Barack Obama 2012

[Solstyse]

In the month of February Barak Obama raised 35 million dollars for his campaign.
This is exactly what is wrong with our governmental system.
The majority of the donations aren't listed, or are from anonymous sources.

Now, from personal experience , you don't give someone money without expecting something in return.
We as the American people, have the right to know who is buying our president.

Let's not even get into the fact of how much good that 35 million could do for our country right now.
Ok, actually lets get into it.
Could build 7,000 brand new 1,500 square feet house.
Or fix up 12,000 condemned house ( new electrical work, plumbing, windows, siding ect)
Could buy around 2,700 brand new cars ( reasonably priced new cars, no corvettes or anything)
Or pay for a years worth of groceries for 11,200 people.

Instead it is going to be used to lie the American people.
Besmirch other equally corrupt politicians.


Gas prices are up 6% In February. They are closing down oil refineries in the west coast, cause they aren't making money.
They are already threatening power outages and possible gas shortages as early as June.
The Dollar is in the toilet.
Unemployment Is at a steady 8.3 percent ( I think that number is much lower than reality )

And these guys are raking in money hand over fist.

And that is just one month, by the time all is said and done, he would of raised more then 1 billion dollars for his campaign.

It is hard for a group of people who make around 30k a year to fight against a system that is raising 35 million a month.



I feel better. Thanks for listening

[Cilka]

That does not mean that he will win. Actually, what is so interesting is that no one, not even those who use remote viewing, is able to predict who will win the election. For some reason there is something in the way in seeing the future of this event. It will be interesting to see who will get the chance to mess up this world even more.

[humanalien]

He probably didn't raise it, his banker friends just gave it to him.

[ThePythonicCow]

Some good news - thanks .

[Mulder]

This reminds me of G Bush's "impeachment" by Dennis Kucinich - what a charade. It happened just as bush was leaving office & he actually left before being impeached - but when I do some tiny thing like not pay a fine - within a month I face the music. Shows the law is only to enslave us, while our rulers do as they please. All this is a charade and not much will come from it.

[BlueEyedPersian]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg

http://www.inquisitr.com/206017/pres...-bill-h-r-347/


President Obama signed bill H.R. 347 (also known as the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011) into law on March 9th, amid numerous protests from the Occupy movement, as well as other agencies. HR 347 is a modification from Senate bill S. 1794, which restricted people from entering or blocking public areas that have been closed off by Secret Service while a person under their protection is passing through. The law also included major public events, such as the Inaguration and Presidential campaigns.

The new law, which passed the House with a vote of 399-3, extends the original law by adding more protected areas within Washington D.C, and removing the word “willfully,” from the paragraph stating that protesters can be prosecuted if they enter the area “willfully and knowingly.”

Representative Justin Amash, R-Michigan, explains this change by saying:

“ The bill expands current law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even if the person does not know it’s illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect its illegal.”

Occupy DC protesters are calling the modifications an infringement on their First Amendment rights, because of the areas of D.C. that have been added to the protected areas portion of the act. Approximately 80 protesters organized a silent march to symbolize their Freedom of Speech being taken away–some even taped their mouths closed to visually show their feelings about the bill. The part of the Bill of Rights they are referring to is the following:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Michael Mahaffey, Representative Tom Rooney’s (R-Fla. and the man responsible for introducing the bill to the House) communication director dismissed concerns that the bill violates civil liberties by saying, that the protests against H.R. 347 are, “a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing. This (HR 347) doesn’t affect anyone’s right to protest anywhere at any time. Ever. ” He went on to say that, “… right now it’s not a federal violation to jump the fence and run across the White House lawn, this bill makes it a federal violation.”

[Realeyes]

Gosh, Obama has certainly been busy playing 'god' over others! It is a modern day 'Animal Farm' scenario.

God help America and its people.

Thanks for posting BlueEyedPersian

[Solstyse]

I think it is time to start putting my efforts into researching how to successfully get out of this country as soon as possible.
Any Canadians need an ugly inside and out, pigheaded American husband?
I work hard and can pick up really heavy things.
Just another step towards , when SHTF, we are all going to jail.

[sigma6]

Thought this might help people see why the Obama B.C. issue is a bit of a canard, and why they don't bring it into court. Not because it is illegal (or should I say unlawful?) but because it would expose the underlying dynamics of how they are really operating... - ie. I believe he would be found 'not guilty' (as opposed to 'innocent', there's a difference btw...)

In any event, why would this be? Because it is perfectly legal for someone not born in the U.S to be the 'President' of a U.S. corporation. But, if he was found to be 'not guilty' - that would be letting the cat out of the bag, it would expose the whole commercial statutory system (based on benefits and privileges which can be taken away, ie you are much like an employee working for an employer!) in stark contrast to the common law constitutional system... (where you have inalienable rights)... so they (the government) know they are in no danger 'legally' but they also don't want to expose their game, nor educate the public either...

And in case you are wondering... most of us (like 99%) are caught up in the 'commercial' statutory world' (we gave up our rights, by improperly 'signing' a bunch of 'contracts' like SIN/ Health cards, Driver's License, etc.... note: try signing with "all rights reserved, for:[autograph]" and watch the government flip out!) combined with no one having a proper education of what their real rights are (maxim of law: He who sleeps on his rights, has none, period) and think about it, they even warned us... I remember someone telling my me their lawyer told them "never sign anything!..." (and yes he did mean that literally... and again, what that all entails is another story...)

Anyhow, if you see the implications of what is being said here, this should totally blow you out of the water... especially if this is the first time you have been exposed to this type of information...

... it means (for one thing) that the idea of having a separate commercial entity operating concurrently with the constitution, (one thing superimposed over another) was always in the cards, (and even possibly necessary for the government to operate commercially) but somehow these legal 'pirates' have managed to shanghai the 'ship' and drag everyone living on the 'land' into their world of admiralty jurisdiction (the law of the sea, commerce) and thus try and get us to 'forgo' our inalienable rights for a pittance (commercially administered benefits) statutory laws were originally meant to protect free men and women from 'government employees' (...think of the SSN as an 'employee' number...a legal entity in commerce... oops!)

... A lot of people interpret this to mean we have no rights and we are all 'caught' in a trap... well yes and no, not necessarily, for if one were truly educated in their constitutional rights, and understood everything about contracts, and finally the (private/public) trust law system that is overarching all of this, (you'd be a lawyer! - lol) then we could become the master's that we are, and put the servants (government servants ) to task... and one would be able to differentiate between a 'statute' and a 'law' and that too is another story... ...this is the very 'matrix' and 'rabbit hole' 'the' movie alludes to... it goes back generations... (and perhaps centuries and millenia as per Ring of Power/ Empire Of The City - World Superstate) ...and explains a lot ie. US/British military relationship, why Britain started lending money to US immediately after the 'Revolution', etc.

Winston Shrout - History of origin of US presidency and how it sheds light on Obama's 'game' regarding the B.C. issue

http://www.4shared.com/folder/QjKmdu...stitution.html

[Arrowwind]

I never gave the Obama birth certificate thing much creedence until recently..
now I believe it to be a complete fraud.

since they list him as being born in a hospital in Hawaii that did not exist at the time in a name of a hospital that now exists, the result of a merger of a hospital an a clinic that did exist at the time of his birth, both with different names.... so why is not the real name of the real place on that paper? and then they list his father being from a country that did not exist at the time , Kenya was not called Kenya till some years after 1961.

some pretty serious screw ups for a forgery. What idiot could have done such a poor job at it anyway?

[Paranormal]

I've been following this and I'm listening to Sean Morton's radio show now & he's talking about it. I found out Obama's certificate has a "wrong" number. His number was EARLIER than other certificates in Hawaii for babies born after him (ie, his number should be greater than birth certificates of babies younger than him!)

[Operator]

Posted by Arrowwind (here)
some pretty serious screw ups for a forgery. What idiot could have done such a poor job at it anyway?

If you ask me they deliberately want people to find it ... (perhaps the masses are so much asleep they can't get them to wake up).
There are so many breadcrumbs in the trail, somebody wants you to find the way home.

One plausible explanation I heard recently is that they want a solid lead up to changing the constitution and while at it change a whole lot more.
So make a lot of stuff legal as we go ...

Although I have a feeling they don't bother at all about constitution anymore looking at the signing of the recent executive order

[sigma6]

Posted by Paranormal (here)
I've been following this and I'm listening to Sean Morton's radio show now & he's talking about it. I found out Obama's certificate has a "wrong" number. His number was EARLIER than other certificates in Hawaii for babies born after him (ie, his number should be greater than birth certificates of babies younger than him!)

I was watching 'JOHN CARTER' the movie, and funny, the scene where he is reading the 'telegram' near the beginning of the movie. The first thing that shouted at me was 'computer printout!!' It's like the continuity people were so young they probably didn't know what an old typewriter type font and kern would have looked like (LOL) - that was sad, considering the budget. oh well... To the best of my understanding the Birth Certificate (BC) is a 'derivative' or 'extraction' of the 'Statement of Live Birth' (SOLB) document, all of which, are forms of 'legal property' and 'trust instruments', the extracted BC in particular was created and is owned by the Government with an entirely different trust relationship then the document it was derived from (SOLB), it's not yours, you only have beneficial 'use' of it in a subtle and hidden trust relationship... and in the strictest legal sense it is not even considered a form of identity (this we have solid) BUT is used as a foundation document to CREATE 'identity'... which legally means you have attached yourself to a corporate 'person' as a trustee w/ liability and surety for every legal account created from it. And yet at the end of the day, since it is their 'property' they can do whatever they want with it.

[East Sun]

Bill HR 3200 Sec. 2521 P. 1001

RFTID--Radio Tracking Identification Device.
The plan to micro chip everyone in the US is underway.

I know this has been discussed before but how many know that it is already the law and we have until March 23 2013 to stop it.

This device would have all information about you and more than you would want as in control and manipulation of your self and every other person.
What is the root cause of these things? We need to put on our thinking caps. Who are they who are in control? There are many theories with a certain amount of truth in all, I would expect.
I keep wondering about the time we are in as it meshes with so many things including as far out things as (pun) ETs.

I feel like we are trying to keep back the ocean and have no walls built.
I'm thinking of our children's children as I'm at that age. I'd like to be here long enough to see what happens. I plan to be.

[risveglio]

HR 3200 was not passed. HR 3590 was the Healthcare bill. We don't have to worry about being chipped by the government. Just have to worry about everything else they are doing.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp

[East Sun]

Oops! Did I jump the gun here? I got my info. from a reliable friend and checked it out on (Yeah, I know) U Tube.

But I still think micro chipping is a real threat and something we should keep up on. It is part of a plan for the not too distant future, I believe.

Was that false alarm an anti Obama technique?

I'm becoming aware of a 'trend' in putting laws through. First they state something they intend to do, then people object so they withdraw their intention. Then later it is pushed through without a problem.
This is confusing.

[jackovesk]

What is the ultimate US destination for Obama's "this is what change looks like"? An ex KGB agent discusses what Communist plans for the US are going to be. What do you think of this?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3V...layer_embedded

[truth4me]

Great video jackovesk!----- yes, all that's in that video is right up our alley.....

[galilava]

Thank you - the thanks button being not enough!
Indeed I have the feeling for some time now that America is heading towards the same place where we are trying to come back from... (I am from the former Eastern Block)

[M6*]

Hi East Sun!

It IS confusing, but I think you are serving your country well when you are vigilant.
Keep up the good work! M6*