Alex Jones is OK/Assange is in trouble

[Nickolai]

OK, people,

Please come with the ideas why this is happening. Why the Mr Big Threat (Alex Jones) is having no trouble to call all the government of the States, the UK and other countries names and still is having tele business, ok, selling goods, travelling to Bohemian Groove and other places while the WiKi guy is in the serious trouble.
Because he posted the secret materials. Well. I would say that the Alex calls names the president of the country, screaming for a national responses to defend the country and there is no slightest response from the state. Youtube channel is closed? Well, he still has Infowars...)) For how many years he is on? Any serious troubles we don't know about?

Bill recently said that whistleblowers job is very dangerous for they can pay the highest price -their life. Alex is not afraid, is he?

Actually what I can say from watching some of his lately, he is not even bothered...))

And please that does not go with me that the Alex is such an odious peron that no one can make any harm (please, kindly keep in mind, that Nickolai is good willed person but just ****ing curious).

That just does not make sense. No way. Not now, Assange is much more popular and really made the difference to the world.

Same I could not ever understand about Icke. Excuse me, the person who officially call the Queen names and a reptile is still in the UK? Seriously? No trouble? Interviewed?
But it's a bull*, wrong? Seriously?

Any sheeple (Am I? ) would ask you questions like this. Any thinking sheeple!

And about the sheeple! That's the very arrogant thing to say about people, Just my opinion. Especially, keeping in mind how often so well-informed people post things incredible, without any proof whatsoever. But everything that is told by those people is eaten and forgotten.

Please sober comments are highly appreciated.

Nickolai

PS And I know the AJ theme is a big no-no, taboo. I don't care, I just want the answers for probably I want myself to stop being sheeple...)))

[Nickolai]

Sober comments? What is this?

What I mean by insober one (I once got it for my question):
Nickolai, the Powers That Be can not dare to touch Alex because he is so incredibly popular in world...

Why I consider it insober? Because, alas, Alex is not that popular in the world. In the US - might be. In UK, - ok! In Australia- OK! But not so much in the world.

I explained

[modwiz]

Assange is just distraction drama. His 'leaks' had a purpose for his employers. Even Brzezinski saw that he worked for intelligence. He has enemies, but they aren't as powerful as his friends.

[ThePythonicCow]

The typical successful parasite does not adapt to some idealized sterile host, but rather adapts to the more typical host that has a functioning immune system. The parasite learns to ignore (and be ignored by) portions of that immune system, and leverage or mutate to its advantage other parts of the hosts immune system.

The parasite of human civilization which I like to call The Bastards in Power have learned to adapt to a civilization that includes the like of David Icke and Alex Jones. That parasite has even adapted to the presence of a Julian Assange, though in a more restricted way, with Assange in house arrest, or now confined to an embassy.

But that is a rather vague and general answer. The question you're asking, as I take it, is how have the predator bastards adapted such that they take advantage of David Icke's or Alex Jones' presence.

That question I don't have clear words to answer, just the usual "alternative media" platitudes.

[Nanoo Nanoo]

Assange would be considered credible as he has built a reputation on being a serious jernolist. Alex jones , an ex wrestler , is a sensationalist. He makes his mark from selling over sensationalised banter and fear porn. yes he does expose a lot of stuff , yes its actually really good info if thats the type of thing you are interested in. However his credibility is sketchy at best.

His reportage actually benefits PTB . Assange definitely puts a spanner in their works. But it wouldnt surprise me one bit if both were employed by PTB back end kook programs.

Lets clarify some things

In order to hide stuff its best to put it right under our noses. Truth sprouted by a " kook " is the best way to do this. then sprinkle dis info and confuse people by diseminating it by " reputable " news reporters and what do you have ? A lot of people confused and not knowiung what to believe in. While they are kept in a constant state of confusion, numbed by toxification in food and water supplies , they can get onto their task of Absolute ownership and slavery dictatorship. They see this as a solution because in their eyes we have become un palletable. And in some cases i can see why , but most of the ugly situations in the world are from gross miss management of power and greed , ego , evil etc.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zzLptiNfqoY

the movie here is called Roswell , in it is a very accurate description of how they use and manipulate information. scroll to 1 hour 11 minutes t about 1 hour 15 minutes.. it will illustrate how they go about things.

Hope this helps

N
N

[Nickolai]

Well,

I totally agree that the whole Assange story could be false. I just feel compassion to the story.
On the other hand I think that the sory could make a new page of our history. We will see?
I have just watched the video on another thread dedicated to AJ and was once again astonished by the sheer negativity that comes from the man, absence of any cultural skills of communications to the same like (humans). It really just blows my mind, how bad this person is. I do not care what he says but what he is and that is so obvious.
One does not have to know English to be blown away by the low energy.
I have no idea why he is so popular.

Nickolai

[watchZEITGEISTnow]

Posted by modwiz (here)
Assange is just distraction drama. His 'leaks' had a purpose for his employers. Even Brzezinski saw that he worked for intelligence. He has enemies, but they aren't as powerful as his friends.

Sometimes I think he is MK

Sometimes I think he IS CIA

Sometimes I think this guy is a false pin up for the truth - kind of like the way they roll...

Glad I'm not alone thinking this guy is suspect and BTW he denies ANY 911 truth - that speaks volumes to me...

[modwiz]

Posted by watchZEITGEISTnow (here)

Posted by modwiz (here)
Assange is just distraction drama. His 'leaks' had a purpose for his employers. Even Brzezinski saw that he worked for intelligence. He has enemies, but they aren't as powerful as his friends.

Sometimes I think he is MK

Sometimes I think he IS CIA

Sometimes I think this guy is a false pin up for the truth - kind of like the way they roll...

Glad I'm not alone thinking this guy is suspect and BTW he denies ANY 911 truth - that speaks volumes to me...

It screams volumes to me.

[Magnus]

My personal understanding of the interacting factors at work:

Alex Jones doesn't focus too much on anything specific other than to be extremely broad and deep in his research and information which he is also very good at saturating with hatred, though his information is often, basically very good.

Alex Jones efforts attracts and entertain a wide range of different mindsets, an audience in wich there is enough variation of actionable paths and mixed personalities to overwhelm the average Joe to a degree where he's becoming a rather indecisive hater chasing his own tail, and thereby AJ is a minor threat to the PTB as his efforts isn't likely to accumulate enough momentum to make any damage.

On the other side of the fence we find Assange who has become a distinct threat to the PTB due to his narrow turns, solid evidence, his determination and the application of strategically focused force and last but definately not least the exponentially growing threat generated by his popularity.

The combination of all this factors (and more), makes Julian Assange a tremendous danger to the PTB while he is an equally important asset to politically persecuted nations as well as the uprise of the global truth movement.

[nottelling]

Why is Alex Jones allowed to happily shout at the Bilderbergers with a bullhorn infront of an adoring crowd and go home every night to count his money?

Why is Assange under siege in a foreign embassy after being accused of sex crimes?

Both say they are fighting against TPTB.

Why is one ignored and the other pursued? Why is Assange more of a threat to "them" than Jones?

[gripreaper]

Alex Jones always "colors within the lines" so to speak. He always references mainstream news sources for his content, and he has the "end of the world as we know it" hyper attitude, placing himself at the apex of the Infowars. Just that title alone means it's divisive instead of unitary.

After a few weeks of listening to his radio show, I find myself wanting to dive under the bed just when the light switch clicks. He sure knows how to tickle the fear gene.

[spiritguide]

The missions of each mentioned is different and has different effects on the subjects addressed in their messages. Jones uses hypnotic repetition to emotionally excite one with slightly misleading info mixed in with known corruption. Jones asks his audience to donate and buy if they like his style of mind numbing repetition. Icke shares what he has learned in a straightforward manner and asks his audience to think and do for themselves given the situation. Assange just got downloaded info and spread it out to the masses with no conjecture about the data, just hidden communications from behind the screen. Jones uses emotions to excite into stupor, Icke uses reason to excite into self awareness,and Assange's group just distributed hidden communications that might expose officials for what they really are. Our minds are constantly being played with by those in power and there are so many double blinds at play for the control that one must truly step outside of the conditioning at play to analyze any of it. IMHO

[Siberia9]

If you look into Assange, you will find out that he was raised inside a cult in Australia. An obvious CIA front for mind control. They druged the children with LSD and did all kinds of experiments on them. Most of Hitlers scientists went to work in this field and so its no surprise that this cult has been connected to the Nazi ideals or to the CIA. Once you are involved in these people it sticks with you your whole life.

I grabbed this statement about it off one google search for example.

"When Julian was 8-years-old, his mother, Christine, married a member of "The White Brotherhood" - aka "The Family" or San­ti­nike­tan Park Asso­ci­a­tion, a private psychiatric hospital on the outskirts of Melbourne Australia."

"In the 1960's-1980's, the Santiniketan Park Association received CIA-Sandoz LSD-25.
The psychiatric hospital was part of a New Age colony with about 200 members. They were all professionals: psychiatrists, medical doctors - 25% were nurses - lawyers, and ranking civil servants and social workers."



Assange is doing his job and is playing the victim, thats my vote.

[nottelling]

Posted by Siberia9 (here)
If you look into Assange, you will find out that he was raised inside a cult in Australia. An obvious CIA front for mind control. They druged the children with LSD and did all kinds of experiments on them. Most of Hitlers scientists went to work in this field and so its no surprise that this cult has been connected to the Nazi ideals or to the CIA. Once you are involved in these people it sticks with you your whole life.

I grabbed this statement about it off one google search for example.

"When Julian was 8-years-old, his mother, Christine, married a member of "The White Brotherhood" - aka "The Family" or San­ti­nike­tan Park Asso­ci­a­tion, a private psychiatric hospital on the outskirts of Melbourne Australia."

"In the 1960's-1980's, the Santiniketan Park Association received CIA-Sandoz LSD-25.
The psychiatric hospital was part of a New Age colony with about 200 members. They were all professionals: psychiatrists, medical doctors - 25% were nurses - lawyers, and ranking civil servants and social workers."



Assange is doing his job and is playing the victim, thats my vote.

For sure.

Assange is a verified member of the family of nutjobs known as the "Family" (of nutjobs) as described here in his own words -

When Assange was eight, Claire left her husband and began seeing a musician, with whom she had another child, a boy. The relationship was tempestuous; the musician became abusive, she says, and they separated. A fight ensued over the custody of Assange’s half brother, and Claire felt threatened, fearing that the musician would take away her son. Assange recalled her saying, “Now we need to disappear,” and he lived on the run with her from the age of eleven to sixteen. When I asked him about the experience, he told me that there was evidence that the man belonged to a powerful cult called the Family—its motto was “Unseen, Unknown, and Unheard.” Some members were doctors who persuaded mothers to give up their newborn children to the cult’s leader, Anne Hamilton-Byrne. The cult had moles in government, Assange suspected, who provided the musician with leads on Claire’s whereabouts. In fact, Claire often told friends where she had gone, or hid in places where she had lived before

Source: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...urrentPage=all

[nottelling]

Oh wait... it says...

...he told me that there was evidence that the man belonged to a powerful cult called the Family...

and

The cult had moles in government, Assange suspected, who provided the musician with leads on Claire’s whereabouts. In fact, Claire often told friends where she had gone, or hid in places where she had lived before

Meh. Close enough.

[TraineeHuman]

Assange is mainstream, and a journalist and publisher, and so he doesn't state conclusions or inferences beyond anything the evidence he provides. He therefore influences all journalists. This tends to create at least a small leak in the dike.

The elite rely on the press to feed us mostly pure misinfo on any important issues. If they ever lose their vice-like grip on the press, they know it will be all over for them. That's why they're so frightened of Assange.

[ghostrider]

If the ptb draw attention to Alex by moving against him in any way , it would been seen as HEY there must be some truth in what he is saying to the masses. Assange has the goods, on paper about all the dirty laundry , even if it is sanitized , it's hard for the the sleepers even the deep ones to ignore it, we don't believe anything unless is has a government stamp and considered an official document , just like disclosure , some want to government to come clean, but do you need a document by a politicain to know something you already know ? just my two cents worth.

[The Arthen]

It could be because the more insane you sound, the more the PTB assumes you're not a threat. Whatever it is - things will probably look more and more like a group of bandits who have no choice but to band together for the time being.

Complacency has its microscopic wonders.

You can in fact use complacency to your advantage with anything. Question is - is your advantage gonna work, or not? And even if it does - is it good for the biggest picture you can best possibly fathom?

[Andreash94]

i say icke and jones are desinformers .. i think even project avalon is starting to be a bit desinfromant :| all craps i see whit OH MY GOT IN 2 dAY ALIENS WIL COME AND SMELL OUR ASS .. just sayn im thinkin to leave project avalon

[Nickolai]

Dear Andreash94,

I see what you mean. And I do agree with you.
Same thoughts come to my mind.

Warm regards,

Nickolai