner's website. Your questions will be answered in detail in this book. I don't look at psychics/mannelers the same since I read that book.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Cilka For This Post:

    ljwheat (13th February 2012)

  7. Link to Post #45
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,394
    Thanks
    36,637
    Thanked 152,626 times in 23,305 posts

    Default Re: Why not one clear channeler? Why 50>100+?

    Quote Posted by Mad Hatter (here)
    I remember reading somewhere (sorry can't recall exactly) that the internal lumps and bumps on each human skull is as unique as a fingerprint. Interestingly enough the resonant frequency of each skull will therefore be unique and that frequency, suprise suprise, falls within the same spectrum utilised by the mobile phone system...
    From http://www.dimensionsguide.com/size-of-a-human-skull/:
    From the forehead to the occiput, the average length of an adult skull is around 21 to 22 centimeters. Meanwhile, the average width is about 17 to 18 centimeters
    From a google search for "speed of light":
    the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s
    From http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...6205716AAy78V0
    The wave equation is:
    Speed = frequency * wavelength, v = fλ
    where:
    v = speed in meters/second (m/s)
    f = frequency in Hertz (Hz)
    λ = (greek lambda) wavelength in meters (m)
    The speed (velocity) of light in a vacuum is usually designated 'c'. So for the particular case of electromagnetic radiation (light, radio, ...) the wave equation becomes c = fλ

    For wave lengths of 0.17 to 0.22 meters (skull dimensions, above, in meters) the frequency of radiation with a "natural resonance" (same range of wavelengths) would be
    f = c/λ =
    (299 792 458 meters/sec) / (0.17 to 0.22 meters) =
    1362692990 to 1763485047 per second (aka hertz)

    or approximately in the range 1.3 to 1.8 GHz (billion hertz, aka GigaHertz)
    Since, contrary to some evidence on many Internet forums, it is not a true vacuum inside a living human skull, actual speeds would be a little slower (lower frequency, longer wavelength), but that is not a major difference.

    From http://www.wirelessadvisor.com, for Dallas, Texas (near my location) wireless providers are operating at frequencies of 0.7, 0.85, 1.7, 1.9 and 2.1 GHz, nicely spanning the 1.3 to 1.8 GHz range above for the resonance frequencies of the interior of the human skull.

    On the other hand, each skull is not a perfect sphere, but rather a lumpy, bumpy, oddly shaped space, so therefore there would not be a single pure tone "resonant frequency of each skull", but rather a lumpy, bumpy, oddly shaped frequency response.

    Some eye candy for the more visual:


    Source: http://www.lightsources.org/images/t...zspectrum2.jpg
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 13th February 2012 at 01:15.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    ljwheat (13th February 2012), PurpleLama (13th February 2012)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts