David Wilcock "DIVINE INTERVENTION: Section I -- Defeating Financial Tyranny"

[Mozart]

There are three systems of law.

1) Ecclesiastical

2) Common Law / Constitutional Law

3) Admiralty "law"

These systems of law actually date back to the oldest systems of law, the Sumerian systems of law that pretty much is the birth of the "modern" history of man as we know it.

But, for the sake of simplicity, I'll work with the post-AD systems of law that are currently in effect.


Ecclesiastical Law

The first one, the Ecclesiastical one, currently exists mainly within the framework of religion and religious entities today; however, this system of law was dominant during the church era in the Dark Ages where the Catholic Church was pretty much it in terms of law, education, power and wealth.

The Catholic Church still exists today as the first and still operating Corporation Sole that operates within the Ecclesiastical system of laws.

Back in the Dark Ages, the Catholic Church was it in terms of reading/writing -- the Bible, etc -- of education and of anything pertaining to the realm of governance.


Common Law and Constitutional Law

Things changed for the better, big-time, when, in the awesome Magna Carta, the idea of the Common Law was formalized and publicly born with the the public mind that one who lives on the land can be free from the tyranny of others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta

So, when the Magna Carta happened, a whole host of awesome writers/thinkers got busy and they wrote a ton of books, pamphlets that supported the idea and cause of freedom that culminated in the birth of the Declaration of Independence and the Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully Amended.

Here's a great site to take a look into those older works on liberty/freedom:

http://constitution.org/cs_basic.htm


Martitime/Admiralty system -- Color-Of-Law system

Now, the Organic Constitution is fatally flawed and it was through those fatal flaws that allowed the third system of "law" to develop and take over the United States with the end-result of the EFF'd-up world that we are in today.

The basis of the Maritime/Admiralty system of "laws" -- such "laws" are really administrative rules and regulations, hence I always put quote marks around "law" when I talk about the eff'n Martitime/Admiralty system of "laws" -- is the idea of Prima Facie as being the underlying foundation of this system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_facie

It was useful for governing ships at sea, but it was bastardized into applying it upon the land, especially the land of the newly-free and sovereign Citizens of the brand-new Republic that was born as soon as the Declaration of Independence was signed.

Europe operated fully within the Maritime/Admiralty system of "laws", due to the sheer amount of commerce that utilized ships as the main conveyance of commerce and conquest.

So when this young, brash and bold whippersnapper, the Thirteen Colonies, had the audacity of hope and change to boldly declare themselves free and sovereign, the Illoonynaughties in Europe were pretty keen to infiltrate and eff-up the new colonies whenever and however they could.

So it was absolutely critical for the European Illoonynaughties to STOP the ratification process of ratifying the Original 13th Amendment, so they were able to do so when they intercepted -- by the freshly-arrived British Red Coats -- the very last ratification document while it was en-route to the designation to make it official.

Stopping the Original 13th Amendment was THE KEY reason for the War of 1812. Don't believe those damn history books that tell you otherwise. They not only succeed in stopping the ratification of the Original 13th Amendment, they also burned down the Library of Congress that contained MANY critical documents that supported the new Republic.

Think about the timing of the British Red Coats arriving by ship at sea for a couple, three months, then snagging the LAST Article of Ratification right when it was en-route on a horse to the designation? I mean, man, talk about eff'n rotten luck! Damn!

With the Original 13th Amendment out of the way, the European Illoonynaughties were able to flood the new Republic after 1812 with a HUGE flood of an virtual army of men bearing those dreaded Titles of Nobility -- Attorneys -- to wreak havoc on the new Republic and kill it by implementing many bleeding cuts via legal means, here and there, everywhere in the several States, to the point of creating/fomenting a Civil War that was designed to be the final kill shot to kill the Republic.

And kill it, it did.

So the Constitution was born that included fatal flaws that could later on be exploited and used to create a system of "laws" that had the same name (i.e., "United States"), the same appearance (i.e. Constitution of the United States), but with a DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT effect of domination and subjugation of a people who had gradually been tricked into becoming mere corporate legal-fiction persons via the signing of numerous contracts that voided out their sovereignty, one-by-one.

But despite the fatal flaws in our Constitution, it's what we've got, so we need to work with it and use it to our advantage to throw off the color-of-law bastards.

Now, look at the difference between the Organic Constitution for the United States of America:

http://constitution.org/constit_.htm

And take a look at the corporate constitution that's the Constitution of the United States:

http://constitution.org/usconsti.htm#preamble

Look at the underlined "for" and "of" ... BIG DIFFERENCES THERE. The first one was created for the several States of the newly-formed Union of States; the second one was created by the USA, Inc, so they owned it, lock, stock and barrel.

Go to Article IV, Section 2 and see the difference of the capitalization of the key word, "Citizen" in the Original Constitution vs. the non-capitalized "citizen" in the corporate version.

BIG DIFFERENCE THERE!

And that's just one of many differences between the two versions. The Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully Amended, is the legit version; the corporate version is not the legit version and none of those changes were properly ratified by the People themselves through proper ratification processes.

The Citizen -- with the capitalized "C" -- is one of the Whole Number of We the People, each of whom is sovereign and whom is superior in terms of standing and power with respect to their own government.

The corporate citizen -- without the lower-case "c" -- is a legal-fiction, corporate entity that is subject to the jurisdiction of the corporate United States via the unlawful 14th Amendment, hence that's why I always use the phrase, "as Lawfully amended" after "Organic Constitution".

The 14th Amendment was not properly, Lawfully ratified, so it is null and not in effect. The corporate 13th Amendment is also null and not in effect.

In other forums I had posted many times an impossible wish/dream of reverting our government back into the Organic Constitution that was created for the United States of America with the Lawful 13th Amendment in effect.

But over the years, that dream looked more and more impossible ... until this Drake interview came along and I was absolutely floored to see that high-ranking men in the US military, like Drake, also share this impossible dream ... BUT those men are in a position to DO SOMETHING about it.

And it seems that they plan to do it soon.

So our role, as persons who are yearning to breathe free, to once again become one of the Whole Number of the People, is to support Drake and our efforts to reclaim our Republic by shouting your mouse as loud as you can!

Shout your mouse! The USA, Inc is a goddamn elephant that has parked itself into our living rooms, our bedrooms, our closets, our TVs, our schools, our food, etc, etc., so let's kick that EFF'n pink elephant out of our lives for EFF'n good!

[Kimberley]

Thank you again Mozart!

However I do not understand "Shout your mouse!" ??? Never heard that before so thank you ahead of time for the answer.

[Alie]

Posted by Kimberley (here)
Thank you again Mozart!

However I do not understand "Shout your mouse!" ??? Never heard that before so thank you ahead of time for the answer.

I think it means our shouting it out by using our computers????

[xbusymom]

Posted by Kimberley (here)
Thank you again Mozart!

However I do not understand "Shout your mouse!" ??? Never heard that before so thank you ahead of time for the answer.

shout your mouse = post it everywhere... emails, blogs, make flyers, etc...

[YvonneG]

Mozart you truly are brilliant and I so appreciate you bringing forth this understanding.

[Saracatt]

Thank you for the legal explanations. This is all hard for me to sort out.

One thing I don't understand is how can this declaration of sovereignty apply to everyone if just a few people did it. I mean, I'm in Pennsylvania, and I didn't know anything about it. Neither do most Pennsylvanians I suspect. Wouldn't we all, or at least a majority of us have to go through this process for it to apply to the whole state?

[A Simple Human]

Posted by Mozart (here)
alxz ~

I'm the dude who did the editing and coordinating for the transcript that you have referred to that has been produced by the Divine Cosmos Keyboard Commandos.

I have sent the 'script to David and he's working on it right now. It should be posted soonest, in a matter of hours, or tomorrow (Wed, the 4th) at the latest ... that's my best guess.

@ Mozart,

You've provided this thread with some absolutely stellar posts. Thanks for your contributions. The banker resignations chart and explanation is quite intriguing. Nice work!

[crosby]

Posted by Saracatt (here)
Thank you for the legal explanations. This is all hard for me to sort out.

One thing I don't understand is how can this declaration of sovereignty apply to everyone if just a few people did it. I mean, I'm in Pennsylvania, and I didn't know anything about it. Neither do most Pennsylvanians I suspect. Wouldn't we all, or at least a majority of us have to go through this process for it to apply to the whole state?

hi Saracatt, i am from western pa also, i have not seen anything locally about it, but then again, i do not think it will be published in the local papers. you raise a valid point, do we all need to claim sovereignty?

welcome to proj. ava.
warmest regards, corson

[karelia]

Posted by corson (here)
you raise a valid point, do we all need to claim sovereignty?

That would be the ideal situation, if everyone reclaimed their sovereignty. In every country. Not just America.

[YvonneG]

Mozart is starting to post at this thread for those who are asking questions and about the Sovereignty issues. I have been studying this for quite a while and I see that Mozart has the many missing pieces. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...-David-Wilcock

[Avocadess]

I'm not a legal expert, but I have listened to that interview 3 times (yes, all 3 hours) and from what I understand there are a certain number of people needed to declare a state sovereign -- and because it does not take a whole lot of people to do it, that is why just how to do it and make it work was kept from the people (until Drake managed to get those missing pieces with his passion and tenacity). The fact that it does not take a huge number of people does not surprise me, because after all, look how few people it took to totally f**k the Earth and its people...! And remember, this is NOT about "overthrowing the government," but it is about arresting the corrupt oligarchs who have made for themselves positions of great wealth and power. Our government will stay in place, with some temporary people in any necessary spots.

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by karelia (here)

Posted by corson (here)
you raise a valid point, do we all need to claim sovereignty?

That would be the ideal situation, if everyone reclaimed their sovereignty. In every country. Not just America.

If every state does it though does that effectively apply to everyone collectively?

[Avocadess]

First things first, it gives them the ability to arrest these people -- but whether or not some of them could hide out in a state that has not been made sovereign? I doubt that would be a problem, since the Federal Marshals are allowed to cross borders to go after whomever they need to arrest!

[karelia]

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
If every state does it though does that effectively apply to everyone collectively?

I would think that yes, at least to a certain extent.

[foreverfan]

I need a Wicock update.

[Avocadess]

Remember this is NOT overthrowing the government. Yes, things will change in a BIG way -- but the mass arrests are HUGE...and will leave us with many capable people who will no longer be having to work under the threat of their former bosses causing harm to their families, etc. I imagine there are quite a few who fall under this category -- not bad people per se, but who have been doing what they have been doing because of threat of torture and death of themselves and their loved ones.

[Avocadess]

The reason it does not seem absurd to me that people are being told in advance of these arrests is because when the clamp-down comes on the United States if we didn't make it go viral on the Internet what was going on, we could end up with people rioting, etc., assuming that the NWO has taken over and planning to take us all to FEMA camps and so on. Most people are NOT going to believe this story until that window of one day comes out from Drake and/or Wilcock that "it's going to happen in a big way within a day" and we are asked to make it viral. Why in the world would David Wilcock want to make it viral on the Internet that he is a total fool and pawn of the New World Order? Obviously, there is NO reason he would want to do that. And he was selected partly to be a spokesperson to get the information out because he was brave enough to use his real name AND he already is known to have the capability of reaching a LOT of people.

[A Simple Human]

@ Avocadess,

Excellent posts! Thanks for your insight.

Posted by Avocadess (here)
Remember this is NOT overthrowing the government. Yes, things will change in a BIG way -- but the mass arrests are HUGE...and will leave us with many capable people who will no longer be having to work under the threat of their former bosses causing harm to their families, etc. I imagine there are quite a few who fall under this category -- not bad people per se, but who have been doing what they have been doing because of threat of torture and death of themselves and their loved ones.

Correct, it is simply the removal of an illegal one.

Posted by Avocadess (here)
The reason it does not seem absurd to me that people are being told in advance of these arrests is because when the clamp-down comes on the United States if we didn't make it go viral on the Internet what was going on, we could end up with people rioting, etc., assuming that the NWO has taken over and planning to take us all to FEMA camps and so on. Most people are NOT going to believe this story until that window of one day comes out from Drake and/or Wilcock that "it's going to happen in a big way within a day" and we are asked to make it viral. Why in the world would David Wilcock want to make it viral on the Internet that he is a total fool and pawn of the New World Order? Obviously, there is NO reason he would want to do that. And he was selected partly to be a spokesperson to get the information out because he was brave enough to use his real name AND he already is known to have the capability of reaching a LOT of people.

I concur. I believe the message was intended for American citizens (and other interested individuals around the world) to prepare as many people as possible (without using the MSM) for an impending destabilizing event. The intent is to reduce the amount of chaos (rioting, looting, vandalizing, etc...) that will undoubtedly quickly follow such an event. It was also a means to dispel the fear of potentially seeing a military brigade in one's area.

I do accept that this type of event has been conceived of and developed over the past several decades. The only portion of "Drakes" report that I question is the time frame. Every time a prediction is made in the alternative community, it never seems to materialize; however, in this case, I do believe we will see some form of positive (on behalf of the people) military action before the end of the year.

[scotusa]

Mozart, don't forget Civil Law based on Napoleonic law from France. France (possessions?) and Quebec Canada use this as opposed to Common Law based on English common law.

[YvonneG]

I have reasons to really think it is truly going to be soon. Some of you will remember that Ben said the Pope was going to resign and also that the Dollar was not be accepted overseas. I don't know if this would hold up in a court of law , but I have a friend of mine who has family in Italy and also friends in the alphabet agencies. For months he has told me that those friends were confirming the arrests. Today he told me several things:

1. The friends in the agencies have told him they can not talk about anything now.
2. His brother-in-law traveled to Italy a few weeks and the "rumor" of the Pope resigning is spreading Italy
3. Before going to Italy, he went to the bank to get some $100 bills, the bank told him that they had to give
him certain series because anything after 2008 is no longer be accepted.

have a good evening my Fellow Freedom "Mouse Shouting" friends