+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 3 10 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 194

Thread: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

  1. Link to Post #41
    United States Avalon Member Siberia9's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th March 2011
    Age
    55
    Posts
    393
    Thanks
    1,661
    Thanked 1,672 times in 351 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Thanks for putting this up Bill.

    It seems no one wants to deal with the reality of whats going on with this, at least the people Ive talked to anyway.

    I said this before but "they" are not going to do anything to stop this. How do I know that? "they" told me in a meeting I had taken with some of the super elites, and I don't mean oil executives or bankers.

    I was also told that if the public starts to panic they plan to freeze all passports. So if you are leaving, do it NOW while you still can. If you are staying thats fine, just make sure that is your mission.

    They also plan on shipping clean water up from the southern hemisphere to those that survive, for a profit of course.

    We would all do well to keep a close eye on reactor four, if it goes really bad then you will know that it is too deadly to stay in the northern hemisphere. The sewer stream media will of course say its just a fire and nothing to worry about. I was told that they may NOT cause a total destruction of number four and its stored rods etc. This is because it would cause such large loss of life and its just a little too much in such a short period of time. Better to drag it out ten years or so, but you cant be sure with these psychopaths.

    Amzer zo has posted the following several times, read it closely, it contains a clue as to why they will do nothing to stop this folks.

    “Depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World….”. Henry Kissinger National Security Memorandum (NSSM 200) early 1970’s

    The US Shadow Govt. had a covert stated goal to depopulate the Earth down to 500 million people from the about 6 billion on it currently. Their planning document to do that formed the basis of the US Army’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Divisions research efforts. I am not alone in saying this.



    In CIA researcher Robert Morrow’s book First Hand Knowledge he says that he was asked by the CIA to find a way to disable or kill all Americans excepts those that were able to get a life-saving drug that the Shadow Government could control. He decided that the best way to do that would be to cause hypothyroidism and control the supply of thyroid replacement medication. In fact, there has been a growing epidemic of hypothyroidism in the US. Some scientists attribute that to the above ground nuclear explosions at the Nevada Test site. It has been estimated that 60,000 new cases of thyroid cancer resulted from those tests. Meanwhile, people’s ability to buy desiccated animal thyroid supplements over the counter has disappeared. While such events could be coincidences, the research that I read led me to conclude that the Shadow Govt. sincerely wanted to have that kind of control over people’s health and lives and were working slowly and steadily towards that goal. When they are vigorously opposed by consumer groups they suffer setbacks in their agenda. Such setbacks have been many. If people only understood how dependent they are on the ignorance and apathy of the public, they would tell all their friends and neighbors and stop the Shadow Government’s control over the population.

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Siberia9 For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), Carmen (3rd May 2012), Cjay (3rd May 2012), Debra (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), Hervé (3rd May 2012), Marie (6th May 2012), mosquito (6th May 2012)

  3. Link to Post #42
    Australia Avalon Member Cjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2011
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,391
    Thanks
    5,142
    Thanked 4,407 times in 1,148 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    The nuclear cat is out of the bag. We can't put it back. It does not mean that we are all going to die.

    Moving to the southern hemisphere might buy you a few years, at best. All of you "northerners" are welcome here (down south) - we have more than enough space - but I don't think that is going to solve anything, except in the short term. We need long-term solutions.

    I suggest the best thing you can do is to arm yourself with knowledge about how you can protect yourself and your family - and then turn that knowledge into a life-long habit, like good nutrition and personal hygiene.

    Again, I point you to this excellent thread: http://projectavalon...How-to-counter-atomic-radiation

    As always, do your own research, then please share any helpful information you find.

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Cjay For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), Carmen (3rd May 2012), CdnSirian (3rd May 2012), Debra (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), learninglight (3rd May 2012), Marie (6th May 2012), meeradas (3rd May 2012), modwiz (3rd May 2012), mosquito (6th May 2012)

  5. Link to Post #43
    Morocco Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    18th January 2011
    Location
    With friends
    Age
    72
    Posts
    5,659
    Thanks
    45,848
    Thanked 45,191 times in 5,447 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Quote Posted by Abhaya (here)
    It just blows my mind that there continues to be no mention of this in the main stream. I mean it's just insane!
    This is real news. They just do fake and infotainment. Local crimes and murders too.

  6. Link to Post #44
    Ilie Pandia
    Guest

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Hello,

    If I recall correctly Jim Humble (the discoverer of MMS), said in his interview with Bill that he has knowledge of a process make the hazardous nuclear materials safe again.

    Perhaps now it's high time for this information to surface. I am pretty sure that technology exists to stop this disaster! Not sure how moving to the southern hemisphere will be safe (not in the long term anyway...)

  7. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Ilie Pandia For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), araucaria (3rd May 2012), CdnSirian (3rd May 2012), Christine (4th May 2012), Cjay (3rd May 2012), Debra (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), meeradas (3rd May 2012), PurpleLama (3rd May 2012), Reirrac (3rd May 2012), sygh (4th May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  8. Link to Post #45
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    827
    Thanks
    8,769
    Thanked 6,655 times in 786 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Thanks Bill for bringing to light once again this tragic situation that most folks want to sweep under the rug, (out of sight out of mind). I felt from the beginning that this will not go away. It is so sad the prospect of a healthy happy future for our children and grand children may be non-existent. Love with all of your might today for we know not what tomorrow brings...

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to benevolentcrow For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), Marie (6th May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  10. Link to Post #46
    Avalon Member sdv's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th March 2012
    Location
    On a farm in the Klein Karoo
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks
    4,687
    Thanked 4,398 times in 981 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Quote This is a link to the latest IAEA ("Atoms for Peace"), Fukushima Daiichi Status Report from 27 April 2012. Interestingly, from a cursory look at this document, there is no clear mention of Unit 4!

    This PDF seems to be more a review and assessment of recent footage and still images provided by TEPCO of the inside of Unit 3 Spent Fuel Pool.

    "The videos and photos don't provide conclusive information on the integrity and stability of fuel assemblies, and racks. Additionally, there is no footage that provides a view of the general pool structure..."

    Read more here:
    http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus...port270412.pdf
    I also went the IAEA website for answers and to see what action is being taken, and found that the IAEA seems to be soley concerned about learning lessons from the past and making nuclear energy safe for the future. I don't think they are part of some evil world-wide conspiracy, and so on, but perhaps a bunch of overpaid buearacrats who would not know how to deal with the present crisis, even if it was technically a part of their job to do so (and no it is not a part of their job to do so).

    Now screaming at me because I am not going into panic, fear mode about the NWO, global elite, plots to destroy humanity is just a waste of energy as it is pointless.

    Would communication with the IAEA wake them up and get them to take responsibility for acknowledging and leading the way in dealing with the crisis? Before I say no, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt and write to them.

    So, in the meanwhile, I suggest those in danger zones listen to the tons of advice given on this forum on what you can practically do to keep yourself safe. Oh, and be grateful that we are not a part of the ignorant masses - we have had the information made available to us and so we can't say we didn't know.
    Sandie
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. (Carl Sagan)

  11. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to sdv For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), CdnSirian (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), Marie (4th May 2012), mosquito (6th May 2012), penn (6th May 2012), Revere (3rd May 2012), sygh (4th May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  12. Link to Post #47
    Avalon Member sdv's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th March 2012
    Location
    On a farm in the Klein Karoo
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks
    4,687
    Thanked 4,398 times in 981 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Information from the Radiation Network...
    Quote Update: 10/30/11, 6:30 P.M. - Radiation Report from Japan

    Some viewers of the Radiation Maps on our Network wonder why radiation levels in Japan seem to be lower than those in the US in some instances. For example, of the stations in Japan reporting in real time as I write this, their average readings are about 14 CPM (Counts per Minute), in contrast to some stations in the US showing levels in the 30's and 40's. Well, the explanation of that difference is simple. First of all, our network is fed by readings in CPM because that is what almost all of the contributing detectors send out of their data ports, and as we have stressed many times, not all detectors are equal in the design and size of the sensor, or GM (Geiger-Mueller) tube that they are built around. It just so happens that most of our Japan stations use "standard tubed" Geiger counters, while many stations in America use the ultra-sensitive pancake-tubed detectors, which have about a 3 to 1 higher count rate than standard tubes. So whenever you see readings in the 30 or 40's, it is usually because the station is running a pancake tubed Geiger counter.

    Unfortunately, that has led to some understandable confusion, but you see, the Radiation Network is an equal opportunity practitioner, i.e. we allow almost any model of radiation detector to contribute to our network - we are non-discriminatory. But because of the differences, we need to do a better job of providing context for the readings. A future version of the underlying software that runs the network will incorporate a technical database of the different models of compatible detectors, and offer an "Equalizer" function for those who want to try to adjust for the different GM tubes in the various Geiger counters.

    But back to Japan. Those average readings of 14 CPM are from sea level stations monitoring indoors, located in the Tokyo/Yokohama metroplex, as well as the Sendai area farther north and closer to Fukushima. So what conclusions are we to draw from those readings? Well, unless one ventures into the evacuation zone around Fukushima, environmental radiation levels elsewhere in Japan are pretty normal to slightly elevated. We have said before that one must be within 20 to 60 miles of a Fukushima like emission to get an elevated detection just "in the air".

    Having said that, many reports come back from Japan about elevated radiation levels from rainfall, along with hot spots of soil contamination. Here is one such study from one of our stations in Yokohama - "These are all averages of 10 minute total Counts Per Minute as measured by the CRM-100 around our apartment."

    Inside 2nd floor on desk (with windows closed) - 10.4 CPM
    Inside 2nd floor on desk (with windows open and a breeze) - 12.9 CPM
    Outside on bench 1.5 feet above ground - 12.9 CPM
    Outside on 2nd floor balcony at floor level by drainage point - 15.2 CPM
    Outside on a pile of leaves (at ground level) and close to drainage - 19.2 CPM

    "In conclusion, radiation tends to be slightly lower inside than outside, and very small hot spots are being created around ditches and other drainage areas. This is also reasonably consistent with other experiments at a nearby park where I saw a radiation drop from 20 to 30 CPM, to less than 10 CPM when I entered a metal tower (without open windows)."

    Thanks to our "Yokohama Rad" station for this report. He added that an increasing number of radiation maps are finally being released, which tend to show radiation apparently scattered by the wind. The data generated by the folks at safecast.org includes a couple of maps that show the radiation they measured as they drove through Fukushima Prefecture. Definitely check out safecast because the number of their data points is quite large.
    Sandie
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. (Carl Sagan)

  13. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to sdv For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), CdnSirian (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), Marie (4th May 2012), Revere (3rd May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  14. Link to Post #48
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,068 times in 15,483 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Quote Posted by Ilie Pandia (here)
    Hello,

    If I recall correctly Jim Humble (the discoverer of MMS), said in his interview with Bill that he has knowledge of a process make the hazardous nuclear materials safe again.

    Perhaps now it's high time for this information to surface. I am pretty sure that technology exists to stop this disaster! Not sure how moving to the southern hemisphere will be safe (not in the long term anyway...)
    Hi Ilie,

    Apparently, it does:

    Quote Posted by Axman (here)
    Rocky
    If you go to Carmody's post and look up yule I think he did three demonstrations for the us gov on how to dispose of spent rods by burning them with brown gas and they shot him down every time unthinkable the something is out there to deal with this stuff and they want the money to bury it. I think the patents are on line also.

    The Axman

  15. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), meeradas (3rd May 2012), penn (3rd May 2012), sygh (4th May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  16. Link to Post #49
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    27th March 2010
    Age
    67
    Posts
    205
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 366 times in 131 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Wilhelm Reich believed that he could neutralize atomic radiation thereby rendering much of the impact of a nuclear bomb of non effect, he coincidentally died just before his release from prison. TPTB had him incarcerated on an obscure labeling law.

  17. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Rozzy For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), sygh (4th May 2012), UnrealDreams (17th May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  18. Link to Post #50
    United States Unsubscribed wynderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th June 2010
    Location
    FingerLakes USA
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,912
    Thanks
    1,822
    Thanked 3,989 times in 1,133 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    they stole all his papers too, while he was unjustly imprisoned

    he had invented a device that blew UFOs out of the sky

    Quote Posted by Rozzy (here)
    Wilhelm Reich believed that he could neutralize atomic radiation thereby rendering much of the impact of a nuclear bomb of non effect, he coincidentally died just before his release from prison. TPTB had him incarcerated on an obscure labeling law.

  19. Link to Post #51
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Posts
    147
    Thanks
    4,433
    Thanked 349 times in 115 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Quote Posted by Ilie Pandia (here)
    Hello,

    If I recall correctly Jim Humble (the discoverer of MMS), said in his interview with Bill that he has knowledge of a process make the hazardous nuclear materials safe again.

    Perhaps now it's high time for this information to surface. I am pretty sure that technology exists to stop this disaster! Not sure how moving to the southern hemisphere will be safe (not in the long term anyway...)
    I remember that too. Something to do with high quality gun powder and burning the waste. He tested the radiation before and after.

    I don't think tptb want any help solving this problem. It is so sad what we are facing.

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to penn For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  21. Link to Post #52
    Guest
    Guest

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    My heart goes out to the people of Japan.
    I live on the West coast and have been closely watching Japan since the "earthquake."
    This just sickens me to think that the technology to neutralize radioactive material is available and has not been implemented.

    Nagasaki, Hiroshima, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, All of the various Atomic bomb testings, Japans Fukashima and all of the Nuclear reactor leaks just in the States recently aren't enough....

    Post Update: Type in Browns Gas in the Avalon search engine or it can also be found on google.
    .
    Here is one of Carmody's threads on brown's gas
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...+gas#post72893
    Post#13.

    Love

    Nora
    Last edited by Guest; 3rd May 2012 at 18:00.

  22. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Guest For This Post:

    Alekahn (3rd May 2012), benevolentcrow (3rd May 2012), Eram (3rd May 2012), Hervé (4th May 2012), Marie (4th May 2012), meeradas (4th May 2012), penn (6th May 2012), wynderer (3rd May 2012)

  23. Link to Post #53
    France Avalon Member
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    5,403
    Thanks
    12,061
    Thanked 31,025 times in 5,009 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    I have a few points to make on this subject.

    I am not sure that NO radiation level is safe for humans is not an overstatement. I was talking last year with a biochemist who quoted extensive scientific literature establishing that safe levels were much higher than those claimed by the environmentalist lobby. These would be pre-Fukushima epidemiology-type studies and more basic molecular biology studies as well. This is serious science, albeit carried out within the mainstream paradigm – in other words, it is reliable as far as it goes.

    During the Winscale accident in the UK in 1957 (now called Sellafield), I was 70 miles downwind. And in 1986 I was at the tail-end of the Chernobyl cloud in western France. I have suffered no adverse effects. Again, there is nothing to be concluded from that.

    As regards migrating south, this reminds me of the situation here in France, where the warm Riviera is full of the rich and comfortably off retirees. In this objectively healthier climate they have plenty of doctors, while further north there is a shortage, especially in rural areas, where the working hours can be really tough. We need more doctors prepared to put their patients first and less doctors seeking to look after themselves.

    Each person will work out for themselves where they need to be at this time, but part of the fearlessness we need to show may involve bravely facing hazardous conditions. After all, the whole planet is a kind of survival exercise at the best of times but especially at this time. There are usually ways and means to cope, e.g. in extreme areas they compensate for the lack of sun by eating fatty fish.

    I really do believe people need to stand firm and see this through from wherever they are. OK, there is plenty of space in Australia to accommodate the population of China, but maybe NZ would be a tight fit for India

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to araucaria For This Post:

    Alekahn (4th May 2012), benevolentcrow (4th May 2012), mosquito (6th May 2012)

  25. Link to Post #54
    England Avalon Member learninglight's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    England
    Age
    66
    Posts
    357
    Thanks
    6,005
    Thanked 1,696 times in 315 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Hi all

    A lot of info here i'm still going through it myself

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=28870

    much love

  26. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to learninglight For This Post:

    778 neighbour of some guy (4th May 2012), Alekahn (4th May 2012), Hervé (4th May 2012), MacStar (4th May 2012), Marie (4th May 2012), sdv (4th May 2012), wynderer (4th May 2012)

  27. Link to Post #55
    United States Avalon Member ceetee9's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th January 2011
    Location
    Plano, Texas
    Age
    74
    Posts
    834
    Thanks
    10,088
    Thanked 3,550 times in 742 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    And here's another study done back in 1975 that everyone should read. It shows us, once again, what extremes "the experts" and "our government" are willing to go to when they want something bad enough. The book is called "We Almost Lost Detroit" by John G. Fuller and published by Reader's Digest Press in 1975. The book is out of print now, but you can download a PDF copy from http://www.wsrl.org/pdfs/detroit.pdf. Used copies can also be obtained on Amazon at http://www.amazon.com/Almost-Lost-De.../dp/0345252667. Some interesting comments are posted there as well--one by a design engineer who was there at Fermi I.

    And here are a couple of quotes from the book--not necessarily the best ones, but I didn't take notes.
    Quote What this book shows is that the estimated consequences of a major accident were so frightening the AEC and nuclear industry did not want them revealed to the public. It was the fear of an adverse public reaction that prompted the AEC to suppress the report, and this is a good example of the attitude that has prevailed in the nuclear power program. The public has been deliberately misled into believing that there are no problems with nuclear power, whereas there are very real problems. In addition to the issue of reactor safety, other problem areas include transportation, fuel processing, waste disposal, nuclear material diversion, and sabotage.
    Quote Worse, the primary accident itself had gone beyond the confident predictions for a "maximum credible accident" of both McCarthy and Hans Bethe. McCarthy had stated flatly that only one subassembly could melt in the Fermi reactor. The instruments already showed that two were affected, and there were probably more. He had also stated that the reactor would shut down automatically in such a situation. It had not; it had required a manual shutdown. Hans Bethe had testified that a core meltdown accident was "incredible and impossible." Both were experts, and both were wrong.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ceetee9 For This Post:

    Alekahn (5th May 2012), sdv (4th May 2012), wynderer (4th May 2012)

  29. Link to Post #56
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    827
    Thanks
    8,769
    Thanked 6,655 times in 786 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    I thought it odd that Gen. Bert Stubblebine said if you love your family move south. We all (or most of us) love our families and if it were just that simple to move south the world would be bottom heavy.

    After viewing the entire video, and giving it thought I came to the conclusion that while this is still a very dire situation the video seemed more like a promotion or production.

    I am sure what the General says is valid. if it did not have the over the top music, pictures, web site and product promotion at the end it would have set better with me.

    Promote and purchase his interest while the chosen few live comfortably in South Africa or South America does not seem a solution (may for those involve in making this video) but not for the hard working of meager means middle class Northerners. IMHO

    With all of the brilliant minds, other worldly and divine intervention. I still have hope...

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to benevolentcrow For This Post:

    Alekahn (5th May 2012), mosquito (6th May 2012)

  31. Link to Post #57
    United States Avalon Member Mystique's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd February 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    161
    Thanks
    1,605
    Thanked 743 times in 140 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    I was tracking the Radiation Network's live feed and on May 3rd at 12:01 the Geiger counter for the Denver/Boulder Colorado area was 627 CPMs - 100 is consider high alert.

    I thought I had screen shot it and sent it to my daughter - who moved from that area last year.

    When I went back later to check on the email, I noticed it was a live feed, not a screen shot, and the monitors were no longer on the map. The monitors for my area, in Northern California (there were two), were also no longer registering on the map. In fact, a number of the Geiger counters that were running on the original map were no longer there.
    "The Light of my Truth is my Sword."

  32. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Mystique For This Post:

    Alekahn (5th May 2012), benevolentcrow (4th May 2012), MacStar (4th May 2012), nearing (4th May 2012), penn (6th May 2012)

  33. Link to Post #58
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    7th August 2011
    Posts
    2,308
    Thanks
    23,260
    Thanked 14,439 times in 1,555 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    One of the more perturbing and perplexing questions surrounding the NWO's destruction of the planet has been "Why would they do this because it affects them too?" One possible answer is that they have the technology to reverse the continual effects of radiation, once their agenda has been carried out. It has been suggested that HAARP could be used for "good" purposes.

    For the past several weeks I have been focusing my attention on the Fukishima area with the question in mind that there be an answer to mitigate and neutralize the radiation itself. I do not think scientifically but when I read the following I could 'see' that this was a real possibility. It would be interesting to hear from those on the forum who do have scientific backgrounds what they think of this.

    Thanks to Dr. Bill Deagle for sending this out:

    "We have the capability of generating scalar radiation...you can compare radiation to what's called ion cyclotron resonance...and if you have the resonant frequency of say a specific ion like calcium, magnesium, sodium, and you set it up to the non-radioactive ion resonance of an element that's in the same periodic table as the radioactive element, it shatters off the radioactive and then increases the rate of decay of that element. In other words, it can actually speeds up the decay so that it can become non-radioactive. In other words, we can take an isotope that might take 200 years to be gone, and you actually can setup a satellite over that area blasting a scalar radiation signal down for the normal non-radioactive isotope so it doesn't affect nature adversely, but if there's a radioactive isotope, it'll increase it's decay, so instead of it's T1 half being, let's say, 40 years or 60 years, it might be 20 days..."
    -- Dr. Bill Deagle

  34. Link to Post #59
    Brazil Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th June 2011
    Location
    Belo Horizonte, Brazil
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,857
    Thanks
    18,436
    Thanked 24,132 times in 3,536 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Hey folks,

    Am I the only one who, despite this situation being very tragic, thinks this is so ironic as well?

    As I´ve commented on another forum, decades after the US dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, Japan is now counter attacking with the same technology, even if it´s unintentionally.

    Things like this make me believe that even entire countries can suffer from karma, or the big guy out there has a very rigid sense of justice mixed with a very dark sense of humor.

    Don´t get me wrong. I don´t think this is funny at all. I just think this is unbelievably ironic.

    Cheers,

    Raf.
    Last edited by RMorgan; 4th May 2012 at 19:30.

  35. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to RMorgan For This Post:

    Alekahn (5th May 2012), Herbert (4th May 2012), mosquito (6th May 2012), sdv (4th May 2012)

  36. Link to Post #60
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,068 times in 15,483 posts

    Default Re: FUKUSHIMA - Gen. Bert Stubblebine's Personal Estimate of the Situation - IMPORTANT

    Following up on my post above about Brown's gas:

    Quote
    Is Browns Gas practical?


    People have developed generators, welding torches, and even car engines. One person drove around in a car for two years now using only water and a couple of batteries.
    • "When we run out of fuel (water), we go into the gas station and grab the hose and fill it up again. No money is ever paid for gasoline! We are now good for another 1,000 miles".
    You can use implosion technology to decay radiation. Yull has a way, using Browns Gas to disintegrate radio active products and decreases their toxic decay "half life" process from millions of years to only seconds!!! - Why are scientists not using these principles to eliminate toxic radiation waist? "I don't know..." says Brown.


    Yull discusses how the energy tycoons are only interested in getting money.


    "Taking care of the world is secondary to them, money is first". The politician turns a blind eye, and continues to bury this poisonous toxic radiation from the nuclear generations plants. A machine that could eliminate radiation waste is only $100,000 (as compared to millions to just seal it and bury it). Where are their minds?
    From: http://nottaughtinschools.com/Yull-B...Interview.html




    10) Directing the flame at Cobalt-60 radiation was reduced by 70% in the sample.
    11) Directing the flame at Americium the radiation was reduced 96%.



    For more information on these test results contact: The Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc.100 Bronson Ave, suite 1001Ottawa, Ontario K1R 6G8Canada(613) 236-6265 fax: (613) 235-5876



    From: http://www.svpvril.com/svpweb9.html
    Last edited by Hervé; 4th May 2012 at 18:52.

  37. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Alekahn (5th May 2012), meeradas (4th May 2012), RMorgan (4th May 2012)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 3 10 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts