Bill Gates

[rgray222]

SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. — Melinda Gates recently announced a “new crusade” for her $32 billion Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. A recent Newsweek interview with Michelle Goldberg says it’s a “decision that is likely to change lives all over the planet.”

Gates has “decided to make family planning her signature issue,” by investing “billions to revolutionize contraception worldwide,” with substantial economic consequences.

The Gates decision will “be hugely significant for American women.” She’s “pouring money into the long-neglected field of contraceptive research, seeking entirely new methods of birth control,” a “whole new class of drugs,” some that could even work without hormones, and others, might be implantable devises that never need to be removed, can even be turned on and off by the woman.

The good news: Gates is already in high gear “teaming up with the British government to co-sponsor a summit of world leaders in July in London, to start raising the $4 billion the foundation says it will cost to get 120 million more women access to contraceptives by 2020.”

And that’s huge: Last year the entire pharmaceutical industry made a total of $67.4 billion in all their research, including cancer and heart, plus the cost of developing a single new drug can exceed $1 billion. So Gates $4 billion in new research for women’s health care makes Melinda Gates perhaps the biggest player in the future of pharmaceuticals worldwide.

Commercial opportunities: Drug sales of $15 billion to $36 billion annually

Moreover, we know investing in R&D can have huge payoffs, creating major new marketing and sales opportunities for the commercial drug world. $4 billion of new research is certain to leverage up several times with new business opportunities not only for the pharmaceutical industry, but for clinics, hospitals and medical professionals.

For example, Newsweek says that Pfizer’s Depo-Provera is already the most “popular in many poor countries because women need to take it only four times a year.” So you do the numbers: If 120 million new women users chose Depo-Provera, at an estimated average cost between $120-$300 per woman annually, that works out to $15 billion to $36 billion in new sales annually, a nice payoff from leveraging $4 billion in research money.

Gates’s research commitment may be one of the most significant health-care decisions of the new century. As Gates put it, when she realized “what needed to get done in family planning, I finally said, OK, I’m the person that’s going to do that.” Now she hopes to lead the charge and “galvanize a global movement.”

With this commitment, if Gates succeeds in these plans the global economic, social, cultural and political landscape will be dramatically altered, with women gaining more power over their own health care.

Economic ripples: 120 million potential new women entrepreneurs

We’ve all heard about how all across the globe, especially in developing, emerging and poor countries, new banking institutions are making microloans (small loans to poor people with no credit or collateral). This new industry stepped into the global spotlight back in 2006 when Muhammud Yunus, an Indian economics professor turned banker, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, along with his Grameen Bank, for their groundbreaking efforts with microloans, creating a new class of micro-entrepreneurs worldwide.

So we expect the Gates $4 billion research investment will add more stimulus to this microloan phenomenon and increase membership in this new class of entrepreneurs.

In a well-documented feature on women’s health, population growth, birth control and family planning back in 2010, the editors of Mother Jones magazine, Monika Bauerlein and Clara Jeffery, wrote:

“Every tiny improvement in the status of women, every bit of education for girls, translates into women having more control over their fertility, which translates into family sizes that match parents’ means and wishes, which in turn means more opportunity for the next generation — a virtuous cycle of enormous potential” and economic prosperity.

[WhiteFeather]

LMFAO. Bill the Bull Shyte Artist.

[tenacity1]

eugenics it doesn't come in a smallpox blankets anymore, it comes smiling at you thru these darn boxes of evil that transmit thoughts. Gates and his ilk are shills for the NWO

[jackovesk]

When the SHTF Bill & Melinda Gates will be on an unexpected Early Retirement...

[GoodETxSG]

Ya know, they are some really weird and evil people... I am ashamed I ever worked at Microsoft... How did he go from being a garage PC geek, to stealing other people’s ideas to being a Luciferian Mass Murdering billion air in such a short period of time? Talk about a transformer, he must have popped out of his momma and had his horns shaved off and his tail nipped ASAP, they just forgot the FANGS!



¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by tenacity1 (here)
eugenics it doesn't come in a smallpox blankets anymore, it comes smiling at you thru these darn boxes of evil that transmit thoughts. Gates and his ilk are shills for the NWO

I do not doubt it, when working there the CIA back doors and oddly placed code depicting the devil was puzzling back then, not so much now...

[Maia Gabrial]

Some people just don't know what to do with all their money.... Some people use it for drugs and eventually kill themselves with it. But the Gateses will use their wealth to kill others.... How UN-NOBLE of them.... Give the Gateses' money to people who WILL solve this nonexistent overpopulation problem without harming a hair on anyone's head. WE can show them how to use the money wisely.... IMO!

[bluestflame]

anticipating an "accidental" side effect of the planned contraception drugs to be either long term sterility or "second generational" sterility , where it skips a generation and our children are unable to have children

that would be the sneaky way to achieve thier agenda

remember bill gates was investing heaps into robotics and nanotechnology

[toad]

I dont get the problem? Whats so wrong with new contraception research?

[Positive Vibe Merchant]

I think the problem that in all likelihood there will be 'side effects' that will cause sterilization, preventing children being born.

it isn't as far fetched as one might seem. Gates has been into Eugenics for some time.

PVM

[Ellisa]

I agree with Toad. What on earth is wrong with extending the use of safe, affordable contraception to the women (and possibly men) of the Third World and elsewhere who are desperate to limit their family size?

[Positive Vibe Merchant]

is not the condom with 99.9% effiecieny, combined with some other form of contraception not good enough?

are we so lazy that we need a pill or a jab that last a year so we can just forget about it?

[Ellisa]

Condoms do not give women the assurance that they need. So the answer to your question is ---Yes- we do need a pill or jab so that the other half of the couple can use your suggested "some other form of contraception" to ensure complete protection from accidental pregnancy, which is something only one half of the participants is going to have to deal with.

[bluestflame]

the gates's have also been advocates of the utilisation of vaccinations to help reduce the population , which adds a different slant to thier interest in contraception marketed cleverly as "empowering women"

[Hervé]

"Empowering" women is the Lizzies' newspeak for total control of the human species

According to Alex Collier, that is the way the Grays had been had: the Lizzies genetically modified the female of their species to the point they couldn't reproduce anymore and from then on were at the mercy of the Lizzies' cloning technology in order to "survive" as a species.

[Debra]

I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.

Just like the financial system - keeps millions in debt.

Get off the platform! It is true what they say about the Mac .. when you get one, you never look back.

*post update*

So, instead of investing even more money into protective measures to curb the rate of child birth, when there are plenty around already, why are they not giving money to protect children already here ??? And in peril !

Seriously, what do Americans really say about this?

[Arrowwind]

Posted by rgray222 (here)
[B]“Every tiny improvement in the status of women, every bit of education for girls, translates into women having more control over their fertility, which translates into family sizes that match parents’ means and wishes, which in turn means more opportunity for the next generation — a virtuous cycle of enormous potential” and economic prosperity.

There's lots I could say about this article but I decided to just attack this one point.
Here in the USA women have had access to fairly reliable birth control for at least 2 generations now.
What I am seeing is that our children, who were more chosen than anytime previously in history,
are not receiving more economic opportunity and clearly studies show that the current youth of today, under 35
should anticipate a quality of life that is much less than their parents.

We worked harder, with two parents working, spent less time together as a family and our children in general are not doing better for our sacrifices.

So I call Bull ****.

[toad]

Posted by Zebra (here)
I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.

Oh come on now, as if Steve Jobs didnt steal ideas? OSX is also prone to virii, and is becoming more and more so, OSX just wasnt nearly popular enough for anyone to really care enough to design malware for it, but that is quickly changing.

[The Truth Is In There]

Posted by Ellisa (here)
Condoms do not give women the assurance that they need. So the answer to your question is ---Yes- we do need a pill or jab so that the other half of the couple can use your suggested "some other form of contraception" to ensure complete protection from accidental pregnancy, which is something only one half of the participants is going to have to deal with.

pregnancy is supposed to happen when people have sex, otherwise mother nature would have made sure it won't. people who develop chemicals for population control, be it vaccines or contraceptives, should be fed their own stuff first, just like any doctor should first test a medicine on him/herself before prescribing it to patients. that would be a beneficial form of depopulation.

for people who need sex but don't want to bother with kids there are various natural means to prevent pregnancy, no one needs chemicals. people are just being told they do and then wonder why they get "unwanted" (from their pov) side-effects.

[Maia Gabrial]

There are so many worthy causes they could be focused on, like cleaning up the air, food and water. Like making life better for ALL people, not just the frigging elites and their chosen butt kissers..... Eugenics is not right. I think that most people don't understand life to begin with, let alone the Divine Plan....

Food is being INTENTIONALLY destroyed for this nonexistent overpopulation problem. Naturally, destroy the food and water, create a "shortage" and people will die. Quite a few people have already been deceived into believing this STAGED problem is the only reason why people have died of starvation....This is PREMEDITATED MURDER in my opinion.

If these two "concerned" really want to help anyone, then they should use their money and influence to prevent the destruction of and the tampering of the food supply. Maybe they could use some of their superior education in finding solutions to housing "problems", too. Instead they want to be the ones to find ways to control the population. Sounds NWO to me....

I don't have much confidence in people like the Gateses....

[Debra]

LOL, you are probably right about Steve Jobbs, toad.
But I speak from experience of the last wonderful 4 years of continuous mac usage - I AM CLEAN. All macs, including my original and my more recent puchases, are purring away. And no protection.
After the nightmares I had with a PC and microsoft prior to turning over, I wonder why I put myself through it all

Posted by toad (here)

Posted by Zebra (here)
I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.

Posted by toad (here)

Oh come on now, as if Steve Jobs didnt steal ideas? OSX is also prone to virii, and is becoming more and more so, OSX just wasnt nearly popular enough for anyone to really care enough to design malware for it, but that is quickly changing.