Posted by the_vast_mystery
(here)
That would be nice, but to become "our own" shaman we'd first need to be 100% sure we were not lying to ourselves and that the person we found to teach us shamanism was not themselves lying in any way either. There is no way to establish trust because there is no definitive starting point where we can be sure we are partaking in an undistorted, correct way of going about it. I mean I can say that certain people (This forum has a few of them) obviously seem very genuine about their practice. However when it comes into the realm of forming definite conclusions my trust is only at best a gamble I'm taking because I'm still making any assessment of anyone based on the idea that:
1: I would know in any way who I could trust.
2: I am able to research correctly into shamanism
3: That I could use item 2 and 1 to determine a good shamanic instructor.
But the problem is the first two, is that it would be trivial for a myriad of circumstances to prevent me from ever being able to figure out individual trust on a personal level let alone be able to even judge the quality of an instructor in a practice I am not even sure I'm correctly acquainted with yet. Similarly I could have my research sabotaged by any number of subjective biases or simply not be competent at academic level research. Now, I'm certain I have some level of competency at those things but I am not certain the level of that competency. And it is because of that issue that I am able to be quite certain in absolute terms of only one thing: I am unable to judge in any way who would be right to learn from or what information regarding shamanism is accurate.
Therefore, my assessments of anyone else's abilities could be hopelessly flawed, and worse yet I might lack the metacognitive ability to realize my own assessment is hopelessly flawed.
Because of that it can be considered that it would be impossible for me to even learn shamanism because I would never be able to be certain of any instruction I had received because there was never any one point I could be certain neither I nor the other person was in any way being deceptive or reiterating information that was based on past deception. (such as distorted teachings that could be passed down for instance.)
I might form ideas and attempt to convince myself of their certainty to establish a faux-trust, but that trust would be based on the illusion that I had in all certainty established and verified the accuracy of all material; as well as that I was fully mentally capable of making that assessment. (Which of course for a start is impossible if you're the newbie learning from someone else.) So really, without figuring out who's lying beforehand there's just no certain way to do it.
I could still take a gamble, like everyone else. But I would rather not gamble on such important matters.