A New World Order: Exposing the Luciferian Agenda

[9eagle9]

Mitochondrial DNA is neutral, its affected by consciousness. Yes its self persevering some of the older races understood this is how they could keep their own less corruptable blood from being destroyed entirely.

A very interesting if cinematic view of mitochonrial dna is found in the later Star Wars movies. It is what allowed the force to move through a person, but depending on their psychological make up they could be swayed towards the dark side of the force or the light.

Posted by Vivek (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)
Thanks Vivek for your last three posts ... I was hoping you would speak more about your own understandings as opposed to just posting materials from other sources.

I am really glad you are a member of this forum. You put a great deal of effort into the most relevant subject matter. As you know, I had a hard time with this thread but that was a few weeks back and thanks, in part to this thread, and a few others, I have been able to resolve most of my questions.

I am still confused as to who is who in the various cosmological explanations and even more confused as to who might be "good guys" and who might be "bad guys" in these myths.

I think its more up to each individual to explore one's identification with any mythological being and by doing so, may be able to know oneself more honestly and at a deeper level.

But I would be lying if I said I wanted to know all because I am enjoying the search, but that is speaking selfishly.

I do have one wish... and that would be to see... to live in a world where no being participated in the practice of animal/human sacrifice. But until I stop eating meat, to make that wish is probably hypocritical.

Dilemmas, dilemmas... will they ever end?

A lot of the sources brought in have their personal commentary in them to some extent and they make connections differently than I may, so I don't subscribe to any one in particular. It is difficult to pick through it all because it is so mixed up. As far as the whos who that is really difficult but if we can form enough of an idea about the modus operandi of how these energies operate we can weed out where they have been and that helps I think.

Actually, you just reminded me of something considering possible genetic manipulation and eating meat (or ingesting anything). It's mitochondria. They are the power houses for the human body but the interesting thing about them is they have a completely separate genetic code than us and their DNA is circular (it is also passed on through the mother). Circular DNA is for bacteria, viruses, and archea but somehow this mitochondria found it's way into the human genome and the relationship reciprocally beneficial. In short, it provides acts as our power houses and we preserve it's survival in our own genome. So how would we have gotten along without it?

[Zencat]

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)

A very interesting if cinematic view of mitochonrial dna is found in the later Star Wars movies. It is what allowed the force to move through a person, but depending on their psychological make up they could be swayed towards the dark side of the force or the light.

As a huge Star Wars fan and someone who works with energy (Prana, mana, Chi, life force, etc.), I found your take on this intriguing! Next time I see George Lucas (who often has breakfast at my favorite cafe), I'll tell him this!

[modwiz]

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)
Mitochondrial DNA is neutral, its affected by consciousness. Yes its self persevering some of the older races understood this is how they could keep their own less corruptable blood from being destroyed entirely.

A very interesting if cinematic view of mitochonrial dna is found in the later Star Wars movies. It is what allowed the force to move through a person, but depending on their psychological make up they could be swayed towards the dark side of the force or the light.

How'd you get so smart. You must have a man telling you this stuff.

[9eagle9]

I just took his balls...

[Jeffrey]

Mitochondrial DNA



The endosymbiont theory implies that there should be considerable autonomy for mitochondria. This is not the case. Mitochondria are far from self-sufficient even in their DNA, which is their most autonomous feature. Mitochondria actually have most of their proteins coded by nuclear genes, including their DNA synthesis enzymes. For example, human mitochondria have 83 proteins, but only 13 are coded by mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA). Even those proteins which are coded by mtDNA often have large subunits that are coded by nuclear DNA. These nuclear-coded mitochondrial proteins must be labelled and transferred from the cytoplasm across two membranes. This intricate, hand-in-glove working between mtDNA and nuclear DNA presents a major difficulty for evolutionists. They have yet to propose a reasonable mechanism by which so many genes could be transferred intact (along with appropriate labelling and control mechanisms) to the nucleus.

Plants and other ‘lower creatures’ may have more mitochondrial genes than the higher animals do, but they still fall far short of the number necessary for free-living existence. Plants have also been found to have much more non-coding mtDNA than the ‘higher’ animals. Referred to as ‘junk DNA’ by evolutionists, it is held to have been eliminated by evolution from the mitochondrial genomes of the higher animals, to the point that humans have virtually no non-coding mtDNA. Evolution seems to be remarkably unpredictable in its handling of ‘junk DNA’, allowing it to accumulate ‘haphazardly’ in the nuclear DNA of higher animals and man, but ‘efficiently’ eliminating it from mtDNA. It doesn’t seem reasonable for evolutionists to have it both ways.

There are more important differences between mtDNA and nuclear or prokaryotic DNA. The main one is that the genetic code for mtDNA differs from the standard DNA code in slight but significant ways. Why? Evolutionists make much of the universality of the genetic code, saying that it offers strong support for common descent of all living things. If this is true—if the code is so highly conserved in evolution through over a billion years and millions of species—then even a few exceptions to the rule are hard to explain. (On the other hand, from a design standpoint the answer may lie in the simpler protein synthetic machinery served by mtDNA, which uses fewer tRNAs, and is less specific in codon recognition.) Lack of introns is another important difference. The ‘higher’ mtDNA has no introns, whereas nuclear DNA and some ‘lower’ mtDNA do have them. Again, the bacteria from which mitochondria are supposed to have evolved also lack introns. Thus, we’re asked to believe that the pre-mitochondrial bacteria sporadically evolved introns as they became ‘primitive’ mitochondria, and then lost them again as eukaryotic evolution ensued. As evolutionists grapple with the biochemical details, the endosymbiont theory becomes more and more cumbersome and vague.

Source: http://creation.com/mitochondria-created-to-energize-us

[Jeffrey]

Chloroplast and Mitochondria

The major difference between mitochondria and chloroplast is that the latter contains thylakoid membranes and pigment molecules, whereas the mitochondria membranes contain respiratory enzymes not found in chloroplast membranes. Chloroplasts essentially are those parts of plants cells and algae where photosynthesis takes place. Mitochondria on the other hand are located in the cytoplasm of cells which have a nucleus. These turn nutrients into molecules that fuel the cells.

Chloroplasts have the ability to use light to convert carbon, derived from carbon dioxide into sugar. Mitochondria on their part break down simple sugars into carbon dioxide and release energy. Chloroplasts are larger and have greater complexity than mitochondria, and they have several critical functions to perform, besides the generation of ATP. Apart from converting carbon dioxide to carbohydrates they synthesize amino acids, fatty acids, and the lipid contained in their own membranes.

Mitochondria are to be found in both plant and animal cells, whereas chloroplasts are found only in plant cells. The former have a structure composed of a prokaryotic cell, whereas Chlorplasts are made up of stacks of thylakoids surrounded by a fluid called stroma. According to some theories, mitochondria exist because of endocytosis of aerobic bacteria, while chloroplasts are around because of the result of endocytosis of photosynthetic bacteria.

Chloroplasts exist only in plant cells and lend the green color of most plants. Mitochondria on the other hand are found in both animal and plant cells and are engaged in the production of ATP. To use simple layman language, mitochondria in animal cells changes energy into forms that animals can use, while chloroplasts in plant cells convert sunlight into energy that plants can use. From this it follows that mitochondria in a sense are the power plant in the animal cells, because it generates energy. Chloroplasts provide the green color to the plant due to the chlorophyll present in them.

Mitochondria cells are 1 to 10 um long in length. These can change shapes, get around, and divide into two. The cell is surrounded by an envelope of two membranes. The membrane on the outside is smooth while the other one is marked by what are called cristae.

Photosynthesis happens only in plants. This is because only plants contain chloroplasts. Thus we can see that mitochondria and chloroplasts are the building blocks of life for plants and animals respectively in the sense that they provide nourishment to the organisms. The two are also representative of the dividing line between the two kingdoms of life on earth-the animal and the plant.

These two structures are markers of two philosophies of life form if one may use the use the term. One that is self sustaining, manufacturing its own food, the other that is dependent upon the former as the primary source of food, but far more complex and evolved way of life in many other aspects.

Summary:
1. Chloroplast contains thylakoid membranes and pigment molecules, whereas the mitochondria membranes contain respiratory enzymes not found in chloroplast membranes.
2. Chloroplasts are found in plants only while mitochondria are found in both plants and animals.
3. Chloroplasts help in photosynthesis.

Read more: Difference Between Mitochondria and Chloroplast | Difference Between | Mitochondria vs Chloroplast http://www.differencebetween.net/sci...#ixzz1yr2N67Lv

[Fred Steeves]

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)
I just took his balls...

I hate when that happens...

[9eagle9]

Oh my god, that's exactly what HE said!!

Posted by Fred Steeves (here)

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)
I just took his balls...

I hate when that happens...

[Jeffrey]

Hrmm. Following this line of thought...

Midi-chlorians

Midi-chlorians were intelligent microscopic life forms that lived symbiotically inside the cells of all living things. When present in sufficient numbers, they could allow their symbiont to detect the pervasive energy field known as the Force. Midi-chlorian counts were linked to potential in the Force, ranging from normal Human levels of 2,500 per cell to the much higher levels of Jedi. The highest known midi-chlorian count belonged to the Jedi Anakin Skywalker (over 20,000 per cell), who was believed to have been conceived by the midi-chlorians.

Midi-chlorian counts were measured through a blood test; the Jedi used this method to locate Force-sensitive children before their Order was purged by the Galactic Empire. With the rise of the Empire, research into Jedi and the Force was banned, and though midi-chlorians continued to be tested for, sometimes by the Empire itself to root out hidden Jedi and other Force-sensitives, knowledge of them was diminished and inquiries into them were branded as illegal medical research. Midi-chlorians were only rediscovered after a New Jedi Order was founded.

When not forbidden, studies of midi-chlorians occurred among those who could master the Force and those who could not. While medical teams worked to understand the relationship between midi-chlorians and the Force, Jedi healers performed their own studies of the organisms. Even more esoteric studies were conducted by the Dark Lord of the Sith Darth Plagueis, who discovered a way to manipulate the midi-chlorians to create new life.

Source: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Midi-chlorian

Extremely interesting motifs there.

Back to chloroplast and mitochodria for a second. We could have had, at one time, a chloroplast-like organelle within our bodies that functioned like the fictional midi-chlorian. It could have worked like photosynthesis but if it followed the advanced make-up of humans compared to plants I don't think it would work quite the same. It could be that these chloroplast-like organelles in humans used a more highly developed type of chlorophyll that absorbed or transmuted the subtle energies of the etheric body into usable energy for the physical. Where plants would use the sun, these (in humans) would use our inner sun so to speak. No need to ingest foodstuffs. We would still have mitochondria but the supply would come from these midi-chlorian like organelles transmuting our chi/prana/ki or what have you into practical energy for the physical vessel. What would function like chlorophyll may not be green in these oraganelles but it could give off a glow considering the spectrum of energy it would access. Puts a new twist on light bodies, eh? Luminous blood? DNA, midi-chlorian type organelles, blood drinking?

All that would need to be done would be to switch off the astral markers to produce this fictional organelle and poof - we now have to rely on ingesting food to provide the glucose for our mitochondria and we don't get any of the other benefits associated with these divine organelles that access the source field.

Only problem would be that it wouldn't be encoded in our DNA if it was an endosymbiot, unless it is there in the astral body but it's just "switched off" ... I've read that reincarnation became nessecary because the soul would start to decay otherwise and it replentished it's energy so to speak through the mechanics involved with taking on a physical body. I've also read that these parasitic entities that don't want to incarnate would decay too but they maintain themselves in the astral because they feed on us. What better way for them to replentish their food supply than by switching off your energy supply and making you rely on the physical (an inefficient and unnatural way to renew the vitality of the soul). Then attaching a foreign installation to your astral makeup so you have to reincarnate because the astral installation can't ascend past thier (ie Archon's) heavens? And so goes the cycle of rebirth and soul harvesting.

Dinner time? "Oh, yea we are having leftovers, just pop it in the microwave and reheat."

Best to keep them sheeps dumb. Don't let that pig see the slaughter house lest he get wise an' run off.

I'm going to chew on this some more later, but I am interested to know what y'all think about it.

[9eagle9]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biolumi...ce#cite_note-0

¤=[Post Update]=¤

**** look at what that articles says...that was a stab in the dark but those key words are 'lighting me up"

The luciferase acts as a catalyst to speed up the reaction, which is sometimes mediated by cofactors such as calcium ions or ATP. The chemical reaction can occur either inside or outside the cell. In bacteria, the expression of genes related to bioluminescence is controlled by an operon called the Lux operon.[2]

[Jeffrey]

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biolumi...ce#cite_note-0

¤=[Post Update]=¤

**** look at what that articles says...that was a stab in the dark but those key words are 'lighting me up"

The luciferase acts as a catalyst to speed up the reaction, which is sometimes mediated by cofactors such as calcium ions or ATP. The chemical reaction can occur either inside or outside the cell. In bacteria, the expression of genes related to bioluminescence is controlled by an operon called the Lux operon.[2]

Genetics of Bioluminescence

The bacterial luciferin-luciferase system is encoded by a set of genes labelled the Lux operon. In A. fischeri, five such genes (LuxCDABE) have been identified as active in the emission of visible light, and two genes (LuxR and LuxI) are involved in regulating the operon. Several external and intrinsic factors appear to induce and inhibit the transcription of this gene set and produce or suppress light emission. More research is being done to improve our understanding of these processes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_...ioluminescence

That is interesting. Everything is a microcosm. Still reading.

[9eagle9]

And opening a file from 04 I am finding out some things I have journaled about 'radiance'.

[9eagle9]

Mitochondirial DNA was stimulated by something in the environment. (air, sea, earth ...?) like it was in the very air. Eating certain forms of plant and sea life kept it flourishing. Sea water was indicated.

Radiation destroys it. Make sense radiation is used by the darker less well intentioned we share the earth with to screw people up.

And because of the nature of the coincidences as I am writing this , this is somehow related to spontaneous combustion. Somehow....hmmmmmmm

Phosphorus ?

When the local environment didnt support whatever the mitochondrial dna was supported by they had cravings--ate constantly of low quality food (obesity in America!).

Radiation destroyed it.

Certain crystalline values supported it.

Metal ingestion supported it however it was ingested. Silver in particular .

Passed along the mother's side of course, or maternal value . It could be passed along indefinitely through the mothers side .

It could pop up in people who were mitochondrially...uhm..... not radiant...????? .(lol) ....throw backs of sorts no doubt startling parents who had glowing babies...lol.
Not sure if that is referring to the mitochondrial or just genetics of certain bloodlines that would seemingly be lost and then suddenly pop up in future generations of families that hadn't a clue of what was going on.

Interestingly enough what makes me think (if I have expressed this thought) this has run or been influenced about meridian lines , but cutting off the index finger of the right hand inhibited the mitochondrial dna . Whether this was true or a superstition who knows.

And because this document is over 500 pages long I think I'll leave it at that till tomorrow.

If anything in there sets off a flash of inspiration I'd certainly be interested in it.

[Jeffrey]

Alright, let's bring radiation into the mix. Let's consider that these kind of organelles exist within our astral blueprint, but they have been tampered with and rendered inactive. Now, what if a non-affected soul incarnated into an affected bloodline. That could work out like this possibly:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post511410

If that's not the case it could be something else, but the point would be that the process of re-establishing what was wronged is inevitable. What if this was going to happen en masse, and the Archon's (or what have you) knew this was going to happen. We've all heard the conspiracies to the effect that the boom in technology came from extraterrestrial/extradimensional intervention so to speak. As if they gave us crumbs and we took off from there (especially around the mid 1900s). What if the kind of radiation given off by the devices we use everyday acted like an inhibitor for this process of re-establishing the harmony of the body in all of it's glory (dampening the process of the unaffected sublte body/soul transforming the affected physical vessel back to it's proper state).

The background radiation in the world now is pervasive to say the least.

http://www.emfblues.com/Wireless-Rad...Radiation.html

The link above is hardly a source, but it serves as an example. There are plenty of other places to find information on radiation of this sort.

Also, considering alchemy and the philosopher's stone. That could serve as an artificial means to create a product that produces the same effects as the hypothetical midi-chlorian, chloroplast-like organelles we once had. Ingesting the stone could produce the same effects in the body as said organelle. We know that the Archon's (or whatever beings that hold this type of agenda) are trying to steal and exploit this creative force that is natural to our being. Annunaki harvesting gold. I've heard the official story, but what if they are just high-tech extradimensional alchemists seeking a way to mimic the natural creatrix-like force inherent to us? They wouldn't want us gaining that power back because it would pose a problem considering the crop of their energy farm (us, earth). It's switched off at a metaphysical level so to speak, but they knew it would start to creep back in (something about tendencies to resort to a natural/harmonious state) so they provide us with the technology to flood the airwaves with radiation. Int'resting.

Something to do with window's of opportunity? Deluge? Cataclysms in mythology responsible for the destruction of these civilizations like the Atlanteans etc etc ?

[Jeffrey]

Fluorescence is the emission of light by a substance that has absorbed light or other electromagnetic radiation. It is a form of luminescence. In most cases, the emitted light has a longer wavelength, and therefore lower energy, than the absorbed radiation. However, when the absorbed electromagnetic radiation is intense...

Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence

Bioluminescence is the production and emission of light by a living organism. Its name is a hybrid word, originating from the Greek bios for "living" and the Latin lumen "light". Bioluminescence is a naturally occurring form of chemiluminescence where energy is released by a chemical reaction in the form of light emission. Fireflies, anglerfish, and other creatures produce the chemicals luciferin (a pigment) and luciferase (an enzyme).The luciferin reacts with oxygen to create light. The luciferase acts as a catalyst to speed up the reaction...

Characteristics

Bioluminescence is a form of luminescence, or "cold light" emission; less than 20% of the light generates thermal radiation. It should not be confused with fluorescence, phosphorescence or refraction of light.

Ninety percent of deep-sea marine life are estimated to produce bioluminescence in one form or another. Most marine light-emission belongs in the blue and green light spectrum, the wavelengths that can transmit through the seawater most easily. However, certain loose-jawed fishes emit red and infrared light and the genus Tomopteris emits yellow bioluminescence.

Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioluminescence



Phosphorescence

In common use, phosphorescence also refers to the emission of light by bioluminescent plankton, and some other forms of chemoluminescence.

Phosphorescence is a specific type of photoluminescence related to fluorescence. Unlike fluorescence, a phosphorescent material does not immediately re-emit the radiation it absorbs. The slower time scales of the re-emission are associated with "forbidden" energy state transitions in quantum mechanics. As these transitions occur very slowly in certain materials, absorbed radiation may be re-emitted at a lower intensity for up to several hours after the original excitation.

An extremely intense pulse of UV light in a flashtube produced this blue phosphorescence in the fused silica envelope.

Phosphorescence of the quartz ignition tube of an Air-gap flash.
Commonly seen examples of phosphorescent materials are the glow-in-the-dark toys, paint, and clock dials that glow for some time after being charged with a bright light such as in any normal reading or room light. Typically the glowing then slowly fades out within minutes (or up to a few hours) in a dark room.[1]

The study of phosphorescent materials led to the discovery of radioactivity in 1896.

Ironically, white phosphorus, from which phosphorescence takes it name, does not actually exhibit this property, but rather, chemiluminescence.

In a chemiluminescent reaction, the direct product of a reaction is delivered in an excited electronic state, which then decays into an electronic ground state through either fluorescence OR phosphorescence, depending on the spin state of the electronic excited state formed. This is possible because chemical bond formation can occur on a timescale faster than electronic transitions, and therefore can result in discrete products in excited electronic states.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemiluminescence

Obverse sides of the same coin? Homonyms?

UPDATE

Fluorescence, Bioluminescence, and Phosphorescence

...As marine aquarists, we already inhabit an esoteric world of complexities that those not in the hobby find mystifying. Though this perception is not entirely justifiable, fluorescence, bioluminescence, and phosphorescence are three truly amazing coral qualities that enhance the mystery. That so many marine organisms possess one or more of these attributes is as astonishing as it is confusing. Though no definitive answer exists to explain the “why” question, we do know how these phenomena occur. There are also a few interesting theories about the functions of the “essences,” as I like to call them.

The following is a brief article which is intended to translate some of the intense scientific work on this subject into a more digestible explanation. Essentially, the discussion centers on some of the highlights of the topic, without getting too technical.

Bioluminescence

Bioluminescence is a term used to describe light created by living organisms. It is what gives a firefly its shine, makes waves glow at night, and lights up a deep-sea anglerfish lure. The animal itself is the light source; or rather, chemicals within the animal’s body excite electrons to give off light. Bioluminescence is truly special because it requires input from no other energy source than the food the animal consumes. Certain types of proteins, called luciferins, store energy in the form of excited electrons. These electrons are freed from their bonds by enzymes called luciferases. Once free they become less energetic, and in doing so, release energy in the form of photons, or light. Virtually all bioluminescent reactions occur in this manner, whether created by bacteria, vertebrates, or anything in between.

Though the chemical constituents are vastly different, bioluminescent reactions are similar in effect to that of a glow stick (chemiluminescence). That is, both sets of reactions rely on two separate molecules, which combine in an oxidation-reduction (redox) reaction that yields light and a third molecule of lower energy.

Fluorescence

On the atomic level, fluorescence and bioluminescence are similar. In fact, light in general is simply a byproduct of the excitement and subsequent calming of electrons. The difference is in the trigger. Whereas the bioluminescent trigger is the luciferin/luciferase complex, fluorescence is triggered when a pigment absorbs light from an outside source. In the case of anthozoan fluorescence, the external source is sunlight (or artificial light in an aquarium). As the light passes through the anthozoan’s tissues, some of it is absorbed by fluorescing pigments. These pigments make electrons available for excitation, which in turn give off light as they return to their normal energy levels.

Fluorescence accounts for more color varieties than either bioluminescence or phosphorescence, because the emitted color is dependant upon the fluorescent pigment which absorbs the incoming light. The resulting hue is determined by the excitement level the electron achieves. Originally, fluorescence was believed to come from a single pigment, the Green Fluorescent Pigment (GFP). Since that time, a number of similar molecules have been discovered. This group is referred to as the GFP-like Chromo-Proteins (CP).

Marine aquarists know that blue (actinic) light typically yields the most intense fluorescence. Ultraviolet light will produce an even stronger effect. This intensity occurs because blue and indigo are the most energetic colors of visible light, and therefore provide the most energy to excite electrons. White light, which carries all colors of the visible spectrum, contains more than enough blue light to induce fluorescence. Unfortunately, the other colors often drown out the glow, making it harder to see. Aquarium lighting can be adjusted to enhance the fluorescent qualities of the livestock, but in the ocean you must be at least 33 feet underwater to see the same effect with the naked eye. Beyond that depth, the water has filtered out most of the colors other than blue, allowing divers to witness naturally occurring fluorescence.

Phosphorescence

Phosphorescence is very similar to fluorescence in its chemistry, however the manifestation of the results is different. Rather than create bright light which ends as soon as the external light source is removed, phosphorescence is less intense but remains for a time after the external light has ended. Phosphorescence is what you see when a child has glow-in-the-dark stars glued to the ceiling. Instead of absorbing and releasing energy instantly, the electrons re-release the energy more slowly than it was absorbed. Though some cnidarians exhibit phosphorescent tendencies, often the light is too weak to be seen with the naked eye. It may also be overwhelmed by bioluminescent or fluorescent light produced by the same animal. Interestingly, bleached out coral skeletons sometimes visibly phosphoresce.

Read more here (with pictures/diagrams): http://www.qualitymarine.com/News/Fe...nce:-(10/11/11)

[Jeffrey]

Melatonin concentrations are particularly high in mitochondria and the cell nucleus. DNA in mitochondria are particularly vulnerable to damage because mitochondria have fewer DNA-repair enzymes than nuclear DNA and because mitochondrial DNA lack the protective histone proteins which nuclear DNA have. By its ability to penetrate readily into mitochondria, by directly protecting mitochondrial DNA and by inducing antioxidant enzymes in mitochondria, melatonin may greatly protect mitochondria.

Source: http://www.benbest.com/nutrceut/melatonin.html

Chloroplasts, the pineal gland, photosensitve receptors, chlorophyll, melatonin ... apophenia? ...

...

[Chester]

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biolumi...ce#cite_note-0

¤=[Post Update]=¤

**** look at what that articles says...that was a stab in the dark but those key words are 'lighting me up"

The luciferase acts as a catalyst to speed up the reaction, which is sometimes mediated by cofactors such as calcium ions or ATP. The chemical reaction can occur either inside or outside the cell. In bacteria, the expression of genes related to bioluminescence is controlled by an operon called the Lux operon.[2]

Quite interesting these terms - note Malanga's research revealed one of the three light being entities called Lux. - see Houman's Horus-Ra thread as this is covered extensively. And of course, hard to miss the term luciferin and luciferase. Good find, 9eagle9. Strange how all this is starting to connect.

[Chester]

Posted by Vivek (here)
Alright, let's bring radiation into the mix. Let's consider that these kind of organelles exist within our astral blueprint, but they have been tampered with and rendered inactive. Now, what if a non-affected soul incarnated into an affected bloodline. That could work out like this possibly:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post511410

If that's not the case it could be something else, but the point would be that the process of re-establishing what was wronged is inevitable. What if this was going to happen en masse, and the Archon's (or what have you) knew this was going to happen. We've all heard the conspiracies to the effect that the boom in technology came from extraterrestrial/extradimensional intervention so to speak. As if they gave us crumbs and we took off from there (especially around the mid 1900s). What if the kind of radiation given off by the devices we use everyday acted like an inhibitor for this process of re-establishing the harmony of the body in all of it's glory (dampening the process of the unaffected sublte body/soul transforming the affected physical vessel back to it's proper state).

The background radiation in the world now is pervasive to say the least.

http://www.emfblues.com/Wireless-Rad...Radiation.html

The link above is hardly a source, but it serves as an example. There are plenty of other places to find information on radiation of this sort.

Also, considering alchemy and the philosopher's stone. That could serve as an artificial means to create a product that produces the same effects as the hypothetical midi-chlorian, chloroplast-like organelles we once had. Ingesting the stone could produce the same effects in the body as said organelle. We know that the Archon's (or whatever beings that hold this type of agenda) are trying to steal and exploit this creative force that is natural to our being. Annunaki harvesting gold. I've heard the official story, but what if they are just high-tech extradimensional alchemists seeking a way to mimic the natural creatrix-like force inherent to us? They wouldn't want us gaining that power back because it would pose a problem considering the crop of their energy farm (us, earth). It's switched off at a metaphysical level so to speak, but they knew it would start to creep back in (something about tendencies to resort to a natural/harmonious state) so they provide us with the technology to flood the airwaves with radiation. Int'resting.

Something to do with window's of opportunity? Deluge? Cataclysms in mythology responsible for the destruction of these civilizations like the Atlanteans etc etc ?

Fascinating again, Vivek... what took so long to get to this? Did you just come upon the information that stimulated your theories? Anyways, awesome investigation as this makes lots of sense. I wouldn't necessarily know the degree of truth to this possibility, but it sure seems quite plausible.

I wish we could figure out a comprehensive solution to the archon problem as I see the archontic structure as the actual source of all human suffering. What comes to mind though is that the minute I see an us / them dynamic... us being humanity as a whole or at least non archonically aligned humanity as a group, and then consider the archontic structure at all levels of its being, I fear I have sunken into the us / them dynamic which I then fear fuels our imminent defeat.

Whereas if we could understand the dilemma while at the same time avoiding seeing the archontic forces (at whatever level we are in contact with them) as part of a bigger us its my opinion that we would then be able to transform the type of food supply we provide to the archons which would in turn result in either their adaptation to the new food (the higher vibrational emotions) or that they would naturally die off as we see species becoming extinct on our planet daily.

I have worked hard at my own personal transformation into a fearless and loving being. I am no saint, don't get me wrong... I just no longer have any fear because I am convinced that who/what I actually am is a perfect child of creation, immortal and eternal and just knowing that one simple one sentence long fact about myself has been amazingly transformative. Since I have reached this understanding about myself, my whole life has completely changed.

During the course of my 54 plus years, I had not had a stretch of more than 2 or 3 days without some issue coming up, something to be angry about, something I had to change... about my life or about another person... and yet since April 26th this year when I discovered Houman's Horus-Ra thread and then I recalled precisely who/what I am, I have had not one moment of fear, of anger, of attachment to others or outcomes - it was like the last major dot got connected. Now surely since then I have still explored my wild theories and sometimes think and often then post stuff that's nuts but the war inside me ended.

If someone who has been as messed up as me could make such a transformation, anyone can and if more and more of us make their own transformation out of the us / them dynamic and instead look at life's dilemmas as universal hurdles we all most resolve, there's no more war needed to be won because war itself no longer exists.

The archons would have to adjust to a new type of food or become extinct.

Anyways... this has been my latest theory as to resolution of the archontic problem and maybe I am in a majority of one with this idea, but so far it has worked for me.

Keep going Vivek and 9eagle9 and participating Avalonians! We are on a roll!

justone

[9eagle9]

Bioluminescence seems to be the most likely of a culprit and more genetically probable as far as a luminescent light humanoid type being. Fits up what I noted about it was stimulated by something in the environment, food, water etc. Self generating producers of light.

The stimulation of melatonin is prompted by light as well to regulate the body---sun light. People are in general still dysfunctional without sunlight so it seems we still have quite a lot of genetic tendencies and necessities towards light. Human growth hormone is carefully regulated in this way too. Perhaps longetivity/ immortality was lost when the environment was irradiated or some other catastrophe occured.

My journal indicates a cataclysm that indicating radiation and somewhat noxious beams of laser light emissions that weren't very healthy.

Journal also indicates 'the more the earth was poisoned the more we poisoned ourselves ', on a psychological level even.

Those who adapted to this new harsh environment took issue with the old ways of doing things and began to abase this somewhat instinctual magick as being primitive and even evil. I wonder if instinctual magick is in alignment with 'naturally occuring magick' , when someone self generates light in some fashion , without conscious intention.






Bioluminescence is a term used to describe light created by living organisms. It is what gives a firefly its shine, makes waves glow at night, and lights up a deep-sea anglerfish lure. The animal itself is the light source; or rather, chemicals within the animal’s body excite electrons to give off light. Bioluminescence is truly special because it requires input from no other energy source than the food the animal consumes. Certain types of proteins, called luciferins, store energy in the form of excited electrons. These electrons are freed from their bonds by enzymes called luciferases. Once free they become less energetic, and in doing so, release energy in the form of photons, or light. Virtually all bioluminescent reactions occur in this manner, whether created by bacteria, vertebrates, or anything in between.

[Jeffrey]

Bioluminescence: Why Organisms Glow

There's no consensus on why the ability to produce light has evolved so many times, but one theory has gained traction for life in the deep sea, according to Sparks.

"Luciferins, these light-producing molecules, are all good antioxidants, so it is thought that they may have been around as antioxidants, then, over time, they were co-opted for signaling," Sparks said.

As the oxygen content of the oceans increased, animals moved into deeper waters, out of the reach of harmful ultraviolet radiation. In the deep water, where the antioxidants were no longer needed to repair genetic damage caused by UV radiation, luciferins became the basis for a light-producing system, he said.

Not everything that glows is bioluminescent. Some organisms, such as corals, fluoresce, meaning they absorb light at one wavelength, such as UV radiation, and emit it at another wavelength. Since UV light isn't visible to the human eye, these creatures can appear to produce their own light.



­Here's a rundown of some of the primary uses for bioluminescence on land and at sea:

•Communication: Fireflies flash at one another in a species-specific pattern, often in order to find a mate.

•Locating food: In the twilight depths of the ocean, some fish species use their light like a spotlight to find prey.

•Attracting prey: Some species, like the angler fish, use a luminescent lure to attract other fish.

•Camouflage: In the darker parts of the ocean, it's hard to see anything below you, but it's easy to see the silhouette of what's above you. For this reason, some species produce spots of light on their undersides, which
blur their outlines and allow them to blend in with the light from above. This is also known as counter-illumination.

•Mimicry: The cookie-cutter shark has one unlit patch on its underside, which resembles a smaller fish when viewed from below. When a large predator approaches, the shark can take a large bite and then flee. This allows the cookie-cutter shark to prey on animals that are much larger and more powerful than it is.

•Self-defense: When threatened, some animals release a cloud of bioluminescent fluid, similar to the way squid defend themselves with a cloud of ink. Others use a bright flash to blind predators.

Excerpts from: http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/ani...organisms-glow and http://science.howstuffworks.com/env...inescence2.htm

Considering we are nearly at the top of the food chain, producing light in this manner doesn't seem like it would be nessecary. This process involving luciferase and luciferen wouldn't produce any other effects than glowing for the reasons mentioned in the excerpts above.

Fluorescence & Phosphorescence

Fluorescence and phosphorescence are both examples of photoluminescence. In both cases, light is absorbed and then re-emitted at a less-energetic wavelength. Fluorescent and phosphorescent objects usually glow under exposure to ultraviolet light (though this is not a requirement). Fluorescence involves absorbing and releasing lower energy light almost immediately, while the light release of phosphorescence is delayed, so these materials appear to glow in the dark.

Source: http://chemistry.about.com/od/images...osphorescence/

If we are considering these midi-chlorian/chloroplast-like organelles absorbing energy/light from our "inner suns" (chi/ki/prana/meridians/source field) and transmuting it somehow to re-emit it for usable energy for the body I think the fluorescent/phosphorescence means would be more practical. The luciferase/luciferen system doesn't require absorbsion of energy from a light source, it is self-sufficient so to speak (requiring oxygen and sometimes ATP, but no light is required as precursory). The processes of phosphorescence or fluorescence methods absorb energy from a light/energy source similar to how chlorophyll works.

Chlorophyll is vital for photosynthesis, which allows plants to absorb energy from light.

Chlorophyll molecules are specifically arranged in and around photosystems that are embedded in the thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts. In these complexes, chlorophyll serves two primary functions. The function of the vast majority of chlorophyll (up to several hundred molecules per photosystem) is to absorb light and transfer that light energy by resonance energy transfer to a specific chlorophyll pair in the reaction center of the photosystems.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll

So these fictional midi-chlorian/chloroplast-like organelles that humans may have had at one time, functioning as an energy source for mitochodria (and possibly more advanced functions), would more closely resemble the mechanisms involved in chloroplasts, chlorophyll, and fluorescent/phosphofluorescent energy systems. A side effect could/would be bioluminescence, but not through a luciferen/luciferase system if we consider energy being the justification for such a sytem in the first place. I don't think bioluminescence would be a end in and of itself.