WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Ixopoborn]

Dear Wade - thanks so much for your continuing devotion to this thread. I have delved into it now on about 6 occasions. On each successive occasion, I have felt more drawn, more compelled to enter and enjoy what is without doubt a vast and beautiful Alladin's cave representation of you and your mind.

There is no doubt left in my mind that this thread is fully blown jewel in this forum's crown!

To Avalonian's who stumble upon this thread like I did some months back, my recommendation is that you decide to pay little visits now and again. Certainly it took me a few dabbles before I became comfortable with the vastness of Wade's experience which he lays out so calmly here.

Thanks again Wade.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ixopoborn:

Thanks for the encouragement. This thread is a warm-up for what I plan to do, and I feel a bit of pressure to deliver, because this is my life’s work and a chance to make a dent in the global situation. The wheels are falling off of industrialized civilization, for those with eyes to see. I don’t want to live through a meltdown, not when there is no good reason for it other than humanity’s semi-sentient ways. We will see how it goes.

I can tell that these science posts are going to last a while, partly because my work hurricane is already cranking back up, after a brief lull. There will likely be more, shorter posts, as my time is going to be limited.

White Science has many limitations, and significant ones rest on its assumptions, and some are:

1. We are objective;

2. Consciousness is a byproduct of chemistry;

3. We have access to all of the available relevant data.

There are many other assumptions that White Science relies upon, which greatly limits what it is capable of, but the above ones will be the subject of today’s post. Kind of like the fantasy that democracies, a free press, and free markets exist, White Science rests on assumptions that are easily shown to be shaky.

The first two assumptions are related, as they assume that physical reality exists independent of us, and is not affected by our consciousness, or any consciousness. The White Science view is that the human mind is the height of consciousness found in the universe so far, and is a byproduct of chemistry. The universe inexplicably came into existence by an unimaginable Big Bang, and will peter out due to entropy some billions of years into the future. Some enlightened scientists will admit that the story as told by science today does not account for consciousness and probably can’t, but they are few and far between:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#materialist

About 99% of all White Scientists today have a world view that can be described as atheistic. I think it may be more appropriate to call it materialist. The materialist framework chalks up consciousness to an “emergent” and transient property of biochemical reactions. The slippery slope of the materialist framework is to regard all consciousness as a biochemical reaction, and raise human consciousness above all others, and thereby justify the treatment of “lesser” life forms in any way that benefits that flower of evolution, humans. That mentality has led to the evils of factory farming, the deaths of a hundred million animals per year in the USA for experiments, and so on:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#factory

To be fair, there is some enlightenment found in evolutionary circles, where humans are seen as “just another animal,” which can tend to deflate our anthropocentric conceits. Ethics toward animal treatment have come some ways in the West, but have an immense way to go. The “bizarre” part for me is that one week in a Silva or similar class can permanently explode the materialist framework of White Science:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#silva

Everybody whom I respect in the FE field is, to one extent or another, mystically-oriented. Brian O had his mystical awakening performing the same exercise that I did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#remote

and he came to it later than others. The rest of us had our awakenings in our late teens or early twenties. Once you awaken, there is no going back to dead, materialistic science. It is hard to emphasize just how radically people’s views of the cosmos change when they get their mystical awakening. A mystical worldview, however, bears no resemblance to organized religion. I see the battle between the materialists and religionists as a war between the Young Souls and the Baby Souls. Both have yet to grow up, and that is OK, but their stunted perspectives will not rule the roost for much longer.

The greatest physicists were, to one degree or another, mystical in their outlook:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#mystical

and would look askance at the efforts of organized skepticism. The “skeptics” are really the foot soldiers of materialism and White Science, and my encounters with them showed me how dishonest they were:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#friends

That last limiting assumption has several levels to it. Those “impossible” microscopes of Rife and Naessens:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#rife

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#naessens

http://www.xenophilia.com/zb0012a.htm

are examples of Fringe Science, standing in the light of day, that overturns some of the most hallowed White Science. I have seen Newton’s Opticks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opticks

sitting on a rocket scientist’s shelf. But modern optical theory gets blown out of the water by those “impossible” microscopes. That White Science refuses to look through the lens of those scopes is why Christopher Bird called Naessens the “Galileo of the microscope.” In significant ways, not much has changed in the last four hundred years.

But microscopes that have been around for nearly a hundred years, with their embarrassing results available to anybody with eyes to see, is the small stuff. On the fringes of White Science in the USA sits the American military and its confiscation of patents. It has done it for more than five thousand patents, and I believe that the lion’s share of those confiscations is around disruptive energy technologies. I believe that Adam Trombly had three of his energy technologies seized that way. The canard used to seize those technologies is “national security,” but that is a Big Lie. Anybody who knows anything about “national security” in the USA knows that it is virtually never invoked for real national security reasons, but to cover up crimes or to protect the economic rackets. Even a man from the “civil service” end of the CIA found that out in no uncertain terms:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#secrecy

But Ralph's experiences are the grade school version. Ralph is from the “White” CIA. The “Black” CIA is the province of contract agents, assassinations, advanced technology from Godzilla’s Golden Hoard and so on. I had a close relative who lived in that world:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#cia

That household name “diplomat” that he worked for is still active, and the focus of many conspiracy theories, many of which are likely true, at least partly. But the level that that “diplomat” plays at is below the Godzilla level, far below. In LaViolette’s Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, he does a good job of showing how antigravity research went “Black” in the 1950s, before I was born. The antigravity technology featured by LaViolette is energy-intensive, so without FE, such technology is going be marginally-effective.

Before Greer really got going with his Disclosure Project and those secret 1997 Congressional hearings, I already knew about some of what was being kept in the Golden Hoard, because one of my buddies was shown some of it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#underground

When Greer began to go big like that, then Godzilla got active, and took out a bunch of the leading names of the effort with strange cancer cases:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#adamiak

People like me watched it all happen from the sidelines, sadly. I have been on that stage before, and they can take you out pretty quickly. Greer survived, but was never really the same. Several years before Greer’s team was taken out, Brian O nearly died after rejecting an “offer” from the American military to be part of a cloak-and-dagger UFO project:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#attack

Brian knew far more than he let on publicly about that situation, and only alluded to his life-threatening experience publicly, because he feared retribution if he named names (who are still around, by the way), but he wrote the forward to Greer’s book on his odyssey on the UFO and exotic technology front:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianbio.htm#_edn24

All that stuff blows the lid off of White Science so far that it makes the physics texts look like cave drawings, and there are many physics professors who uneasily realize it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#rubbish

But White Scientists are highly naïve, by and large,

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#nerd

and all of that is almost instantly dismissed in their halls as a conspiracy theory (with shaky laughter), and that denial is also a natural result of seeing consciousness as a byproduct of chemistry. If nothing intentionally created the universe, then conscious manipulation of the global economy, and keeping technologies under wraps that defy the “laws of physics,” is so far beyond the puny imaginings of White Scientists, and blows their theories so far out of the water, that almost no White Scientist can begin to go there, so they stay quiet in their soft berths, dismissing all such evidence as a “conspiracy theory,” which is actually a highly irrational position to take, but it is the standard one:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#conspiracism

But that does not make the fringe scientists and the conspiracists right, either. Most of what is called “Fringe Science” is invalid, for several reasons, and most “conspiracy theories” are barking up the wrong trees, even wholly fictitious trees, like faked moon landings:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#apollo

Getting to the truth and the gold is like walking the razor’s edge. Because none of us are going to be invited to the underground exotic technology show anytime soon, we have to do stuff like go watch UFOs light up on request:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/ufo.htm#call

or look through a Naessens Somatoscope (there is plenty of footage on the Internet today), or go take a Silva or similar class, and so on. It is possible to roll back the frontiers of White Science that way, for the rest of us.

With all of those limitations on White Science, there is still plenty of what it does that is not subject to “national security” secrecy, Godzilla’s turf protection activities, and so on. Those are areas where I have performed a great deal of study over the years, and future posts will deal with the nature of it, and contrast it with Fringe Science.

Time to go to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

OK, a little on White Science and Fringe Science. As I stated before, Dennis’s heat pump (and Mr. Mentor’s hydraulic heat engine (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#new) http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#glimpse), in their initial applications did not violate the “laws of physics” in any way. Even so, the inventors of the heat pump cut their performance data in half so that engineers would stop laughing at their “impossible” claims ( http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#seven). That was just the mindlessness of engineers and what they “knew,” not something that defied the physics texts. But the idea that Dennis’s heat pump could be married to Mr. Mentor’s engine was an example of Fringe Science or fringe technology, because that was beyond what White Science admitted was possible. Claiming to be able to defeat the Second Law of Thermodynamics is one of the boldest Fringe Science claims imaginable. Einstein had more confidence in the Second Law than in almost any other principle of physics. Mallove publicly stated that such a contraption might not break the second law (http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obi...Message040513/), although he stated privately to me that he did not take the Second law seriously, as he had performed experiments similar to Reich’s that poked holes in it. When I was with Dennis, other scientists approached us with theories that challenged the Second Law. It beats me if the Second Law can be defeated. Reich’s experiments have been controversial for many years (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#reich).

That is Fringe Science and technology, where experiments or working technology can challenge White Science’s theories. Ever since relativity and quantum theory appeared on the scene long ago, there have been many attempts to create a unified field theory, which can weld together gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak forces in the nuclei of atoms, which are the only forces recognized by White Science today. I have seen it alleged that Einstein himself derived it, but it got classified, similar to what is speculated to have happened to Tesla’s work. There has been a great deal of speculation regarding Tesla’s work. Tesla disagreed with relativity and proposed his own counter-theories, and you can trip the light fantastic if you begin to snoop around in allegations around the Philadelphia Experiment, The Montauk Project, and the rest. I have interacted some with that crowd, as has Dennis. If you want hard evidence, you are not going to find it, not there. And some of the players are pretty “out there.” How real are the allegations? Call me skeptical. Brian O and I would usually stay away from that stuff, as it is the usual province of a circus of claims, counterclaims, debunkers, self-styled experts and the rest. Unless you can really go chasing after the evidence yourself (and the chase does not risk your life, which it can in these realms), it is usually not very fruitful to chase after the claims, and it can send you down the rabbit hole.

Allegedly classified experiments and technologies aside, people have been challenging the orthodox perspectives of gravity and electromagnetism, in particular, for a long time, and I have encountered many of those counter-theories over the years, from Velikovsky to the Electric Universe people to Stan Deyo to Paul LaViolette and his subquantum kinetics, and several others that I am aware of. The bottom line is that the resources needed to put those theories to the test are far beyond what a fringe theorist can come up with, and any technologies that could demonstrate that they operate on different principles of magnetics, for instance, are also going to cost a pretty penny, usually far beyond the resources of a fringe theorist or tinkerer.

When somebody like Adam Trombly gets his hands on millions of dollars and begins building FE prototypes, then the “national security” apparatus, including spooks who may well work for Godzilla, get involved, and people like Adam get wiped out pretty quickly (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...bly#post404161). Or, somebody like Sparky Sweet (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet), who was a career scientist who may have had theoretical help, develops something in his garage with a little help from his friends such as John Bedini and Tom Bearden, and eventually came to a grim end. Periodically, people such as Mark would stumble into FE, and would quickly receive a rude awakening (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread392968/pg7).

They all had alternative theories that described how their experiments and technologies worked. We could call it Fringe Science, but when treading into FE territory, it can quickly become a Black Science issue. Rife’s and Naessens’s scopes were highly impressive Fringe Science discoveries. When Naessens tried to patent his microscope, he tried to explain its operation using White Science optical theories, and failed to do so. White Science can’t explain how it works. Yull Brown and Brown’s Gas was similar. Nobody really knows how Brown’s Gas works or what it really is, but Yull was more interested in what it could do, and his transmutation experiments were reproduced more than a hundred times, including by several national governments.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#yull

But those are rather extreme examples of Fringe Science. They may be the most important examples, but the stakes are so high around them, and the environments can become so extreme, that they quickly go far beyond the typical way that science and technology development are conducted. The various alternative theories around gravity comprise gentler territory. It is only slightly gentler, however, when we get into antigravity, because it is joined at the hip with FE, as my friend saw:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#underground

But, I am going to go in directions more like “pure science,” where the political-economic ramifications are not so immense, and show what I learned in pursuing White Science and Fringe Science.

I was always a big picture guy, probably as part of my early training. As I was digesting all manner of information in the early 1990s, one of my key questions was, “How did it come to be this way?” That is what led me down many historical paths. Those investigations became multi-disciplinary, and I did not know it yet, but they became comprehensive investigations. It was not until I discovered Bucky Fuller’s work in late 2002 that I understood what comprehensive or “generalist” meant.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

I had been doing it for many years, but did not know there was a name for it. Fuller said that specialization in White Science was intentionally encouraged, to keep scientists from seeing the big picture:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#slave

So, what has been happening in the past generation, where the branches of White Science began to communicate with each other and develop multi-disciplinary understandings, is something new, and an unwelcome development, as far as Godzilla is concerned. But, as long as all the multidisciplinary stuff stayed on the materialist side of the fence, and did not veer from the “laws of physics,” then it could stay controlled and away from the really important stuff that Godzilla kept under wraps. Any evidence of Godzilla’s existence could readily be dismissed with a chuckle as a “conspiracy theory,” and the nutty conspiracy theories churned out daily by the paranoid (and some in that crowd are on Godzilla’s payroll, encouraging such crazed, tabloid-ish speculation) served to provide very murky waters that evidence of Godzilla’s existence could be easily tossed into, which would never be cleanly extracted from.

But, in many areas of investigation, the findings posed little or no threat to Godzilla’s hegemony, so those areas are pretty much left alone, although you will find plenty of conspiratorial musings in all fringe areas. A great deal of such conspiratorial theorizing is weak, at best. Not only is the evidence weak, but the motive for such conspiratorial behavior is also missing or minimal. Godzilla does not need to micromanage the situation. Just keep FE and related disruptive technologies under wraps, keep an eye on the very few efforts that get very far along, and the game is well in hand. The herd largely manages itself. In a world of artificially-enforced scarcity, there is seeming safety within the herd, and humans are herd animals. That self-herding behavior is responsible for the vast majority of the system’s inertia. For the herd’s size, Godzilla’s efforts are surprisingly modest. On an individual basis, when Godzilla targets Lone Ranger FE tinkerers, the tinkerer does not have a prayer. But, the tinkerers almost never unite their efforts, each trying to become the world’s hero who becomes rich and famous, history’s most important figure even, such are the delusions that beckon (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#grandeur), that such efforts nearly invariably self-destruct before they get very far along.

So, the next few posts are going to show what I learned in the areas of White and Fringe Science, in areas where Godzilla really does not need to play, or if he does, his efforts are mild compared to what he does when the stakes are as high as they are in the FE milieu (if FE happened, it would be Game Over for Godzilla, and he knows it http://www.ahealedplanet.net/risk.htm#radar). The posts will be about geophysics, cosmology, the history of life on Earth and the human journey. It won’t be the essay that I am writing, but a kind “behind the scenes” account of what kinds of issues I encountered along the way, how White Science has been working lately, and where Fringe Science has come into the picture. It will stay away from much Black Science, because I will be dealing in areas where Godzilla is not too threatened.

Time to run off to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Here is how my journey into White Science and Fringe Science went, after I moved from Ventura. As I related earlier, I began studying patents and thermodynamics, to better understand what Mr. Mentor and Victor Fischer had in mind with marrying their heat engines to Dennis’s heat pump. I was also reading up on White Science topics, such as the Michelson-Morley experiment, biographies of people like Einstein, etc.

At around that same time, I became aware of Gaston Naessens and Rife. I had already seen medical establishment gangsterism:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#experience

so what I was discovering was not too surprising. As I dove into my researches, what was very common was that as I rifled through the footnotes of a book that I was studying, I would find interesting sources referred to, and I would obtain them. I “spidered” my way across many subjects in that fashion, sometimes ending up far from where I started. In the notes to one of Barry Lynes’s books on Rife and the cancer racket, I happened upon a reference to and recommendation for Ralph Hovnanian’s Medical Dark Ages, and I sent off for it. I have been Ralph’s friend ever since. Back when I was writing my diary/books that attempted to make sense of what I lived through, I transcribed about eighty pages out of Ralph’s quotation collages. It is by far the oldest part of my site today, transcribed about twenty years ago, before there was an Internet to surf:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mdaq.htm

It was in Medical Dark Ages that I read of the fate of the booklet that saved my father’s life:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#banned

For all that I had been through already, I was surprised that books could be banned in the USA, especially something on “pure science,” like that booklet was. At the same time, my alternative media studies were kicking into high gear, and I discovered Ralph McGehee’s memoirs. While Ralph’s book was not banned, he had to undergo an epic legal battle to publish his memoirs of his CIA days, and the published book is riddled with censorship deletions:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#secrecy

Before long, I was corresponding with Noam Chomsky:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lies.htm#chomsky

and dumped my second book on him, the poor guy. He was gracious, but I was beginning to find out that it was hard to find any takers for stuff like the organized suppression of alternative energy. It was too far “out there” for the rad left, with organized suppression chalked up as a “conspiracy theory” and the notion of FE violating the “laws of physics.”

At the same time that I was immersing myself into those areas, I joined the U.S. Psychotronics organization and met Brian O in the summer of 1991:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#meet

I was encountering lots of Fringe Science. Nothing was sacred in those days. While I was once a space brat when my father worked in Mission Control:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paths.htm#oleary

in about 1991 I obtained the first book that made the case that the public was not being told everything about the Apollo program’s moon landings.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#neutral

Before the 1990s were over, I did the digging that satisfied me that the Moongate thesis was deeply flawed, but I was also seeing an increasing stream of works that made the case that the moon landings were faked, and it was not until 2001 that I did the deep dive and came to the conclusion that the faked moon landings evidence was the kind of “evidence” that the fringes often served up, which turned out to be a collection of uneducated and sloppy interpretation of some evidence, active ignoring of other evidence, and a bunch of highly-strained hypothesizing that came from overactive and paranoid imaginations. While I had dived into many “alternative” areas by that time, going deep on the moon landings experience was good for me. The process was educational, and I recommend that anybody who studies the fringes goes deep at least once in their fringe careers; it can help them understand the dynamics of the fringe milieu. I went deep on the JFK assassination evidence over the years, and in that instance, I found that Gary Wean’s account of his meeting with John Tower, Audie Murphy and Bill Decker not only aligned with all the best assassination evidence, and that none of it contradicted it, but the evidence that has kept coming to light in the years since Gary first published his book keeps reinforcing what Gary claimed to have heard from Tower:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#wean

The entire JFK affair is a case study in establishment cover-ups, but I also developed a healthy skepticism to fringe claims. It does not mean that are all invalid, not by any means, but the vast majority of them are. When Dennis was promoting inventors and their contraptions, he took Mr. Researcher with him on some trips, and usually the inventors did not have anything, but thought that they did, or what they came up with had little or no practical application. Much of what was stolen from Mr. Researcher in the raid:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#mr

was likely not too valid or important, but some was. But if Godzilla thinks that you have something, even if you don’t, he is still going to break your door down to find out. I have seen that play out more than once over the years. That is one reason why I am not really interested in knowing “secret stuff” or storing evidence of it, as I have been asked to do at times. I have already had my office stripped to the walls once already, and don’t want to see it happen again.

At about the same time that I began studying the fringes in earnest, I began to study the “skeptics” that my father had warned me about many years earlier:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#friends

and I was beginning to see what he was talking about. In the eyes of the “skeptics,” there is nothing valid at all to Fringe Science, and they invariably debunked evidence of the paranormal, from psychic phenomena to UFOs, while also attacking homeopathy and anything that was not mainstream science and medicine. I had already experienced and witnessed a great deal of undeniable paranormal phenomena, had heard about people like Sparky Sweet:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

had witnessed how dishonest the medical establishment could be, and so on, but the “skeptics” portrayed themselves as bastions of rationality and honest investigation. Digesting their findings led me to believe that they were either highly incompetent or dishonest, and at that time, I was not sure which it was, or a combination of both.

Then, in 1995, I was browsing in one of the fringe bookstores where I could often be found and stumbled upon a book on Carl Sagan and one of his “skeptical” targets, Immanuel Velikovsky. The book was by Charles Ginenthal. Velikovsky’s thesis was perhaps the first that I encountered that was a grand, multi-disciplinary synthesis. For the next several years, I was on the fringes of the Velikovsky controversy, and still am today. Sagan’s attack on Velikovsky’s thesis in the 1970s killed all mainstream science interest in his theories:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#velikovsky

But the battle was still being waged on the fringes, as evidenced by Ginenthal’s book. I ended up interacting with most of the key players in the Velikovsky controversy. You can easily spend the rest of your lifetime chasing down all of the lines of evidence. Velikovsky tried to align ancient accounts from around the world, the Old Testament in particular, with physical evidence of global catastrophes, and Velikovsky also proposed alternative physics theories, including a challenge to the mainstream theories of gravity. Velikovsky had the interest of fellow Jew Albert Einstein, and when Velikovsky’s prediction that Jupiter would be found to emit radio waves was unexpectedly confirmed, the only book open on Einstein’s desk when he died was Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision.

Welding mythology, archeology, geology, astronomy and physics together in a grand synthesis was indeed ambitious. It could even be called comprehensive. However, the problem with being a comprehensivist is that to go deep on any area takes a lot of time, and nobody can gain a specialist’s in-depth knowledge on all the areas, and it is perilous to spin too many theories by grazing the treetops of many disciplines like Velikovsky did. Velikovsky actually began with the Bible and then looked for evidence that tales of parting the Red Sea and manna from heaven were literally true, and then he developed theories to account for them. He is considered to be the last in a long line of Bible-based catastrophists. Although no serious scientist that I know of takes his new-Venus theory seriously, there have been other grand synthesis theories since Velikovsky that tread very similar territory, such as Paul LaViolette’s.

I have to go work now, but in the next few posts, I am going to show some of the paths that I trod as a result of becoming aware of Velikovsky’s theories and the many paths that led into. In 2000-2001, I decided that one of my goals was to resume my White Science studies, and I wanted to focus on the dating issue in particular. A lot of Velikovsky’s thesis, and those of his followers over the years, hinged on the dates of various artifacts, astronomical events, and earthly events such as the extinction of the mammoth.

A few years after I predicted something like it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#sunny

the 9/11 terror attacks:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#sept11

turned my nation insane:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#wtc

and I soon resumed my career, so my desire to go back to college and resume my math and White Science studies seemed to be on a permanent hold, but in performing the research for my upcoming essay over the past several years, I surprisingly obtained many of the answers that I was determined to find out when I decided to resume my White Science studies, particularly around the dating issue. A great deal of mainstream science’s views on evolution, mass extinctions, Holocene Epoch catastrophes, including the Quaternary extinction event (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#_edn5 ), geophysics and the formation of the solar system relies in great measure on accurately dating Earth rocks, moon rocks, meteorites, fossils, ice cores, tree rings, coral reefs, varves, sea sediments, and the like. I know a lot more about those issues than I did in 2001, and have rather unintentionally satisfied much of my curiosity about the dating methods, although I would still like to go deep on them one day, from a scientist’s perspective. Maybe one day, after I am “retired.”

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

In the middle of this series of posts, I want to provide a framework so that the method of my madness will be easier to understand. For understanding how our world works, on the political/economic/environmental/technical/social front, and how energy drives it all, White Science is plenty. The primary upshot of my essay will be the environmental/economic/political/social ramifications of FE, and White Science is plenty for beginning to understand what FE can mean to humanity and the planet.

For understanding the kinds of energy solutions that Brian O wrote about, for instance, Fringe Science comes into play. For understanding what solutions already exist but are being kept under wraps, that is where Black Science comes into the picture. The primary thrust of my upcoming essay will be in White Science terms, although I will certainly give nods to Fringe Science and Black Science.

And at the end of this series of posts, I will make a pretty thorough post on Black Science and what I know about it. I do not claim to be an insider, but I have run into my fair share of Black Science over the years. The nature of that beast is that I cannot give out too many names, dates, and places, if any. That comes with the territory. If people begin to try to expose Godzilla and Black Science, their life expectancies can become drastically reduced, and I have no interest in playing that game. And if I gave out names, places and dates (and I usually make it a point to not know that kind of information), then I would likely be putting others at risk, and that is a low-integrity way to operate.

I’ll continue with this series of posts tomorrow.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I wrote a 600-page site in 1996, just before I joined Dennis again, which was my first attempt at writing a site. It had essays up to eighty pages long, with no links or bookmarks in it. I heard plenty of complaints

When I began writing the essays that became today’s site, the first ones were my Columbus and fluoride essays:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/columbus.htm

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm

As I was performing my research in the early 1990s, I first read an account that questioned Columbus’s heroic image in Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States. In 1992, on the 500th anniversary of Columbus’s feat, David Stannard published his American Holocaust, which was my big wakeup call on what the “settling” of the Western Hemisphere was like. It was an unmitigated catastrophe for the inhabitants of the Western Hemisphere. The 16th century in the Western Hemisphere was the greatest proportional demographic catastrophe in world history, and as I began looking into it, I stumbled into one of the greatest controversies of anthropology, which was just how big a catastrophe it was.

Stannard argued that the Western Hemisphere likely had more than 100 million in habitants in 1491, and a century later, it was around 8 million, for a decline of more than 90%. Stannard is what is called a “high counter” in those circles. The “low counters” were the early anthropologists such as Alfred Kroeber,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Kroeber

who estimated about 8 million natives in the Western Hemisphere in 1491. The debate has been raging since the 1930s. While Stannard has been derided as a high counter, he demonstrated his chops for the task with his Before the Horror, which made the case that the pre-contact Hawaiian population was closer to a million than the 200,000 found in academia before he published his book. His work has been influencing Hawaiian pre-contact demography ever since:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Stannard#Works

In Before the Horror, Stannard cited many studies of “virgin” populations and their population declines after European contact. The average decline was more than 90%. Recently, demographer Massimo Livi-Bacci took a crack at it, and arrived at a 1491 population of 30-40 million, and the debate continues. But the nature of the debate is what drew me in twenty years ago. The high counters and low counters have had charges of political bias aimed at them, as well as critiques of their methods and assumptions. Because the debate is nearly solely among white people, who were the conquerors, the White Man’s bias is always a background noise to the affair, no matter how scholarly the attempts may be. I have had direct encounters with that bias on the scholarly front myself:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/wikimass.htm

so I am always wary of it. The population studies are multidisciplinary, and combine archeological findings with disease mortality studied with the political-economy of the Western Hemisphere and the first contact and conquest accounts of the Europeans. I have a bunch of relatives who are directly descended from Christopher Columbus and proud of it. That likely had something to do with writing my Columbus essay.

The research on my fluoride essay was inspired by an article that appeared in 1997 in one of my radical political publications that I subscribed to, which was the result of research into recently declassified documents that showed that the federal government was interested in promoting fluoride because there had been fluorine accidents during the Manhattan Project, so promoting fluorine as not only safe but good for people was not just a corporate polluter project, but also a governmental one:

http://www.fluoridealert.org/wastenot414.htm

I would read declassified documents, read books on fluoridation, both pro and con, and crack open my college chemistry textbooks, and so on. At the same time, I was reading up on the history of Western Medicine, the conquest of the world by Europe, beginning with the Western Hemisphere, studying thermodynamics and patents, looking into the moon landings, studying catastrophic theory, etc. It is what I now know is called being a generalist, but I did not know it at the time. For me, it was just a quest for the truth. Those academic pursuits began to overlap, and I found that those can be small worlds. For instance, as I began to immerse myself in the Velikovsky controversy, I encountered Vine Deloria.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vine_Deloria

He was one of the most famous catastrophists, and was the leading American Indian writer whom I already encountered in my American Holocaust studies. I interacted a little with him. We had another overlap, however. As I studied the American Holocaust, I also became aware of the megafauna holocaust, AKA the Quaternary extinction event:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#_edn5

The megafauna holocaust was conjoined with the American Holocaust and catastrophism. The “overhunting” hypothesis was first presented by an American academic in the 1960s, which was also during the USA’s cultural awakening and militant American Indians making noise, such as the American Indian Movement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_Movement

So, the political bias that was the background noise for the American Holocaust debate also became grist for the Quaternary extinction event debate, because if humans were responsible for the extinction of the mammoths and other megafauna in North America, then the prehistoric American Indian might not live up to the nature-worshipping ideal of the Noble Savage. Vine Deloria was right in the thick of the fray, hewing to a catastrophic explanation of the mass extinctions. Charles Ginenthal, following Velikovsky’s lead, wrote a book on the extinction of the mammoth. Why the obsession with the mammoth in North America and Northern Asia? As I looked into the matter further over the years, the megafauna quickly went extinct wherever humans showed up during the past fifty thousand years. Focusing on the mammoth is a huge red herring, IMO, which has become a political football for the various factions. South America had elephants too, and there were no continental ice sheets there, and they quickly went extinct when humans arrived. Humans were an incredibly disruptive influence, with their control of fire, their toolset and their group hunting tactics.

Also, in all those areas that had never seen humans before, the megafauna had no fear of humans, and probably never developed it before they went extinct. The catastrophic theorists argued that either those Biblical events caused some kind of catastrophe that killed off the mammoths, or floods as the glaciers receded did it, or a combination of them. LaViolette does the same thing in his work, which made me raise my eyebrows. He also got some of his facts wrong (or they are very outdated). I’ll present more specifics later, but these areas of debate have been quite interesting to follow over the years, and it ends up being a very multidisciplinary exercise.

Again, I did not know that I was a comprehensivist until one of Bucky Fuller’s pupils said that I was:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

and then I read Fuller and understood. Finding Bucky’s work really helped crystallize my own thinking on a number of areas. Soon after encountering Bucky, about the time that we were invading Iraq to steal their oil:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#invading

I encountered Richard Heinberg and the Peak Oilers. I was highly impressed with Heinberg’s multidisciplinary approach. He actually wrote about FE a little, but kind of semi-ridiculed it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#heinberg

and one of the inventors that he semi-ridiculed was Sparky Sweet:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

Brian O was recruiting me into NEM at about the same time:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#nem

and it turned out that an activist who was heavily promoting my work at the time knew Heinberg, and I was introduced to him. The Peak Oil thesis is unassailable, IMO; we are going to run out of oil if we keep using hydrocarbon energy to fuel our industrialized civilizations, and the only question is when, and it likely will be soon, very soon. I was eager to help Heinberg understand the FE milieu, especially as he wrote about it and seemed interested. How wrong I was. He really did not want to hear about FE. He was on an austerity mission, and soon, many “progressive” publications featured him. He was not interested in interacting with Brian O, either. His message was one of total doom and gloom. It was really a hard one for me to understand, until I began reading the sources that influenced him. I came to understand that Heinberg is a neo-Malthusian:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm#catton

and they really did not want to hear about abundance. After watching their drumbeat of doom for almost two years, and the “left” and “environmentalists” eating it up, I wrote those essays about Heinberg and his Peak Oil and neo-Malthusian buddies. It has only been in the last year or so that I also came to understand what had likely attracted me to Heinberg’s multidisciplinary approach: he used to be Velikovsky’s assistant!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Heinberg

It is indeed a small world in these circles.

Time to run.

Best,

Wade

[Melinda]

Posted by Hughe (here)
...When will general public see movies about Nicola Tesla? I want to see it one day...

I reached page 86 of the thread today and came across Hughe's post (partially quoted above.)
There is this Yugoslav film about Nikola Tesla, called The Secret of Nikola Tesla, with the one and only Orson Welles playing JP Morgan. http://youtu.be/dNGSOCzXv80
I quite enjoyed it - mainly because the actor playing Tesla portrays him with a poetic and otherworldly mystique. Wade, you recently (briefly) mentioned speculation about Tesla's work, so I thought this might be in keeping with the bright light of science currently beaming its theme through the thread

Apologies if it's been posted already between Page 86 and here. When I discovered it I spent the first few minutes of it wide eyed with joy at the fact the movie even existed. It has an offbeat charm that almost seems fitting for the (sadly still) fringe nature of the subject.

Thank you for the recent posts. An abundance of links.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Quickly, before I go to work….

White Science has a lot going for it, and a lot that is bad about it. It is that way for about any human endeavor that you can think of. In college, we were taught to read the professional literature, such as can be found in Nature or Science. Each subspecialty of science has its own specialist publications. Specialist literature can become very difficult to read and understand, because it has not only highly specialized language, but the concepts can be very difficult to grasp, where you have to spend years in training to get to the point where you can understand the issues, arguments and evidence. It can get very arcane, and a lot of it is literally meaningless because it sits under the rubric of a false paradigm, and the issues can be like how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

When Galileo was forbidden to refer to observation (“Just look through my telescope!”), he then couched his arguments in math, as a way to get around the Church’s censors. Newton did something similar. In Joseph Schwartz’s The Creative Moment, he made the case that those tactical decisions sent a great deal of White Science off in the wrong direction, making it unnecessarily arcane, turning the scientific establishment into a priesthood. There have been studies of scientific papers that concluded that the numerical presentations in most of them were false or misleading, due to uncontrolled variables and other flaws. The best scientists were fully aware of the deficiencies in using math in science. Einstein said that the more impressive the math in scientific theories and models, the less likely they would conform to the real world.

I crunch numbers for a living, supposedly depicting economic reality with my efforts. When you do that for a living, numbers alone fail to impress. In fact, Wall Street has created incredibly complex financial instruments, and it galls me that I am going to Manhattan to take a class in complex financial instruments. Wall Street has essentially created a false reality with all of its shenanigans, similar to how a lot of White Science has ended up operating. Many White Scientists unknowingly serve evil empires with their work, and a similar situation has occurred in the area of high finance. Most of the practitioners fall under the spell of all of that theory and math, and actually believe the BS, like Alan Greenspan, with his worship of Ayn Rand. It was sad to watch, in the middle of the meltdown a few years ago, to see Greenspan essentially admit that his theories and models did not reflect reality. Duh!

Unfortunately, most of what passes for economics today is obsessed with the exchange aspect of economics, like money, banking, taxation and the like. None of that is relevant in the slightest to the big economic issues that humanity faces. The real economy runs on matter and energy, not money and banking, but the fiction is that all those “wizards” on Wall Street, the Fed and elsewhere have some keen understanding of how the world works and can be trusted to run things. What a crock.

The best scientists try to make their work accessible to those outside of their cloistered specialty, and I have digested a great deal of that over the years. Einstein himself eagerly read such works when young. There are good ones and bad ones. Sagan was a charlatan on that front:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#sagan

but I have seen the guy worshipped in the halls of White Science on many occasions. That says something about White Science that is not pretty. In upcoming posts I will get into some detail on this issue.

Off to work.

Best,

Wade

[Limor Wolf]

Hi Wade,

Interesting to read this last post of yours, it kinda answered my (internal) question as to why you wished to resume white science studies in 2001. on one hand you wanted to go deep on the dating issue, which can be an assiting tool in measuring and testing some of the important theories. on the other hand, being such an aware person as you are to the limits and biases of the mainstrean education establishments, It is somewhat surprising. (not expressing an opinion either way :) , However it becomes quite obvious that when you chose to delve into any one subject, you do it with studing and considering the issue at hand from all its angles, like reading pro and con flouridation books.
To be quite honest, most of us delve in mainly on the one aspect that we feel more attracted to within our own views or by what we are willing to inspect. talk about justification...

I have a brief question though, I wonder whether (to the best of your knowledge) in recent years, where there any advancment in some areas of white science like biology, biochemistry,physics etc. towords a more 'fringe' conclusions, or is it stil very much kept intact within the 'safe limits' of where Godzila would expects it to stay?

There seem to be so many types of 'holocausts' in our human history, that undoubtedly a world based on free energy will minimize or better yet, diminish alltogether all those different catastrophes.


Thank you very much Wade, as always

Wandering ponderer - thank you for the Tesla movie link and for your thoughtful posts


Cheers,

Limor

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Limor:

Great post, big subject, and one that I was planning on covering more in this series of posts. Yes, Fringe Science and technology can become White Science and Technology, or Black Science and technology, or it can stay on the fringes. It is really difficult to generalize here, but the political-economic situation around the Fringe, White or Black Science and technology is often what dictates the way that the issue goes.

As Max Planck alluded to and somebody else said more bluntly, White Science advances funeral by funeral:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#real

Almost all radical breakthroughs are greeted by White Science and technology as “That’s crazy!” The Wright brothers being ignored by White Science for five years after they first flew is a classic example:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#wright

Far too often, unfortunately, if the breakthrough is really good, the pioneer gets hung out to dry while the establishment steals it. It happens all the time in medical science:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#steal

Detroit stole what it could not suppress, as I found out long ago from one of the unwitting thieves:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#inventor

Everything that Mr. Mentor invented was either stolen or suppressed:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#funeral

I have seen examples where Fringe Science pioneers, long after they were wiped out, had their discoveries “discovered” by White Science. It is happening today with the “discovery” of nanobacteria:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanobacterium

Rife was seeing those forms, smaller versions of bacteria that orthodoxy said did not exist, nearly a hundred years ago:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#rife

but you are not going to find his name mentioned in those debates on nanobacteria, incredibly.

I don’t shrink from controversial subjects, because that is where incredible truths can be found. But there can also be far less than meets the eye there, too. Because the evidentiary lines can go pretty deeply, one of the best “cheats” is to immerse yourself in both ends of the issue, because each side is going to present their best evidence and arguments. Then you can follow each side of the argument, and see where it takes you. Sometimes you have to go pretty deep, and often it will go too deep, to where you need years of training to even begin to get there, and you have to stand back and say, “beats me.” On most of it, however, you can go there with a little time and effort.

For instance, I had a live blood reading done by a dark field microscope about a year after I discovered Rife and Naessens. The scope did not have the Naessens scope’s resolution, but it was a pretty amazing experience to have my blood read that way. The tech put it on a video screen so that we could both see it. The practitioner was familiar with the Naessens forms, and described some of them in my blood. I have also seen debunkers try to invalidate it all, and one effort was so poor that it seemed like it was half-banged out on the debunker’s lunch hour. Again, what do you think might be more useful, movies of life or snapshots of death? The medical establishment chooses death. Robert Mendelsohn even went so far as to say that death was the medical establishment's god:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#mendelsohn

I had a death threat issued in my vicinity just last year on a breakthrough cancer treatment. Again, the medical gangsters are more vicious than the energy gangsters. Of course, the establishment hacks dismiss it as a “conspiracy theory,” but when the death threats are made almost within earshot, you find out differently.

Regarding fluoridation, for instance, when declassified documents begin to confirm the “conspiracy theories” of sixty years ago:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm#harold

it gets one’s attention.

But that does not mean that all the fringe stuff is valid, not by any means. The faked moon landings issue is a red herring, where disinformation is continually recycled:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post478010

Several years ago, I wrote an essay on the pitfalls that people encounter when exploring the fringes:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/orthodox.htm

Those are not areas for quick-study artists, and I try to keep my toe in the water on most of the subjects that I cover on my site, because there are continually new developments, and I wish I had years of free time to go a lot deeper than I already have, but my daily life is too demanding, so I do all of this in my “spare” time, and my wife puts up with it.

But, one of the classic statements about the breakthroughs is that today’s heresy becomes tomorrow’s dogma. That is when Fringe Science becomes White Science. Fringe Science can also become Black Science. Those five thousand patents that got the national security seizure often became Black Science projects.

I have written it before on this thread, in one of my first posts at Avalon:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ll=1#post92348

that I was asked to review a manuscript that told of the fates of literally hundreds of exotic materials and technologies that came to the West when the Soviet Union collapsed. Brian O asked me to review the manuscript. When the author tried to publish a book that recounted his interactions with those Soviet Bloc scientists and technicians, a former USA Secretary of Defense literally delivered a death threat to him, if he tried to publish his book. That is the province of Black Science, and there are levels of it that go far beyond the military establishment.

I can’t reveal much publicly, but when Brian nearly died after refusing an “offer” to work on a UFO project for the military,

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#attack

Brian believed that Black Science technologies were used in the murder attempt. From what I know, I don’t doubt it. A number of the murder attempts that Adam Trombly has been subjected to used Black Science techniques:

http://www.spectrumradionetwork.com/...gy-part-1.html

Sometimes, with people like Adam, his technologies don’t become Black Science so much as they are already Black Science projects, and he is playing in areas that Godzilla explored long ago, and 35th-generation technology already exists, and Adam was making a first-generation version of it. Down those technical paths lie FE and other disruptive technologies, and Godzilla is vigilant. People like Adam get taken out pretty quickly when they begin going down those paths. Their technology gets seized or destroyed, “legally” or illegally, they get the offer they cannot refuse, or they are the targets of efforts to wipe them out, and murder attempts are not unusual, I am sorry to report.

Of course, the naïve White Scientists cannot begin to comprehend that territory, so it is all denied, usually by dismissing it as a “conspiracy theory,” or if they don’t deny it, they will parrot the “national security” mantra while rationalizing that evil treatment as somehow justified. You have to see it to believe it.

I’ll give another little peek into some of the Black Science world.

I don’t know if I will ever be able to reveal the name of the household-name diplomat that a close relative worked for as a contract CIA agent, but I will relate a little anecdote about his spook days. As I have written, he eventually drank himself to death:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#cia

which I am sure was related to the emotional toll of his secret life. He would go on week-long “benders,” where he was continually drunk. That was how he often spent his “off time” from the spook world, which was undoubtedly also one of the reasons for his checkered public career. One day, he was in the midst of one of his benders, and he got the call. They needed him to go play spook. He told them that he was pretty far under and in no shape to play spook that day, and they said that it was no problem, and they would be by soon to pick him up. They picked him up in one of those spook vans that you see in the movies, and as they were driving him to their spook facility, they injected him with something. In less than a minute, he was stone sober. I don’t know what the heck they game him, and he did not know either, but I doubt that you can buy it over the counter.

A lot of the fringes that stays on the fringes, to never become either White Science or Black Science and technology, stays there for a reason. Not necessarily because it is not valid, but that is often the case. I don’t like using the words “crackpot” or “crank” – those are part of the debunker lexicon that is often thrown at anybody that is not pursuing White Science and technology - but a great deal of the fringes is simply not valid. The Wright brothers’ efforts, for instance, was their life’s work, and I have read that if they did not do what they did, that mankind might not have learned to fly until the 1920s, they were so far ahead of their contemporaries. Laboring in obscurity and even ridicule is all-too-often the path of the pioneer, but the invalid stuff suffers the same fate, and the person pursing it also can make it his (usually - women are rarely that foolish ) life’s work, obsessively pursuing it, usually with friends and family who barely tolerate the person's obsession. In the early stages, breakthrough fringe science and technology looks a lot like the invalid stuff. Most of my family thinks that I went off the deep end long ago. I just don’t talk about it with them, and they let me be “weird.”

Others, however, get a sniff of the magnitude of the game I am playing, and fixate on me. That has led to painful situations and estrangements. Those who fixate on me usually end up attacking or betraying me, when they realize that they really can’t play the game that I am playing, or they go off the deep end themselves, and some ended up in rubber rooms or eventually will. You need your feet planted firmly on the ground to play these games.

On the whole, I would rather be dismissed as a weirdo than be fixated on. Those who can actually go there with me and develop productive understandings are vanishingly few. I don’t say that I am looking for needles in haystacks because I have some kind of theory. A lifetime of woeful experience on these matters has informed my perspective, as well as trading notes with my few fellow travelers such as Brian O and Dennis.

I have a busy weekend ahead of me, but I plan to make at least one post on the White Science and Black Science issue.

Best,

Wade

[Melinda]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
...Unfortunately, most of what passes for economics today is obsessed with the exchange aspect of economics, like money, banking, taxation and the like. None of that is relevant in the slightest to the big economic issues that humanity faces. The real economy runs on matter and energy, not money and banking, but the fiction is that all those “wizards” on Wall Street, the Fed and elsewhere have some keen understanding of how the world works and can be trusted to run things...

I'm so tired of hearing that the cycles and downturns of the 'world economy' are somehow a necessary occurrence; as if people losing their jobs, their homes, their health, is just as natural and unavoidable as the changing of the seasons. It's a lie.
It's a sad state of affairs when comical clips like the one below seem to offer a clearer perspective on the world's finances than the economic experts in the mainstream news. http://youtu.be/NOzR3UAyXao
To my mind, money is one of the strangest illusions currently experienced. It's a complex point. But even saying something like that makes some people break out in a rash, fearing the only alternative would be communism (and its shoddy history) or some other kind of control mechanism. The vision I've always held about the potential of new energy solutions is that we'll start to need money less for our basic daily needs; then other, more valuable words can start to take its frequent place in daily conversation. Words like collaboration, adventure, "no problem" and "my pleasure." It's just a little vision, but it feels worthwhile.

Limor... Interesting question about the potential crossover of scientific perspectives. I look forward to the answer.

Update: To avoid confusion, I wrote the above before Wade's answer appeared

[Wade Frazier]

Hi AWP:

To respond to some of your posts… Orson played Mr. Big in his last days a few times it seems:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_pvAK...eature=related

Yes, the economic system is rigged, to keep everybody in fear and on the edge. That is how Godzilla stays in power, and his minions are many, and the sheeple play along. If FE can make it past the organized suppression and humanity’s inertia and foibles, none of life’s necessities will be subject to the market system. All food, clothing, medicine, housing, transportation, communication, and personal effects will be freely provided to all, as it will require very little human effort to provide it. The rest of the economy will be pretty small, and that may be subject to some kind of market discipline, but that should fade away pretty quickly, and money and exchange-related jobs and institutions will quickly go the way of living in caves and slavery.

Off to chores now.

Best,

Wade

[Limor Wolf]

Hi again,

It seems as if Max Planck has related to the natural change of generations. It might be that any progression needs a good long digestion before it reaches a hold in the human brain, not to mention becomes a consensus and something strong enough to lean on.
In a way, it is strange, because there are things like a working FE devices that are an actuall proof. 'it is crazy', sure, but it is working, and the possibilities absolutely worth further investigation, whats surprising is the easiness of the mind to say 'no' and refuse new information accesses.
The few individuals who are allowing themselvs to have considerations beyond the existing paradigm boxes are free thinkers and according to what Wade say, there must be plenty of those in the service of black science.

If there is any consolation for inventing something and having a breakthrough only for it to be stolen ,either for it to be used or supressed by the establishment, is the thought process that this long and hard procedure has required in order for it to become real. this is eternal and can not be stolen. it has been placed on the 'ether' and has more chances to be realized. I am risking writing it here, but I will anyway - thoughts, intentions, realizations are a strong method of energy, and can be equally as strong as actions. at this point in our human understanding that will probably not be any lifeline for those individuals who were beaten by the establishment, and their names have been forgoten, but I believe that in the grand scheme of things it is valid.

You imply that fringe science can become black science, you probably refer to the technologies and not to the people, or are you, Wade? some scientists/inventors must be 'bumping' into something without actually putting their hearts into the broader perspective of it, whether it is medical, scientific discovery, physics etc. and might be willing to be 'convinced' to join forces with secrecy. I only guess this type of scenario exists as well.

It can be interesting to know what can be another reason besides 'not really valid' to allow a fringe science stay on the fringe...


Cheers,

Limor


p.s


Your wife seems to be a supporting pillar in your life, you a are very lucky.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Limor:

I am about to go out the door for my busy day, but Fringe Scientists have become Black Scientists. That “offer” that Brian could not refuse was one of those offers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#attack

The recruiting pitches can be very seductive. My relative who became a CIA contract agent was recruited with the macho/patriot/James Bond pitch, and I doubt that he ever really figured out the evil game that he was part of. When the subtle plays do not work, then it can become more frank. Some Fringe Scientists became Black Scientists because the big carrots and sticks got brought out, like the, “Take this bag of $10 million and come work for us, or your family will be dead by dawn” trick. They also play the “Take the money and quit, or your family will be dead by dawn” game. To rich guys that they cannot buy, it can be “Stop what you are doing, or your family will be dead by dawn.”

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#windmill

There are many ways that the game is played, but the goal is the same: domination of the world economy, and hence, humanity. The worst of them would rather wipe out humanity and make Earth uninhabitable rather than lose that god-like power. The dark side is dark indeed:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#serving

Some Fringe Scientists stay on the fringe not because their work is invalid but because they did not take the offer. Many of them are dead, but some, like Adam, survive the murder attempts and other mayhem. If anybody becomes a grave threat, however, and that means that they may potentially upset the rackets/markets:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/risk.htm#radar

then they are very harshly dealt with. Only people like Dennis can survive that stuff for long, and they all feel the abrasion, which people criticize them for, as they are no longer ideal candidates to lead the charge. Heck, none of us are ideal candidates, but I would stack Dennis, Adam, and Brian up against any of the many others out there who think they can lead the charge. Those are great men who lived through unbelievable experiences, and Brian’s adventures shortened his life, and I will be surprised if Dennis lives too many more years. His body has a lot of miles on it.

Yes, my wife is one of my blessings.

Running out the door now.

Best,

Wade

[CdnSirian]

"thoughts, intentions, realizations are a strong method of energy, can be equally as strong as actions."
I'm glad you included that Limor. I believe it is true. I believe that strong and clear intentions result in the most effective action, and that of lessor if not the least resistance. I also understand that that is what Wade is aiming at in creating his choir of lambs.

From the heart and head, a strong and clear intention to increase an abundance paradigm...with a matching outcome of action.

[Wade Frazier]

Amen, CdnSirian, Amen.

[Robert J. Niewiadomski]

The phenomenon of denying truth in what someone else is reporting to them is "natural" for some people. It is an autonomic reaction. Often absentminded one. Topics like FE are extreme examples of that reaction. That type of personality can deny you in such a situation like reporting seeing celebrity on the street, or hearing something in the news... It has something to do with their assumption about the world not being compatible with audio-visual input they receive. They simply say it is impossible. And move on... They are sure their assumption is rock solid. They even not think of verifying it...

My kids behave sometimes that way The results are pitiful We talk about it and we learn together to verify our assumptions... It is hard...

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Robert:

All paradigms are built on assumptions, and all paradigm shifts come from questioning the assumptions of the dominant paradigm. “Reasonable” people like to think that their assumptions are based on rock-solid empirical facts, but poke any assumption hard enough, and it wiggles.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This post will get into the details a little between White Science, Fringe Science and Black Science, and I will focus on the climate and ice age issues. White Science is really pretty young, on the timescale of human civilization. The ancient Greeks had mathematicians and what we might call scientists. Many ancient civilizations created engineering marvels, and what survives is generally worked in stone. There is still plenty of “how did they do it?” theorizing, but nobody on the White Science scene has had to invoke mystical or advanced technological explanations for the monumental architecture and other feats of engineering and construction. While many of the technical feats of Rome, for instance, were about building aqueducts and other imperial infrastructure, much of it was designed to impress the masses and justify the position of the elites. I am not sure that there is a significant exception in the study of ancient civilizations. But civilizations rose and fell, and advanced astronomical knowledge, for instance, would be lost when the civilizations almost inevitably collapsed, with the remnant populations eventually dismantling some of the monumental architecture for other uses, and many Angkor and Mayan structures, for instance, were completely reclaimed by the jungle and were largely out of memory, until they were rediscovered relatively recently.

During Europe’s medieval period, much knowledge was lost, helped along by the Church’s bonfires, and the ancient Greek writings were only reintroduced to Christian Europe during the Spanish Reconquest, when Islamic libraries became available to Christian scholars.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#toledo

But modern Western science, in its current phase, is considered to have begun in 1543, when Copernicus and Vesalius published their seminal works, although the struggle against inertia and dogma was a hard one. Science and industry was not really ascendant and triumphant until the Enlightenment of the late 18th century. It was only then that Earth was suspected to reside in something eventually called a galaxy, and that our galaxy was one of many:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy#..._other_nebulae

The idea that Earth had ice ages is a younger concept, not first proposed until 1837:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Agassiz#Ice_age

and like any radical new theory, it took a while for it to take hold, as more evidence was amassed. Even today, there is controversy as to what exact interplay of factors causes them, but there is little disagreement on what the causal factors are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age#Causes_of_ice_ages

In his Plows, Plagues and Petroleum, one of the world’s leading climate scientists, William Ruddiman, gives a professional’s overview of the state of ice age White Science. The major factors considered are similar to that Wikipedia summary. The primary reason for the gradual cooling of Earth for the past 55 million years or so is thought to be a decline in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The sun is thought to be gradually growing brighter as it ages, and will one day consume the Earth (see Ward and Brownlee’s The Life and Death of Planet Earth, for instance). Sunspot activity is one piece of evidence for variability in the solar output, but it is thought to be a modest influence on Earth’s climatic variability, at least according to White Science.

The effects on the carbon dioxide levels are thought to be an interplay of sources, primarily volcanoes, and its removal, primarily by weathering (with creation of the Himalayas, a relatively recent event on the geological timescale, being the primary source of weathering, as fresh rock is exposed to be weathered by the weak carbonic acid in rainfall). Ruddiman, as well as every other serious scientist that I have seen in this area of study, says that White Science is under siege from the hydrocarbon lobby and its minions, as they try their best to absolve the prodigious burning of fossil fuels from having any significant atmospheric effects. No serious scientist disputes the role of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (three-atom and larger molecules) in the warming of the atmosphere. The White Science consensus is that Earth would be an ice ball if not for the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide. It is really hard to argue against it. The hydrocarbon lobby has created a controversy that does not deserve to exist, and Ruddiman is trying to take on the hydrocarbon lobby’s propaganda, after having his face rubbed in it when he made waves several years ago with his theory that humankind has been warming Earth for several thousand years with its activities, which have increased the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide and methane concentrations.

The biggest variable in the 100,000-year glacier intervals for the past 2.5 million years, however, is thought to be the variability in Earth’s orbit. There are three cycles of Earth’s orientation to the sun – the eccentricity of its orbit, its axial tilt toward the sun, and the wobble of its axis (the precession of the equinoxes) – which have 100,000, 41,000 and 22,000 year cycles. The White Science community is virtually unanimous that the interplay of those cycles is the primary driver of the advancing and retreating ice sheets for the past 2.5 million years. There are also positive and negative feedback effects:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age...lacial_periods

and the orientation of the land masses certainly are also involved. With the Arctic Ocean virtually landlocked, the expectation is that this ice age will last for millions more years until the land masses retreat back toward the equator sufficiently to free the Arctic Ocean and move the land masses to warmer climates. One theory is that the closing of Panama’s isthmus millions of years ago was the trigger for our current ice age, but it is a minority position. As with all White Science areas, there is plenty of debate, scientists trying to make their marks, honestly disagreeing, and in this area, commercial interests are obviously fouling the waters, as some scientists have sold their souls, and about the most famous one was once Brian’s colleague:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sold

to Brian’s disgust.

Anyway, that is a brief summary of the White Science on the issue. Doug Macdougal’s Frozen Earth is a good introduction to the ice age issue and the history of the science.

In previous posts, I gave a little history of my Fringe Science explorations. While the best scientists often try to make their work accessible to non-specialists (like Andrew Knoll’s Life on a Young Planet, or Ward and Brownlee’s books, or Ruddiman’s, or Brian Fagan’s many generalist efforts in anthropology), I have also read plenty of works aimed at non-scientists from the fringes, and not many of them held up to scrutiny, or they took a very idiosyncratic approach to the evidence, and I am sorry to say that I found it in LaViolette’s works. I wrote earlier about the controversies over the megafaunal extinctions, but I found that everybody who disputed the impact of humans was grinding an ax of some kind, either protecting the memory of their ancestors, like Vine Deloria did, or heavily weighting the ice sheets of the Northern Hemisphere or celestial events such as comet impacts.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post502525

Those explanations simply do not line up very well, if at all, with the available evidence. It is one thing to disagree with the orthodox theories, but I believe that a fringe theorist has an obligation to his audience to at least summarize the orthodox position and its problems before trying to make the case for his fringe theory.

LaViolette barely touches the orthodox theories before proposing interstellar dust clouds that make the sun’s output highly variable and also would dim the sun as far as how much sunlight hit Earth. When he discussed why are having an ice age now, he only mentioned the Panama Isthmus, failed to even mention the orbital variables, and then proposed his cosmic dust explanation (see Earth Under Fire, p. 137). He repeatedly cited Newsweek in his notes on scientific matters, which means that he is not addressing a scientific audience. It is one thing to propose his galactic superwave theories as alternatives to the White Science perspective, but I think that he owes it to his audience to at least say what the orthodox position is. His only mention of the orbital variations first proposed by Milankovitch is a brief mention and dismissal on page 321 of Earth Under Fire. While there are plenty of unresolved issues with the Milankovitch Cycles:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

it is the dominant explanation for the timing of the ice sheet advances and retreats of our current ice age, and I doubt that anybody significant in the field is saying that Milankovitch’s theory is wrong. There is plenty to LaViolette’s theories to make one think, but his work skims the surface of the issues, and that can mislead his audience.

LaViolette does something similar with the megafaunal extinction issue. He states that the megafaunal extinction event was the greatest in North America (p. 207, Earth Under Fire), but the extinction of South America was arguably worse, as was Australia’s:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quatern...tinction_event

Not a single species that originated in South America over 100kg survived the joining of the continents a few million years ago and the subsequent arrival of humans. As I have written, the focus on North American megafauna and the ice sheets or impacting bolides is a red herring, IMO, and fails to acknowledge that the megafauna on those three continents quickly disappeared shortly after the arrival of humans, and Australia’s happened 40,000 years before those of the Americas.

And what does Black Science have to do with any of it? None that I can see, but maybe there is some. But Black Science usually takes place in highly-controlled environments, and paleontologists and anthropologists are digging all over the planet. I have heard tales of cover-ups of disquieting evidence, but they almost invariably are just stories, and ones that I find increasingly implausible, as I have done my studies over the years. When fringe archeologists aver that they found some ancient civilization, one way out of alignment with the current orthodox thinking, the evidence is almost always pretty shaky.

I am trying to not pick on LaViolette here, but that kind of writing is very common in Fringe Science, especially when the theorist is trying to create some grand unified theory of everything. There are plenty “theory of everything” theories out there.

My grand theory is that the unified field is God, but that is not a very satisfying scientific answer, I am afraid. But until consciousness enters the equations of White Science, it will be playing a small game. There is a lot that LaViolette avers that I can get along with, such as that the universe is not expanding from a Big Bang, that there is an ether, and so on, and there are plenty of people promoting similar theories. I am not saying that White Science always right, obviously, but most Fringe Science is not valid. The debunkers call much of it pseudoscience, but that is a very fuzzy epithet that has been thrown around indiscriminately by people like Carl Sagan.

I am going to go play husband now.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

OK, here is some on Black Science, and it is related to another issue that I am pursuing regarding Brian’s legacy:

http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=61.0

You can see one of the respondents playing at being a lawyer, trying to turn the issue into a court of law, which was a totally inappropriate response, as were his others, but so it is with establishment defenders. When I sacrificed my life, which resulted in springing Dennis from jail and us hiring Mr. Big Time Attorney:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#big

I got a real-world education in how the legal system works. He gave the IRS a black eye in the U.S. Supreme Court, but during our travails in Ventura, he once said something like, “If you are trying to find the truth in a courtroom, you are looking in the wrong place.”

Black Science is never going to be dragged into court, and it is naïve to think so. The closest that it came to that was probably when Greer mounted those Disclosure Project joint Congressional hearings in 1997, and then nearly every key player got strange forms of cancer immediately after the hearings, with most of them dying:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#adamiak

That is what happens if you begin to poke around in Black Science, especially when it is threatened with exposure. In Marxian terms, keeping Black Science under wraps is about controlling the means of production. FE, antigravity and the like, if they became publicly available, would quickly make the world’s power structure obsolete, which is why Godzilla watches those avenues so closely.

Before one of the hearings on Capitol Hill, when Greer was just getting his feet wet, he was in the impressive chambers, looking at all of the bronze plaques, and an insider said to him, “You are now playing against the varsity team.” Greer was never the same after 1997, but of what he says he experienced, I have little doubt about, and I’ll get to some of those converging lines of evidence soon.

Black Science sits way above our puny public institutions. The situation reminds me of that scene with Marlon Brando in A Dry White Season, where he says something like, “The law and justice are distant cousins, but in South Africa they are not on speaking terms.” It is that way with Black Science and our public institutions.

Paul LaViolette did a good job, IMO, of tracking the history of electro-gravity research and when it went black in the 1950s, before I was born (in his Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion). But Black Science probably goes way, way back, even back to ancient mystery schools, and the science of consciousness was likely far more developed than that of technology in those days.

In the modern era, Black Science really got going around the time of Tesla. Electricity was a radically-transforming technology, which could separate the source and use of energy in ways previously unimaginable, and when Tesla began pursuing energy that people did not need to pay for, then J.P. Morgan quickly pulled the rug from under him:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#tesla

The feds seizing Tesla’s notes right after he died was just par for the course.

Of course, the big problem with Black Science is that it is covered under a veil of secrecy. Sometimes the veil is penetrated, however briefly, and we can get a glimpse, but generally those who go to the inside on Black Science get a one-way ticket. The UFO issue really ramped up after World War II, and some early events show how the Black Science secrecy apparatus was still evolving, and the Roswell crash will suffice as an example. The initial crash and recovery was covered in the newspapers like just another story, although a spectacular one. The Marcel and Haut testimony years later:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness....27s_testimony

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell...ut_controversy

provides evidence that the security apparatus was still forming when the incident occurred. The debunkers have been all over it for a long time, but the crazed explanations by the Air Force (like the crash test dummies) and others leave many observers strongly doubting the official story.

The evidence is strong that the national security state took over the USA after World War II. Hiring death camp Nazis to guide the CIA’s policy toward the Soviet Union is evidence of where things were headed:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#nazi

The debunkers would have us believe that there is good reason for keeping so much secret behind the veil of national security, but anybody with real world experience in the milieu knows that “national security” is almost invariably code for “covering up crimes or protecting the rackets.” Even a “White” effort like Ralph McGehee’s was subjected to that kind of treatment:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/mcgehee.htm#secrecy

Very few people have the integrity and guts to even try to do what Ralph did, and his battle clearly shows why virtually no critical memoirs exist by ex-CIA personnel. And that is from the “civil service” end of the CIA. That CIA man who delivered the offer of a billion dollar bribe to Dennis:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#offer

was also almost certainly from the civil service side of the CIA, but he was delivering the offer on behalf of private interests, which provides more evidence of the half-joke that the CIA is the standing army of the Fortune 500:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#gehlen

as it was founded by Wall Street lawyers, and people like Allen Dulles quickly “rehabilitated” many of Hitler’s biggest industrial supporters in Germany and put them right back into the positions of power that they had while shepherding Hitler’s rise to power. A lot of that is in the public record, with declassified documents. The federal government’s push to fluoridate the USA’s water supplies is horrifying enough, just from the documents that have been declassified:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm#harold

and we will likely never know how deep it all went, and only the naïve can dismiss the allegation that fluoridation is part of a program to intentionally dumb down the people of English-speaking countries. That dynamic goes all the way back to the English Civil Wars of the 1600s, when the “rabble” began to have a say in its governance and the state lost its ability to inflict violence on its subjects with impunity. As people like Chomsky make the case, and he is anything but a conspiracist, the science of controlling what people think developed into a method of population control in the West ever since the English rulers lost their ability to rule by violence. That became a science in the 20th century:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lies.htm#big

But that is almost all from the “White” side of the fence. The Black side is all-too-real, but you are not going to encounter it unless you do stuff like try to bring disruptive energy technology to the public, like we did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run

or Adam Trombly did:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post501338

or Sparky Sweet did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

and then you find out real quickly about how the world really works, and the foot soldiers of Black Science appear. The spooks never write memoirs, or if they do, take it with a grain of salt. I am always very skeptical when alleged spooks come forward. They are tainted by their background, and some are playing a game, not really coming forward with the truth, and because of the secret nature of the spook world, much of it totally unaccountable to the world’s governments, anybody can say, “I was a spook, and I am now coming forward with my story.” What made the Disclosure Project witnesses so compelling is that most were not spooks, but people who saw what they should not, and they came forward. It is hard to portray Gordon Cooper as a nut:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Cooper#UFO_claims

and Ed Mitchell co-chairing those Congressional hearings with Greer, and his subsequent statements:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_M...#Views_on_UFOs

sure makes the UFO debunker’s job hard, so they play all sorts of games of denial, invoke national security, play lawyer, and so on. When I got Brian’s NASA biography published:

http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/oleary-bt.html

one of the leading UFO debunkers challenged Brian’s Martian credentials, and enlisted a NASA historian to help in his debunking exercise. I initially found it hard to believe that they would do that. The astronauts did not have a problem with Brian’s Martian credentials, and they would have known. Heck, all the debunkers had to do was get Brian’s autobiography from 1970 to see his account of his astronaut interview. That was when I asked Brian for more meat for his Martian credentials, and he gave me his Alan Shepard and Wernher von Braun anecdotes:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianbio.htm#mars

to head off the debunkers if they were going to begin a campaign with NASA, but the debunker acted like he had thoroughly debunked Brian’s Martian credentials. I had already encountered the dishonesty of the “skeptics” too many times already:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#dishonest

but that debunker’s performance really made me wonder about their intelligence, and I don’t mean intellect. When people are heavily indoctrinated into their paradigms, they can literally go brain dead when encountering information that counters their indoctrination, and they violate the most elementary logic while attacking the information that falls outside of their paradigm, or threatens it, and they can be some of the "smartest" people you ever met. I saw it many times during my FE journey:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#naive

As I have stated, wanting to know the truth is far more important than any mental horsepower that a person can lay claim to. Nobody is more blind than those who refuse to see.

My relative who was a CIA contract agent sure was not going to go public with his spook activities:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#cia

but once in a great while, somebody from “middle management” speaks out, like John Perkins did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/other.htm#neocolonialist

and you can see the USA’s State Department and Peace Corps (a neocolonial tool) trying to debunk his credentials in about the stupidest way that I can think of, by showing that he published some mystical books. To me, that just provides evidence that Perkins eventually woke up.

http://peacecorpsonline.org/messages...7/2079016.html

I became aware of Greer’s Disclosure Project somewhere around the mid-1990s, I think, but I did not pay too much attention until I heard about those Congressional hearings, and when they all came down with bizarre forms of cancer soon after the hearings, I was not surprised. Some of the witnesses who testified also went public with what they testified to, national security laws be damned, and what I found highly interesting is that the exotic technologies that they described, including FE and antigravity, I had already heard about from my close friend, who was invited to a show of those technologies:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#underground

When data points like that line up, one’s doubts quickly evaporate.

Again, I knew of Sparky Sweet from a close associate who visited his lab:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#sweet

but was not told who Sparky was or where he lived, and the next year, when I met Brian, he told me who that old guy was:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

and it was not until several years later that I found out that Sparky lived just down the road from us as we were being wiped out in Ventura. Again, those converging lines of evidence tend to remove any doubts about the truth of such matters. Some of the converging lines of evidence, coming from rock solid witnesses, some of which you have seen me name, and others who wish to remain anonymous, I cannot really talk about publicly, which is the nature of the beast, unfortunately, but I will summarize what I think is very likely the case in the Black Science world.

1. Many who took the money (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#bearden ) went to work on the Black Science side of the fence. That is where Fringe Scientists become Black Scientists, although for many of them, it was not exactly an exercise in free will, but more like being made an offer that they could not refuse.

2. Many other Black Scientists came from the White Science side of the fence, usually via the military or military contractors, such as the aerospace firms.

3. Those are the people who play with the toys that we don’t get to benefit from. Antigravity, free energy, exotic materials that would blow you away, and other marvels exist in the Black Science world. But Godzilla calls the shots in that world, but with heavy compartmentalization, indoctrination and various tricks, some technological, very few on the inside ever get any inkling of the big picture.

4. A great deal of that Golden Hoard came about from reverse-engineering captured ET craft, but on the ET scale, our Hoard is really full of primitive copies, and that is because humanity currently has a highly rudimentary understanding of the nature of consciousness (http://projectcamelot.org/wade_frazier.html ). When enough hearts and minds awaken, making FE and heaven on Earth happen will be easy. Awakening is the hard part, and Godzilla does his best to keep humanity asleep and easily manipulated, and his bag of tricks is impressive.

5. Many contingency plans have been made at the Godzilla level, and they can be stomach-turning. There are plans to depopulate the planet of several billion “useless eaters” and turning the relatively few survivors (less than a billion) into a pliant slave population. Many survival enclaves have been built underground and off-world for Godzilla and his minions, and one plan is to terraform Mars if Earth’s surface becomes uninhabitable. A person in my circles was invited to go help them, but that is a technical project that is even beyond Godzilla’s abilities at this time, but his arrogant insanity knows no bounds.

6. Fortunately, cooler heads have prevailed regarding some of the evil plans, and I believe that the people who gave my friend the exotic technology show are from the “White Hat” faction that is disenchanted with Godzilla’s plans, and Greer has stated that most of the global cabal favors FE and the related technologies coming forward, because they won’t want to try to live on Mars. From what I have seen, I am not a big doubter of what Greer reports on that score ( http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#cabal )

7. The elected and retail governments of Earth are way down the food chain from Godzilla and his minions. They control the governments and get them to do their bidding (the sitting American president is totally out of the loop http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#presidents ), but because self-interest is the order of the day in a world of scarcity, Godzilla does not need to micromanage the situation and the governments, the corporations, and the inventors and their allies end up doing most of Godzilla’s work for him, and the sleeping masses own the lion’s share of the responsibility for this situation, not the Black Hats, the White Hats, the Lone Rangers like Dennis and Adam, etc. Again, for the herd’s size, Godzilla really does not have to work all that hard to keep the upper hand over humanity. We are our own worst enemies.

8. In the end, Godzilla sits on his throne because virtually everybody is asleep. When people like Brian O wake up, then their rides become hard ones, and sometimes they pine for the good old days when they were asleep (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sherry ). My awakening was a brutal one that I would not recommend to anybody, but it made me who I am today, and I would rather be awake and getting by rather than be rich and asleep, which is an opportunity that I have passed up a few times in my life.

9. While the Black Science world is all too real, be very wary of people who claim to come from that world or know people who do. What I have disclosed here is not entirely infallible, but is actually a conservative version of the information that I have been exposed to. Most of what have been exposed to was not from Black Scientists telling me or anybody close to me anything, but just getting glimpses of what is behind the curtain as my fellow travelers and I had our preposterous journeys.

I may write more later, but that about wraps up what I have to say about Black Science. Again, my upcoming essay will be firmly grounded in White Science, because the biggest problem is that the masses are scientifically illiterate, and they are easily led astray when snooping into Fringe Science, which is filled with the deluded, the incompetent, the mistaken, charlatans and others with invalid things to say, and those who have succumbed to Godzilla’s derailing tactics. There are many casualties in this field, and I don’t want to see any more, or be responsible for any more, but many people just have to go find out the hard way. My primary motivation on that score is to help as many people possible achieve productive understandings without learning the hard way or disappearing down the rabbit holes, and many beckon.

I am going to work now.

Best,

Wade