Posted by gripreaper
(here)
Administratve or Judicial:
The administrative procedures act was put in place to address grievances in commerce prior to any judicial process. Everything is commercial between creditors and debtors and the execution or breach of contracts. Contract law is very specific in its requirements, which are 4 in number, the meeting of the minds, full disclosure, an exchange of consideration by both parties and BOTH wet ink signatures on the contract. If there is a breach, then the aggrieved party must submit an administrative QWR (Qualified Written Request) outlining the breach, requesting ”proof of claim” as well as other relevant disclosures of the breach. All collection activities are supposed to “cease” until the controversy has been resolved. If the Administrative procedure fails to resolve the controversy, then the aggrieved party can move on to the judicial process. The judicial process has its own set of rules irrespective of the administrative, and they are not one in the same.
Sovereign or Slave:
Sovereignty has been suspended since the 1600’s with the formation of the Ecclesiastical trusts and the hypothication and surety granted to the Vatican via the Cestui Que Vie Trusts. Although there have been many attempts over the centuries to extricate from this ownership, all the nation states are actually “agents” of this original trust and are subject to it. The articles of Confederation here in the United States was originally drafted to extricate from these Trusts and was drafted and given to our founding fathers from the indigenous Indians, yet by the time the Constitution was drafted, it was already changed and subjected to the original agency of Britain and the Vatican.
Legal or Lawful:
Ownership is held in trust and those who hold lawful title are said to be the owners, yet these owners are not flesh and blood individuals but are corporate entities operating for the benefit of the “beneficiaries” of the trust, and are administered by the trustee. You can legally “posses” a certain asset as long as you follow the guidelines and the mandates of the trust which holds lawful title. For example, when you pay off your mortgage you get a “certificate” of ownership but you DO NOT get a fee simple lawful title. You can "legally" possess it , but WE do not own anything. Ownership by individual flesh and blood humans is a fallacy and does not exist.
Debtor or Creditor:
The context through which we must view commerce, and EVERYTHING is commerce, is who the creditor is and who the debtor is. All courts are basically debt collectors and all adjudication is designed to address grievances between debtors and creditors. Currently, the global system, which has been in place since AT LEAST 2000 years ago in Rome, places the ancient elite bloodline as the creditor and ALL OF the rest of us are debtors. We have acquiesced to this by agreement, through adhesion contracts such as registering our birth certificates and giving ourselves to the corporate trust as surety to operate in commerce. We have our social security which gives us certain benefits and privileges to being an indentured slave to the master trust owners of planet earth, as well as other adhesion contracts too numerous to mention. All Admiralty, Common Law, Equity, Statutes and Regulations are all derivatives of the original “weights and measures” LAWS which have been developed and put in place over the last 5000 years.
Context and Paradigm:
The context, from which the current adjudication is being proposed, is through the “rule of law” and the law of contracts, as well as the administrative and judicial procedures for adjudicating such grievances. If this is how the new paradigm is to be ushered in, then certain protocol must be followed. Notices are administrative and are not part of the judicial process. Liens must be filed with certain processes and procedures followed, and must be prefaced by a “notice of intent” which must also be filed within certain protocols and timelines. Affidavits also require very specific guidelines and are part of the judicial process, and must be notarized to make them official judicial documents which can be submitted as evidence in a judicial proceeding. Interrogatories, such as request for admissions, are judicial and can only be submitted after a case has been filed and the jurisdictional venue and subject matter has been agreed upon, by both parties.
To view a new paradigm by attempting to adjudicate through the rule of law and doing a “reset” back to such a time when mankind was sovereign and free on the land does not exist. To say that the organic constitution of the united states, or any other nation state, holds sovereign immunity is also fallacious, as we are subject to the war powers act, the military districts set up under the trading with the enemy act, and we are operating under a state of emergency by executive order from the corporation which is bankrupt and in receivership to the Vatican and it’s agents.
Conclusions:
From the article:
The next major milestone for Mass Arrests of the cabal has now arrived. Liens have now been filed against all twelve Federal Reserve banks. A Cease and Desist Order has also been filed — to prevent the world’s wealth from continuing to be stolen.
The documents presented as evidence in this latest article are all wrong. Yes, you can notice your assumed creditors administratively to “cease and desist” but that does not mean that they will. You cannot file a lien against the opposing party until you have a judgment from a court of proper jurisdiction. Your affidavits must follow guidelines and must be sworn and notarized and submitted into a judicial process. The affidavit submitted by this article is terrible and does not follow proper protocol. The interrogatories allegedly submitted are totally wrong and are not judicial.
It would have made more sense to give us the court case numbers and let us do our own due diligence as to the judicial process which is ongoing at the world court, or the court of international jurisdiction. As far as I know, there is no judicial process submitted aside from the Keenan case in New York, which IS NOT the jurisdiction for international grievances. To say that the ‘Hague IS the proper venue” is also suspect, for do not the cabal also control The Hague? The rule of law has been set up over millennium to serve as a protocol for all resources to flow to the top of the power pyramid and to assure that anyone who chooses to circumvent this process is mitigated and cast aside as NOT having access to the original Cesui Que Vie trust or the assets of the planet.
So, to mix commerce and the rule of law with sovereignty, and the original rights of the sovereign, with access to the resources of planet earth, is mixing two processes, the public side and the private side. That is like trying to mix oil and water together. It will not work. So, if Drake and his ilk are sending “Notices” and “Declarations” of sovereignty to The Hague, as a private process, and are submitting documents into a public venue for adjudication, how is this possible? If you are standing outside of commerce as a sovereign and attempting to adjudicate a grievance within a public venue, you are entering into the jurisdiction on the public side. You CANNOT have it both ways. Either you operate in commerce and follow the rule of law laid down over the last 5000 years, or you step outside of commerce and stand sovereign, self determined and self responsible.
The contractual agreements made between the Federal Reserve, The IMF, and those who entrusted the resources of this planet to them, to supposedly be used for “humanitarian” endeavors, who now allegedly want those assets back because the global banksters “breached” their agreement, need to move into a judicial process, and remain cognizant of their own culpability in the agreement.
It is my understanding that the shadow economy and the shadow black projects and the black screens were put in place as a global initiative to siphon off the resources and production of the open economy to deal with international issues facing mankind in reference to the supposed “threat” posed by the entrance of ET’s back in 1930’s when the global scientists screwed up the space time continuum at Montauk, and blew a hole in the protective shield around this planet and space ships began to re-enter our 3D dimension. This was such a gargantuan effort and it was determined at the time that it would be best to keep this “other set of books” out of the public domain because mankind was not ready for such a disclosure, and would require an economy at least 100 times that of the open economy. This was set up and discussed at the first Bilderberg meeting and all of the G-20 nations were a part of it.
To expose the shadow side and to bring all things into the light of day would require full disclosure as to the participation of ALL of the nations and leaders, and ALL nations would be culpable and party to it. To say that there is this evil cabal who is fostering an agenda of eugenics and NWO control, while there is a contingent of benevolent ancient dynastic monarchies in opposition which have been heart centered, enlightened, does not look at the biggest picture on the canvas.
Yes, I do believe that the resources of planet earth have been absconded for specific reasons, and that a new paradigm of sovereignty needs to emerge, but I do not think we can place two factions in opposition to each other, adjudicate justice, mete out sentences in a world court, and reset a paradigm of weights and measures based on the rule of law put in place over the last 5000 years, and index this "weights and measures" system to earth based commodities.
A new paradigm would require many self realized and self determined individuals to awaken and demand the release of the stellar technologies which have been hidden, and virtually eliminate commerce and the "weights and measures” system of this planets resources, and the accounting of who owns what and how that is to be distributed based on what? Meritocracy? An amoral code of ethics? Should we re-establish a new power pyramid with new benevolent enlightened beings at the top running things? Who decides who these most awakened and wisdom filled souls are? Do you see the problem here?
The system of weights and measures was put in place to mete out these resources in exchange for YOUR life force energy. This life force energy moves up through the power pyramid and is vampired and consumed by a nefarious small group of psychopathic aliens at the top. To try to apply empathic solutions to psychopathic’s makes no sense to me. To release free energy, the energy which is totally abundant in the matrix, or the source field, or the grand Sophia as it is called, eliminates the need for the “weights and measures” system of law and opens us up to the possibility of a new paradigm.
What I’m seeing so far from all of this “2012 reset” is contextualized within the existing paradigm and is following the rules of a paradigm of law which is dysfunctional and needs to be completely dismantled. What Drake and Wilcock are putting forth is not enough to base any such new paradigm upon. So far there is not enough information, and no one can be arrested without “charges” being filed judicially, and evidence submitted. Do we want to go down that road of adjudicating within the old system or do we want to create a new paradigm?
Until the discourse moves more toward the spiritual aspect of communicating via claireaudience, and we can see clairevoyantly what truly is, and we become clairesentient, and we let go of the paradigm of “technology” which brought down Atlantis, and embrace the power within, we are heading down the same wrong road. We have this race memory in our DNA and we were ALL there to experience it. Let’s NOT repeat what we created back then on Atlantis, the total deluge and nuclear destruction of our planet. The elementals don't like being manipulated. We are standing on the very same precipice now as we did back then.
Let’s go for the enlightened and awakened paradigm of the internal power, drawn from the source field and emanated outward into our collective dream, and shun and reject the technological paradigm being fed to us in its many mutations. We KNOW in our hearts that this is correct.
Re: MAJOR EVENT: Liens Filed Against All 12 Federal Reserve Banks
Bookmarks