This guy seems bona fide, yes, but for me that is not an issue. Basically he’s saying that space travellers are decoys for the real bad guys, who are time travellers. The notion of time is very complex and problematic in ways that people who are comfortable with notions like “us in the future” just don’t get. Actually, if we really understand time as an illusion, it may in fact be a whole lot simpler. Let me give you an example.
The other day I was reading how some species of dinosaur was so big that it needed about ten tons of food per day, and that its mouth was simply not big enough to do the job. Now there are two ways to deal with this. Either you take the scientific approach and speculate that the world was not as it is now, or that they had some other food source, or whatever. Or you accept that everything is just an illusion, fancy artwork or stage scenery that on closer inspection just doesn’t add up. Like a monster gargoyle on a cathedral, it doesn’t have to mean anything, it is just there for decoration. If you are dealing in illusion, it is as easy to create a fossilized dinosaur directly as to create a live one and leave it to fossilize, and it doesn’t have to “work”. This is where we find all kinds of anomalies, and when applied to such things even good science is bad science because it takes the illusion at face value.
The idea is that the fossil is just an object in the present, with no past. This means that a million fossils that seemingly add up to an extinction event do no such thing – you just have a million fossils decorating a doomsday film set. So, dinosaurs that needed more food than they could possibly eat never existed, and neither did they ever die out.
You can do the same with the asteroid belt: it certainly looks like the remnants of an exploded planet, but maybe it is just an artist’s impression of one. In that case it would be just presentday space junk that has not been previously bombarding the earth in fictitious extinction level events. That is just the storyline we have built up to account for all this stuff that is just up there. Anything goes, we can imagine whatever we like, but that is all we are doing: jumping to conclusions, all the time.
There are no rules. Ufos appear to defy the laws of nature and of physics? They are typical anomalies telling us that such laws do not actually exist. When you astral travel, you pass through walls, go wherever you want; this is more of the same. All this paranormal stuff just happens to nudge us into realizing that what we call normal is nothing of the sort.
So maybe the Roswell crash is like a reversal of the fossilized dinosaur. It seems to have tentacles reaching out into the future, involving us as will be, and another, imminent extinction level event: this is the famous Big Picture one arrives at by showing discernment between info and disinfo. There is no big picture, that is another/the big lie – except that it is just an illusion, the very notion of the big lie is itself an illusion. This extinction is not going to happen either, it is just the continuation of our storyline, and us in the future is merely the us that continues in the illusion, i.e. us as part of the illusion.
The bottom line is that the 6.5 billion of us that need to be genocided are getting in the way of that illusion. There are only very few real sheep buying into it, the rest of us are getting on with our lives. How many people worldwide expect the world to become uninhabitable by next year? Hardly anyone. It ain’t gonna happen. That is why nearly everyone has to go, and not just the whistleblowers. And of course we will indeedd be going our separate ways. The disaster scenarios we are hearing are that situation as described from the opposite viewpoint, i.e. part of the illusion describing itself – before it fades back into non-existence.
Re: From Bill Ryan -- the Ultimate Hypothesis
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks