A documentary more powerful than Loose Change ... blows the lid off the Inside Job!

[Zook]

The latest and most compelling documentary by the Citizen Investigation Team:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

https://youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o&feature=fvw

This documentary leaves no doubt that the September 11, 2001 attacks were a false flag event. If in the past we needed to consider the Pentagon node of the attacks as corroborating evidence to the establishment of Inside Job at the WTC7 node, then we don't need to anymore. With this latest video documentary, we can ascertain beyond any shadow of doubt, beyond any conjectural points, and beyond any corroborative evidence ... incontrovertible proof of the false flag operation at the Pentagon attack node.

So now, we have established Inside Job independently at two nodes of the 9/11 attacks. It's only a matter of time before the remaining two nodes (tentatively established as Inside Jobs) are also brought into full establishment. Kudos to Craig Ranke, Aldo Marquis, and the rest of the team. Unlike Loose Change, which is to be commended for opening our eyes but which suffers from too much unnecessary speculation, this latest documentary removes all speculation from the investigative equation.


Cheers
Uncle Zook

[iceni tribe]

superb documentary, thanks for the link.

one of the most comprehensive pentagon documentary's i have seen ,i liked the cabbie at the end who had the lampost go through his window admit to it being a set up.

time is coming to make arrests for those involved and those still trying to peddle the lie.

[Operator]

Not much responses on this thread ... and yet this documentary is a top class piece of work.

Maybe the beginning is somewhat lengthy on the flight path witnesses ... the real stinger is in the end. But citizens initiatives is what we need !
I hope the makers of this documentary are safe and will stay safe. Let's make sure there will be follow up after follow up ...

[Dale]

This is definitely a top notch documentary. There are a good plenty videos on "9/11 Truth" that are questionable, at best. The Citizen Investigation Team did a thorough job exposing some of the inconsistencies reported about the Pentagon attack.

The idea that Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon, rather than into it, corroborates what I was told concerning the attack.

From what I was given, Flight 77 was supposed to slam into the Pentagon, causing the damage, but during a "last minute" calculation, it was found that the plane couldn't perform the maneuvers required at the speed and altitude needed to cause the damage. It was then decided that Flight 77 would swoop down, around 100 feet above the Pentagon, while a small projectile was fired to cause the explosion. A sleight of hand trick. Everyone would see the huge plane, followed by the explosion, and automatically relate the two. Flight 77 was then to be flown out toward the ocean for disposal; but I, personally, believe it was flown to an airfield of some sorts, amidst all of the chaos.

As for the pilots of the four planes involved that day; it seems plausible that the planes' original pilots were somehow overrode by a remotely operated controlling system.

[jaybee]

Hiya...after reflecting on the whole 9/11 business....this is what I think probably happened...


Al Qaeda terrorists hijacked 4 airliners.

The day was chosen because Vigilant Guardian/Global Guardian military exercises
were taking place...and the confusion would buy the terrorists time.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...ilant_guardian



Flight 11 was crashed by terrorists into the World Trade Centre tower.

Flight 175 was crashed by terrorists into the other WTC tower.


The US military got on top of the situation and....


Flight 77 was taken by remote control over the Atlantic Ocean and shot down.

Flight 93 was taken by remote control to a rural part of Pennsylvania and shot down.


For political and propaganda reasons it was decided to cover up the fact that
the military were forced to shoot down the 2 planes.

The Pentagon is the lynch-pin to the whole thing. The incident that fuels the 'Inside Job'
conspiracy and perhaps was, in retrospect a mistake by the 'authorities'.

It was decided to set up the Pentagon to make it look like flight 77 hit it.
Pentagon chosen because it is government property and there was an unoccupied section?

A helicopter fired a missile into the unoccupied area?
Or bombs were set off to look like the building was hit?

Airliner wreckage was placed at the scene.

As I have said before...I don't think that 9/11 was an 'Inside Job'....but I do think
that covering up what actually happened to flights 77 and 93 has brought about
an internet PSYOPS job....to drive the 9/11 conspiracy and muddy the waters.

??????????

[Operator]

Posted by jaybee (here)
Flight 11 was crashed by terrorists into the World Trade Centre tower.
Flight 175 was crashed by terrorists into the other WTC tower.

The US military got on top of the situation and....

Flight 77 was taken by remote control over the Atlantic Ocean and shot down.
Flight 93 was taken by remote control to a rural part of Pennsylvania and shot down.

There is an inconsistency in your storyline ...
1. if flight 77 and 93 could be taken over by remote control are you then suggesting that this could be done with any plane any time the military wants to ?
2. if so, then why did they let flight 11 and 175 crash into the buildings if they had the opportunity to remotely control the planes ?

I agree that there is probably a part where (part of) the US government and/or world governments were blackmailed to go along with a cover up.
But that's much more complicated then you picture here ....

[Dale]

As I have said before...I don't think that 9/11 was an 'Inside Job'....but I do think
that covering up what actually happened to flights 77 and 93 has brought about
an internet PSYOPS job....to drive the 9/11 conspiracy and muddy the waters.

From my understanding of the event, most people, including the vast majority of government officials, were on the "outside" concerning 9/11. However, that doesn't quite disqualify it as an "inside job." Again, we go back to compartmentalization and black budget projects, as well as "shadowy governmental bodies."

The notion of a "War on Terror" was planted many, many years ago. Dr. Werner von Braun, an insider by all means, suggested that terrorism would be the next "public enemy" following the cold war scare. It was shortly after that time that the "shadowy governmental bodies" began planning how terrorism would enter, stage right, of course.

Originally, the plan for 9/11, and yes, that date was chosen far in advance, involved training rogue, extremists piloting airliners into the twin towers, as well as other notable buildings. As time went on, it was discovered that there was a need for a bit of help. A couple dozen hijackers just couldn't do the "tricks" needed.

[frank samuel]

Just finished watching the documentary report, the part where the cab driver witness thought to be off camera admitted that it was stage and that his wife work for the FBI makes you wonder just how many people where involved in the cover up. For many the whole 911 scenario makes no sense, for others who for some reason or another work with some type of covert operation is not surprisingly at all.

You know that part of recorded history now officially uncover over 100 years later puts over 2,500 people as being involved in the murder of Abraham Lincoln, even in the 1800's they new how to carry out a perfect covert operation.

To be honest I don't like talking much about 911, the reasons is because I was born in NYC and lived there on and off a large portion of my life. Some of my friends worked in the World Trade Center, so I have to swallow hard when stating my views. Amidst the broken heart of so many families who became the victims of this tragedy and the many voices world wide crying out for justice, there's always a positive because it shook us all up from our dreamy state and gave us a rude awakening .

This a very courageous video presenting clear evidence that soon will put those responsible on the hot seat as the lies begin to crumble and backfire. We as a nation can sleep some of the time but not all the time.

Thank you ever so much for posting this documentary.

Many many blessings to all.

[jaybee]

Posted by Operator (here)
There is an inconsistency in your storyline ...
1. if flight 77 and 93 could be taken over by remote control are you then suggesting that this could be done with any plane any time the military wants to ?
2. if so, then why did they let flight 11 and 175 crash into the buildings if they had the opportunity to remotely control the planes ?
....

As I said in my post I think that Vigilant Guardian/Global Guardian probably bought the
terrorists enough time to crash into the twin towers....there must have been a lot
of confusion...with not knowing who was who...with transponders being turned off etc.

[jaybee]

=The_Cipher_Replied;49821..... A couple dozen hijackers just couldn't do the "tricks" needed.

If what I'm saying/speculating is correct...they managed to do enough to crash into the
Twin Towers?

This must have been a huge embarrasment to the US government and military...and
a heartbreaking tragedy for all the people caught up in the events of the day.

[Zook]

Hi jaybee,

Posted by jaybee (here)
Hiya...after reflecting on the whole 9/11 business....this is what I think probably happened...

Al Qaeda terrorists hijacked 4 airliners.

My question to you ... do you believe that Al Qaeda exists in any context other than that of a western military industrial complex front organization? A partial transcript of a Brzezinski interview attesting to the fact of CIA creation of Al Qaeda can be viewed here at:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=7718

The day was chosen because Vigilant Guardian/Global Guardian military exercises
were taking place...and the confusion would buy the terrorists time.
http://www.historycommons.org/entity...ilant_guardian

Who are these terrorists you are alluding to ... Saudis led by Osama bin Laden, the Emmanuel Goldstein of the 21st century? Or elements within the western military industrial complex? If Saudis, what is the likelihood of internal knowledge of such exercises being available to Al Qaeda? To Al Qaeda again during the 7/7 bombings in London when anti-terrorist preparatory exercises were scheduled at the exact locations and at the exact times the bombings took place?
Hmm ... training exercises overlapping attack events. Do you recognize a pattern?

Flight 11 was crashed by terrorists into the World Trade Centre tower.
Flight 175 was crashed by terrorists into the other WTC tower.
The US military got on top of the situation and....

Why do you assume that Al Qaeda crashed those planes? Very little factual evidence supports that claim, including one fatal fact: some of the alleged Saudi hijackers were found to be alive after the day of the attacks.

Flight 77 was taken by remote control over the Atlantic Ocean and shot down.
Flight 93 was taken by remote control to a rural part of Pennsylvania and shot down.
For political and propaganda reasons it was decided to cover up the fact that
the military were forced to shoot down the 2 planes.

Interesting speculation. Speculation without evidence is well ...

The Pentagon is the lynch-pin to the whole thing. The incident that fuels the 'Inside Job'
conspiracy and perhaps was, in retrospect a mistake by the 'authorities'.

A mistake? Why are you so generous to the official account when the account is full of blatant lies?

It was decided to set up the Pentagon to make it look like flight 77 hit it.
Pentagon chosen because it is government property and there was an unoccupied section?

Unoccupied? If I recall correctly some 125 people in the Pentagon lost their lives. Indeed, the section where the impact took place housed the Pentagon`s accounting offices. On September 10, 2001, Rumsfeld reported some 2.3 trillion dollars missing.

A helicopter fired a missile into the unoccupied area?
Or bombs were set off to look like the building was hit?
Airliner wreckage was placed at the scene.

As I have said before...I don't think that 9/11 was an 'Inside Job'....but I do think
that covering up what actually happened to flights 77 and 93 has brought about
an internet PSYOPS job....to drive the 9/11 conspiracy and muddy the waters.
??????????

I respectfully disagree. Virtually all of your speculation fails upon study of the factual evidence.


Cheers
Uncle Zook

[jaybee]

Posted by frank samuel (here)
This a very courageous video presenting clear evidence that soon will put those responsible on the hot seat as the lies begin to crumble and backfire. We as a nation can sleep some of the time but not all the time.
.

If as I speculated flights 77 and 93 were 'brought down' by the military....perhaps the families
involved know what really happened....and maybe, even...understand why and how it
happened that way?

If it is all highly classified then there are going to be many, many people who know what
happened...but can't go public...???

[jaybee]

Posted by zookumar (here)
Hi jaybee,

My question to you ... do you believe that Al Qaeda exists in any context other than that of a western military industrial complex front organization?

I believe that Al Qaeda exists and have used Western Governments for their advancement
and you could say......have used them and their money (when the Russians were involved
with Afganistan) to build the organization.

Who are these terrorists you are alluding to ... Saudis led by Osama bin Laden, the Emmanuel Goldstein of the 21st century? Or elements within the western military industrial complex? If Saudis, what is the likelihood of internal knowledge of such exercises being available to Al Qaeda? To Al Qaeda again during the 7/7 bombings in London when anti-terrorist preparatory exercises were scheduled at the exact locations and at the exact times the bombings took place?
Hmm ... training exercises overlapping attack events. Do you recognize a pattern?

Yes I do..... and I don't think for one minute that 7/7 was an 'inside job'....they are probably
very clever....extremely committed and have infiltrated Western Society at a military level..
or are good at hacking into military sites???

Unoccupied? If I recall correctly some 125 people in the Pentagon lost their lives. Indeed, the section where the impact took place housed the Pentagon`s accounting offices.

I suppose we will never know details of the proposed Pentagon deaths?? It being classified. But IF
innocent people in the Pentagon WERE killed that day....this could be another reason why
the whole thing is kept so secret and a PSYOPS job would be full steam ahead on the internet
to muddy the waters and keep the chaos/mistrust going.....

Cheers
Uncle Zook

You're not my Uncle........

[frank samuel]

As a old war veteran if the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden where the culprits of the 911 tragedy then Afghanistan would have been the only choice, it was clearly not, that for me raise alarm bells that something was terribly wrong. Now following the money trail we know there's a lot more to this story than meets the eye.

This is no longer a secret and no matter how much they try to suppress the truth , is no way to stop it. Can you imagine being the cab driver who knew it was a stage event and having to live with that lie for the rest of your life, it will eat you up alive. Fear of getting kill is no longer a factor as many brave man and women will tell the truth.

That's about all I could say for those that thought that you got away with it this is for you, we got your number and your day is coming sooner or later you will have to face a world court and answer for this terrible injustice you have perpetrated on so many innocent people. I'm way passed the stage of anger, is time to bring the troops home and end this charade, these kids will never be the same after finding out the truth.

The real terrorist are us the military and the government as we kill so many innocent people , I renounce my military retirement pay as I am a conscious objector to this insanity. Funny thing how is many of the veterans who are the ones who are opposed to the war, some will calls us traitors, time will tell.

Many many blessings to all.

[jaybee]

Posted by frank samuel (here)
As a old war veteran if the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden where the culprits of the 911 tragedy then Afghanistan would have been the only choice, it was clearly not, that for me raise alarm bells that something was terribly wrong. Now following the money trail we know there's a lot more to this story than meets the eye.

I think that the Iraq War 2.... used 9/11 to settle old scores....which was wrong. And another
'mistake'....???????

[3optic]

Posted by jaybee (here)
If it is all highly classified then there are going to be many, many people who know what
happened...but can't go public...???

Not sure what is meant by "many, many.." My understanding is that individuals involved in highly classified projects aren't privy to the whole picture and therefore don't necessarily know what happened. Those who do have sensitive information that could compromise a cover up are not only threatened with their lives but those of their families as well. Jaybee, your posts indicate to me that you have a marginal understanding of the events and the details of very similar false flag attacks throughout history. You seem to be going out of your way to verify the official story which takes a substantial suspension of disbelief.

I believe that Al Qaeda exists and have used Western Governments for their advancement
and you could say......have used them and their money (when the Russians were involved
with Afganistan) to build the organization.

You seem very young to me jaybee or simply new to these ideas. I recommend more investigation. For one thing Al Qaeda translates as "The Data Base". What radical Islamist group would call themselves that? Isn't it more likely the name of a list of people on a CIA payroll? You seem to be avoiding more obvious conclusions.

[friamin]

I have seen this before and it still holds true.... I think the 911 debate has been beaten to death...We are not being told the whole truth...This should not be surprising to most of us...What we should be entertaining is how do we proceed from here.....We need to transcend this manipulation of our bicameral consciousness and begin to find ways to accelerate our spiritual growth so that we can begin to rise above this level of third dimensional illusion and effect a real change amongst humanity.......

[Snowbird]

I just now finished watching this excellent documentary. Thank you for posting it.

I now know beyond any shadow of any doubt that no Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. In fact, one flew over the Pentagon while a missile hit the Pentagon and penetrated same. It had to have been a missile with a wing span. It could even have been a custom made missile with wing span.

I do not believe for a moment that what flew over the Pentagon was flight 77. Hani Hanjour never flew any jet airliner anywhere. His piloting skills are confined to his lap-dancers.

[Bomack]

Thanks for posting this Uncle Zook! This is what I was referring to when I commented in the '757 Pentagon' thread that it was nothing more than a Magic Act. This is really good stuff, isn't it?! I knew you were already on the right track when you posted the 'Northside Citgo Approach' thread. I will comment more on this and "The Magic Act" as time allows.

Thanks!

[Zook]

Hi Bob (and everyone else),

Posted by Bomack (here)
Thanks for posting this Uncle Zook! This is what I was referring to when I commented in the '757 Pentagon' thread that it was nothing more than a Magic Act. This is really good stuff, isn't it?! I knew you were already on the right track when you posted the 'Northside Citgo Approach' thread. I will comment more on this and "The Magic Act" as time allows.

Thanks!

I merely post a link to the hard work of Craig Ranke , Aldo Marquis, Robert Balsamo et al. But you're welcome all the same. I was going to respond to jaybee (basically by taking him out to the battlefield of wits and bringing him back in a plastic bag filled with atoms and subatomics) ... but I don`t think the moderators here would appreciate that. In a short period of time, I`ve come to love this forum (primarily) for its civility. And while I`m big on humor and the sense of it, I also understand the necessity of discipline, especially when it concerns a topic as serious as the attacks of September 11, 2001. I definitely want to do my part to effect positive energy. So, jaybee, no offense given and none taken. FWIW, I have a nephew and a niece ... they've basically made my moniker stick.


Cheers
Uncle Zook