Massive Bank and High Profile Resignations Across the World

[wynderer]

Sabrina, i still do not understand why they are all resigning -- there sure are an amazing number! thank you for all the work you are doing on this thread

i gather from the posts i skimmed thru that both David Wilcock & Benjamin Fulford are saying that those resigning are running scared of the good guys -- i have questions about this -- the ones who have been convicted don't do time -- & they don't lose their money in their hidden bank accounts

also -- who are the good guys? i kind of expect transparency from good guys -- i'm not referring to the courageous people who are suing them -- [tho until there's a lot of resignations in the judicial system, the corporate thieves will not pay much of a price -- their buddies in the courts will make it easy for them] -- maybe i'm not understanding, but it seems that Fulford & Wilcock are talking about good guys who are staying hidden? -- this makes me nervous

hope someone will elucidate this for me-- i'd really like to know why they are really all quitting

[YvonneG]

I love this. A friend sent over and I was thinking of posting it...glad you did!

Thanks!

Posted by Sabrina (here)
http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/
Bix Weir via Kauliapele's blog:

A Note from the Bix Weir… “Turning The Tables on the “Doubters”…PROVE IT!!!”
Posted on April 23, 2012
I now receive email updates from Bix Weir (www.roadtoroota.com), and just received the one I am posting below.

Remember that David Wilcock, in the Drake interview and his transcript of that interview, pointed out how some folks often look at any idea or article or evidence that says, “‘Good’ things really are happening for us… now!!” And then think or say or write, “That MUST be wrong.” No matter what it is, and no matter any evidence to the contrary. A completely negative, dark view like that, in my mind, simply assists the dark (the shadows) in hanging around just a little bit longer. Personally, I have no time for such views, and have no time for such people in my consciousness space.

So looking at what those “negative view of it all” folks often say, I felt this message from the Bix was appropriate to post.

—————————————————————————

Turning The Tables on the “Doubters”…PROVE IT!
by Bix Weir

“May you live in interesting times”…a Chinese curse :-o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_you...eresting_times

This weekend I’ve been knee deep in analyzing all the “Conspiracy Theories” about the Good Guys taking out the Bad Guys and where it’s all going. It was supposed to be in the Friday Road Trip but I have clearly missed my own deadline. Should be out early next week.

But what I am coming across is a plethora of articles lately slamming the Conspiracy Theories and telling people to “give up the ghost” and wake up to the reality that we are 100% screwed no matter what happens. They claim that facing the reality of poverty, death and destruction is the only honest way to see the future and to “grow up and deal with it”.

So here’s what I have to say them…PROVE IT!

Prove that there isn’t a group of Good Guys working to take down the Banking Cabal. Prove that we are not about to return to a Gold Standard. Prove that our future is not full of hope and recovery. Prove the we are wasting our time and energy putting faith in the likes of Drake, Fulford, Wilcock and Roota!

That’s what the world made me do when I first discovered there was a plan to end the reign of the Banking Cabal! I spent the last 10 years PROVING IT and I’ve come up with mountains of evidence and connections:

The Road to Roota Theory
http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/190.cfm

I was attacking the status quo of the Conspiracy Theories and everyone threw the gloves down and said “Before we believe you – you have to prove it.” Those who have followed my work and research have come to the conclusion that I am right….there IS a group of Good Guys that are working to take down the Bad Guys.

So now it’s their turn.

PROVE IT!

Don’t just say that all these people are lying and we shouldn’t believe them. Don’t just say that it’s all misinformation and is harmful to get peoples hopes up.

PROVE IT!
PROVE IT!

What gives them the right to throw a blanket claim over all the Conspiracy Theories that we are about to take the Bad Guys down without any proof that it is NOT happening? The world didn’t let GATA off the hook 13 years ago when they said Gold was being manipulated…they had to prove it. And they did.

So now it’s their turn. Anyone who claims that there is not a plan to take down the Bad Guys…

PROVE IT!

I had to.

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.
Bix Weir
www.roadtoroota.com

[YvonneG]

Very Good indeed Sabrina. I have not bought one pharma product for 15 years or more.

Posted by Sabrina (here)
http://eclinik.wordpress.com/2012/04...april-22-2012/

Cabal Takedown Advisory: Get Everyone Ready!


We were waiting for that “final advisory” from Drake before the final takedown of the Dark Cabal. We feel this could be it. This update came after the reported attempt to plunder Philippine Gold cloaked as military exercise Balikatan 2012 held in Palawan and Fort Magsaysay, Philippines.

Previously, Drake indicated that “scrambling of patriots” are ongoing which means mass arrests are imminent.

At the header of this site is the latest conversation with Drake » http://www.wolfspiritradio.com/main/ [click the play button of the audio player]

Here’s Drake interview last April 22, 2012 at Wolf Spirit Radio » http://k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/416dfn...012_edited.mp3

Here’s the latest Ben Fulford update for 23rd April 2012 » Major confrontations in South China Sea as desperate cabal tries to steal Asian gold deposits

___

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Message from Drake to the Patriots

MESSAGE from Drake: To ALL, I have requested/asked to contact everyone I know, now it is your turn.

Because of the many places that can be hit by the bad guys, I have been asked IF you all would like to help out? IF so, there are several things that are needed.

1- Deploying scouts as best you can. These need to have radio com to someone who is listening. Yes, cell phones are ok, but if a cell tower goes, the phone is worthless…a radio is suggested.

Infrastructure is The target.

-With enough eyes, any funny business can be seen, reported, and the militia can be back up. Unless, it is obvious that those acting funny are a demo team. Then a quick deployment is critical. At the same time as you deploy, be sure the local Sheriff/law enforcement is notified AND that a group of you are enroute and will meet up with them or effect action.

2- You may be asked to secure certain places, power substations, etc. You will be contacted, most likely by a field officer in this event. A local patrol or other standing military…

3- See if one of you can obtain a military band radio. This will allow you to know what is going on and respond accordingly…

I am hoping that this is a peaceful event, BUT I would expect everyone to be ready in case it is not.

I am posting this to all groups I have contact with.

http://wramsite.com/forum/topics/ins...mments:wizard:
—
One of the significant sources of funds for the Cabal is the healthcare industry which registered a whopping $2.7 trillion in 2011, and are projected to soar to $3.6 trillion in 2016, in the US alone. We believe that this is just a conservative figure.

You can join the fight against the Dark Cabal and accelerate its demise just by boycotting Big Pharma. You can effectively do this by downloading “Towards Healthcare Emancipation“, a fully illustrated do-it-yourself instructional eBook that will help you in implementing all eClinik methods that would negate the use of expensive medicine, avoid radioactive diagnostics and treatments in completely defeating cancer, AIDS and all other parasitic diseases. These methods, when faithfully followed, work 100% all the time. Find out more about this here.

[the_vast_mystery]

Posted by YvonneG (here)
I love this. A friend sent over and I was thinking of posting it...glad you did!

Thanks!

Posted by Sabrina (here)
http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/
Bix Weir via Kauliapele's blog:

*snip*

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.
Bix Weir
www.roadtoroota.com

*sigh* this is not how the burden of proof works in debates. -_-;; It is the responsibility of one making an affirmative claim of truth to prove that they are correct, it is the job of opposition(skeptics) to merely prove what you are saying cannot be true for one or more reasons. The default position is not "if bad conspiracies happen, there must be good conspiracies too, so prove that a good conspiracy doesn't exist!" The default position is that no conspiracies of any kind exist (no affirmative claim of anything is made) and then it is the responsibility of each person advocating FOR a given conspiracy to make their case for why it is true while skeptics only need to point out how what is being said cannot be true. It doesn't often feel terribly fair, but I agree with Sagan that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Short of that we're just relying on hearsay and superstition rather than trying to really get to the bottom of what the actual truth is.

[crosby]

i just found this article. was not sure where to post. but it an arrest, the beginning of the drake and comp., arrests? i do not know. but, it might be, so with that thought, i post it here;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/nation...m_business_pop



"NEW ORLEANS — A BP engineer intentionally deleted more than 300 text messages that said the company’s efforts to control the Gulf of Mexico oil spill were failing, and that the amount of oil leaking was far more than what the company reported, the Justice Department said Tuesday.

In the first criminal charges related to the deadly explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig in April 2010, the Justice Department arrested Kurt Mix and charged him with two counts of obstruction of justice for allegedly destroying evidence sought by federal authorities, officials announced in a statement."

regards, corson

[wynderer]

nobody answered my question -- i read thru the posts following & i still am getting the impression that Drake is saying that the good guys are about to take down the bad guys , who are running scared

so i assume that the good guys are military, w/a lot of hi-tech weaponry? because right now the bad guys have control of a lot of their own very hi-tech weapons -- sad to say, on this current 3D Earth, it seems that the ones w/the biggest & most weapons win

edit: oops! i meant to say Fulford & Wilcock instead of Drake, who is also saying the same thing

Posted by wynderer (here)
Sabrina, i still do not understand why they are all resigning -- there sure are an amazing number! thank you for all the work you are doing on this thread

i gather from the posts i skimmed thru that both David Wilcock & Benjamin Fulford are saying that those resigning are running scared of the good guys -- i have questions about this -- the ones who have been convicted don't do time -- & they don't lose their money in their hidden bank accounts

also -- who are the good guys? i kind of expect transparency from good guys -- i'm not referring to the courageous people who are suing them -- [tho until there's a lot of resignations in the judicial system, the corporate thieves will not pay much of a price -- their buddies in the courts will make it easy for them] -- maybe i'm not understanding, but it seems that Fulford & Wilcock are talking about good guys who are staying hidden? -- this makes me nervous

hope someone will elucidate this for me-- i'd really like to know why they are really all quitting

[modwiz]

Posted by the_vast_mystery (here)

Posted by YvonneG (here)
I love this. A friend sent over and I was thinking of posting it...glad you did!

Thanks!

Posted by Sabrina (here)
http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/
Bix Weir via Kauliapele's blog:

*snip*

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.
Bix Weir
www.roadtoroota.com

*sigh* this is not how the burden of proof works in debates. -_-;; It is the responsibility of one making an affirmative claim of truth to prove that they are correct, it is the job of opposition(skeptics) to merely prove what you are saying cannot be true for one or more reasons. The default position is not "if bad conspiracies happen, there must be good conspiracies too, so prove that a good conspiracy doesn't exist!" The default position is that no conspiracies of any kind exist (no affirmative claim of anything is made) and then it is the responsibility of each person advocating FOR a given conspiracy to make their case for why it is true while skeptics only need to point out how what is being said cannot be true. It doesn't often feel terribly fair, but I agree with Sagan that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Short of that we're just relying on hearsay and superstition rather than trying to really get to the bottom of what the actual truth is.

Sigh. You're a drag. Nobody needs to posit evidence. You can just turn your back and go away. You clearly do not like what you see. Time to change the channel, eh? Nobody is making you read this. Actually, time for me to follow my own counsel and place you on my ignore list since you appear to be agenda driven. Like the Turiya person, the other on my list. Whatever your response to this post, I will not see it.

BTW, Sabrina deserves better than this in her excellent thread.

This is not a debate thread. It is a reporting thread.

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by wynderer (here)
nobody answered my question -- i read thru the posts following & i still am getting the impression that Drake is saying that the good guys are about to take down the bad guys , who are running scared

so i assume that the good guys are military, w/a lot of hi-tech weaponry? because right now the bad guys have control of a lot of their own very hi-tech weapons -- sad to say, on this current 3D Earth, it seems that the ones w/the biggest & most weapons win

edit: oops! i meant to say Fulford & Wilcock instead of Drake, who is also saying the same thing

The good guys also have a HUGE armada of STO oriented ET/EDs, to give you an idea, if you compare all the tech here on the planet including the black and above black tech, to what the STO oriented ET/EDs have, it'd be like a fly (PTW tech) bugging a family at a picnic, sure the PTW have a few maybe reptoids on their side, maybe. But, by sheer numbers etc, and tech etc, The PTW just do not stand a chance against the Good Guys, if the ET/EDs pull off one successful "strike" against one of the hundreds of sites they have planned? It will be all over for the PTW. And, considering their near 80%-90% averages and bleeding into the 100% range. Of success, I think you can do the math. The PTW will be toast if they get to close to the line the ET/EDs draw in the sand.

[wynderer]

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)

Posted by wynderer (here)
nobody answered my question -- i read thru the posts following & i still am getting the impression that Drake is saying that the good guys are about to take down the bad guys , who are running scared

so i assume that the good guys are military, w/a lot of hi-tech weaponry? because right now the bad guys have control of a lot of their own very hi-tech weapons -- sad to say, on this current 3D Earth, it seems that the ones w/the biggest & most weapons win

edit: oops! i meant to say Fulford & Wilcock instead of Drake, who is also saying the same thing

The good guys also have a HUGE armada of STO oriented ET/EDs, to give you an idea, if you compare all the tech here on the planet including the black and above black tech, to what the STO oriented ET/EDs have, it'd be like a fly (PTW tech) bugging a family at a picnic, sure the PTW have a few maybe reptoids on their side, maybe. But, by sheer numbers etc, and tech etc, The PTW just do not stand a chance against the Good Guys, if the ET/EDs pull off one successful "strike" against one of the hundreds of sites they have planned? It will be all over for the PTW. And, considering their near 80%-90% averages and bleeding into the 100% range. Of success, I think you can do the math. The PTW will be toast if they get to close to the line the ET/EDs draw in the sand.

wow! an answer! thank you for your courtesy, DreamsInDigital --

but when & where are the GoodGuy ET/EDs going to draw the line? like, what are they waiting for? the planet's being nuked , & the chemtrails are still going strong

& are the resigning bankers & CEOs running scared of the coming of the GG ET/EDs? -- i have to say this -- is it not possible that the GG ET/EDs are actually just rivals to the Bad Guy ET/ED/Humans? -- & Earth the prize to the winner?

[DreamsInDigital]

but when & where are the GoodGuy ET/EDs going to draw the line? like, what are they waiting for? the planet's being nuked , & the chemtrails are still going strong

They already did, and they're already here. Just not so "visually" if you know what I mean. No, nuking isn't being done...not anymore. I have information on the chemtrails, that situation *IS* being dealt with, but I can't comment as of yet the hows and whys. But, it's a multi-dimensional and very complicated situation, what we see here with the planes is just the manifestation from a higher dimension. There are some out there that are cleaning the skys, even of the ash from all the volcanoes. I'd say it'll all be over soon, but where does that get me when I can't give a specific time frame on this?

& are the resigning bankers & CEOs running scared of the coming of the GG ET/EDs?

I'd say some of it has to do with involvement from the Good ET/EDs and Some obviously from what Drake's camp is doing, this whole big thing though this whole movement is so so much bigger than just Drake, and the GG ET/EDs and The Pentagon and the 90% Of The Military, etc. It's multidimensional, it's global, it's interstellar, it's even intergalactic and interuniversal.

i have to say this -- is it not possible that the GG ET/EDs are actually just rivals to the Bad Guy ET/ED/Humans? -- & Earth the prize to the winner?

Are they rivals? In a sense yes, but the intentions of the GG ET/EDs are so much more different than those of the Bad Guys/Cabal/Regressive Reptoids and Grays. The GG ET/EDs have absolutely (and some will deny this,but it's the truth.) no intention of taking over, invading and ruling this planet after it's liberated, absolutely none what so ever. zero, zilch, goose egg. What has been explained to me, is that their intent is to liberate the planet, bring us "Up to speed" to where we should be/would be had we not been under all these thousands of years of oppression by the "bad guys" and give us the opportunity to live up to our potential as an intergalactic race (think along the lines, somewhere in the region of Star Trek: TNG / DS9 / Voyager for an general idea of where we SHOULD be by now.). That's pretty much it in a nut shell. They've got 20 or so other planets to liberate out from under the Regressive Reptoids/Grays, and when they're done here...those will be their next stops. Earth is very important in many different reasons, and many different ways. Certainly as far as they are concerned , we're not trading one "ruling party" for another here. This is partially why they are doing things the way they are, they don't want to be worshiped or thought of/treated like gods, they don't want to have to be responsible for us and baby sit us. But, they also understand they have a responsibility to help us at least "get up to speed" with medical, education, technology etc, and make sure we are capable of standing on our own two feet before they "move on." To them (and this is not a ego/looking down sort of way) we're a very young and fledgling race, they recognize that we need help and guidance, and that is why they're here, they want to help and mentor us.

My apologies to Sabrina for this off topic post, but did want to answer the questions the best that I could.

[the_vast_mystery]

Posted by wynderer (here)
wow! an answer! thank you for your courtesy, DreamsInDigital --

but when & where are the GoodGuy ET/EDs going to draw the line? like, what are they waiting for? the planet's being nuked , & the chemtrails are still going strong

& are the resigning bankers & CEOs running scared of the coming of the GG ET/EDs? -- i have to say this -- is it not possible that the GG ET/EDs are actually just rivals to the Bad Guy ET/ED/Humans? -- & Earth the prize to the winner?

Direct military Intervention seems to be entirely off-limits except in the case of nukes or any attempt to publicly create a large scale disaster. If you think about it, there are too many people who'd consider it an Invasion immediately so I think that's why the ET/EDs have held off on anything like that. We'd misunderstand and then it'd mess up our ability to establish good Diplomatic relations if we had everyone and his cousin firing their rifles at ships passing by. Most of the material I've read from various sources all suggests the same trend.

As to your second question this is actually something that's a real mind-bender to consider but it needs to be considered. Everyone has their own Agenda, you, me, the mods, the website owners. That alone is not necessarily a bad thing either an Agenda just means everyone has something they want to see happen or not happen. The real question is whether their agenda aligns with our interests both on an individual and species-wide level. Currently I think that's very much the case because we've just gotten ourselves so collectively stuck in molasses we wouldn't be able to right ourselves without a guiding hand at first. Sometimes people need a hand up to stand on their own. But they may very well have interests that do not entirely align with ours and we'll only know that much later if that's the case.

Having an Agenda only becomes a problem if the agenda works against our interests while appearing to be for them. That's the exact problem with our economy right now, we were sold on a promise that this would work well and be in everyone's interests when the current system of Globalized Corporate Capitalism only favors a handful of wealthy investors compared to the majority of the population. Taking lessons from what we've seen governments do here on earth is a great starting point to consider at least "how" such deceptions could occur. They seem to follow certain patterns, but I haven't really done enough of a detailed Analysis to really be sure of much beyond that.

As far as Earth being the "prize" this is very much already the case, although perhaps not in the negative fashion the statement originally seemed to imply. If you consider the Law of One Materials then it states that 4D/5D beings align along a path of Service to Self or Service to Others. STS beings believe in extreme self-love and they show that through forms of enslavement and STO beings believing in extreme mutual love through public service and devotion to the common good. So far it seems that there are multiple groups or subgroups within the whole 4D/5D paradigm that work together and this is where the Galactic Confederation seems to come from. So there are multiple groups or subgroups within the greater STO/STS orientations from which one might possibly be able to chose depending on where they wanted to go.

The way I look at it, considering how much evidence we already have of how badly dysfunctional and just straight up messed up the whole government/business world is we need some form of intervention just to change anything. Plus after noticing how a lot of the channelers seem to be leading us towards different descriptions of the same eventuality it's very likely we will at some point see some form of direct contact. We need help and they want to offer it, but when they get here some good 'ol Socratic dialog will probably go a long way to figuring out how well their interests align with ours and it'd be up to each of us to chose who to believe and what to do regarding that. In this case we are a "prize" in that each of us is a valuable individual who's got something worthwhile to add no matter who wants us, it's merely our choice at this point in time as to who we want to offer our "Service" to.

I mean this all assumes the validity of the Law of One material but out of everything I've read I can't deny it's personally captivated me. So either way it seems that events are leading each of us towards a decision point. I'm still very curious when and how it's going to play out though.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by wynderer (here)
...

Posted by the_vast_mystery (here)
...

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
...

wynderer, the_vast_mystery, DreamsInDigital, or others ... if you'd like to continue this discussion, could you let me know. I can move a few of your posts above to a separate thread, so we don't continue to interrupt Sabrina's thread with your discussion. Thanks.

[KiwiElf]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by wynderer (here)
...

Posted by the_vast_mystery (here)
...

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
...

wynderer, the_vast_mystery, DreamsInDigital, or others ... if you'd like to continue this discussion, could you let me know. I can move a few of your posts above to a separate thread, so we don't continue to interrupt Sabrina's thread with your discussion. Thanks.

I think that's a great idea Paul, as it is also a valuable discussion of the bigger picture - let's keep this thread "pure" - please delete this post if you do so - Cheers

[Sabrina]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012...am-smith-quits
25 April UK
Jeremy Hunt's special adviser Adam Smith quits
Culture secretary's aide says he acted without authority of his boss in dealings with News Corp's Frédéric Michel

Adam Smith, the special adviser to the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, has resigned, saying he acted without the authority of his boss and that he had allowed the impression to be created of too close a relationship between News Corps and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

His resignation came an hour before Hunt was due to make a statement to MPs on Wednesday.

Emails published at the Leveson inquiry showed that News Corporation's public affairs director, Frédéric Michel, had been given inside information on ministerial thinking over the company's bid for BSkyB, including handing over commercially confidential information and repeatedly suggesting that Hunt wanted the bid to succeed.

In a statement, Smith said: "While it was part of my role to keep News Corporation informed throughout the BSkyB bid process, the content and extent of my contact was done without authorisation from the secretary of state. I do not recognise all of what Fred Michel said, but nonetheless I appreciate that my activities at times went too far and have, taken together, created the perception that News Corporation had too close a relationship with the department, contrary to the clear requirements set out by Jeremy Hunt and the permanent secretary that this needed to be a fair and scrupulous process.

"Whilst I firmly believe that the process was in fact conducted scrupulously fairly, as a result of my activities it is only right for me to step down as special adviser to Jeremy Hunt."

Labour is certain to ask whether Smith was really a lone operator and was, as he claims, acting without Hunt's permission.

It has already been established that Michel, in his emails, repeatedly refers to JH when in fact this was Adam Smith. However, on other occasions in the emails and texts it appears as though Michel's interlocutor is Hunt himself.

Michel also says in his witness statement that when he was speaking to Smith he was sure he was being given an account of the culture secretary's thinking. It is hard to think of a motive for Smith to give Michel an accurate account of Hunt's thinking that on the surface seems to be biased towards News Corp.

Under the ministerial code, the secretary of state is responsible for the actions of his special adviser.

The government offered the Commons statement after Labour requested that Hunt account for revelations at the Leveson inquiry about email exchanges with Rupert Murdoch's company and whether they were at odds with undertakings he gave to parliament.

Hunt had suggested he should be allowed to mount his defence at the Leveson inquiry, and that his hearing should be brought forward. He is not due to give evidence for four weeks, and in the modern political world, it seems implausible that he would be allowed to keep his job for that long without clear evidence that his actions were dramatically misrepresented by the emails released to the inquiry by Michel.

The culture secretary will be hoping he receives strong support from Conservative backbenchers, and has already insisted his contacts with the Murdoch organisation were formal and kept to a minimum. He has also indicated that the culture permanent secretary gave his special adviser permission to keep in touch with News Corp during the BSkyB bid process.

But senior former civil servants have said the permanent secretary would only have allowed formal contacts about process, and would not have granted permission to give insights into Hunt's thinking, or to work together to put forward a case likely to ensure the bid was waved through.

His supporters have insisted that he acted throughout on the advice of independent media regulators. However, Ofcom had recommended the bid should be referred to the Competition Commission. Hunt in discussion with Ofcom rejected that advice and said assurances granted by News Corp, including spinning off Sky News, made it possible for the bid to be waved through.

[Sabrina]

Posted by wynderer (here)
Sabrina, i still do not understand why they are all resigning -- there sure are an amazing number! thank you for all the work you are doing on this thread

i gather from the posts i skimmed thru that both David Wilcock & Benjamin Fulford are saying that those resigning are running scared of the good guys -- i have questions about this -- the ones who have been convicted don't do time -- & they don't lose their money in their hidden bank accounts

also -- who are the good guys? i kind of expect transparency from good guys -- i'm not referring to the courageous people who are suing them -- [tho until there's a lot of resignations in the judicial system, the corporate thieves will not pay much of a price -- their buddies in the courts will make it easy for them] -- maybe i'm not understanding, but it seems that Fulford & Wilcock are talking about good guys who are staying hidden? -- this makes me nervous

hope someone will elucidate this for me-- i'd really like to know why they are really all quitting

Wynderer - there's all sorts of different reasons for the resignations etc. if you look thru' the 36 pages. Some are sudden and unexpected, some are because of the discovery of corruption, some are because of disillusionment with the present system. And there are arrests and prosecutions going on as well. Certainly the numbers seem unprecedented - especially amongst bankers as some of the graphs showed. Nobody has the definitive answer. Nobody can tell you who all the good and bad guys/gels are - you'll have to use your intuition.

My take on it is that there is a shift of consciousness going on and a lot of untruths and corruption are coming to the surface. People are also waking up (not everyone, but a lot). Dark has to go out for more light to come in. There is also no doubt a lot going on behind the scenes. If you take what Drake says, the mechanism to take the US and individual States back to the original constitution thru' logging papers with the World Court in the Hague, means that some of those in power are no longer protected (if I understand him correctly). Certainly, I think some are quitting because they see the writing on the wall and the possibility of a lot of the major corruption being unveiled. Perhaps others are being nudged out. It's unprecedented and it's major - and it feels good to me.

[Sabrina]

http://www.thedailyherald.com/intern...ty-chief-.html
25 April Russia

Vladimir Putin resigns as United Russia party chief

MOSCOW--President-elect Vladimir Putin tried to distance himself from the fraud-tainted ruling United Russia party on Tuesday, announcing he was stepping down as its chairman and calling on it to be more competitive.

Keen to protect his own ratings which are higher than those of a party discredited by accusations of fraud in its parliamentary election victory in December, Putin proposed outgoing President Dmitry Medvedev as its new leader instead.
"In line with political practice here, the president stands above parties," Putin told the leadership of United Russia, describing the head of state as "a consolidating figure for all political forces in the country."

"In this regard, after the inauguration in May I deem it necessary to step down as chairman," Putin said.

The prime minister, who will be sworn in as president on May 7, suggested that a party congress in the second half of May should elect Medvedev as the new chairman. Putin, 59, has also said that Medvedev, a longtime ally who led United Russia's campaign in the December election to the Duma, the lower house of parliament, will become prime minister.

"Since Dmitry Anatolyevich led the party in the State Duma election campaign, and since I will recommend him for the post of prime minister, I believe it is right for him to head the party as well," Putin said. "It is a global practice that the government leans on the support of the parliamentary majority."

The move could be a poisoned chalice for Medvedev, however, whose popularity has dropped since he and Putin announced last September that he would step down as president and make way for Putin's return to the Kremlin. Medvedev is less popular than Putin among party members, many of whom blame him for the relatively poor showing in December's election and view him as too liberal.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

More on Dutch crisis:

Hamburger Abendblatt: The Netherlands threatened by political vacuum
25 April 2012 | 10:31 | FOCUS News Agency
Home / European Union

Amsterdam. The Netherlands is threatened by a political vacuum after its government resigned over a domestic crisis, the German newspaper Hamburger Abendblatt writes.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said on Tuesday that he did not think the parliament would unite around new elections before the summer. According to him the early elections will take place on 12 September. The far-right politician Geert Wilders, whose opposition to austerity measures at the weekend has brought Rutte’s government to an end, has raised the issue of a referendum about Europe and Dutch sovereignty.

Meanwhile, during the extraordinary parliamentary session several opposition parties made it clear that they did not plan to approve the government’s austerity measures worth between EUR 14 and 16 billion.

[GoodETxSG]

Posted by corson (here)
GoodeTXSG, you have opened the door to some more truth. this is a good thing. thank you for sharing what you know. do you have anything else that you could add? dates? did you hear any definitive discussion regarding project bluebeam? i am very interested in the when, where, why and what that is to be expected. thank you so much for telling us some of what you know.
warmest regards, corson

Sorry Corson... I did not answer any of your questions and I pulled the post you commented on. I caught some flak for posting it. I meant no disrespect to you. Thank you...

[Sabrina]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1sr57Ql6o

UK

Suicide riddle of weapons expert who worked with David Kelly: Scientist tells wife he is going for a walk, then takes his life in a field... just like his friend

Body of Dr Richard Holmes discovered in a field four miles from the Porton Down defence establishment

Police said there were no suspicious circumstances in latest case but revealed scientist was 'under a great deal of stress'

He resigned from Porton Down last month, but it is unclear why


A weapons expert who worked with Dr David Kelly at the Government’s secret chemical warfare laboratory has been found dead in an apparent suicide.

In circumstances strongly reminiscent of Dr Kelly’s own mysterious death nine years ago, the body of Dr Richard Holmes was discovered in a field four miles from the Porton Down defence establishment in Wiltshire. It is not yet known how he died.

Mr Holmes, 48, had gone missing two days earlier after telling his wife he was going out for a walk – just as Dr Kelly did before he was found dead at an Oxfordshire beauty spot in July 2003.

Police said there were no suspicious circumstances in the latest case but revealed that Dr Holmes had ‘recently been under a great deal of stress’.

He resigned from Porton Down last month, although the centre yesterday refused to explain why.
Inevitably, the parallels between the two cases will arouse the suspicions of conspiracy theorists.
Despite Lord Hutton’s ruling eight years ago that Dr Kelly committed suicide, many people – among them a group of doctors – believe his inquiry was insufficient and have demanded a full inquest.
Some believe Dr Kelly, who kept an office at Porton Down right up until his death, was murdered. He was outed as being the source of a BBC report that Downing Street ‘sexed up’ evidence of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction to justify going to war.

full story at link

[Sabrina]

Posted via the Facebook Global Resignation page - don't know if anyone knows about this? S.



Concerning the DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY by the United States as to its obligations allegedly owed to the Federal Reserve banks, see:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/insolvency.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/interpleader.htm
...
See More
UNITED STATES' DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY
www.supremelaw.org
The United States ex rel. hereby notoriously interpleads in the above entitled case for the purpose of formally declaring insolvency as to obligations allegedly payable to the Federal Reserve Banks.

[Sabrina]

Top British Financial Regulator To Step Down


Hector Sants, one of Britain’s top financial regulators during the banking crisis of the past five years, has decided to step down as chief executive of the Financial Services Authority, in a move that deals a blow to current arrangements to overhaul the country’s system of financial regulation.

Sants, who had been talked out of quitting two years ago by the U.K. finance minister George Osborne, will leave the organization at the end of June, the FSA said in a statement Friday. News of his departure came as a surprise as he was expected to head a new body overseeing the U.K.’s financial stability and become a deputy governor of the Bank of England when a new regulatory system comes into force next year.

A former Credit Suisse executive, Sants took the helm at the regulator in July 2007, just before the run on the Northern Rock bank, which proved to be the start of Britain’s banking crisis.

The FSA was widely criticized for its failure to spot the stresses in Britain’s banks and the U.K.’s new coalition government decided in June 2010 that it would change Britain’s regulatory framework.

“When I agreed to stay on as CEO in 2010, I committed to stay and deliver an orderly transition to the government’s new regulatory structure,” Sants said. “The project is now firmly on track.”

Sants, aged 56, had been tipped to take the helm of the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), one of two new organizations that will be replacing the FSA. The PRA, which will work under the Bank of England, will be responsible for banking supervision. A new Financial Conduct Authority will also be established to look after markets and consumer protection.

Adair Turner, the FSA’s chairman, said the major reforms made within the organization since the financial crisis began would not have been possible with Sants.

“I am very sorry to see him leave but I understand his decision, now that he has delivered what he set out to achieve,” Turner said.

Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, said he was “very grateful” that Sants had decided to stay on longer than he had initially planned.

In a statement, the Bank of England said it will work with the Treasury to find a replacement for Sants. The appointment will be made by Osborne and the person appointed will take up the position when the PRA comes into existence next year. The head of the PRA will also be one of three deputy governors at the Bank of England.



Associated Press

http://elitedaily.com/elite/2012/top...egulator-step/

25 April